Amendix E

SZ
u 6
mc
m : 3
5 $g$
.h
TABLE 14: SUMMARY OF CITIES 3 i?
Ei P
AND DEVICESREVIRWED Al 9 2 z?
STATE OF THE ART 5 i
a; El
SEARCH a rE u 0

Jurisdiction
Fort Worth, Texas 0 0
St. Joseph, Michigan l
Boston, Massachusetts 0 l 0
Pittsburgh, PA l 0 0
Inglewood. CA l l
Traverse Citv. Michiean l
Claremont, CA l *
Campbell, CA 0 0 0
Dartmouth. Canada l 0 a
Omaha. Nebraska l
Davis, CA l 0 l
Akron, Ohio l
Torrance. CA l 0 l 0 0 0
Beverlv Hills. CA l
Detroit, Michigan e
Oklahoma Citv, OK l l l
Simi Vallev. CA 0
Santa Cruz, CA l
Buena Park, CA l l
Redondo Beach, CA e
Alexandria. VA l
Halifax, Nova Scotia e l l l 0
Oakville, Canada l
Littleton. ‘Colorado l 0 e
Tampa, Florida l
Jacksonville, Florida 0 0
Dallas, Texas l 0 0
’ Dayton, Ohio l e a l
Cambridge, MA
San Luis Obispo, CA
Sacramento, CA
New Haven, CT
New Orleans, LA
Philadelphia, PA
Rochester. NY
Toledo, OH 0
St. Petersburg, Florida l
Washington, D.C. l 0 l l 0 0 l

Jurisdictions reporting neighborhood traffic control devices

169
TABLE
. 14: Summery._ of Cities end Devices Reviewed - State of tiee +t S.eerch (continued)

lurisdiction
San Jose, CA 0
Sacramento Co., CA l
Cuuertino. CA 0 l
Saratoga. CA l l 0 l .o
Carson, CA
Covina, CA
Cvorus, CA
Downev. CA 0 0
Glendale, CA l
Hawthorne, CA l
Huntinnton Beach, CA l
Irvine. CA 0
Los Angeles, CA 0 l
Norwalk, CA l
Pasadena, CA 0
Placentia, CA 0
Rancho-Palos Verdes, CA 0
South Pasadena. CA a
Whittier. CA 0
Oakland, CA l e
San Diego, CA 9
Belmont, CA 0
San Mateo. CA 9 l e 0
Menlo Park, CA 0 l
Lafayette, CA 0 0 l 0
Richmond, CA l l 0
Albany, CA 0
Redwood City, CA 0
Walnut Creek, CA l l 0
Pleasant Hill, CA l
Skokie, Illinois 0
Columbus, Ohio l
Louisville, KY l l
Hartford, CT l
Chicago, Illinois l l l l
Minneapolis, Minnesota l l
Grand Rapids, Michigan l l
Metuchen, NJ l

Jurisdictions reporting neighborhood traffic control devices (continued)

170
TABLE 14: Sunuaary of Cittes and Devices Reviewed - State of tie Art Search (co$+~d)

Jurisdiction
Buffalo, NY l 0
Concord, MA 0 0
Flint, Michigan l 0
Houston, Texas * 0
Keane. NH a
Memphis, Tennessee l 0
Miami, Florida 0 l l
Nashville. Tennessee 0 0 l
Isla Vista, CA 0
Aurora, CA 0 a 0 0 0 0
Charlotte. NC l 0 l
Cleveland, Ohio l 0 e 0
Berkeley, CA
Decatur, Illinois
El Paso. Texas
Farmington, Utah
Hampton, VA
Kalamazoo, Michinan
Kansas Citv. MO 0
Lake dswego, OR
Madisbn, Wisconsin
Norfolk, VA
Palo Alto. CA
Rockv’Mount. NC 0 0 a 0 0 e 0 0 a
St. Louis, MO
St. Pa& Minnesota
Salt Lake. Utah
San Francisco, CA l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Santa Ana. CA 0 0 0 c
Seattle.-WA
Shaker Heights, Ohid
Springfield, MA
Vancouver, BC
Visalia. CA l ..
Wichita, Kansas a 0 l l
Toronto, Ontario a
Concord, CA 0 0

Jurisdictions reporting neighborhood traffic co&o1 devices (continued)

