Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LaserAnemometerMeasur Trans On Axial Flow Fan Rotor 67 NASA TP2879
LaserAnemometerMeasur Trans On Axial Flow Fan Rotor 67 NASA TP2879
NASA
Technical
Paper /-..
2879
November 1989
Laser Anemometer
Measurements in a
Transonic Axial-Flow
Fan Rotor
Anthony J. Strazisar,
Jerry R. Wood,
Michael D. Hathaway,
and Kenneth L. Suder
NASA
(_!A_A-I _-?,-'37 P) LAbC K A_, ,.-_, T :.
MFA'3!jR_Mc_'[_ I_'w A TPAN-_'Ti',IC A_I'%L-FLLJW FAP':
RnTrK (NASA) 21_ _ C":,CL ?_)q
Uncl as
_L/J4 01873S3
NASA
Technical
Paper
2879
1989
Laser Anemometer
Measurements in a
Transonic Axial-Flow
Fan Rotor
Anthony J. Strazisar,
Jerry R. Wood,
Michael D. Hathaway,
and Kenneth L. Suder
Lewis Research Center
Cleveland, Ohio
included, andtheeffectwasfoundtobeminimal.However, 33.25 kg/sec. The design rotational speed is 16 043 rpm,
thiseffectshouldbechecked foreachindividual code. which yields a tip speed of 429 m/sec and an inlet tip relative
Theresults reported hereinareonlysuitable forcomparison Mach number of 1.38. The rotor has 22 blades and an aspect
to resultsfromthree-dimensional codeswhichhavesome ratio of 1.56 (based on average span/root axial chord). The
viscous losses included. Thedatacouldalsobecompared to rotor solidity varies from 3.11 at the hub to 1.29 at the tip.
resultsfromanS1-$2calculation procedure if an$2code The inlet and exit tip diameters are 51.4 and 48.5 cm,
capable of givingreasonable streamsheet thickness distribu- respectively, and the inlet and exit hub/tip radius ratios are
0.375 and 0.478, respectively. A fillet radius of 1.78 mm is
tionsthroughtherotoris used.
used at the airfoil-hub juncture. The square root of the mean
Thisreportpresents adetaileddescription ofthebladeand
flowpath geometry, presents thedata,anddiscusses measure- square of the airfoil surface finish is 0.8 /_m or better, the
airfoil surface tolerance is ±0.04 ram, and the running tip
mentuncertainty. Noattempt is made tocompare thedatato
computational resultsortousethedatatostudydetailed flow clearance is approximately 1.0 mm.
Two features of the rotor blading which can be seen in
physics. Comparisons between thedataandDenton's three-
dimensional Eulercodecanbefoundin references 7and8. figure 2 are a strain gauge mounted on the suction surface of
Flowphysical detailswhichhave beenstudied usingthese data one blade and a nick in the leading edge of another blade. The
include(1) flowfieldvariations frompassage to passage, leading edge nick occurred after the laser anemometer flow-
passage shockstructure,strength,and steadiness, and field measurements were completed. The blade with the strain
(2)vortexshedding fromthebladetrailingedge.Discussions gauge was included in the blades surveyed with the laser
of theseflowfeatures canbefoundin references 8 to 10. anemometer. The impact of the strain gauge on the flowfield
is discussed in reference 9. The impact on the results presented
in this report is considered to be minimal because the blade
with the strain gauge affects only 1 of the 17 blade passages
Apparatus surveyed with the laser anemometer and the results reported
here are averaged across all 17 blade passages.
Axial Compressor Facility Blade coordinates at the design speed operating condition
A schematic diagram of the NASA Lewis single-stage axial- are given in table I for surfaces of revolution for 14 blade
sections. The nomenclature used in table I is shown in figure 4.
flow compressor test facility is shown in figure 1. The drive
system consists of a 3000-hp electric motor with a variable- The origin of all blade geometry Z-coordinates is the inter-
section of the blade leading edge with the hub. The blade
frequency power supply. Motor speed is controllable from 400
surface coordinates are given at 35 points for each blade
to 3600 rpm. The motor is coupled to a 5.25 gear ratio speed
section. These coordinates describe a blunt-edge blade with
increaser gear box that in turn drives the rotor. The facility
is sized for a maximum airflow of 45 kg/sec with atmospheric the Z-coordinates for points 1 and 35 corresponding to the
minimum and maximum axial extents of the blade leading and
air as the working fluid.
Air is drawn into the facility from an inlet located on the trailing edge circles. Coordinates which describe the blade
roof of the building. The air first passes through a filter to leading and trailing edge circles precede the blade surface
coordinates for each blade section. The blade edge circles fit
removed large particles. It then passes through a flow measuring
into the blade surfaces in a meridional (along an R,Z-line) and
station consisting of a thin-plate orifice, through inlet butterfly
valves, and into a plenum chamber. The air is not dried before radius x angular coordinate system. The blade edge circles are
tangent to both blade surfaces and to the Z-coordinate of points
entering the plenum. The air is accelerated into the compressor
1 and 35 listed in the blade surface table.
test section through a nozzle, passes through the test rotor,
Thebladesections
runfromthehuboftherotortotheshroud. similar results. Therefore, although the seed particles are
Bladesection14liesoutsidethephysicalbladetip. The actually of the order of 0.5 izm in diameter, only particles
R,Z-Iocation of the actual tip of the blade under design speed which are of the order of 1.0 to 1.4 #m in diameter scatter
operating conditions can be obtained by subtracting 1.0 mm
enough light to be detected by the laser anemometer optical
from blade section 14 in a direction which is normal to the system.
annulus shroud contour.
The rotor geometry under design speed operating conditions
is normally determined by applying deflections calculated by
the NASTRAN finite-element computer code to the blade Test Procedure
manufacturing coordinates. However, in the present work the
actual blade tip geometry was measured at design speed with Aerodynamic Performance Measurements
the laser anemometer by focussing the LA probe volume on
The plenum total temperature is measured by two
the blade tip. During the analysis of these blade tip position thermocouples located in the plenum. The rotor mass flow is
data it became apparent that the actual blade untwist was
determined from the measured pressure differential across the
slightly less than that predicted by the NASTRAN code. The
calibrated orifice plate. Radial surveys of total and static
NASTRAN-derived geometry was therefore corrected to yield
pressure, total temperature, and flow angle are made at survey
a best match with the laser measurements at the blade tip. This stations 1 and 2 located upstream and downstream of the rotor
correction amounts to a 1.4 ° restagger toward the closed
as shown in figure 5. The total pressure, total temperature,
position at the planar manufacturing section located 25.4 cm
and flow angle are measured by a single self-nulling
along the stacking axis from the rotor centerline. This
combination (cobra + thermocouple) probe, while the static
correction is faired to 0 ° at the planar manufacturing section
pressure is measured by a single self-nulling 18 ° wedge-angle
located 20.32 cm along the stacking axis from the rotor center-
probe. Drawings of the combination and wedge-angle probe
line, which is the location where the NASTRAN-predicted are shown in figure 6. At stations 1 and 2 measurements were
deflections begin to deviate from a simple beam deflection acquired at nine radial locations across the annulus. Additional
analysis. The blade geometry listed in table I has resulted from
measurements were made in the endwall regions at station 1
this process and is considered to be an accurate representation
to obtain good resolution of the annulus wall boundary layers.
of the actual blade geometry under design speed operating Inner- and outer-wall static pressures are also measured at
conditions.
stations 1 and 2.
Annulus.--The nomenclature used to define the hub and
The overall pressure ratio and efficiency are calculated based
shroud contours is also shown in figure 4. The hub and shroud
on appropriate averages of the radial distributions of total
contours are given in table II. The origin of the Z-coordinate
pressure and total temperature measured at survey stations 1
corresponds to the origin of the Z-coordinate used to define
and 2. Details of the averaging procedures used are given in
the blade geometry--i.e., Z = 0 corresponds to the intersection the subsequent Calculation Procedures section.
of the blade leading edge with the hub flowpath.
form a contiguous segment on the rotor, which has a total of per blade passage, this yields approximately 70 measurements
in each measurement window for each fringe orientation if
22 blades. In other words, we do not measure a few blade
the measurements are evenly distributed. As will be discussed
passages, skip one passage, and then measure more blade
in the Calculation Procedures section, all measurements
passages.
which occur within a given measurement window are averaged
At a given axial and radial location the first measurement
window in which data are recorded WNBEG is chosen such together to obtain a mean velocity which is assigned to the
that the window lies on the suction surface of a blade. The center of the window.
FIowfield surveys are performed by collecting data at
value of WNBEG is a function of the axial and radial location
of the measurement line. The variation of WNBEG with axial varying AP,RP locations. LA measurements are acquired along
conical measurement surfaces which approximate the location
location is shown schematically in figure 9. For clarity, only
of the rotor design streamsurfaces. The radial coordinates of
15 measurement windows are shown from blade to blade in
the design streamlines are known at stations 1 and 2 (which
this figure. As shown in figure 9, WNBEG is chosen so as
are the locations of conventional pressure and temperature
to lie on a straight-line extension of the blade mean camber
surveys), at the rotor blade leading and trailing edges, and
line upstream and downstream of the blade. In practice, the
at the stator leading edge location. The measurement surfaces
blade geometry is used to calculate the value of WNBEG for
are created using straight-line interpolation between these
each axial and radial measurement location. Because of blade
untwist under varying speed and aerodynamic loading points as shown in figure 11. A meridional view of all the
measurement surfaces showing the axial, radial coordinates
conditions, the accuracy of the calculation of WNBEG is of
of the measurement points is shown in figure 5.
the order of one or two measurement windows.
The measurement windows in a blade passage are evenly
distributed along the blade pitch, not along the gap between Calculation Procedures
adjacent blade surfaces. In the blade-to-blade data plots
presented in this report, the first point (at the left edge of the Aerodynamic Performance Data
plot) is on the suction side of the blade passage. The blade
The values of total and static pressure and total temperature
appears near the right edge of the plot as a region of zero data
since no measurements are acquired when the blade is in a measured at survey stations 1 and 2 are first corrected for Math
number
andstreamline
slope.These
corrections
arebased
on Laser Anemometer Measurements
a calibration of each probe used and on the design streamline
slope. All measurements are corrected to NACA standard-day The laser anemometer velocity measurements acquired along
sea-level conditions (temperature, 288.2 K; pressure, 101 325 a measurement line which passes through a given axial, radial
N/m 2) at the rotor inlet. The rotor overall performance is location can be represented by the following array:
based on orifice mass flow and the aerodynamic survey
measurements acquired at stations 1 and 2 upstream and
v(ij) i = 1,NM(j) j = I,NWN × NP (2)
downstream of the rotor, respectively. The orifice mass flow
is corrected to standard-day conditions at the rotor inlet. The
radial distributions of total temperature are mass averaged across where V(i,j) is the ith measurement in windowj and NM(j)
the annulus. The radial distributions of total pressure are energy the number of measurements acquired in windowj. The total
averaged by converting them to their enthalpy equivalents and number of measurement windows is NWN x NP, where NWN
then mass averaging them across the annulus. The formulas is the number of measurement windows across one rotor pitch,
used are and NP the number of rotor blade passages which are surveyed.
As mentioned previously, all of the data reported herein were
acquired with NWN = 50, NP = 17.
m
_1"_ - I
The velocities are corrected to standard day conditions using
the relation
NR
_(j) _ 1 NM(j)
j = I,NWN x NP (4)
NM(j) i_l
= V(i,j)
"flAP =
-- -- |
j = 1,NWN x NP (5)
Subscript i refers to the ith radial measurement location,
subscript j to the station number, AA,,, is the incremental
annulus area, and NR the number of survey locations across where V(j) is the circumferential distribution of the ensemble-
the annulus. Standard practice is to use nine survey locations averaged velocity component in the fringe normal direction
from tip to hub. In the present investigation, additional survey across each of the NP blade passages which were surveyed.
locations were used at station 1 at the peak efficiency and near The ensemble averaging period is one rotor revolution.
stall operating conditions to obtain increased resolution of the As mentioned in the previous Test Procedure section,
inlet boundary layers for use in comparing measured measurements acquired at two different fringe orientations are
performance to that predicted by numerical analysis codes. required to calculate the axial and tangential components of
These additional stations were not included in the overall velocity. This calculation is performed as the simultaneous
performance results because they were not used for all rotor solution of the following two equations for the two unknowns
operating conditions. V. and Vo:
The local speed of sound in each window in the averaged
_oL (j) = Vz(j) cos ZOl + Vo(j) sin ZO1 blade passage is calculated as follows:
j = 1,NWN x NP (6)
NP
= 1 Results and Discussion
_(k) NP-NZ .E Vz[k+(j-1)NWN]
./=1
(8) Aerodynamic Performance Measurements
k = I,NWN
Aerodynamic performance data and laser anemometer
flowfield measurements are presented for two design-speed
NP operating conditions--one near peak efficiency and one near
stall. The location of these two points on the rotor design speed
_o(k) = NP -1 NZ _1
j= V0 [k + (j - 1)NWN]
operating line is shown in figure 12 along with additional
k = I,NWN (9) aerodynamic performance measurements which are not
reported in detail here. The data shown in figure 12 are based
on orifice mass flow and the aerodynamic survey measure-
where NZ is the number of blade passages in which no ments acquired at survey stations 1 and 2 upstream and
measurementswere acquir=ed in window number k. downstream of the rotor.
Values of Vz(k) and Vo(k) are used to calculate the The aerodynamic radial survey results obtained at survey
passage-averaged relative flow angle as follows: stations 1 and 2 at the near peak efficiency and the near stall
conditions are presented in tables III(a) and (b). The overall
rotor aerodynamic performance based on the energy-averaged
k= 1,NWN (10) total pressure ratio and mass-averaged total temperature ratio
_REL(k) = ARCTAN[ _0(k)-Rw]
at station 2 is included in each table just ahead of the station 2
radial survey results.
where R is the radius and w the rotor rotational speed in radians The station 1 survey data from tables IIl(a) and (b) are
plotted in figures 13 and 14 in the form of the total velocity
per second.
distribution normalized withrespect tothecriticalvelocityat Measurements madewitha hot-wireanemometer 8 cm
standard-day conditions. Thestaticpressure gradientnearthe upstream oftherotorhubleading edgeplaneindicate a free-
casingwallforthepeakefficiency condition doesnotmatch stream turbulence levelof about1.5percent.
wellwiththemeasured wallstaticpressure. Sincethenear
wallpressure measurements weremade withastandard aero- Laser Anemometer Measurements
dynamic probe, it ispossible thattheprobe access holeorprobe
stemaffected themeasurements nearthecasing. Tocheck this Two features of the velocity measurements should be kept
effect,thestaticpressure distribution from64-percent span in mind when interpreting the LA data. First, the average of
fromthehubto thecasingwaschanged to givea linear all velocity measurements which occur in a given window is
distributiontothemeasured valueofthecasing static
pressure. often considered as a single velocity measured at a point
Themodifiedvelocitydistribution whichresultsfromthis located at the center of the measurement window. It is
process isplotted alongwiththemeasured velocity distribution important to remember that the measurements do not actually
in figure13.Themassflowcorresponding toeachvelocity occur at a single point but rather occur in a region centered
distribution wascalculated usingacubicspline.Themeasured around the plotted point. Second, although each individual
pressure distribution yieldsa massflow of 34.62kg/sec velocity measurement provides an instantaneous measurement
(76.32 lbm/sec), whilethemodified distribution yieldsamass of the unsteady velocity field, the measurements acquired in
flowof34.78 kg/sec (76.66 lbm/sec). Thisdifference iswithin each measurement window are acquired over thousands of
themeasurement accuracy of theorifice. separate rotor revolutions. The average of all velocity
Alsoshown infigures13and14isthevelocitydistribution measurements acquired in a given window is therefore the
obtained fromaradialsurveyperformed atstation1withthe ensemble average (with the averaging period being one rotor
laser anemometer. Agreement between thevelocities calculated revolution) velocity at the window location.
fromthe surveyprobepressure measurements andthose The location of each laser anemometer measurement is listed
measured withthelaseranemometer iswithin8percent atall in table VI. The absolute angular location of the first
spanwise locations. Thislevelofagreement isconsidered to measurement window is given by the parameter WNBEG.
bereasonable forseveral reasons. First,theflowfield atstation1 Since the rotor has 22 blades and there are 50 measurement
isaffected bythepotential flowwhichpropagates upstream of windows across each blade passage, there are a total of 1100
therotor,particularly nearthehub.Theabsolute velocityand measurement windows around the rotor wheel. The absolute
flowangletherefore varyslightlyacross thebladepitch.The angular location which corresponds to a given value of
range between themaximum andminimum velocitymeasured WNBEG can therefore be obtained from
across thebladepitchisshownbytheflagsin figures13and
14.Second, although thelaseranemometer system measures 2rWNBEG
thepitchwise distribution ofvelocity atstation 1,thepitchwise 0(radians) -
1100
density distribution isnotknown. Therefore theLAdatacannot
bemassaveraged. TheLA datashownin figures13and14
werearithmetically averaged across thebladepitch.Finally, The origin of the AP-coordinate shown in figure 5 (which
theaerodynamic surveyprobesrespond to thepitchwise defines the laser anemometer measurement axial location as well
varyingvelocity andpressure fieldinsome unknown manner. as the axial location of aerodynamic survey stations 1 and 2)
The time-averaged probemeasurements are thenmass is different from the origin of the Z-coordinate shown in figure 4
averaged toyieldtheresultsshownin figures13and14. (which defines the blade sections and the annulus geometry).
Theintegrated massflowatstations 1and2wascalculated The conversion factor between the two Z-coordinates is given by
fromthesurvey datalistedin tables Ill(a) and(b)usingthe
measurement radiiandannular areaelements listedintableIV. APta ...... d ..... data = Zmad,, -- 2. 159 cm
Theresults arepresented intableV.Notethatwhencalculating
themassflowfromanintegration of theradialdistribution of The absolute axial locations listed in table VI are dependent
flowparameters across theannulus, theresultisdependent on on the rotor axial deflection, which varies with operating
thenumber ofannular elements usedintheintegration andon condition from day to day. The axial locations listed in table VI
thelocation oftheelement centers. Therefore, whencomparing for 0- and 100-percent chord may therefore not agree with
mass- andenergy-averaged conditions predicted bycomputa- those listed in the blade geometry data in table I. Consequently,
tionalresults to themeasured valuesshownin tableV, one when comparing laser anemometer measurements to computed
should takecaretousecomputed conditions attheradiishown results, one should use the percent chord locations listed in
in tableIV andto usetheannularareaelements shownin table VI as a method of placing the axial measurement location
tableIV toobtainaccurate comparisons. relative to the blade.
The radial measurement locations listed in table VI in terms The streamwise and blade-to-blade plots of relative Mach
of percent span from the tip (i.e., 10- through 90-percent span) number and relative flow angle are presented in the following
surface of the adjacent blade. speed. The orifice mass flow is maintained constant to within
Figure 16 illustrates the constant chord lines along which 0.14 kg/sec.
the LA data are presented in the form of blade-to-blade plots Aerodynamic probe measurements.--The aerodynamic
for each immersion. At 10-, 30-, and 70-percent span, blade- survey probes were calibrated before starting the test program.
to-blade plots of the data are presented for each chordwise Pressure probes are calibrated for streamline pitch angle
measurement location. To limit the number of plots in this sensitivity. Temperature probes are calibrated to determine
report, blade-to-blade plots at the remaining immersions are recovery factors for the Mach number range encountered
presented at only six chordwise locations upstream and during testing. The estimated uncertainties in the individual
downstream of the blade. These chordwise locations were aerodynamic survey measurements are as follows:
chosen because the Mach number and flow angle distributions
at these locations define the bow wave system and the blade Flow angle, deg .................................................. 1
wake. The blade-to-blade distributions of Mach number and Temperature, K ................................................ 0.6
flow angle within the blade at immersions other than 10-, 30-, Total pressure at station 1, N/cm 2 ......................... 0.1
and 70-percent span can be determined at nine points across Static pressure at station 1, N/cm 2 ......................... 0.4
the blade pitch from the nine streamwise plots presented herein Total pressure at station 2, N/cm 2 ........................ 0.10
for each immersion or can be obtained from the complete LA Static pressures at station 2, N/cm 2 ...................... 0.07
are shown in figure 17 for both the near peak efficiency and pressure probe were located at a single circumferential
the near stall operating conditions. These contour plots are location. Therefore, any effects due to asymmetries in the
from reference 7. They were generated from the data by flowfield are not included in the measurements reported here.
applying data enhancement procedures such as smoothing and Second, only nine radial survey locations were used at the rotor
interpolation in the direction of the steepest Mach number exit (survey station 2); this introduces uncertainty in the
gradient. These procedures, which are fully described in spanwise-averaged quantities at station 2 because of a lack of
reference 7, do not affect the overall characteristics of the resolution within the endwall boundary layers.
contour plots. The contour plots formed from the data without Laser anemometer measurements.--The estimated uncer-
using enhancement procedures are compared to the enhanced tainty for the laser anemometer data is nominally 1.0 percent
contour plots in reference 7. on velocity and 1° on flow angle. This uncertainty is dependent
on many factors, including local turbulence intensity, through- The magnitude of the uncertainty in Mach number and flow
flow unsteadiness, velocity bias errors, and rotor speed drift angle is indicated by the uncertaino, interval drawn on each
during each individual rotor revolution. Uncertainties due to data point in figures 18 to 51. These uncertainty intervals
rotor speed drift are minimized by not recording measurements indicate a 95-percent confidence level that the true mean lies
from rotor revolutions during which the rotor speed drifted within the uncertainty interval.
by more than 0.4 percent. The measurement uncertainty is
higher in regions of high-velocity gradients which occur across
Summary of Results
the rotor passage shock and across the blades wakes. In these
regions the accuracy of the laser anemometer measurements A laser anemometer has been used to provide detailed
is controlled by the ability of the seed particles to follow the flowfield surveys within a low-aspect-ratio axial-flow transonic
flow. A more complete discussion of measurement uncer- fan rotor operating in a rotor-only configuration. Both laser
tainties and seed particle tracking error across a typical anemometer and aerodynamic performance data were acquired
transonic rotor passage shock can be found in reference 15. at operating conditions near peak efficiency and near stall.
