Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture Notes1
Lecture Notes1
Key Points
1. The quantity of a good or service is efficient if there is no other quantity that makes at least one
person better off without also making someone else worse off. At the efficient quantity, marginal
benefit equals marginal cost and the social surplus is maximized.
2. The equilibrium quantity in a competitive market is economically efficient provided there are no
increasing returns to scale, no externalities, and no “public” (collective consumption) goods.
3. When there are increasing returns to scale, externalities, or collective consumption goods, the
equilibrium allocation of resources in a competitive market is not efficient.
4. The quantity of a collective consumption good is likely to be inefficient no matter how the good
is supplied, whether the good or service is provided using the market model or the voluntary
contributions model or the government model. Using the market model, the supplier excludes
individuals who do not pay from consuming the good even though the marginal cost of serving
them is zero. Using the voluntary contributions model, individuals lack incentives to voluntarily
pay an amount equal to their marginal benefit. Using the government model, voting and taxes are
both sources of inefficiency.
Synopsis
First, we define the basic concepts used in microeconomic analysis: marginal benefit (also called
marginal utility or marginal value), marginal social benefit, marginal cost, and marginal social cost. A
demand function, schedule, or curve shows consumers’ marginal benefit for a good or service. A
supply function, schedule, or curve shows the marginal cost of providing a good or service.
Next, we define the concepts of consumer surplus, producer surplus, and social surplus, which is the
sum of consumer and producer surplus. We show that the social surplus is greatest when marginal
social benefit equals marginal social cost.
We then introduce the concept of economic efficiency. Efficiency is defined as a quantity such that no
other quantity would make one individual better off without harming someone else. Economic
efficiency is the most fundamental concept in the course. We show that the quantity of a good or
service that maximizes the social surplus is the efficient quantity.
We show that the competitive market equilibrium quantity is efficient if there are no increasing
returns to scale, no externalities, and no “public” (that is, collective consumption) goods. But when
there are increasing returns to scale or externalities or public goods, the equilibrium quantity is not
efficient. This is called “market failure”. We then define increasing returns to scale, externalities, and
“public” goods and show why each one causes market failure.
With “public” goods, if suppliers charge a price, they exclude some individuals whose marginal
benefit is positive but less than the price even though the marginal cost of supplying them is zero. On
ECO 4554: Economics of State and Local Government
Microeconomic Analysis of the Public Sector:
Market Efficiency and Market Failure
the other hand, if suppliers do not charge a price but rely on voluntary payment by consumers,
consumers lack incentives to pay an amount equal to their true marginal benefit. In either case, the
quantity of the “public” good supplied is less than the efficient quantity. Finally, we argue that
government provision of a “public” good is also likely to be inefficient because it relies on voting and
taxes both of which are sources of inefficiency. Therefore, no matter what model of provision is
adopted, the supply of “public” goods is likely to be inefficient.
Lecture Notes
A. Marginal benefit (or marginal utility or marginal value): The change in benefit (or
utility or value) obtained by an individual or community from a small (that is, a
marginal) change in the quantity of a good or service:
MB=ΔTB÷ΔQ
2. Marginal benefit is not total benefit. The marginal benefit is the additional
value obtained from a small increase in the quantity, or the additional value
lost from a small decrease in the quantity. The total benefit is the sum of the
marginal benefits obtained from all units of the good from zero up to that
quantity.
c. The law of diminishing marginal benefit is the basis for “the law of
demand”, which says that when price increases, quantity demanded
decreases, and when price decreases, quantity demanded increases.
Demand curves are negatively sloped because of diminishing
marginal benefit.
2
ECO 4554: Economics of State and Local Government
Microeconomic Analysis of the Public Sector:
Market Efficiency and Market Failure
pay no more than $11 for a sixth CD. Therefore, his marginal benefit from a
sixth CD is $11. Huey places a positive value on the sixth CD; it provides
him with additional satisfaction or pleasure, but not as much as the previous
5 CD’s.
2. Marginal social benefit (MSB) includes both the marginal private benefit
(MB) or utility obtained by the direct consumers or users of the good or
service and any external benefits (MEB) received by other individuals who
are not direct consumers or users: MSB=MB+MEB.
