SO FAR: Combined are Knowledge in an Uncertain World, The Case for Contextualism: Knowledge, Skepticism, and Context, Knowledge

and Lotteries, Rysiew, Cohen, and that partial bibliography you sent, and Jessica Brown, Alston, William P. 2005. Beyond justification Dimensions of Epistemic Evaluation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Annis, David. 1978. A Contextualist Theory of Epistemic Justification, America Philosophical Quarterly 15: 213-19. Armstrong, D. M. 1973. Belief Truth, and Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Austin, J. L. 1979. Other Minds, in Austin, Philosophical Papers, 3rd edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 76-116. _____ 1979. A Plea for Excuses, in Austin, Philosophical Papers, 3rd edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 175204. Audi, Robert. 1988. Belief, Justification and Knowledge (Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth). _____ 1991. Justification, Deductive Closure and Reasons to Believe, Dialogue: 77-84. _____ 2002. Sources of Knowledge. In P. Moser (ed.) Oxford Handbook of Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 71-94. Ayer, A.J. 1956. The Problem of Knowledge (London: Macmillan). Bach, Kent (forthcoming). Applying Pragmatics to Epistemology. Philosophica1 Issues 18. _____ 1999. The Myth of Conventional Implicature, Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 327-66. _____ 2005. The Emperors New Knows. In G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds.) Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 51-90. Baron, Marcia. 2005. Justification and Excuses. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 2: 387-413. Birch, Susan A. J. and Bloom, Paul. 2004. Understanding Childrens and Adults Limitations in Mental State Reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8: 255-60. Black, Max. 1952. Saying and Disbelieving, Analysis 13: 25-33.

Blackson, Thomas A. 2004. An Invalid Argument for Contextualism, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68: 344-5. Blaizot, J. P., Iliopoulos, J., Madsen, J., Ross, G. G., Sonderegger, P., and Specht, H.J. 2003. Study of Potentially Dangerous Events During Heavy-Ion Collisions at the LHC: Report of the LHC Safety Study Group. Geneva: CERN. Bor, Stephen, and Lycan, William. 1975. Knowing Who, Philosophical Studies 28: 299-344. _____ _____ 1986. Knowing Who, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Bonjour, Laurence. 1985. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. _____ 1986. Can Empirical Knowledge Have a Foundation? In P. Moser (ed.) Empirical Knowledge. 2nd edn. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield: 97-120. _____ 2001. Toward a Defense of Empirical Foundationalism. In M. R. DePaul (ed.) Resurrecting Old-Fashioned Foundationalism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield: 21-40. _____ 2002. Epistemology: C2assic Problems and Contemporary Responses. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Braithwaite, R. B. 1932-3. The Nature of Believing. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 33: 129-46. Bratman, Michael. 1992. Practical Reasoning and Acceptance in a Context. Mind 101: 1-15. Braun, David. 2006. Now You Know Who Hong Oak Yun Is, Philosophical Issues 16: 24-42. Broome, John. 1991. Weighing Goods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Brown, Jessica. 2000. 'Critical Reasoning, Understanding, and Self-Knowledge',

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Vol. LXI, No. 3 pp 659-77. _____ 2003. "The Reductio Argument and Transmission of Warrant", in Nuccetelli, ed., New Essays on Semantic Externalism, Scepticism, and Self-Knowledge, MIT. _____ 2004. 'Noninferential justification and epistemic circularity'. Analysis. _____ 2004. Anti-Individualism and Knowledge. MIT Press. _____ 2005. Doubt, Circularity, and the Moorean Response to the Sceptic, Philosophical Perspectives.

