"In our country the people are sovereign and the Government cannot sever its relationship to the

people by taking away their citizenship." Afroyim v. Rusk , 387 U.S. 253, 18 L.Ed. 2d 757, 761, 87 S.Ct. 1660 (1967) No law prevents us from giving away everything we own. No law prohibits voluntary servitude. "Citizenship of the United States does not entitle citizen to privileges and immunities of citizen of state, since privileges of one are not the same as the other." K. Tashiro et al v. Jorden Secretary of State, May 20, 1927 (S.F.12346) 255 P. 545. "The mere fact that he asserts the rights of one citizenship does not without more mean that he renounces the other." Sadat v. Mertes, 615 F.2d 1176 (1980), at page 1185. "A domicile once established continues until it is superseded by a new domicile." Restatement (Second) of Conflict Of Laws 17, comment f (1971), Id. at 1181.

Qualified Heir
1. Who are you and where do you make your home? 2. Are you an innocent spouse or an injured spouse? 3. How have you been aggrieved? No one can tell us where we [live]. One man replied, Within the confines of my body, lifted his arms and spun his body around in a full circle. Cant argue with that logic, now can you? Unless we have the ability to answer the above questions we will fail in our efforts at reformation rescission and /or revocation in my opinion. We dont live within the State of ___________, (or whichever of the fifty) as that term is defined in the Intern-al Re-venue Code and/or the revised statutes, penal code (whichever term) used by a STATE. The land description on STATE documents are referring to the exterior boundaries of the existing state; and is all land, or territory, that is owned by, or ceded to, the United States of America. Obviously this fiction lies within the exterior boundaries since the Constitution for the United States lies outside the sovereignty of Nevada. Proper use of the English language dictates we capitalize only the first letter of proper nouns such as in California, Florida, Johnny, George, etc. The STATE OF NEVADA is not a proper noun. The Buck Act is responsible for the capitalization of our names, locations, etc. Ken is now KEN, Indiana is now INDIANA and so on. Thus, I am a non-resident alien to the federal govt but only a non-resident to Nevada. What creates Nevada? Is it understood that anytime land is identified and/or described on paper it then becomes property? Who owns the property now known as Nevada? King George? The president of the U.S.? No, I say as I remind you that all inherent power lies in and with the people.

We describe ourselves in Upper-Lower case lettering to separate ourselves from fictional characters, and we use the land survey description because that is whats identified within the Constitution. In addition, we are within the 8th Judicial District, a political subdivision, as that is defined in Nevadas constitution. Most importantly, we dont reside in, on, near, around, or close to our particular state. We can live there, but never do we reside. The Buck Act doesnt define boundaries because its primary purpose is as a directive concerning Art. 18.17-18. To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of Particular States, --And, To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof. The federal governments jurisdiction, within a given state, can only extend over ceded land such as military bases and postal buildings and land. To impose a gasoline tax they had to create that fictional federal area because the states lacked the constitutional authority to impose that particular type of tax. But, if were a federal employee then were subject to the tax. Another part of the Buck Act is the state seals were suspended. They were basically locked away after each state pledged an oath supporting the buck. After this act the states were no longer free and independent as weve been led to understand these terms. Its extremely important to note here; we do not reside within the state. The word reside implies a longer time than temporary but yet not permanent. Websters 1828 Dictionary: RESI'DE, v.i. s as z. [L. resideo, resido; re and sedeo, to sit, to settle.] 1. to dwell permanently or for a length of time; to have a settled abode for a time. the peculiar uses of this word are to be noticed. When the word is applied to the natives of a state, or others who dwell in it as permanent citizens, we use it only with reference to the part of a city or country in which a man dwells. We do not say generally that Englishmen reside in England, but a particular citizen resides in London or York, or at such a house in such a street, in the Strand, &c. When the word is applied to strangers or travelers, we do not say, a man resides in an inn for a night, but he resided in London or Oxford a month, or a year; or part of his life. A man lodges, stays, remains, abides, for a day or very short time, but reside implies a longer time, though not definite. 2. To sink to the bottom of liquors; to settle. [In this sense, subside is now used.] RES'IDENCE, n. 1. The act of abiding or dwelling in a place for some continuance of time; as the residence of an American in France or Italy for a year. The confessor had often made considerable residences in Normandy. 2. The place of abode; a dwelling; a habitation. Caprea had been - the residence of Tiberius for several years.

