PUBLIC VERSION

UNITED

STATES INTERNATIONAL Washington, D.C.

TRADE

COMMISSION

Investigation No. 337-TA-753

INITIAL DETERMINATION ON VIOLATION OF SECTION 337 AND RECOMMENDED DETERMINATION ON REMEDY AND BOND Administrative Law Judge Theodore R. Essex

Appearances: For the Complainant Rumbas Inc..._

(March 2, 2012)

J. Michael Jakes, Esq.; Doris Johnson Hines, Esq.; Christine E. Lehman, Esq.; Naveen Modi, Esq.; Luke J. Mccammon, Esq.; James Sherwood, Esq.; Kathleen Daley, Esq. of Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP of Washington, D.C..
For the Res ondents Broadcom Cor . . MediaTekInc.; NVIDIA Cor . ; STMicroelectrom.cs N. V. ` STMicroelectrom.cs Inc. ; Cisco Systems Inc., Motorola Mobility, Inc... Oppo Digital, Inc.: and Audio Partnership Plc.:_

Charles K. Verhoeven, Esq., Sean Pak, Esq., and Gillian Thackray, Esq. of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP of San Francisco, California
Thomas D. Pease, Esq. of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP of New York, New York Paul F. Brinkman, Esq. of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP of Washington, D.C. Robert J. Becher, Esq. and William C. Price, Esq. of Quinn Emanuel Urqhart & Sullivan LLP of Los Angeles, California
For the Respondents Broadcom Corp. and Mediatek Inc. :_

Marcia H. Sundeen, Esq. and Aimee N. Soucie, Esq. of Kenyon & Kenyon LLP of Washington, DC
For Respondents LSI Corporation and Seagate Technology:_

Jonathan D. Link, Esq. of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP of Washington, DC

PUBLIC VERSION

David E. Sipiora, Esq. and Daniel S. Young, Esq. of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP of Denver, Colorado
For Respondents STMicroelectrom.cs N. V. ; STMicroelectrom.cs Inc._

Michael J. Bettinger, Esq., Steve Everett, Esq., Curt Holbreich, Esq., Elaine Chow, Esq. of K&L Gates LLP of San Francisco, California Michael J. Abernathy, Esq. and Sanjay Murthy, Esq. of K&L Gates LLP of Chicago, Illinois Eric Rusnak, Esq. of K&L Gates LLP of Washington, D.C. For Respondents ASUSTek Computer, Inc.: Asus Computer International Inc.; Biostar_ Microtech (U. S.A.) Corporation: Biostar Microtech International Corporation: EliteGroup_ Computer Systems Co. . Ltd : EVGA Corporation; Galaxy Microsvstems Ltd.,. GigaByte_ Technology Co.. Ltd: G.B.T.. Inc.,. Hewlett- Packard Company: Jaton Corporation: Jaton_ Technologv TPE: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd ; MSI Computer Corporation: Gracom_ Technologies LLC` Palit Microsystems Ltd . Pine Technology Holdings Ltd ` Sparkle Computer Co., Ltd : Zotac USA. Inc. . Zotac International (MCO), Ltd :_

Andrew R. Kopsidas, Esq. and Ruffin Cordell, Esq. of Fish & Richardson P.C. of Washington,
For Respondent Hitachi Global Storage Technologies Inc.:_ Alexander J. Hadjis, Esq. of Morrison & Foerster LLP of Washington, DC
For Respondent Garmin International Inc.:_

Louis S. Mastriani, Esq., Sarah E. Hamblin, Esq. and Daniel F. Smith, Esq. of Adduci, Mastriani & Schaumberg, L.L.P. of Washington, DC For the Commission Investigative Staff:_ Lynn I. Levine, Esq., Director; T. Spence Chubb, Esq., Supervising Attorney; Daniel L. Girwood, Esq., Investigative Attorney of the Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, of Washington, D.C.

11

PUBLIC VERSION

Pursuant to the Notice of Investigation, 76 Fed. Reg. 384 (2010), this is the Initial Determination of the in the matter of Certain Semiconductor Chips And Products Containing Same, United States International Trade Commission Investigation No. 337-TA-753. See 19 C.F.R. 210.42(a). It is held that no violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, has occurred in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain semiconductor chips and products containing same by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 11-13, 15, and 18 of U.S. Patent No. 6,470,405, claims 11-13 of U.S. Patent No. 6,591,353, claims 1-6, 11- 13, 20-22, and 24 of U.S. Patent No. 7,287,109, claims 1, 2, 4-6, 9-13, 24-28, 31-36, 39-44, 47 and 49-53 of U.S. Patent No. 7,602,857 and claims 1-3, 6, 8, 25, 26, 30, 39, 40 and 42 of U.S. Patent No. 7,715,494.

111