_____ 2005. Comparing Contextualism and Invariantism on the Correctness of Contextualist Intuitions, Grazer Philosophische Studien. _____ 2005. Adapt or Die: the Death of Invariantism?' Philosophical Quarterly Special Issue on Contextualism. 263-286. _____ 2005. Williamson on Luminosity and Contextualism.' Philosophical Quarterly Special Issue on Contextualism.319-327. _____ 2006. 'Contextualism and warranted assertibility manoeuvres', Philosophical Studies 130:407-435. _____ 2008. The Knowledge Norm for Assertion'. Philosophical Issues 18:89-103. _____ 2008. "Subject-Sensitive Invariantism and the Knowledge Norm for Practical Reasoning". Nous 42, 2: 167-189. _____ 2008. Knowledge and Practical Reason.' Philosophy Compass. _____ 2008. Internalism and Externalism in Internalism and Externalism: Mind and Epistemology, ed. S. Goldberg,, OUP. _____ 2008. Anti-Individualism and Self-Knowledge, entry for the Oxford Handbook in the Philosophy of Mind, eds. Beckermann and McLaughlin, OUP. _____ Forthcoming. "Experimental-philosophy, contextualism and subject-sensitive invariantism". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. _____ Forthcoming. "Fallibilism and the Knowledge Norm for Assertion and Practical Reasoning". In Brown and Cappelen (eds.). Assertion. OUP: Oxford. _____ Forthcoming. "Assertion and practical reasoning: common or divergent epistemic standards". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. _____ Forthcoming. "Knowledge and Assertion". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Brueckner, Anthony. 1985. Skepticism and Epistemic Closure, Philosophical Topics, 13: 89-117. _____ 1994. The Shifting Content of Knowledge Attributions, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54: 123-6. _____ 2000. Klein on Closure and Skepticism, Philosophical Studies, 98: 139-51. Cappelen, Herman, and Lepore, Ernie 2005. Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism, Maiden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing. _____ _____ 2006. Replies [to Kent Bach; John Hawthorne; Kepa Korta and John Perry, and Robert J. Stainton], Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73: 469-92.

Carroll, Lewis. 1895. What the Tortoise Said to Achilles, Mind, 4: 278-80. Christensen, David. 2007. Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News, Philosophical Review 116: 187-217. Chomsky, Noam. 1980. Rules and Representations (New York: Columbia University Press). _____ 1993. Language and Thought (London: Moyer Bell). _____ 2000. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Cohen, Stewart. 1984. Justification and Truth. Philosophical Studies 46 (3): 27995. _____ 1986. Knowledge and Context, Journal of Philosophy 83: 574-83. _____ 1987. Knowledge, Context, and Social Standards, Synthese 73: 3-26. _____ 1988. How to be a Fallibilist, Philosophical Perspectives, 2: 91123. _____ 1991. Skepticism, Relevance, and Relativity, in Brian McLaughlin (ed.), Dretske and his Critics (Cambridge: Blackwell). _____ 1998. Contextualist Solutions to Epistemological Problems: Skepticism, Gettier, and the Lottery, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 76: 289-306. _____ 1999. Contextualism, Skepticism, and the Structure of Reasons, Philosophical Perspectives 13: 57-89. _____ 2000. Contextualism and Skepticism, Philosophical Topics, 10: 94-107. _____ 2001. Contextualism Defended, Philosophical Studies 103: 87-98. _____ 2002. Basic Knowledge and the Problem of Easy Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 6: 309-29. _____ 2004. Knowledge, Assertion, and Practical Reasoning. Philosophical Issues 14 (1): 482491. _____ 2004. Contextualism and Unhappy-Face Solutions: Reply to Schiffer, Philosophical Studies 119: 185-97. _____ 2005. Why Basic Knowledge is Easy Knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2): 417430. _____ 2009. Knowledge as Aptness. Philosophical Studies 144 (1):121-125. _____ 2010. Luminosity, Reliability, and the Sorites. Philosophy and

Phenomenological Research 81 (3): 718-730. _____ & Keith Lehrer. 1983. Justification, Truth, and Coherence. Synthese 55 (2): 191-207. Crimmins, Mark, and Perry, John. 1989. The Prince and the Phone Booth: Reporting Puzzling Beliefs, Journal of Philosophy 86: 685-711. Conee, Earl and Richard Feldman. 2004. Evidentialism. Oxford University Press. DeRose, Keith. 1990. Knowledge, Epistemic Possibility, and Scepticism, Ph.D. diss., University of California, Los Angeles; University Microfilms International. _____ 1991. Epistemic Possibilities , Philosophical Review 100: 581-605. _____ 1992. Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52: 91329. _____ 1994. Lewis on Might and Would Counterfactual Conditionals, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 24: 413-18. _____ 1995. Solving the Skeptical Problem, Philosophical Review l04: 1-52. _____ 1996. Knowledge Assertion, and Lotteries, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74: 568-80. _____ 1996. Contextualism, in D. M. Borchert (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Supplement, New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan, 111-13. _____ 1996. Relevant Alternatives and the Content of Knowledge Attributions, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56: 193-7. _____ 1998. Simple Mights, Indicative Possibilities, and the Open Future, The Philosophical Quarterly 48: 67-82. _____ 1999. Contextualism: An Explanation and Defense, in J. Greco and E. Sosa (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, Maiden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers, 187205. _____ 1999. Can It Be That It Would Have Been Even Though It Might Not Have Been?, Philosophical Perspectives 13: 385-413. _____ 1999. Responding to Skepticism, in K. DeRose and T. A. Warfield (eds.), Skepticism: A Contemporary Reader, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1-24. _____ 2000. Now You Know It, Now You Dont, in Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, v: Epistemology, Bowling Green, Oh.: Philosophy Documentation Center, 91-106 _____ 2002. Assertion, Knowledge, and Context, Philosophical Review III: 167-203.

