Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Test 2
Test 2
P
=
1
n
2
+ 2
j
1
n
1
n
, i < j, n = 1, 2, . . .
=
_
1
n
2
+ 2
1
n
2
n(n 1)
2
2
=
_
1
n
2
+
_
1
1
n
_
(1)
Hence, the standard deviation of a portfolio with n = 25 stocks is:
P
=
_
1
25
60
2
+
24
25
60
2
0.5
= 43.27%
(b) Because the stocks are identical, ecient portfolios are equally weighted. To obtain a
standard deviation of 43%, we need to solve for n:
43
2
=
60
2
n
+ 0.5
60
2
(n 1)
n
n = 36.73
Thus we need 37 stocks and will come in with volatility slightly under the target.
Sam
SJES3467 Investment and Financial Analysis I Dec, 2011
(c) As n gets very large, the variance of an ecient (equally weighted) portfolio diminishes,
leaving only the variance that comes from the covariances among stocks, that is from
equation (1)
lim
n
P
=
_
2
=
_
0.5 60
2
= 42.43%
Note that with 25 stocks we came within 0.84% of the systematic risk, that is, the nonsys-
tematic risk of a portfolio of 25 stocks is only 0.84%. With 37 stocks the standard deviation
is 43%, of which nonsystematic risk is 0.57%.
(d) If the risk-free is 10%, then the risk premium on any size portfolio is 15 -10 = 5%. The
standard deviation of a well-diversied portfolio is (practically) 42.43%; hence the slope of
the CAL is
S = 5/42.43 = 0.1178.
Sam Page 2 of 5
SJES3467 Investment and Financial Analysis I Dec, 2011
2. Your client has a $900,000 fully diversied portfolio. She is contemplating investing in ABC Company
common stock an unspecied amount $X. You have the following information:
P
=
_
w
2
ABC
2
ABC
+w
2
OP
2
OP
+ 2 w
ABC
w
OP
Cov(r
ABC
, r
OP
)
=
_
_
X
W
0
+X
_
2
2.95
2
+
_
W
0
W
0
+X
_
2
2.37
2
+ 2
_
X
W
0
+X
__
W
0
W
0
+X
_
2.80
_1
2
=
1
(W
0
+X)
2
_
2.95
2
X
2
+ 2.37
2
W
2
0
+ 2 2.80W
0
X
_
(b) We determine the X for which:
i. the portfolio has minimum variance as follows:
d
2
dX
=
1
(W
0
+X)
2
2
_
2.95
2
X + 2.80W
0
_
2
(W
0
+X)
3
_
2.95
2
X
2
+ 2.37
2
W
2
0
+ 2 2.80W
0
X
_
Hence,
d
2
dX
=
_
2.95
2
X + 2.80W
0
_
(W
0
+X)
_
2.95
2
X
2
+ 2.37
2
W
2
0
+ 2 2.80W
0
X
_
= 0
=
_
2.95
2
2.80
_
W
0
X
_
2.37
2
2.80
_
W
2
0
= 0
i.e., X =
_
2.37
2
2.80
_
W
0
_
2.95
2
2.80
_ = 0.4772W
0
ii. the portfolio is optimal if:
w
ABC
=
E(R
ABC
)
2
OP
E(R
OP
)Cov(r
ABC
, r
OP
)
E(R
ABC
)
2
OP
+E(R
OP
)
2
ABC
[E(R
ABC
) +E(R
OP
)]Cov(r
ABC
, r
OP
)
w
OP
= 1 w
ABC
(2)
where
E(R
ABC
) = E(r
ABC
) r
f
E(R
OP
) = E(r
OP
) r
f
with r
f
= 0.42 as given in this case and from which X is obtained as
X =
1 w
OP
w
OP
W
0
We form a new portfolio including the T-bill with ABC and the Original Portfolio, OP with
the following weights:
w
Tbill
, (1 w
Tbill
)w
OP
, (1 w
Tbill
)w
ABC
(3)
where w
OP
and w
ABC
are determined using equation (2).
The optimal risky portfolio provides an expected return of E[r
RP
]:
E[r
RP
] = w
OP
0.67 +w
ABC
1.25
Sam Page 4 of 5
SJES3467 Investment and Financial Analysis I Dec, 2011
We have to determine w
Tbill
such that
w
Tbill
0.42 + (1 w
Tbill
) E[r
RP
] = 1.10 0.67 (4)
Using equation (4) the various weights listed in (3) can be calculated to enable the con-
struction of the desired portfolio.
(c) (d) As the original portfolio is said to be fully diversied, the addition of any further assets to
her existing portfolio will have no impact on the systematic risk exposures.
Sam Page 5 of 5