Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Researching Everyday Talk - An Article Review
Researching Everyday Talk - An Article Review
make sense of their world, display this understanding to others, and produce the
mutually shared social order in which they live (Wikipedia, 2008). But, functional
linguistics has laid a different approach to everyday talk. Here, talking is posited as a
everyday talk is perceived as characterising our social lives. In this article, the author
describes the ways and means to research and analyse everyday talk. Two different
an operator, and, a casual conversation between three close friends. From a critical
functional linguistic perspective, these two examples are explored to identify the
mood choices, speech function choices and exchange structure. The author also lists
ordinary vocabulary items and idiomatic expressions, short and elliptical grammatical
structures, more accessible and easier to process, functionally distinct, status distinct,
brevity, generic structure, and stability to the Field, Mode and Tenor. Through the
mood analysis subsequently, it shows that the Operator works hard in attaining the
1
Caller’s needs by producing more interrogatives of all types. In terms of speech
function choices, the Caller is considered as reasonably polite when she chooses
modulated declarative form. Exchange analysis then shows that the Operator initiates
all the exchanges except the ‘command’ exchange. On the other hand, the casual
conversation projects mere talk without any definite pragmatic function. Through the
analysed text, some features are defined: more informal and colloquial, multilogue,
more open interpersonal choices, longer in talking length, more dynamic and open-
ended structure, and shift in topic. The mood analysis has then discovered that,
although the three interactants are equals, they slightly differ in sociocultural
and talks more about others than about herself. From exchange analysis, the guest is
seen to initiate more exchanges by producing mainly full declarative clauses. Unlike
In later sections of this article, the author explains how spoken data could be
collected and how these data could be transcribed. Data is preferable to be collected in
a naturally occurred event. Having access to audio or video recordings, data can be
transcribing spoken data, researchers are advised to frequently listen to the talk to
avoid mis-analysis and ambiguities. Deciding on what to transcribe and how much
detail is also another vital issue. The author has listed down five key aspects to
(Eggins, 1999). Of how much detail is necessary, researchers have to decide whether
2
to construct a delicate transcription or otherwise. In case of delicacy, transcription
must be complemented by a key. Finally, the author concludes that, the talk we
engage in actually embodies the society, even though we deem chatting as nothing
important. Therefore, she suggests us to raise our awareness on the reciprocal use of
This article may appear like a brief account on how to research everyday talk.
this kind of research for the first time and intending to adopt the functional linguistics
perspectives. Researchers who are not in functional linguistics might find this as an
alternative approach, as how Eggins states in this article, “For functional linguists, the
approach to everyday talk is slightly different. ….. functional linguists can offer
critical explanations of how we both enact and confirm the social world”. An
interesting contribution of functional linguistics is that, through the mood system, the
author has systematically and thoroughly analysed the mood choices, speech function
choices, and exchange structure. As a result, audience can explicitly picture how
interactants carry out different social roles in different contexts. Going back to what
Eggins mentions in the casual conversation analysis about ‘general trends in mixed-
sex interaction’ where she identifies the sociocultural conditioning of men is different
of that of women. From our point of view, there is another aspect of gender that has
not been mentioned in this article. Broadly speaking, in the present information
culture, classification of gender should not be limited to inherent sexes only, but, also
observation, their interaction style and lexical choices are practically different from
the inherent sexes. Therefore, we feel that their inclusion is necessary and they are as
well users of language and thus have effect on the construction of society.
3
In conclusion, we can say that the sections in this research report are well
structured with comprehensible use of language. All data are systematically presented
and analyses are executed in detail. Furthermore, Eggins has demonstrated that
Thus, this article should be a reliable base and reference to those intend to engage in
4
References