Development of a System-Grounded Criterion of Optimal Control

I. Lutsenko
Enterprises as structures combining great number of controlled systems are
created to meet their organizers requirements in the form of a profit at the expense
of the possibility to use a generated cash flow.
It is quite natural that enterprise organizers seek to maximize their
potentialities opportunities resulted from the earned profit. Accordingly, they seek
to maximize receipt sizes within the certain time period by optimizing an
enterprises controlled systems.
But at present the operation mode of most of controlled systems is rather far
from being optimal. On the one hand it is caused by the nature of design that does
not allow of optimal control; on the other hand it is due to absence of an efficiency
index that can be used as a criterion of optimal (the best for production structure
organizers) control.
Here is the way the problem of optimal control criterion was treated last
century: Engineers, researchers, economists and designers are continuously
suggesting new universal, accurate and clear objective functions. One of the
authors succeeded in gathering over 100 criteria of optimizing division processes.
in 1967. After their classification it has become clear that there is no universal
criterion and choosing a process optimization or effectiveness criterion is quite a
complicated task [1].
For example, according to the process-oriented standard ISO series
9000:2000 efficiency is defined as gained results-consumed resources
relationship [2].
As is seen, the situation has not changed. Even that fundamental document
only defines efficiency at the conceptual level.
This paper is aimed at developing the estimation theory to work out the
resource efficiency index which can be used as a system-grounded criterion of
optimal control.
Direct Estimating Technology for a Controlled System Efficiency
As regards the controlled system studied (that is defined as the executive
system ES) there can be also determined an input product feed system and an
output product consumption system (Fig.1).
Product feed system Executive system Product consumption system
Fig.1. Controlled system interaction
Three types of objects circulate among the controlled systems
technological products (
i
r
- input products of ES, j
p
- output products of ES),
exchange products ( d - input exchange products of ES,
s
- output exchange
products of ES) and control signals.
By-turn control signals can be divided into exchange process control ( k ,
x
)
and technological process control ones (
z
,
u
).
Any ES solves two problems simultaneously providing a consumption
system with its output products and maximizing the control effect.
Control effect maximization (at the expense of more effective resource
utilization) is provided due to the fact that ES output product can be formed
through different types of control; each of them has its own correlation of input
products and its own process time.
If an enterprise keeps its resources and is efficient, its financial potential
grows due to the accrual of funds. At a certain moment of time this potential is
determined as the sum of raw stock and trade stock costs, fixed assets costs
including depreciation, the balance of funds, paid but not yet received raw and
energy products and so on after deduction of budgetary payments, payments for
input products (raw and energy ones), payments of wages and taxes and so on.
It is the change in an enterprises financial potential level at a certain
moment that enables to estimate direct the control process efficiency but just on
average (an enterprise, as a rule, consists of a number of controlled systems) and
with rather a great error.
As it is the maximization of the financial potential rate that is the goal of
setting up an enterprise, it is necessary to control an enterprises ES in the way that
will enable to maximize the financial potential increase within the certain period of
time. From an owners point of view this mode of an enterprise functioning is the
most efficient.
To control the financial potential level it would seem possible to use
accounting potentialities. Accounting methods enables to estimate and fix the
initial financial condition of an enterprise. Such methods provide for record of
initial funds, raw and trade stock in comparable cost values and it will also provide
their movement while the systems functioning.
But even if an enterprise consists of the only controlled system, errors in
estimating the finance potential are rather considerable.
Errors arise, for instance, at the stage of accounting cost values of fixed
assets depreciation. There are various methods of calculating depreciation to
determine depreciation value. But depreciation indices do not depend on the mode
of fixed assets exploitation. Tear and wear of instruments, especially depending on
the operation mode, is not provided for in accounting.
If equal amounts have been invested into different directions then in a
definite period of time economic analysis will make it possible to estimate resource
efficiency as a result of the control, i.e. to estimate the correctness of the chosen
direction, an enterprises dislocation, operation mode of the equipment and so on.
Besides, accounting methods only allows of estimating consequences of the
made decisions. It is impossible to use them for solving control tasks in practice as
it is impossible to restore the initial condition of an open system and then, in a
given time, obtain another result after changing control.
A number of objective moments prevent it.
Firstly, demand for an enterprises products has probabilistic nature.
Secondly, the average value of demand for finished products changes with the
lapse of time. Besides, not only automated systems operate at an enterprise but
also personnel whose knowledge, skills, motivations and so on are changeable. Tax
legislation as well as input product prices change, too; production and exchange
system processes are asynchronous. Also, results are long to expect.
The list of objective reasons can be considerably broadened but the above-
mentioned ones are enough to understand the main point.
The way out of this situation lies in developing the system of direct
determining conditional financial potential of internal (closed) controlled systems
of an enterprise (but not an enterprise as a whole). The systems should be
automated at that, where the human factor can be neglected. Within those systems
research results can be repeated many times by setting the necessary mode of feed
and consumption of transformation products.
There are no exchange products in the closed systems and that is why
exchange product movement among associated closed systems is replaced by
conditional exchange product movement.
Input product cost for the studied technological process at a certain moment
of time is determined in the following way:
( )
0
1
( )
t
I
i i
i
t
re t rs rq t dt

