Key Stage 2 Paddock Wood Primary School

Type D Kent
Pupil Estimates LA/School Number: 8862127 Y6 Year : 2010 / 2011
AC Core
Get Passes
AC
Pupils ---> Attainment ---> Estimates --->
NC SS EN+MA 2 Levels Estimated Grade Probability Level 4+ Probability Level 5+
Surname Forename DoB KS2
Y2 EN1 EN2 EN3 MA SC Points 4+ 5+ EN MA EN MA SC EN MA SC EN MA SC
ALFIERI Emma Victoria 05/01/00 117 3 3 2A 3 2 32.2 99% 77% 88% 82% 5C 5B 5B 99% 99% 99% 88% 85% 86%
ANGELO Joe 04/05/00 83 2 1 1 2C 1 23.7 29% 1% 92% 56% 3A 3A 4C 38% 61% 83% 1% 2% 7%
ANGHELIDES Theodore Bartholom 16/09/99 141 3 3 3 4 3 35.5 99% 94% 95% 98% 5B 6B 5A 99% 99% 99% 94% 99% 97%
ANNELY Serena 24/07/00 111 2 2A 2C 2A 2 29.1 92% 12% 97% 91% 4A 4A 5C 97% 96% 98% 43% 40% 69%
ASHE Rosie 28/04/00 115 3 3 2A 2A 2 30.7 98% 48% 83% 96% 5C 4A 5C 99% 98% 99% 84% 59% 78%
BAKER Liam Antony 12/05/00 84 2 2C 1 2C 1 24.7 46% 1% 97% 65% 3A 4C 4B 66% 71% 87% 1% 3% 11%
BAXTER Chloe Susan 13/11/99 100 2 2A 2B 2B 2 27.8 86% 9% 98% 87% 4A 4B 4A 97% 86% 96% 36% 12% 47%
BENNETT Grace Louise 12/10/99 81 2 2C 1 1 2 22.7 14% 1% 96% 81% 3A 3B 4C 58% 18% 79% 1% 1% 4%
BETTS Bryony Mary 09/12/99 106 2 2A 2B 2A 2 29.0 94% 18% 98% 93% 4A 4A 4A 98% 94% 98% 49% 33% 64%
BORLAND Ella 28/11/99 104 2 2B 2C 2A 2 28.1 89% 7% 95% 90% 4B 4B 4A 94% 92% 96% 21% 24% 49%
BRAIM Ashley 21/10/99 120 2 3 2A 3 3 32.2 99% 76% 83% 87% 5C 5B 5B 99% 99% 99% 81% 90% 90%
BURGESS Ella Jane 22/05/00 120 3 3 2A 3 2 32.5 99% 77% 88% 82% 5B 5B 5B 99% 99% 99% 90% 87% 87%
BURREN Jamie 17/08/00 117 2 2B 2C 3 2 30.5 96% 19% 95% 72% 4A 5B 5C 96% 99% 99% 29% 84% 80%
CATT Amy 09/06/00 105 2 2A 2B 2B 2 28.3 89% 9% 98% 87% 4A 4B 4A 98% 89% 97% 44% 17% 55%
CATT Elizabeth 09/06/00 117 3 3 2A 2A 2 30.8 98% 48% 83% 96% 5C 5C 5C 99% 98% 99% 85% 62% 79%
CHILTON Bethany 01/09/99 95 3 2A 2C 2C 2 26.2 71% 3% 95% 73% 4B 4C 4B 93% 71% 92% 15% 3% 25%
COCHRANE Annabelle Louise 05/12/99 98 2 2B 2B 2B 2 27.4 85% 6% 96% 84% 4B 4B 4A 95% 85% 95% 24% 11% 41%
COLE Ryan 06/05/00 98 2 1 2C 2B 2 26.1 69% 1% 98% 79% 4C 4B 4A 77% 86% 94% 2% 12% 30%
COLLINS Ciara 25/04/00 105 2 3 2B 2B 2 29.1 92% 18% 99% 90% 4A 4B 5C 99% 92% 98% 71% 24% 67%
COLLYER Leigh-Anne Jordana 03/10/99 104 2 2A 2A 2A 2 29.4 95% 27% 99% 94% 4A 4A 5C 99% 95% 98% 66% 37% 71%
COOPER Tia Leanne 14/11/99 117 2 2B 2B 3 3 30.6 97% 30% 98% 69% 4A 5C 5C 98% 99% 99% 56% 77% 83%
COURTNEY Leo Jonathan 01/09/99 117 3 3 3 2A 3 31.5 99% 69% 86% 98% 5C 5C 5B 99% 99% 99% 85% 77% 87%
DOREY Keiran 09/12/99 100 2 2A 2C 2B 2 27.5 87% 6% 94% 89% 4B 4B 4A 92% 90% 96% 14% 18% 45%
DUNN Esme Adele 06/05/00 109 2 2A 2B 2A 2 29.3 95% 18% 98% 93% 4A 4A 5C 98% 96% 98% 56% 40% 69%
