Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Broken Symmetry Phase Transition in Solid P-H, O-D and HD: Crystal Field Effects
Broken Symmetry Phase Transition in Solid P-H, O-D and HD: Crystal Field Effects
" /
"
+0.1(
(0) the
estimate discussed above gives a value for the
transition pressure that is in accord with experi-
ment. In the previous approach (Refs. [8,9]) the CF
was treated as a parameter of theory; it was shown
that for the reduced CF (crystal to molecular eld
ratio) of !0.13, !0.14, the theory gives correct
range of values for the transition pressure.
We have calculated the MF and CF constants
U
"
and U
was cal-
culated taking into account both the deviation of
the c/a ratio from the ideal HCP value of ((8/3)
[15] and a monoclinic distortion of the lattice [14].
The calculated value for the reduced crystal eld of
!0.1 is in accord with the range of values obtained
from ts to experimental data [8,9].
Yu.A. Freiman et al. / Physica B 265 (1999) 1215 13
The second-degree term of the crystal-eld inter-
action in a rigid hcp lattice can be written in the
form [16]
''
"!(4/5)
`"
()
M
B(R
M
)
`"
(
M
). (1)
Here the sum extends over all molecules around
a central molecule; its orientation "(
"
,
"
) is
specied by a polar angle
"
relative to the c-axis
and an azimuthal angle
"
relative to the a-axis,
M
"(
M
,
M
) denotes the orientations of the near-
est-neighbor molecules, B(R) is the radial function
of the single-molecule term in the anisotropic pair
potential, and R is the nearest-neighbor distance at
the given pressure.
In the case of an ideal HCP lattice, the
A?
com-
ponent of the CF vanishes. Let us consider the CF
to rst order in
A
"c/a!((8/3). The resulting
equation for the CF takes the form
A?
"!(3/2)``(4/5)`R(dB/dR)
A
`"
(
"
). (2)
In addition to the deviation of the c/a ratio from
the ideal HCP value, there could be anothersource
of the CF, namely, a monoclinic distortion of the
lattice, when the b/a ratio deviates from the ideal
HCP value of (3. This distortion produces for the
CF
@?
"!((3/2)(4/5)`R(dB/dR)
K
`"
(
"
), (3)
where
''
"
A?
#
@?
"!R(dB/dR)*
`"
(
"
) where
*"(4/5)`[(3/2)`
#(1/(3)
]. Thus, the
CF interaction is dened by the product of two
factors: R(dB/dR) and *. The rst one could be
estimated using the leading term of the analytical
model expression B(R)"exp(
R#
R)
[16,17] where the coecients are
"
"!1.3252
bohr ;
"
"!1.9292;
"
"3.8103 bohr. Taking
into account the contribution from the multipole
interactions for p-H
`
at the transition pressure
(110 GPa), we obtained the following estimate:
RdB/dR+!4.34;10` K. To estimate * we used
the experimental data of Loubeyre et al. [15] for
the pressure dependence of the c/a ratio and data
on b/a ratio from ab initio molecular dynamic
simulations by Kohano et al. [14]. As can be
deduced from Ref. [15], the deviation of the c/a
ratio from the ideal HCP value is a linear func-
tion of pressure:
"!0.017).
As a result, we obtain for the reduced crystal eld
"
/
"
+!0.1 which is in an excellent agree-
ment with the value estimated from a t to the
experimental data [8,9]. Though it is dicult to
judge the accuracy of our result, the order of
the magnitude and (most important) the sign of the
crystal eld are correct.
In summary, we nd that the Hamiltonian of the
system contains a negative crystal eld term that
originates from single-molecular components in the
intermolecular potential, and we have calculated
the magnitude of this term. Neglecting the CF is the
main cause of the systematic underestimation of the
transition pressure characteristic of all theories of
the BSP transition. The deformation of the lattice
giving rise to the negative CF is a response of the
lattice to the applied pressure which is in accord
with the general Le ChatelierBraun principle.
This research was supported in part by NSF
(Grant DMR-9624050) and by Polish Committee
for Scientic Research (Grant 2 PO3B 14210).
References
[1] H.K. Mao, R.J. Hemley, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66 (1994) 671.
[2] J.C. Raich, R.D. Etters, J. Low Temp. Phys. 6 (1972)
229.
[3] I.F. Silvera, R.J. Wijngaarden, Phys. Lett. 47 (1981) 39.
[4] H.E. Lorenzana, I.F. Silvera, K.A. Goettel, Phys. Rev. Lett.
64 (1990) 1939.
[5] F. Moshary, N.H. Chen, I.F. Silvera, Phys. Rev. Lett. A 71
(1993) 3814.
[6] Yu.A. Freiman, V.V. Sumarokov, A.P. Brodyanskii,
A. Jezowski, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 3 (1991) 3855.
[7] Yu.A. Freiman, S. Tretyak, A. Jezowski, J. Low Temp.
Phys. 110 (1998) 147.
[8] Yu.A. Freiman, S. Tretyak, A. Jezowski, R.J. Hemley, J.
Low Temp. Phys. 24 (1998) 518.
[9] Yu.A. Freiman, S. Tretyak, A. Jezowski, R.J. Hemley, J.
Low Temp. Phys. 113 (1998) 723.
[10] Ad Lagendijk, I.F. Silvera, Phys. Lett. 84 A (1981) 28.
[11] M. Sprik, M.L. Klein, J. Chem. Phys. 81 (1984) 6207.
[12] W.B.J.M. Janssen, A. van der Avoird, Phys. Rev. B 42
(1990) 838.
14 Yu.A. Freiman et al. / Physica B 265 (1999) 1215
[13] H. Nagara, T. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 (1992)
2468.
[14] J. Kohano, S. Scandolo, G.L. Chiarotti, E. Tosatti, Phys.
Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 2783.
[15] P. Loubeyre et al., Nature 383 (1997) 702.
[16] J. V an Kranendonk, Solid Hydrogen, Plenum Press, New
York, 1983.
[17] I.F. Silvera, V.V. Goldman, J. Chem. Phys. 69 (1978) 4209.
[18] A.P. Brodyanskii, V.V. Sumarokov, Yu.A. Freiman,
A. Jezowski, Low Temp. Phys. 19 (1993) 368.
Yu.A. Freiman et al. / Physica B 265 (1999) 1215 15