_____ 2002. Review of Williamson (2000), British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53: 573-7. _____ 2004. The Problem with Subject-Sensitive Invariantism, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68: 346-50. _____ 2004. Sosa, Safety, Sensitivity, and Skeptical Hypotheses, in J. Greco (ed.), Ernest Sosa and his Critics, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 22-41. _____ 2005. Direct Warrant Realism, in A. Dole and A. Chignell (eds.), God and the Ethics of Belief: New Essays in Philosophy of Religion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 150-72. _____ 2005. The Ordinary Language Basis for Contextualism and the New Invariantism, Philosophical Quarterly 55: 172-98. _____ 2007. Review of Stanley (2005), Mind 116: 486-9. _____ 2008. Gradable Adjectives: A Defence of Pluralism, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86: 141-60. _____ 2009. The Case for Contextualism: Knowledge, Skepticism, and Context. Oxford University Press. _____ and Grandy, Richard E. 1999. Conditional Assertions and Biscuit Conditionals, Nous 33: 405-20. Donnellan, Keith 1966. Reference and Definite Descriptions, Philosophical Review 75: 281-304. _____ 1968. Putting Humpty Dumpty Together Again, Philosophical Review 77: 20315. _____ 1978. Speaker Reference, Descriptions, and Anaphora, in Syntax and Senantics, vol. ix, Academic Press. Page references to the reprint in P. French, T. Uehling, and H. Wettstein (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1979), 28-44. Dougherty, Trent and Rysiew, Patrick. 2009. Fallibilism, Epistemic Possibility, and Concessive Knowledge Attributions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78: 128-32. Douven, Igor. 2006. Assertion, Knowledge, and Rational Credibility, Philosophical Review 115: 449-85. Dretske, Fred. 1970. Epistemic Operators , Journal of Philosophy 67: 1007-23. (1971), Conclusive Reasons, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 49: 1-22. _____ 1981. Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

_____ 2000. Epistemic Operators, in Dretske, Perception, knowledge and Belief (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). _____ 2000. The Pragmatic Dimension of Knowledge, in Dretske, Perception, Knowledge and Belief (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). _____ 2005. The Case against Closure, in M. Steup and E. Sosa (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 13-26. _____ 2005. Reply to Hawthorne, in M. Steup and E. Sosa (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 43-6. Dudman, V. H. 1992. Probability and Assertion, Analysis 52: 204-11. Edwards, Gareth. 2005. End Day. Television Broadcast. BBC. Elga, Adam. 2007. Reflection and Disagreement, Nous 41: 478-502. Engel, Pascal. 2009. Pragmatic Encroachment and Epistemic Value. In Adrian Haddock, Alan Millar, and Duncan Pritchard, editors, Epistemic Value. Oxford University Press. Fantl, Jeremy, and McGrath, Matthew. 2002. Evidence, Pragmatics, and Justification, Philosophical Review III: 67-94. _____ _____ 2007. On Pragmatic Encroachment in Epistemology, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75: 558-9. _____ _____ Knowledge in an Uncertain World. Oxford University Press, 2009. Feldman, Richard. 1981. Fallibilism and Knowing that One Knows. The Philosophical Review 90: 77-93. _____ 1985. Reliability and justification, The Monist, 68: 159-74. _____ 1995. In Defense of Closure, Philosophical Quarterly, 45 487-94. _____ 1999. Contextualism and Skepticism, Philosophical Perspectives 13: 93-115. _____ 2001. Skeptical Problems, Contextualist Solutions, Philosophical Studies, 103: 61-85. _____ 2003. Epistemology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. _____ 2006. Epistemological Puzzles about Disagreement, in S. Hetherington (ed.), Epistemology Futures, New York: Oxford University Press: 216-36. _____ 2007. Knowledge and Lotteries. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research

