Bryan From:Ritchie, Sent WedMay26 22:56:Q82O1O Thorseth, C; Canagher, Jay Peter D PARTNER); Yeilding, Cindy; KateH (UNKNOWN BUSINESS

To:Baker, Kelly; Nguyen, Van; Binh H; Depret, Pierre-Andre McAughan, Martin Bondurant, L.; Charles Cc:Albertin, ; Skripnikova, Galina Scherschel, Craig; v1 MC252 Technical Memo Subsurface Subjed:DRAFT: lmportance: Normal Technical Memo v1.doc Attachments: MC252 Subsurface Kate Subsurface the Memorandum yourequested that regarding Post-well the Please attached Technical find to Tactical Response Sharepoint Description the Macondo of well. Thefilehasalsobeenuploaded theMacondo (http://gomdnc. > ments SubSurface. bpweb.bo. com/mtr) underSharedDocu put you (cc'ed) helped thisdocument who together while Thank to the Macondo Subsurface Team mernbers supporting ongoing the operations including: 1).Safe successful and execution Relief of Wells support TopKill for 2). Subsurface 3).Geochemicel support spillanalysis for geophysical acquisition options 4). Poteniial / requests. 5),Adclitional documentation thanks Many Bryan
Bryan D. Ritchie Exploration Team l..ader Eastern GoM WL4 2nd Floor 02674 Office: +l-281366-1567 Mobile:+132316.7192 http:/rconnect.bpweb.bp.comriie.asp?lO1tld01 828

Exhibit No. Worldwide Court Inc.

CONFIDENTIAL

BP-HZN- 9MDLo0 101 217 335

BPDI 5-061252 1

'[it!e.rl#.'$ ',*ir Fstmi+;6*nl SPU

#np

Technical Memorandum
TITLE: TO: Post-Well Subsurface Description Macondo of well (MC252) KateBaker, CindyYeilding, Thorseth, Jay PeterCarragher
Bryan Ritchie, Craig Scherschel,Galina Skripnikova

WRITTEN Marty BY: Albertin, ChuckBondurant, Kolly McAughan, Banh Nguyen van DATE: 25thMay2010

Prospect Name Surface Location Block No. BP well name

Macondo;

Mississipoi 252 Canvon MC252_1

OCS-G Wellnumber
Spud date on Marianas :i,.;.,';. ReleasedMarianasdue to Hurricanelda

ocs- G32306_01 ohoqtcberioog

2lh t'tovember 2009 1Oth February 2010

Cateqorv {Exol/Aporl
Total Depth (MDTTVD/TVSS)

Exploration
18,360' md / 18,349'l\td -18,274'tvdss I

EPApprovedbv MMS WaterDedh RotaryTableEbvation

Top ReservoirDeoth

04tc6,t2009
4,992 feet

75 feetRKB
18,065' / 18,054'tvd-17.965'tvdss md /

Reservoir Temperaturc Reseruoir Pressure GOR

API

90ft 236"F
p 11,850 si 3,000 scf/bbl 35

Version 1

BP Confidential

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

BP-HZN-21 7eMDL003s5 102

BPDI 15-061253

Macondo spud October6, 2009 Marlanas pulled off locatlon 27,2OO9 November After runningthe 18" casingand cementingthe same, the MarianasBOP failed a scheduled test. At the time of the failedtest, the 18" casing had been run and cemented. No open hole stackwas pulled. was exposed. A cementplug was set in the 28" casing,and the riser/BOP lda seasonhurricane formedin the While the BOP stackwas beingrepairedon deck, the late gulf. The well locationwas in the projected path of the hunicane. The Marianaswas had revealedextensive evacuated. Upon returningto the rig after the storm, inspections were damagedas of along the underside the rig. Thesewires/cables damageto wire/cables of the the hull. This ca.g99d sheathing the undersideof impacting the resultof waves/swells the wires/cables to be worn to the point that bare wires *ere exposed. After many of to assessingthe situationit was deemedthat the damagewas too exteneive performrepairs to on location. The rig was de-mooredand towed to a shipJardin'Mississippi performthe the'rig @ntractexpired. After finishing in repairs. While beingrepaired the shipyard, requisite the repairs, rig was released. ,..1':,11;'1,,; ri:, Well status attime the Marianas was pulled off location plug was set nearthe 28" casingshoe. The 18" casingwas run and cemented.A 200' cement well afterfinishing Horizon would finishdrilfingthe Macondo It was decidedthat the Deepwater at drillingoperations the Kodiakdiscovery. appraisal On tocation with the DeepwaterHorizon J a n u a r3 1 , 2 0 1 0 y l runningthe riser,and testing scheduleddrawworks and BOP maintenancq*. After performing the BOP on the wellhead,the Macondowellwas i+entered on February10,2010. Upon reentry, the cement plug set by the Marianaswas drillecl-dul After squeezingthe 18' casing Horizonbeganmakingnew hole on February15, 2010. shoe,the Deepwater

anddeffi of mainbrget Dateencountered at while wis en guntered-snrApnl4,2O1O drilling a depthof 18,065' The primary M.q8 target . i:,::. (MD)i18,0,S4i{Wol. tl,l.t.l,
' ,.,,r,r,

Date and depth of finat TD (TVD)on April9, 2010. (MDy18,349' a The Macondo well reached finalTD of 18,360' Post-TD opeqailons Afler reaching Tp, a full suite of wireline evaluationwas performed. Followingwireline the production was operations, casir,rg run and cemented. At the time of the incident, riserwas to in to-gqlrvrnaterpreparation unlatchfrom the wellheadand pull the riserlBOP beingdisplaced
StaCk. :i:rl

Version 1

BP Confidential

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

103 7eMD100335 BP-HZN-z1

BPDl 15-061254

Geoloqical description Theprimary target the Macondo for wellwasan amalgamated reliefchannel-levee low system of Middle Miocene (M56-13Ma)(Figure Thechannel age 1). system trends a north-west in to south-east direction overan elongated Mesozoic 4-wayridgethat strikes north-east southto west. Thetrapping elements a combination dip and stratigraphic. expected are of The facies arelowrelief channel-levee deposits vertical lateral with and connectivity.
{r ftriooraal'

fo st za
!t

.@

LFEfrN

l3

#EFkffi*
Eo

.ffilcrrrl "'

I nrt

f,trard hhff*dt

!fr

s3

Sfilul*

.@

.rEo

-aD

ns-

:Y
.rtrE -m -EO
hrrrt
ftt..o
ff

{EE

.t$fi"1
rffHrr .EE M .l{E tntl

khs x6a | ...| -@

M54 or*

13i t59 ?3J

ffil';;.;*'

Figure 1: Pre-drftl,,litftOts'tra,tigffiphy and dilling plan for MC0tg2-1 wett.

F*lrh!

FII*-

ffil**

The Macondowell discovered>90 feet of hydrocarbons the M57 and M56 sands, the in majorityoccuningin the M56D (22') and M56E (64.5) sands (Figure2). The depth structure and amplitude mapsfor the M56 and M57 intervals shown in Figures3 and 4. are

Version 1

BP Corfidential

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

BP-HZN-21 79MD100335 104

BPDII 5-061 255

t'.:.

.. ..
ll

Version 1

BP Confirlntial

CONFIDENTIAL HIGHLY

05 7eMD1003351 BP-HZN-21
15-061256 BPD1

M56 Depthand Brine/QilDistribution ftlaps

bp

$4+e ltsf

+i jt

Figure3: M56DepthStructure Map aikd.;Anetitu&,.fr/16p...,li'r

Rigelfield 'rr::ir ' i::i::

Ap-proximately to t.,ta,.Q,rniles the soulh:west of the Macondowell is a series of five channellevee complexes. These cfiannel sands range in depths from g100ft TVDSS to 14,000ft TVDSS. The Rigelfield produces biogenicgas.f.rom of the channelsystems(Figure5). one
..:::' .:.'.:.,i-1

(-11.;ffiO') gas The Rigrgf is a shallow field biogenic fieldin south-central Mississippi Canyon block#25?. lt is approximately age. Theoriginal Rigelexploration wasdrilled well by M.'??:in Texaco 1999to a TD of 13,60SrWD)112,832'(TVD). in Subsequently,production a wellwas drilled 20O3 Dominion (MD)l'14,162'(TVD). in by E&P.'This reached TD of 16,200' well a This wellis drilled fromblock 252directionally toward southwest. bottom-hole the The location in is Mississippi (TVD). Canyon#2S- Thiswellis completed a single in zonearound 1,000' 1 block As of the middle las!year,the well has produced of 72.5bcf gas. lt is exported the dry via Rigelpipeline. uqllJeCunently The operated ENl, by evidence Seismic shows thatthe lateral extent the closest thesechannel-levee of of systems (M110) doesnotreach Macondo (Figure the well 6).