The statistical uncertainty in the relative Mach number and Flowpath coordinates and detailed blade geometry are
flow angle is estimated by first determining the statistical presented in tabular form. The aerodynamic performance is
uncertainty in _ and _ in each individual measurement presented in tabular form as well as in plots of the radial
window using equation (5). These statistical uncertainties are distribution of velocity upstream of the rotor. The laser
then combined by applying propagation of uncertainty methods anemometer data are presented in the form of pitchwise and
(ref. 16) to equations (6) to (9) to determine the uncertainty in streamwise plots of the distribution of relative Mach number
_, and Vo. Finally, the uncertainty in Mach number and flow and relative flow angle on blade-to-blade streamsurfaces
angle is determined by applying propagation of uncertainty located at nine equally spaced spanwise locations from hub
methods to equations (10) and (11). to tip.
Appendix AmSymbols
A Aon incremental annulus area (eq. (1)) TNPC blade thickness normal to the mean camber line,
10
Appendix B--Description of Data Available on Magnetic Media
_rl > o
/
/ 8
O'_ Z
"-_"'_LASER
"_OPTICAL AXIS
/ / AXIS OF ROTATION
y RP 2pO 0
12
RADIAL POSITION NO. MEAS.
Absolute radial location of the LA measurements. The Total number of measurements acquired in the measurement
percent span value is based on the radial location of the window number across the NP measured blade passages.
measurement RP and the flowpath hub and tip radius at the This number is the average of the number of measurements
axial location of the measurement AP. acquired in each of the two laser anemometer runs which
comprise the scan.
CIRCUMFERENTIAL POSITION
Absolute circumferential location of the LA measurements. AVG PASS VEL
Spatially ensemble-averaged axial and tangential velocity
BEAM DEFLECTION
components (in m/sec) as calculated by equations (8) and
Off-radial measurement angle RTas defined previously for
(9). A VZ corresponds to _:, and A VT corresponds to _0-
the background information file.
UNCERTAINTY OF AVG
CORR SPEED
Uncertainty intervals for the velocity components (m/sec).
Rotor rotational speed, corrected to standard day conditions.
UFZ and UNTare the uncertainty intervals for the axial and
PRESSURE RATIO, CORR MASS FLOW, TOTAL tangential velocity components, respectively. The odds are
TEMPERATAURE 20:1 that the true mean velocity components _: and _0 lie
These variables are identical to those defined previously for in the intervals AVZ- UVZ< _.<AVZ+ UVZ and
the background information file. AVT- UNT < _o < AVT + UNT.
13
The laser anemometer system used in the present investi-
AVZ
v0 gation is a single-channel system and therefore measures
only the component of unresolved unsteadiness which is in
the fringe orientation direction. Measurements acquired with
a single-channel LA system cannot be used to calculate
values of the unresolved unsteadiness in the axial and
tangential directions unless the measurements are acquired
with the fringes oriented in the axial and tangential
directions, which was not done in the present work. It is,
LA I however, possible to calculate upper and lower bounds for
MEASUREMENT I the unsteadiness components using measurements acquired
at arbitrary fringe orientations.
V_/..B DIRECTION 24
As shown in figure B-2, measurements acquired in
"_MAX[MUM ENVELOPE OF
ABSOLUTE VELOCIIY measurement directions 1 and 2 at a given axial and radial
FLUCIUAT IONS location enable the calculation of _o,, VI, _o2, and V2 in
the directions 1 and 2, respectively. V_ and V_ represent
one standard deviation of the velocity from _0_ and V:02.
The parallelogram ABCD can be defined in figure B-2 by
LA
MEASUREMENT projecting the range of possible velocities defined by Vi
DIRECTION I and V_ perpendicular to the 1 and 2 directions. This paral-
Figure B-2.--Schematic representation of_)undson unresolved unsteadiness. lelogram defines the locii of all possible velocity fluctuations
which are one standard deviation from the mean absolute
velocity V. The extremes of this parallelogram in the Z- and
0-directions define the bounds AVZ' and Air/" included in
each scan data file.
14
I
U
0 _DO
!
_0 ......°.. .... ....0.....°
_HH
_o_m
_OOH
D Q 0
L_
o
z H _ZO
© IIII
i_
Z
_oo_oo_oo____ _ _
Z 0 0.,,,,,° ...... °°,,.°..°°
0 u
LL
z
O_D I:1
© m H_O_ .... °...°°.°.°..00......
h_O
.1 U H_O_
O"
_0
_0=_
_u_
II
0
_0_
.°°°.°.,° ........ .,,,,°.
< oooooooooooooooooooooooo
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
tel
DDH
....,0.,.0,..,,,,.......
_0_
_U
.... ., ..... ,,.°°,, ..... .
IIIIIIIII
_H_
0 ...... ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ...... ° ....
_O_D
U
_111111 _
III
U- U
u_
15
_m
_0_0
_.
_0
_m
_0
_ ........... o ............................... RTTTRRR
_ ..... _&&3 .................................
v v
<
t9
<
_ o_o_
< -
_ ......................
_n o _n r- ,-_ ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo°°°°°°°°°°°° o ...... _,_
o_
o
o _n
........................ ....
m_m
]6
References
1. Dunker, R.J.; Strinning, P.E.; and Weyer, H.B.: Experimental Study Supersonic Phenomena in Turbomachines, AGARD CP-401, AGARD,
of the Flow Field Within a Transonic Axial Compressor Rotor by Laser Neuilly-Sur-Seine, France, 1986, pp. 2-1 to 2-14.
Velocimetry and Comparison with Through-flow Calculations. J. Eng. 9. Strazisar, A.J.: Investigation of Flow Phenomena in a Transonic Fan
Power, vol. 100, no. 2, Apr. 1978, pp. 279-286. Rotor Using Laser Anemometery. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, vol.
2. Chima, R.V.; and Strazisar, A.J.: Comparison of Two- and Three- 107, no. 2, Apr. 1985, pp. 427-435.
Dimensional Flow Computations with Laser Anemometer Measurements
10. Hathaway, M.D.; Gertz, J.B.; Epstein, A.H; and Strazisar, A.J.: Rotor
in a Transonic Compressor Rotor. J. Eng. Power, vol. 105, no. 3. July Wake Characteristics of a Transonic Axial-Flow Fan. AIAA J., vol.
1983, pp. 596-605.
24, no. 11, Nov. 1986, pp. 1802-1810.
3. Sarathy, K. P. :Computation of Three-Dimensional Flow Fields Through 11. Cunnan, W.S.; Stevens, W. ; and Urasek, D.C.: Design and Performance
Rotating Blade Rows and Comparison with Experiment. J. Eng. Power, of a 427-Meter-per-Second-Tip-Speed Two-Stage Fan Having a 2.40
w)l. 104, no. 2, Apr. 1982, pp. 394-402. Pressure Ratio. NASA TP-1314, 1978.
4. Singh, UK.: A Computation and Comparison with Measurements of 12. Urasek, D.C.: Gorrell, W.T.; and Cunnan, W.S. : Performance of Two-
Transonic Flow in an Axial Compressor Stage with Shock and Boundary Stage Fan Having Low-Aspect-Ratio, First-Stage Rotor Blading. NASA
Layer Interaction. J. Eng. Power, vol. 104, no. 2, Apr. 1982, TP-1493, 1979.
pp. 510-515.
13. Powell, J.A.; Strazisar, A.J.; and Seashohz, R.G.: High-Speed Laser
5. Goldman, L.J.; and Seasholtz, R.G.: Laser Anemometer Measurements
Anemometer System for lntra-Rotor Flow Mapping in Turbomachinery.
in an Annular Cascade of Core Turbine Vanes and Comparison with NASA TP-1663, 1982.
Theory. NASA TP-2018, 1982. 14. Powell, J.A.; Strazisar, A.J.; and Seasholtz, R.G.: Efficient Laser
6. Denton, J. D. : An Improved Time Marching Method for Turbomachinery Anemometer for Intra-Rotor Flow Mapping in Turbomachinery. J. Eng.
Calculation. ASME Paper 82-GT-239, Apr. 1982. Gas Turbines Power, vol. 103, no. 2, Apr. 1981. pp. 424-429.
7. Picrzga, M.J. ; and Wood, J.R.: Investigation of the Three-Dimensional 15. Strazisar, A.J.; and Powell, J.A. : Laser Anemometer Measurements in
Flow Field Within a Transonic Fan Rotor: Experiment and Analysis. a Transonic Axial Flow Compressor Rotor. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power,
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, vol. 107, no. 2, Apr. 1985, pp. 436-449. vol. 103, no. 2, Apr. 1981, pp. 430-437.
8. Wood, J.R.; Strazisar, A.J.; and Simonyi, P.S.: Shock Structure
16. Kline, S.J.: The Purpose of Uncertainty Analysis. J. Fluids Eng. vol.
Measured in a Transonic Fan Using Laser Anemometry. Transonic and 107, no. 2, June 1985, pp. 153-160.
17
TABLE I.--BLADE SURFACE COORDINATES ON SURFACES OF REVOLUTION
SYMBOLS
K LINE NUMBER
Z AXIAL COORDINATE (CENTIMETERS)
R RAD I AL COORD I NATES (CENT I METERS )
THSPI ANGULAR COORDINATE OF BLADE SUP.FACE i (RADIANS)
THSF2 ANGULAR COORDINATE OF BLADE SURFACE 2 (RADIANS)
TNPC THICKNESS NORMAL TO THE MEAN CAMBER LINE ON THE SURFACE (CENTIMETERS)
BETA ANGLE OF _ CAMBER LINE FROM THE MERIDIONAL DIRECTION (DEGREES)
BETA1 AN_'q.E OF BLADE SURFACE I FROM THE IIERIDIONAL DIRECTION (DEGREES)
BETA2 ANGLE OF BLADE SURFACE 2 FRON THE MERIDIONAL DIRECTION (DEGREES)
18
TABLE l.--Continued
19
TABLE l.--Conlinued.
2O
TABLE I.--Continued.
21
TABLE
I --Continued
22
TABLE I --Continued.
23
TABLE l.--Continucd.
24
TABLE
I.--Continued.
25
TABLE
l.--Continued.
26
TABLE I.--Continued.
27
TABLE
I.--Continued.
28
TABLE l.--Continued.
29
TABLE
l.--Continued
3O
TABLE
l.--Continued
3!
TABLE
l.--Concluded.
32
TABLE II.--INNER AND OUTER FLOWPATH COORDINATES
33
TABLE III.--AERODYNAMIC SURVEY DATA
T REF. = 288.15 K
P REF. = 101325 NT/METER SQUARED;
FLOH ANGLE IS FROM THE MERIDIONAL DIRECTION
RADIUS OF SHROUD 25.654 C_NTIMETERS
9.1465 CENTIMETERS
RADIUS OF HUB
-2.473 CENTIMETERS
AXIAL DISTANCE FROM ROTOR HUB LEADING EDGE
32.305 KG/SECOND
MASS FLOW RATE MEASURED WITH ORIFICE
0.8390 _ P REF.
STATIC PRESSURE ON THE SHROUD
0.8764 _ P REF.
STATIC PRESSURE ON THE HUB
24.4043 CENTIMETERS
RADIUS OF SHROUD
12.0167 CENTIMETERS
RADIUS OF HUB
II.011 CENTIMETERS
AXIAL DISTANCE FROM ROTOR HUB LEADING EDGE
ENERGY AVERAGED TOTAL PRESSURE RATIO ACROSS ROTOR 1.728
1.188
MASS AVERAGED TOTAL TEMPERATURE RATIO ACROSS ROTOR
0.901
ROTOR ADIABATIC EFFICIENCY
1.3630 _ P REF.
STATIC PRESSURE ON THE SHROUD
1.0336 _ P REF.
STATIC PRESSURE ON THE HUB
34
TABLE IIl.--Concluded.
P REF.
= 101525 NT/METER SQUARED; T REF. = 288.15 K
FLOH ANGLE IS FROM THE MERIDIONA1 DIRECTION
RADIUS OF SHROUD
25.656 CENTIMETERS
RADIUS OF HUB
9.1465 CENTIMETERS
AXIAL DISTANCE FROM ROTOR HUB LEADING EDGE -2.475 CENTIMETERS
MASS FLOW RATE MEASURED WITH ORIFICE 54.575 KG/SECOND
STATIC PRESSURE ON THE SHROUD
0.8077 _ P REF.
STATIC PRESSURE ON THE HUB
0.8515 _ P REF.
RADIUS OF SHROUD
24.4043 CENTIMETERS
RADIUS OF HUB
12.0167 CENTIMETERS
AXIAL DISTANCE FROM ROTOR HUB LEADING EDGE 11.011 CENTIMETERS
ENERGY AVERAGED TOTAL PRESSURE RATIO ACROSS ROTOR 1.642
MASS AVERAGED TOTAL TEMPERATURE RATIO ACROSS ROTOR 1.164
ROTOR ADIABATIC EFFICIENCY 0.95
STATIC PRESSURE ON THE SHROUD
1.2589 _ P REF.
STATIC PRESSURE ON THE HUB
1.0025 _ P REF.
35
TABLE IV.--GEOMETRIC PARAMETERS USED IN PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS
[Areas used cover only a portion of the span. Approximately 1.5-percent blockage at the hub and 1,26-percent blockage at the tip were assumed to account
for aerodynamic blockage of endwall layers, At station 1 only values of measured conditions from tables lll(a) and Co) corresponding to radii herein should be used.[
36
TABLE V.--COMPARISON OF INTEGRATED FLOW RATES AT STATIONS 1 AND 2 TO THE ORIFICE FLOW
]Mass flow rates for station 1 differ from those given in figs. 13 and 14 because only the 9 positions given in table IV were used to calculate the flow rates
herein whereas all radial positions listed in tables Ill(a) and (b) were used to calculate the flow rates shown in the figures.]
37
TABLE VI.--LASER ANEMOMETER MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS
% CHORD AP RP WNBEG
% CHORD AP RP WNBEG
cm cm
cm cm
38
TABLE VI.--Continued.
39
TABLE VI.--Continued.
4O
TABLE Vl.--Continued.
41
TABLE Vl.--Continued.
42
TABLE Vl.--Continued.
43
TABLE Vl.--Continued.
44
TABLE Vl.--Continued.
45
TABLE Vl.--Concluded.
% CHORD AP RP WNBEG
cm cm
46
ORIFICE
ATMOSPHERE;
INLET "'_Q_r_
STRAIGHTENER
TEST SCREEN 7
I
STAGE -_ [
DRIVE GEAR- /PLENUM-a /
MOTOR -_ BOX-_ I _,l
w 304.1
i
W - RELATIVE VELOCITY /J
U - BLADE VELOCI
U =
394.(I
V - ABSOLUTE VELOCITY // _O.5
V=
W = 445.5_ ROT!TION
C-88-05331
V = 182.9 M/SEC
ORIGINAL PAGE
47
BLACK AND WHITE PHOTOGRAPN
liP CLEARANCE _ 0,1016 CM
SHROUD CONTOUR
CONTOUR
l : 9.03 CM
ROTATING HUB
[ -I,374 CM Z : 9.365 CM
Z
\'_//\'FNPC
"_f COORDINAIES IN TABLE ]
MERI[)IONA[ I)IS1ANCE
_ S[fiLI ACT 2
C[ 7 -_-_- 1
/.___.s_ Z _ [FADING CIRCLE
/ / CIRCLE
Z ...... /\
_I_AI_B INTABLE
, SURFACF 2 ±
AI K 1 ARE _OR A
BLUN! BLADE
(b)
Figure 4.--Definition of blade and flowpath geometry nomenclature used in tables I and 11.
48
AERO STATION 1j
/
/" AERO STATION 2 SPAN,
26-- -_ 7 PERCENT
10
22 --
30
• °
18 -- 50
8 • • 70
14 -- " " 90
10 "--- /
j
AP = -q.652 CM _ -2.159 CM L8.852 CM
LA OPTICAL AXIS]
I
o"I I i I I I
-10 -5 0 5 10 15
AP, CM
Figure 5.--Meridional view of test fan rotor showing laser anemometer and
aerodynamic survey locations. CIRCUMFERENTIAL
MEASUREMENT
LINE_,
/- O.013-CM-DIAMETER 0
,/ THERMOCOUPLE WIRE
/
,/
Figure 7.--Definition of circumferential measurement line.
/ / //
•'::
O.21G-CM i-O.tl76_CM
O. 152 CM DIA/'[TER DIAMETER
(a)
/"_8 h _1 _,_._0.117 CM
"\_"0.476-CM
O.03,-c.-OIA,
/ g3gTER DIAMETER
HOLES
EACH
SIOE
(b)
(a) Cobra probe for total pressure, total temperature, and angle measurements.
(b) Wedge probe for static pressure measurements.
49
_ PASSAGE I/ PASSAGE _2/
AP
11213141516
I,
181911011111211311,11s11611,11811912o
""e
WINDOW NUMBER
OPR
AERO
SURVEY
AERO
STATION 1
SURVEY
I
I
STATION 2
STATOR
LOCATION
oo0O
o o o
)-
°ooo °
I I I I I I I I I I I I 101 a
PERCENT PITCH
Figure I1.--Meridional view of measurement surface constructed from
straight-line interpolation between known design streamline coordinates.
II IiIIltl
50
.7
.6
.94 m
NEARPEAl( EFFICIENCY iI
¢; .
o
N
t_j
o oo 0
N .90 --
0 (_-NEAR STALL
o
.86 --
0 .2 .4 .fi .8 1.0
FRACTION OF SPAN FROM HUB TO CASING
0
Figure 13.--Axial velocity distribution at inlet survey station at near peak
efficiency flow rate. Flow rate from orifice, 34.57 kg/sec; critical velocity
.82 I I I I I at standard-day conditions, VSTD, 310.63 m/sec.
1.8 --
/- NEAR STALL
o NEAR PEAK
©
1.7 EFFICIENCY "7
/
Oo i
/
O
1.6 o
u')
0-
o
1.5 m o
1.rIB
o ,_._ KG/$EC
Figure 14.--Axial velocity distribution at inlet survey station at near stall flow
rate. Flow rate from orifice, 32.31 kg/sec; critical velocity at standard-
day conditions, VSTD, 310.63 m/sec.
51
120-PERCENT
CHORD
I
I
80 7p_TRcCHE
NT
BEG + 50
/ f / 50-PERCENT
// ////
II iII_
/ jr WNBEG
/
Figure 16. -Schematic representation of constant chord lines used to ph)t
Figure 15.--Schematic representation of constant pitch lines used to plot LA
LA data in blade-to-blade direction upstream and downstream of rotor.
data in streamwise direction through rotor.
52
0.90 0'8//
1,,_ 1.li
/
FLOW FLOW
-1.15
1.3
_1.2 1.4 \
_._'7_ ,._\ \/ l
FLOW FLOW
0.6 y
O. 55
0 1,15_ ,Jr _/
.5
1.1
FLOW ROTATION
/
FLOW ROTATION
Figure 17.--Contour plots of relative Mach numbers at flows near peak efficiency and near stall.
53
RELA1]VE MACH NUMBER RELATIUE FLON kNGLE
l.q" 66.5
1
1 • I
i zlz ;
1.3 63,5
'X
1.2 1] 60.5
1ol 57°5
t
1°0 Eq.5
II
I
z Iz Iz 'j[ i I I I 1I II l_
0.9 51.5
1
D
|°0¢ -- z_ 66.5
z I
63.5
",l,r
1.3 -x I
z I X
1.2
1.!
--
--
t
1
l
20oX
PITCH
60.5
57.5
\
I x
1,0 -- 5q.E
i z lz I
z
Z Ix
I z
I I I l I I I I II
0.9 51.5
z
z 66.5 D
z
z_z l
z
Z
z 63.5
1 .3 --I
z Z
IN
60.5
30. X 1
l
P] %'CH
l I
I.I -- 57.5
Iz
l
l i _ x
l.O -- z I 5'4".5
l ZX 1
Zzl z z z z
l
1 1 I I 1 I s]._ 1 I I I 1 I
0,9
-50 25 lO0 lF5 250 25 -50 25 lOO 175 250
25
x CHORD x CHORD
Figure 18.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle for lO-percent span and near peak efficiency. Broken lines denote location of
blade leading and trailing edges.
54
RELAT]V( MACH MUHBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
]._ 66.5 =
I
1.3 _Z
63.5 -- o
J
N
z
1.2 60.5 --
z erO. X
P]ICH Z
z
l.! 57.5 -- I z
z l
z Z Z£ z
z z Z
1.0 z z 54.5 -- ZZ Z
zzl_ z z Jl
Z
0.9 I I I I I I J
51,5
].q- 66,5 --
1.3 63.6 -- 4=
Z
.X
_ 1"
].2 60.5 --
60. X
PITCH
I.] 57.5 -- Z
Z
Z
• z
z_• =f = z
Z
!.0 64.6 -- zlr z
'Z l z
I
0.9 t I I I
51.5
t
|.4 -- 66.5 m
Z • z
1.3 -- 63.6
Z
%
Z
].2 -- 60.5
60. X
Z
P]TCH
].] - Z 57.5 z
• ;1:
• x
_:x z
].0 -- 54.5
• : z • 1K
l • x
I z
0.9 I I I I I 5] o5 I I I I I
-]25 -50 25 ]00 175 250 25 -50 25 ]OO 175 25O
X CHORD X CHORD
Figure 18.--Continued.