75: 211-26. _____ and Warfield, Ted (eds.) forthcoming. Disagreement, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Feltz, Adam and Zarpentine, Chris (manuscript). Do You Know More When It Matters Less? Fine, Kit (1975), Vagueness, Truth and Logic, Synthese, 30: 265-300. Foley, Richard. 1993. Working Without a Net. Oxford: Oxford University Press. _____ 1999. Contextualism and Skepticism, Philosophical Perspectives, 13: 91-114. Frances, Bryan. 2005. Scepticism Comes Alive. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fumerton, Richard. 1987. Nozicks Epistemology, in S. Luper-Foy (ed.), The Possibility of Knowledge (Rowman & Allenheld). _____ 1995. Metaepistemology anti Skepticism. Lanharn, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. _____ 2001. Classical Foundationalism. In M. R. DePaul (ed.) Resurrecting OldFashioned Foundationalism. Lanham, MI): Rowman & Littlefield: 3-20. Ganson, Dorit. 2008. Evidentialism and Pragmatic Constraints on Outright Belier. Philosophical Studies 139: 441-58. Gendler, Tamar Szab and Hawthorne, John. 2005. The Real Guide to Fake Barns: A Catalogue of Gifts or Your Epistemic Enemies. Philosophical Studies 124: 331-52. Gettier, Edmund L. 1963. Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?, Analysis 23: 121-3. Goldman, Alvin. 1976. Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge ,Journal of Philosophy 73: 771-91. _____ 1979. What Is Justified Belief? In G. S. Pappas (ed.) Justification and Knowledge. Dordrect: Reidel: 1-23. _____ 1986. Epistemology and Cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. _____ 1992. Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. _____ 1999. Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. _____ (forthcoming). Williamson on Knowledge and Evidence. In D. Pritchard (ed.) Williamson on Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gordon, Robert M. 1987. The Structure of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Greco, John. 2009. Whats Wrong with Contextualism? The Philosophical Quarterly 58: 416-36. Grice, H. P. 1961. The Causal Theory of Perception, Proceedings of the Aristotelian, Society Supplementary Vol. 35: 121-52. _____ 1989. Studies in the Way of Words, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Halliday, Daniel. 2007. Contextualism, Comparatives, and Gradability, Philosophical Studies 132: 381-93. Hambourger, Robert. 1987. Justified Assertion and the Relativity of Knowledge, Philosophical Studies 51: 241-69. Harman, Gilbert. 2007. Epistemic Contextualism as a Theory of Primary Speaker Meaning. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75: 173-9. Harman, Gilbert and Sherman, Brett. 2004. Knowledge, Assumptions, Lotteries. Philosophical Issues 14 (Epistemology): 492-500. Hawthorne, John. 2000. Implicit Belief and A Priori Knowledge, Southern Journal of Philosophy 38, Spindel Conference Supplement: 191-10. _____ 2004. Knowledge and Lotteries, Oxford: Oxford University Press. _____ 2005. The Case for Closure, in M. Steup and E. Sosa (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 26-43. _____ 2006. Testing for Context-Dependence, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73: 443-50 _____ and Jason Stanley. 2008. Knowledge and Action. Journal of Philosophy, 105(10): 571590. Hazlett, Allan. 2006. How to Defeat Belief in the External World. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87: 198-212. Henderson, David. 2009. Motivated Contextualism. Philosophical Studies 142: 119-31. Hetherington, Stephen. 2005. Knowing (How It is) that P: Degrees and Qualities of Knowledge. Veritas 50: 99-107. Hinton, J. M. 1969. Review of Theory of Knowledge. The Philosophical Review 78: 383-86. Hookway, Chirstopher. 1990. Scepticism. Routledge.