3. That which falls to the bottom of liquors. Obs. 4. In the canon and common law, the abode of a person or incumbent on his benefice; opposed to non-residence. RES'IDENT, a. [L. residens.] Dwelling or having an abode in a place for a continuance of time, but not definite; as a minister resident at the court of St. James. A B is now resident in South America. RES'IDENT, n. 1. One who resides or dwells in a place for some time. A B is now a resident in London. 2. A public minister who resides at a foreign court. It is usually applied to ministers of a rank inferior to that of embassadors. DOMICIL, n. [L., a mansion.] An abode or mansion; a place of permanent residence, either of an individual or family; a residence, animo manendi. DOMICIL, DOMICILIATE, v.t. To establish a fixed residence, or a residence that constitutes habitancy. DOMICILED, DOMICILIATED, pp. Having gained a permanent residence or inhabitancy. DIMICILIARY, a. Pertaining to an abode, or the residence of a person or family. A domiciliary visit is a visit to a private dwelling, particularly for the purpose of searching it, under authority. Do you see one can have several residences but only one domicil? [not domicile] We may own several homes as residences but we pick one domicil to maintain and preserve our [elective franchise]. This domicil is where our [vested interest] in the [certain farm] [or other business] pursuant to 262032A along with any [material participation] in the [certain farm] [or other business]. In summary; although we may reside in the city, our domicil is where we inhabit262209. Its all to clear that our birthright has been stolen altering our status and entitlement to state citizenship 262208. Are you an innocent spouse or an injured spouse? Did you answer both? Were innocent due to the fact there was a huge understatement on our original tax return. We didnt know that we were the beneficiary of an estate, did you? We didnt know there was a huge inheritance ready for the claim and based solely upon this fact, were innocent. Supposing one is not married, what then? Doesnt s/he then become the child of an innocent spouse? Prior to 1920 our grandmothers were innocent, couldnt vote and truthfully were outside the political arena. Do you understand how the significance of this entire agenda was designed to pilfer grandmas dower? Now that you can sufficiently define innocent, can you explain how weve been injured? Are we not entitled to [past due support]? Every taking was technically

unconstitutional, although legalized by rescission; thusly fraud can no longer be a valid argument. [See 12 CJS Cancellation of Instruments 68(b)(2) Fraud, and see 26CFR 1.1346-1 unconstitutional taxes] We know the [interest] was repealed on nonresident aliens, right?!! The majority of taxes imposed by the Federal Government, dating to George Washingtons Whiskey Tax, have been, without a doubt, unconstitutional. Why, you ask? I answer; the enforcement powers commonly associated with ad valorem taxes reach far beyond the confines of delegated authority and thusly; a constitutional significance is placed upon the necessity of congressionally declared war. Nemo plus juris ad alienum transfer potest, quam ispe habent: This, a law maxim, explaining the limitation within Art.12.3, and the value given to the word apportionment. Websters 1828 APPO'RTION, v.t. [L. ad and portio, portion. See Portion and Part.] To divide and assign in just proportion; to distribute among two or more, a just part or share to each; as, to apportion undivided rights; to apportion time among various employments. APPO'RTIONED, Divided; set out or assigned in suitable parts or shares. APPO'RTIONER, n. One that apportions. APPO'RTIONING, ppr. Setting out in just proportions or shares. APPO'RTIONMENT, n. The act of apportioning; a dividing into just proportions or shares; a dividing and assigning to each proprietor his just portion of an undivided right or property. Were entitled to a restitution and reimbursement of every tax collected via these alterations. Again, our estates have been altered and within an entitlement is [past due support]. Simply put, by virtue of our name we possess a certain [stock ownership] and [interest] in those altered estates. Alongside those entitlements we have an indirect interest as shareholders of mom & grandma created corporations. Whether in the stock market or not we possess the right to exercise an option and hold our property in the same status our ancestors once attained. Disqualified from voting, womens issues often times went unaddressed while numerous women were married before they were fifteen, even as young as twelve. Occasionally they were [exchanged] and sometimes sold as slaves or still worse, [bond servants]. Emphatically I stress this point, regardless of cognizance were employees either to the family farm estate or to the STATE. Who do you prefer to work for? If you look into the history regarding the Merchant Marine Act youll find that the continental navy was disbanded in 1797 and the fire of 1814 destroyed all the pension records. On the other hand, many of the black soldiers were denied their promise of 40 Acres and a mule for joining the Norths cause. Not to be outdone was the promise of some 120 Acres, livestock, a house and all [improvements]. Many tend to identify the word improvement with household fixtures yet fail to realize that an improvement is