55
RELAI|VE NACH NUMBER REL&1IVE FLON &NGLE
le'_ -- 66,5
z z_
;1[
\
%
63.5 .I
1.3 -- I •
l
1.2 -- Z 60.5 --
70, X
Z
PITCH z[
l.I - 57.5 --
X
Z
z
z
z z z z I l
1.0 -- 5_-.5 -- II
z !
z I I
z
I 1 I I I I
0.9 51,5
l.q- -- 66.5
Z z ,x, I I
m
"'_,r I
1.3 -- t 63.5
! I
z
m
I
1.2 -- z 60.5 =.
I
1.1 -- 57.5 --
z
z z I
z z z
5q',5 --
I I
1.0 - z z I
z
"- _ • z I I
I I I I J 1 ,I I 1
0.9 51 .5
leq" -- 66,5
z I I I
z
I 63.5 "H I
1.3 --
t
I I, I
I• I
].2 --
I _o,5
z l 90. X z
I P]ICH
z I 57.5 I ,_- t
1.1 --
I I z I z
I I I
1.0 -- IzI
_:_j, -_I I ' zz zz 5'_.5 I I I
x
1 I " l [ I 51.5 1 I I [ J
0o9
25 100 175 250 25 -50 25 lO0 175 250
25 -50
X CHORD % CHORD
Figure 18.--Concluded.
56
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELA1]VE FLOW ANGLE
69
zZzZIIIZ/IZzZZ]
illZI lz7 I.
III 4Ili - .lllI lI
__ ilIIizIllZZ" b7 _ iIII IIIzIzIIIIizi
1.3 iiI ]z
IIIiizI izI
ztxzzzxzzzzzzXZXZ
1.2 b5
-]00 X
AXIAL
1.! CHORD b3
1,0 bl
I I I I I 59
I I I I I
0.9
|.d I. m b?
IZli I zl|iiizIIIxZlzIzzIIZIIIIIIII
1.3 67
IziIIiiliIIIIII -- iiIZlIIZIZzzzIIIiiI
._..i
xII IIIIIzZI xz x x.xx.Z/I z IZIIZZzI
!.2 b5
-76, X
AXIAL
1.1 CHORD 63
1.0 61
I I I I I 59
[ I I I J
0.9
].q. -- 69 -
izzzzxzzxzzIZzxZIzz/zXxIxzIi
II izl Ix b7
I. 3 -- Ii IzI
IIiziII II
-- ZI | II IIZl'IZzzzIIIzzl!
1.2 65
"l I11 II ii z Ilii Z Iz i I zII IlzlI II
-58. X
AXIAL
l.] CHORD 63
1,0 61
o. 9 I I I I I s9 I 1 I I I
o 20 qo 60 so SOD o 20 ,+o 6o so nOD
x PI'VCH X PITCH
Figure 19.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 10-percent span and near peak efficiency.
57
REL^T]VE NACH NUHBER gELATIVE FLON ANGLE
b9 --
ZlZZ ZZZ;[zzZZZZzIzZZIzZZZZZZZzZz
I z z[
b7 -- Zzz_r'3ZZzE
| . 3 -- ]ZZlZzZzzzzzlZ
Z aZ X
{ I= z
j[l z T..I
1.2 b5 lZI]r_j[ZZII[_[IzZZZZr_I[=ZIZZEZI
-_'0. X
AXIAL
1.1 CHORD 63
I°0 61
0.? I I 1 I I 59 1 J I I J
leq" -- 69 --
Z zZz zZZ:I Z Z:][ZZ zZzZz ZZ][z.zZZ][Zr
1.3 _ zZzzzz¢zzzzzzzzZZZ"'= 67
-- zzZZZZ_zz.z
[ zzz
zz l
1.2 b5 -.._z z z z= zz z z:z zz z r.z zz z r.z z z z z'z Z IZZz
-23. ,%
AXIAL
I.I CHORD 63
1,0 6]
0,9 I 1 I I I 5q
I I I I I
l.=l b? --
ZIrZZZZ Z][zzZZ:ZzzZzzzZZrzzZ:ZZZI:zZZzIZzT-Z][
][ zz
1.3 Z 67 _ iZZZz
llZZ zl Z
|
z z
Zz
!.2 65
-fi._" X "_[z I z|_ZzzzZr.zZZz_Zzz_:zzzzzzZz_Z
AXIAL
1.! CHORO 63
1.0 61
0.9 I I I I J 5(/ I I t J I
0 20 =tO 60 80 I00 0 20 q'O 60 80 I O0
X PITCH X PITCH
Figure 19.--Continued.
58
RELATIVE MACH NUHBER _ELAT]VE FLON ANGLE
1.S 69 --
l.q" 67
tZ zzZZZzzZz_zZZZZZxZZZzZ3zzZzZZzZZZZZZZ'ZzZZZ
ZX Z
1.3
I 65
3.5X ]J'Z Zz Zxz Zz zzz zz x]r Zzz zz z z z zz z xzzz z zZ z:_ z x.z z:z z zzz T
AXIAL
+3
f
.2 !
CHORD
.! 61
.0 I I I I J I I I I I
59
69 --
67
.3 -- zZzzZxzzzzzzzzzZZ_zZzzzzZZzZxZZZz_zxx_ZZZziI
65
7.9 X
AX]AL
.2 - CHORD 63
.| -- 61
.0 I I I 1 1 59 I I I I J
• 5 - 69
.IF 67
.3 66
]O. X
=z_I
AXIAL
.2 CHORD 63
zzZ I
.I 61
• 0 I I I I .l s9 I I I I _J
0 20 ,tO 60 80 IO0 20 '_0 60 80 I00
X PITCH ,lr P]TCH
Figure 19.--Continued.
59
RELAIIVE NACH NUMBER RELAI]UE FLON ANGLE
.5 6'g
.fl m 67
b5
.3 -- z
13. X
ZZZZ T
AXIAL Zzzzxzxzzz_xZzxzzzzz_zzZzzzZzZ[zzzzZzZ
z
CHORD 63
.2
lzzl
61
ol
I I I I .I I I I I 1
59
°0
.5 b3 I
6] Z
h
__ Z.[ Z ZZ ZZ Z Z_I:Z Z Z ZZ Z_[ Z Z'Z ZZ I ZZ Z Z Z ZZ Z_[ i Z-Z Z Z
59 _ z=zi!
.3
15. X
][
AXIAL
zZZzzz I CHORD
.2
1.]
I I I I 1 I I I I _1
53
1.0
b_ - "'=%=']/
Z_szszz=_ z-zzzzszzZzZz ZZZz:zrZZZzz z
59
!
1.3 m
]8, X
AX ] AL
=='=====z]I CHORD 57
1.2
I°] 55
I I -J 53 I I I I .I
l.O
_0 60 80 ] O0 0 20 q-O 60 80 ! O0
0 EO
X PIICH
X PIICH
Figure 19.--Continued.
60
RELATIVE NACH MUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
].5--
63 -- z=zz
=====-•=====x=z =_= zxzz=zz z-_u •
z
b] -- z
==ZZzzz] [1
zz== •z == • =zzzZ==Zz • _ • zZx zz== zz zz z
1.3 z
59
z 20. X
Zzz z AXIAL
.2 Zzlz CHORD 57
.! 55
.0 I I I I I I I I I I
53
•5 -- 63 n
.=1 61 -- zz
zz z
ZZZ8 zzz_zzZZZz z_ ZZzzZzzz z_zz zZ_z
.3 _ =z_zI
59
=zz 23. X
AXIAL
:[zzz
.2 z
CHORD 57
zzzz]
56 -
I i I I I I I I I
53
.5 -- 63 --
m Z
6] ZzzzzlrczzzzZzzZz_zzz2zZzzz ¢=ZZz r
Zx
Zz= zzZ ZzzzZ z_[ZZZZ_zz:z zzz z.z zZZZz
1.3 59 TTZZzn, z]lr T] i
26. X
zz
AX]AL
z_ z
1.2 -- Zz CHORO 57
zz
Z_rzI
].! 55
1.0 I I I I I 5a I I I I I
20 q'O 60 8O 100 0 20 fl-0 60 80 I00
X P]TCH •11; P]TCH
Figure 19.--Continued.
6]
I:_ELAI]VE FLOH ANGLE
RELATIVE HACH NUMBER
• 5 --
63
l/=xxzxzzzZzJZxZZzZXZXzzzz:rJ z
.or m b]
z
ZX AXIAL
zz
CHORO 57
.? zz
ZZzzzz;]
.I -- 55
I I I 1 I 53
I I I I J
°o
.5 - 63
]£zzZZZZzZZX'ZZZZZzZZZzZzZ:ZZ z
.'F d 6]
][zzzzZ zzzZZzzzzzzzZZZzzzzZ z
z
' Z
ZZ It
59
.3 z 30. X -- Xzx.zz:zzzzlzIT
AXIAL
lrz: r
.? CHORD 57
.] -- B6
I I I I I I I I I .]
.0 53
•5 - 63
l.q- 6] __ Z
Z
Z
Z z:zx zzzZzzzz_[ z zz zZ zzZZzz rl
1.3 59
33. X - ZZzzzzzzzZZZZZ]t
z AXIAL
z
CHORO 57
1.2 __ zz
zz
EZZzz Z
!*]
55
ZZzz
I I I I J 53 I I I I ._1
I.O 0 20 q-O 60 80 IO0
0 20 _o 60 go 100
x PIICH X PITCH
Figure 19.--Continued.
62
RELAI]U£ MACH NUMBER RELATIUE FLON ANGLE
.5 63 --
_3 ] "--]XxzxzLZIx_zZ_ZzzzzzzzzZZzz
i]!
_zzZzzzZZZ=ZXz_zZ=zXZZzz
_ I
.3 59 -
z 36. X
Z AXIAL
Z ZIIZIZIzzIIlIIlII
.2 -- Z CHORO 57 -
Zz
Zz
.] E5 -
-- ZZZZz l
Z'= Zzx I i I!
.0
I I i I s3 I ]
.5 -- 63
1.2
.4
.3
-_;[ z :[zZ z_ Z:[z zz z z_[ x_ z zz Zz
z"
Z
z
Z
Z
38.
AXIAL
CHORO
X
61
5'9
57
_
._ Z Z Z ][Z WZ Z Z:][Z:I[ Z Z'J[ZZ Z ZZ ZZ 1'
-
Z
Z
Zzz zlZ II
I1
Z
z
Z
I.I 66
ZZTZZz z
Zzzzz i
1.0 I I I I .I 53 I I +J
|.5 -- 63 --
' ]
Z
!.3 Z 59
_0. X
Z -- lli zzZZ!
Z AX]AL
Z
1.2 Z CHORO 57 IIIIHIIIIII
Z
Z
Z
l.I 55
Z_Zzz_x_==z
X P]TCH X PITCH
Figure 19.--Continued.
63
RELAIIV[ MACH NUHBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
]._ 7zzzzZnZZzZZIzzzl 63 --
I
I
1.3 -- t 61
I izzuzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
I I
I i
1.2 -- I 59
l q'3, X ]
I AXIAL
z
1.I -- x CHORO 5?
1.0 __ zzzzZzZZzzZz 55
0.9
I l I I i J 53
63 --
TIlzrzzzzzzzZZ£z z
1.3 _ z 61
I
l
I
I
i.2 1 59
Z
q'5, X
Z
AXIAL
Z
].i Z CHORO 57
z I
Zzz_zzzu=_u '
1,0 66
0.9 I I I I --i 53
o.9 I I I I J 53 I I 1 1 I
0 20 =fO 60 80 100 0 20 q-O 60 80 00
X P]]CH X PITCH
Figure 19.--Continued.
64
RELATIU[ FLON ANGLE
R_I.&III#[ MACH HUHBEI_
6O
_z_m_mJmnl
zI -]zzzIIzzlz]z"[,l
I I ,z]
1.3 - LI 58
Z
Z
z
56
_- ':il
],::n:.,,,..z*'*
1.2 1 60. X
Z
AXIAL
Z
1.1 z CHORD 5'1-
z_z
! I I I I I l l I ._.I
0.9 5O
6O
1., -_IIIllllIIIl]
I
I
Z
1.3-- 58
I _ zz
I
I
1.2 -- z 56
53° X
!
AXIAL
1
1ol -- z CHORD 5't-
]r
z
XZZzzzzzmzlzs_l_
1.0
62
I I I ._! I I I I 11
I
0.9 I 5O
6O
loq" "]m_i_ll
r
I 68
1.3-
Z
g
I
1.2 - 56
Z 65. X
I AXIAL
l
l.I -- CHORO Sq"
Z
1.0-- 52
I I I .__1 50
I I 1 I ._.J
0.9 i
0 ;m 'tO 60 80 100 20 q'O 60 80 tO0
X PIICH X PITCH
Figure 19.--Continued.
65
RELATIVE MACH _UMBER REL^IIVE FLOW ANGLE
! q..jdzxi 60 --
• Iii
I IIZZIIIliI
I
1.3 -- 58 - II
I
I zI
I
x
I l l
1.2 -- 56
I 58. X Ii I zI
I IIIItiiiTz z
AXIAL
l°l -- I CHORD
II
I1
0.9 I t 1 I 5O I I I I ,._.J
I • '_ "Iz'zr_ I 60 --
I
I IzZzZzIIIi .n
1.3 --
I
I 6e - II 1 z'""
t
I
1.2 --
I 60. X 56 - I_i 'r/z
I AXIAL IIIiiiIlzzzZ
I.! -- I CHORD 5_ --
I
I
0.9 J I 1 I ...J
50 I I I I _._J
l,q- 6O
IIIIi
I
I zZzIZZlIi" z_z'
1.3 -- I 68
- II zz
I
I
11 i x
-"
1.2 56
-- I
63. X
- IT z
I
AXIAL
I tIiiziiiizzr_Zr_z
I.I CHORD 5_
1.0 52
Figure 19.--Continued.
66
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE
! ._ -Izz 60
I
I
1.3 - I 5B zzZItlIil /,
I Eiii
I II ,'
z_rtz
1,2 -- I 56 __ I1 .
66, X
I III z_
I AXIAL llllllIlZ
l.l -- I CHORD
IIZ_IZIIzzz _*_B z ]
].0 -
""n'""" ]1
0.9 I I I I / I 50 I I I I ._I
1,4 bO --
I 888st1[
I
IzitZzi ,,
1.3 68
I
- IIII ,z'"
I
I II zzzz
1.2 -- Z 56
1 68. X - llllliiZizzZ
II AXIAL
I
I.! CHORD 5_
Illllzz z
1.0 52
1.3
I.E 5&
?0. X
AXIAL
I.! CHORO 5_
Illz lille II Ill ix ZXZZtts n ,,..,......,,N,..,..
1.0 52
Figure 19.--Continued.
67
_ELAT]VE MACH NUMBER RELAT]VE FLOH ANGLE
1.3 --
1.2 --
I I 75 X
I AK]AL
I CHORD
I.l --
Z1zz z
ZIZZzIzzZzl[ZZX_ gWZZJ
l I i I 50 --
I 1 1 1
O._ --
|,_- -- 6O
1.3 -- 68
-- zZZZ:Zz
1.2 -- 56
78. X tt I zzZ"z U
_I AXIAL
I iI iiiit IIIlzI;zzz
1.1 -- Z CHORD
ZZz IIiiziiiiIll
ZZ_z==
1.0 --
ZZZ ZzZzzZZZzlZZem •
j il_[z'zzzzzi ..
5O
I I I I
0,9
|._. m 60
1.3 -- 68 -
5& --
80, X
10 Zzx.z 52 --
z]
IZII z -- zzZZz =d=em
I I I t
0.?
0 20 _'0 60 80 DO 0 20 _0 60 80 O0
X PITCH X PITCH
Figure 19.--Continued,
68
RELAT]VE MACH NUMBER RELAIIVE FLOW ANGLE
l.I 60
].0 58
Z] l Z] Zl Z ill1 Z ][IZI][ EIZI zzll It ][I
Izlzl z= • ===_=z
_ IiiiIIIIzIzIlzzIIzzzz=zzI
0.9 56
z
9]. J_
illIIII
AX]AL
0,8 CHORD 5q iIII
[]IIiIIII
0.7 62
0.6 I I I 50
I I I l
O 20 '+0 60 80 lO0 0 20 _0 60 80 00
x PITCH X P|ICH
Figure 19.--Continued.
69
RELAT]VE MACH NUMBER RELAIlVE FLOW ANGLE
].2 57.5 --
1.0 53,5
IO0 X
0.8 q9,6
O.1 I I 1 I I '_7.s I I I I I
],2 57,5
IiIIIlllIIIIl. _I
illlllll
qIIIIi_ TIIII
1.] 6S.6
iii It
I
l.O 53.5
0,9
"_z=zzZZ=ZZzzZZzzzzz
l
z
i
tiZZzZzz_zzZ_=""" 12_ X
AXIAL
CHORD 51.5
1/
Z
0.8 l _9.5
t
I I I I I ,_7,s I I [ I I I
O.1
I.E 57.5 --
].l 66.6
1.0 4 53,5
] ,'
]_9 X
AXIAL
- II:::
0.9 ., ...... =,_==zz=zz]zzz;iiil_Z,..,z,zz==,, .. ....... CHORD 51 .B
0.8 _9.5 --
0.7 I I I I I _7.s I I I I I
5O 70 90 ] I 0 I 30 ]50 50. lO. 90. ]I0. I30. ]50.
X PITCH X PllCH
Figure 19.--Continued.
7O
RELAT]VE NACH MUNBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
m
]*2 m 57.5
I.! 55,5
1.0 53,5
I73Z m II]II::ZlZ
zzZz z:ZZZ Z xZ Z'Z zZT UZZZ i" AX I _4L
-- I I ]II zz:zzzzzzxzzzzzzzzs_zz
0.9 CHORD 5 ] • 5
0.8 _9.5
I J I I J _7.5
I I I I I
0.7
1.2 -- 57.5
l.] n 65.5
53.5
IIII 1
z",zzz,ZZZZzzz:zz]Z
1.0 ...xxZxzzzZXzXx"zZZZzZl z
]88 X
0.8 q-9.5
I I I I I '_7.5
I I I I I
0.?
]*2 57.5
].! 55.6
- Ill i
1.0
Z z_ Z zz zXZ XZ Z'I Z [Z ].Z Z z 53.5 _'"m'mm'mzll II ,iiiiiZIZZZ ZI
-- Z, zzzzzzzzzuzzxzz ]97 X
ZZxz AXIAL
t]iiinzz
_ III/IZZ CHORD 51,6
0.9
0.8 _9.5 --
I I ! I J _7.5 I I I I I
0.7
60 70 90 I lO 130 150 50. 70. 90. |lO. 130, ]50,
Figurel9.--Continued.
71
RELAT]VE NACH NUHBER RELAT]VE FLON ANGLE
57,5
I.] 55,5
0.8 q'9.5
0.7
I I I I I _7.5
I I I I I
]q, 2 _ 57.5
1.1 m 65.6
1,0 53.5
_xnzZzzzZZzzzzlrzzz] xxzzzZzZXZ xzzzzxxz 231F X
AXIAL
ZZzZzzz_'"
0.9 CHORD 51 .S
0,8 'F9.5 --
0.7 I I I I _7.s I I I I J
50 7O 90 ]]0 ]30 150 50. 70. 90. llO. )30. |50.
X P]TCH X PITCH
Figure 19.--Concluded.
72
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER gEL^lIVE FLOW ANGLE
I .50 -- 68
• ,4
Z
Z
\
I .20 -
4 6O
10.0 X
I x
PIICH
I 56
I .05 -- -- Z
I I II
J t Z Z
52
I
0°90 -- I I
I I I z
J I J I _F8
I I I I
0.75
I .50 - 68
• • =1
I .35 -- 6_
Z
-- it _
I .20 --
• Z
60 - \
Z
20, X
P]1CH
I .05 -- 5/'
Z
I
• • Z Z
0.90 -- 62
J I I I I I I
0.75 q'8
I .50 -- 68 m
I
Z
I • &q-
I .36 --
\
Z %
1.20 -- 60 - %
Z 30. X
Z
PITCH
z
I .05 -- 56
z
• • Z
l I
B • •
I 52
0.90 --
I
I II II I I '1"8
I 1 I I ,J
0.75
I_0 200 O0 -_0 20 80 I_0 200
O0 -_0 20 BO
X CHORD x CHORD
Figure 20.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number flow angle at 20-percent span and near peak efficiency. Broken lines denote location of blade
leading and trailing edges.
73
RELAT]VE NACH NUMBER RELATIUE FLON ANGLE
I .50 68 --
s •
I .35 n
6_ -- s
z z z •
Z
\
1.20 60 -- %
$0. X
Z
PITCH
1.05 m
56 -- Z
%
0.90 52 -
0.75 I I i J l
_8
1.50 68 --
I
] .35 m
64 --
i[ z
,%
1.20 z
60 --
50. X
z
PITCH
I .05 m 56 --
i
Z Z
0.90 52 --
0°75 I I I I I I
l .50 b8 --
I
] .35 b4" --
,it
I .20 I
% 60. X
bO --
Pl TCH
I :
I .05 56 --
%
0.90 52 -- I I
I I
0.75
I I 1 I I I I I I I I I
00 -q'o 20 80 190 BOO - O0 -_0 20 80 lq.o 200
X CHORD X CHORO
Figure 20.--Conunued.
74
RELATIVE H^CH NUHBE9 RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE
I .50 68 --
• I
1 .35 z 6dF --
1.20 m
6O
_z 70. X
• PITCH
! .05
• 56
0.90 I 52
I
0.75 I I I I I 1 I qe I I I I
1 .50 -- 68 --
I
1 .36 -- 6'1" --
• I
Z • ,m
@
Z
qb
1.20 -- 60 -
80. X
Z I,.