Huerner, Michael. 2001. Skepticism and the Veil of Perception. New York: Rowman and Littlefield. _____ 2007. Moores Paradox and the Norm of Belief. In S. Nuccetelli and G. Seau (eds.) Themes from G. E Moore. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 142-57. Hyman, John. 1999. How Knowledge Works. The Philosophical Quarterly 49: 433-51. _____ 2006. Knowledge and Evidence. Mind, 115: 891916. James, William. 1962. The Will to Believe. In W. Barrett and H. D. Aiken (eds.) Philosophy in the Twentieth Century. New York: Random House: 241-58 Jeffrey, Richard C. 1983. The Logic of Decision. Chicago: University of Chicago Press _____ 1992. Probability and the Art of Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Johnson E., Hershey, J., Meszaros, J., and Kunreuther, H. 2000. Framing, Probability Distortions, and Insurance Decisions, in Kahneman and Tversky (2000). Kahneman, Daniel and Tversky, Amos. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision and Risk. Econometrica 47: 263-92. ____ _____ 1982. Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness, in Kahneman et al. (1982). ____ _____ 1982. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, in Kahneman etal. (1982). ____ _____ 2000. (Choices, Values and Frames (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Kamp, Hans. 1975. Two Theories of Adjectives, in E. Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). _____ 1981. The Paradox of the Heap, in U. Monnich (ed.), Aspects of Philosophical Logic (Dordrecht: Reidel). Kaplan, Mark. 1996. Decision Theory as Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kenny, A. J. 1966. Practical Inference. Analysis 26: 65-75. King, Jeffrey 2002. Designating Propositions. The Philosophical Review 111: 341-71. Klein, E. 1980. A Semantics for Positive and Comparative Adjectives, Linguistics and Philosophy, 4: 1-45.

_____ 1991. Comparatives, in A. Stechow and D. Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik/ Semantics. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research (Berlin: De Gruyter). Klein, Peter. 1995. Skepticism and Closure: Why the Evil Genius Argument Fails, Philosophical Topics, 23: 213-36. Kripke, Saul. 1977. Speakers Reference and Semantic Reference, in P. French, T Uehling, and H. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 2 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press). _____ 1980. Naming and Necessity (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University _____ 1982. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press). _____ 1997. A Puzzle about Belief, in Ludlow (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Language (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT; first pub. in A. Margalit (ed.), Meaning and Use (Dordrecht: Reidel 1979). Kyburg, Henry. 1961. Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief (Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press). _____ 1970. Conjunctivitis, in M. Swain (ed.), Induction, Acceptance, and Rational Belief (Dordrecht: Reidel). Lawlor, K. (forthcoming), What the Contextualist Should Really Say to the Skeptic. Lepore, Ernest, and Cappelen, Herman. 1997. On an Alleged Connection between Indirect Speech and Theory of Meaning, Mind and Language, 12: 278-96. Lewis, David. 1983. Scorekeeping in a Language Game, in Lewis, Philosophical Papers, vol. i (Oxford: Oxford University Press). _____ 1986. Counterfactual Dependence and Times Arrow, in Lewis, Philosophical Papers, vol. ii (Oxford: Oxford University Press). _____ 1986. Causal Decision Theory, in Lewis, Philosophical Papers, vol. ii (Oxford: Oxford University Press). _____ 1994. Humean Supervenience Debugged, Mind, 103: 473-90. _____ 1996. Elusive Knowledge, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74: 549-67. _____ 1999. Putnams Paradox, in Lewis, Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Lichtenstein, Sarah, Fischhoff, Baruch, and Phillips, Lawrence, D. 1982. Calibration of Probabilities: The State of the Art to 1980, in Kahneman et al. (1982).

Luper-Foy, Steven. 1984. The Epistemic Predicament: Knowledge, Nozickian Tracking, and Skepticism, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 62: 26-49. Makinson, D. H. 1965. The Paradox of the Preface, Analysis, 25: 205-7. Malcolm, Norman. 1963. The Verification Argument, in Malcolm, Knowledge and Certainty (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall). Manley, David (unpub.), Knowledge and Psychological Explanation. Mellor, D. H. 1980. Consciousness and Degrees of Belief. In D. H. Mellor, (ed.) Prospects for Pragmatism: Essays in Memory of F. P. Ramsey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 139-73. Meyer, J.J. 2001. Epistemic Logic, in L. Goble (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic (Oxford: Blackwell). Millar, Alan. 1991. Reasons and Experience. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Moltmann, Friederike. 2003. Propositional Attitudes without Propositions. Synthese 135: 77-118. Moore, G. E. 1959. Philosophical Papers, London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd. _____ 1962. Commonplace Book: 1919-1953, London: Allen & Unwin. _____ 1993. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Moran, Richard. 2001. Authority and Estrangement: An Essay on Self-Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Moyal-Sharrock, Danile. 2003. Logic in Action: Wittgensteins Logical Pragmatism and the Impotence of Skepticism. Philosophical Investigations 26: 125-48. Muir, Hazel. 2008. Particle smasher not a threat to the Earth. May 8, 2008. <http://www.newscientist.com/articlc.ns?id=dn13555>. Nagel, Jennifer. 2007. Epistemic Intuitions, Philosophy Compass 2/6: 792-819. _____ 2008. Knowledge Ascriptions and the Psychological Consequences of Changing Stakes. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86: 279-94. _____ (forthcoming). Knowledge Ascriptions and the Psychological Consequences of Thinking about Error. Philosophical Quarterly. Nelkin, Dana K. 2000. The Lottery Paradox, Knowledge, and Rationality, Philosophical Review, 109: 373-409. Neta, Ram. 2002. S Knows That P, Nous, 36: 663-81.