1
1
1
]

,
where
i
- input product identifier;
I - number of significant input products;
( )
i
rq t
- account parameter of an input product;
i
rs
- cost estimation of an account parameter of an input product;
( ) re t
- current value of a cumulative cost estimate of input products.
By-turn cost estimation of output products of the studied process at certain
moment is determined as follows:
( )
0
1
( )
t
J
j j
j
t
pe t ps pq t dt

1
1
1
]

,
where
j
- output product identifier;
J - number of significant output products;
( )
j
pq t
- account parameter of an output product;
j
ps
- cost estimation of an account parameter of an output product;
( ) pe t
- current value of cumulative cost estimates of output products.
Signals
( ) re t
and
( ) pe t
are control signals for the system of feeding
conditional exchange products of the consumption system and cumulative system
of direct control efficiency estimation. Relation between control signals and
quantitative parameters of conditional exchange products is as follows:
( ) ( ) de t re t
;
( ) ( ) se t pe t
The mathematical model of the system for determining conditional financial
potential of ES can be presented as follows
[ ]
1 1
0 0 0
( ) ( ) ( )
f f f
T T T
L L
l l
l l
t t t
F M C de t dt se t dt z U t dt


1
1
+ + +
1
]


.
F - financial potential of the studied closed system at the moment f
T
;
M - initial volume of funds in cost values;
f
T
- moment at which the conditional finance condition of the system is
determined;
l
C
- moment at which the conditional finance condition of the system l at the
moment
0 t
;
L - number of accountable mechanisms of the system studied;
l - mechanism identifier of the system studied;
de - conditional exchange product transferred by the consumption system;
se
- conditional exchange product transferred by the feed system;
[ ]
l
z U
- mechanism l depreciation intensity depending on control.
The structure providing implementation of the designed concept is given in Fig.2
Fig.2.
The
system
flow
block
that
provides forming of conditional financial potential
The figure shows some change of ES conditional financial potential under
heating process control change. Control change and recording of current meaning
of ES conditional financial state have resulted in a diagram on fig.3.
Fig.3. Trajectory of ES financial potential change depending on a type of control
Figure 4 shows that ES is aimed at the mode ensuring function maximum F
(U). But it is necessary to set a prolonged time period to get optimal control.
Fig.4. Level of ES conditional financial potential at a fixed time moment t=10000
s.

It should be noted that the only way to implement the method of optimal
control search is to use closed systems.
Since the model and process duration cannot be implemented, and since
practical use of direct methods of control system efficiency estimation is not
available correct choice of control criterion should be made. The criterion should
point at the most efficient functioning mode as one that is based on comparative
estimation results of separate processes of studied control systems.
To solve the problem of the universal criterion of optimal control it is
necessary to test certain indices claiming to be efficiency indices to decide whether
they can point out the most efficient functioning mode of operated system. To
settle the task the method of direct efficiency estimation is needed.
Research based on search extremal operated system has shown that an
expense index, a conditional profit index or a conditional profitability index used
as control criteria have identical results and set control system by means of
implementing a search mode at the level of 8 units.
Fig.5. Control change in search mode using economic indices as optimization
criteria
Figure 5 shows that this control mode is not optimal one being set in the
range of 11 units. Consequently, it is necessary to develop the index of resource
use efficiency.
3.1 AGREED AND REDUCED OPERATIONS
Any process as well as a continuous process can be presented as
consequence of processes.
Further research is based on agreed operations. It is necessary to define the
meaning of these operations.
Agreed operations are those whose integral values of output products
registered characteristics at the moment of operations completion are equal to
relevant signals of the task, and ES input products are completely transformed into
output products.
Time moment corresponding to the complete transformation of input
products of an agreed operation is defined as moment of operations physical
completion (MOPC). MOPC is marked as t
f
on the diagrams.
In turn, any process can be presented as a reduced vector operation (fig.6).
Consequently, it is important to determine the amplitudes of ES input and output
signals
( )
1
f
s
t
I
i i
i
t
RE rs rq t dt