Version 1

BP Corrfidential

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

BP-HZN-2 7eMD10033506 1 1
BPD15-061 1 257

M57 Depth ond Brine/Oil Distribution Ailaps

&

trp

EEf,

,,?

oil

ti r,

rlt
rf

t,

MapandAmpiftide ltli6 Figure4: M57Depth Structure

. .::: i i. .::

RigelWells
llc0zs_sslEP ti[0252:lsT2-cllE R

section showing Figure5; Sersmic

Version 1

BP Confidential

CONFIDENTIAL HIGHLY

107 79MD100335 BP-HZN-21

BPDI15-061258

lft110 Deptha1d Distribution ftteps ,BrinelQl

:'f-BrlneSand ,I,GOSand

#*t {t#r

bp

:i:t,
tr: I

:.:

::.:: :'

:'.:,r,: .::4..=

Version 1

BP Confidential

t7

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

BP-HZN-21 7eMD100335 108

1 BPD15-061 259

Shallow Hazards surveyacross Mississippi Canyon and seafloorgeohazards BP completedan archaeological for Block 252 and vicinity in January 2009 to meet MMS requirements archaeologically significantblocks. No significantman-made or natural hazards were identified near the drillingrig. proposed anchorradiusfor the Marianas MC 252-1wellor withinthe proposed The shallow hazards discussionis limitedto the top-holeor riserlesssection (i.e. between seafloorand the base of the 22-inchcasingsection). Figure7 showsthe top-holeformation that was derived from 3D seismicdata. Figure 8 forecast (THFF)for shallow geohazards log shows the shallow hazards tophole observations that was generatedafter drilling the top-hole section. The post-wellcomparisonbetweenactual drillingconditionsand pre-drill prediction providedbelow. is : Shallow Gas

ShaltowWater Flow anO 7,025 ft to ft A Low risk for SWF was assessedfor two intervals(O,5ZO to 6,7Oi:,itiMO SWF in the with a ModeJpt? of encottntering fek 7,614ft MD). There was one unit predic{ed intervalsare noted pre-drillTHFF between6,913 ft and 7,025 ft MD. Although$and-prone from the gamma log between 6,660 ft to 6,900 ft and 6,950 ft to 7i080 ft, no SWF was noted , section. the whiledrilling riserless ,,.:::., A slight flow was noted across tfp top of the weflheaCaOout50 hrs after reaching the total depth (TD) of the 22-inch casing section while tripping in hole with the 22-inch casing. lt is assumedthat the slightflow may have come from possiblesandsnotedabove. The flow was mud. stoppedby circulating
,:r :,::.:-..
't'':::i"'l

:'

::r':'

,:

_-a,i,,.

HVaratee|tli

't:'.-''.-

"rill

for d fne poGntiaffor gas hydrateswas predicte as Neqtiqibte-Low the entire riserlesssection. gas hydrates possible while drillingthe Therewas no visualevidenceor log Oatathat indicated ]: ' The potentialfor gumbo shale, a plasticclay return responseto water based mud, was not addressed the pre'drillTHFF. This was not a concembecausethe planwas to drillthe hole in ''Gumbo was observedtowardsthe end of drillingthe 22-inch casing sectionwith seawater. pad mud in placein preparation running of with circulating hole section. The gumbocoincided casing. Gumbo

section. riserless

Version 1

BP Confidential

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

0e 7eMD1003351 BP-HZN-z1
BPD115-06'1260

Depths 3D Seismic Line17?f2 dthe Prcpoeed Surf.Loc,

.68

IntrDretafm

Geohazards Comments Risk

fl

I Et 39
-6 gG GO

E 6
q

o o E o o

b o 6
e

e rn

a
J

E
f;
F
F

s o

NW

SE

s$
I
itq

S.ismbtaUgEphic lnt.rDrtillm and Pdnciple Utrcbgy

E o
d

E
! E I

'o

3
C o

E
o

] a o = o
sa//I@rbEhthtf s|@th dth .g',fet d-3' l5-2X) J &swtua

Seayatd

5,041 25

250 5,331 32 280 i,272 5,361

t.09,{ t.105

rfi 814 1,U2

5,807 4t 5,96 50 6,123 56

t268 t3t0

ffi
,
{r5l

Mudlne/Se.tl@r ,*m@4kcw.ffi, ,osslbb

lhh, dey &M. flM

N N \tfl

36" sg fo be jened into uFpq Unit 2

t
I
I

,n'tr'tdddMtAriiryt fr.llhi,ctabpf?'4a..:
dffit'Ewg :::,,ii:

N \|fl

Dtiltvl Sena,s I

ttEtrd*dmdEcLyltd possrtta rrarli

N N [/l
N

1,194 6,'t86 6,275 1.46!' 6J481 6,5m t,6m 6,612 6,70t 6,84 6,913 t,944 6,936 7,08

0.433

'28"
Sho I

c/'Utild/,6eddrb,/dslbB

N \ttl

2rl' csg ihcii"tii.be ser within upper Uoit 1 ',,talotett

70 0.534 71 0.578 s0 0.649 83 0.686

-(s)

7,36 7,614 101 0.876

I,ta 7,913 1't0 0370 2 , 9 1 97,911 8,0(X1 0"997 3,m2 8,19{ 3,367

iz'r: ts8+
,#
126 1.134

,.:'l' :.i: .:

4s ::'
09:m
.),r.

'a

a,nl q753 &8{2

:,,.

138 1.82 1'14 156 fu{:10 164 1500

ffi ffi
1361 {381 fi' -(4s)

t
N
sdc dbtrs/G

Ctrt rilM

srrphtttde teinrHtbs (possible 'shdiovCa6) are&out s@ftNWmd ?40 ftNE I Ddnvl Ssdu or 11.54- P&O nud ilneeded I I

Intafi..l.bttcby I Anntdib Jtd thin &y I prone d,|,att tt*3 vtd, . ,osfrtlarstts

N L

-22"
Shoc

hrtqffid d.ldr,to6

clry ttru.lrtss N.t

N N N

t ffi
crry er0Ei6 ed

Ji*Oc#d

N N N

22" nd t8" ca9 thoes ?o te set Marin urit 6.

a

S{t4t

itq9osra

.,3a
{.6'18 {,819 )r8lt

$ffi$

''fficltt6bl6N d.6dr forc

Ddnwl e.0- 10.6 ws soar

dopo.ft

$dt@.

,,s{ .ii:

., '!si''-i :

5,324
WM*nd-.-Fdh !m*

tt: ' ':...::,,, ::

18.!i t.6t8
bdd a.

Riskscale: I l**,ntl" L $roa'e" I*'* Abbreviations:BML= Bdow Mudline; SS = grbsea; BOF= Bdow Denick Floor; TWT= Two.Way T;avlTime I ptate Zg Air gap assumedto be E9fi ior the Marianas. Error: Estimated acuracy is I 0,5ry. seafloor, t 3.0%depthsBllL for (r..@iyi.z.@6)tu'-os*"*:;',nFff;l;S'

ffi

dabrlr tloG dfisrr6 sardt NrDb

rrd

N N

I
D3p.thLtnhor,he Sr''ilowHadg 4tge&tmctL

Figure 7: Oiginal Top-HoleFormationForccastat the ProposedMC-252#1 Location (produced Cnig A. Scherschel, June 2009). by A8

Version 1

BP Corrfidential

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

BP-HZN-21 79MD1003351 10
BPD1 5-061261 1

J|stg nP q4#F"
Pc - D.llA.s-m.nr Sub.r Prodl@d Wlrar Dryth

MC 252 #l (Macondo) LwD Log wlth Shallow Hazards Observatlons

IELL LOCATIOI|: Propoccd MC 252 Location mE* Milsisaipp C.nyon 2S2 ffiLL AFI:60417 41169 m DATE:5-1OO.iniF DoFth l.2O2,79BBFT fASTlflG: iOffihlXG: 10.431.619 79 FT DATUT: MD 19:7; sphroid: clark. 16N ([) PnOJfClOfl i UrMZunu lsG

- {r92'Ss

PGI - Ddi Obed.llon3 ilG.sEd Dpih {Alr6.p W.rer Ueplh = l,:fz' 55

- !!, ft,

:,
,lD

J::,

t5.

ruo nacdm

ot ntdd6 }qdd

6b3e.ad sst

rr:I il : : : - . : r. lr:l
. . 1 , .