also an heir, an addition to the [capital account]. A [life estate] is created in that new representative. All records: Family Bibles, Censes, Death, SAR, DAR, Military, School, Pension, Marriage Licenses are various instances and evidences of an established [trust]. In the chapter re generation skipping transfers of the IRC (in-ternal re-venue [code]) we find anything that similarly or otherwise operates in the same manner as a trust is a trust. My point is this; not only are there no easy answers, no silver bullets, and no easy way out, but if one is not in a particular fight at the moment its healthier to research, study and learn than to battle wits unarmed. Among the numerous undertakings I believe we need to revoke our voters registration, first and foremost. If out of state we must write to the county, or find the chapter in the statute/codes dealing with the revocation of that states registration and apply their particular process. Most state registrar offices maintain a [Form] as a convenience for this very purpose. Given my intent is to entirely withdraw any and all presumptions of a support for their system I wrote, Revoking the Election, in the explanation column. When researching the states statutes I find there is a bond at issue whenever there is a discussion regarding a certain dollar amount. For example; supposing the majority approves a bond issue, (bridge, park, road, school, etc.,) every pledge is considered assenting regardless of any personal disagreements. In turn property taxes support the schools, police and fire departments, etc. which increase with the passage of each new bond issue. This is yet another [raison d'tre] within our [right to sever]. Homeland Security Title 6 Domestic Security 102. Construction; severability Release date: 2005-05-18 Any provision of this chapter held to be invalid or unenforceable by its terms, or as applied to any person or circumstance, shall be construed so as to give it the maximum effect permitted by law, unless such holding shall be one of utter invalidity or unenforceability, in which event such provision shall be deemed severable from this chapter and shall not affect the remainder thereof, or the application of such provision to other persons not similarly situated or to other, dissimilar circumstances. 26 7852. Other applicable rules (a) Separability clause.--If any provision of this title, or the application thereof to any person or circumstances, is held invalid, the remainder of the title, and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected thereby. NRS 0.020 Severability. 1. If any provision of the Nevada Revised Statutes, or the application thereof to any person, thing or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the

provisions or application of NRS which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of NRS are declared to be severable. 2. The inclusion of an express declaration of severability in the enactment of any provision of NRS or the inclusion of any such provision in NRS, does not enhance the severability of the provision so treated or detract from the severability of any other provision of NRS. (Added to NRS by 1977, 166) Noticeably severability and/or separability are essential stipulations to contracting, as well, prerequisites within our claim. Why, you ask? I answer: Art.18.5 is not Art.110.1 See; 31 5103. Legal tender Release date: 2005-10-11. United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues. Foreign gold or silver coins are not legal tender for debts. Prior to the close of the civil war marriages were recorded by certification rather than license. As a third party enforcing their Parens Patriae doctrine weve quite literally allowed the governor to become the guardian of our morals. By our own hands weve altered our status settling for an inadequate [replacement property]. I can prove this by directing your attention to the following statute NRS 120.060 Effect of disclaimer. Unless otherwise provided by an express [reference] to the possibility of a disclaimer in the will, inter vivos trust, exercise of the power of appointment, or other written instrument creating or finally determining an interest, the interest disclaimed, and any future interest which is to take effect in possession or enjoyment at or after the termination of the interest disclaimed shall descend, go, be distributed or continue to be held as if the beneficiary disclaiming had predeceased the person creating the interest. [Did you get that?] In every case, the disclaimer relates back for all purposes to the date of the creation of the interest. (Added to NRS by 1979, 221) That, my friend, is proof beyond all doubt that the original interests were indeed created by the grantor generation. That [interest] was a futures, commodities, and stock option in the capital account. If the minor beneficiary makes a disclaimer we pre-decease the creator of that interest. In other words, we died before great (6xs 1780s) grandpa. Perhaps the following appears contrary to our agenda but upon a more in depth study look at what we find: NRS 120.070 Acceptance of interest precludes disclaimer. 1. A disclaimer may not be made after the beneficiary has accepted the interest [*1] to be disclaimed, but an acceptance does not preclude a beneficiary from thereafter disclaiming all or part of any interest to which he became entitled because another person disclaimed an interest,[*2] if the beneficiary had no knowledge of the interest. 2. For the purposes of this chapter, if a disclaimer has not theretofore been filed, a beneficiary has accepted an interest if he:

(a) Makes a voluntary assignment or transfer of, or contract to assign or transfer, the interest or any part thereof; (b) Executes a written waiver of the right to disclaim the interest; or (c) Sells or otherwise disposes of the interest or any part thereof pursuant to judicial process. (Added to NRS by 1979, 222) [*1] What interest? I was unaware of this interest when filing my original return, werent you? [*2] Because our parents disclaimed grandpas interest doesnt mean we have to accept the replacement property. Neither mom, dad, grandma or grandpa can write our will since is we who must do this for ourselves. Everybody has a choice of whether to disclaim or accept, but what if we were purposefully deceived and deprived of making a knowledgeable decision? I answer, see 262518 Disclaimers. NRS 120.080 Right to disclaim: Spendthrift provisions and similar restrictions. The right to disclaim exists irrespective of any limitation imposed on the interest of a beneficiary in the nature of an expressed or implied spendthrift provision or similar restriction. (Added to NRS by 1979, 222) The entire revocation process is right there! It is?! youre probably thinking to yourself. We didnt know the Constitution was a trust, the Bill of Rights was a will, or there was a complete takeover of the House of Representatives. How many of us realize the govt creates a spendthrift trust when sentenced to prison or that the 14th amendment is a spendthrift trust? We know we carry an interest in our grandparents and great grandparents simply because we carry their name, but how many of us were fully aware of that responsibility, or what this system is really designed to do? I believe youre beginning to understand the significance within the statement, "The Government claimed, among other things, that its lien had attached to the husband's interest in the tenancy by the entirety." My studies dictate arguing procedural defects in courts of limited jurisdiction is not a winning proposition for us. Dont we want to [perfect the security]? Well, foremost is the issue of a correct jurisdiction/court coupled with a correct knowledge of his-story. NRS 120.090 Disclaimer of interest arising before April 16, 1979. Any interest created before April 16, 1979, which has not been accepted may be disclaimed in the manner provided in this chapter. (Added to NRS by 1979, 222) First of all, were we aware there was a transfer in the interest of a property to the control, use and care of another? Did we know we were the representatives and [life estate] in perpetuity of a grantor donor through which we hold an [interest in the tenancy] [by the entirety] of His [closely held family owned business interest]? I could go on with

several points identifying the contract as invalid but I think youre beginning to get my point, especially if youre still reading at this point of the series. Below is the UCC (uniform commercial code) under the NRS (Nevada Revised Statutes). Ill assume most are aware of this before now so Ill touch on just a few of the basics. The common law finds its source within the Magna Charta, banking laws, principle, good faith, reliance, trust, commercial transactions, & commerce. NEVADA REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 104 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODEORIGINAL ARTICLES NRS 104.1102 Purposes; rules of construction; variation by agreement. 1. This chapter shall be liberally construed and applied to promote its under-lying purposes and policies. 2. Underlying purposes and policies of this chapter are: (a) To simplify, clarify and modernize the law governing commercial transactions. (b) To permit the continued expansion of commercial practices through custom, usage and agreement of the parties. (c) To make uniform the law among the various jurisdictions.[*A] 3. The effect of provisions of this chapter may be varied by agreement, except as otherwise provided in this chapter and except that the obligations of good faith, diligence, reasonableness and care prescribed by this chapter may not be disclaimed by agreement but the parties may by agreement determine the standards by which the performance of such obligations is to be measured if such standards are not manifestly unreasonable. 4. The presence in certain provisions of this chapter of the words unless otherwise agreed or words of similar import does not imply that the effect of other provisions may not be varied by agreement under subsection 3. 5. In this chapter unless the context otherwise requires: (a) Words in the singular number include the plural, and in the plural include the singular. (b) Words of the masculine gender include the feminine and the neuter, and when the sense so indicates words of the neuter gender may refer to any gender.[*B] (Added to NRS by 1965, 777) [*A] What power lacked to make uniform laws among the various jurisdictions? The simple answer: The Buck Act, a transaction occurring within a federal area. This entire chapter of the NRS deals solely with transactions. [*B] Youll notice the statutes here are similar to those in the IRC. Single includes plural, plural includes singular, neuter gender may refer to any gender, masculine gender includes feminine gender etc. Were all one big happy family! NRS 104.1103 Supplementary general principles of law applicable. Unless displaced by the particular provisions of this chapter, the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relative to capacity to contract, principal and

