Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case Syudy On Proton: Individual Assignment
Case Syudy On Proton: Individual Assignment
Page 1
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that is PRERNA SHREE Roll No. PTM 1101002 of MBA stream had completed her assignment on CASE STUDY ON PROTON on 14 DECEMBER 2011.
Page 2
ACKNOWLEDMENT
I am very Thankful to Miss. Nidhi Khurana to providing such opportunity to prepare such type of assignment which helped me to enhance my skills. I had a lot of difficulty during my assignment but she guided me continuously and also helped me out to solve them. I would like to thank to A.P.I.I.T SD INDIA for giving me an opportunity to work on this project. At last but not the least I would like to thank to everyone who helped me out to accomplish this project.
Page 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Sr. No.
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Acknowledgement Background Introduction Analysis ( Internal and External environment) Conclusion References Appendix
Title
Page No.
Page 4
BACKGROUND STUDY
Strategic products are generally obtained from one supplier where the short and long-term supply is not guaranteed and represents high value in the cost price of the end product. The strategy is to strive for a partnership-like relationship with the suppliers in order to obtain significant improvement in quality, cost, delivery, product development and innovation. Before the establishment of PROTON the component parts manufactured locally were few and catered basically for the replacement market. However, with the introduction of specific localization programs for the industry, in the mid of 1980s, by PROTON through its Suppliers Development Program (PVDP), more components were produced to cater to the domestic as well as export markets. Many suppliers were born, and later developed and grew solely as a result of this PVDP. There were only 17 suppliers supplying 52 parts when PROTON commenced operations in 1985, most of which were low-tech traditional local parts like batteries, tires, and the like. To date there are 182 suppliers supplying more than 4, 000 parts to PROTON (Interview with the President PROTON Suppliers Association, 2006). In 1986, PROTON established the Procurement and Suppliers Development Division (PVD) whereby the objective is to develop its own group of suppliers in order to formulate and implement the local content program for the national car. It was envisaged that with the implementation of this local content program the automotive parts industry would expand. This expansion was much needed not only by PROTON in its end favors to build a strong industrial base to depend on, but also by the Government as a source of employment absorption and reduction of imports.
OBJECTIVE OF STUDY
To evaluate whether the protons new strategic plan can boost its competitiveness.
Page 5
INTRODUCTION
PROTON
INCORPORATED TYPE HEADQUARTER MANAGING DIRECTOR REVENUE SUBSIDIARIES PROTON MAIN PLANT CAPACITY
7 MAY 1983 PUBLIC SECTOR SUBANGJAYA AND SHAH ALAM MR.SYED ZAINAL ABIDIN RM8.23 BILLION MYR LOTUS MALASIYAS FIRST CAR SAHA ALAM 80000 UNITS PER YEAR
VISION STATEMENT
Proton has their vision to have a very strong presence in the domestic market. As ja car Manufacturer in a national economy you must dominate that economy.
MISSION STATEMENT
Driving Malaysias transformation into a leader in technology and quality. Proton are a passionate group of people working together, creating exhilarating products and services for global markets, synonymous with great styling, innovation and leading technology.
Page 6
public image because of their designs.14,706 Proton cars were exported in 2006 to other countries. Proton cars have also been exporting a small volume of cars to other countries like: Singapore, Brunei, Indonesia, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Taiwan, Cyprus and Mauritius.
LIST OF PRODUCTS
PROTON SAGA (1985 - 2011):- Among all products proton, The Saga is the longest surviving model, soldiering on for nearly 22 years. The Saga continued to receive minor updated until 2008, when a second generation Saga was introduced as a sub-compact model instead.