PIICH ,%
1.05 -- 56 - • %.:
¢
i
0.90 -- 52 -
0.75 I I I I q8 1 I I I I
1.50 -- 68 --
I I
! .3E --
I •.J
6or
Z z • .?,
llla,
I .20 -- 6O m
90. X
PITCH
1.05 -- I " 56 m
I Z
0.90 -- 52
I
0.75 I II I[ I I '_e I I I I I 1 I
O0 -_0 20 80 ! _0 200 -I00 -q.O 20 80 1 _0 2O0
X CHORD X CHORD
Figure 20.--Concluded.
75
RELAIIUE HACH NUMBER flELAIIV[ FLON ANGLE
r
i
1 .q'O 69
I .35 b7
zzzZXZZZZXZxzXXzzXzzzzzzzzzx-ZZZzzzZzzzzzxzZzzzzzZ
I .30 iiiliIIIIIIIIlIIIIIIii b5
-80. X
-IIt t III
AXIAL
1.20 bl
,I I I I I 59
I I I I I
1.15
1 .qO b9
I .36 b?
,,iIIIIllllllIIIIii.
1.30 65 ZZZ Z"TZZ Z ZZEz ZZzzz][ ZZ ZZZ Z_[Z_[Z ZZZzz ZZzz 1Z zxZ ZZz X
_ illll
IIII111 il -$0. X
Z
AXIAL
CHORD b3
I .25
--lllIlillliillllll
1.20 bl
I I I I I 59
I I I ! I
1.15
1 ._0 b? -
1.35 b? i
lllllllllIIIIlllIllll]
zZZ'-'z%z z
] zI Z Zz
I .30 b5
- I ,iiillll
I -20. X -- Z ZXZzz:ZZZZZ:Z
! .20 61
I I I I I s_ I I I I I
1.15
o 2o _o 60 eo 1oo z 22 _z 62 e2 102
X PITCH X PITCH
Figure 21.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 20-percent span and near peak efficiency.
76
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELAT]VE FLOW ANGLE
.'_-0 69 --
.35 67 --
IIZZzzz
:llIllllI I IiiilllnltlIIl
,,3O 65 --
-- t .,111111111131 - I o. x Z
I ZZXZrZZixxZZXXXXzXXzZXX:XzZxxzX. x
z-zzZZzZZZ
I111111111" A X I ^L
.25 -- CHORD 63 --
.2O 6] --
.15 I I I I I I I I I
.uro 69 --
.36 67 -- Z
Ix
llI I lliiIiiiIIIi III
I z
1,30 65 -- I I
.2o 61 --
.15 I 1 I I I 59
I I I I I
69 --
i
.35 67
I z
iIiiiIIIIIIIIIIIIII
.3O - ] 65 ZIzz
O.OX zxz z I
IIIIIITIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII AXIAL
XxZzzXzZZzZZZzlzZZzZZlz]Zzzzzxxzlzzzz I
.25 -- IiI CHORD 63
I
I
.20 61
.]5 I I I I I 59 I I I I I
0 2O _ro 6O 80 i00 2 22 q-2 62 82 102
X P]ICH X PIICH
Figure 2 l.--Continued.
77
REL&TIVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
l .00 I 56 --
IIIIIIIIiIIiIiiIriiI
I
i]l]lllllllI
lllllI:I .._;TIIIIIIIIIIII.
0.95 I 5'_
-_iiiIii='" i
Z
0.90 52
I00 x
^KIAL
0.80 N8
I I I 46
1 l I I I
0.75
] .00 -- 58
zzZzzzZ2ZzZZzzz
0.95 zz z 66
-- zz z ZTZ zZZlzl_[zzz
• 1 IiZI
1
]I::
0.80
l l
iiI l l
BO
I I I I I
0.75 _8
] .00 -- 58
zzZZZ_ZZz
m
0.96 66
_ZZzzz==Z=_zz=ZzzzZlz zzZZ z
z===,_..,,===,,_,=z=,.zIII"
t II L [ .III2.ZZZIIZIII
:t kXIkL
I I I 1 I _8
I l l l I
0.75
5O 70 90 II0 130 150 50 tO 90 IlO 130 150
% PITCH X P]TCH
Figure 2 l.--Continued.
78
RELATIVE HACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE
! .OO 58 --
0.9,5 m
_ZZZ_I_ZZIIzzZZZZz Z _I[z_z_Zzz 56
B
0.80 60
0.75 I I I I I I I I I I
'1"8
1.075 58 --
IIIZIZIIlIIIIzIIIIIIi
I iiiilillZl
1.026 66
- zI II:
0.975 _ i iii
I 54
I ,ezx
0.925 --
llli]l AxI^t
CHOR0 52 I
0.876 6O
0.825 I 1 I I I 48 I I I I I
1.075 58 -
1 .026 56
.,z:.'z_nzzzzzzUzZlllllliilllllZz.zzzzzzn
0.975 54
-zlIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIZIIIII
I .IfllllIllllll E01 1
0.925 -- CHORD 52
llllil]llliJ AxIAL
0.8?5 50
0.825 I I I I I 48 I I I I I
50 70 90 I ]0 130 I 50 5O 70 90 I l0 I 30 150
X PITCH % PIICH
Figure 2 l.--Concluded.
79
RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE
RELATIVE EACH NUHBER
i " 50 [ 65
I =
z z •
*it Z
I ,z[ 61
I "35 --
..I "
z-
• "1-" 57
z
z
1 "2Q --'== • 10.0 X
I
PIICH Zzz
t 53
I "05 --
m
I z •
I _9 z
0"90 --
u i =T
I
I I I II J
0"75
I I I ",5
1.50 -- 65
I I
_g
I b]
[ .35 -- • Z
.I • Z
qeg
I "
57
1.2_ -- ! 20, X
z z I
PITCH
I [
z I I[z •
1.05 --
I I
z z
I I ,
• Z
0.90 -- i •
• I
I
II 1 I I i II ]
0.75
I I _5
1.50 -- 65
I =
I
1.35 --
I "% bl • • Z
<
I"-
I ; "='l
-=
57
1.20 "-,= z Zz
30. X
I
I
PITCH
%
53
! .05 -- ! t •
I z
z
z
0.90 - _9 t"I
Z
m
I
m I
I 1 I I1 I _5 I I [ I[ l
0.75 90 135 -90 -_'5 0 _'5 9O 135
-90 -_5 o '1.5
X CHORD X CHORD
Figure 22.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 30-percent span and near peak efficiency. Broken lines denote location o
blade leading and trailing edges.
8O
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOE ANGLE
! .50 65 --
I
Ic •
I .35 61 -- m
%
Z
1.2Q 57 --
z z
,I
! °05
I %
53 -- Z
I | I £ •
II •
0.90
I i
;Ill Z i
ze • e _9 --
• m
I I
0.75 I I J I I IF5 I I I 11
I .50 65 -
I I
zz
I " ,I
I .35 Z 61 -
I ,,,"
• • IIz
1.20 z 57 - z
50. X
I
z PITCH
1.05 I ,, 53 -
I Z
Z
Z
lit zz Z
a II1_ o
0.90 _9 --
I
0.75 I I I T5
I II I
! •50 - 65 --
• z z
I¢
1.3B - 6] --
1 20 -- • • owl
57 --
• z z
• Z 60, X
z
P]TCH lit z
1.0S -- 53 --
I z • • f ,
Iz
Z
II "
0.90 -- .1 • H? --
1
I I
0.75 I l II I '_5 I I 11 I
-90 -H5 0 H5 9O ] 35 -go -q-5 0 H5 9O 135
X CHORD X CHORD
Figure 22.--Continued.
8l
RELA1]VE MACH NUMBER RELAT]VE FLON ANGLE
I .50 -- b5
I =. J
I
I .35 -- dK bi
,5: 57
I .Eg == 7O.X
z
P]TCH
I .05 -- '5, 53
_ mn •
5 I1=
°i •
0.90 -- o i ur9
0.75 I I I _5
I I I
1.50 -- b5 --
I z
==
I
I • I
1.36 -- 61 --
E_
I
1.20 _= =
.]. 57 --
iiw _. Z
0.90 -- _9 --
0.75 $5
I I I I
1.35 -- 65
z= • _ T
s an
I. 2q -== =
":"';]1
[It'
1.05 -- 57
0.90 -- 53
-- II z l
I
0.75 --
O.bO
I 1 . I II I 'l-5
9O -_5 o 'F5 90 135 90 -'_5 O _5 90 1 35
x CHORD % CHORD
Figure 22.--Concluded.
82
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELAIIV[ FLON ANGLE
1.4-- b 3 "--'_ZIl zZ ZZz Zz ZZZZZ Z'Z'Z ZZ| ZzzZzzZ Z_ZZZrZ ZZA" _''7"Z _
1.0 59
-IO0 x
AXIAL
0.8 CHORD 57
0.6 5E
0,4" I I I I I 53 I I I I I
63 _z zZzzZZzzZ:Zzzxz:zzzzzzZz:zzzzz_zZz_zzzzzzzzz.-XXzZ
1.2 "_z li! "_ i| _sz = | • mmi|l • |l! zzzzzz • _mz z=zm_nl_m 6! -
l.O 59 -
-80. X
AXIAL
O.8 CHORD 57 --
0.6 E5 --
0.4- I I I I I s3 I I I I I
|.q. m
63 -,,tzzZxTxZzZzZ:ZZzzzzZzZzZzZzZzZZzZzxrZzzzz:zxXztzrzx
!.2
I II illlll II Im IP IIImlll Illlll iiilll Illl II II I Illllll I!1
61
1.0 59
-76. X
AXIAL
0.8 CHORD 57
0.6 55
o.+ I I I I I 53 I I I I I
O 20 fl'O 60 80 I O0 20 _0 60 gO ] O0
X PIICH X PITCH
Figure 23.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 30-percent span and near peak efficiency.
83
_EL^IIVE MACH NUMBER RELA1]vE FLOW ANGLE
1,0 59
-60. X
AX|AL
0.8 CHORD 57
0.6 66
I I 1 I I 53
I i i I ,I
0._
63
-- iziZlziiiIizii
.iII Izxll .
IZZZ ZA "ZIIzZIZ/IZZZZ'ZIZZIII
1,0 59
-_0. X
AXIAL
CHORO 57
65
I I I I J 53
I I I I I
0,4
63
-- iizlliiZllii
oo exul • _ em o •
1.2 61
IEmsnl••i
1,0 59
-20. X
AX ] AL
0.8 CHORD 57
0.,6 m 55
I I I I I 53 I I I I I
0,4
• 0 60 8O I00 ?0 _-0 60 80 !00
0 20
X PITCH X P]ICH
Figure 23.--Continued.
84
RELAT]VE NACH NUMBER
RELAT]VE FLON ANGLE
I,T--
63 --
lllI
I I
].2 B • IEle !
I
• Z
6] -- ZZZzzzZZzrxz.xZZz2L_zzZl_xzzzz •
e_u z zzzl_11zzz zz
1,0 59 m
-]0. X
&XIkL
0.8 CHORD 57
0.6
55
0,_ I I I I I 53 I I I I J
|.q- --
63 --
e_e_ 8
1.2 -- Z I I
Z_z z J -- Z ZZZZZzzzz:xzZzzzzZ:Xzz Zzzz_xZzzz zzzzzz
zzzszz z
l.O 5_
-6.l X
^X]^L
0.8 CHORO 57
0.6 E6
I I I I I I I I I I
53
I.q 63 --
III
1.2
61
ZzzZ _,_zZ I IZZZzzzz_rzzzrznz'_nez_rz_u=,_8_,_ =
1.0 59
-2.6 X
AX]AL
0.8 CHORO 57
0.6 55
O,q- I I I I I I I I I I
53
20 q'O 60 80 1 O0 0 20 q-O 60 130 i O0
X P]TCH X PITCH
Figure 23.--Continued.
85
gELATIU[ FLOH ANGLE
gELA]IUE MACH NUHBEg
63
ZI
I
].2 61
-- ] ][XZZz _z_ zz mmz_z zzzzr Zzmmm
1.0 59
0.0 X
AXIAL
0.6 CHORD 57
0.6 65
I I 1 I I 53
I I I J J
O.at
_eq" --
63
61
z ['I X ¢zzz zzzzxT_z zZ E
I1.0
•2 IT,=.'"" 59 I
2.5X
AXIAL
0.8 -- CHORO 57
0.6 - 55
I I I I I I I I
o.at J I 53
]eat
63
1.2 61
_ Z Cz rsz Zzzx zwz zz I ZlEZxz_zuz x_ Ix 8 mz _ zzZI_Z
l,O 59
5.0X
AXIAL
0.8 CHOI_O 57
0.6 55 -
I I I I ]
o._ I I I I J 53
I00 0 20 q'O 60 80 !00
o 20 atO 60 80
X P J "I'CH
X PIICH
Figure 23.--Continued.
86
RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER
b3
b!
Ixzzm
I •2 -.,I
.......... " zI
I zzzlc.wzz,zs_z zzz_zz_zzz.zzi_tI_czz z
z
5q B
1.0
7,6X z
AXIAL
, z]
CHORD 57
0,8 ZZ
0*6 -- E6
I I I I I I I I I I
0._ 53
63
1.2 6]
1.0 59 z
10. X
AWIAL
z zI
CHORO 57
zZ
E6
I I i I I 53
I I I I
O.q"
|._. m 63
_m_m_zumm
Z_ _ m
m
1,2 61
J m m mm_K I
CHORD 57
O.B
zzzz_]
0.6 55
I I I I I I I I I
--J 53
0._ 8O LO0
20 _0 60 80 lO0 20 _0 60
X PITCH X PITCH
Figure 23.--Conlinucd.
87
RELAT]VE MACH NUMBER I_ELAT]UE FLOH ANGLE
1.7 60
ziE I
_t I :L_ZZZzZZZZzzzzz z
1.5 58
......... z
zhrtzzZI
I:
1.3 56
]5. X
AXIAL
0.9 52
0.7 I I I I I 5O
I I I I
1.7 6O
1.5 58 Z
z
1.3 56
23. X 1
z
^X]^L
ZzzZ ZZZzzzZTI
I.I CHORD 5't"
0.9 52
0.7 I I I I .I 5O I I I I .I
!.7 bO --
G8 - Zz ]1|
z
1.3 56 -
25. X
lliiIIII I
0.9 52
0.7 I I I I l 50 I 1 I l __sJ
0 20 q-O 60 eo 100 2 22 • 2 62 82 102
X PITCH X PIICH
Figure 23.--Continued.
88
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
1.7-- b0 --
1.3 56 -- z
30. X
AXIAL
O.9 6E --
0,7 I I I I ..I 5o I I I I .. I
|./ m 60
].6 58 ZZIIIZIIIII|II
• _==m em z
I =m _ wt¢
Z
].3 56
z
="='="= I 33 • X
• AX] AL
• I
5_r
==="="=====,==x CH 0 R O
Z_zZZIZIIiiiiiiiziZiI II
0.9 -- 62 --
0.7 I I I I ..I 5O 1 I I I
].? bO
1.6 EB
_zx'XZZz//Zzz
,Zz_llrllll811
Z
1.3 56 Z
36, X
Z
AXIAL
1.! CHORD 5q" zz_zzIIII I II•
illlliiiiI
I
0,,9 5E
0.7
I I I l ..I 50 I I I _._J
20 _0 60 80 100 22 _E 62 BE I02
X PITCH x PITCH
Figure 23.--Continued.
89
RELAT]VE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE
1°7-- 60
1.5 58
t ttlizzi
I
1.3 56 l
_'0. X z
AXIAL I
!.! CHORD 54
ZzzzzIIIIi _iZI
]I_illiIIlZ IIu
0.9 62
0.7 I J ] I .I 5O 1 1 I I .... I
1,7 bO --
1.6
i.3
_3. X
" tI
56 IlZzz
I z
AXIAL
I
1.1 CHORD 54 -
ZZzzzZI]]I, I
_IIii.ZlilZlIillIlltI
0.9 62 -
let --
i]
58
1.6
1,3
-IIZz,,,L
-- Iz
i] I
Ii '_6, X 56 ti z
IZl z
Zz .I AX ] AL z I
1.1 - z
CHORD 54 II
8I_ I
ZZlllIIIllIiizzZzzzzzzzzzZZ zzzzz
0.9 - 52
I I I J 50 I I I I I
0.7 6 2O _FO 60 80 I00 22 42 62 BE lOE
X PITCH % PITCH
Figure 23.--Continued.
gO
RELAT]UE MACH NUMBER RELA1]VE FLON ANGLE
! .7 -- 60
! ,5 58
I o3 --I II 56
^X]^L ]
I .75 60
]
! .66 68
1.15|
°35 IIx= === ." CHORo^X]AL60"
X 541"56 h.l
1.75
I .66
s+ Izzz
I
1,35
xz 66, X
AXIAL
_ Illllzzi ill lxl"t'x zlZX"x x"xzzZXZXx]
1.15
•
-- CHORD 50
Jr
II I
Illw
0.95
0.75 I
ao
,-17"
_o
..... 60 so
._.1
1oo
_6 I I I I .... I
22 _2 62 82 102
X P]TCH
X PITCH
Figure 23.--Continued.
91
RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
RELATIVE MACH NUMBE_
56
1.75 -
.825 N-9.5
IIIIZITIIIIIIIII
I
,725 _6.5
.6/5
'll IO0
AXIAL
CHORD
X
_5.0
.625
,575
,,Jl,, I
N3.5
_2,0 I I
IIIIIIIITIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I l I
.825 51.0
llllIllllIlIllIlll
- I -IIZIllllllllllll
.776 q-9.6
.725
117 X
_8.0
ttlIi_I II
1111111111111
, ,Ill ,,
AXIAL
.675 CHORD %6.5
- {1111,,j
.625 @6.0
,575 { i I I I _3.5
{ l { { {
m
.825 51.0 -
__IilllllIllllIlllll
I
.775
I
illlIllZI IIlIlllill]
I
.725 _8.0 -- T
z 1I
.675
_ti]I
RELATIVE NACH NUMfiER RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE
1.7 bO --
].5 58
!.3 --IZXzz 56
50. X
z z
AXIAL
z
[I
!.! Zz z CHORD 51. I
z
0.9 59 llilllllli I
1.75 bO
I .56 68
1.35 56
50. X
I I
AXIAL
' [zI
1.15 CHORO 5q"
I
III
0.95 5E
|I
Imo
hqq
B
--
we
mo_.
w
--mm.
9e
eI IIIIIIIIi I ..=..z] I
0.75 I I I I I 50
/ I ZzzzIz'_===='l===" I ..... j
1.75 - 56
61.
52
66. X
AXIAL
CHORD 5O
1.8
Figure 23.--Continued.
91
@ELAIIVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE
1.75 -- 56
IlliiiiilIlilizII
1 .35 52
60, X
AXIAL
IIzmwl CHORD
I .15 50
wl u
0.95 i
I I I l 1].... I _6
I I I I I
0.75
I .75 -- 56
I .65 -- 64"
xt_+_'''+]
!.35 52
65, X I iI IIl
AXIAL I iI
1.15 CHORD 5O
Iz I IIIiiiiiiiiiiiIXIIZ
gl
II #
0.96
I
I I I i ! J q.6
I I I I .....
I
0.75
56 m
I,,,2 m
64" m
52
70. X -- TiiIiZZxIZZZXZI
AXIAL
CHORO 5O _ lli IIIl-
_8
lIiI.iiiIiiillIIlll
0,2
I I I I I 't"6 I J i l i .....
J
0 20 4-0 60 80 1 O0 2 22 4"2 62 82 ! 02
X PITCH X PIICH
Figure 23.--Continued.
92
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE
1.2 56 --
],0 54
0.8 52
t 80. X
IIIIIIIZZ zxzzzzzz_zz]
AX]AL
0,6 CHORD 5O
- iii It
0.'t- 't"8
- _zzzlii IIIII
1.2 5,1. --
- t
I.O
62 -- iliiii IzzzIzzIzzzz'zzz:zzI]
I
0.8 50 -
- iIIlIII
z 90. X
AXIAL
0.6 -- CHORD
$8 IzillIIlIlI
0._ _F6 -
0.2 I I I I I ,+_. I I I I
0 20 _0 60 eO -ZOO 0 20 40 60 80 O0
x PITCH x P]3CH
Figure 23.--Continued.
93
RELAT|VE MACH NUMBER gELATIVE FLOH ANGLE
1.2-- 5_
1.0 52 -hztIzzzH=_=_'=zt!
. =wO_ W_''! o
0.8 5O
]0o x
AX|AL iiiiiiill
IIIIIIIG_]
CHORD 9.8
N6
I I I I I I i J
0.2
1,2
I°0 52
5O ]iliiIiIiiiiiII IIIIIIIIIII
0.8 -- e z t_ uu ||Z X
I I
AK]AL
0.6 CHORD
0.4-
I I I I I I I I I I
0.2
1.2 B 5q-
I.O m 62
m _wg_ _ g u
0.8 u_o"w'mmmwmmZmmm_wm=mcZi]kJmm
m mmmm=._o wi.O_ ._ 1,_w_ 5O tlIIIIIIIIIIlIIIIIIIIHII
]36 X
AXIAL
0._- mr6
I I I I I 9-9-
I I I I I
0.2 90 !!0 ! 30 150
50 70 90 110 130 !50 50 70
X P| ICH x PITCH
Figure 23.--Concluded.