agent, estoppel, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, bankruptcy, or other validating or invalidating cause shall supplement its provisions. (Added to NRS by 1965, 777) NRS 104.1104 Construction against implicit repeal. This chapter being a general act intended as a unified coverage of its subject matter, no part of it shall be deemed to be impliedly repealed by subsequent legislation if such construction can reasonably be avoided. (Added to NRS by 1965, 777) NRS 104.1105 Territorial application of this chapter; parties power to choose applicable law. 1. Except as otherwise provided in this section, when a transaction bears a reasonable relation to this State and also to another state or nation, the parties may agree that the law of this State or of such other state or nation governs their rights and duties. Failing such agreement, this chapter applies to transactions bearing an appropriate relation to this State. 2. Where one of the following provisions of this chapter specifies the applicable law, that provision governs and a contrary agreement is effective only to the extent permitted by the law (including the conflict of laws rules) so specified: Rights of creditors against sold goods. NRS 104.2402. Applicability of the article on leases. NRS 104A.2105 and 104A.2106. Applicability of the article on bank deposits and collections. NRS 104.4102. Letters of credit. NRS 104.5116. Applicability of the article on investment securities. NRS 104.8110. Law governing perfection, the effect of perfection or nonperfection and the priority of security interests and agricultural liens. NRS 104.9301 to 104.9307, inclusive. Governing law in the article on funds transfers. NRS 104A.4507. (Added to NRS by 1965, 777; A 1973, 928; 1989, 369, 721; 1991, 410, 411; 1997, 373; 1999, 365; 2001, 709) NRS 104.1106 Remedies to be liberally administered. 1. The remedies provided by this chapter shall be liberally administered to the end that the aggrieved party may be put in as good a position as if the other party had fully performed but neither consequential or special nor penal damages may be had except as specifically provided in this chapter or by other rule of law. 2. Any right or obligation declared by this chapter is enforceable by action unless the provision declaring it specifies a different and limited effect. (Added to NRS by 1965, 778) NRS 104.1107 Waiver or renunciation of claim or right after breach. Any claim or right arising out of an alleged breach can be discharged in whole or in part without consideration by a written waiver or renunciation signed and delivered by the aggrieved party.

(Added to NRS by 1965, 778) Are we not aggrieved by the many alterations having transpired since Lincoln? Were we fully aware of all the implications, impositions, and conditions placed upon our grandparents, parents and selves? NRS 104.1108 Severability. If any provision or clause of this chapter or application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the chapter which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this chapter are declared to be severable. (Added to NRS by 1965, 778) Contained within the severability statement is our ability to seek a declaratory judgment proclaiming our sovereign status, i.e. not subject. Its the tax exempt entities that are considered customers of the IRS. The rest are mere taxpayers as defined in 267701(a)(14) Taxpayer.--The term "taxpayer" means any person subject to any internal revenue tax. NRS 104.1110 Provisions for transition. 1. Transactions validly entered into before March 1, 1967, and the rights, duties and interests flowing from them remain valid thereafter and may be terminated, completed, consummated or enforced as required or permitted by any statute or other law amended or repealed by this chapter as though such repeal or amendment had not occurred. 2. A transaction arising out of or associated with a letter of credit that was issued before October 1, 1997[1], and the rights, obligations and interests flowing from that transaction are governed by the former provisions of this chapter as if the amendment effective October 1, 1997, had not occurred, and may be terminated, completed, consummated or enforced under those former provisions. 3. Rights and obligations that arose after March 1, 1967, and before October 1, 1991, under NRS 104.6101 to 104.6111, inclusive, [2] Uniform Commercial Code-Bulk Transfers, remain valid and may be enforced as though those sections had not been repealed.[3] (Added to NRS by 1965, 778; A 1969, 105; 1973, 929; 1991, 411; 1997, 373; 1999, 365) [1] Why the significance placed on the years 1997and 1967? [2] Although we find NRS 104.6101 to 104.6111 have indeed been repealed contracts arising under such continue to be valid as if those sections had never been repealed. Isnt this same language found in the IRC? [3] From BBCOA (better books and cassettes of America) Cracking the Code, 3rd ed. Commercial Law is the economic extension of natural law into mans social world and deals with the fundamental principles of human interaction concerning proof of claim (dispute over title) and resolution of disputes. The fundamental purpose of Commercial Law is to maintain the commercial harmony, integrity, and continuity of society,