PROTON INSPIRA- (2010-2011) PROTON WIRA - (1983 - 2006) PROTON SATRIA GTI - (1994 2007) PROTON PERDANA - (1995 - 1998) PROTON TIARA - (1996 - 2007) PROTON JUARA - (2001 - 2003)
Page 7
Proton is facing pressures by Asean Free Trade Agreement (AFTA) and World Trade Organization (WTO) in which Malaysia is a member of these two organizations on the issues of lowering or removing tariffs and other non-trade barriers. Proton is unable to match the quality of foreign competitors - something the exposed with the lowering of import barriers. Proton cars are facing competition arising from import tariffs. Proton is unable to compete without the shield of tariffs due to its low technology. Proton is unable to improve its entire networks ability to operate in a more productive to reduce wastage or unnecessary cost. It has lost its Chinese joint venture as of in 2006 it has four joint venture with Chinese partners. By 2002 Proton had a market share of over 60% in Malaysia, which was reduced to barely 30% by 2005 and is expected to reduce further in 2011 when AFTA mandates reduce import tariffs to a maximum of 5%. Proton is unable to communicate with its consumer about their expectations from car. Company is lacking in their R&D, quality, innovation and also product differentiation in comparison to other competitors.
Page 8
SUCCESS CRITERIA
HIGH
LOW
JUSTIFICATION
MARKET SHARE COST STRUCTURE PRODUCTQUALITY FINANCE DISTRIBUTION TECHNOLOGY OWN BRAND
FALL DOWN TO 80% GOES UP TO 30% 77% LESS THAN OTHERS 60% MORE THAN OTHERS 20% MORE SUPPLIERS
OVERALL EVALUATION
COMPETITION
The existence within a market for some good or service of a sufficient number of buyers and sellers such that no single market participant has enough influence to determine the going price of the good or service. (E, Robert. 2009) (On the basis of porters five forces framework i.e. entry of competitors, threat of substitutes, bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of buyers and rivalry)(Appendix-4) ASIA PACIFIC INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TCHNOLOGY Page 9
90,000 80,000 70,000 60,000 Jan June 2009 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 Jan June 2010 Jan June 2009 Jan June 2010 Vehicles Sales Unit Market Share
Page 10
PEST ANALYSIS: - A PEST analysis is one of them that is merely a framework that
categorizes environmental influences as political, economic, social and technological forces. Sometimes two additional factors, environmental and legal, will be added to make a PESTEL analysis, but these themes can easily be subsumed in the others. The analysis examines the impact of each of these factors (and their interplay with each other) on the business. The results can then be used to take advantage of opportunities and to make contingency plans for threats when preparing business and strategic plans (R, Duand. 2009)
Page 12
vehicles because of the employment market uncertainty because of the global and local financial crisis. Another factor to consider is the growing knowledge and concern of the people regarding different environmental issues. Furthermore, the impact of the image to the loyalty of the customer is also another factor. TECHNOLOGICAL Technology is considered as one of the most important factor in the automotive industry. Due to the increasing competition, the development in technology is growing and affecting the performance and position of each and every company in the automobile industry. It is also important to consider the maturity of technology, together with the maturity and capacity of manufacturing, which affect the innovation process of any company. The intellectual property is also important factor, because it is considered as a sign of authenticity and uniqueness. Due to the different technologies, primarily the help of computer and the Internet, the potential for innovation and development is increasing
Page 13
OPPURTUNITIES Available government support Economic of scale Available technological innovations New product development to improve the capability of the existing models Strategic alliances Improve customer service Brand image, and Building worldclass vendor
THREATS Slow growth Economic crises Change in the consumer lifestyle Changing technology New competitors entering the market Threat of substitute product Threat of trade disputes
Page 14
WEAKNESS
Limited product line Quality constraint Less human resource Lack in R&D
CORE COMPENTENCIES
CORE COMPENTENCIES refers to strengths or strategic advantages of a business. Core competencies are the combination of pooled knowledge and technical capacities that allow a business to be competitive in the marketplace. (Johnson, at el, 2008)
Page 15
BUILDING SENARIO
Page 16
Expertise
PROTON expertise is focused around three axes: An industry/sector view, a geographic view, and a functional view.