94
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER
RELAT]VE FLOW ANGLE
1,35 -- I 60.5 • z,,
I z I
! .20 -- -. I,. I 56.5 --
l
Z Z Z_
l I
I .05 -- z
I lO.O X
52.5 -- I
PIICH
0.90 -
_g.5 --
z
0.76 --
_F_.E -
z z zZ
I I:
I I
0.60 I II I I I I I II I I I
tFO.5
].35 --
62.5 I
i •Z
I
Z Z z •
l .20 -
58.6
• Z z Z
Z
z
!.05 -
5_.5
z 20. X
PITCH
0.90 -- Z
50.5 z
s z
I
z z
0.76 -- • zz
_6.6 I I I zIi I
zI
O,&O I _2.5 I I I
I .35
62.5 -
I .
• zzz •
1.20
6B.6 - • ,
• zl
] .05 - zl z
5_.5 --
I 30. X
z PIICH
0.90 -- I
z
50.5 --
I I
0.75 -- I z z z I
I
_F6.5 --
I
I I z zzi t
I zI
I Jl t I I I I
0.60
-'00 _2.5 I I I
-q'5 IO 65 120 175 O0 -_5 10 65 120 175
X CHORD
% CHORD
Figure 24.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 40-percent span and near peak efficiency. Broken lines denote location of
blade leading and trailing edges.
95
RELA11VE HACH NUNBER RELATIVE FLOH &NGLE
1.35 -- z 62.5
I • I
z B •
1._0 -- •
. -Y z
• 58.5 -- =Z_z
1.05 -- 54`.5 B
z
_'0. X Z
PIICH Z
0.90 -- 50.5
I
z
i
0.75 --
• =z
_6.5 I zI ZZZZz!
I
I I I J
0.60 4`2.5
1.35 -- 62.5 B
I Z
. I
J
zz z
58.5
I .20 - Z8 • ZZ
Z
• Z z
! .05 -- 5_.5
50. X
Z
PITCH
Z
0.90 -- 50.5
It
• Z
==_ • zz z
4`6.5 ZZzZ j I Z ZI I I
0.75 --
I I
I I I I I I I I
_2.5
0.60
1.35 -- 62.5
I
j,
zZ
I
I .20 -- • z •
68.5
z • zz I
z
Z
I
1.05 - 5_.5
bO. X I
P]1CH
I
0.90 -- 50.5 Z
Z I
z Z
me • Zz
4-6.5 zZzz_ I Z ZI I I
0.75 --
I
I I I I 4`2.5 I I I 1
O.bO 65 120 175
-4`5 0 65 120 175 O0 -4`5 10
-100
X CHORO
X CHORD
Figure 24.--Continued.
-Lk
96
RELAI]VE NACH NUMBER
RELATIVE FLOM ANGLE
!.35 --
62.5 --
• == I
1.20 -
z
58.5 -- • -,L.
I"
] .05 - 5_,5 --
I
z
?O.X
I
P] ICH
0.90 -- 50.5 - I =
z
I
• •z •
0.76 - _6.5 - I IZzz':_ I Z Zii 1
I I
0.60 _E.5 I II I I I I
1,35 62.5 --
I
• z I
I .20 ..¢
68.6 --
Z • i
1.05 5_.5 -
80. X
P] ICH
0.90 50.5 -
I
I Z
I
= • IZZzI I
• zzz
O,7E • 6.5 --
z zz I I
0.60 I I _-2.5 I I I
! .35 62.5 --
I z• I
I .20 I
• . i I 50.5 --
•z
rz I
iI
! .05
1 5_.5 - :Zl
90. X
PITCH
l
0.90
0.?5 --
It, u
• • z z
z
z
50.5
• 6.5
--
--
I
1z
z zzz I
z
I
0.60 I I 1 I _2.s I I I I
-I00 -'1-5 0 65 120 175 - OO -'t5 0 65 120 175
x CHORD X CHORD
Figure 24,--Concluded.
97
REL^I]VE FLOW ANGLE
REL61IVE M&CH NUMBER
62.0
1,25
! .20 I 60.5 iizzZliIll/illUIllIlttIIIIIIIlIIIIIllzZZzZlZZi z
] lIIIII
I, ,Illh IIIIIIIIll
59.0
I. I5 F I_IIIIIIlItII]I IIIIIItIIII_ ' -80, X
AXIAL
CHORD 57.5
.10
66.0
.O6
I I I I, ,1 I I I I I
5_-,5
°00
62.0
60.6
•2 0 i1_]IIIIIIIIiIIIIII_i "_iiIllIIlIIIlIIIIIiiii
] _III II i IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIXlIIIIITI
59.0
-_0, X
•t5 ]--_iiii]iiiIiiiiIIIIIil AXIAL
CHORO 57.5
• I0 --
56.0
.06 -
I I [ I .I
.oo I I I I I 5_.5
62,0 --
,25
56.0
1.05
I I I I I
I I I I .J 5_. s
l .00
eo ,o 60 so !oo _ 2_ *_ 62 02 zo2
X PITCH I PITCH
Figure 25.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 40-percent span and near peak efficiency,
98
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE
.25 62.0 --
I ii
.15 - I 59.0
-IO. X
iII _nzzz_i_ilI_IIIIIIhzzZzIZinzzzmzZzzZ_
AXIAL
.lO _ I iI CHORO 57.5
I]iIiII
.O6 56.0
.00 I l I I I 54.5 I I I I
,25 m
62.0
I iZiiiiiiiZIiIIIIIIZIIlIIIIII
.2O 60.5
_ I flITI
z ÷ I ]]iliz z
.15 59.0
I -5,0 X
I I z_zzlI]I zz,,'zzmZ'z'Z'ZzZ'"",m,
zm,
^WIAL
I
CHORD 51.5
- Iiiii
_
56.0
.00 I I I I I 5_.5 I I I I I
.25 62.0
ZZ Z I
ftlIzzzz
.15 iz zI O.O X
59.0
I AXIAL
-- IzIIZzZIIZZIZZIIIZIzzIzIIIzzIIIIIIZziIi ]
i .10
-If CHORD 57.5
l
1.05 56.0
I .00 I I I l I 5_.5 I I I I I
20 _O 60 80 lO0 2 22 q'2 b2 B2 102
X PIICH X PITCH
Figure 25.--Continued.
99
RELAT]VE NACH NUNBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE
.825 -- q-9.5
.775 ...ILIZzIzIIZIIIZIz
I _8,0
Z
I _6.5
.725
]00 X
AXIAL
.675 CHORD 45,0 --
.626
.575
,II I I I
• 3.E
_2.0
-
--
IIIIItlEIItlIIIIIIItI
.825 D 51 .O
IIIiiIIIIIIiIIIIii
.lib - I _9.5
.725
I
I |I7 X
4B.O
- , :ill
]ttlitltlttlIllllI:]
II . .,.
t AXIAL
CHORD 46.5
.675 :I
.626 _-E.O
.575 I 1 I I I 43.5 . I I I I I
• 825 -- 51.0
.77E __IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITII
.725
I
I
izlZiiiII
IIIIIIIIIII
48.0
- :]L
II 13_ %
AXIAL
I
.675 CHORD _6.5 _IIII:IIIHIIIIIH:I
III{]]III:II:IIIHII
:111
.625 R _5.0
I I I I I I I I I ,,]
.575 43.5
50 ?0 90 liD 130 150 50 70 90 110 1 30 150
% PITCH X PIICH
Figure 25.--Continued.
100
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELAllVE FLOW ANGLE
,825 51.0 --
.775 _9.5 -
-IIIIIIIIIIIIIITIIIIII JlZlillilIZI
z tII IIzzzI-
.725 _
i I
ziII
IBI
AXIAL
X
_8,0
- t
.675 CHORD _6.5
IIIIIllliIlIIIIIlll
Ill ]][/lllI:l:::iillllII
.625 _5.0 --
,5?5 I I I I I _3.5 I I I I I
,825 51.0
iIllIIlllIlIIIIIIIlll
.775 -- L -']IIllllllIllIIIll _9.6
qlll]l
Iv
.725 _f8.O
16BX
AXIAL
.675 CHORD _6.5
.626 q-6.O
.575 I I I I I _3,5 I I I I I
.9O 51.0 --
.85 N-9.6
.80 $8.0
185 X
AX]AL
.?5 CHORD N'6.5
.70 '(-5.0
.65 I I I I I _3.5 I I I I I
50 70 90 I I 0 l 30 150 50 70 90 llO 130 150
X PITCH X P]TCH
Figure 25.--Concluded.
lOI
RELATIVE FLON kNGLE
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER
1.35 - 6O
I •
l =z _.,- i
I 55
1.20 --
"u" ]
• #
• I 5O
l .05 --
I I0.0 X I
PIICH
I •
0.90 q-5 t II Ii
l
Z I II
I '_0
0.75 Z I, t
I l
I Z
I zx z
I II I I I I I
0.60 35
I .35 -- 60 m
1 .20 -- 55
1.05 _ 5O
0.90 -- u
z
II I
l z z
0.75 - u zz X
• • Zz z z •
I ,I 35
I I
0.60
1.35 -- 6O m
i 1 1.1 I
I. 55
] .20 --
i I
,f
I
1 .05 -- • Z 5O
30. X
I
PITCH
x I
0.90 --
1
• I
• i
0.75 -- 90 zz! z
• 1 _l z zz I
I I ] 35 I I I I 1
0.60 175
O0 -q5 1o 65 120 175 O0 -'4-5 0 65 120
X CHORD x CHORD
Figure 26.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 50-percent span and near peak efficiency. Broken lines denote location of
blade leading and trailing edges
102
RELAT]VE NACH NUMBER RELAT]VE FLOH ANGLE
1.35 -- bO -- :1
g
I
1.20 ,r 55
f
.4'
z
1,05 m 5O
q'O. ,1[
PIICH
0.90 't'5
z _z zZ
z
mm z • z
0,75 q'O
I II I I I I J
O.bO 35
6O m
1 .35 --
I
*%
I .20 -- i..- 5G
-r
• z Z
1.05 _z 5O
50, X
PIICH
0.90 -- q'5
w
m • z ZzZ_f z z I_ z zI
0.76 -- 'tO
• • • _t wl
I
I ,I I I I I J
O.bO 35
1.35 -- 60
_F •
I • I
1.20 -- le. 66
1.05 _= • 5O
60. X
PITCH
0.90 -
m zZ : z zZz zI
*z I
0.75 - • • _s n I
I
o.6o I I I J 35
1 I I ,I
O0 -_5 o b5 120 175 -IOO -')s 0 65 120 175
X CHORD x CHORD
Figure 26.--Continued.
103
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELAI]VE FLOH &MGLE
I .35 60 --=
#
I . z I
I
I .20 55 -
• zig
• 11= z •
m
!,05 50 -
70. X
PITCH
0.90 _5 - z
i
z z
===zzx]
0.76
==
= • m= • mZ _0 - I
I
0.60 I I 35 I I I I
1.35 60 --=
I • = I
I .20
I
65 -
t
1.05 r:, 50 --
I
0.90
I
_5 --
I
z,z=j • z f= zl
0.76 I • im 1 u m lug "[ • 0 -- I
i I I
0.60 i il i i I I i i J I
35
I ,35 60 -=
I • , I
1.20 B
• • z'_ ] 56 -
"I
I=
l .05 50 --
I
90. X
I" I
PITCH
I I
]
0.90 _S --
I
I I •
z _ z zI
0,75 i = •Z _0 -- I
I I
I
0.60 I Ji I I I I 35 I II I I I
O0 -_5 I0 65 120 175 - O0 -_5 10 120 175
X CHORD ,t" CHORD
Figure 26.--Concluded.
I04
RELA1]VE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE
.5 6O
iiiiiZiiIIiiiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlIIIIlllIIIiIiI
,q 58
.3 56
-80. X
AX)AL
.2 CHORD 5'1"
.I 52
-'[ZZZ_zzz IIZEZZzZIzIzzzIzIZZZIzZZZIIZZZIIZIzzIIZZz
,0 I I I I I 50
I I I I I
,5 60 --
If,,.IIIlIllIIlIIllZllIizliIi
_.._l II.ZIIIIIIII ZZIi iIZI7
I.'F 68
1.3 56 --
-90. X
AXIAL
1.2 m CHORD 5'F --
1.0 I I I I I 5O
1 I I I I
1.5 60 --
68 _ IlllIIIlllIlllIIIZzizzzi
zZ_znzzzxzzzziZzZZIII x.z
1.3 56
-20, X
aNX] AL
1.2 CHORD 5_
IIIIIIIIIIIIL
1°0 I I I I I 5O I I I I I
0 20 @0 60 80 I O0 2 22 _2 62 B2 102
X P|ICH X P]ICH
Figure 27,--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 50-percent span and near peak efficiency.
I05
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELAIIVE FLOW ANGLE
.5 6O
58
- "IllllttltZlz zz
zZzzzrZiiII t I iZzzzzZlzzzZZZzzzzzzzz
.3 56
-]0. X
kK]AL
.2 CHORD 5q
Zl_Zz. Z
-- I z lZlllz G[ zzxzzz r z zz z l:x x'z z zz xzz
.! 62
zzziiiPLiIII
I ] I I I 5O
I I I I I
.0
• 25 - 6O
.15 - 58
illlzlZZllllZllZt'ZtlllllZZllzllltZZZ - illiZZZznzzzi _
l
l
z
56
ZllllI
I zzzz_=='""'=='===='=====
z
I
• 05 z -B.O X
l
l I AXIAL
IIlIl
0.95 -- CHORO
0,85 --
I I I I 1 5O
I I I I I
0.75
l ._5 -- bO
1.16 -- II 58
zZZlZI[ZZZZlZ=SZ_lZSll ==zzzZlZZlZZZZZzlz
IZzzzzZzz I
z z I
56 -- IzzxZZZZXZXrZZZznzzZZxzx'zz_Xxlx.Zl _
I .05 _[z z z
O.OX
AX ] AL
0.95 CHORD 5_
0.85 52
I I I I I 50 I [ I I
0.75
20 _0 60 80 100 2 22 _2 62 82 l 02
I PIICH X PITCH
Figure 27.--Continued.
106
RELATIVE HACH NUMBER RELAIIVE FLOW ANGLE
.9 q-6.5
.8 'f'f,5
.7 _2.5
I00 x iiiIIIIIIIIIIII
AXIAL
CHORD _0,5
I
,6 .jiii IIIIII
.6 38.5
I 1 I I 1 36.5
.9 - q.7,5
.8 =f6.6 m
.6 39.6
I I I I I I
37.5
• 9 - =1.7,5 D
.8 =1-6.6
iiiiiiiiiii
II]]Iii it
z zZ z zl zz z z_ zzzz'zI[IZzzz
.6 CHORD _1.5
• 5 -- 39.5
I I I I I 37.5 1 I I l J
50 70 90 110 ]30 ]50 50 70 90 IIO 130 150
X PITCH % PITCH
Figure 27.--Continued.
107
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
1.5-- _6 --
AXIAL
0.9 B CHORD _0 --
o g No o_ •
0.7 ,row ,,,_"_ _ _q,m I mz_l[zz.l_z_z#f••_g_l_,B_Ni, 38 --
0.5 I i I I I 36 - i I I I I
1.5 '1"6 --
{.3
I.{
159 X _2 llliiItliiiiiiiiiiiiiilI
AXIkL
0.9 CHORD _0
0.7 38
0,5 I I - t I I 36
I I I I I
|mS -- 't-6 --
!.3 _4
- Hill
1.] q'2
{7T X 5ttit:::h:z{it{:{iIII ttI ]]ItlIItlIIiI{:::
AX]AL
0.7 38
0.5 I 1 I I I 36 I I 1 1 I
5O 70 90 { I0 130 { 50 50 70 90 I lO 130 150
X PITCH X PIICH
Figure 27.--Concluded.
108
RELATIVE NACH NUMfEg RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE
! .35 IZ z
55 -- i
I x=z_X X
1.20
I
50 -- I
I I
!
1.05
:,Lz z
_5 --
Z z
IO.O X
x
Z "1
PITCH
0.90
,d
_0 --
I
i = i zI
O.?E I z
36 Zz Z lr
I
0.60 I II I I I 30 I II 1 I I I
I .20 5O
i[
Z
1.05 _5
0.90 _0
z z I
0.75 35
zZ_ X z
0.60 I II I I J I
3O
1.35 57.5 B
I IZz Zj
][
1.20
I Zz db
52.5
le "
• i_ • z
1.05 -- z q7.5
30. X
Z z ,-,I Z
PITCH
0.90 I z q-2.5
I
z •
0.75 I
•u 37.5 -- I Ix z
I u e m 8 •
z
z z Z z
0.60 I II 1 I I I 32.5 1 II I I I I
O0 -_5 I0 65 120 175 O0 -_5 lO 65 120 175
X CHORO X CHORe
Figure 28.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 60-percent span and near peak efficiency. Broken lines denote location of
blade leading and trailing edges.
109
REL&TIVE MACH MUMBER REL&T]VE FLOW ANGLE
1.35 -- 57.5
I ZZ Z zl
Z zZ ,
I 52.5
I .20 -
I,.
•'t" • ql.5 --
] .05 - z I¢
• 0, X
x ',x •
PITCH Z
0.90 - q'2,5 --
z
0.75 - 37.6 -- • I
m u Z z •
s a qk: : z Z I
32.5 I i I
0.60
m
).35 -- 57,,5
I zzz zl
z
I 52.5
I .20 --
I,,
] .05 --
'T q'7.5
Z
60. X
Z Z Z Z j e_Z z
z P]TCH Z
0.90 --
I q2.5
z
I Z
0.76 --
I D 37.6 Z z •
I
I
I I
I
II I I I I I
0,60 32°5
m
! .35 -- 57.5
I z z][z I I
I 62.6
! .20 --
I°
! .05 -- z _7.5
Z 60. X
z Z
Z K I u • z
P]ICH
I vr2.5
I
0.90 -
I z
I 37.5 z z i i I II Z
i
K
0
.
7
5
I
I
11 I 1 I 32.5 I I J J I
O.bO
-I00 -_5 10 65 120 1?5 O0 - _5 ! 0 65 120 175
X CHORD X CHORO
Figure 28.--Continued.
llO
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
! .35 57.5 --
I zz z I
! .20
I z-.l. '
52.5 -
I
1.05
..t,.
8.7°5 --
zZz ?0. X
I °=
PITCH z
0.90
I Z
8.2.5 --
I
0.76 I
37.5 --
i
Zxxz I x Z i z x
I lu
/
0.60 II I I I ] I
32.5
l .20 57°5 --
zZ z I
Z
I .OE u 62.6 --
z_._
zZI u
;[ I Iz
z
0.90 8.7.5 -
80. X I
PITCH z I
I
0.75 8.2.5 -
• Z '] I I
I I Z
zZ
0.60 37.6 - z I
1
O.q-5 32.5 I II I I I
I .20 - 57.5 --
,j
I I ZZz
I .05 - 62.5 -
Ir z
, r
': ]
I
11¢
0.90 -
I
8.7.5 --
90. X
I
PITCH
I
0.75 -
I
8.2.5 -- ]|
I t T
0.60 -- 37.5 --
I ]Zz=
O. q-5 I II ...I...II I 3a.s I . . i .... 1 I
-I00 -8"5 I0 65 120 175 O0 -8.5 0 65 2O 175
,t' CHORO X CHORD
Figure 28.--Concluded.
111
RELATIVE MACH NUHBER gELAT]VE FLOg ANGLE
F
1,10 60.0
I ,05 57.5
I.O0 55.0
-80. X IllilllllllllllllHiIllillllllEIiIillllIIIIll
iIlllllllllElllIlli]llllllllllI]llllllllllllllll
AXIAL
0.90 60.0
0.85 I I I I I _7,5
I I I I I
E
I.I0 60.0
I .06 67.6
! .00 IlllIllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllIlllllllllllI
55.0 _IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
-_0. X
AXIAL
CHOgO 52.6 --
60,0 --
0.85
I I I I ! 47.5 I I I I I
1.10 - 60.0 -
I ,00 55.0
-20. X
- _ZzzzzzZzzZzzzzznzzzzlXlZiIlliIllIItIIIIIllZlZZ
q]::iiiillill]lllillllI:l::
AXIAL
0.90 50.0
0.85 I I I 1 I _?.s I I I I I
o 20 _o 60 so 1oo z zz _z 6z e2 102
X PITCH % P]ICH
Figure 29.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 60-percent span and near peak efficiency.
112
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE
1.10 60.0 --
iIIIIIIIii
znIL ZI! IIIzz
I .05 57.5
- uzzi III
IIi] .iII
1.00 55.0
-I0. X
_.zZzzzZzZZiiiiiIIIllIIIIZzlzzzzzz_xzv.,,zzz..
tiititiii AXIAL
0.95 CHORD 52.5
0.90 BO.O
0.85 I I I l I I I I I I
q.7.5
1.10 60.0
iiiIIIIlIIIIllzzizzzzizrx
iII III
I .06 -,I I 57.6
I I
I I iIIIIIzIzzz
I
1.00 I I 55.0 - .II ZXZZZz zz_,z
I I -6.0 X zzZiiii zizZ zX=zxzxZzzzzx
I I AXIAL
0.95 CHORD 52.5
IIiiII
0.90 50.0
0.85
1 I I I I q.7.5
I I I I I
1.10 --
iiiiiiIliIiZizizziIiziiizzii z 60 • 0
z 'a
I .05 -- I z 67.5
I z
I
_nIllI
0.95 - I I CHORD 52.5
t I
0.90 -- 50.0
Itli
0.85 I I I I I _7.s l I I I I
20 • 0 6O 80 100 22 _2 62 82 102
X PIICH X PITCH
Figure 29.--Continued.