sometimes also stated as to maintain the peace and dignity of the State. Over the millennia these principles have been discovered through experience and distilled and codified into ten (10) fundamental maxims. There is no legal issue or dispute possible which is not a function of one or more of these principles. The UCC is a particular codification of Commercial Law, oriented towards the contemporary legal, financial, monetary, and banking systems. The entirety of world commerce now functions in accordance with the UCC-version of Commercial Law. Last known address: 19528 Ventura Blvd. #584, Tarzana, CA 91356 Part 2 General Definitions and Principles of Interpretation NRS 104.1201 General definitions. Subject to additional definitions contained in the subsequent articles of this chapter which are applicable to specific articles or parts thereof, and unless the context otherwise requires, in this chapter: 1. Action in the sense of a judicial proceeding includes recoupment, counterclaim, setoff, suit in equity and any other proceedings in which rights are determined. 2. Aggrieved party means a party entitled to resort to a remedy.[our estates been altered!] 3. Agreement means the bargain of the parties in fact as found in their language or by implication from other circumstances [label??] including course of dealing or usage of trade or course of performance as provided in this chapter (NRS 104.1205 and 104.2208). Whether an agreement has legal consequences is determined by the provisions of this chapter, if applicable; otherwise by the law of contracts (NRS 104.1103). (Compare contract.) 4. Bank means any person engaged in the business of banking. 5. Bearer means the person in possession of an instrument, document of title, or security payable to bearer or endorsed in blank. 6. Bill of lading means a document evidencing the receipt of goods for shipment issued by a person engaged in the business of transporting or forwarding goods, and includes an airbill. Airbill means a document serving for air transportation as a bill of lading does for marine or rail transportation, and includes an air consignment note or air waybill. 7. Branch includes a separately incorporated foreign branch of a bank. 8. Burden of establishing a fact means the burden of persuading the triers of fact that the existence of the fact is more probable than its nonexistence. 9. Buyer in ordinary course of business means a person that buys goods in good faith, without knowledge that the sale violates the rights of another person in the goods, and in the ordinary course from a person, other than a pawnbroker, in the business of selling goods of that kind. A person buys goods in the ordinary course if the sale to him comports with the usual or customary practices in the kind of business in which the seller is engaged or with the sellers own usual or customary practices. A person that sells oil, gas, or other minerals at the wellhead or minehead is in the business of selling goods of that kind. A buyer in ordinary course of business may buy for cash or by exchange of other property or on secured or unsecured credit and may acquire goods or documents of

title under a preexisting contract for sale. Only a buyer that takes possession of the goods or has a right to recover the goods from the seller under article 2 may be a buyer in ordinary course of business. A person that acquires goods in a transfer in bulk or as security for or in total or partial satisfaction of a money debt is not a buyer in ordinary course of business. 10. A term or clause is conspicuous when it is so written that a reasonable person against whom it is to operate ought to have noticed it. A printed heading in capitals (as: NONNEGOTIABLE BILL OF LADING) is conspicuous. Language in the body of a form is conspicuous if it is in larger or other contrasting type or color. But in a telegram any stated term is conspicuous. Whether a term or clause is conspicuous or not is for decision by the court. 11. Contract means the total legal obligation which results from the parties agreement as affected by this chapter and any other applicable rules of law. (Compare agreement.) 12. Creditor includes a general creditor, a secured creditor, a lien creditor and any representative of creditors, including an assignee for the benefit of creditors, a trustee in bankruptcy, a receiver in equity and an executor or administrator of an insolvent debtors or assignors estate. 13. Defendant includes a person in the position of defendant in a cross-action or counterclaim. 14. Delivery with respect to instruments, documents of title, chattel paper or securities means voluntary transfer of possession. [Doctor delivers what? Besides infants he delivers documents to the state as the states registrar, does he not? Our mother is simply his informant. Didnt she in fact deliver us up to the STATE? A new land identified by the boundaries of height and weight on piece of paper. How many doctors know these facts? 15. Document of title includes bill of lading, dock warrant, dock receipt, warehouse receipt or order for the delivery of goods, and also any other document which in the regular course of business or financing is treated as adequately evidencing that the person in possession of it is entitled to receive, hold and dispose of the document and the goods it covers. To be a document of title a document must purport to be issued by or addressed to a bailee and purport to cover goods in the bailees possession which are either identified or are fungible portions of an identified mass. 16. Fault means wrongful act, omission or breach. 17. Fungible with respect to goods or securities means goods or securities of which any unit is, by nature or usage of trade, the equivalent of any other like unit. Goods which are not fungible shall be deemed fungible for the purposes of this chapter to the extent that under a particular agreement or document unlike units are treated as equivalents. 18. Genuine means free of forgery or counterfeiting. 19. Good faith means honesty in fact in the conduct or transaction concerned. 20. Holder with respect to a negotiable instrument means the person in possession if the instrument is payable to bearer or, in the case of an instrument payable to an identified person, if the identified person is in possession. Holder with respect to a