1
1

1
]

;
( )
1
f
s
t
J
j j
j
t
PE ps pq t dt

1
1

1
]

,
where RE and PE are the amplitudes of signals reflecting integral values of
registered characteristics and, therefore, of input and output products in
comparable values. An impulse signal RE is correlated with the moment of
process beginning (t
s
) and provides re(t) function forming, and an impulse signal
PE is correlated with MOPC to form the pe (t) function.
Fig.6. Model of a reduced operation as comparable registration signals
Using this operation model enables to gain some important data and at the
same time to develop resource use efficiency index (RUEI).
3.3 MOMENT OF OPERATIONS LOGIC COMPLETION
The two-flow model of a reduced operation based on the model on fig.6 can
be developed under consequent integration of the functions re (t) and pe (t)
0
( ) ( )
t
t
ire t re t dt
;
0
( ) ( )
t
t
ipe t pe t dt
.
ire(t) function is defined as resource consumption flow
ipe(t) function is defined as resource return flow
Fig.7. Model of a reduced operation as resource consumption
and resource return flows
Figure 8 shows a single flow model of a reduced operation with an
expression
0 0
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
t t
t t
ice t ire t ipe t re t dt pe t dt + +
.
Fig.8. Model of a reduced operation as a total flow
Input product transformation process requires certain time. For the studied
operation (Fig.6) it is 6 time periods. At the moment of physical complishing of
operation ( f
t
=8) the process of input products transformation is being finished.
Having studied single flow model of a reduced operation (Fig.8) it is
possible to say that its implementation is associated with losses determined by
input products time bounding. These losses, reflected by the closed flow of
involved resources, are bigger in case involved products cost estimation is higher
and the process of their transformation is longer.
Therefore, the closed flow geometry of negative half-plane reflects the loss
of control intended for goal achievement.
At the moment of f
t
physical complishing of operation executive system
(ES) gives input product to the consumption system. As the result resource return
flow is formed to be defined as the flow of resulted resource return ide (t).
ipe (t) flows maximum value of the efficient operation is bigger than ire (t)
flow maximum value. Due to the maximum values difference flow of resulted
resource return ide (t) is formed.
Maximum value of this flow is determined by the cost values difference of
total input and output products of operation. But involved resources flow ibe (t)
cannot be compensated by the cost estimation of the output product. Formal
analysis of measurement units shows it. Flow as a square has its unit of
measurement Cost x Time, and the output product p at the moment of its
introduction into consumption system has a dimension cost. Measurement units
of these categories are different that is why incomparable.
For example, involved resources flow ibe (t) and flow of resulted resource
return ide (t) can be compared. It is quite evident that operation cannot be
considered finished till flow of resulted resource return ide (t) compensates flow of
involved resources ibe (t).
For the studied operation this moment is t=20. At this moment flows square
ide (t) is equal to ibe (t) flows square. This moment is called the moment of
logical complishing of operation (MOLC) and marked as
l
t
.
It was possible to determine (MOLC) in this simple way only because an
amplitude of input and output signals for the studied reduced operation were
selected to compare flows square easily.
To determine MOLC of any efficient operation it is necessary to integrate
ibe (t)and ide (t)flows. The integral function of flows module of involved
resources ibe (t) is marked as vbe (t) and the integral function of flow of resulted
resource return ide (t) as vde (t). Then
0
( ) ( )
t
t
vbe t ibe t dt
;
0
( ) ( )
t
t
vde t ide t dt
(Fig.9).
Fig.9. Logical complishing moment determination of the operation by
integral functions of resource consumption and resulted resource
return flows
Integral functions vbe (t) and vde (t) unit of measurement is calculated by the
cost and time component product. This unit of measurement is marked as CT.
Thereby, charts of vbe (t) and vde (t) are intersected at the equality point of
ibe (t) and
ide (t )flows squares.
A moment of logical complishing of the operation can be defined as the
moment of integral functions equality from functions of involved resources flow
and flow of resulted resource return.
3.4. ANALYTICAL DETERMINATION OF THE MOMENT OF THE
REDUCED OPERATION LOGICAL COMPLISHING
MOLC determination based on involved resources flow ibe (t) and flow of
resulted return ide (t) gives the opportunity to realize one side of the process of
operations result gaining. However, it is possible to calculate MOLC
mathematically basing on resource consumption ire (t) and resource return flows
ipe (t) without interim transformation of these flows into ibe (t) and ide (t).
The integral function of flows module
( ) ire t
is marked as
( ) vre t
and the
integral function of flow
( ) ipe t
is marked as
( ) vpe t
(Fig. 10).
Fig.10. Determination of logical complishing moment of operation with
integral functions of resource consumption and resource return flows
( ) vre t
and
( ) vpe t
functions are intersected at the point we have defined as
MOLC.
MOLC determination with resource consumption and resource return flows
requires less number of operations.
Thereby, MOLC can be defined as integral functions equality moment from
functions of resource consumption and resource return flows. However, the
possibility of nonlinear functions
( ) vre t
and
( ) vpe t
replacement by linear functions
*
( ) vre t
and
*
( ) vpe t
(Fig.11), compared to significantly nonlinear functions vbe(t)
and vde (t), is of great importance.
Fig. 11. Determination of logical completion moment of operation with linear
functions
*
( ) vre t and
*
( ) vpe t
( ) ( )
* *
s
vre t ire t t C C +
r
, 3.4.1
( ) ( )
* *
f
vpe t ipe t t C C +
r
. 3.4.2
Constants
s
C
and f
C
are correspondingly calculated by the expressions
[ ]
*
s l l
C ire t t , 3.4.3
[ ]
*
f l l
C ipe t t . 3.4.4
Constant C determines a shift of functions
( )
*
vre t and
( )
*
vre t . For the
functions
( )
*
vre t and
( )
*
vre t (Fig.3.4.2) C=36.
onsidering (3.4.3, 3.4.4), expressions (3.4.1, 3.4.2) can be represented as
( ) [ ]
* * *
( )
l l
vre t ire t t ire t t C +
r
, 3.4.5
( ) [ ]
* * *
( )
l l
vpe t ipe t t ipe t t C +
r
. 3.4.6
From the expressions
( ) [ ]
* *
0
l l
ire t t ire t t C +
r
, 3.4.7
( ) [ ]
* *
0
l l
ipe t t ipe t t C +
r
. 3.4.8
time periods values are obtained when
( )
*
vre t and
( )
*
vpe t functions intersect it
[ ]
( )
[ ]
* *
/
s l l r
t ire t t C ire t
, 3.4.9
[ ]
( )
* *
/
f l l p
t ipe t t C ipe t
1

