Professional Documents
Culture Documents
John Niles Et Al - Mitigating Shaped Charge Jet Impact
John Niles Et Al - Mitigating Shaped Charge Jet Impact
John Niles, Steven Nicolich and Bruce Williamson US Army Research, Development and Engineering Command
Armaments, Research, Development and Engineering Center
Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey 07806-5000
and
Dr. Daniel Doll, Nikki Rasmussen, Steve Bradley and Les Bracken ATK Thiokol
Corrine, Utah 84307
15 November 2004
ATK THIOKOL
ATK THIOKOL
Perspective
Two of the Top Threats to US Forces in Current Operations Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs)
Car bombs Roadside mines, etc.
UNCLASSIFIED
ATK THIOKOL
SCJI-resistant explosives
Catastrophic damage from stowed/transported ammo is avoided Suppression of violent reaction significantly improves probability of survival for personnel and platform Sympathetic detonation will also be suppressed (no detonation, no SD)
SD barriers can be eliminated, reducing weight and allowing more design options
Other IM threats will also be mitigated Attacked logistic vehicles loads may be salvageable
US AFV design constraints limit other options such as barriers or additional armor
C-130 volume and weight envelope: 18 ton maximum
2
ATK THIOKOL
IM Threat Summary
Thermal Threats (FCO/SCO) Sympathetic Reaction Bullet and Fragment Impact
Threat characteristics understood Mitigation solutions are available Energetics Barriers System design
Threat characteristics understood Mitigation solutions not available Barriers not feasible except in main battle tanks Mitigation design features exist for small items only (Spider, etc) IM SCJI test normally assessed to fail (detonation), or, assessed as not a threat! An energetic solution is the only solution and is practical for many applications
3
ATK THIOKOL
SCs are used extensively in every conflict SCJ will remain a major threat for the foreseeable future
Larger SCs can be mitigated through tactics (law of diminishing returns) RPGs and smaller SCJs can be mitigated through energetics solutions
ATK THIOKOL
Mitigating SJCI
A rapid response effort is underway to provide munition resistance to shaped charge jet impact using a variant of PAX-21 melt pour explosive
Dense, less energetic additives have been found to suppress the violence of response without compromise of fragmentation performance Specific suppressive mechanism(s) have been identified 81mm, M821A2E1 HE loaded cartridge (mortar) body used as target munition. Explosive candidate has been labeled PAX-35: formulated as a Composition B replacement Type 4 reactions have been obtained against 50mm (Rockeye) threat munition
Efforts continue to improve resistance: threat focus is the PG-7 series 85mm RPG
Smaller SCs will be easily mitigated by this effort Tests are being conducted directly against munition with standoff No conditioning barrier to simulate worst case: attacks on logistics trains (supply trucks, no armor) Follow-on studies will be conducted with armor to assess AFV survivability Additives may work in pressed explosives as well as melt pours Lethality trade-offs may have to be examined for higher performance munitions (no free lunch, just blue plate special)
5
ATK THIOKOL
Program Approach
Capitalize on initial additive discovery
Identify similar materials Examine additives for optimum characteristics Castability Cost Producibility Formulation optimization IM threat response Develop inexpensive and simple screening tool(s) Perform subscale tests: lethality, IM characteristics, etc. Concentrate on direct munition attack: follow-on w/behind armor effects Downselect best candidate(s) for Castable formulations Pressed formulations
ATK THIOKOL
Optimizing PAX-35
Additive A increases formulation viscosity due to bonding among selected desired molecules Initial PAX-35 formulation with Additive A was castable, but not very pourable
Additive A has potential as a pressable explosive binder material Additive A has been replaced with an improved pourable material (Additive B) that minimizes intermolecular bonding characteristics, but still retains dense, desensitizing chemical moieties
A number of additives with very improved pouring characteristics have been identified and are undergoing down selection for fragmentation munitions
ATK THIOKOL
96
1.56
16.6 16
6.74
Additive A
96
1.5
6.654
Additive B
92
1.7
15.5
3.09 12.2
6.477
HTPB
cure
0.907
3.916
CAB/BDNPAF press
1.32
6.271
ATK THIOKOL
Reaction type is determined by evaluating damage to witness plates and the pipe
9
ATK THIOKOL
25mm SCJI
Dent and Rate Results
TNT PAX-xx
Additive A formulated to = TNT performance exhibits Type VI response to the 25mm SCJI
10
ATK THIOKOL
25mm SCJI
Additional Dent and Rate Results
Comp B Comp B PAX-35 Mod PAX-35 Mod
2-in. Steel Dent depth = 0.43 in. (Steel Plate Hardness Rb = 87) Detonation Velocity 7.56 km/s Pour Viscosity = 0.16 kP
2-in. Steel Dent depth = 0.39 in. (Steel Plate Hardness Rb = 104) Detonation Velocity 7.44 km/s Pour Viscosity = 0.64 kP
Modified PAX-35 with Additive B retains good performance, but exhibits a mild response to the 25mm SCJI
11
ATK THIOKOL
ATK THIOKOL
Witness plates in. thick 1ft x 10 in. mild steel witness plate in. thick 2 ft x 2 ft aluminum witness plate
81mm mortar cartridge Nose down Fuse well sealed with Al cap Body is very brittle (HF-1)
MK118 rockeye bomblet (50mm SC) 174 gms comp B 5 gm CH-6 booster
Note: Pressure gauges differentiate shaped charge input from main charge response 13
ATK THIOKOL
14
ATK THIOKOL
81mm Mortar - MK118 Rockeye Bomblet Shape Charge Jet Impact Test Comp B
16 14 12 10 Pressure, psi 8 6 4 2 0 -2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time,milliseconds
15
ATK THIOKOL
2.82 1.86
16
ATK THIOKOL
Other IM Threats
PAX-35 Response to the Army Fragment Threat
No Reaction No Reaction
17
ATK THIOKOL
Conclusion
An IM melt pour explosive has been successfully modified and tested against a major shaped charge threat in a munition without conditioning barriers A basic understanding of SCJI suppression mechanism has been developed Optimization activities will shortly enable practical, fully compliant IM munitions: munitions resistant to all IM threats It is feasible to pass SCJI attack at Composition B performance levels Dense, reduced energy additives desensitize without compromising performance 25mm SCJ is an inexpensive screening tool to assess IM impact threats
ATK THIOKOL
TNT
PAX-35 Mod