113
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOM ANGLE
.725 m _-0.0 J ,
_ I 37.5
.675
.625 35.0
]00 X
^X]^L iiz.Xzzzzzzzzz'Zz zIxz'r'xzxzIzz
.575 CHORD 32.5
'i]
.626 30.0
I I I 27.5 J .j. I I I
,_75
• 75 -- _F5.0
*
• ?0 jIIZIZIZIZII'iI _2.6
I IIIIZZIIIZIIIIIIZZIZIIII
• 65 -- _0.0
112X
AXIAL
• 66 -- 35.0
]]]]llliilllllIll
IIIIIIIIII
f I II
.5o I I I I 32.5
I I I
.75 - _5.0 w
.7O
-IIIIIIIIIItlII
t "JlI ILl zzzzzzlzzIzzI zzzlzlil
_2.5
-
.65 _FO.O - I
125 X
AXIAL
t
.60 CHORD 37.5
-itzt[tiiIitlI]
.55 35•0
]itir_zlilizliZZlZIIItll_/I
.so 1 I I I J 32.5
I I I I
so 7o 90 lzo 13o 15o SO 7O 90 110 130 150
X PITCH X PITCH
Figure 29.--Continued.
114
RELATIVE HACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON AMGLE
• 75 -- _5.0
IIIIEIIlIII
• 10 -- - IIIIIIIIII _2.5
] I IIIIIIqIll
• 6s - llliLlli:lllZnZI1 40.0
I38 ,I[
I
.6O AXIAL 37 . 5
CHORO h IIIIIII
III
II
ttlti:zzriiiInInri:
.56
36,0 t
I I I I I 32.5 I I I I I
.5O
.75 -- q-5.0
•
..7
o _ llllilllZIZ_: 40.0 _ :llll
15! X
.6O
AXIAL
CHORO 37.5
,: lt
iIllIIIIll Ilglil
llZzt:z
:
:::II:I:I:III11
.56 36.0
.50 I I I I I 32.5
I I I I I
.75 -- N.5.0
.6B IIlllllllIllll
ll':I:::: _0.0
16q X
AXIAL
.55 35,0
.5O I I I I I 32.5 I I I I ]
50 70 90 ! I0 130 150 50 tO 90 110 130 150
X PIICH X PITCH
Figure 29,--Concluded.
115
RELAT]VE NACH NUHBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
].25 55-_,
I J
1.10
Z
__ • I
0.95
]0.0 X I
Z PITCH
0.80 _ I i 37 --
I
"I
0.66 _ I I
I
0.50 I I I I II 25 I I I
1.25 55z m z
I.lO
I;
q-? --
I • z
= If •
0.95 _-3 --
• q,
20. X z
I
g PITCH
0.80
I 37 --
u
I
0.66 I g
31 --
I m, j t • I
z
X
1,25 ,,_5 = --z
I" .•'k
5,
l .10 1, • 9 --
I"
m " =1 _3 --
0.95 • % 30. X
-I
PITCH
0.80 --
I
37 --
I
z
0.65 --
I
3] --
z
I
3t •
o.so I i I I II I 25
1 I 1 Ti" I
-75 -30 15 60 105 150 75 -30 15 60 105 150
Figure 30.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 70-percent span and near peak efficiency. Broken lines denote location of
blade leading and trailing edges.
116
RELATIVE HACH NUMBER RELA1]VE FLON ANGLE
1.25 -- x
55•
1
l.lO - L
'1"9
.J.
0.95• -. _3
'10. X
Pl TCH
0.80 -- 37
0.65 -- .l 31
Z
I • u •
" 1 Z
0.50 I I Jl I I I1" I
25
1.25 --
55= m
z
I
1.10 -- / _9 r..
L
%
0.95 -- _3
BO. X
PITCH
0.80 - 37
0.66 - "-.J 31 Z
zz_ Z
¢
0.50 I I I 1 I I I If
25
I .25 55• mE
I • • liar I
! .10
I r.
'19 w
%
0.95 B • %
q'3
60. X
u
PITCH
0.80 37
0.65 31 • X
X
I _ z z z
I I I I I I
0.50
75
II I 25 If I
-30 15 60 105 150 75 -30 15 60 105 150
X CHORD X CHORD
Figure 30.--Continued.
117
RELATIVE HACH NUHBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE
1.25 -- 55= z
I
E
"1
I 1"
q'9
1,]0 -- m
,,i
q3
0.95 --. z
I"
I
0°80 --
I 37
I
I z zI
0.66 -- 31 | z
I I_ s z
I II I
0.50 I I I 25
.I
I.I0 -- q-'t -
q-3 --
0.95 --,
z 80. X
'I
P]ICH
0.80 -- 37 --
I I
I
I
0.65 -- 3] --
I_t zl
25 I ! I I lJ
O.50
I .25 -- It
I t I
i,m
I 'k I
1.10 --
I
I
q-3 -
0.95 --, ,..
z ..I
L I ?0, X I
PITCH
I
0.80 - 37 --
I
I 3] --
O.b5 -- I Z
I u •
I II 11 II J 25 I I1 _1. II I
0.50 150
I05 150 75 -30 ]5 60 105
-75 -30 15 60
X CHORD X CHORD
Figure 30.--Concluded.
118
RELAT]UE MACH NUMBER RELAT]VE FLOW ANGLE
57.5 m
I.! 55.0
I_IIIIIIIIIIITIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
HII
I°0 52,5
-]00 X
^X ] ^L
Z Z_I Z_ZZZIz_Zz ZZZZZ ZIZIZIZZIZzIZzIzzZzIZZZ ZZIZZzZZ
0,9 CHORD 50.0
0.8 q'7.6
1 I I I I q5,0
I I i I I
0.7
]w2 -- 57.5
].| m 56.0
IIllllllllllllllllIIIIIllllIIIIIIiiiIIIIiIIiiIIII
],0 m 52.5 m
-80. X
AXIAL
ZIZZ_ZIZ _ ZZZ ZX ZZZzZZIZ _ZIIZZ_I_ZZZZI_z_Z
0,9 -- CHORD 50,0
0,8 -- q/.6
I I I I J q5.0
I I I I I
0.7
|*2 m 57.5 --
I*] m 65.0
ziIiIiZIiIIZIIIIIIIIIiiIIZIiIiIIiIiiiiIIIIZzZiiii
-- 5E.5 m
1.0
-60. X
ZzzzzzzzzZzzZZZzUx_zzZZzxzZZZZ_uzxz_z_ z AX ] AL
0.9 -- CHORD 50.0
O.B -- 'I'7.5
I I I I I _5.o I I I l I
0,7
o 20 ,o 60 so 1oo 2 22 _2 62 B2 IOE
X PitCH X P]TCH
Figure 31.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 70-percent span and near peak efficiency.
119
RELATIVE MAGH NUMBER I_EL^TIVE FLOW ANGLE
1.2-- 57.5
}.l 55.0
zIZiZ zZlllzlziiIiIIIIIIIIIIZZIIIIIIIIIIIIIIZIIZII
l.O 52.5
-erE. X
ZIZzEzZZXXZZZzZ:ZZ_ZZZZZZ:I[ZZZZIzzZZZzZXZIZZ_Zr_X zz Ill X ] _L
0.8 _7o6
0,7 I 1 I I I R.5.O
I I I I I
].2 -- 57.5
].| u 66.0
iizZZzZZZZiZziIZIIIIIzIIIIIiIIII_IIIxIIi1XIiIiZi
1.0 - 52,5
- '1"0. X
z=,===,=,z=zzzzz_zZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzx=zz_zzzxz_z AXI ^l
0.9 - CHORD 50.0
0,8 - 47.6 --
0,7
I I I I I q-5,0
I I I I I
1.2 -- 57,5 -
I.] 65,0
- .iI]iiZiiIzn._
I,._XXzzz"Xx.XZzzx.xzzxzZZzzxZZZZXIIIZIIl
1.0 52,5
ZZ:I'zzzZzZZzZZS_L_zzZZzZIZZzz:zzI:zIIZzII_rIIIIZIZzZZz " _0 ° _'
AX ] AL
0.9 -- CHORO 50.0
0.8 _7.5
O.l 1 I I I I _-5.o I I I I I
20 _o 60 80 IO0 22 _'2 62 82 102
X PI]CH X P]TCH
Figure 3].--Continued.
120
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELAT|VE FLOH ANGLE
1.2 57.5 --
I.} 55,0
illIllIIIZIzx
-- "%z'z_ZZZz_zzzzzzzzZZ CHORoAX
] AL 60,0
0,9
0,8 +7.6
0,7 I I I I I _5,0 I I I I I
!.2 57,5 --
l.l -- EE.O
l,O
-_ZZzziiziiiiiI IIIlzzzz_zzzzzz_zz%zz'''''zz''zx -B, I X 52. B
AXIAL
0.9 -- CHORD 50.0
O.B _t-7.6 --
0,? I I I I I I I I I I
_S,O
1.2 57,6 -
1.1
zzZZ_z 6E • 0
- lllIIi.zi
!.0 iI zzz
zzzzzzzz zx%z=='_..=.,.. 5 2 • 5
I -2.6 X -- ZZZziiZiI
I '_Zxz AXIAL [IIII IIIIzZzzZZZzzZ:zz:zzZZXi
I
0.9 CHORO 50.0
0.8 _7.5
zIzziilZZI
O.1 I l I I I _s,o I 1 I I I
0 20 '_0 60 80 100 EE _E 6E 82 102
X PIICH X PIICH
Figure 3 l.--Continued.
121
RELAT]VE MACH NUMBE_ PEL^T]VE FLOW ANGLE
1.2 -- 57.5 --
1IIII]I
I 1
Z
l.I -- 55.0
I X
I
I
z Z
Z
I.0 -- l zJ[ zz z 52.5
O.O X
W'zl Zz
iI zz ^X]AI
I 1 I I I q.5.0
I I I I I
0.7
1 . 2 -- IILIIZIII 57,5 -
t Z
1.1 -- I x 66.0
iI zzzz
IIIIIiIlli]
1.0 52.5
2.5X
I ",z,
i
z
^X]/_l
ZXzz
0.9 CHORD 50.0
zz
sr I IllZZxxzZ'XzZzzxzzXIZTiiiii]
z
zz _7.5
0.8 I
0.7
I I I I I _5.0
I I I I I
52.5
1"2 F IZZz
I
IIlZz z
SO.O
]I '"",, Z_[II IZ_[IIIZI L
@ zZZZzZZZzz -AIII I
_7.5 III
] • 0 ==r..==...... ?.5 X
18z AXIAL
IZ z
z= CHORD _5.0
_ "]zit
0,8 -- _-2.5
'"'xz,,l]
o.z I I I I _0.0 I I I I
0 20 _0 60 80 100 2 22 'F2 62 82 102
X P]ICH X PIICH
Figure 31 .--Continued.
122
gEL^T]VE MACH NUMBER flEL&TIV( FLON ANGLE
].2 52.5
IlIlli
50.0
ft]....
x
1.1 tX ZZZ
IIIIZIzlZlZzxl
Xz ]I II_zz
z Iii.1
z I-,x z K
1.0 '_7.5 III
]0. X
m_ fill
a= AXIAL
I I I I q O.O
I I I t
0.7
1.2 52.5
1.1 60.0
1.0 _7.5
EO, X
AXIAL
0.9 CHORD q S.0
XxZz=r'=z'r=z=,=====,,zzzZzii
0.8 q-2.6
0.7
I I I q 0.0
1.2 _F8.75
].] _6.26
I.O _3,75
30. X
IX XzZz
AXIAL
====z
0.9 CHORO _1.25
0.8
0.7 I I I I ..I
36.75
36.25
,
0 2O _'0 60 80 ZOO 2 22 q'E 62 8;3 102
X PITCH X PITCH
Figure 3 l.--Continued.
123
RELAT]UE NACH NUHEER gELkTIV[ FLON ANGLE
1.0 _2.5
0.9 _0.0
0.8 37.5
50. X
AX]AL
0.6 32._
0.5 30.0
l,O '+2.5
0.9 _rO.O
0.8 37.5
60. X
....
tt
t] Z Zz acre = =m o= = == ==. =¢e zo ezz¢,== z:= =:z z TZ AXIAL
0.6 Q 32.6
0.5
I i I I 30.0
..... i
1.0 37.5
0.9 36.0
i[1 |
It
0.8 32.5
?O.X
-[I .... -. ,. AXIAL
0,6 27,5
0.5
I I I ....... I 2s.o I I I I ........ J
X PIICH X PIICH
Figure 31.--Continued.
124
RELAIIV[ NACH NUMBER RELAT]UE FLOH ANGLE
1.0 37.5
0.9 35.0
0.8
80. X
32.5 iI
AXIAL
0.7 CHORD 30.0
lli1zIZlZziziizIIII
IIIIlll'IIllllll
0.6 27.6
I
-/I l I I I
.... j
0.5 .+ 25.0
1.0 37.5
0.9 36.0
0.8 32.5
90. X
AX]AL
0.7 CHORD 30.0
||Zz'= ...... T
[1 " "_''='= .......... z= ,|
°+1
0.5 ....
0 20 _0 60 80
T J
1 O0
27.5
25.0
0
'[IiiuzzzZzzZzZzziZzZZizT_tIIItI]/tt]
[
I
20
I
q-O
I
60
I
80
J
100
X PITCH X PITCH
Figure 3 l.--Continued.
125
gELAT]VE MkCH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE
.9 37.5 --
tII]
.8 35.0 --
t
.t 32.5
]0o x
[z e_ =z
AXIAL
,6 CHORD 30.0
,:IrliIlllLII
I]
.6 27.5 --
i zlIIIIIIIII|
III
,? -- 37,5
.8 m 35.0
,III
!lil
e7 -- 32.5 =111
111 x
i,i,
= • • == I lill
ql
i
illt,iii,ii*z:
%I _iiiiiliiII IIIIIIIII
.6 w 27.6
,q
1 I / I I E5,0 I I a .L
• 9 -- 38.75
,8 36.E6
I
il1
.7 33,75
_ I
121X
AXIAL
t
.6 CHORD 31.25
_......... ,. .... • ]]tIi,.=,, ....... •
x x
E8.75
Ii::iz[:iII
lllIIIlll
.5
__ z]_]
."1- I I 1 I _6.25
5O 70 90 110 130 150 50 70 90 1 I0 130 I 50
X PITCH X PITCH
Figure 31.--Continued.
I26
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER
RELAI]VE FLOW ANGLE
.8 38.75 --
.7 36.25 --
.6 33.75 --
132%
xzzzZIi
AXIAL
,5 CHORD 31.25 I
iii:nniIIIIIII111
] II]IiIiiiiiiiiiiiIIII
.q- 28,?6
.3 I I I I I 26.25 I I I I I
5O 70 90 110 130 150 50 70 90 llO 130 150
P]TCH X P|1CH
Figure 3 l.--Concluded.
127
RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE
RELATIVE NACH NUHBER
1.0 --
5!
t
: • lr
0.8 35
I0.0 X
J
PITCH
I 27
0,7 -
J
J 1'9 iz
0.6 -
t IZ z
I
0.5
1 t 11
51 z I • mzzZ
|.0 m
• %
I'x ,, '4"3
0.9 --
• I z
Zz •
Z I
0.8 -- 35
20. X
I
PITCH
"I z
I
0.7 --
I
,t
T
I I
0.6 --
I urn: o
I i I J I I 1
0,5 ll L
_P
u
61 Be E • • •
I
I I"
0.9 m
'1-3 --
• Z
I I
ZZ
z•
• I I
35 --
0.8 --
I 30. X i
z • PITCH
z I 2;' --
I •
0.7 --
I i
u
19 --
I I
0.6 --
I "° I
I I i I 1 1
0.5 ]]
- O0 iO0 150
O0 -50 0 50 100 150 -50 0 50
X CHORO X CHOR0
Figure 32.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 80-percent span and near peak efficiency. Broken lines denote location ot
blade leading and trailing edges.
128
RELATIVE NACH NUHBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
1.0 55 --
I -'1
• z IL_ • •
0.9 I
't7 --
k
z I
z z
0.8 I
39 --
TO. X
I
PITCH I¢
0.7 I
3] --
I
Z
0.6 • 21:
23 -
z t •
I z
48 I
0,5 I I 15 I
1°0 55 --
".1
0.9 m
_7 --
\
Zz zz "z
• z
0.8 B
39 -
50. X
P|TCH It
i
0.7 • z 3] -
0.6 "l" m z
23 --
• qkl •
I Ill I
0.5 I I I I
15
1.0 55 --
I -I I
z_ .
z
% q-7 --
\ I
ltz
I" I" I
z
• Z
0.8 -- z z
39 -
I
60. X
I
P]TCH
0.7 -- I Ii ¢ 3] - I
z I
=T •
0.6 - 23 -- I
I z i Ills'zz
0.5 I I I I I I J I
15
-300 -50 0 50 ] O0 I 50 -10O -50 0 50 100 150
X CHORD X CHORD
Figure 32.--Continued.
129
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE
leo -- 55
I z" ','J
Oe9 -- 'f?
_z z z
• Z
Iz 39
0.8 --
I
z
0.7 -- 31
• I
z
z
0.6 -- 23 • ztZ •
]z z
I l I I
0,5 15
55
,9 -
I z" =-J
z Z
I I q-7
I
I i"
I 1 I
e7 -- 39
BO. X
I • I I I x.
PITCH
I I
e6 --
I
tt m
31
I .]],
I I ,r I
23 • •tZ
x
I I I
I I 1 I I 15
I I I
• 9 -- 55 --
; . I
z
.6 - 'F7 -
39 --
90. X
PITCH
3] --
It•i•
.5 23 --
II I
I I I is I I J
O0 -50 0 50 oo 150 - 00 -50 0 50 00 150
% CHORD X CHOR0
Figure 32.--Concluded.
130
RELATIVE HACH NUMBER RELA1]VE FLOW ANGLE
.875 67.5 --
.800 60.0 -
.725 52.5
-BO. X
AXIAL
.650 CHORD _5.0
.576 37.6
.500 I I I I t 30.0
I I I I I
.875 67.5 --
IIIIIlIIiIIZIIIIIZIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIiIIIIIIiIzIzi
.800 60.0 --
.725 52.5
-_0. X _¢zZ_ZZZ_z_I_Z_ZIIII_I_ZzI_ZZI_
AXIAL
.650 CHORD _5.0
.675 37.5
.500 I I I I I 30.0
I I I I
.875 B
67.5 --
lXXZZlZ_I_rzzzz2ZXXlZZZiZZZZzzl_rztzIzl_iZI_II;
.800 60.0
.725 52.5
-20, X =_,=zzzzI=rm =In z ze==zz=zzzs_zzclz=zzmz=z=sczzzzz'l'=_l'===
AX]AL
.650 CHORD q'5.0
.575 37.5
.500 I l 1 I I 30.0 I I I 1 I
o 2o _o 60 eo 1oo a 2a _a 6a ea !o_
X P]TCH X P]1CH
Figure 33.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 80-percent span and near peak efficiency.
131
RELATIVE HACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
1oO50 -- 67.5
0.975 60.0
0.900 52.5
-10. X
^X]^L
____xxzxz_xxZZZzzzxzzzzZzzzzzzzz_Z_ZZzz:x'"z'" zz=
0.825 CHORD _5.0
0.750 37.E
0.675 I 1 I I I 30.0 I I I I I
1.050 - 67.5
0.975 - 60.0
0.900 52.5
-5.0 I =zzzsarEzzxa_z_'zmms_ % _*%_*_uzz
zIzXZZZ ZZX'zzzz zzz ZZZZZZzzzz ZZZzz
r
^XI^L
0.750 37.E
0.675
I I I I 30.0
I I 1 I I
1.050 - 67.5
60.0
0 • 97 5 - .I ]]III_Z_ZzlZz_zzzzzz
0• 9 oo - J_ =z='==z 52.5
O.OX I IIIlzzzz_z===' _=.,_. I
_'=._ =,==d =zzzz zlzZz KIIIZ I
I tt n'z azhzl] AXIAL
CHORO 45.0
0.750 37.5
0.825 [
o.675 I I I I ] 30.0 I 1 I 1 1
0 20 _0 60 80 I00 ? 22 42 62 82 102
X PITCH X PITCH
Figure 33.--Continued.
132
RELAT]VE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE
.750 37.5 --
.675 30.0
II_Ixzzzzzzz
.600 22.5 xI
Z lOB X
z_zIrIZIZI_zZ_ ZK
AX]AL
.525
-- ZZ[ CHORD 15.0
.'1-60 7.6
.375 I , I I I I I
0.0
.750 37,5 --
IT
.676 30.0
.600
8ZIzIZZIZZ_ z
22.5
J
]09 X
.... ,.=,=-
IIIE,,," AX]AL
.525 CHORD 16.0
-- zII
.q-60 7.6
.750 37.5 --
.676 m
T
I
I
.600 22.5 __ X
.'t50 7.5
.375 I I I I I I I I !
0.0
5O 70 90 llO ]30 ]50 50 70 90 110 130 150
X P]TCH X P]ICH
Figure 33.--Continued.
133
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
.750 37.5
.525
_ == ]TiIz_== CHORD 15,0
'Izz_] 1
._60 7.6
I I I I I 0°0
I I I I 1
,375
.750 -- 37.5
.676 -- 30.0
- zzizillIlIIl
,600 _,======z,,nz Illzz" ............
- tiIIii%==.......-,.-==,izex a2.s
zZZxzzZZZx/i I A X ] ^L
.525
l 1 1 I I 0,0
t I I I I
.375
• 750 -- 37.5 --
.676 30.0
,.,zzzIIIItII
=_z:zZ III
.bOO 22,5 "_¢.xz¢ zx.z Iiz1z_88zma_=_===
1_7 X
"zz'xxxxXZZZxzz - _iIlrz...r---.='-"='"" AX]AL
,_50 7.5
I 1 I I J 0,0 I I I I 1
.375
5O 70 90 110 130 150 5O 70 90 110 130 150
X PITCH X PIlCH
Figure 33.--Concluded.