]
. 3.4.10
where
s
t
- intersection moment of time axis by
( )
*
vre t function;
f
t
- the moment of time axis intersection with the function
( )
*
vpe t .
It can be seen that the moment
s
t
corresponds to the input products registration
moment of the given operation, the moment f
t
corresponds to the output products
registration moment of the given operation.
The equation system is (3.4.11)
[ ] [ ]
[ ]
* *
* *
0
0
s s l l
f f l l
ire t t ire t t
ipe t t ipe t t

'
1

3.4.11
After solving the system relative to
l
t
the following equation can be obtained:
[ ]
[ ]
* *
* *
f f s s
l
f s
ipe t t ire t t
t
ipe t ire t
1

]

1

]
3.4.12
Taking into consideration that
*
f
ipe t
1
]
for reduced operations is numerically
equal to
f
pe t
1
]
or to
pe
,
[ ]
*
s
ire t is numerically equal to [ ]
s
re t
or to
re
, the
simpler expression can be used for numerical value of determining
l
t
.
f s
l
pe t re t
t
pe re

3.4.13
For instance , for the studied operation the following expression can be obtained:
3 8 2 2
20
3 2
f s
l
pe t re t
t
pe re




.
The equation (1) can be generally written for the operation logic completion
moment determination of any effective operation.
[ ]
0 0
0 0
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
f f
f f
t t
l
t t
pe t t dt re t t dt
t
pe t dt re t dt
1
]

3.4.14
In discrete systems of time reading the expression 3.4.14 will be
[ ] [ ]
1 1
1 1
K K
i i i i
k k
l
K K
i i
k k
pe t re t
n
pe re

3.4.15

3.5 Operation resource capacity
The operation logic completion moment determines the time for compensation of
resulted return flow with the resource return flow. However, this compensation
takes place only in value.
While examining the flow of linked resources ibe(t) and the resulted flow ide(t), it
can be seen that these flows are dispersed in time, therefore the operation logic
completion moment has irreplaceable control losses for ES.
These control losses can be determined as the integral function of mismatch at the
operation logic completion moment [3].
Thus, control losses as a closed flow of mismatch function
( ) dif t
can be
determined as the mismatch of the integral function of the involved resources flow
( ) vbe t
and the integral function of the resulted return flow
( ) vde t
, vectoral single-
flow model, within the interval from the beginning of the operation till the moment
of its logical completion (fig. 12).