ELLIOTT Katie Louise 10/01/00 101 2 2A 2B 2B 2 27.9 87% 9% 98% 87% 4A 4B 4A 97% 87% 96% 38% 13% 49%
FAIRWEATHER James 16/09/99 134 3 3 2A 3 3 32.2 99% 76% 83% 87% 5C 5B 5B 99% 99% 99% 81% 89% 89%

FISCHER FAMILY TRUST and KENT LA
Questions/feedback should be directed to your local FFT project contact
Database - v12.08; Report – v1; Latest Results Data - Final; Printed - 08/08/2008
The national mean NC SS was -->105
Type D estimates take into account prior attainment and school context. They are based upon the progress made, in 2005/06,
by pupils in schools which achieved a value-added score at the 25th percentile nationally. For threshold indicators, the
estimate is shown as a percentage. This means that the level / threshold would be achieved by:
• 9 out of 10 pupils with estimates of around 90%
• 5 out of 10 pupils with estimates of around 50%
• 1 out of 10 pupils with estimates of around 10%
 Key Stage 2 Paddock Wood Primary School
Type D Kent
Pupil Estimates LA/School Number: 8862127 Y6 Year : 2010 / 2011
AC Core
Get Passes
AC
Pupils ---> Attainment ---> Estimates --->
NC SS EN+MA 2 Levels Estimated Grade Probability Level 4+ Probability Level 5+
Surname Forename DoB KS2
Y2 EN1 EN2 EN3 MA SC Points 4+ 5+ EN MA EN MA SC EN MA SC EN MA SC
FIFE Gregory 14/09/99 103 2 2A 2B 2A 2 28.9 95% 17% 97% 95% 4A 4A 5C 96% 96% 98% 28% 43% 65%
FOGEL Anna 30/07/00 106 2 2A 2B 2B 2 28.3 90% 9% 98% 87% 4A 4B 4A 98% 90% 97% 45% 18% 56%
FRIEL Daniel James 09/02/00 99 2 2B 2C 2B 2 27.2 83% 3% 90% 86% 4B 4B 4A 89% 89% 95% 9% 17% 40%
FULLER Emily Joanne 22/07/00 103 2 2B 2B 2B 2 27.9 86% 6% 96% 84% 4A 4B 4A 96% 88% 96% 30% 15% 49%
GARRETT Paige 23/09/99 102 2 2B 2C 2A 2 27.9 89% 7% 95% 90% 4B 4B 4A 94% 91% 96% 20% 22% 47%
GATES Samantha Emily 17/07/00 111 2 2A 2B 2A 2 29.5 95% 18% 98% 93% 4A 4A 5C 98% 96% 98% 58% 43% 70%
GOLDING Stephanie 04/07/00 141 3 3 3 3 3 33.6 99% 86% 94% 86% 5B 5B 5B 99% 99% 99% 95% 92% 93%
GOODSELL Callum 05/05/00 81 1 1 1 1 1 21.8 8% 1% 88% 82% 3B 3B 3A 21% 19% 71% 1% 1% 2%
HARRIS Charlie 22/12/99 90 2 2C 1 2C 2 24.6 46% 1% 97% 65% 3A 4C 4B 64% 70% 89% 1% 3% 14%
HAY Jake Elliot 16/11/99 115 3 3 2A 3 2 32.1 99% 76% 83% 87% 5C 5B 5B 99% 99% 99% 81% 89% 87%
HORTON Lauren May 29/06/00 121 3 3 2A 3 2 32.5 99% 77% 88% 82% 5B 5B 5B 99% 99% 99% 90% 88% 88%
JEFFERY Britney Ann 20/10/99 96 2 2B 2C 2B 2 26.9 82% 4% 93% 81% 4B 4C 4A 92% 83% 94% 14% 8% 33%
JEFFERY Lauren Sarah 02/05/00 101 2 2B 2C 2B 2 27.3 82% 4% 93% 81% 4B 4B 4A 93% 86% 95% 18% 12% 39%
KAVANAGH Charlie 16/02/00 107 2 2A 2B 2A 2 29.2 95% 17% 97% 95% 4A 4A 5C 97% 97% 98% 33% 50% 70%