EUs*re.

il ::.:.: . "-

t:l I

,to ru

'P.r.."ffi"

*".* :,+ :*
l.*

rc

: : r . jm

.\
+

:'ji m

::: , ao : t. ii:r:

. 'l *o i,: .1, : ": :':W

* .'': i,,,,
,,,:,* :tD, ,,4

i :rrul Iro 1r lzu: ltD1 l

iffi;m.*
Seafloor and the Base of the 22-inch Casing Hole Section (produced by Kate Paine, October 200e).

Version l"

BP Confidential

10

C HIGHLY ONFIDENTIAL

11 7eMD1003351 BP-HZN-21
BPDI 15-061262

Pore Pressureand FractureGradient The currentMacondopressure interpretation incorporates revisions the pre-drillforecast to basedon: synthesis LWDandwirelinepressure (pressure of indicators transforms based on parameters data(RxC,background resistivity, sonicand checkshot, density); and drilling and gases), (kicks, andconnection direct drilling indicators losses), GeoTap MDTpressure and and (Figure measurements 9). Porepressure higher is thanthe predrill mostlikelycurve,from pressure prediction too low in this interval to 9000'to 17750' WDKB. The pre-drill was due slower thanpredicted interval pressure velocities, the apparent and needfor higher transform model moresimilar that usedin the analysis thehighpressure, to of narrow margin offset well pressures muchlowerthan predicted.Pre-drill "Yumuri", MC382-1.Reservoir are centroid modeling channel of placedreservoir sandsdraped overthe large4-wayMacondo structure pressures ppg higher 0.1-0.3 thanshalepressure. pre$sures Actual reservoir implyregional hydraulic pressurerenvironments connectivity deeper to water,loweroverburdenlpore to the pressure lsabella), local south(similar reservoir to or conna$iVity updip'beneath saltbodies the southwest eastof the prospect.Though and wireline dedsity lirnitbd is to"lhe.reservoir section, calibratedacousticto densitytransforms the Macondii,Eonic cheskshotimplythat of and overburdenis lower than predicted. Lower densitiesuEOin the calitriated: postwell pore.pressure overburden consistent are with the higherthan predicted observed the at prospect. The nanowerthan predicted PPFGwindowaboVe:thereservoir level led to shallower planned than shoes, useof contingency and liners.
:: a::

.iii:

,',

iiii...,
,'-l]:r""1 ::::: l:,

Version l-

BP Corrficlential

11

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

BP-HZN-217 9MDL0033512 1
BPDI15-061 263

5117110 Forccast REV3, Pressurc MC_252-1A Macondo

flmm s'
a'

5_W
ilto

-\

-t!sEd

wr

tgaEa

1825

\ \

r. \u

lcr,v
ibRoil

z'

Hfl]

&rctDis

-\

t..,

1a' il/Po
&.rstDis Sub

s \"fi
\a.
ldf($a

ai
I

. IVIOiTUKELYO,ERzuFEN -PR- Ulost Likdy Shde Frac PR-llc6t Ljkdy Sard Frac -lrrlShde & Sad ftesswe o l{ck Presue_Rl[6 o GeoTap_RI13 o &ireSarb-.,(I17 r CcSands_RI18 o Ol Saxb_RT19 I NDI Fomdion Pressue_Rl22 r DillirBOonmats

130l{ch ll=10.t

1m.m f,S*' 9rc' o

r 16',

\ \ \

\\ \
zlrt
l(

P
s

lvl , 1s.7

.tr E 13sA'

1tr2

frnp"
\

m'et

1ry
l!0

tvta rro

s7t8"

1,{-"

ffiE
FID
iffip

u4 Rnilr1 4lGses

NF{

\ 89101112131415161718 Dorrnholei/t"ldwdghtEqdvabnt, PPG PPFG interprctation. Figurc 9: Post-well

Version l"

BP Confidential

o
13 79MD1003351 BP-HZN-21
BPDl 15-061264

CONFIDENTIAL HIGHLY

Petrophvsics Summary
that >90 feet of hydrocarbons From shows, log responseand fluid samplesit is interpreted in the M57 and M56 sands, the majorityoccuning in the M56D (22') and were discovered M56E (64.5') sands. Porosity averages 22o/o,Sw averages 10 - 17o/oand permeability log aveeges in the rangeof 250 - 500 mD (arithmetic, derived). Fluid samplequality is high - volatileoilwith GOR -3000 and API=35,PVT analysisshowed viscosity 0.17cp. of No hydrocarbon-watercontacts were penetrated and no signifigantaquifer sandstone was observed' :;:r;;: ' l'"''"'

analysis.

were calibratedto ii6ta fromrrotary Log derived porosityand permeability *ffe,wall core sample ,

M56Dis probablyslightlydifferentrock type and more n*,"*g"n"ous than M56i, this is by supported coreandlogdata. #,,,,, san*givesa reasonably M56E calibration log datato coreplug{da,in th,e of Thesuccessful parametefs despite relative the lackof core the high degreeof certainty around petrophysicat M56D data.A greater degreeof uncertainty existsin the morehete!'ggeneous sand.Further bearinS intervdls irlM56 and M57.Theywere uncertainty existsin the thin minorhydrocarbon tools as they are wkh standad'logging not coveredby core data and are difficultto resolve was by lessthan2.5feetin thickness. lq $,M56Fsancl no!fullycovered logs. The properties, preegu#Oata and *iOr,*a#nalysis capillary Electrical
when available.i, ii;,. the interpretation ' Data base ;:::rir:r;ir::r'

will be incorporated into

All LWD, Wreline, Mud loggingrPressuie,,ltrdCore data was loaded into Geolog where formation evaluation was completd. .:::

LWD

;,,,

(LWD)vendor. GR, Resistivity, Sonicand PWD Halliburton ivds;:thp Logging Unrite Oritting plus pressure targetsection. formation in toolswerein theiBtjAwhile.dritl*rg Geotap
...i:.,r,,,:..::,:,:,lj,

ln the wireline sectiitn,,LWD was depth shifted to TCOMBO Gamma Ray. ln cased hole wherewirelind,$onic casingwas run, LWD was shiftedto it to matchsonic response in section, on LWD and wireline.From mudlineto top of sonic in casing(-11,700'md) the depth shift was distributed. Wlrellne The followingSchlumbergeropen hole wireline logs were run in 6 descents in open hole sectionfrom 17,150'-18,270' They includethe following MD. tools: R1Dl : ZAIT-GPIT-LDS-CNL-GR-LEHQT R1D2:CMR-ECSHNGS-LEHQT Rl D3: DualOBMl-GPIT-DSI-GR-LEHOT (pressure RlDzt: MDT-GR-LEHQT and samples)

Version 1

BP Confidential

13

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

BP-HZN-2179MDL00335114
BPDl 15-061265

(rotaryside wall cores)was not fully successful; Rl D5: MSCT-GR-LEHQT repeated as R1D7afterRl DO R1D6: QuadVSI-GR-LEHQT Basic obseruation on |ogs and borehole condition: . The holehas a diameter 8.5"fromTD of 1827Q'to of 18,090'md 9.875" and from 18,090'md to the 9.875"casingdue to the use of a hole openerassembly. . This hole sectionwas drilledwith barite as a mud weightingmaterial(-20 o/o high gravity of weight solids).This causesthe densitycorrection curve (DRHO)to read negativeand also significantly affectsthe qualityof the PEF curve. . Run R1D1 was run -7 days after the formationwas drilled and 20 hours after the last circulation stopped. During that time the open hole was exposed to differentkinds LCM materials treat losses,belowthe 9.875' shoe and closeilp,TD:fie caliperindicates to some ','' wash outs in shalesbut mainlygauge hole in sandstone-i:r; r ., r;r,:;.

preparation There were44 rotary sidewallcoresamples recovered 3 MSCT from runs. Sample
and analyses were done at Weatherford's Laboratories.