Fig.12. Determination of the mismatch function with the usage a the single-flow
operation.
The equal approach is control losses determination by the mismatch of the integral
function for the resource consumption flow
( ) vre t
and the integral function for
resource return flow
( ) vpe t
within the interval from the beginning of the operation
till the moment of its logical completion (pic.13).
Fig.13. Determination of the mismatch function on the basis of a two-flow
operation.
The mismatch function of the operation given as the tuple can be determined:
( )
2, 2; 4, 8
s f
re t pe t
1. Operation logic completion moment is determined
f s
l
pe t re t
t
pe re

=20 .
2. The auxiliary variable

is introduced and determined

[ ]
0
;
l
t t
3. The two-flow operation model within the interval [ ]
0 0
;
l l
t t
(fig.3.5.3)
is:

0
( ) ( ) ire re dv

,
0
( ) ( ) ipe pe dv

integral functions of resource capacity and resource return flows within the interval
[ ]
0 0
;
l l
t t
( fig 3.5.4) are formed.

0 0
( ) ( ) vre re dv dv




,
0 0
( ) ( ) vpe pe dv dv



_

,

4. Control losses as the closed flow of mismatch within the interval from the
beginning of the operation till the moment of its logical completion is
determined. (fig. 14)
0 0 0 0
( ) ( ) ( ) dif re dv dv pe dv dv



_



,

.
Fig.14 Uncompensated control losses as the closed flow
6. The integral function of control losses is determined (fig.15)
0 0 0 0 0
( ) ( ) ( )
v
r re dv dv pe dv dv dv



1
_
1

1
,
]

Fig. 15. Function of resousecapacity of operation change
Lets define the value of integral function of losses
( ) r
at the moment of
(MLCO), as the value of resoucecapacity of operation. Then an expression for
resoucecapacity definition will have the following form
0 0 0 0 0
( ) ( )
l
t
t
R re dv dv pe dv dv dv



1
_
1

1
,
]

,
[0, ]
l
v t
(2.29)
R the value of resoucecapasity of operation.
The unit of measurement of resoucecapacity is .
3.6 ANALYTICAL DEFINITION OF RESOUCECAPACITY OF THE
REDUCED OPERATION
As far as resoucecapacity of reduced operation, in terms of geometrical
interpretation, is the square of triangle ABC (fig.16), for reduced technological
operation it can be defined as difference of triangles ABD and CBD.
Fig. 16. Geometrical interpretation of resource capacity of operation
Substituting function
( )
*
ire t t
r
and
( )
*
ipe t t
r
in expressions (3.4.5, 3.4.6)
scalar values
[ ]
*
s s
ire t t and
*
f f
ipe t t
1

]
, we get expressions
[ ] [ ]
* *
0
s s l l
ire t t ire t t C + , 3.6.1
[ ]
* *
0
f f l l
ipe t t ipe t t C
1
+
]
. 3.6.2
Forming them as the system of equations and solving relative to , we get an
expression for BD height definition.
[ ] [ ]
[ ]
* * * *
* *
.
s f s s f f
s f
ire t ipe t t ire t ipe t t
BD
ire t ipe t
1 1
] ]

1
]
As far as resource capacity of reduced operation we defined as difference of
right triangles, an expression for its definition will look like
( ) ( )
1 1
2 2
l s l f
R t t BD t t BD .
Substituting BD by its value from the expression after corresponding
transformations, we get
[ ] ( )
[ ]
( )
2
* *
* *
2
f s f s
f s
ipe t ire t t t
R
ipe t ire t
1
]

1
]
.
Taking into account that for reduced operations
*
f
ipe t
1
]
equals to the value
f
pe t
1
]
or to the value
pe
,
[ ]
*
s
ire t numerically equal [ ]
s
re t
or just the value
re
, to define the numerical value
l
t
one can use an expression, where the
values of signals of registration and moments of their formation are used.
( )
( )
2
2
r p
pe re t t
R
pe re