document of title means the person in possession if the goods are deliverable to bearer or to the order of the person in possession. 21. To honor is to pay or to accept and pay, or where a credit so engages to purchase or discount a draft complying with the terms of the credit. We simply fail to understand when signing up to play their game we pledge our honor, fortune, income, and body i.e. [an interest in the tenancy by the entirety]. Having the mere benefit of attending a public fool system and/or obtaining vaccines is a credit, a tax that hasnt been paid yet, remember? 22. Insolvency proceedings includes any assignment for the benefit of creditors or other proceedings intended to liquidate or rehabilitate the estate of the person involved. 23. A person is insolvent who either has ceased to pay his debts in the ordinary course of business or cannot pay his debts as they become due or is insolvent within the meaning of the federal bankruptcy law. 24. Money means a medium of exchange authorized or adopted by a domestic or foreign government and includes a monetary unit of account established by an intergovernmental organization or by agreement between two or more nations. TIDBIT: Auto Insurance is an Archer MSA Medical Savings Account Old Age. Every dollar paid in auto insurance is returnable through the proper revocation process. Gasoline is a futures interest Oil from Alaska belongs to whom? Ill summarize the above to say, its no coincidence that the IRC refers to the Merchant Marine Act of 1936. Remember, Im not a lawyer and I refuse to give legal advice. Any points conveyed herein are nothing more than the expressed written opinions of a self educated highschool dropout. Disgruntled? Perhaps, but I have no intention of selling, buying, teaching, instructing or assisting strangers with their particular dilemmas. That said; concerning the Declaration of Citizenship my mind dictates several requisites are crucial to mount a proper defense, rebuttal or claim. Necessary Revocations: 1. Board of Directors for any and all corporations filed with the STATE 2. Selective Service revocation letter. 3. Voters registration 4. (At this time I dont believe it necessary to withdraw driver, marriage, pilot, boat, etc., licenses since rescission is included as an effect of our efforts.) After weve completed the above steps we need to publish in the newspaper and/or record with the country recorders office our Declaration of Citizenship. By sending a copy of the 'recorders documents and/or newspaper clippings to the Secretary of our STATE, he then sends an Apostil for a fee of ten federal reserve notes, here in Nevada. An additional bonus to our efforts is when recorded in a different state than we may reside. For example, its possible to record it in a county within California yet send the publications to Nevada Secretary of STATE. Of course, the Secretary of STATE is notified by Registered Mail which means under lock and key, stamped on all four sides

under a supposedly secured delivery. It might be worthwhile to follow up by sending a duplicate copy to a trustworthy friend with instructions to secure it unopened. PURGED! from the voters registration. If by letter Registered, if by person go with friendwitness and obtain a Raised Stamp seal with a time stamp. They will want the original and return to you a copy, but thats ok, get the copy time stamped as well. Due to error or mistake not willful disregard we revoke and change. We want to be assessed according to our actual status, not by a disclaimer were unaware exists. Thus, fraud by ignorance wrought upon us through our parents and grandparents at the hands of Mr. Lincoln himself. Regards, Ken