Onlyaround 2/3rcls the samples of werein a condition suibhte petrophysical for analysis. After properties pore sufficient cleaning drying, samples and 6 werededicated mechanical for and (RCA). The compressibility studies. samples 19 for were selected Routine CoreAnalysis analyses from 17 samples from M56Dand M56Ehave benSrnpleteO date and are to referenced thisdocument in whilst moresample sfillbeing 2 arE RCA andfysed. wasperformed at 500 psi andat NetConfining Stres.q,,{NCS) of 20S psi.NCSwascalculated postwell from sandfracture evaluation, burden over estimation porepressure. and

pressure Currently and Special Core-anatyifi*lectricai:Ciaperties Capillary measurements) arebeenrunon a setof samples 16 out':Of:tfie samples 17 weredescribed fine to medium as sizegrainsandstones, as one
Shalg. ': .: ,...: I ,r,i'
" ,ir,. .r,. , ,,.t,tal

(6 LaserGainSizeAnalysis on ILSSA) results 17 samples in M56Dand 11 in M56E)are presented Figures and11. in 10

l;:i.:, '10 permeability air at NCSis plotted In Figure Klinkenbetti''conected to versus percentage the of different particles thesample. size in There a clear is relationship between and sandcontent permeability. ,.,i:ril

(green) It couldbe argued that the M56Dsamples havemarginally moresilt and lesssand grainsizeparticles (blue), than M56Esamples though with the relatively smalldataset this maybe a function the sampling. of

Version1

BP Confidential

1,1

r-t

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

15 79MD1003351 BP-HZN-21
1 266 BPD15-061

F$f*-l6S{' Ftl*h ttr6n,t a,",o*

c|jY.

SILT,SAltIB

cdo" f**ninuru d tn&rfl'l-lro

vs Figurc 10: LaserGnin Size Analysis,Permeabitity percenlage of differcnt (sand, sitt,ctay) size particles. permeabif#air at NCS is plottedu"ow percentageof different In Figure 11 Klinkenberg grain size and permeability. The data shows a clear relati6nship beh,veen size sand particles. slightlypoor sorting, In generalM56D(green)has a subtlywider rangeof.grainsize suggesting while the M56E(blue)is morehomogqneous.

a g

=
o I

? J 3 J
a o

I @

\ 5 J $ q

3 c

RSyC-I-CSA SArD-Vr-l Oolsc filxklm

hblrk. ('t66o lXt{t

(!)

nS'TICJCSASAI.IO-IL t (t) ColeD Morttrus sf NIEFr'r'[-No

hi@B ElrEO I|I9OE

sf t{TEfr\d|t1-fio

Figurc 11: Laser Gnin Size Analysis,Permeabilityvs. percentage of differcnt (very fine, fine, medium and coarse)size sad particles.

Versian 1

BP Confidential

1.5

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

BP-HZN-2179MDL00335116
1 BPD15-061 267

The observations Figures and 11 leadsto the suggestion from 10 thatthe M56Ecoreplugs indicate slightlybettersortingthan the M56Dplugs.This is reflected their respective in positioning l(PHl paceas indicated Figure in in 12. Further Wnlandiso-pore the throat lines suggest two sandsmaybe slightly that rocktypesbasedon theirdegree sorting. different of The10 micron divides tworockgpe. line the
MacondoPorosityvs Perncability

o E
o o

1m.om 10.000
1.0@

e
ll

a!

o o
E

o q cD o ll c o
T

0.100 0.010 0.001

Microns @0..1 @ 0.5 Microns @ 2 Microns RS @ 5 Microns -R35 @ 10 Microns -R$ @ 20 Microns -R35 @ 30 Microns O M56D . M56E

_R35 _R35 -R35

.E I

., 'rl.:]r

,trn,,,,r-.*nland

R35rocktypingplof.';,.'i

. r : . . .l r . .

X-Ray diffraction(XRD) analysls'iesunsfrom 10 samples(4 in M56D and 6 in M56E) are presentedin Figure 13. Mineralogical content of all analysed sandstonesamples are in Plagioclase. average93% Quartzwith Kaolinite(-2o/o) and lllite 170clays,'1%K-sparand 3 o/o Based on the 10 samples from M56D and M56E there appears to be no differencein properties likely is mineralogy betweenthe two sand bodies,so any variationin petrophysical to be a functionoigiCinff,iand most likely sorting.

Version L

BP Corrfiderrtial

1.6

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

17 7eMD1003351 BP-HZN-z1
BPDl 15-061268

.t:::,.,,:rrilr.

.,!,i::

Figurc 13: X-Ray Diffnction Analysis.First4 samples (from 3-4R to Z4R) are for M56D, 6 next samples are from M56E. .' Routine Core Analysis

weresubjected to and the werecleaned dried, 17samples sidewall coreplugs Afterthe rotary were of RoutineCore Analysis(RCA). The measurements poiosityand permeability andrepeai stair performed 500psiandat 2000pqf{HCS)- analysis included steps The also at of and measurements porosity permeability.
'i:i;:;1; .; r,r

permeabjlrty air at NG.isplotted 14. M56D at versui Porosity NCSin Figure to Klinkenberg are characteristics hardly than M56E and its reservoir sand may be mere heterogeneous for work. by described the available samples.Moreaoredatawill be necessary rocktyping -. in morethangrainsize. may function thiseffect From Lasilrgrainanalysissorting bb,:.b the

::::',

Version 1

BP Confidential

.l t7

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

18 7gMD1003351 BP-HZN-21
269 BPD115-061

ft51t6-RCAK*ltl!fr-l{es w. R$lt$6-RGAF?lfT*Fl6$ erossFbt ItsllI h{CG2S2-1JT0I -SF

ln,irrysls HI$tr ti5E Frllqn

Ci

(fl CJ

J. z
J: !s
:d
I

d E
u
E

s !..)

RSttf,-Rfi{,FFllt-}.lSS- I fE} Hqhilrlm st IFITER\IAI-NS CIefisn

htnr.cel* fl,llliO f l$c

Furctfons: rnocando-l*v$;oor*c[r6:

Rcuracsi+n LnEs R51rUfi*EfJr.Fl{fT*FlC5. : r*KilqH-t-ICS, CC. CI.967*7.5 RS|I$C*RCA K n 10+*(*S;?1966 + 0"JSE^I.19*{Ft'ilT}}

yersus Porosity NCSwith permeability air at NCS/s plotted Figure 14: RCA.kltitganrerg at to linear regressi n funclie;n'.sedfor Permea lity calculation. o {t bi Frequency histograms corederived of Porosity Permeability presented Figure and are in 15. Porosity M56Dsamples verycloseto M56Esamples Permeabilityslightly of are but is less,it packing maybedue to sorting, and to grainsizedistribution mineralogical as content the of sands similar. is

Version 1

BP Confiderrtial

1B

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

1e 7eMD1003351 BP-HZN-21
BPDl 15-061270

t$::

$:

mean:236 Geometic mP mean.363 Arlthmetic mP

Pomsity ge:20%-22%-23% ran

mean: 453SP Geomettic mean.493 ggB Arithmetic

ran Pomsity ge:21%-2?%-23%

s I *F $ E mean:355 Geometric SF 444 Arithmetic mean: gXQ

,::.]t'i,.: ,t:::,::.