2. Geographic Expertise
Proton Advisors has worked with clients to deliver solutions around the world, with particularly strong experience in the major financial markets.
3. Functional Expertise
Proton Advisors has working experience in the following functional areas: Business Strategy
Page 17
bring to the marketplace, and deploys your assets optimally to exploit those strengths. We can help you develop and refine your strategy.
Operational Execution It doesnt matter how brilliant your strategy is unless it is effectively executed. Your goals and objectives must flow from that strategy, and be supported by the right measurements, reward systems, and business processes. We can help you implement your strategy and troubleshoot your current operations.
Marketing Strategy and Product Development A core element of any strategy is an understanding of what the market will pay for, and an ability to deliver products that customers will value. We can help you implement an
effective, market driven product development methodology, and develop an effective go-tomarket approach.
Information Technology and Business Process Underlying the success of any business strategy today is a set of information systems that are driven by and aligned with your business goals. You must have effective systems to manage your order-to-cash cycle, your customer service interactions, and to provide you with the information you need to support timely and quality decision making. We can assess your information technology systems, business processes, and organization, and recommend how to improve them so that they effectively support your business goals. PROTON was focusing on the above area before 2006(PERODUA entered in market) but now the scenario has been changed because it is not working up to the benchmark. So, at this point of time we can find that proton does not have any core competencies.
BUT, in order to get a sustainable competitive advantage, proton should go for: (On the basis of Competitive advantage Appendix-5) Vehicle Development
Vehicle Development includes strategic alliance, value added partnership with Lotus, MV Agusta and Mitsubishi. ASIA PACIFIC INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TCHNOLOGY Page 18
Flexible Production
Attained through optimizing the resources Standardized Work- Implemented by JIT and Pull system Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) Monitoring-That includes availability, performance and quality of PROTON cars throughout at optimum level. Proton is also working on LEAN MANUFACTURING Lean Manufacturing is the process of improvement and waste elimination undertaken by PROTON by avoiding unnecessary processes in car manufacturing and unnecessary stock.
Fuel efficiency
Proton knows the price of fuel isnt getting any cheaper. The Proton Savvy uses just 5.7 liters per 100km combined city and highway driving (as per ADR81/01)
Customer service
All new Protons come with a competitive warranty to give you added confidence. All Proton vehicles are backed by a comprehensive 3 year warranty. Plus you will also receive free roadside assistance in the case of a breakdown. Proton also guarantees your car against corrosion. Each Proton vehicle comes with a minimum 5 year comprehensive corrosion warranty for peace of mind against corrosion. Proton vehicles undergo a Pre Delivery Inspection by its Proton Dealer in accordance to the recommended inspection schedule set by Proton Cars.
Page 19
Page 20
1. Commendable experience of 20 years. 2. Government support. 3. Experience of exporting cars. 4. Availability of funds
1.Over reliant on the government 2.Lack of successful operation internationally 3.Limited product line 4.Quality constraint 5.Less human resource
EXTERNAL OPPURTUNITY
SO
WO
1. Worldwide demand of product 2. Collaboration with Asian companies may boost up the sales. 3. Proton is evaluating a plan to built a manufacturing plant is Egypt. 4. Economic of scale
1. They can enter in new global market because it has good experience. (INTERNATIONAL level strategy) 2. It has government support, so they can provide quality service at best price. (BUSINESS level strategy) 3. Company can go for joint venture or collaboration. (INTERNATIONAL level strategy)
operation. strategy)
(international
2. The manufacturing plant in Egypt may increase its product line. ( International level strategy)
EXTERNAL THREAT 1. Slow growth 2.Economic slow down 3.Change in the consumer lifestyle 4.Changing technology 5.New competitors entering the
ST 1. Try to manufacture fuel efficient car to increase sales. ((operational level strategy) 2. By their well qualified and technical R&D department they can attract more customers and can lead in terms of quality, cost and innovation amongst their level
WT 1. Reduce the price of cars as much so it can be affordable for every customer. (Business level strategy) 2. Always try to increase the sales as it has good experience in export. (Business level strategy)
competitors.(operational
Page 21
2. MAINTAINING COST LEADERSHIP It needs to have a cost cutting strategy so that it can invest in global market as it can also manage low cost of its car
3. ATTRACT CUSTOMERS It can also have some expert people to build some international strategy to know the customs and attract the customer segment of the countries in which it is going to expand its market.