3. Example: No one other than Huey benefits from Huey’s CD’s. Therefore,
Huey’s marginal benefit from the sixth CD is also the marginal social benefit
of the sixth CD ($11=$11+$0).
C. Marginal cost: The change in opportunity cost resulting from a small change in the
quantity of a good or service. The opportunity cost of a good or service is the value
of the best alternative good or service that could be supplied using the same
resources:
MB=ΔTB÷ΔQ
2. Marginal cost is not total cost; the marginal cost is the additional cost of a
small increase in quantity or the cost saved from a small decrease in quantity.
The total cost of any quantity is the sum of the marginal costs from
producing all units of the good from zero up to that quantity.
3
ECO 4554: Economics of State and Local Government
Microeconomic Analysis of the Public Sector:
Market Efficiency and Market Failure
4. Example: Suppose the total cost to produce 5 CD’s for Huey is $15 but
producing a sixth CD would increase the total cost to $21. Then, the marginal
cost of the sixth CD is $6 ($21-$15). If the marginal cost of the fifth CD was
$5, then marginal cost is increasing.
1. The marginal cost to all members of the community from a given quantity of
the good or service is the marginal social cost of that quantity of the good or
service.
2. Marginal social cost (MSC) includes both the marginal private cost to the
supplier of the good or service (MC) and any external costs imposed on other
individuals (MEC): MSC=MC+MEC.
3. If there are no external costs, the marginal social cost is the same as the
marginal cost to the supplier.
4. Example: No one other than the producer bears any of the costs of producing
CD’s for Huey. Therefore, the marginal cost of Huey’s sixth CD is also the
marginal social cost of that CD ($6=$6+$0).
A. Consumer surplus: The difference between the marginal benefit or utility of a good to
consumers and the price paid (marginal consumer surplus) or the difference between
consumers’ total benefit or utility or willingness-to-pay and their total expenditure on
the good (aggregate consumer surplus). See PowerPoint Slides Figure 1-3.
Price
$50
$45 a
$40 Consumer
$35 Consumers'
Surplus
'Surplus b
$30
$25 c
$20 D (=MB)
$15
$10
$5
$0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Quantity
4
ECO 4554: Economics of State and Local Government
Microeconomic Analysis of the Public Sector:
Market Efficiency and Market Failure
1. Diagrammatically, the distance between the demand curve and the price at
any quantity shows the marginal consumer surplus of that quantity: CS=MB-
P. The area below the demand curve and above the price and between zero
and any quantity shows the aggregate consumer surplus of that quantity.
B. Producer surplus: The difference between the marginal cost of a good to suppliers
and the price (marginal producer surplus) or the difference between total cost and
total revenue received for the good (aggregate producer surplus). See PowerPoint
Slides Figure 1-4.
Price
$60 S(=MC)
$50
$40
$30
$20 Producer
Surplus
$10
$0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Quantity
1. Diagrammatically, the distance between the supply curve and the price at any
quantity shows the marginal producer surplus at that quantity: PS=P-MC.
5
ECO 4554: Economics of State and Local Government
Microeconomic Analysis of the Public Sector:
Market Efficiency and Market Failure
The area between the supply curve and the price and between zero and that
quantity shows the aggregate producer surplus of that quantity.
2. Example: Suppose the price is $30. The marginal cost of the tenth unit,
shown by the supply curve, is $20. Therefore, the marginal producer surplus
of the tenth unit is $10. The marginal cost of the fifteenth unit is $30, exactly
equal to the price, so the marginal producer surplus of the fifteenth unit is $0.
But total producer surplus for all fifteen units is $225.00. (You can find total
producer surplus at any quantity by calculating the area between the supply
curve and the price from zero up to that quantity.)