ItFtFI

21 PorosiV range: %-22%-23%

Kinkenberg pemeabil$ to air at NCS and ol Figure 15: Frequencydistribution Core measured Porosity NCSseparafe/ypersands and both sands together. at Log to Core calibration equation: was derivedftEfqi|g densitylog from the following Porosity : Densityporosity(dec)=:(Rhog- Rhob)/ (Rhog- RhoD Where: Rhog is graindensity(g/cc) Rhob is the densitylog (g/cc) Rhof is the fluid density(g/cc)

from core deriveddata. GrainDensity(Rhog)and FluidDensity(Rhoflwere determined of Frequencydistributions core measuredRhog and log Density(Rhob)vs. core measured porosity (Phit-ncs)plot are presented Figure16. in

Version 1

BP Corrfidential

19

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

BP-HZN-217 9MDL00335120
15-061271 BPDI

Core derivedRhog from the M56D and M56E sands are very similar a|2.645 g/cc. However the cross-plot Core porosityv Densitylog (Rhob) shows the M56D sand plugs to plot off of trendwith the M56Eplugs. The force fit linethroughtrre M56Eplugsthroughthe graindensity of 2.645 g/cc givesa very reasonable FluiddensityRhof of 0.845g/cc,which is consistent with the reservoir fluid from pressuredata and the mud filtratedensity. A numberof M56D plugs suggesta higher Rhof of greaterthan 1 g/cc which is inconsistent with the reservoirfluids derivedform logs, pressuredata and fluid evaluation. Considering these data points to be g/cc is usedfor Densityporosityevaluation all sands. anomalous, RHOF=0.845 a for

n|'|mm !l fsf{c-*f^Si:S art tc*lttrr_Esr-&P ht(R* {dh. Hia fs{*,

Nllf;g,f,HoB 6 FSSI..RCAFiSr-I lLdlr kCoS?*l-3T0t-3P ht{N16 v'd6e. HSgl afiru

trrc{o,t

g
o I

u 5
qqr!+*,
l*'fu* lstfut nM*d lffi* hffi $1ffi lldhh ffib bdffi fl.frwh @ wzffi *ft!s

,.-.=:
l.s cilS 26 Lffi q91!4 t4m

nlff

gFFc}!-:rill& F f ? iW g f *Bob Old56O lfi$

frsfre-Jrfl,P-ritur6i-1 qdq f,.riEs

(el!l

! P+lEf;9^l-ilG

rEFn'do-rtlgc-rlJlEEc

Ai$safl Loe( R5{E-I!CAFM-|{C5. cr 'J,9$tit: ${$a * {a,{6 - r,F.lF|gr}}

tlFE,fttoB

..:a

Figurelq,.$en. Coregnin aensfllraistribitifutdnd Crossplot of Density ys. Core porosity tog

af NCS.
.:: l' : ''r:1.::i:'l'ii
l

r: ::rr::::r::

ii::t:

.t;

:..;:'l

porosity Figure17 is an overlay calcqlabd of density core plugporosity. Coreplugswere slightly shiftedto logs,theorigirualsamples location the leftsideof the Figure withdepth on 17 plugs therightside. shifted on porosity conect misplacement shale Thedepthshiftis,tb:;he,tler,.tnatch the Density and the of
i:'irji: r'1 ' sample at18,121',.

Version l"

BP Corrfidential

/l)

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

21 7eMD1003351 BP-HZN-z1
BPD115-06',t272

Figurc 17: Catibrptioniog:q-to 9orc. Cod..pgrosityat /VCSoverlays with Density log derived porosity. Origiial sidewallcore plug depths o-qtrith.e plot, depth shifted plugs on the ight. teft
,'i1 ji::' :,:,:'

'',,,...:a

Porosity fromdensity ioiiiin upperlobe(M56D) 2-6 porosity is unitslowerthancore calculated poqsitywhilein thelowerJobe (M56E) derived theymatch well.
:lt':,,:,;::;.,,,, ,_liii:ir"

.,,.1l,,riit

for is log for Oneof tne possittereasons thismismatch overconecting the density (RHOB) of (DRHO barite additivesto bythe red shading in mqd.The degree correction of log)is shown Figure 18. (Y 18a, between core On the left side in FigUiiS DRHO axis)is plotted versus difference the porosity density porosity axis). M56Esand(in blue)the difference +/- 1 (X and derived For is -0.015 porosity whiledensity g/cc;ForM56Dsand(in green) unit correction is DRHO around porosity thedensity conection the and difference higher most thesamples. are for of ThelargeDRHO corrections match spikes the PEFcurve in indicating greatest the barite effect (blue curve Neutron-Density in Figure in track) 18b.

Version 1

BP Confidential

21

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

BP-HZN-2 TeMD 1 1003351 22

BPD115-06't273

Domlv conrollon IDRHOI dlf|brgrce betweenGorE v3. porosllyard log poroslv.

Deffiity ctrrsction IDRHOI E. difr'Irca porosity and log poroslly.
ffiEPil,drCtd r* rg)r9-r_t0r_p ld-&RWlt.unlffn

b{affin

Cor

6K_@ rd.dr c&r Ifur truow

E_r._t

f!/S

d e1c4,B

oxL#tt

i.,:bd.*di$F.

lf Uppcr sdrd was iilectld 8hould bs --ll,0l5 gcc

by brltc

as Lo{ver sard DFHO

Figure 18aand Figure To eliminate over correction,:'DRFj'O the values.=-O::q!i+'#tr"replacedby -0.015and Rhob in uppersand M56Dlog was corrected and used for densityporosity calculation. ' (Phit-Upper)matchedCore porositymore After the correctionwis rnaCl, tne Densi$ p.prosity closelyand the extrapolated ftuid density matchedmuch closerto the fluid densityof 0.845 g/cc,estimated M56E. As the reservoir are in fluidsin both reservoirs very similarand the mud filtrateis the samethis is a reasori&le outcome(Figure19). . ::,',, ii";i

Version L

BP Confidential

22

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

123 7eMD100335 BP-HZN-21

BPD115-061274

porosity M56D Figure19: in withcore porcsityand cross ptots corrected of Orcdaying Density Density withcorc porosityfor FluFd log densi$ estination. The needto makethjs. conection to,,lie,the datasuggest slightly core a higher uncertainty in parameters the M56Dsard compared the M56Esand. petrophysical in to TheremayUeotherfactorsto takein to consideration as anisotropy to thinbeds. such due
r:r:lllr i

Per

tits-interuals

Volumeof'shile (Vsh)cut-offwgSeO to identifypermeable intervals. For Gamma Ray log waq,used fol Vsh estimation. VSH calculation GR_sandand GR_shale lineswere createdand Vsh was derivedas: ys6=16R-G R-sand)/(GR-shale-G R-sand) The sand and shale lines were adjustedto reflectthe sand percentages from the mudlogand by Quartzvolumeestimated of ECS log. For identifying possiblypermeable all layersa Volumeof shale (VSH)cut-offof 0.4 is used. The cumulative sand countfor each of the permeable sandsis presented Figure20. in

Version 1

BP Confidential

23

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

BP-HZN-217 9MDL00335124
BPD15-061275 1

17+56,07351 7381,07351 1 lvl578 17458,073{717383,07347 17689,07027 l76l+,07027 t457C 17697,570147622.57014 1

17793,06826 17718.06826 564 M 17795.56821 177?0.56821

2,0u000 8,5000u
2,50000 5.00000 2.00000 22,00000 69.50000 6.50000

17975.i00t}, 17964.56328 17889,56328 l''{568 't796915080 17978.56256 17903,562s6

r8030;00fi0, 8019.06017 1 17944,06017 t456C

18021.0600.+ 179,+6,06004

r8o6P,oqoo 18056,05774 l,l56D 17981,05774

18089,000$ 18078.05618 18003,05518
18109.05382 18034.0538? M56E

rqt91,fft0t] 18180,048+Z8105.04842 1 18131.54683 M56F 18217;5000 18205,54683 18?27,54573 8152.54573 1 rtE:Z-EE-.WSI

::,:: ::,',,, .,r,11_

persandunit:|:i Figure Cumulative 20: sandthickness ' PetrophyslaI para c meters lculfuns ca Determination n* sand cutoff ol

r j _, : . : t , r . , : : i

A frequency in of isiiresented Figure A netsandcutoff of 14 21. histogram Oensity,porosity 7oporositf and< 0.4Vshwasr,rsed, These values based GOManalog are on Middle Miocene wells, Thbre is not enoughggre:data to confirmthese parameters with permeability
distributions.
l''',-1,'..:",1,".. l,.1t4.'t'

