Professional Documents
Culture Documents
J&K Human Rights Perspective, Nov-Dec 2011
J&K Human Rights Perspective, Nov-Dec 2011
J&K Human Rights Perspective, Nov-Dec 2011
Vol. 9No. 6
J&K
www.humanrightsjournal.com
RIGHTS
Perspective
Nov-Dec., 2011
Bimonthly Review of Jammu and Kashmir Affairs with Human Rights Perspective
hat is the significance of J&K State People's Convention held in 1968 under the leadership of Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah? Any event associated with Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah would, of course, be a matter of interest. But this was made more momentous because of the other important personalities of Kashmir who attended it, as well as the issues that were discussed threadbare for the first time. The leaders included almost the entire spectrum of separatist politics-the extremist leader Syed Ali Shah Geelani and his party Jamaat-eIslami; G M Karra, leader of the proPakistan People Conference; Mirza Mohd. Afzal Beg, President of the Plebiscite Front; Mirwaiz Maulvi Farooq; and veterans like Maulana Massoodi, P N Bazaz and Shamim Ahmad Shamim. Regional dimensions Though Jammu and Ladakh-based parties were invited to the Convention, they boycotted it, for it proposed to discuss the final solution of Kashmir problem, which they believed had been resolved with J&K as an irrevocable part of India. The Kashmir-based parties considered this to be only a provisional solution. The discussions in the Convention were not based on any special claims
of region or community, but on universal principles of democracy, secularism and egalitarianism. Its resolution made a specific reference to the abiding values of the freedom movement of Kashmir that most pro-India parties believed was inspired the by freedom movement of India, and which drew popular Kashmiri leaders to India, not Pakistan, in 1947. The relationship between Kashmir and India had, however, been over a period of time been strained due to conflicting regional claims, and divergence between Kashmiri nationalism and Indian nationalism. The resolution, therefore, wisely affirmed that any decision about "the political future of the state should keep in view the interests of all its regions". This was not the first time such a commitment was made by Kashmiri leaders. In 1952, Sheikh Abdullah had supported the demand of regional autonomy. Dialogue between Kashmiri leaders and national leaders The Sheikh's cordial relations with liberal national leaders like Nehru and Jaya Prakash Narayan epitomised the strength of the avowed common values of the two freedom movements. JP continued to maintain contact with the Sheikh even after Nehru's death in 1964. Indeed, he had opposed Sheikh's arrest in 1953, and sympathised with his
political stand. But, after Indo-Pak war of 1965, he came round to the view that Pakistan had lost its claim over Kashmir as it had used war as a weapon to decide the issue. The Sheikh invited JP to inaugurate the People's Convention. JP in his inaugural address ruled out any solution of the Kashmir problem outside the framework of India. The Sheikh countered this statement by saying azadi has to be snatched, it is not donated. The Convention prepared the ground for a dialogue between leaders of Kashmir and those of others regions, as also between them and the national leaders. It also broadly indicated the limit of any solution of Kashmir problem that was acceptable to the people of Kashmir. But a number of developments intervened to prevent any solution acceptable to all parties. Indo-Pak war on Bangladesh in 1971 ruled out any settlement between two powers of the region, while return to power of Sheikh Abdullah in the State opened the prospects for a settlement of the problem within India. In no case, People's Convention should be treated as an exercise in futility, and its relevant lessons should not be completely dismissed. Balraj Puri
ONE
November-December, 2011
TWO
November-December, 2011
BOOK
REVIEW
TO OUR READERS
On account of increasing financial constraints, we are unable to maintain our present complimentary list. We would therefore welcome subscriptions, renewals and donations from our readers, friends and sympathisers to help us to sustain the Human Rights.
Overseas
Cheques may be sent in the name of Institute of Jammu and Kashmir Affairs, the publishers of the Journal. Outstation cheques may add Rs 30/- as collection charges.
