Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TekogluR 1
TekogluR 1
TekogluR 1
Haluk Abbasoluna
65. Ya Armaan
EUERGETES
Festschrift fr
Prof. Dr. Haluk Abbasolu
zum 65. Geburtstag
EUERGETES
Festschrift fr
Prof. Dr. Haluk Abbasolu
zum 65. Geburtstag
II. Cilt
(Ayrbasm/Offprint)
Yayna Hazrlayanlar
nci DELEMEN
Sedef OKAY-KEPE
Akm ZDZBAY
zgr TURAK
Yayna Hazrlayanlar
nci DELEMEN
Sedef OK AY-KEPE
Akm ZDZBAY
zgr TUR AK
ISBN 978-605-4018-00-0
Suna - nan Kra Akdeniz Medeniyetleri Aratrma Enstits, Antalya 2008
Bu kitapta yaynlanan bildirilerin yaym hakk sakldr. AKMED ve yazarlarnn yazl izni olmakszn
hibir yolla oaltlamaz, baslamaz, yaynlanamaz.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner without written
permission from the AKMED and the authors.
indekiler
II. Cilt
Kaan ren
Sketches on the Archaeology of the Achaemenid Empire in Western Turkey . ...................................... 653
ehrazat Karagz
Darber wachen Verderben und Schrecken und Todeslos Erinyen als Grabwchter:
Zum Eunuchengrab in Anazarbos (Kilikien) .................................................................................................................................... 675
Zeynep Koel Erdem
Die Erscheinung des Bauwerks. Aspekte klassischer und hellenistischer Oberflchen . .............. 711
Taner Korkut
VI
Wolfram Martini
Krklareli Aa Pnar Kazsnda Bulunan Arkaik Dneme ait bir Zar ............................................................... 883
Ramazan zgan
Adana Arkeoloji Mzesinde Bulunan Klasik a Sonlarna ait bir Mezar Ta . ................................... 891
Hseyin Murat zgen
Alanya Mzesindeki Kilikya Kaynakl Tun a Pimi Toprak Figrinleri ............................................ 911
Mehmet zsait Nesrin zsait H. Il zsait Kocaba
VII
Friedhelm Prayon
Ein in situ entdecktes Kohlenbecken aus dem Haus des Lampon in Priene:
Neues zur Verwendung, Chronologie, Typologie und technischen Entwicklung
hellenistischer Kohlenbecken ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1077
Turgut Saner
Karasis Kalesinin (Kozan, Adana) Tarihlenmesi ve levi zerine Dnceler . ................................. 1097
Hakan Sivas
A Small Hoard of Drachms of Ariobarzanes I and II from Tire Museum ................................................... 1137
Recai Tekolu
Antalya Kaleiinde Ta Mimarideki Teknik Sreklilie ilikin bir Gzlem ............................................. 1205
Remzi Yac
A Grave at Soli Hyk from the Hittite Imperial Period .................................................................................................. 1217
Oya Yaz
I. Cilt
Suna - nan Kra
Anlar .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1
zgen Acar
The Collaboration of the Painters on Some South Ionian Orientalizing Vases ..................................... 109
Martin Bachmann
Obsidiyenin Gemiten Gnmze Yolcuu. Yar Bilimsel Yar rek (Ezoterik) bir Yaz ........ 127
Cevat Baaran
Dani Baykan
Assos Athena Tapnann Herakles-Kentauroslar Frizi iin Yeni bir Tmleme nerisi .......... 139
Oktay Belli
Von der Pferdedecke zum Sattel: Antike Reitkunst zwischen Ost und West .............................................. 167
Christine Bruns-zgan
Termessostan Sorunlu bir Agona Ik Tutan bir Agonistik Yazt Fragmenti . ........................................... 315
Nevzat evik
Demre (Myra) Aziz Nikolaos Kilisesinde Bulunan Cam Hac ieleri .............................................................. 351
Natalie de Chaisemartin
Hitite Metinlerde Reverans Yapmak: aruwai- ve hink- Fiilleri zerine bir Deneme .................... 389
evket Dnmez
Halk Perk Mzesinden Orta-Kuzey Anadolu Kkenli bir Grup Metal Eser ........................................... 405
Turan Efe
Akl Hyk Srtmeta Endstrisi Kesiciler ve Dier Ara, Silah ve Aletler Grubu ......................... 521