134
RELATIVE EACH NUMBER RELAIIUE FLOE ANGLE
I .50 -- 70
• zI
t
,r
I °35 -- 66 u
• %
1 ,20 -- 6E --
I0.0 X
PITCH
I
I .05 -- 58 --
0.90 -- 5+ -- Z
0.75 I I 50
! .50 70 --
Z
•1
I .35
I
z I
I 66
z
• ,....
1.20 t 62 -- ]t
20. X
P)TCH
I .05 58
• • I
0.90 6+ -- • i
ii
I I I I I I
0.75 50
1.50 -- 70 -- I
I I . z I
I .35 L_ s I /. I T
z 66
• =I
.,
I "-
I
1 • EO -- 62 -- z
30. X
P]TCH
I .05 -- 58 --
0.90 -- 5or --
• I
0.75 l II l I I i so I II I I I I
-100 -55 -10 35 80 125 - O0 -55 -IO 35 eO 125
X CHORD X CHORD
Figure 34.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at lO-percent span and near stalll Broken lines denote location of blade leading
and trailing edges.
135
RELATIVE HACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE
1.50 B
70 -- • 1
I I
=
• , %-,,,,I • I
I .35 66 -
z |z
1.20 62 --
40, X
[
PITCH
! .05 58 --
z •
0.90 u
E+ --
u
0.75 I I I I I II I I
5O
1.50 7'0 - =
I
z
I .36 I
66
z -,%
1.20 62 -
flO. X
PITCH
] .05 58 --
z •
0.90 ! E4 -
• "T w
0.7'5 I I I I 5O I I
] .50 7'0 --
I
• " I
I .3E • I
66 -
x z
z
l .20 62 --
60. X
PITCH
! .05 58 --
• = Ii ? •
w
0.90 54 -- I
i u
I
0.75 I I I I 50 I II 1 I I I
O0 -55 -10 35 80 125 -lO0 -55 -10 35 80 125
X CHORD X CHORD
Figure 34.--Continued.
136
flELAIIV[ NACH NUMBER REL&T]VE FLOH ANGLE
! .50 -- 7O m
Z
• I
z
z • I
1.35 -- 66
..%
1.20 - 62
_ !
70. X
PITCH
I
1005 -- 58
Z
0
0.90 -- m
5q-
t
II I I 5O I I I
0.75
1.50 - ?0 m
1.36 _ z z 66
1.20 - 62
80. X 1
P]TCH
I I
1.05 - 58 z 8 o 8 •
Z !
Z
0.90 - ° o o 6_
I
o
t t
0.75 5O I I I J
! 050 - ?0 -- Z
I .35 - 66
I 62
1020 -
90. X
I i t
I P]TCH
I 58
I z
1005 - • Z Z ][ Z z
I z I
0090
] m 5_
I I
I • .j I I
0.75
I II I 1 ! 1 50 I IJ I I J I
O0 -55 -10 35 8O 125 O0 -55 -10 35 80 125
X CHORD X CHORD
Figure 34.--Concluded.
137
REL^IIVE MADH NUMBER RELAI]VE FLOW ANGLE
.5 72
.'T 70 D
"-IzZIZzIIIIIIIii zzlZZ
ilillIIIIIIIInzzzzz
.3 ]IIIIiiiiiilZlZZZZZzZZZZzZzzz 68 - i Iz ZZZzzzzzzzzzz
-100 X
AXIAL Zzzzzz_zzzzZ
.2 CHORD 66
,] b_
.0 I I I I I 62
I I I 1 I
,5 72
7O m
"-zzlzzznIllllli ..zzZZiZZ
iilIZIIIIIZz_zzzztxzx
"-IIi _izi_zz If'" I Izxz
,3 -- IIiiizIzIZZL" 68 -_ ilI II zzzzzzz z
-97, X IIZZZzZIZ
kX]&L
.2 CHORD 66
,! 6_
,0 I I I I I 62
I I I I I
.5 72 --
I
7O
-- IxZZiIZIiIIIIIIIIIIII]_i
.2 CHORO 66
.] &at
.0 I 1 I I I 62 I I 1 I I
o 20 ,o 60 so zoo o 20 _o 60 eo zoo
x pinch x pl_c.
Figure 35.--Blade to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at lO-percent span and near stall.
138
RELAT]VE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE
•5 - 72 --
IIIIIIIIl- iiiiII
-- 11 ?0
qlIii zzzz ._IIIIIIIzzz
_ IIIIi_ ZZzzzlxZZzzz
.3 _ tlIiiiiii_zzzzzzzzzZZ 68 I ZZzz
-60. X
I
IzIii
AXIAL
IZzizIiII
,2 CHORD 66
.] 6q
,0 I I I I I &2
I I I I I
•5 - ?2
zzZIZIIzIzzIIIIii
?0
• _ -- iiI II ITII
-]IIZIixii iii
IIIIIIII
'rI
.3 l_zz I'z'zzF IlllIIIill 68 -- X-xx I
-_0, X I
Zzzz z
AX]AL
.2 CHORD 66 -- Izzx'xZX.xXxxx_
x.XiI
1.1 6q"
1,0
I I I I J 62 I I I I I
]*6 -- 72 --
znZ",nzzzIIii iiiIiItZZZI
70 --
1.1
1.0 I I I I I 62 I I I I I
20 _0 60 BO ]00 0 20 _0 60 80 100
X P ] l'CH X PIICH
Figure 35.--Continued.
139
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER _ELAIIVE FLOW ANGLE
.5 72
z:III
?0
-]iI iI
.3 68
Ill?
_ -]0. X I Z
AXIAL
q
I II
CHORD
t
.2 66 Ii
.I 6'_
.0
I I I I I b2 I I I I I
.5 i 72
-] I_ i IIIzzzzIIzznIIzzIIIzIIIIzzIIII 7O
ll]i::
Ill'ill :::'
1,3 68 j :I
-5.0 X I
A](] AL II
.2 CHORD 66
-- IZllizzzllZnztz ZZzlli_lt_rjiIzlllI
.]
,0
I I I I I 62
I I I I I
•5 - 72
_JiiIrIIIIIIIIIi.
°_ r'[,r iiiiiliiiiiiii I i. ?0
.3 lqlJ' -2.6 X
68
:; I
AXIAL
ii I
CHORD I I
.2
IIIzzzzzzI.zzzztZzZIiZIZIZlIiZIIIII
6_
6't
DO -
I I I I I 62 I I I I I
0 20 fl-O 60 80 100 0 20 _0 60 80 100
X PITCH X P]]CH
Figure 35.--Continued.
140
I
RELA1]VE MACH NUHBER gEl&liVE FLON ANGLE
.5 72 --
7O
tti
I
.3 _{if:z:'xlz_ Ill 68 I I
O.OX
AXIAL II I I
.? CHORD 66 _ II I
I ZZ Zll _ 1ZzZlZIlZ_ZZ ZIII Z 3_IlZ :rIll
.! 6_
.0 I I I 1 I 62 I I I I I
,5 72 --
t Iz.IZIIZZzIZIIzzIZZzZzzIZzZZIZZIIIFII 7O
i II
.3 68
2.6X _Ii I
AXIAl.
L
i i
.2 CHORO Ii i
IZZZZZI z-zzXZzIZZZZzzIz_zzzZZzZZZZXZ
,] 64-
1.0
I I I I I 62 -
I I I I I
1.5 ?2 --
l.q- ?0
1.3 68
6.OX
AXIAL
].2 CHORO 66
lzz x
ZZzz zzzZZZ zZ
].1 6_
ZzzzZEZ ]['J[lz:zzz z Z:l[ L-zz zz z:z
]°0 I I I I I 62 I [ I I
0 20 urO 60 80 lO0 0 20 _-0 60 80 O0
X PITCH X PIICH
Figure 35.--Continued.
141
RELATIVE MACH IqUHBEI_ QELATIVE FLOW ANGLE
.5
.3 68 -I
7.5X I
.2
AXIAL
CHORD 66 -_
I i]
t]
l]IlZzzzzzzzZLzXxzz_xzXXzzZxzzzZzX.XI ]I
°1
I
I
o0
I I I 1 I 62 I 1 1 ] I
.5 66
/]Hlll
llZZxXzzZzZzzzzzxZzz_x:zzxZzxzzzxxZ
.dF 6_
.3 62
I0. X
!
AXIAL
I
.2 CHORD 6O ]
.I 68 -I
.0 1 I I 1 I 56 I I I I I
,,5 66
6_" -IZz_'_zenznzzzzz'zz
'zzz_zI
]'In
,ZnIIITZTIITZTzIIIIIIIII
1.3
] 20.
AX I AL
X
62 - '111111
1.2 I ] CHORO 60
I T
Z I
l.l
::ll]llll]lll:
,.t I I I I I
1.0 I I i I I 56
0 20 _0 60 80 I00 0 EO fl-O 60 80 I O0
X PITCH X PITCH
Figure 35.--Continued.
142
RELATIVE MACH NUHSER RELAIIU[ FLOH ANGLE
b6 --_
,
1.3 --
]II]I]HiIIIi[ I
6q" --
I ]Iit]lltttttttzzz,q,
]*2 n
I 62 --
30. X
I AXIAL
il
I I CHORD bO -
l 1 tIIiit]iiiiiIlti]iitlt I
I I
!.0 Ii iI 58 -
llllIiiiIlli IIII
0.9 -- I I I I 1 56 ,-
i I I I
I.l_ M.
66
I e3 --'
6_
I *2 --'
[IlIll 62 lIIIz
I
$0.
AXIAL
1
lt]ii
CHORO 6O
I
I l ZZZzzzzz .,,zzZh
1,0 1
58 IIZliiiZi_Illl" l
%
Ir Z Z ZZzZ ill l.zl lllz z I_zzzI I_JiZlZ
0.9 -- I I I I I I I
56
66 --
1.3 6q-
1.2 62
50. X
AXIAL
I.! CHORO 6O lr
1.0
i '
-- "Ix..
58
zZzzzzl zz z ZZz l_
11111111111111111111111 if
0.9 ._ J I'*..... t='"" "1" -J $6 I ! i I "lJ
0 EO q-O 60 60 100 20 q'O 60 80 ! O0
X PITCH X PITCH
Figure 35.--Continued.
143
gELAIIVE FLOH ANGLE
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER
1°0
lz z
Hi
A
IZzlzlz.ZZlzIIZlZI'
zzzzzZ=
0.8 56
60. X
AXIAL
CHORD 5'I"
0.7
0,6 62
I I I I I 5O
I I I I __1
0,5
1,0
0,8
70. X
5 6 H illIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIzx
AXIAL
0,7 CHORO
0,6
I I I 1 ..I 50 U I I I I __!
0,5
]°0 6O
_ zzzZZ z:zzxxz_II]
0.9 58
_ iiiIzIzzzzTtx
0,,8 56
80. X
AXIAL
CHORD 5_
]i:i::/:: :I
52
I I I I J 50 I I I I I
0.5
0 2O _-0 60 80 100 0 20 q'O 60 80 1 O0
X PIICH X P l "l'CH
Figure 35.--Continued.
r 144
REL^T]VE MACH NUMBER REL_IIVE FLOW ANGLE
I°0 60 --
0.9 58
zllZZZzZllIIlIIIlI I
i II
0,8 56
90. X iIII
AXIAL
0.7 CHORD 5_ IIII
0.6
iti Iz]
6E
0.5 I I I I I 5o I I I I
2O _0 60 80 I00 2O _0 60 8O lO0
X PITCH X P]ICH
Figure 35.--Continued.
145
gELAIlVE MACH NUMBE_ gELATIV£ FLOW ANGLE
1.2-- 60 --
1.0 B 58 --
--1 llllil
I IiII II
0.8 56 --
Izl]IIIIIllII_T_I ]
Ioo %
"]
AXI^L iii IIII
0.6 I CHORO
tII
0e_"
0.2
m
I I I 1 J
62
so
! I l
ILl',
II:
I I
].2 -- 6O
1.0 68
0.8 56
-...=II 123 X
4IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIi]IiiillliI]
I _TIIIIIIIIIIIII
^XI_L
0.6 CHORO S_
_
0.4 62
I I I I J 50 I I I I I
0,2
50 70 90 I I0 130 150 5O 70 90 110 130 150
,X P]ICH X PITCH
Figure 35.--Concluded.
146
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
|
1.35 _ I
= I0 • 67.5 = • zl
z z •
I .20 6'1".0 - L
". I,_
1.05 I I 10.0 X
60.5 - I "
I I
PITCH
0.90 o o 57.0 - I l
0.75 63.5 --
,t
I •
• zz •
I
0.60 I I i I I 50.0 I I I _z
1.35 m •
67.5 --,
z z z'l
• !
z
1 .20 m
6_.0 --
1.05 60.5 -
I =
I 20. X
I
PITCH
0.90 I II
57.0 --
• u
e
I
0.76 T . • m e° •
53.6 -- I z
I I z
1" •
z zz Z
0.60 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I
50.0
! .05 -- 60.5 - I •
30. X
I
PITCH I
0.90 -- 52.0 - I •
gm• I •
o
0.75 -- T i u •
i
I •
53.5 --
Zz z
I I Z •
Z
0.60 I I I [ J I I I I I I ="
50.0
- O0 20 80
-q'O lq'O 200 -I00 -_-0 20 80 I_-0 200
X CHORD X CHORD
Figure 36.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 20-percent span and near stall. Broken lines denote location of blade leading
and trailing edges.
147
RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER
67.5 zs
1.35 --
@Z
1.20 -- 6S.O
@
60.5
1.05 --
Z
57.0 z
0.90 --
•eg
• s •w ZZZ@
63.6
0.76 -- z-
I I 1 I i I I
50.0
0.60
m 67.5 -i Z
].35 z
I
Z
Z Z Jl
6q.O
!.20
%
Z
60.5
1.05
50. %
I
P]TCH
57.0
0.90 m B
z
i m
zZ Zz
53.6 Z
0.76
I J I I I iz'_f
0.60
I I 50.0
67.5
1.35 -- z z
sr
_m I
z
z z 6q.O
1.20 --
z
Ii
60.5
I .05 -- 60. X I
z PITCH
I z
57.0
0.90 --
-=g I
ZEmzZ z
53.5 B I
0.75 -
I
Z
I II I I •• !
0.60 I I I ,I 50.o
200 O0 -_0 20 80 I _0 20O
- ' O0 - _0 2O 80 I'+0
X CHORD
X CHORD
Figure 36.--Continued.
148
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOM ANGLE
1.35 67,5 _ .
Z
• I
1 °20
Z Z
I
6_.0 --
I ',%
1.05 60.5 -- 1
70. X
PITCH
0.90 57.0 --
e I
go I
_u I I IZl z
• i
0,,76 53.6 --
T
I Z
0.60 I I I I I I J I I
50,0
1.35 -z z 67.5 -
I
Iz I
].20 - • I
6q.O --
1.05 -- 60.5 -
80. X
Z
PIICH
0.90 - 57.0 --
u•
!
• i
i IIIIIII |
• •m
0.75 -- 53.5 -
0.60 I I I 1 50.0 I I
I,I
I .35 -- 67.5 -
Z Z
z z z k
U z
I
Z
I .20 -
:If 6_.0 -
• I
I .05 -- I , 60.5 --
90. X
I
PITCH
0.90 --
i •
Z 57.0 --
I z,,.. i
I • mm
0.75 -- I 53.5 --
I
0.60 I l 1 1 I 5o.o I I I I
- O0 -_0 20 80 1_-0 200 - O0 -_0 20 80 14F0 200
X CHORD X CHORD
Figure 36.--Concluded.
149
RELAIIVE NACH NUNfiER RELAIIVE FLOH ANGLE
.38 -- 69.0
o 67.5
3a - zzZzzZznZZzzZ
! - ,.IiiiiilIiiIiizi,
I xl "III
63.0
I I I I I 61 .5
I I I I I
.O8
F
.30 m 69.0
_nnIzZzZZIzzIz£'
.32 67.5
- izlZZ-- aI] zZZZZZZZz. iiil
[ L[;I!
1.26 66.0
-'FO. X -- [IIxiiiz I iII
]IlZiIiiIII]]Ig lIIlz z AXIAL
IIIi _]
I .20 CHORD 6q'.5
zZlZzzzzzliiI I
l.lq" 63.0
I ,08
I I I I ] 61.5
I I I I I
1.38 69.0 -
__InIIIIZ'IlI'IIII]] lzlzil
1.32 67.5
iIIIIIzlzzzz
l .26
ii zzzzz 66.0
-20. X - lI ZZZzz
- ttlIt:tziff:n AXIAL
I
1.20 CHORO 6_.5 IIIIZrxlr.rll
- I
rXzZZ_zIZZIzzII[
I.I'F 63.0
I I I I I 6I.s I I I 1 I
! .08
ao ,o 6o 8o Ioo 2 aa _e 6a Ba fOE
X PITCH X PITCH
Figure 37.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 20-percent span and near stall.
150
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE
.38 B 69.0
IIIl_
.32 67.5
]] iiiiIIIII IIIIIIzIzIzIIIIzI lllllIz
l :II
.26 II r1 66.0
I
• 20 -- Illliiz/z' CHORO 6_.S - I
I IlllllIIIIIllIEzXZIzzx.xx.x
,iz_[I
63.0
I I I I I I I I I I
.08 61.5
• 38 -- 69.0
iizIiZZzZZIII
I
.32 -- 67.5
iiiiiiiiiiIIIIIllz - i]II:
I i÷ I
I 66.0 -I z
1.26 --] -B.O X I
iI I
AXIAL
I
- Illp ,, CHORO 6q.5 --] II
zz,
L IIIzII I£I ZI IIZIIIZZ ZZz_Z:ZzZzZZ
1.1'_ - 63.0
I I I I 61 .s I I I I I
1.oe I
m
1.38 69.0
I .32 6?.B £
. ii.iiII IIIzI ]
I
I iitl x iiizixZZiiizIiIiiiI
_I
I .26 / 1]] 0,0 X
66.0
i t
AXIAL
I
I .20 ]]]I III CHORO 6q.5
- Izi I I
IIlIllIIIIziliizr.z/z,. II
1.14 63.0 - --ZZZzz_zZ:ZzZzZZ
t I l I I J
61.5
I I I 1
I .08
2 22 _2 62 B2 102
0 20 _0 60 80 100
X PITCH % PIICH
Figure 37.--Continued.
151
RELATIVE NACH NUHBER RELHTIUE FLOH kNGI[
53.5
iiiiiIiZiiZiiII
IIIIIIIzIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
.68 52.0
IO0 X
II
AXIAL
II
.62 CHORD 50.5
.56 _9.0
,,50 I I 1 I I _7.5 I I I I I
m
.775 55.0 B
.716
Z 63.6
] I
.655 I _ IIIIIIiI
52.0
12] X
I
^X]HL
.595 CHORD 50.5
.536 m
q'9.0
._75
I I z I I I I 1 I I I
_7.5
.8O 55.0 --
zz:zzzzzzzZZ zzzzZ z_ zZzz.z
IZZZZzzzzzz:zzzzzzzzz
Z
[ I 53.5
zzt
t]]
.68 52.0
1_1X I htII
-IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIKIIII II_III
AX]AL
.62 CHORD 50.5
.56 '_9.0
.5O I I I I I I I I I I
'+7.5
5O 70 90 llO ] 30 I 50 5O 70 90 l 10 130 ] 50
X PI]CH X PIICH
Figure 37.--Continued.
152
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE /LOW ANGLE
.8O 55.0 -
ZZ][ZZZzzzZZZZzzZZZTZZIz z [ZZZZzZIzZZzIIZZZI
z I
53,5
z I
zXI
m
.68 52.0
]6] X l]]ili:li: :uzilnzz:
AXIAL II:IIllIIllllIIlllzllIll
m
.62 CHORD 50,5
.56 _9.0
,5O I I I I I $7.5
I I I I J
z I
.7_ -- 53.6 --
.68 52.0
]81X
AXIAL _Izmzzz:ZZZ:I:fl:EIIIIII]:[IIIIEEIN:IlZz:::
.62 CHORO 50.5
.56 ¢'9.0 --
.5O I I I I I 'F7.5
I I I I I
• 90 -- 55.0 --
.8_ 63.5
izZI[iizzzzIIZzzIIIIZzI
.78 --
l
z
iII Ixz:zzxzxIIIzzII
52.0
::tltl
20] X
I I
ziiI AXIAL I II]IIiziiz:::lii]
I
.72 CHORO 50.5 _IEIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
II
,66 _9.0
.bO I I I I I _z.s I I I I I
50 70 90 llO 130 150 50 70 90 I lO 130 150
X PITCH X PITCH
Figure 37.--Concluded.
153
RELAT]VE NACH NUMBER RELA1]VE FLOH ANGLE
I .35 65.0 --
• • Z
z
,, I_. "z I
t
i .20 61.5 --
/
].05 m
58.0 --
I
I
I 0.0 X iI
P]ICH
0.90 _ I 'I 5_.5 --
_
I
I
]
0.76 51.0 --
I I Illzz
0.60
I I 1 I I q7.5 I 1 I
! .35 65.0 z
•I "I
1.20 • T 61 .6
1.05 58.0 --
I
20. X I
D
P]ICH I
0.90 5q.5 --
0.75 ZSI
51.0 --
z z
I I II I II
0.60 I _7.5 I I I _Z
I I
I .35 -- 65,0 - z
Z |
• z[
z zJ
] .20 --xz 61.6 -
%
1.05 -- 5B.0 --
30. X Z
P]TCH
*'o °
0.90 -- 5_.5 --
• ml 'n •E
0.75 -- 51.0 -- •Z
I
xz I Ix z
I I I I 1 I I I I I I I zlz
0.60 '_7.5
-I00 -_0 20 80 I'eO 200 OO -_o ao so ]'_.o aDO
X CHORD X CHORD
Figure 38.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 30-percent span and near stall. Broken lines denote location of blade leading
and trailing edges.