4. UNIQUE DESIGN In order to sustain in the current scenario of market, Proton must move towards unique design. It will give an advantage to compete with its domestic as well as global competitors.
5. HYBRID CAR Proton should go for hybrid as it will lead to low cost with a product differentiation in terms of product development as presently their products are not going well and with the help of well experienced and trained employees they can generate economies of scale by examining customer needs.
Page 22
CURRENT STRATEGY
1. Vehicle Platform
This department is responsible for vehicle development programmers covering: Product Strategic Planning. Styling. Supplier Development Programmer. Natural Gas Vehicles (NGV) Hybrid car
Page 23
2. Prototype Centre
Its leading-edge facilities and high precision tools allow error-free
prototypes to be built with extremely short lead times. The prototype centre is made up of the following: Clay Modeling 3D scale models allow designers and engineers to conduct feasibility studies on preliminary designs. Rapid Prototyping Extremely fast production of prototype samples is possible during the development timing. Prototype Shop .Full functioning prototypes are developed, as per vehicle design specifications. This enables testing to be carried out. ASIA PACIFIC INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TCHNOLOGY Page 24
Page 25
RECOMMENDED STRATEGY
After doing this study I found that among Protons strategies, It should go for following strategy: (1) Attaining cost leadership and differentiation strategies by improving the R&D sector and accelerating investment in product development. (2) Exploring new niche market and strategic alliance in order to expand the distribution channels. (3) Providing new brand images to accelerate public confidence and brand loyalty in the domestic and international market (4) Diversifying parts component sources and selecting reputable suppliers would help in achieving cost reduction effort of the company. (5) Creating strategic alliance to improve technical Capability as well as to penetrating new market and acquiring faster transfer of technology and technical-know-how. (6) It should go for more customers responsiveness. (7) To rationalizing its operations particularly in technological internalization efforts and on continuous improvement programs in Malaysia and Thailand it should increase its competitiveness. (8) They should look at the possibility penetrating of direct exports to other assemblers outside and within ASEAN, such as Japan (possibly through strategic alliance with Katayama), and the growing markets such as in India and Turkey. (9)According to BCG Analysis Proton falls under Question mark in a result of which it can go for investing in new opportunities like Joint Venture. To be in capable of adapting the Lean Manufacturing it should go with Toyota.
Page 26
CONCLUSION
This research conducted focused on the current and future strategy of proton with the objective of obtaining better understanding of the current practices in the Current market scenario of the Malaysian automotive industry.
Page 27
TIME FRAME
This will help proton to identify the area of improvement
ACCORDING TO THE ANALYSIS OF TIME FRAME OF PROTON, JUST AFTER 3 -4 YEARS, COMPANY WILL BE ABLE TO BOOST ITS COMPETITIVENESS ACROSS THE WORLD.
Page 28
Page 29
LEVELS OF STRATEGY
Now, we can conclude that PROTON has indeed working very hard for total quality management, customer responsiveness, product development and strategic collaboration. Due to the hyper competition in market it will be important to focus on the Best Product positioning. To have this they must have a good R&D at their inbound logistic. In order to get sustainability in market they must focus on low cost or differentiation of the products. In order to maintain the process of engineering and designing passenger cars which will suit the taste and preferences of the customers this is affected by different demographics, economics and social factors. Apart from this, managing key risks and identifying emerging risks especially in export markets will also play an important role for being a major international player. Thus, Company should go for right product, at right place, at right price and right time.