Ahmet Gle
Side Antik Tiyatrosu Sahne Binas 1992-2006 Yllar almalar Sonucu n Rapor . ..................... 541
Bilge Hrmzl
Mopsos Mitosu ve Bilimsel Gerekler: Perge ve Karatepenin Kuruluu zerine ................................. 571
Gl In
Gustave Moreau
Tarihselci Resim ve Oidipus ve Sfenks zerine konografik Yorumlar ......................................................... 601
Professor G. Neumann, whose great memory I will always remember, kindled in me the enthusiasm to study in the field of ancient Anatolian languages with his papers. One of his last works
titled Eine epichorische Inschrift was published in Die Akropolis von Perge 1. Survey und Sondagen
1994-1997 edited by H. Abbasolu and W. Martini in 2005. The fragmentary inscription that he
treated in this article was on the bottom of a crater found on the acropolis of Perge (inv.no. K
14.95.13). It gave him the opportunity to discuss an epichoric script from Perge dating back to
the sixth century B.C. Neumann read the fragmentary inscription as dai, seeing a resemblance
with the alphabetic signs of the Sidetian inscriptions. Even though he stated that there was more
than a gap of 200 hundred years between the archaeological date of this material and the early
appearance of the Sidetian signs on the coins of the fourth century B.C., he thought that a reading of the local script was possible on the basis of a comparison with the Sidetian. According to
his analysis the reading may concern a personal name like * or , abbreviated forms
of the Greek . It could appear in the form of dai in the Sidetian language.
On the occasion of celebrating the 65th birthday of carissimus magister H. Abbasolu, I am
pleased to present a new evaluation of this epichoric inscription from Perge. My results are as
follows:
1) A dating in the early sixth century B.C. is likely as several testimonies of epigraphic basis with
local scripts of fragmentary nature and of unknown origin like those in Sardis, Aphrodisias,
and others from Asia Minor also belong to the same time.
2) The script direction is sinistrorse; at least the Signs 2, 3 and 4 here give the impression that
were they cut into the surface from left to right.
3) The character of the script seems to be alphabetic as observed by Neumann.
4) Five signs can be counted in the inscription (fig. 1). As the four signs in Neumanns suggestion of reading can be really interpreted as dai when compared with the Sidetian signs, I will
not follow the same method, mainly because the Sign 5 was not attested among the Sidetian
signs. I will focus mainly on the interpretation of this sign.
Sign 1: not considered as a sign by Neumann.
Sign 2: as seen by Neumann.
Sign 3: as seen by Neumann.
Sign 4: seems to be rho reversed.
* Do.Dr. Recai Tekolu, Akdeniz niversitesi, Fen-Edebiyat Fakltesi, Eskia Dilleri ve Kltrleri Blm Kampus 07058
Antalya - Trkiye.
1144
Recai Tekolu
Sign 5: Neumann made a sketch like the transliteration of the Sidetian , as he thought that
the sign was varied in the form of Qoph known only in the Canaanite script on seals and precious small stones1. In fact it may belong to the western tradition in the Aegean area instead
of the Semitic. It shares a similarity in form with a certain sign known from some stamps and
graffiti from Sardis2 and in the so-called Psychro inscription from the island of Crete3.
The reading of a stamp on a fragmentary tile from Sardis (fig. 2) was suggested to be a ligature
writing of the word art, possibly an abbreviated form for a personal or divine name in Artimu
or Artima in Lydian or the sign of a manufacturer4. Meanwhile, the fragment of a simple bowl
rim (fig. 3), datable to the late seventh early sixth century B.C., included a ligature of two
letters and could be read as ati?5.