_____ 2007. Anti-intellectualism and the Knowledge-Action Principle. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75: 180-7. _____ 2007. Propositional Justification, Evidence, and the Cost of Error. Philosophical Issues 17: 197-216. _____ and Phelan, Mark (manuscript). Evidence that Stakes Dont Matter for Evidence. Nichols, S., Stich, S., and Weinberg, J. (forthcoming), Metaskepticism: Meditations in Ethno-Epistemology, in S. Luper (ed.), The Skeptics (Burlington, Vt.: Ashgate). Nozick, Robert. 1981. Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Overbye, Dennis. 2008. Asking a Judge to Save the World, and Maybe a Whole Lot More. New York Times. New York. Owens, David. 2000. Reason Without Freedom: The Problem of Epistemic Normativity. Routledge, London. _____ 2008. Freedom and Practical Judgement. March 17, 2008. Palmer, F. R. 2001. Mood and Modality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Parfit, Derek (forthcoming). Climbing the Mountain. _____ 2011. On What Matters. Oxford University Press. Peirce, C. S. 1931. Collected Papers, ed. C. Hartshorne, and P. Weiss. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1897. Fallibilism, Continuity, and Evolution. In Collected Papers, ed. C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press: 14175. Plantinga, Alvin. 1993. Warrant: the Current Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press _____ 1995. Prcis of Warrant: The Current Debate and Warrant and Proper Function, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55: 393-6. Pollock, John. 1986. Contemporary Theories of Knowledge. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield. Pritchard, Duncan. 2001. Radical Scepticism, Epistemological Externalism, and Hinge Propositions. In D. Salehi (ed.) Wittgenstein-Jahrbuch 2001/2002. Berlin: Peter Lang: 97-122. Pritchard, Duncan. 2005. Epistemtic Luck. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pryor, James. 2000. The Skeptic and the Dogmatist, Nous, 34: 517-49. Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1977. Intensions Revisited, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 2:5-II. Page references to the reprint in P. French, T Uehling, and H Wettstein (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1979), 268-74. _____ 1990. Pursuit of Truth (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press). Radford, Colin. 1966. Knowledge - by Examples, Analysis, 27: I-II. _____ 1967. Knowing But Not Believing, Analysis, 27: 139-40. Reed, Baron. 2002. How to Think About Fallibilism. Philosophical Studies 107: 14357. _____ (forthcoming). A Defense of Stable Invariantism. Nous. Richard, Mark. 2004. Contextualism and Relativism, Philosophical Studies 199: 215-42. Riggs, Wayne. 2003. Balancing Our Epistemic Goals. Nous 37: 342-52. Ross, W. D. 2002. The Right and the Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Royzman, Edward B., Cassidy, Kimberly Wright, and Baron, Jonathan (2003). I Know, You Know: Epistemic Egocentrism in Children and Adults. Review of General Psychology 7: 38-65. Rudner. Richard. 1953. The Scientist qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments. Philosophy of Science 20: 1-6. Rusiecki, J. 1985. Adjectives and comparison in English: A Semantic Study (New York: Longman). Russell, Bertrand. 1912. The Problems of Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Rysiew, Patrick. 2001. The Context-Sensitivity of Knowledge Attributions. Nous 35: 477-514. _____ 2002. "Reid and Epistemic Naturalism," The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 52, No. 209 (October): 437-456. _____ 2003. "Goldman's Knowledge in a Social World: Correspondence Truth and the Place of Justification in a Veritistic Social Epistemology," Protosociology, Vol. 18-19: 409-422. _____ 2004. "Analyzing Knowledge Management Systems: A Veritistic Approach"