KIMBER Harley 13/07/00 111 2 2A 2C 2A 2 29.2 93% 11% 95% 94% 4B 4A 5C 96% 97% 98% 26% 55% 71%
LORING Bradley 19/04/00 91 2 1 1 2C 2 24.0 29% 1% 92% 56% 3A 3A 4B 41% 66% 87% 1% 2% 11%
MANKELOW Sophie Evamay 13/03/00 118 3 3 2A 3 2 32.3 99% 77% 88% 82% 5C 5B 5B 99% 99% 99% 89% 86% 87%
MARSH Reece 03/12/99 87 2 1 1 2C 2 23.7 29% 1% 92% 56% 3A 3A 4B 37% 59% 86% 1% 2% 9%
MENARY Sean 09/01/00 102 2 2C 2C 2A 2 27.9 86% 4% 88% 91% 4B 4A 4A 88% 95% 97% 8% 37% 53%
MITCHELL Luke Joshua 11/05/00 81 1 1 1 1 1 21.9 8% 1% 88% 82% 3B 3B 4C 22% 20% 74% 1% 1% 2%
MITCHELL Sam Oliver 11/05/00 95 1 2C 2C 2B 2 26.8 77% 2% 84% 84% 4C 4B 4A 86% 89% 95% 5% 16% 36%
MOON Chloe 01/09/99 69 W 1 W W W 16.3 1% 1% 47% 79% 2A 2C 3C 1% 1% 7% 1% 1% 1%
MURPHY Luke Keith 20/07/00 85 W 1 W 1 2 20.8 3% 1% 62% 72% 3C 3B 3A 6% 17% 67% 1% 1% 2%
NEWMAN Taig 28/02/00 102 2 1 1 2A 2 26.1 64% 1% 96% 84% 3A 4B 4B 64% 90% 93% 1% 20% 28%
NISSEN Gaia Jodie Brook 05/11/99 105 2 2A 2B 2A 2 29.0 94% 18% 98% 93% 4A 4A 4A 98% 94% 98% 48% 32% 64%
O'NEIL Olivia 04/06/00 122 3 3 3 2A 3 31.9 99% 71% 91% 97% 5B 5C 5B 99% 99% 99% 93% 75% 88%

FISCHER FAMILY TRUST and KENT LA
Questions/feedback should be directed to your local FFT project contact
Database - v12.08; Report – v1; Latest Results Data - Final; Printed - 08/08/2008
The national mean NC SS was -->105
Type D estimates take into account prior attainment and school context. They are based upon the progress made, in 2005/06,
by pupils in schools which achieved a value-added score at the 25th percentile nationally. For threshold indicators, the
estimate is shown as a percentage. This means that the level / threshold would be achieved by:
• 9 out of 10 pupils with estimates of around 90%
• 5 out of 10 pupils with estimates of around 50%
• 1 out of 10 pupils with estimates of around 10%
 Key Stage 2 Paddock Wood Primary School
Type D Kent
Pupil Estimates LA/School Number: 8862127 Y6 Year : 2010 / 2011
AC Core
Get Passes
AC
Pupils ---> Attainment ---> Estimates --->
NC SS EN+MA 2 Levels Estimated Grade Probability Level 4+ Probability Level 5+
Surname Forename DoB KS2
Y2 EN1 EN2 EN3 MA SC Points 4+ 5+ EN MA EN MA SC EN MA SC EN MA SC
RALPH Ben 04/08/00 112 2 2A 2B 2A 2 29.6 95% 17% 97% 95% 4A 4A 5C 97% 98% 99% 40% 60% 73%
SALSBURY Kathryn 10/11/99 86 2 1 1 2C 2 23.6 27% 1% 95% 42% 3A 3A 4C 52% 44% 83% 1% 1% 7%
SAMSON Louie Tom 22/01/00 79 1 1 1 1 1 21.6 8% 1% 88% 82% 3B 3B 3A 20% 17% 71% 1% 1% 2%
SANDFORD Ellie Rose 17/06/00 106 2 2C 2C 2A 2 28.1 85% 5% 92% 87% 4B 4A 4A 93% 93% 96% 17% 29% 50%