171
‘TAkR 14: Summary of Cities and Devices Reviewed - State of the Art Search -(continued)

Jurisdiction
Eugene, OR
Toliet. Illinois 0 l
Portland, OR
Baltimore, MD
_ Tqcsgn, AZ
Jurisdictions reporting neighborhood traffic control devices (continued)

Note: Table 14 is by no means a complete summary of all jurisdictions believed to be using various devices cited. It is simply a
notation of those neighborhood traffic control devices observed or reported in the above North American conimunities which com-
prise the data base for this State-of-the-Art report. Many more North American jurisdictions are believed using some of these de-
vices for neighbbrhood traffic control purposes. Jurisdictions cited above may alsp use other devices not indicated on the table.
Some devices indicated above are test installations subsequently removed.

172
rt U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1981- 725402’1215 REGION 3-l
The Offices of Research and Development (R&D) of
the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) are
responsible for a broad program of staff and contract
research and development and a Federal-aid
program, conducted by or through the State highway
transportation agencies, that includes the Highway
Planning and Research (HP&R) program and the
National Cooperative Highway Research Program
(NCHRP) managed by the Transportation Research
Board. The F6P is a carefully selected group of proj-
ects that uses research and development resources to
obtain timely solutions to urgent national highway
engineering problems.*
The diagonal double stripe on the cover of this report
represents a highway and is color-coded to identify
the FCP category that the report falls under. A red
stripe is used for category 1, dark blue for category 2,
light blue for category 3, brown for category 4, gray
for category 5, green for categories 6 and 7, and an
orange stripe identifies category 0.
FCP Cm2gor-y Dem-iptiom
k. Improved Highway Deeigm and Open-horn
for §afety
Safety R&D addresses problems associated with
the responsibilities of the FHWA under the
Highway Safety Act and includes investigation of
appropriate design standards, roadside hardware,
signing, and physical and scientific data for the
formulation of improved safety regulations.
2. Reduetiom of Traffic Comgestiom, amd
hproved Operatiomal Effieiemcy
Traffic R&D is concerned with increasing the
operational efficiency of existing highways by
advancing technology, by improving designs for
existing as well as new facilities, and by balancing
the demand-capacity relationship through traffic
management techniques such as bus and carpool
preferential treatment, motorist information, and
rerouting of traffic.
3. Emviromm~emtal @om&deratiom~ im Highway
Desigm, Locatiom, Comstructiom, amd Opera-
tiom
Environmental R&D is directed toward identify-
ing and evaluating highway elements that affect
l The completa seven-volume official statement of the FCP is available from
the National Technical Information Service, Springfkld. Va. 22161. Single
copies of the introductory volume are available without charge from Program
Analysis (HRD-3), Offices of Research and Development, Federal Highway
Administration, Washington, D.C. 20590.
the quality of the human environment. The goals
are reduction of adverse highway and traffic
impacts, and protection and enhancement of the
environment.
4. Improved Materials Utilization amd
DWibilit y
Materials R&D is concerned with expanding the
knowledge and technology of materials properties,
using available natural materials, improving struc-
tural foundation materials, recycling highway
materials, converting industrial wastes into useful
highway products, developing extender or
substitute materials for those in short supply, and
developing more rapid and reliable testing
procedures. The goals are lower highway con-
struction costs and extended maintenance-free
operation.
5. Irmproved Desigm to Reduce Coats, Ewtemd
Life Expectamcy, amd Imsure Structural
S&?tgr
Structural R&D is concerned with furthering the
latest technological advances in structural and
hydraulic designs, fabrication processes, and
construction techniques to provide safe, efficient
highways at reasonable costs.
6. hmproved Teekmology for Highway
Cometrncdom
This category is concerned with the research,
development, and implementation of highway
construction technology to increase productivity,
reduce energy consumption, conserve dwindling
resources, and reduce costs while improving the
quality and methods of construction.
7. hproved Techmology for Highway
Maimtemamee
This category addresses problems in preserving
the Nation’s highways and includes activities in
physical maintenance, traffic services, manage-
ment, and equipment. The goal is to maximize
operational efficiency and safety to the traveling
public while conserving resources.
0. Other New Studies
This category, not included in the seven-volume
official statement of the FCP, is concerned with
HP&R and NCXRP studies not specifically related
to FCP projects. These studies involve R&D
support of other FHWA program office research.
i