(with Palash Bera), Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Philosophy and Informatics (Cologne). _____ 2005. Contesting Contextualism, Grazer Philosophische Studien 69: 51-69. _____ 2005. "Introduction," Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology, Vol. 1, No. 3: 163-168. _____ 2007. "Beyond Words: Communication, Truthfulness, and Understanding," Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology, Vol. 4, No. 3: 285-304. _____ 2007. "Epistemic Contextualism," Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. _____ 2007. Speaking of Knowing. Nous 41: 627-62. _____ 2008. "Rationality Disputes - Psychology and Epistemology," Philosophy Compass, Vol. 3, Issue 6: 1153-1176. _____ 2009. "Fallibilism, Epistemic Possibility, and Concessive Knowledge Attributions" (with Trent Dougherty), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 78, No. 1: 123-132. _____ Forthcoming. "Clarity About Concessive Knowledge Attributions: Reply to Dodd" (with Trent Dougherty, Baylor University), Synthese. _____ Forthcoming: "Relativism and Contextualism," A Companion to Relativism, edited by Steven D. Hales (Blackwell). _____ Forthcoming: "Making it Evident: Evidence and Evidentness, Justification and Belief," Evidentialism and its Discontents, edited by Trent Dougherty (Oxford). _____ Forthcoming: "Contextualism," The Routledge Companion to Epistemology, edited by Sven Bernecker and Duncan Pritchard (Routledge). Sainsbury, R. M. 1997. Easy Possibilities, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 57: 907-19. Salmon, Nathan. 1987. How to Measure the Standard Metre, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 88: 193-217. Santas, Gerasimos. 2001. Goodness and Justice: Plato, Aristotle, and the Moderns. Maiden, MA: Blackwell Publishers. Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1993. Being and Nothingness. New York: Washington Square Press. Sartwell, Crispin. 1991. Knowledge is Merely True Belief, American Philosophical Quarterly 28: 157-65. _____ 1992. Why Knowledge Is Merely True Belief, Journal of Philosophy 89: 167-80.

Schaffer, Jonathan 2004. From Contextualism to Contrastivism, Philosophical Studies 119: 73-103. _____ 2005. Contrastive Knowledge, Oxford Studies in Epistemology I: 235-71. Schiffer, Stephen 1979. Naming and Knowing, Midwest Studies us Philosophy 2: 28-41. _____ 1995. Descriptions, Indexicals, and Belief Reports: Some Dilemmas (But Not the Ones You Expect, Mind 104: 107-31. _____ 1996. Contextualist Solutions to Scepticism, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96: 317-33. Schaffer, Jonathan. 2006. The Irrelevance of the Subject: Against Subject-Sensitive Invariantism. Philosophical Studies 127: 87-107. Schiffer, Stephen. 1996. Contextualist Solutions to Skepticism, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 96: 3I7-3. Schroeder, Mark. 2007. The Humean Theory of Reasons. Oxford Studies in Metaethics 2: 195-219. _____ 2008. Having Reasons. Philosophical Studies 139: 57-71. Schaffer, Jonathan. 2004. Skepticism, Contextualism and Discrimination, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Sellars, Wilfrid. 1970. On Knowing the Better and Doing the Worst. International Philosophical Quarterly 10: 5-20. Sidgwick, Henry. 1884. The Methods of Ethics. London: Macmillan. Skyrms, Brian. 1999. Choice and Chance, 4th edn. Belmar, MA: Wordsworth. Slote, Michael. 1979. Assertion and Belief, in J. Dancy (ed.), Papers on Language and Logic, Keele: Keele University Library. Slovic, Paul, Fischhoff, Baruch, and Lichtenstein, Sarah. 1982. Fact Versus Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk, in D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky (eds.), Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Snowdon, Paul. 1980/1. Perception, Vision, and Causation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 81: 175-92. Sorensen, Roy. 1988. Dogmatism, Junk Knowledge, and Conditionals. The Philosophical Quarterly 38: 433-54. Soames, Scott. 1999. Understanding Truth (Oxford: Oxford University Press). _____ 2002. Beyond Rigidity (Oxford: Oxford UP).