SARGENT Jessica 07/02/00 137 3 3 3 3 3 33.5 99% 86% 94% 86% 5B 5B 5B 99% 99% 99% 95% 91% 93%
SIMMS Connor 04/12/99 136 3 3 2A 3 3 32.6 99% 76% 83% 87% 5C 5B 5B 99% 99% 99% 83% 91% 92%
SMITH Gentie-Ann Phoebe 14/11/99 78 1 1 1 1 1 21.3 8% 1% 92% 75% 3B 3C 3A 28% 10% 60% 1% 1% 1%
SMITH George Joseph 24/11/99 104 2 2B 2B 2A 2 28.6 93% 11% 95% 94% 4B 4A 4A 94% 96% 98% 19% 41% 61%
SNELGROVE Felix James 27/07/00 114 2 3 2B 2A 2 30.4 97% 31% 99% 97% 4A 5C 5C 99% 99% 99% 67% 70% 78%
SPITTLE Jack Leonard 17/09/99 95 2 2B 2C 2B 2 26.8 83% 3% 90% 86% 4C 4B 4A 88% 87% 95% 7% 13% 35%
SPONG Isobel 24/04/00 109 2 2A 2B 2A 2 29.3 95% 18% 98% 93% 4A 4A 5C 98% 95% 98% 54% 38% 68%
SUTHERLAND Jared 13/01/00 137 3 3 2B 3 3 32.2 99% 65% 99% 84% 5C 5B 5B 99% 99% 99% 77% 90% 90%
THOMPSETT Kieran 03/03/00 108 2 2A 2C 2A 2 28.8 93% 11% 95% 94% 4B 4A 4A 95% 96% 98% 22% 47% 65%
THORNE-LARGE Daniel 15/02/00 115 2 3 2A 3 2 32.3 99% 76% 83% 87% 5C 5B 5B 99% 99% 99% 82% 90% 89%
TOMPSETT Aidan 05/12/99 82 2 1 1 1 2 21.9 8% 1% 88% 82% 3B 3B 4C 22% 21% 78% 1% 1% 3%
TOWNSON Jack Edward 15/11/99 109 3 2A 2A 2A 2 29.6 97% 26% 98% 96% 4A 4A 5C 98% 97% 99% 48% 55% 74%
TURNBULL Madison 24/06/00 105 2 2A 2A 2B 2 28.7 90% 15% 99% 89% 4A 4B 4A 99% 90% 97% 61% 20% 62%
TURPIN Benjamin Andrew 11/10/99 104 2 2A 2C 2A 2 28.5 93% 11% 95% 94% 4B 4A 4A 94% 95% 97% 19% 39% 60%
WALSH Olivia 20/12/99 91 2 2B 2B 2C 2 26.3 72% 3% 95% 73% 4B 4C 4B 93% 72% 93% 16% 3% 27%
WATSON George 24/03/00 117 3 2A 2A 3 2 31.6 99% 57% 99% 83% 4A 5B 5B 99% 99% 99% 70% 87% 86%
WATTS Megan Grace 20/04/00 121 3 3 2A 2A 3 30.9 98% 48% 83% 96% 5C 5C 5C 99% 98% 99% 85% 64% 82%
WEEDON Nikolaos Matthew 15/01/00 137 3 3 2A 3 3 32.4 99% 76% 83% 87% 5C 5B 5B 99% 99% 99% 83% 91% 90%
WINTON Eloise 17/05/00 109 2 2A 2A 2A 2 29.8 96% 27% 99% 94% 4A 4A 5C 99% 96% 99% 71% 45% 73%

OVERALL ESTIMATE 28.3 78% 26% 92% 85% 4B 4A 4A 84% 83% 93% 41% 40% 55%

FISCHER FAMILY TRUST and KENT LA
Questions/feedback should be directed to your local FFT project contact
Database - v12.08; Report – v1; Latest Results Data - Final; Printed - 08/08/2008
The national mean NC SS was -->105
Type D estimates take into account prior attainment and school context. They are based upon the progress made, in 2005/06,
by pupils in schools which achieved a value-added score at the 25th percentile nationally. For threshold indicators, the
estimate is shown as a percentage. This means that the level / threshold would be achieved by:
• 9 out of 10 pupils with estimates of around 90%
• 5 out of 10 pupils with estimates of around 50%
• 1 out of 10 pupils with estimates of around 10%