1/10/2010 ‘The Critique of Judgement. Part: Crit. The Critique of Judgement PartI: Critique of Aesthetic Judgement by Immanuel Kant translated by James Creed Meredith eBooks@Adelaide 2008 ebooks. adelaide.eduauik/kant/.. 163) wig3/10/2010 ‘The Critique of Judgement. Part I: Crit. This web edition published by eBooks@Adelaide. Rendered into HTML by Steve Thomas. Last updated Mon Feb 2 15:22:40 2009. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence (available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/au/). You are free: to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work, and to make derivative works under the following conditions: you must attribute the work in the manner specified by the licensor; you may not use this work for commercial purposes; if you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under a license identical to this one. For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you get permission from the licensor. Your fair use and other rights are in no way affected by the above. For offline reading, the complete set of pages is available for download from http: //ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/k/kant/immanuel/k16j/k16).zip The complete work is also available as a single file, at http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/k/kant/immanual/k16j/complete.html AMARC21 Catalogue record for this edition can be downloaded from http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/k/kant/immanuel/k16j/marc.bib eBooks@Adelaide The University of Adelaide Library University of Adelaide South Australia 5005 ebooks. adelaide.eduauik/kant/.. 163) 2/1191/10/2010 ‘The Critique of Judgement. Part : Crit Table of Contents PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION 1790. INTRODUCTION. I. Division of Philosophy. © II. The Realm of Philosophy in General, © III. The Critique of Judgement as a means of connecting the two Parts of Philosophy in a whole. © IV. Judgement as a Faculty by which Laws are prescribed a priori. © V. The Principle of the formal finality of Nature is a transcendental Principle of Judgement. © VI. The Association of the Feeling of Pleasure with the Concept of the Finality of Nature. © VII. The Aesthetic Representation of the Finality of Nature. © VIII. The Logical Representation of the Finality of Nature. © IX. Joinder of the Legislations of Understanding and Reason by means of Judgement. FIRST PART. CRITIQUE OF AESTHETIC JUDGEMENT SECTION I. ANALYTIC OF AESTHETIC JUDGEMENT. * BOOK I. Analytic of the Beautiful. o FIRST MOMENT. Of the Judgement of Taste : Moment of Quality. + §1. The judgement of taste is aesthetic. + § 2. The delight which determines the judgement of taste is independent of all interest. + § 3, Delight in the agreeable is coupled with interest + § 4, Delight in the good is coupled with interest. + § 5, Comparison of the three specifically different kinds of delight. °@ SECOND MOMENT. Of the Judgement of Taste: Moment of Quantity. + §6. The beautiful is that which, apart from concepts, is represented as the Object of a universal delight. + § 7. Comparison of the beautiful with the agreeable and the good by means of the above characteristic. + §8. Ina judgement of taste the universality of delight is only represented as subjective ebooks. adelaide.eduauik/kant/.. 163) 3/119