The Densitfi.,pErosity compgd to Coreporosity M56Dand M56Esands, in whererotary was sidedwall derivedporosity slightgas was,used for calibration.In spite of an apparent porosity (usual signature Neutnon:Density and CMRporosity beinglowerthanDensity on log for gas sands), volatile therefore gas no fluidisamfling bothreservoir of sandsshowed oil, porosity beendemonstrated has correction applied tO:the Density Thedensity derived log. log to tie reasonably toiorosityfromcoreplugs. well

Version l-

BP Conficlential

4,1

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

25 17eMD1003351 BP-HZN-2
BPD15-061276 1

talrdd{ls l,6?8, ft$?*, r"{ff{ }.s&S,u5fiC" t }fS, r$6f. }r?tf r f':gi.l iltEqtitc*ffi9s5-Srl.ttr- FLlde*5,
trbr= WrFlr*L;-t

!{'ffipgtqm s{ tdFt.FH$*& l*E{B Htof.$l* r*$TE l*gP

"ffi$u

SndU* r*h f&tdr"o eg{1tt Itt*raia t{rtt .aI*f U*i++{F ftr6+* lft{$ &6sll,{l( lsrr6cl. '{grpaf,a Eh'rdo$ *trr6i'lg |f,c.rlFrit r.afi.i ltnft f,iilf,liyl

!!4

=*,c*i,Ff &JSrS s"ffiE

fl:

+rstY
{}{EsE - 1llt?li *Et*${

s.rlc{* s.ffitss

E*ffi
tuma*rc ti&E gF4

F*ffi
rsE

fi itJtm gttltt Stl;n;l

porosity Figure Density nistigAmwith 14% cutoff. 2f: to and in Densitypgtrflty distribution the M56E net sand was compared Core porosity presented'irt and values. maximum mostlikely Figure lt shows goodmatchin minimum, 22. a the The same histograms M56Ddid not show a good matchdue to underestimating for (Figure porosity thissafidiffhe q5g@cted density used thecalculation 23). is for in

',,,',i 1i1f,:

Version 1

BP Corrfidential

25

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

126 BP-HZN-2 179MD100335

sPD115-061277

tswon

sr*

r4l:tt_r_5r0r:F tli{ ldml

Fl4ft te luTffi*t-rt'

c*LR^rnr_iLl

effflr
o
E

o oaB o{a

sat

ss

ft
I
88?*
dd4c ffik. krAr.fu r'E.t ffiF ql*r ifrv} ta i ojlt7! g.lm

t: t

s$r n$l
off *ll

aa9f
dogd

*g8s
rddd
ffi

;k* Ela *
kffi||a tr

h*
Hffi Cf,|!|d. B.|W rd q6

sdryl
{Jtrg o.titldl

!o* ffi

o?tam

o.'f:il' trxsr

lstthaxlS+h l&r|{ r4r$ s,Egd q.s'* qa

rt 6,t?l|l. sl.$i csTrr

Blltll:

Elr'w ft.rrdM r 0E rdr t{t [fit!? 0ti6l 0t*}t

ffi***
HFIG

lF

&iSI
' ', :,i.i.l

1.,:. ,'.:i.r:'t::

Figure 22: DensityPorosity distibution in M56E sand vs, Core porosity:';;;:

ilrlag@ rt !

ta RgfC- Fcr\Pxn-trCs lr4De+?-l_tl0l_P il5{O *tr"ct rrt e eols trtth4-r4|

fql!$F !'f $niFrrt-o rQli rH.qt:-l-$I$l*Ff lrrlrnl tl5d0 fi!.[ |lOClil-lsQ*rLI4!*

6m6

{olor: Mt'l\uL-IO

t--.---.

i.

i fl
8d8 ded ed8 6 t s $ * d 6 d J
ffi-

8$3fSl
ddddddd gffF

mts

r#

ffi"d*S
org d't,s o2ffi
Cer.ak HF

rf Elr*

fii:H ff
ItF {trtrt!

ElGtlo

ldrc ft

",*
o.ralc Bm

Figure 23: Density Porosity (with unconecled density input) distibution in M56D sand ys. Core porosity. lf the corrected densityis used in the M56Dsand for porositycalculation comparison the with core data is closer(Figure24).

Version l-

BP Corrfidential

26

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

27 L0 BP-HZN-2 79MD 03351 1

278 BPDl15-061

Ffslogro m of Rs;lC- FCl,PHn-rCs wdh Eq25?_1_sr01_8P Hrcoh I56D filt.G Cdd ltrTEw,{-Ml

Hiiryom of uFf PHI-D-UPPtB u.[r uCO25!-l-Sr01-89

IriF6l M56O Filtcr: HoCtNt-SIIO-FLASEl

"8"

c0br: rM[tult_xc)

Et'

0,04 0,0t 0,0? 0.0i

00.

l
es!*s-hb"tu udic dG MfiFrdn bidr 6F B@ ||6Dffi lio Ccrnit

J
d
Inh*

0!l 0

JI
sdHk?

tl /l

ll

r{d
dur du! EU 0 D.l S56 O.lta 0-o05lo O.fiffi O.SSi l?lBrt

Ea
(i% g2m o-o3lEl 02,'6.

!*o hE!dr.!. 101 sl rcr 0 r9l0 otrm o29s

e#'.h Mdq Mtu Mtud R6t. u.F C.d'th !,F.5

E.-ffi tofi affi g triltlA, [21 N00 trzt5

Figurc 24: Density Porosity(with conected density tnput) distibutioniA M56Dsand ys. Core Three further sands have been identifiedin the TD hole'section; w.hich have a gas signature on Neutron-Density logs: namelyM57B,M56Abnd M56F. tto coreCamples were taken in the M57B and M56A sands though oneirs;ample was taken in M56F and is cunently under evaluation.

Fluid typing lhe sandsis ,ncertain of and parametiE,ii*'aifficult assess to accurately to due the thin natureof -thesesands,bdng below confidentlog resolution. this point of At porosity thesesands interpretation gasconection no applied the Density to in lr' WaterS-affu on fSw) "1
' N0 thick aquifer sand was observg$,,.fr intervalof evaluationto determineRwa. the An assumedregionalvalue of Rwof 0.021Ohmmat a bottomholeTemperature 243oFfrom of controldata was used for Sw evaluation. The parameters; a=1, m=1,81and n=1.88from the lsabellaanalogwellwere usedto calculate Sw using the Archire equatbn. The Sw evaluationwill be re-visitedafter Electricalpropertiesand Mercury InjectionCapillary Pressure measurements finished.Sw is a subjectto some uncertainty are cunently. Frequency histograms Sw are presented Figure25. The Sw cut off for pay is estimated of in at 50 %. The cut off valuewill be revisited afterSCAL resultsare available
,l rl,:r' :I':ll;i:

Version 1

BP Confidential

27

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

BP-HZN-217 eMDLo033 128 5

BPDl15-061279

Hf*l,s0fo.!'r lt}ff,$f s{ rfdt rlfo,rl3-t_grst_'sF

t!{cF,rr it }'._r'8. lrt"[, !cr|I{ u5iltt |ttoc. Flkr: 1lffiErl[-5tN0-FlJrdn rr:do. r 1 lrj!{. r,t!6f

fels.; tHf[flffl-$O

Foarihb volrg Ma4t6q vd!.t lfahwn wJn f*t!rn"f[ lctua Fnnte ffcos 0q{ftEtrlc Llrql l&rrrrcnls rrkfc

?{F o r,15SJ3 s?,1fitt* 6fl"006s4

1$.?!'l {! l}}J.llt 1t.Btgl*

r. 1 r. s, 6, ?, 8.

u57H r.584 usE HSAf l156a rrs{l lr56f

FaffilllE

$orloncr i7f.73.l$l slardsrC Eq+ricti*a 1 t3t:7$

5r.F+nFr

?.:sll?
. , , r : , : ! 1 . 1

Ittr FOfr 90fi

I . : , . ,

Figure25:Watersatuntion histognm Sw with Sw=50%o off. cut

'lrlrl:'i:r: t '''

Permeabil|igT':"

,r;,.,

(to Permeq.0ility air)wascalculated equation usingcorederived of:

':"r':' "'';:; "''t

'::

poro$ity v/v WherePH|T_E'ii*ilensity in Log derivedperme$ilityin the M56Enet sand was compared Core permeability to and presented Figure in 26irlt'shows in and reasonable match geometric arithmetic meanvalues. A similar histogram M56D notshowgoodmatch for did because Permeability calculated the was porosity (Figure using Density derived uncorrected with density 27).

