Br.

no 60

AMPL
I. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Estimation of design discharge in respect of Bridge No: 60 @ Ch :33127.676 m Proposed bridge 3 x 30.5. PSC Slab Physiographic Parameters:
Catchment area Length of longest stream from source to bridge site (L) Bed Level Level at the farthest point: Height of farthest point along the point of interest along river Length of the Stream from bridge site to nearer to the C.G Soil Sub zone Proposed formation level A L BL FL H Lc = = = = = = = = = 45.75 Sq Km 11.000 Km 510.280 m 535.28 m 25.000 m 3.250 Km SANDY CLAY 3(d) m

II. Calculation of Equivalent Stream Slope (S)

Equivalent slope S = SLix(Di-1+ Di)/L2 Height Above Datum Di 0.000 2.3 4.6 6.9 9.2 11.5 13.8 16.1 18.4 20.7 23.0 25.0

S.No

R.L (m) 510.280 512.6 514.9 517.2 519.5 521.8 524.1 526.4 528.7 531.0 533.3 535.3

Distance (Km) 0.000 1.000 2.000 3.000 4.000 5.000 6.000 7.000 8.000 9.000 10.000 11.000

Segment Length Li 0.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000

Di-1+Di Li(Di-1+Di)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Total \

0.000 2.300 6.900 11.500 16.100 20.700 25.300 29.900 34.500 39.100 43.700 48.000

0.00 2.30 6.90 11.50 16.10 20.70 25.30 29.90 34.50 39.10 43.70 48.00 278.0 S = 2.298 m/Km

Equivalent Slope

III. Calculation of Sythetic Unit Hydrograph Parameters

(i) Time from center of unit excess rainfall duration t peak of unit hydrograph Round this value to nearest 0.5 value L Lc 0.261 [ ] Tp=1.757

tp

= = = =

4.01 4.50

hrs hrs

(ii) Peak Discharge of Unit Hydrograph per catchment area

qp

1.260 tp-0.725 0.423 m3/s/Km2

(iii) Width of the 50% Discharge Ordinate of Unit Hydrograph

W50 W50 W75 W75 WR50 WR50 WR75 WR75 TB

= = = = = = = = = = =

1.974(qp)-1.104 5.1 hrs

(iv) Width of the 75% Discharge Ordinate of Unit Hydrograph

0.961(qp)-1.125 2.527 hrs

(v) Width of rising side Discharge Ordinate of 50% Unit Hydrograph

1.150(qp)-0.829 2.34 hrs

(vi) Width of rising side Discharge Ordinate of 75% Unit Hydrograph

0.527(qp)-0.932 1.174 hrs

(vii) Base width of the Unit Hydrograph

5.411 (tp)0.826 19.00 1.0 hrs hrs

(viii) Unit Duration of Unit Hydrograph

tr

Page 1

Br.no 60
(ix) Time to start of rise to the peak of Unit Hydrograph (x) Peak Discharge of Unit Hydrograph Tm Qp = = 5.0 hrs

3 19.372 m /s

Page 2

Br.no 60
Estimated Unit Hydrograph Parameters were plotted on graph paper . The Plotted papers were joined to draw synthetic unit hydrograph
Synthetic Unit Hydrograph
1Hour SUG Ordinates Hr.
16

Ordinate

14

20.0 18.0 16.0 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0
0

12

10

02

10

10

12

15

14

16

20

18

20

25

22

Time in Hours

The summation of Discharge Ordinates of the unit Hydrograph of 1hr interval Thoeritically equal to Q= (A x d)/0.36*tr) Where A d = = Catchment Area 1.0 cm Depth Q =

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

0.0 2.0 4.0 10.0 15.0 19.00 16.00 12.0 9.00 8.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 2.4 2.0 2.0 1.7 1.5 1 0.75 0

Discharge in Cumecs

Theoritical Discharge Revise the Ordinates of Hydrograph equal to therotical Discharge

127.31 3 127.08 m /s

IV. Estimation of Design Storm

a) Design Storm Duration The Design Storm Duration

(Refer Flood Estimation Report for 3d sub zone) TD = 1.1xtp TD = 5.00 hrs

b) Estimation of Point Rainfall and Areal Rainfall for Storm Duration R50 24 hour point rainfall (Refer Plate 9) = 24 cm Conversion factor (Refer Fig.10) = 0.69 R50 5 hour point rainfall = 16.56 cm Areal Reduction Factor for 45.75 Sq.Km catchment area (Refer Ann-4.2) = 0.975 R50 hour areal rainfall = 16.143 cm This 50 year design storm hour areal rainfall has been split in to 1-hour rainfall increments using time distribution coefficients given in Annexure-4.1 or fig-11 of F.E.R-3(d) Storm Rainfall cm 10.332 13.399 14.690 15.659 16.143 Rainfall Increment cm 10.332 3.067 1.291 0.969 0.484 Loss Rate/Hr cm/hr 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 Effective Hourly Rainfall cm 10.107 2.842 1.066 0.744 0.259

Duration

coefficient

hr 1 2 3 4 5

0.64 0.83 0.91 0.97 1

V. Estimation of Peak Discharge

For estimation of peak discharge, effecitve rainfall increments were arranged against ordinates in descending order. Sum of product of U.G ordinates and gives total direct surface runoff and base flow gives Total Peak Discharge S.U.G 1-Hour Ordinates Ef. Raifall (m3/s) 19.37236 14.52927 9.686181 cm 10.10672 2.842229 1.066465 Direct Runoff (m3/s) 195.791 41.29551 10.32997

Time (Hours) 5 6.35 7.7

Page 3

Br.no 60
10 11 12 Total Base Flow for the catchment area Peak Discharge 7 5 4 0.743599 0.259299 0 5.20519 1.296496 0 253.92 m3/s (Refer para 3.6) = = 4.58 m3/s

=Direct surface runoff + base flow

3 258.49 m /s

Page 4

Br.no 60
VI. Water way calculation
(i) Design discharge as per Synthetic Unit Hydrograph method (ii) Assumed velocity (iii) Required area of water way (iv) Poposed Linear water way (v) Required Depth of water way = area of water way / Proposed Linear water way (vi) Designed HFL (vii) Required Vertical Clearance Provided Vertical Clearance (viii) Thickness of the slab (ix) Free board Required (Minimum) Free board Provided (FL-Designed HFL) (x) Bed level to formation level Hence proposed bridge is 3 x 30.5 x PSC Slab VII. Scour depth calculation (i) Design discharge Q is Add 30% for foundation discharge Q V A0 = = = =
3 258.49 m /s 2.44 m/sec

83.38

sqm

91.500 m

= = = = = = = =

0.91

511.19 m 1.108 1.108 2.25 1.00 3.36 4.269 m m m m m m

= =

3 258.49 m /s 3 336.04 m /s

1. 811 xCx
According to Lacey's formula Linear Water way= Where C= Coefficient taken as 2.67 (ii) Normal scour depth D=0.473(Q/f)0.345

Q
= 77.74 m

= = = = =

2.72 1.76 4.09 4.54 3.62

where for value of ' f ' refer 4.6.5 as per Bridge Substructure Code (iii) Maximum scour depth for abutment = 1.5*D (iv) Height from bottom of foundation to HFL is (v) Depth of Curtain wall / Drop wall below bed level References: 1 Bridge substructures & Foundation code 2 Flood Estimation Methods (RBF: 16) (If Catchment area <25 Sq.Km) 3 Flood Estimation Report for Mahanadi Sub zone -3(d) of February-1997

m m m

Page 5