THREE
November-December, 2011
Fayaz was an adult when he was picked up but the First Additional District and Sessions Judge, Srinagar in its order dated 12 March 2009, had declared him a juvenile on the date of commission of offence registered against him under Section 302 of the Ranbir Panel Code. "He is condemned to stay in the R S Pura Juvenile Home as both the judiciary and the state have no interest to ensure expeditious trial of his case registered 16 years back," Chakma alleged. Enlisting the findings of the fact-finding team, he said the state government has been illegally detaining an unspecified number of minors under PSA. A large number of juveniles have currently been placed in the general jails where many of them attained adulthood during the course of their detention due to a lax justice delivery system. The study has expressed concern that the state neither has a Juvenile Justice Board nor a Child Welfare Committee resulting in the minors being tried in normal courts. Also, juveniles were being tried with adults if charged in the same offence. ACHR has recommended that additional measures should be taken to strengthen the juvenile justice system. In this regard it has pointed out that the Juvenile Home being constructed at Harwan was a measures "too little too late". The state government must provide all facilities to house juvenile delinquent girls. The existing Juvenile Justice Act should be repealed and replaced by a new law in conformity with the Juvenile Justice (care and protection of children) Act, 2000. It has demanded that immediate orders should be issued to try all the pending cases against juveniles by the Juvenile Justice Boards established under the new Act. Ensure that inmates at the R S Pura Home are provided expeditious trial and regularly produced before the courts. A look at ACHR report suggests that Kashmir is still anything but normal, a situation which continues to fan discontent illustrated by last year's stone throwing. Chakma admits it is hard to know exactly how many juveniles are kept in the state's adult prison system because of lack of transparency. The report cites 51 cases involving juveniles which ACHR says are being tried illegally in Kashmir's normal court system. The detention of juveniles under Kashmir's special laws is only part of the problem, according to the report. The study titled "Juveniles of Jammu and Kashmir: Unequal before the Law & Denied Justice in Custody" was conducted by ACHR after field visits to Srinagar, Budgam, Shopian, Pulwama, Islamabad, Kulgam, Ganderbal and Jammu districts from May to July 2010 followed
FOUR
November-December, 2011
suspension of a police constable in connection with the death of a police constable-cumdriver Abdul Qayoom Bhat at the residence of DySP Daljeet Singh of IRP 11 battalion at Sainik Colony yesterday. DySP Daljeet Singh and DySP Mohinder Singh, Adjutant, IRP 11 battalion have been attached to IRP Lines while constable Ajay Kumar, PSO of Daljeet Singh with whose Insas Bhat had allegedly shot himself dead has been placed under suspension, official sources said. A departmental inquiry has been ordered into the case while investigations under Section 174 RPC have already been initiated, they added. Meanwhile, the protests continued for the second consecutive day at Rajouri today with irate mob blocking Abdullah bridge and Gujjar Mandi for hours together in protest against the mysterious killing of IRP Bn 11 driver Shahid Mohammed son of Abdul Qayoom Bhat of Ward No 10, Rajouri at the residence of DySP Daljeet Singh in Sainik Colony Jammu yesterday. The mob shouting slogans in protest against the death of the cop demanded an impartial probe and action against the guilty. They warned to continue the road blockade and protest till the guilty was punished. However, later at the assurance of Deputy Commissioner, Rajouri, G A Khawaja and SSP Vijay Samyal that an inquiry will be conducted by the Government into the death of the cop and those found guilty will be punished that the people lifted the blockade. Meanwhile, hundreds of mourners attended the Namaz -e-Jinaza of slain cop after his dead body reached in the town this afternoon after post-mortem from GMC Jammu. Both DC Rajouri and SSP Rajouri also attended the Namaz-e- Jinaza of the slain cop which was performed at Talab mosque. The people accompanied over one kilometre long Namaz Jinaza procession from Dak Bungalow Rajouri to Talab Masjid. Addressing the Namaz-e-Jinaza Moulana Mohammed Youns and Khateeb Jama Masjid Rajouri Ghulam Rasool said that with this heinous act the people have lost all faith in police. They wanted to know why driver was denied leave (Daily Excelsior, December 5, 2011)
Mirwaiz as saying in a statement. He said the party has always condemned and rejected such incident. Mirwaiz has expressed sorrow and condolences with the bereaved family. (Rising Kashmir, December 26, 2011)
deployed under the operational control of the Army in J-K. "All incidents of ceasefire violations are investigated and protests are lodged with Pakistan military authorities at appropriate level through the established mechanism of hotlines, flag meetings and meetings between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMO) of the two countries," he said. The issue of ceasefire violations was taken up with the Pakistan side during the Foreign Secretary level talks between India and Pakistan held in Islamabad in June, he added. (Kashmir Times, November 30, 2011)