Version 1

BP Corrfidential

28

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

12e 79MD100335 BP-HZN-21

BPDl I 5-061280

*!l*nd s :tr

ru<-Kftf$ ws-r-5tr-# lddw wrryr.n-s4' @b;rltilLQ

!@b$.rq rq

!L gl', r*

ffifi f#q,
h*lb. |!a45

l;Ud i;!@o
4t@ 4t'tE nlu

l**Ei3!
tG 4FS

*3#1

h\-rk tr*ntu wd dr. |fud. tut. dd'bi6 |s* b.

rfl { 5 .1?S ?.4.& /t@, 9( eg' Ul'm rs.E t

llu El1 !s 56r4trN s

ftl

'1'i@t

rttea Jt?.Et.

distibution in M56Esandvs. Cori funrcabil$. Figure26: LogderivedPermeabitity

l
itr*afi d rug{-ft*-ltt da ry&1-trD*t kt@ ea.' 4.-{r_*r*f-49 t*q46

ntsFd*t;-$l
h fff-!!'{r-P ild@

,.:1.,', ,::rlt,
i:.r'. :l

tusK,E&ae -a CjE@

r&k.

L_.. .! rf:

#ffi &{r
Niar!. tuKtd

,*m$ q&
nrr@ @5N rrt.J&

red!s-rF G tttt6 trr,fry *&?t

b*tfu b..

ffiH

,J:s';T hdb-16
fr87 E.@ lr?s. t

Llls

5 hdrirF @ffis

',6r.. re*u !t qFE

in Figurc 27;. tlo1 derived Penneabitityaisti.pla-tion M56D sand vs. Core Permeabitity. dens$ log input. due deived with unconected Underestinnted to Densityporosity for evaluation following Permeability and it evaluation, Aflerustrng corrected density p0rosity the matctr Coreis better, Figure see 28. to
, , 1 '. i
t',::l ; gsdffiL{t,16 s #$-i_tor,e HSq .xG il.q.ffi-s{r sb;84-s rysndKg-Sft-W Hr |@_r_trs_* tur.{sLgqr@-t o

E@iL *-e,i*

:hrE18-C}r@

l'.ir."s,
tud4k. l@+|5

;:s3
A&di !.1!@

:t*Lu-;*

:gbqL

L {h
?a*&

r.! n{

,;ia;ff

ffih,H:,;s*
Mb|b @sr Fgt {r*.t ilw

L
tc

ryo
rlr* ra.M ,t4trrE

Figurc 28: Logdeived Permeabitity distibution in M56Dsand vs. CorePermeability. Closerto

Core Perm distibution when Density porosity deived with conected density log input.

Version l"

BP Confidential

29

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

130 BP-HZN-21 79MD100335

15-061281 BPD1

Fluid Typing Based on MDT pre-testpressuredata analysisand fluid samplinganalysis,the M56D and M56E reservoirs comprisevolatileoil with GORs of around 3000 with an API gravityof 35. A morecomplete of data and analysis be presented FluidProperties set will in section. The M56F sand underlying main pay zone was not sampledby the MDT tool but basedon the it's locationbelowM56Dand M56Eand belowthe thermogenic front it is likelyto be oil. The fluid analysisof the M57D and M56A sands is uncertain(Figure29). Sand M56A has a sonic log signaturesimilarto M56D and M56E,which are oil bearingsands.Sonic porosig calculatedin the sand matcheddensityporosity,which also an evidenceto be oil sand as Sonicporosityis usuallyhigherthan densityporosityin gas sand. Basedon it is position the on boundary thermogenic of front- rightaboveit, it couldbe gas. The M57B sand is approximately feet thick ancllikelyto Oeaetpw log resohJtign accurate 2 for fluid determination, basedon its position but abovethe thermogenic front it is likelyto be gas.

Figure 29: Fluid typing of sands M57B and M56A. The M57CSandwas pressure toolat 17606'MD testedby the LWD realtime Geotappressure with an equivalentmud weight pressureof 14.19 ppg. This pre-testfailed to repeat on re-

Version 1

BP Confidential

JU

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

131 BP-HZN-21 79MD100335

BPDl 15-061282

toggingwith the MDT due to repeatedseal failure.The OBMI imagesuggeststhat the sand is are (Figure30) and the thin sand stringers belowdensitylog resolution very thinlyinterbedded of Sw so the evaluation porosity, and fluid type is compromised.

Figurc 30; Logs over sandM57C.

,, , a.:r,:r SandsM56Band M56Care thin waterbearingsands.

'at."

Reseruoir and fluid qualtty core data

r:,:, pressure data

. Soff iigrainsizeandsand'runtent the maincontrols reservoir quality. are on

. From Cere data, two rock types have been identified;M56E comprisesmainly Rock type 1 from Rock Type 2 by improvedsorting.The rock Types are also and is:d?fferentiated identifiable l(Phi space wlth an average pore throat radiusof 10 micronsdividingthe in Rock types. The M56D eand comprisesboth Rock type 1 and 2. Rock type 1 maybe sand package,RockType 2 in the M56D unit may wlth a mor.e lmmogeneous associated anisotropy from the be associated with some thin beddedpay as evidencedby increased There is a better match tensor resistivitydata and the CMR bin porosity distribution. in between core porosityand permeability the Rock Type 1 of the M56E sand then the more heterogeneoussands of M56D and therefore less uncertainty on reservoir parameters. to with the rest of the data when available Thin sectiondata will be integrated these assumptions. strengthen r Mobilities in from MDT pre tests confirmthe two sands have high permeability the 100'sof millidarcy range. . Figure31 showsthe permeability from differentdata. estimation measured core (to air), on Red symbols permeability from Densig porosityusingcore derivedequation(see Brownline- permeability calculated underestimation Permeability M56D). of in

.::;.:::

' t]].::ir: ,,

' :a..aa::

Version L

BP Conficlential

-)l

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

0 BP-HZN- eMDL0 335132 217

BPDl15-061283

Red line was used for averages instead- permeability with corrected Densityporosity input. Blue symbols drawdown mobilities from MDT pretests, Greensymbols drawdown mobility from MDTsamples. Drawdown mobility roughestimate permeability oil. is of to Pretestsmobilitydo not look valid to use, MDT samples mobilitymultipliedby 0.17 cp viscosity can be compared Permeability air measured core and calculated to to on with logs - magentastars. . There is a good match of log derived porosityK_COREand CMR derived KTIM (purple curve). . There was some initialditficultyin acquiringMDT Pressuredatg in -thetwo sands.Three fluid sampleswere eventually taken - '1 in M56D and 2 in M56e $ll3 samplesidentified same fluid - volatileoilwith GOR -3000 and API=35,FW analysisshowedviscosity=O.17 cp. After the sampling, pressure the tests program was resumed.
.i:.,:r 1:
4

;:.::a::l',

i iE
I i

E E

Shaded anisolropy, higherin M56D

f
I E :J o

5 4$ffi

CMR bin porcity, Ore8n larg8sl pores !illh filled freenuid Red Yellow, Blue derrE6ing poleslzed

Figure 31: Logsdata demonstnting M56D and M56E analysis. . Pressuregradientsare presentedin Figure32. Sampleand MDT points show very slight different gradientsbetween the two sands (0.249 psi/ft and 0.251 psifft for M56E and M56D respectively) but they were taken with different probes that may explain the difference. . Water saturation uncertaintywill be decreased as capillary pressure and electrical properties measurements available. are

Version 1

BP Corrfidential

32

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

BP-HZN-2179MDL00335133
BPDl 15-061284

180 180 18rl

...-i---''"i- "--1+*--.i---.-i-----i-'--.i--'--+--.---;..--.

