Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JOM Special Issue CFP Service Triads 2012
JOM Special Issue CFP Service Triads 2012
Guest-editors: Finn Wynstra (Erasmus University), Martin Spring (Lancaster University), Tobias Schoenherr (Michigan State University) Background and Motivation
The rise in outsourcing and specialization among firms has led to an operations and supply landscape increasingly based on networks rather than large, vertically-integrated firms. Consequently, business-to-business (B2B) and businessto-government (B2G) services now account for the majority of services in developed economies. A large share of these B2B and B2G services becomes part of the buying organizations value proposition to its customers. In other words, they are purchased by one organization from another, but delivered to a third party (see the diagram). These services are being referred to as front-end services (Balakrishnan et al., 2008) or component services (Van der Valk et al., 2009). For example, if a software company outsources its helpdesk services to a third-party callcenter, the service interaction is between the customer and the call-center, not between the customer and the software company, even though the customer has a contractual relationship with the software company. Other instances include manufacturers of capital equipment using maintenance service providers to work directly with end-users, as well as many thirdparty logistics settings. Public transportation services are provided to citizens by service providers under specific government contracts (concessions). In these examples, the research focus is often on the buying organization as the active player, initiating the triad. Similar configurations exist when customers play an active role, using buying organizations (intermediaries), e.g. project management or market-making firms, to facilitate access to suppliers. The ensuing relationships between buying organization, service provider and the buying organizations customer can be viewed as a service triad, in which the buying organization contracts a provider to deliver services directly to the buyers customer (Li and Choi, 2009; Niranjan and Metri, 2008), or where the buying organization serves as an intermediary between customers and service providers. Importantly, such service triads entail a structure of interorganizational relationships that is fundamentally different to that encountered in the linear supply chains often studied in Operations and Supply Management (OSM). Service triads offer the opportunity to study phenomena that are relatively new to OSM and of widespread relevance. They have been studied using social network theory (Li and Choi, 2009), drawing attention to the dynamics of relationships between the three triad members as an outsourcing arrangement is established. However, recent discussions suggest there are opportunities to extend the study of triads using other theoretical approaches, from within OSM and from outside our discipline (Choi and Wu, 2009). For instance, transaction cost, resource-based view, management control and agency literatures have been applied extensively to dyadic relationships, but not to service triads.
Topic Areas
Researchers who are studying B2B services can most likely use a triad lens to view their theoretical or empirical work anew, and generate new insights. We are interested in submissions dealing with topics such as the following: 1. Service Risk Management Risks from external factors (e.g. disasters, terrorism) also exist in service triads, but what risks arise from outsourcing and intermediation, i.e. from the very structural and dynamic properties of the triad? 2. Service Capacity Management Often, services are outsourced to specialist contractors who may provide similar services to multiple buying firms. In such situations, how can the pooled service capacity be managed so that adequate service levels are provided? 3. Service Quality and Human Resource Management The activities of the third party provider have a direct effect on the service quality experienced by the end customer, and human resource management is critical in this. But in service triads, multiple lines of authority and various forms of separation and co-location present new challenges. How can operations managers of front-line services reconcile these?
4. New Service Development The emerging field of new service development (NSD) draws attention to the interactive nature of service innovation; interactive between supplier and customer in a dyad, that is. What happens to the locus and control of NSD when the day-to-day contact is between service provider and end-customer? 5. Services Intermediation on the Supply Side Service triads can exist on the supply side as well as on the customer side. Take for example the value-added services provided by customs brokers and trade advisory firms. While customers have been outsourcing these activities to third parties, another trend is the disintermediation of these activities again. How do customers manage this transition, and how do intermediaries reinvent themselves to continue to offer valuable services?
References
Balakrishnan, K., Mohan, U., Seshadri, S. 2008. Outsourcing of front-end business processes: quality, information, and customer contact. Journal of Operations Management 26 (2), 288-302. Choi, T.Y., Wu, Z. 2009. Taking the leap from dyads to triads: buyer-supplier relationships in supply networks. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 15 (4), 263-266. Li, M., Choi, T., 2009. Triads in services outsourcing: bridge, bridge decay and bridge transfer. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45 (3), pp. 27-39. Niranjan, T., Metri, B. 2008. Client-vendor-end user triad: a service quality model for IS/ITES outsourcing. Journal of Services Research, 8 (1), 123-138. Van der Valk, W., Wynstra, F., Axelsson, B. 2009. Effective buyer-supplier interaction patterns in ongoing service exchange. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 29 (8), 807-833.