Page 30
REFRENCES
BOOKS
C,Sunil,M,Peter,and D,Kalara,2010,Supply chain management, 4th Edition,South Asia,Dorling Kindersley. Kotler, P. and Keller, K.L, 2009, Marketing Management, South Asia, New Jersey, (pp 53, 77-84) A. Pierre, et al 2007, International supply chain management, Canada, Nelson. D, Garry and W, Margareta, .2007, The management of technology and innovation, 1st Edition, Canada, Nelson. G,Vipin,G,Kamal,R.srinivasan.,2009,Business management,India,PHI Pvt Ltd. H, Jones, 2009, Essentials of management, Canada, Nelson. policy ad strategic
Page 31
JOURNALS Garth, S, at el, 2008, Strategic Management, Delhi: John Wiley and Sons Inc. Hax, A. and Wilde II, D, 2003, The Delta Model- A New Framework of Strategy. Journal of Strategic Management Education ,vol. 1, no. 1. Available fromhttp://pesona.mmu.edu.my/~wruslan/MISP2/Readings/detail/Reading-37.pdf. Kuemmerle, W., 2001, Home base and knowledge management in international ventures. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 17, 99122; Lorenzoni, G., &Lipparini, A. 1999. Prahalad, C. K., and Hamel, G, 1990, Thecore competence of the organization, Harvard Business Review, 90, 7993. ARTICLE 2003, LG CNS Automotive Consulting Service 2010, Market Watch 2010,The Malaysian Automotive and Supplier Industry, p34- 46. Abidin A.S.Z., 2011, Exploratory Study: Design Capabilities Development for Malaysian Vendors in Automotive Industry,Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, p45-46. Abidin, A., 2011, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, Assessing Proton and Vendors Design Capabilities towards Internationalization, 1 (2), p5-6. Arshad, S., 1996, The history of the Malaysian automotive industry, p67-69. Mokhtar, M., 2010, Proton Annual Report.
Page 32
WEBSITE
Strategic Management, Available from:http://www.emeraldinsight.com/products/journals/journals.htm?id=jsma,[Access ed- 11thOct, 2011] Business Strategy, Available from: http://tutor2u.net/business/strategy/ansoff_matrix.htm[Accessed- 25th Oct, 2011] Proton, Available from: www.proton.com, [Accessed-17th Oct, 2011] Proton, Available from: www.proton-edar.com.my, [Accessed- 23th Oct, 2011] Investopedia, Available from:http://www.investopedia.com/terms/v/valuechain.asp#axzz1daBEIoBh, [Accessed- 01stNov, 2011] Businessdictonary, Available from: http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/capability.html, [Accessed- 07th Nov, 2011]. Proton, Available from: http://www.hoovers.com/proton-holdings/--ID103957-/freeuk-co-factsheet.xhtml, [Accessed-26nd Oct, 2011]. Investopidia, Available from: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/1/80-20rule.asp#ixzz1deOo97Pb, [Accessed- 11th Nov, 2011]. Trading Economics, Available from: http://www.tradingeconomics.com/malaysia/inflation-cpi, [Accessed- 12th Nov, 2011]
Page 33
APPENDIX
Appendix-1 PEST ANALYSIS
Factors Could include
Political
e.g. International trade, the euro, taxation policy, government trade regulations e.g. Interest rates, exchange rates, national income, inflation, unemployment, stock market,
Economical
Environmental
e.g. Global warming, environmental issues, waste disposal, energy consumption e.g. Competition law, health and safety, employment law, product safety
Legal
Page 34
APPENDIX-2
V a l u e c h a i n a n a l y s i : Value Chain Analysis describes the activities that take place in a business and relates them to an analysis of the competitive strength of the business. Influential work by Michael Porter suggested that the activities of a business could be grouped under two headings: (1) Primary Activities - those that are directly concerned with creating and delivering a product (e.g. component assembly); and (2) Support Activities, which whilst they are not directly involved in production, may increase effectiveness or efficiency (e.g. human resource management). It is rare for a business to undertake all primary and support activities. Value Chain Analysis is one way of identifying which activities are best undertaken by a business and which are best provided by others ("out sourced"). Linking Value Chain Analysis to Competitive Advantage What activities a business undertakes is directly linked to achieving competitive advantage. For example, a business which wishes to outperform its competitors
through differentiating itself through higher quality will have to perform its value chain activities better than the opposition. By contrast, a strategy based on seeking cost leadership will require a reduction in the costs associated with the value chain activities, or a reduction in the total amount of resources used. Primary Activities Primary value chain activities include: Primary Activity Inbound All those activities concerned with receiving and storing externally sourced Description