Sosa, Ernest. 1991. Knowledge in Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. _____ 2000. Skepticism and Contextualism, Philosophical Issues, 10: 1-18. _____ 2007. A Virtue Epistemology: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press. _____ forthcoming. Dubious Assertions, Philosophical Studies. Stainton, Robert (forthcoming). Contextualism in Epistemology and the Context Sensitivity of Knows. In J. C. Campbell, M. ORourke, and H. Silverstein (eds.) Knowledge and Skepticism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Stalnaker, Robert. 1975. Indicative Conditionals, Philosophia 5: 269-86. _____ 1984. Inquiry. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, MIT Press. _____ 1999. Context and Content (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Stanley, Jason. 2000. Context and Logical Form, Linguistics and Philosophy, 23: 391434. _____ 2002. Making it Articulated, Mind and Language, 17: 149-6. _____ 2002. Modality and What is Said, Philosophical Perspectives 16: 321-44. _____ 2002. Nominal Restriction, in G. Peters and G. Preyer (eds.), Logical Form and Language (Oxford: Oxford University Press). _____ 2004. On the Linguistic Basis for Contextualism, Philosophical Studies 119: 119-46. _____ 2005. Fallibilism and Concessive Knowledge Attributions. Analsis 65: 126-31. _____ 2005. Knowledge and Practical Interests, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Stine, Gail. 1976. Skepticism, Relevant Alternatives, and Deductive Closure, Philosophical Studies 29: 249-61. Stone, Jim. 2007. Contextualism and Warranted Assertion, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88: 92-113. Stroud, Barry. 1984. The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Swain, Marshall. 1970. The Consistency of Rational Belief, in M. Swain (ed.), Induction, Acceptance, and Rational Belief (Dordrecht: Reidel). Teller, Paul. 1967. Possibility, Philosophical Review, 76: I43-68.

_____ 1972. Epistemic Possibility, Philosophia, 2: 303-10. _____ 1975. All Kinds of Possibility, Philosophical Review, 84: 321-37. Unger, Peter. 1975. Ignorance: A Case for Scepticism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. _____ 1984. Philosophical Relativity, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. _____ 1986. The Cone Model of Knowledge, Philosophical Topics 14: 125-78. _____ 1995. Contextual Analysis in Ethics, Philosophy and PhenomenologicaI Research 55: 1-26. Van Fraassen, Bas. 1997. Belief and the Problem of Ulysses and the Sirens, Philosophical Studies, 77: 7-37. Viastos, Gregory. 1985. Socrates Disavowal of Knowledge, Philosophical Quarterly 35: 1-31. Vogel, Jonathan. 1987. Tracking, Closure, and Inductive Knowledge, in S. Luper-Foy (ed.), The Possibility of Knowledge: Nozick and his Critics (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield). _____ 1990. Are there Counterexamples to the Closure Principle?, in M. Roth and G. Ross (eds.), Doubting: Contemporary Perspectives on Skepticism (Dordrecht: Kluwer). _____ 1993. Dismissing Skeptical Possibilities, Philosophical Studies, 70: 235-50. _____ 1999. The New Relevant Alternatives Theory, Philosophical Perspectives, 13: 155-80. _____ 2000. Reliabilism Leveled, Journal of Philosophy, 97: 602-23. Weatherson, Brian. 2005. Can we do Without Pragmatic Encroachment? Philosophical Perspectives, 19(1): 417443. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10. 1111/j.1520-8583.2005.00068.x. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j. 1520-8583.2005.00068.x. Weiner, Matthew. 2005. Must We Know V/hat We Say?, Philosophical Review 114: 227-51. White, Alan. 1975. Modal Thinking, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Williams, Michael. 1978. Inference, justification and the Analysis of Knowledge, journal of Philosophy, 75: 249-63. Williamson, Timothy. 1996. Knowing and Asserting, Philosophical Review 105: 489-523. _____ 2000. Knowledge and its Limits, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

_____ 2001. Comments on Michael Williams Contextualism, Externalism and Epistemic Standards, Philosophical Studies, 103: 25-33. _____ 1994. Vagueness. London: Routledge. _____ 2005. Knowledge and Scepticism, in F. Jackson and M. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. _____ 2005. Contextualism Subjec-Sensitive Invariantism, and Knowledge of Knowledge, Philosophical Quarterly 55: 213-35. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1969. On Certainty (Oxford: Blackwell). Wright, Crispin. 1991. Skepticism and Dreaming: Imploding the Demon, Mind, 100: 87-116. Yourgrau, Palle. 1983. Knowledge and Relevant Alternatives, Synthese 55: 175-90. Zwicky, A., and Sadock, J. 1975. Ambiguity Tests and How to Fail Them, in J. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. iv (New York: Academic Press).