3. When marginal cost at a particular quantity is less than the price, an increase
in the quantity increases producer surplus. When marginal cost at a particular
quantity is greater than the price, a decrease in the quantity increases
producer surplus. And when marginal cost at a particular quantity is equal to
the price, producer surplus reaches a maximum at that quantity; either an
increase or a decrease from that quantity decreases producer surplus.
4. Producer surplus represents the net gain to suppliers from producing that
quantity of this particular good or service instead of using their resources to
produce the most valuable alternative good or service.
C. Social surplus
Price
$60 S (=MC)
$50
$40
$30 Social
Surplus
$20 D (=MB)
$10
$0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Quantity
6
ECO 4554: Economics of State and Local Government
Microeconomic Analysis of the Public Sector:
Market Efficiency and Market Failure
A. This is the most basic concept. We show that the competitive market equilibrium
quantity is economically efficient. The argument is divided into steps:
QD=QS
The price and quantity at which this occurs are the equilibrium price and the
equilibrium quantity.
2. Intuitive explanation
7
ECO 4554: Economics of State and Local Government
Microeconomic Analysis of the Public Sector:
Market Efficiency and Market Failure
D. Proof that the competitive market equilibrium quantity is also the efficient quantity
8
ECO 4554: Economics of State and Local Government
Microeconomic Analysis of the Public Sector:
Market Efficiency and Market Failure
1. For example, if all inputs double, output increases by more than double.
When you double the inputs, your costs also double, but if your output more
than doubles, your cost per unit, or average total cost, goes down.
3. Decreasing LRATC means a single large supplier can satisfy the entire
market demand at lower average cost than several smaller competing
suppliers. There are “economies of scale” to larger scale production.
4. Recall that (a) consumers choose the quantity at which MB=P, and (b) the
efficient quantity is the quantity at which MB=MC. This requires that
P=MC. But with increasing returns to scale, P=MC means P<LRATC.
9
ECO 4554: Economics of State and Local Government
Microeconomic Analysis of the Public Sector:
Market Efficiency and Market Failure
P<LRATC means losses for suppliers. Any supplier who produces the
efficient quantity where MB=P=MC suffers losses and in the long run leaves
the market. The best that sellers can do is to set a higher price equal to
LRATC to avoid losses. At a higher price, however, the quantity demanded
by consumers is less than the efficient quantity.
V. Externalities
1. Individuals choose the quantity of each activity that makes their marginal
private benefit (MB) equal to their marginal cost. They ignore or may even
be unaware of the marginal external benefit (MEB) received by other
individuals.
2. Marginal private benefit does not include any benefits received by other
individuals. When individuals other than the direct consumer or producer
benefit from an activity, the marginal social benefit is greater than the
marginal private benefit: MSB=MB+MEB.
10
ECO 4554: Economics of State and Local Government
Microeconomic Analysis of the Public Sector:
Market Efficiency and Market Failure
1. Individuals choose the quantity of each activity that makes their marginal
benefit equal to their marginal private cost (MC). They ignore or may even
be unaware of the marginal external cost (MEC) they impose on others.
2. Marginal private cost does not include the costs imposed on other
individuals. When individuals other than the direct consumer or producer
bear some of the costs of the activity, the marginal social cost is greater than
the marginal private cost: MSC=MC+MEC.
3. Because the cost to the direct consumer or producer (marginal private cost) is
less than the cost to society (marginal social cost), the quantity chosen by the
individual (where MB=MPC) is greater than the efficient quantity (where
MB=MSC).
(1). If the students or their parents must pay the full costs of their
education, they choose to spend less on education than is
economically efficient. A subsidy (“free” public schooling or
a voucher for private schooling) equal to the marginal
external benefit creates incentives for the students or their
parents to increase their consumption of education to the
economically efficient level.
(2). Even without the subsidy, the students and their parents
would choose some level of education. The externality is
only relevant and a subsidy is only appropriate if the
externality is marginal. A marginal externality means that
additional education beyond the amount the students or their
parents would choose on their own confers external benefits.
