Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Decision Support Tool For The Assessment of Biofuel Sustainability
Decision Support Tool For The Assessment of Biofuel Sustainability
Anastasios Perimenis
Bologna, September 18th, 2009
in cooperation with
German Biomass Research Centre, Torgauer Str. 116, D-04347 Leipzig, www.dbfz.de
Content
1. 2. 3.
Background Decision support systems - Introduction Decision support tool for biofuels
4. 5.
Background
Biofuels in brief
Increased interest for biofuels in the world context Mandates and policies supporting biofuels Means against anthropogenic GHG emissions Security of energy supply for the transport sector Reduced oil reserves Current generation already established. Research focused on next generation biofuels Production alone is not enough. Sustainability of production is the main concern (ISCC, RTSB) Large number of biofuel pathways analysed. Large amount of data to be
Background
Biofuel pathways
Introduction
Decisions are part of everydays life Decision making is a demanding and time consuming process
Problem Recongition Implementation Problem Definition
Selection
Alternative generation
Alternative Analysis
Source: Shim et al, 2002
Model development
An iterative process
5
Introduction
Decision support systems (DSS) are computational systems that: form the decision environment (e.g. actors, problems, impacts) structure the decision making process by defining goals and means to achieve them link strictly computational attributes with the users judgement ability promote cooperation and debate between actors provide decision makers help in order to make well educated decisions help the user decide; not decide instead
6
Introduction
Fundamental characteristics of DSS: Database to store information Model with algorithms for the analysis Interface for interaction with the user Decision aiding has been used in various sectors Water management Health care planning Energy sector Environmental protection Decision systems for the bioenergy sector (BioAS, Biotrans, Gemis)
BioAS
Mihailo Pupin, Belgrade / ICS UNIDO, Italy heat and power MCA with outranking method multi-objective option ranking yes yes (extended) yes many evaluation criteria not entire pathway
Biotrans
ECN, the Netherlands transport biofuels cost analysis economic cost effective biofuel mix yes no no many alternatives, comprehensive strictly cost oriented
Biomitre
IEA Bioenergy Task 30 energy and transport LCA environment GHG emissions, PE consumption , costs for avoidance yes no no quick LCA tool interface
Gemis
ko Institut, Germany energy and transport LCA environment environmental effects, costs yes yes (limited) no very thorough complexity
8
Bioenergy sector Approach Focus area Result Integrated database Social aspect User preference Main advantage Main weakness
General framework
Pathway selection & break-down
Data inventory
Aspect analysis
Data inventory
DECISION
9
Methodology
Pre-decision stage (analysis part) Pathway selection & breakdown (WTW concept)
Country specific characteristics
Module A Biomass production Module B Biomass transport Module C Biofuel production Module D Biofuel distribution Module E
Biomass Land
Logistics
Conversion
Logistics
Biofuel use
Mobility
Methodology
Criteria determination Technical aspect - Conversion rate (quant.) tfeedstock/tbiofuel - Energy efficiency (quant.) MJbiofuel/MJinput - Complexity (qual.)
11
Methodology
Economic aspect - Biofuel production costs (quant.) /lbiofuel - Well-to-Wheel (WTW) costs (quant.) /km Environmental aspect - Greenhouse gas emissions (quant.) t_CO2-eq/GJbiofuel - Primary energy demand (quant.) MJPE/GJbiofuel Social aspect - Direct jobs (quant.) FTE/kgbiofuel
12
Methodology
Data inventory
Module Data examples
Biomass properties, yields, land requirement, fertilizers & Biomass production pesticides, water & fuel demand, labour, machinery, investment & operational costs, emission factors, etc Biomass transport Biofuel production Biofuel distribution Biofuel use Road modality, vehicle type, fuel consumption, distances, prices, emission factors, etc technical data, product properties & yields, auxiliaries & energy demand, investment, prices, emission factors, etc Road modality, vehicle type, prices, fuel consumption, distances, emission factors, etc Vehicle type, fuel consumption, annual use, distances, emission factors, etc
13
Methodology
Decision stage (user involvement) Multi criteria analysis (MCA) characteristics Complex problems conflicting criteria of different gravity compromise for optimal solution
Consideration of user preference Connection of analytical part with personality characteristics Consolidation of different opinions within a group
14
Methodology
MCA methodology Results from pre-decision stage Assign points to criteria
15
Methodology
Assign points to criteria Criteria of different attributes Conversion into a form appropriate for evaluation Point scale as a common basis
16
Methodology
MCA methodology Results from pre-decision stage Assign points to criteria Determine importance of aspects and criteria
17
Methodology
Determine importance of aspects and criteria Expression of personal preference Assign weighs to aspects and criteria Preferential ranking matrix
+ : more important 3 points 0 : equally importnat 2 points - : less important 1 points
18
Methodology
MCA methodology Results from pre-decision stage Assign points to criteria Determine importance of aspects and criteria Assign a score to the pathway Compare and rank pathways Decide Decide as group Review procedure
Group DST
19
Application example
Mod. B
Transport
Mod. D
Distribution
Mod. E
End-use
20
Application example
Results
Criteria Technical
Conversion rate Energy efficiency Complexity Development status
tRS/tRME % -
Unit
Points 4 3 3 5 3 2 3 5
Weight 0,25 0,27 0,38 0,19 0,15 0,38 1,00 0,25 0,5 0,15 0,13 1,00
21
Economic
RME production costs
/lRME
Environmental
Greenhouse gas emissions Primary energy demand
kg_CO2-eq/GJRME GJPE/GJRME
Social
Direct jobs
FTE
Pathway score
Legend: RS rape seed ; FTE Full time equivalent
3,39 out of 5
(67,8%)
Basic characteristics:
Integration of all aspects along the entire value chain Link with database User involvement Easily interpreted results
More to add:
- Sensitivity analyses for influence factors - More pathways including reference - More criteria (land use change, indirect & induced job effect, biodiversity, GHG mitigation costs - Programming language
With further development it can be used by various actors (, scientific institutions, governments, NGOs, private companies) in a local and national scale.
22
Deutsches BiomasseForschungsZentrum gemeinntzige GmbH German Biomass Research Centre Torgauer Strae 116 D-04347 Leipzig www.dbfz.de Tel./Fax. +49 341 - 2434 112 / -133
M.Sc. Dipl.-Ing. Anastasios Perimenis Tel. +49 341 2434 551 anastasios.perimenis@dbfz.de
23