The tree symbols of the Psychro Inscription are more problematic (fig. 4). Since its publication, the authenticity and bilingualism of the inscription have been a matter of dispute6. Many
of the scholars who dedicated papers on the decipherment of the inscription sought a certain
connection of the symbols with some contents of Linear A and B and hieroglyphic Cretan
scripts7. We shall not discuss here the Psychro Inscription, but express that the sign under
examination is completely the same with that in the Psychro Inscription. We can suppose that
the sign was in use as a symbol or as a letter in some way in western Anatolia and maybe also in
the Aegean area. I see no reason to think that it was derived from a Semitic qoph model.
5) A reading of the inscription can not be suggested as it will always be hypothetic.
6) It is the earliest sample of any written material known so far in Pamphylia. It precedes the Sidetian by 200 years and the Pamphylian Greek dialect nearly by 250 years, as pointed out by
Neumann. Was indeed any script model in practice in Pamphylia at this time? We cannot be
sure about this issue without additional examples of the script in the region. First of all, the use
of a certain and defined script in practice needs a consensus in the social, economic, and governmental administration, and the attestation is sufficiently frequent. It seems likely to me that
the inscription from Perge represents a single case. In other words here the script itself may be
an instrument of a vigorous and expert manufacturer / entrepreneur to define his products.
What could its language be? As we know from the epigraphic documents found in the region
of the Hellenistic and Roman periods, some Pamphylian cities spoke different languages which
were connected to both the Greek and Anatolian substrata. But it is observed that even in the
Late Roman Imperial period the Pamphylian region may furnish a new epigraphic testimony of
an unknown language origin. Discussions on pre-classical languages of Pamphylia are apt to be
limited to assumptions at the present time.
For the development and diffusion of the script in Asia Minor, the inscription of Perge like
the other graffiti datable to the sixth century B.C. and onwards may play a role to discuss the existence of the tendency towards the use of script among individuals and particularly kerameikoi
before any Semitic, Greek, or Persian influence.
1 Neumann 2005: 165.
2 Gusmani 1975: pl. 31 A 3.1 and 52 B 2.8.
3 Marinatos 1958: 227ff.
4 Gusmani 1975: 36.
5 Gusmani 1975: 76.
6 Cf. Kritzas 2004 [2006]: 255-261. He was of the opinion that it was a modern fake.
7 Brice 1959: 330; Davis 1961: 26-35; Raison Brixhe 1961: 127-136; Gordon 1962: 213 ff; Stieglitz 1976: 84-86; Andray 1978:
4-46; Brown 1978: 43-46; Finkelberg 2002/2003[2006]: 95-97. Cf. Neumanns review (1962) on Davis publication.
1145
Bibliography
Andray, C.
1978
The Eteocretan Inscription from Psychro,
Kadmos 17.1: 4-46.
Brown, R.B.
1978
Eteocretan Inscription from Psychro, Kadmos 17.2: 43-46.
Davies, S.
1961
The Phaistos Disk and the Eteocretan Inscriptions from Psychro and Praisos, Johannesburg.
Finkelberg, M.
2002/2003
[2006]
Eteocretan Inscription from Psychro and
Goddess of Thalamai, Minos 37/38: 95-97.
Gordon, C.H.
1962
Eteocretan, JNES 21.3: 211-214.
Gusmani, R.
1975
Neue epichorische Schriftzeugnisse aus Sardis, Harvard.
Marinatos, S.
1958
Grammatn Didaskalia, Minoica. Festschrift fr J. Sundwall, ed. E. Grumach, Berlin: 226-231.
Neumann, G.
1962
Rec. Davis, S., The Phaistos Disk and the
Eteocretan Inscriptions from Psychro and
Praisos, 1961, Gnomon 34: 574-578.
2005
Eine epichorische Inschrift, Abbasolu H.
W. Martini (Hrsg.) Die Akropolis von Perge
1. Survey und Sondagen 1994-1997, Mainz:
165-166.
Raison J. C. Brixhe
1961
Compte rendu de Minoica, Kratylos 4: 127136.
Stieglitz, R.
1976
The Eteocretan Inscription from Psychro,
Kadmos 15: 84-86.
Recai Tekolu
1146