Page 35
Marketing and Essentially an information activity - informing buyers and consumers about sales Service products and services (benefits, use, price etc.) All those activities associated with maintaining product performance after the product has been sold Support Activities Support activities include: Secondary Activity Procurement This concerns how resources are acquired for a business (e.g. sourcing and negotiating with materials suppliers) Human Resource Management Technology Development Infrastructure Activities concerned with managing information processing and the development and protection of "knowledge" in a business Concerned with a wide range of support systems and functions such as finance, planning, quality control and general senior management Those activities concerned with recruiting, developing, motivating and rewarding the workforce of a business Description
Steps in Value Chain Analysis Value chain analysis can be broken down into a three sequential steps: (1) Break down a market/organization into its key activities under each of the major headings in the model;
Page 36
Internal strengths Internal weaknesses Opportunities in the external environment Threats in the external environment ASIA PACIFIC INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TCHNOLOGY Page 37
What the business does better than the competition What competitors do better than the business Whether the business is making the most of the opportunities available How a business should respond to changes in its external environment
The result of the analysis is a matrix of positive and negative factors for management to addre ss: Internal factors External factors Positive factors Strengths Opportunities Negative factors Weaknesses Threats
Are external to the business Relate to changes in the environment which will impact the business
Using SWOT analysis The key words are match and convert:
A key challenge for any business is to convert weaknesses into strengths. For example: Weakness Possible Response ASIA PACIFIC INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TCHNOLOGY Page 38
APPENDIX-4
Porter's Five Forces Model: analyzing industry structure Defining an industry An industry is a group of firms that market products which are close substitutes for each other (e.g. the car industry, the travel industry). Some industries are more profitable than others. Why? The answer lies in understanding the dynamics of competitive structure in an industry. The most influential analytical model for assessing the nature of competition in an industry is Michael Porter's Five Forces Model, which is described below:
Page 39
2.The costs of switching to substitutes Bargaining Power of Suppliers Suppliers are the businesses that supply materials & other products into the industry. The cost of items bought from suppliers (e.g. raw materials, components) can have a significant impact on a company's profitability. If suppliers have high bargaining power over a company, then in theory the company's industry is less attractive. Bargaining Power of Buyers Buyers are the people / organizations who create demand in an industry There Buyers are few threaten dominant to buyers integrate and many backward sellers into in the the industry. industry Page 40
The industry is not a key supplying group for buyers. Intensity of Rivalry The intensity of rivalry between competitors in an industry will depend on: The structure of competition - for example, rivalry is more intense where there are many small or equally sized competitors; rivalry is less when an industry has a clear market leader The structure of industry costs - for example, industries with high fixed costs encourage competitors to fill unused capacity by price cutting Degree of differentiation - industries where products are commodities (e.g. steel, coal) have greater rivalry; industries where competitors can differentiate their products have less rivalry Switching costs - rivalry is reduced where buyers have high switching costs - i.e. there is a significant cost associated with the decision to buy a product from an alternative supplier Strategic objectives - when competitors are pursuing aggressive growth strategies, rivalry is more intense. Where competitors are "milking" profits in a mature industry, the degree of rivalry is less Exit barriers - when barriers to leaving an industry are high (e.g. the cost of closing down factories) - then competitors tend to exhibit greater rivalry. APPENDIX-5 Competitive Advantage: A competitive advantage is an advantage over competitors gained by offering consumers greater value, either by means of lower prices or by providing greater benefits and service that justifies higher prices. Competitive Strategies: Following on from his work analyzing the competitive forces in an industry, Michael Porter suggested four "generic" business strategies that could be adopted in order to gain competitive advantage. The four strategies relate to the extent to which the scope of businesses' activities are narrow versus broad and the extent to which a business seeks to differentiate its products. ASIA PACIFIC INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TCHNOLOGY Page 41