FIVE
November-December, 2011
Ahmed Shah, which is a welcome step, but investigations into the killing of 7 other civilian political workers have not yielded any results so far. JKCCS demands an impartial and independent investigation into all the killings of civilian political workers. Impartial investigations would help bringing the perpetrators to justice and also act as a deterrent. SUICIDES AND FRATRICIDES BY ARMED FORCES PERSONNEL Suicides and fratricides by the personnel of the Indian armed forces, continues to exist as an issue in the year 2011. This year 15 armed forces personnel committed suicides in Jammu and Kashmir due to unknown reasons and another 9 were killed in fratricidal incidents of violence. TORTURE/HARASSMENTS/ILLEGAL DETENTIONS The paranoia of government regarding the summer uprising of 2010, was very evident this year in the actions taken by the government. Even in 2011, when there was no apparent street uprising, hundreds of boys were detained on the pretext of being stone pelters. These young boys are subjected to torture, intimidation and harassment. In many police stations boys are illegally being detained; sometimes for few hours and sometimes for few days. Some boys are regularly being called to police stations on one pretext or the other. There is complete disregard towards the juvenility of the boys being detained. This year many minors were arrested on charges of stone pelting. In some cases people alleged that police officials have been demanding ransom for releasing these boys who were illegally detained in various police stations. RAPES AND MOLESTATIONS State Human Rights Commission (SHRC) passed a judgment on the Kunan Poshpora mass rape case of 1991, demanding re-opening of the case and also filing a case against the then Director Prosecutions. It is for the first time a government institution has acknowledged this mass rape incident.
It took state 20 years to acknowledge the crime and it isn't clear how long government will take to convict perpetrators. This year in Kulgam area of south Kashmir, there was an allegation of rape, where a woman alleged that she was raped for 2 days. The way police conducted investigations into this case and also kept the family literally under house arrest, raised more suspicion against the government. Fear and social stigma makes it difficult for the victims to report the rape or molestation cases. One such case, by coincidence came into the notice of JKCCS in north Kashmir this year where the rape victim did not want to report her victimization. In the month of February a woman (identity withheld) from north Kashmir was allegedly raped in police custody in front of her husband. The husband was kept under detention as a hostage so that his wife would not report her case. The woman did not want to file complaint as she had no hope of getting justice and also was worried that by filing the case she would endanger her husband's life. IMPUNITY Government of India has been claiming that despite the imposition of AFSPA, mechanisms of justice are functional and deliver whenever anyone is found indulging in human rights abuses, but facts provided by the state institutions this year contradict the claim of the Indian state. In a reply to an application under Right to Information Act by JKCCS, the State Home Department of the Jammu and Kashmir government on 6thSeptember 2011 claimed that from 1989 to 2011, they have applied for sanctions for prosecution from Ministry of Defence and Ministry of Home Affairs under section 7 of AFSPA in 50 cases only. Out of these 50 cases, 31 pertain to Ministry of Defence and 19 others have been sent to Ministry of Home Affairs. Within these 50 cases stated to be applied by the State Home Department for sanctions under AFSPA, sanction for prosecution is awaited in 16 cases and declined in 26 cases. The State Home Department claimed sanction for prosecution has been recommended in 8 cases. A deeper study of these 8 cases where the State Home Department says
that the status is "recommended", it appears that the information given is incorrect as the cases according to Defence Ministry are still in the category of "under consideration" or sanction has been declined. Above facts reveal that the provision of sanctions for prosecution under AFSPA is a fig leaf and the truth is that there is 100% impunity for the soldiers operating in Jammu and Kashmir. In the context where in Jammu and Kashmir we have more than 8000 cases of enforced disappearances, thousands of cases of custodial killings and fake encounters, thousands of cases of rape and molestation and thousands of cases of torture etc; applying for sanctions for prosecution in only 50 cases speaks volumes about the seriousness shown by the State Government so far for protecting the human rights of people of Jammu and Kashmir. This year there have been voices raised by politicians regarding the revocation of AFSPA, which is also aimed at generating an impression that human rights violations will end by the revocation of AFSPA. The fact is that Jammu and Kashmir Police has been an equal partner in