. 3.4.13
For example, for the operation under consideration (fig.2.18) we
get, (. 2.18)
( )
( )
2
3 2 36
108
2 2
r p
pe re t t
R
pe re




T
.
The value of resoucecapacity of resulted operation equals to the ratio of
product of cost estimation of value of the input product module and the output
product value and a squared difference value of the moments of their registration
to double value of difference of cost estimation of module value of input and
output products.
3.7 ABSOLUTE POTENTIAL EFFECT OF OPERATION
As it was mentioned, ES starts to get control effect from the moment of
logical conclusion of operation. Till this moment, resulted flow compensates losses
connected with the operation execution.
As the resulted flow is open, the potential effect of the operation within the
single interval can be determined.
Expression structure for the potential effect of the operation must correspond to
the expression structure for resource capacity.
Its necessary to gain the effect to maintain activity ES (ineffective systems die
in straight and figurative sense). The essence of CS (functioning for synthetic
CS) is in new operations formation. It means that formation of consequent
operations is based on the using in time the results of previous operations.
Therefore the potential effect of the operation (A) can be determined as the
potential resulted resource return within the single interval of time
t
from the
operation logic completion moment.
Thus,
d l
t t t +
The given operation shows the steps, which are necessary to determine absolute
potential effect of the operation ES
1. Operation logic completion moment can be determined:
f s
l
pe t re t
t
pe re

=20 .
2. The position of the right boundary point of the range of function definition is
20 1 21
d l
t t t + +
.
3. Auxiliary variables

can be introduced and determined

[ ]
0
;
d
t t
; [ ]
;
l d
t t
.
4. A single flow model of the operation can be formed
0 0
( ) ( ) ( ) ice pe s ds re s ds

+

,
. . c e
5. The function
( ) vde
within the interval [ ]
;
l d
t t
(fig. 17) can be determined
0 0
( ) ( ) ( )
l
t t t
vde pe s ds re s ds dv

1
1
+
1
]

.
Fig.17 Formation of the function
( ) vde

6. The function
( ) wde
within the interval [ ]
;
l d
t t
(fig.18)
0 0
( ) ( ) ( )
l l
t
t t t t
wde t pe s ds re s ds dv d

_
1

1
+

1
]
,

.
Fig. 18 Figure of function construction
( ) wde
Absolute potential effect of Executive system (ES) operation equals the
value of function
( ) wde
at a time moment
d
t
. So, an expression for absolute
potential effect of the function determination, in the case of vectorial presentation
of initial model, will have the following appearance
0 0
( ) ( )
d
l l
t
t t t t
A pe s ds re s ds dv d

_
1

1
+

1
]
,

.
On the assumption of geometrical interpretation of absolute potential effect
factor (APEF) (pic.18), effective factor value of the given operation, can be
defined from the following expression
[ ] [ ] ( ) ( ) / 2
l l i l d l
A ipe t ire t t t
1

]
,
Using the signals of registration we will get
( ) ( ) / 2
d l
A pe re t t 1
]
.
RESOURCE USE EFFICIENCY FACTOR
Definition of absolute potential effect and resource capacity of technological
operation allows to obtain resource use efficiency factor as a ratio
A
E
R

.
Substituting A and R for corresponding integral expressions we get
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
d
l
l
t
t
t
t
pe d re dv d d
E
re dv dv pe dv dv dv






_
1

1
+

1
]
,

1
_
1

1
,
]


,
[ ]
0 0 0 0 0
; ; ;
l d d
t t t t
;
0
[ , ]
d
v t t
;
[ , ]
l d
t t
;
0
[ , ]
l
t t
.
Resource use efficiency factor for the given operation we get in the form of
analytical expression
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( )
( )
( )
2
2 2
d d d l
s s
f f
ipe t ire t pe re t t
pe re
E
pe re t t pe re t t
1

]


.
Fig.19 Change of efficiency of control depending on types of control
Picture 19 shows the process of optimum of extreme system of control
search, used criterion is resource use efficiency factor. As its seen on the pic.20,
given control corresponds to the control where ES provides maximization of
conditioned financial potential.
Fig. 20 Change of control in the process of optimum search
Conclusion. Resource use efficiency factor which can be used as a criterion of
optimization, showing control that guarantees maximization of financial potential
of controlling system has been elaborated.
On the basis of produced estimation theory the grounds of economic theory can
be generated as well.
Literature:
1. .., ..
. .:, , 1978, .25
2. 9001
3. ..
//-
.