The differentiation and cost leadership strategies seek competitive advantage in a broad range of market or industry segments. By contrast, the differentiation focus and cost focus strategies are adopted in a narrow market or industry. Differentiation This strategy involves selecting one or more criteria used by buyers in a market - and then positioning the business uniquely to meet those criteria. This strategy is usually associated with charging a premium price for the product - often to reflect the higher production costs and extra value-added features provided for the consumer. Differentiation is about charging a premium price that more than covers the additional production costs, and about giving customers clear reasons to prefer the product over other, less differentiated products. Examples of Differentiation Strategy: Mercedes cars; Bang & Olufsen Strategy - Cost Leadership With this strategy, the objective is to become the lowest-cost producer in the industry. Many (perhaps all) market segments in the industry are supplied with the emphasis placed minimizing costs. If the achieved selling price can at least equal (or near)the average for the market, then the lowest-cost producer will (in theory) enjoy the best profits. This strategy is usually associated with large-scale businesses offering "standard" products with relatively ASIA PACIFIC INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TCHNOLOGY Page 42
Page 43
Shareholder Look
Operational Effectiveness
APPENDIX-7 Porter Diamond Model According to Porter, as a rule competitive advantage of nations is the outcome of 4 interlinked advanced factors and activities in and between companies in these clusters. These can be influenced in a pro-active way by government. PORTER argued that a nation can create new advanced factor endowments such as skilled labor, a strong technology and knowledge base, government support, and culture. PORTER used a diamond shaped diagram ASIA PACIFIC INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TCHNOLOGY Page 44
BCG MATRIX OF PROTON MARKET SHARE HIGH LOW ASIA PACIFIC INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TCHNOLOGY Page 45
HIGH
STARS
QUESTION MARKS Proton can invest in increasing its market share in that country where the growth of market is high as currently does not fall in this category to move itself to STAR.
Proton can use its cash cow position to reach up to this category as it has now started to bring on new technology to increase its market share in new global market.
MARKET GROWTH
CASH COW
DOG
Proton should work to get position in In this category Proton should invest this cell. It has less percentage in this more on those product that are very old cell as the growth of other automobile industry has now started LOW increasing and the holding market share. in technology and have poor performance, as it is bringing up new version of Exora (Exora 2)
Using the BCG Box (an example is illustrated above) a company classifies all its SBU's according to two dimensions: On the horizontal axis: relative market share - this serves as a measure of SBU strength in the market On the vertical axis: market growth rate - this provides a measure of market attractiveness By dividing the matrix into four areas, four types of SBU can be distinguished: Stars - Stars are high growth businesses or products competing in markets where they are relatively strong compared with the competition. Often they need heavy investment to sustain their growth. Eventually their growth will slow and, assuming they maintain their relative market share, will become cash cows. Cash Cows - Cash cows are low-growth businesses or products with a relatively high market share. These are mature, successful businesses with relatively little need for investment. They need to be managed for continued profit - so that they continue to generate the strong cash flows that the company needs for its Stars. ASIA PACIFIC INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TCHNOLOGY Page 46
Page 47