crimes committed on the people. The Jammu and Kashmir Police personnel also have been responsible for a huge number of human rights abuses. The armed Village Defence Committees (VDCs), Special Police Officials (SPOs), and the counter insurgent government sponsored militias like Ikhwan have also been responsible for perpetrating heinous crimes. Which law allows the creation of these groups? Which law encourages them to perpetrate human rights abuses? Which law sanctions their impunity? It is the law of lawlessness. Revocation of AFSPA from some areas would not help in ending the human rights abuses as the sense of immunity in the soldiers is not derived from laws but from the political culture of impunity, for which State Government and the Government of India are largely responsible. The government should help the processes of justice and help prosecute officials accused of human rights abuses. The mechanisms of justice which have been forced to not function by the
(Contd. on page 7)
J&K HUMAN RIGHTS Perspective
SIX
November-December, 2011
government should be empowered to punish the guilty, which would be a meaningful confidence building measure for the people of Jammu and Kashmir. We urge the Government of India to end the culture of impunity and not just AFSPA from Jammu and Kashmir. KILLINGSDUETOUNEXPLODEDSHELLS AND LANDMINES This year 8 persons have lost their lives in explosions, which were caused due to unexploded shells used during counter insurgency operations and 1 out 8 deaths was reported due to landmine explosion. ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS OF JUSTICE State Human Rights Commission (SHRC) has tried to assert its existence by passing some very significant judgments this year. Prominent amongst the cases where SHRC passed the judgements was the case of unmarked graves and mass graves in north Kashmir, Kunan Poshpora mass rape case and the plight of prisoners languishing in various jails across Jammu and Kashmir. Besides these judgments SHRC has been actively helping in the cases to provide ex-gratia relief. Judiciary in Jammu and Kashmir continues to show an abysmal performance and has failed to live up to the expectations of the victims. Amongst the people of Jammu and Kashmir disillusionment regarding judiciary is at its lowest, as it has failed in holding perpetrators accountable. Notwithstanding the powers to protect life and liberty of citizens, judiciary has disappointed people of Jammu and Kashmir. Judicial activism for protecting the civil and political rights and seeking accountability from the state actors is very apparent in India, but it seems to be completely absent in the Jammu and Kashmir judiciary. Jammu and Kashmir Coalition of Civil Society The Bund, Amira Kadal, Srinagar - 190001. Email: p_imroz@yahoo.co.in Editor Office Phone
Qazinag Karnah, Kupwara, came in contact with some explosive device which exploded, resulting in injuries in her right arm. Police sources added that the injured girl was shifted to SDH Tangdhar where from she was referred to Bone and Joint hospital, Srinagar for further treatment. Police said that the explosive device is believed to be pressure mine that seems to have been drifted or carried away by the flowing water in the Nallah from the "No Man's Land" near the Line of Control (LoC). Masrat had been admitted to Bone and Joint hospital Srinagar and doctors said that her right arm might be maimed. "She has a critical injury. Right hand is almost dislocated. She is under observation," a senior doctor told Kashmir Times. Police records maintain that around 15 persons have died and 17 injured due to the littered explosives in Jammu and Kashmir this year. On July 24, two teenagers-21-year-old Ashfaq Ahmad Khan and Babar Khan (20)were killed while fiddling with unexploded explosive object in a forest in Rafiabad area of north Kashmir's Baramulla district. In the same month two teenagers were killed while another was injured due to an explosion from unattended explosive brought by the teens from the rubble of a house damaged in an encounter between militants and joint team of army and police in Tral town of Pulwama district in South Kashmir. Earlier, in September this year a 14-yearold boy was among two persons killed and seven others including four females injured in an accidental explosion in the same district. In April, two persons were killed in Akhnoor area of Jammu when a shell exploded in a scrap shop. A month later, another youth was killed in the same area in a similar incident. A labourer Abdul Hamid was killed in South Kashmir's Anantnag district when a live shell inside dead stock went off last month. In February this year, three children of Muhammad Maqbool of Maloora on the outskirts of city were killed when they were playing with a live shell, after a gunfight in the area. In July this year, security forces and separatist guerrillas had faced each other in a gunfight in Maidanpora village of Lolab. (Kashmir Times December 3, 2011)