If, for example, only the first eight years of education confer
external benefits, but students and their parents would
11
ECO 4554: Economics of State and Local Government
Microeconomic Analysis of the Public Sector:
Market Efficiency and Market Failure
12
ECO 4554: Economics of State and Local Government
Microeconomic Analysis of the Public Sector:
Market Efficiency and Market Failure
VI. “Public” (or more appropriately, collective consumption) goods See Example 1-2
A. “Private” (or individual consumption) good: A good or service such that each
individual consumes separate and identifiable units of the good; a unit of the good
consumed by one individual cannot be consumed by any other individual.
2. For private goods, each individual consumer’s MB for any one unit is also
the MSB for that unit of the good.
3. Total community demand for the good equals the horizontal sum of the
individual demands because separate units of the good must be supplied to
each consumer. At each price, we add the quantity that makes one
individual’s marginal benefit equal to the price to the quantities that make
every other individual’s marginal benefit equal to the price. The result is the
total quantity required to make each individual’s marginal benefit equal to
the price. See PowerPoint Slides Figure 1-9.
MB1=MB2=MB3=...=MSB=MSC
b. The total quantity provided must equal the sum of the amounts
required to satisfy each individual.
Q1+Q2+Q3+...=Qtotal
B. “Public” (or collective consumption) good: A good or service such that the same unit
of the good or service can simultaneously be consumed by more than one individual.
Individuals do not consume separate and identifiable units of a public good; instead,
they all jointly consume the same units of the good.
2. Community demand for a public good is the vertical sum of the individual
demands. Each unit is being simultaneously consumed by all individuals in
the group. The marginal social benefit of that unit of the good equals the sum
of the marginal benefits of each of the individuals in the group. See
PowerPoint Slides Figure 1-10.
13
ECO 4554: Economics of State and Local Government
Microeconomic Analysis of the Public Sector:
Market Efficiency and Market Failure
MB1+MB2+MB3+...=MSB=MSC
Q1=Q2=Q3=...=Qtotal
C. Public goods are not the same as government goods or publicly-provided goods
1. Although commonly used, the terms “public” good and “private” good are
unfortunate and misleading. More appropriate terms are “collective
consumption good” and “individual consumption good”.
• national defense
• crime prevention
• television programming
• roads (provided they are uncrowded)
• parks (provided they are uncrowded)
• golf courses (provided they are uncrowded)
• movie theaters (provided they are uncrowded)
• education
• tennis courts and similar recreational facilities
• fire protection.
14
ECO 4554: Economics of State and Local Government
Microeconomic Analysis of the Public Sector:
Market Efficiency and Market Failure
Many goods supplied in the market by the private sector do fit the technical
meaning of public goods, at least over some geographic range or for some set
of consumers:
a. In the market model, the supplier sets a price and excludes from
consumption any individual who does not pay the price. We refer to
this as “exclusion”.
b. In the voluntary contributions model, the supplier does not set a price
but allows anyone to consume the good whether or not they pay for
it. We refer to this as “nonexclusion”.
a. Suppliers set a price for the good. Individuals whose MB>P pay the
price and share in consumption of the good. Individuals whose
MB<P do not pay the price and are excluded from sharing in
consumption of the good.
15
ECO 4554: Economics of State and Local Government
Microeconomic Analysis of the Public Sector:
Market Efficiency and Market Failure
16
ECO 4554: Economics of State and Local Government
Microeconomic Analysis of the Public Sector:
Market Efficiency and Market Failure
1. None of the three models is likely to supply the efficient quantity of a public
good.
17
ECO 4554: Economics of State and Local Government
Microeconomic Analysis of the Public Sector:
Market Efficiency and Market Failure
3. Very important point: Even when some government action could, at least
conceptually, improve efficiency, that does not mean that government itself
must supply the good. This is an important point that is too often overlooked
or ignored. For example, the argument that government can improve
efficiency in the supply of education does not require that government
operate the schools. Subsidies to private schools may be just as effective as
“free” public education at creating incentives for students and their parents to
choose the efficient quantity of education.
3. Government can intervene in the market for a good in several ways only one
of which involves government as the supplier of the good.
18