181 181 i ; *\H-*: l"l i : i r i i -x'rw"*:lrooch 181 r'i8"1-: l _i i i i i i, i. i 1.,. I I ., .-:..-..-i...."i......i."lM56e .i - ....lli:i**l : 1 8 1 .. --i,. -;-.....r... .-i:i..,.;.useE -.-:If:**.: : = \ ' .. l- :.-, : r I I :l,i : : l "' :" " ' = i:" " ' y r' ' i " "i " i ' l iil 'ti . "i ' " ' J - -:' " r " " ' n " "i" i " " "i i ' - " "ii ' " " ' : i-' " "-"ii - '-' ' " " " 181 '"';
.."..1,,.,..:..,....

!
i

:
|

J,,,.,.-,!r-.,

:
:

I
|

-:,,r!

:qii
; l:,

r. ti..

:
:

r.,,-,.

s,...."!.,-.,.:.,.

i
;

:
:

:
i

ra!!.!,.:r,r.,

:
i

:
:

-t I & *,.:41..

I
i

l
i

181 181

itr)f tesb lf,ffen $al?rffrrS, -rrot va&'4dre to Nt{lgdpcabe prohdry.

,..,,.i.,...,.,1",,...1,,.-,.1.",..,1,...,t!.

",..i,.,r,..:,,",.,:.",,.'.i.'..",:,-'..3."",;"""'.:'-.".

"-'-_t-_"-"t"-'-

i-_-_-_l-.'---;''_'_-frf-'_i'---__'t-_"'"!

!'

fiEf ms srrccessf,rl
aftc'sflnp$ng

_'__'l-__-'a'____-i_-_'-'-r.'--__l'- -'

1 11910 11930 11790 11810 11830 t185tt11870 1890

psig Pressure, 10/div

lr 'i

prcssurc plot.
tal

Net/Pay summary

'..:

, . ': .

porosity, and table is presented Figure33. For M56D conected Density in Sw Summary Permeability usedfor avefaging. are

7 5 258 514 1441

Figure33:Macondo neUpay summary table.

Version l-

BP Confidential

a.t JJ

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

BP-HZN-217 9MDL00 134 3s5

BPD1 15-061285

PetroleumSvstemsand Fluid Properties Temperatures (pre- versus post-dri il)

macondoTernperaturps T.mperatur.r loF) 220 230 240

150 15500 16000 16500

160

170

180

190

2@

210

250

260

270

280

290

300

i| ,,,.,
$ tu*o

fl rrooo

i
Figure 34: Prc-versusPost-dritttempentue'camparison il: The reservoir temperatures were predicted be in bCtween to 219 and 248oF,with a most likely case at 235 oF.The post well temperatures, acquiredfrom the MDT tool gave a broad range between230 and 242 oF (Figurelitli.Therefore the.pqbt-drill temperature rangewas similar to pieJiction. the pre-drill temperature ' The black curve is the post-well temperature. curve. lt takes into accountthe outer limitof the MDTtemperatures the closestreservoir as reading. temperature

pre-drill Tne post-vell abovethe most-likely curve(-7 oF)but is temperature curveis slightly prediction. 7 oFtemperature close the pre-drill difference not to temperature The should impact the restof the subsurface work.
i,,:,,1i:iirlrt,r:r;;;

.,':,1t.,;:,'

:i: . ri

Version 1

BP Confidential

JrI

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

35 BP-HZN-21 79MD1003351
BPDI 15-061286

E Headspace lsotope (Reseruoirzone)

L o 'o ! 0 o o F

.9,

8,

Thebar$+rof well(below the 18250:lMD18150'TVDSS) morea biogenic has signature. is lt / giving believed the vertical that thermo$bnic doesnot passexactly the wellbore, front by the ideaof a lateral charge.Howevefi"'rf$js certainly vertical a thermogenic front. Thesection shalloiver 18000' (-17900'TVDSS) a strong than biogenic signature with MD has gas. Thesand somerareamomtof $ermogenic hydrocarbon. However, is mainly it biogenic at 17800' (17709'ryDSS) a goodexample: is mainly MD is it biogenic methane, has a but smallamount ethane of coming fromthe thermogenic charge.Thischarge was arldpropane lateralin nature.

,: ll: r: '

; :: r::,:l

Version 1

BP Corrfidential

35

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

BP-HZN-21 7eMD100335 136

BPDl 15-061287

Fluid properties
- sirnilar motecu{ar composition basedon WOGSls - no biodegradation - minimalto no SOBMcontamination
ft | 18086 md I | 8P039952|

I tr+z n ml

L ?t011111

Figure 36: Chromatognms1o, th" M)dead

derhrcdfrom the 3 fluid samples. oitsarnples

Three fluid sampleswhere taken at Sre levet of tnJ'iis;nioirzone: one sample in the M56D sand (upper san{,"lotreat 18086' MD"l 17999' TVDSS),and 2 samples in the M56E sand (middlesand lobe at 18124 and 18142: I 18037'and 18055'TVDSS). MD Three dead oil samples*"r" OJTUeO from tFirf$ 3 fluid samplesand were analysedfor whole gas chroffatography. The chromatograms shownin the Figure36. are By cofup#ng the three cnromatqdibms, can concludethat the 3 oil sampleshave a very we and a minimalcontamination similar molecularcomposition, that there is no biodegradation levelfrom the drillingmud. : we By lookingat tnelihgadspace isotubeconcentrations well as the isotopesignatures, inO as can also conclud!:,1hat M56D, M56E, and M56F sands are oil and have similar the composition. The M56f;.ilnd (18250'MD) is oil but has a highercontentof biogenicgas than the M56Dand M56Esands. MDT fluid sampleswere taken at three depths. These are the volumesthat were obtained duringsampling. Depth Sample 18086',MD 18124'MD 18142'MD

2% oallons
1 1 1

MPSR 4
4

SPMC
z z
tl

Version 1

BP Corrfidential

35

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

1 1 BP-HZN-2 7eMD10033537
BPDl15-061288

froma single flash The for assurance. results weretested offshore quality Thethreesamples below. aresummarized
Sample Depth 18086',MD 18124'MD 18142',MD Gas-Liquid

Contamination Ratio
1.2 ruto/o

(scf/stb)

Liquid API 34.9 34.7 35.0

Gas Gravity

Reservoir Temperature Pressure (F) (osi)

241.9

< 1 . 0w t % < 1 . 0w t %

3017 2909
2840

o.7823 11841.O4 0.8050 11850.41 o.7837 '11855.83

242.3 242.6

After sampleswere broughtback to shore,the MPSRswere restoredfor 5 days to reservoir pressureand temperature. iii
' 'l:'

are 37). composition three all zones thesame{Figure From flashliquid

d "" "t "Otftioo C dPd C .)u.i dPon? .ft "+ .e.f .9 .fn.f otr.lod oP ..,r.i:i.. componnt
compaison. Figure 37: Flashliquid"Aa:mposition Pencor conductedthe initial test of the fluid at 18142' MD. The saturationpressurewas pressure to determined be 6504 psi. The liquidvolumepercentincreasedbelowthe saturation system. From LFA recordsduring which makesit a dewpointsysteminsteadof a bubblepoint MDT samplingit was determined this was an oil system. Thereforewe had an MPSRsample to sent to a separatelab, Schlumberger Oilphase, confirmor deny the systemand saturation pressure. Oilphasehad a saturationpressureof 6348 psi and saw liquid volumedecrease below the saturationpressuremaking it a bubblepointsystem. A third lab, Westport,was selectedto confirm the bubblepointsystem. Their analysis determinedit is a bubblepoint system and the saturationpressure is 6438 psi. Below is a summary of the analyses by conducted the labsfor sampleat 18142'MD thus far on May 24,2O1O.

Version 1

BP Confidential

37

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

38 7eMD1003351 BP-HZN-z1
BPD115-061 289

Lab Psat (psia)

Pencor OilPhase Westport Comments

6504 0.587 0.168 2.564 89 6348 6438 18142'MDsamole

(gm/cc) Res Oil Density @ Cond

Co (10-/osi)@ Res Cond OilViscosiW ResCond @ FVF (rblstb) WAT fF)

0.590
12.2

18142'MD sample
18142'MDsample 18142'MDsample 18142'MDsamole DeadOil

,il:.
,:.l:., ,t,i . ,,.t :, , '::i:, ;l.,,

!':l

Version l-

BP Corrfidertial

3B

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

9MDL003313e 5 BP-HZN-217
BPDI 15-061290