the 2010 unrest in Kashmir. It denied that Kashmir had witnessed highest number of attacks on the police personnel compared to other states. In a written reply to questions by two members, Ravi Shankar Prasad and Shivanand Tiwari, the Minister of State for Home Affairs, Jitendra Singh, told the Rajya Sabha. "As per National Crime Record Bureau data, 91 civilians got killed and 494 civilian got injured in police firing during 2010 in Jammu and Kashmir," he said. He, however, dismissed the suggestion that the number of police personnel, who become victims of violence at the hands of rioters, is highest in Kashmir in comparison to other states. Instead, he said, police personnel in other states had been the target of far more attacks than those in Kashmir. Since 2008, the minister said, the security agencies had busted 46 ISI networks in India and that the Pakistani agency continued to help militant outfits like Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaishe-Muhammad and Hizbul Mujahideen. However, he said, such activities would be tackled with a firm hand. It may be recalled normal life across Kashmir valley remained virtually paralyzed for around five months in the wake of the killing of a minor student, Tufail Ahmad Mattu, on June 11, 2010 after he was hit by a tear smoke shell fired by the police. The incident triggered massive protests all over the valley disrupting normal life for around five months during which 125 civilians, mostly teenagers, were killed as a result of use of disproportionate force by police and paramilitary personnel. Hundreds of others were injured, many of them being maimed for life. (Kashmir Times, November 26, 2011)
: BALRAJ PURI Associate Editor: ELLORA PURI : Karan Nagar, Jammu - 180 005 (J&K) INDIA. : 91-191-2542687, 2543556 Mobile: 94191-02055 E-mail : balraj_puri1@rediffmail.com
Back issues are also available on our website www.humanrightsjournal.com
J&K HUMAN RIGHTS Perspective
SEVEN
November-December, 2011
Section 4(1) (b) (v) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 passed by the Parliament. The petitioners may like to file RTI applications with the Union Home Ministry asking for these documents. If so, they should not forget to mention in their application that these standing orders, guidelines etc. ought to have been proactively disclosed under the J&K RTI Act. Because this has not been done they are constrained to file a formal RTI application seeking the information. Citizens outside J&K can ask for this information as it is under the Central RTI Act. J&K Public Safety Act, 1978 The J&K Public Safety Act gives the State Government rule-making powers. None of these Rules have been placed in the public domain. In addition to the rules there might be standing orders, standard operating procedures, guidelines, office memoranda, instructions or circulars issued for operationalising this law. If such documents do exist they are required to be proactively disclosed under Section 4(1) (b) (v) of the J&K Right to Information Act, 2009. They petitioners might like to file RTI applications with the Home Department asking for these documents. If so, they should not forget to mention in their application that these standing orders, guidelines, etc. ought to have been proactively disclosed under the J&K RTI Act. Because this has not been done they have been constrained to file a formal RTI application seeking the information. Citizens outside J&K cannot ask for these documents as they are not entitled to seek information under the J&K RTI Act. Court Decisions on Detention under Special Laws Here are a few decisions of the Supreme Court and the J&K High Court regarding information disclosure provisions under these special laws:
The J&K High Court decision in Abdu Aziz Dar makes it very clear that merely stating vague and unsubstantiated reasons is not enough for detaining somebody. Reasons must include all materials that constitute the basis for justifying the detention of a person. If petitioners come across unjustified detentions, they might be able to use the 48-hour clause in Section 7(1) of the J&K RTI Act to get all this information on an urgent basis. Similarly, Section 4(1) (d) of the J&K RTI Act obligates the detaining authority to give specific and detailed reasons for detaining an individual under any of these laws. The recent decision of the Supreme Court in relation to detention under special laws, in Ummu Sabeena case, clearly states what will be treated as delay in the disposal of representations against detention orders. Detentions under special laws are covered by Article 22 of the Constitution and the safeguards are built into paras 7-15 of this decision. Even though these decisions relate to laws other than those applicable in J&K the common thread is the Court's interpretation of a detenue's rights under Article 22 of the Constitution. This issue relates centrally to detentions made under the laws mentioned above in J&K. Petitioners might be able to link this with Section 4(1) (d) of both the J&K RTI Act and the Central RTI Act. Every detenue has the right to know the detailed reasons for rejection of his or her representation against the detention order or its confirmation. These provisions in law can be used to challenge illegal or unjustified detentions in J&K. Venkatesh Nayak Programme Coordinator Access to Information Programme Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative
EIGHT
Edited, Printed and Published by Balraj Puri for Institute of Jammu & Kashmir Affairs, Karan Nagar, Jammu. Printed at ESS ESS ESS Offset Press, Wazarat Road, Jammu.