154
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
1.35 65.0 -t •
• " I
I
z
I .20 z ZZ
" I
-ix 61.5 --
'r.
]o05 58.0 --
I
I •
0.90 wwI
5'e.5 --
I
w
n o
I .
0.75 T ° -
51.0 -- l
l I z•j I III
0.60 i i I J 47.5 I I I I I I z zj z
1.05 58.0 --
60. X
PIICH
0.90 54.5 --
_u
0°75 T w m lm I •
51.0 -- Z z
I I I
IZ I
0,60 I I I 1 I 47.5 J I I Zlz
j
!.20 -zz • 61.6 %
I
1.05 - 58.0
60. X
PITCH
Z
0.90 -- 54.5
w m
m
Z
m.
i
I
I iI z
0.60 I I I I J I 47.5 I I I I I zp
-I00 -`t0 20 80 140 200 - I O0 -40 20 80 1 'tO 200
X CHORO ,¢ CHORO
Figure 38.--Continued.
155
REL&]IVE FLON &NGLE
RELAIIVE HACH NUHBER
65.0
1.35 --
• .,P = I
• I
! .2o -# 61.5
1.05 -- 58.0
70. X
Z
PIICH
g 5_.5
0.90 --
z •
_u
• z z
• l= •
0.76 -- 61.0
I I I I I q7.5
I I
0.60
65.0
1.35 -
• -4.
I[
I
• I
1.20 61.5
Z
I, z
58.0
1.05 --
80. X I
Z PITCH
5q.5
0.90 --
• =, El •
Z I
0.76 --
T • ill z z
61.0
Z
I
I Z[
I I I I I q7.5
I I I ;
0.60
65.0 z
1.35 --
M I
I1=
I
z •
I I • I
61.5
] .20 - Z
k | I
58.0
1.05 -- 90. X ii
PITCH
I I I
5_.5
0.90 -- I
I I i I
I == .'1 • i
=
z•
51.0
I I tIz''
0.75 --
I I I
I I I I I 1 I _7.5 I t I I zz z Ili
0.60 20 80 1_o 20o
-_0 20 80 l _0 200 O0 -qo
-]00
X CHORO % CHORO
Figure 38.--Concluded.
156
REL&TIVE HACH NUMBE_ RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE
66.5
].3 65.0
-_IIIIIIIIIIIzIIIIIIIIIIIiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii]iiIIIIII
],2 63 I 5
IIZIIIzIIzIIIIIzIzIIIIIIIzIzzIIIIIIzIZZZIIIIZI - I O0 ,I_
---ILl
AXIAL
].O 60.6
J I I I I 59.0 I I I I I
0,9
66,5
1.3 66.0
-- iiiiiiiiIiIiZziZiiIiiii
I
iiiiiiIIIIIIII IIIIIIiiiIi
IZIZZIIZZIIIZIIIII 63 • 5
1.2 "IIIzzzIzzIIIIzZZXIzIIxZzZzXlXZI -80. I
^X]^L
I.O 60.6
I I I I I 59.0 I I I I I
0,9
66.5
1.3 65.0
IiillllllillIllllllIIllIIIIIziiiiiIiriiiiIiiiiilI
__,.ZZIIzIIIIZzIIT,
1,2 ._iIzIZIzziiZiIiIiiiIIiiIIIILZ*_ "'ZIzz 63.5
-76. X
AXIAL
1,0 60.5
0,9 I I I 1 I 59.0 I I I I I
20 _0 60 80 100 20 _0 60 80 100
X PIICH X PITCH
Figure 39.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 30-percent span and near stall.
157
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELAIIVE FLOW ANGLE
66.5 --
].3 m 65.0
iIzzIi I i]iIl IlIIIEIIzIIlIzI
IzzZZIzzzz z
ZZZIZ ZZz 1
ZI z I _ ZZZzzzzzzzzZIZIIItIIIl
1.2 -- Z IZzZZ EZ IIIT.I U ZZZ Z:Z fiZZ I 63.5
-60. X
AXIAL
].] CHORO 62.0
].0 60.6
0.9 I I I I I 59,0 I I I I I
].=F 66.5 -
1.3 66.0
IIItIIlIIIllzIIIIIIIIII .I
__ iizziZZIZZZI IZIZI IzIZZZZZzZZIzIiI
1.2 63.5
ZiiZlZzzzIII ZIII -- IZxii I iI] I1
-40, ,¥
AXIAL IzIzIzzzxiZIII
1.1 CHORD 62.0
1.0 60.6
0.9 I I I I I 59.0 I I I I I
66.5 --
1.3 65.0
1.0 60.5
0._ I I I I I 5_,.o I I I I I
0 2O _'0 60 BO [DO 20 '_0 60 80 l O0
X PI1CH X PIICH
Figure 39.--Continued.
158
RELAT]V[ NACH NUMBER RELATIUE FLOH ANGLE
l.i- 66.5 --
1.3 65.0
JZz z zcZZ_ZZZZZz zzzZ z¢z ¢zzzz ¢zZ
11 ZZ z
I
1.2
-- I iI 63.5 _ iIIIIzl
-]0. X T] Iz
IIiiiIiIIx AX ] AL I II
l.I I zl
CHORD 62,0
iI z_h,u ,
ZIZI I Z IZZIZZZIZZzCZZZ z
1.0 60.6 i
0,9 I l I l l 59,0 J I I I ;
1.'t 66.5 --
1,3 n
66.0 --
z vIll_
1.2 - z
I 63.5
I I
-5.] X - it III
AXIAL
I.] _ ltlIIZZZ
CHORD 62.0 -- II
I I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIz_IIIIIIIIIIIIIII_[I
I.O 60.5 m
0,9 I I I I l l l i I
59.0
1,'1- 66,5 --
1.3 66.0 m
z
ij[ zzZ z zzZZ zz z zz zzzZZl¢z zzzzz zZSZzzzz Z
IIz
z z
1.2 - I 63,5
i I -2.6 X -I II
I
_IiIII;
AXIAL I
l.I CHORD 62.0
IIzzZzzzzzzzz,..z,.,_.zzzzzlzz_,_,zzzzzzili
1.0 60.5 i
0,9 I I I I I 59.0 I I I I I
0 2O _0 60 80 100 0 20 '_0 60 80 l O0
X P]TCH X P] I'CH
Figure 39.--Continued.
159
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE
66.5
1.3 65.0
-- zzz_[ xzz zz zzz Zzzz z zzzz z zz z_zzzz zl XL'ZZz Z I
1Z Z
1.2 --
I
I
I O,OX
63.5 I] ]
tI z I
I3] Ax z^L
CHORD 62.0
l.I -- Iz ]
IIzzzzzzzzzzZzzzz_nzzZZJ z ][
zzz z zz z_.__r..zZI
1.0 60,6
i I I I I I 59.o I I I I I
0.9
],e t -- 66,5
1.3 66.0
-- EzZZXZzZZZZZEzZzzZZZzzZ_zZZZZIZZZZZZz
IZ Z
].2 63.5
2.6 X
AXIAL I
_ II CHORO 62.0
1.1
1,0 60.5
O,q
I I I I J 59,0
|g_. -- 62.0
-zzz,'-,zzz,.,.,,,_, • HI
!.3 60.5
_ zzzZZ IczZZ_[Z_Z zz zZ zZlzz ZzZ zZz zz zz zzzI[z Z
- --z ,,.,,z,_,z,,z,,zz_[]]tt
Z 59.0
1.2
5,0 X
Z
AXIAL
I CHORO 57,5
1.1
IIll
1,0 56,0
I I I l J 5_.5 I I I I J
0.9 0 20 q'O bO BO I O0
2O _O bO 80 ] O0
% P] l'CH X PllCH
Figure 39.--Continued.
160
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELAT]VE FLOH ANGLE
1.4 62.0 --
]ZZZzzzzzZX
1.3 -- rx =zzz• zlxZzZZr_t •
ttI
zzZZZ z • zxrZZ_XXZZxz
bO. 5 -- zz=zzzzzZZZzZZzZzzzZZZzzZZi I
1.2
l 59.0
_ _ttt
7.5X
AXIAL
].1 CHORO 57.5
z,IIIiiI
l.O 56.0 --
0.9 I I I I I 5_.5 I I I I I
1.4 62.0 --
1.3
, HI
zzzzzLZzZZZZZZzzzXz_zzzzZ2zZZZzzz
60.6
* "*' *, _r,,,t ,HI
z
1.2 Z 59.0
IO. X
z AXIAL
1.] CHORO 57.5
I.O 66.0
0.9 I I I I I I I 1 /I
5q,5
I.q 62.0 --
1.3 60.5
_]_zZZXZzzzzzZZz_Zzzzz
l¢ ][zzzzzzzxzzzzzz:ZXXZxzz
1.2 l¢ 59.0
20. X
X AXIAL
z'
1.I CHORO 57.5
- ='",,iz,,,tttlt]]t]t
]
1.0
0.9 I I I
zhzzzzz,zzt]
1
I
I
56.0
5'f.5 I I I I '
0 20 '_0 60 80 IO0 0 20 =tO 60 gO l O0
X PI1CH Jr PITCH
Figure 39.--Continued.
161
REL^I]VE MACH NUMBER _ELATIVE FLOW ANGLE
7"
1 °35 58.25
TTIII]II]T I
0.96
==
I I I _l 50.75
I I I I I
0,85
1.2
I.I 66.0
1.0
xx
=l AXIAL
q-O• X 5q'. 5 ITIIZIzziiziiiiIZziziIiizIIiiii
0.9
CHORD 53,0 4, I
1.2 m 55.0
I.I -- 59.5
I,O -- hz 52,0 -
50. X
AXIAL
0.8 -- I _9.0 --
O.l ....
I I I I .I '+7.5 I I I I ..I
0 20 _0 60 80 I00 0 20 q-O 60 80 O0
X PIICH P]TCH
Figure 39.--Continued.
162
RELAI|V[ MACH NUMBER IqELATIV[ FLOW ANGLE
].2 55.0 --
1.! 53.5 --
].0
0,9
+
] fix=
m=
%
.++
60.
AXIAL
,t"
52.0 --
IIizztzHZtlijliiiiillllIIlIlllIIIIIII]I
CHORO 50.5 --
J %%1 === %
0.8 '_9.0 --
'I
0.7 I I I I ._I _7.5 I I I I
1,0 55.0 -
IZ]l
0.9 63.6 -
=mlllqllll1==I¢ll I% = %
0.7
',I AXIAL
CHORD 50.5 -
iiiiiTiiiIililiIliiIIII;IU |
0.6 ¢'9,0 -
].0 55,0 -
0.8 m
80.
AX I AL
X
52,0 --
t ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,t]i
0.7 CHORD 50.5
=I
0.6 q-9.0
[iiiiiiii IIIIIII1
0.5 I I 1 I q7.5 I I I 1 J
0 20 qO 60 80 O0 0 20 qO 60 80 ] O0
X PITCH X PITCH
Figure 39.--Continued.
163
RELAIIVE MACH NUMBER RELAIIVE FLOW ANGLE
Io0-- 52.5
_ "IIIIIIIllIIIlllI]
0.9 51 .0
_ lliiIllIllIIIlll
Im|mm tm u&s I i I _. tl z w| mvm n |meeomme
0,8 '+9.5
90. X
AXIAL
CHORD 48.0 -- iilllIIIII
0,7
a Z
0.6 t$6. 5 --
Figure 39.--Continued.
164
_ELAT]UE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE
1.0 52.5 --
]iliiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIZI]]
0.9 5] .0 --
0.8 iIiiiiI]IIIIIIII
_?.5
-_ =1=== -I!!1 Ii ._=_=i
0.6 _6.6
-- eZI
II i I
0.5 I I I I I I I
'(-5.0
1,0 52.5 -
0.9 61 .0
0.8
I 18 X
ZZZl=ZlZlZZlll=r.z z z================= A X ] kt
Iz
zllZ z
0.7 CHORD '1-8.0
• ]
8Zlt
0.6 _6.6
0.5 I I I I I '+5.0 I I I I I
].0 52.5
0.9 51.0
i ill
0.8 _9,5
138X
411111111111111111111111
{[]i]Illll
IIIII
III
zZZZZz_IZZ_I_Zzz_I zz zzzzzzzz='=zzzzzzz= A X IA L
0.7 CHORD 48.0 m
=I
z Z
0.6 _6.5
0.5 I I I I I es.o 1 I I I I
5O 70 90 110 130 150 5O 70 90 1 ]0 130 I 50
X PITCH ,t' PITCH
Figure 39.--Continued.
165
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER I:;'ELAIIVE FLOW ANGLE
I.O-- 52.5
0.9 51 .0
0.8 --
{67X
_9.5 - , [.]IIiIIIIIIIIIi,
I
ZZZIZXI_IZ'ZlIII'ZZlIKZZZ z ZI lzlzI'zIIzlzzIIIIz _ X ] PtL tIItiiillIiilitlt]itlil_ _1:
0.7 _ I CHORD f18.O
Zzzl I
0o6 -- '16.6
I 1 I I I _5.o { I I 1 I
0.5
leo - 52.5
0.9 -- 61.0
0.8 --
166 X
_?,5 - ll]]:iii::::I:
zzzzzzzZzzzZZzZ:Zzzzxzzx z z zxr'zzzzzzz:zszzzzz AX ] AL ]IllIII]l:iliiiii]lllll
I
0.7 _ ZXziiXI CHORD _f8. O
0.6 -- *+6.5
I I I I I _s.o I I I I I
0.5
leo m 52.5
0.9 51 .O
0.8 q9.5
xzzzzzzzzzxzXZZlzZzZxz x zzZ#SZzzZZz=zxx:xz { 76 X
z AXIAL
0.6 _6.5
I I I I I '+5.o I I I I I
0,5
50 70 90 110 130 150 50 70 90 1 lO 130 150
X PITCH X PITCH
Figure 39.--Continued.
166
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER @ELA]]VE FLOW ANGLE
1.0 52.5 --
0.9 51 .0
- _i]ii
1
0.8 -- tfg.5
195X
zI'IzI_ILzI:[ZIZXzZIIXIz
Zzz z _
lzzZZZZzxzzzzxzZ A X J AL
_tiIttttittIltttt]]ttI
lit I]It_It_t_
0.7 -- ZZxzzZ CHORO I+8, 0
0.6 q'6.6
0,,5 I I I I I q-5.0 I 1 I I I
].0 52,5 --
0.9 61 .0
- .IIItL
0.8 -- R.9.5
206 X
zzzzzlzzzZZzzzlzZzZzzlzl zl zzlxlz'zzzllzzz ^X!AL - I_ 'fill
I] I
0.7 zzZZxzXI CHORO q'8 • 0 _iiiliii]iiiiiiIiillllll
I 11llIIIll
0.6 _6.6
0.5 I I I I I _5.o I J J I J
50 70 90 ] I0 130 150 50 70 90 llO 130 150
X P]'ICH X PITCH
Figure 39.--Concluded.
167
RELAllVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE
] .35 63.25 . == =
i •
,r" 59,75 --
i .20
z •
i t =Z _,=,•
1.05
I I0.0
PITCH
X
56.25 -
]
_ I z 52.75 -
0,90
I
I
z I
I
I
0o76 _ I = I _9.25 - I
B I
I
I
0.60 I I I I • 5.7s I I
z
I °35 z 63.25 -- • z=
I= zZl
! .20 z
.l,- 59.76 --
J
zl 1%,
1.05
I 56,25 --
I I
20. X
I
PITCH
0.90
I 52.75 --
I z
z
m •
0.76
I • 9.26 --
m I
I
I
1 I I J +s.?s I I
0,60
-- z z
I .35 - 63.25 I
I
=, • •1
1.20 -- 69.75
• I %.
I
1.05 -- 56.25
30. X
PITCH
0.90 -- 52.75
X
I I
Z
0.75 -- _-9.25
0.60 I I 't-5.75 i I I I
-I00 -50 0 50 O0 150 O0 -50 0 50 O0 150
X CHORD ,,_CHORD
Figure 40.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 40-percent span and near stall. Broken lines denote location of blade leadi,
and trailing edges.
168
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE
1,20
I
59.75 --
z z z
z x
%
m
-- z
1.05 56.25 --
_0. X
m PITCH
0.90 52.75 -
m
I :1¢ I' •
0.76 _9.25 - I
I
0.60 I 45.75
I I I
1.35 63.25 -- • • = • z
I
I .20 59.75 --
,I
z
• z
%
Z
1.05 56.25 --
z GO. X
PITCH
m z
0.90 52.75 --
m
m z
m z lr Z
m
0.76 • m 49.25 -- I
I
0.60 I 45.75 I
I z
I .20 D z 59.76
z • z
-%
1.05 56.25
60. X
z PITCH
0.90 52.75
m
0.75 49.25 I
I
0.60 I J 45.75 I 1 I I I
O0 -50 O 50 100 150 O0 -50 0 5O 100 150
X CHORD X CHORD
Figure 40.--Continued.
169
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE fLON ANGLE
6
1.35 -- 63.25 m • •
z-
I z I
1
1.20 -- 59.75
z iz
u Kz 3'
Jz 56.25 I
1,05 --
70, X
J, I
PIICH
J Zo 52.75
0.90 --
z
I - o z
0.75 --
j m
q9.25 I
I
J
0.60 J J I q5.75
0,60 I I I I I _5.75
I I I
1,35 -- 63.25 -- • • z z
I I
"4 • j
1.20 -- 69.76 --
""_z
!.05 --
ii 90, X
PITCH
56.25 --
i
I
'[1
0.90 -- 52./5 --
, t,I
I
I
z
z
I
0.75 -- • 9.25 -
I
0.60 1 I l I _s.75 1 I I
- O0 -50 O" 50 oo 150 00 -50 o 50 IOO 150
X CHORD X CHORD
Figure 40.--Concluded.
170
RELATIVE NACH NUHBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE
! .25 6_-
LII.IIIItIHIIIIIIIIIIHIIIHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
1
I,20 63 -- I • I
1.15 62
-00, X
IIIIII_III_IIIIIIIIIIIIIHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII2[III AXIAL
.10 -- CHORD 61
.06 6o
.00 I I I I I 59 I I I I I
,25 6_
I_II,llllllllllllIIl
- -I
.2O 63 L_ ltlIil ill _
- I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIi
.15
_ iiiiI
62 _ IIIIIIIiiiiitIitIIr_
-40, X
AXIkL
°I0 _IIiiillllIilll lI CHORD 61
llIiill
.O6 60
.00 i I I I i 59 I I i I I
.25 6T --
.20 63 --
IZZlllllil ill
lllll_I1_z_I
iilIIIIIIIlll
.15 _ III II 62 m
iI_ lilt
I
-20. X
I iii
I AXIAL
CHORD
II
.10 61
- I1 ill
I - IIll tz
I
_ IiiiIIII
.05 6O
IIIii
.OO I 1 J I I s_ I 1 I I
ao ,o 60 eo !oo 2 22 ,a 6a oa I02
X PIICH X PllCH
Figure 41.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 40-percent span and near stall.
171
RELAIIVE NACH HUMBER RELAIIVE FLOW ANGLE
1.25 - 63
iiiIlIIIIIIlllIi
iI Ill
I llilI'IIti
I .20 - 62
l
] IIZll I
61
_ I It
1.15 iiI tI -I0, X
t :
I AXIAL
1.10 -- CHORD 6O
I it
1.06 -- 69 tt hzzzanzzzz:izl:llll
I
::z::iIlIl f lt Izz
I I I I I 58
i I I 1 l
.00
,25
]iiIIIIIIIIIIlIIIIIIIiilliiiii
.2O m
I III
I
_ tt
o15 t -6,1X ft][[tI]tI]5
lI t AXIkL
CHORD
.I0
:] :
.06
s,_ t ZzzlzIzIzzIIznZzIqZIIIllItlllttI]
1.00 . I I I I I se I I I I
1.275 61.5
I
I .226 60.6
] tlizZZZZZnzIZnznzzzzzz_IIIlIiiiiii
59.5
1.175
-t ] 0.0 X
t AXIAL - l::zz:zzzz:mn:zzzmzzzziiilllllllIll]
1 ,125 CHORO 58.5
1.075 57.5
I I I I I s6.s I I I I I
1.025
20 qO 60 BO I00 22 _2 62 82 102
X PIlCH X PllCH
Figure 41 .--Continued.
172
RELATIVE HAOH NUMBER RELAI]VE FLOW ANGLE
.85
I
.;'5 50,5
!16 X
AXIAL
.70 CHORD _9.5
.66
.6O 1 1 1 1 l
45.6
• z.5
111
--
I I I J
,85 52.5
iiziiiIiiIzIIIZZIIIZIII
.80 _ I Iiiizizz,tz_rIZZzZZZI 6! .5
I
.75
,ii 133
AXIAL
X
50.5
IIIII IlIIIiII
ilIIIlIIlllllllll]iiillI
.7O
.66 _8.6
CHORO _9.5 f
.60 I I I I I _7.5
I I I I I
.85 B
52.5
zzZzzzzzznZzzZznZrZZz
z
.80 61.6
-- I T] IIiIZzzZzzzZzZZZZ
.75
IIII
I 160 X
50,5
AXIAL
.7O CHORD _9.5
.(,5 't8o5
.b0 I I I I I ,,7.5 I I I I I
50 lO 90 I10 130 150 50 tO 90 ! !0 130 150
X PIICH X P] TCH
Figure 41 .--Concluded.
173
RELAT|VE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
62.5 m
I •
I
r-. 57,5 m
1,2 - ,%=
I
. i
i.O -- 52.5
]0.0 X
PITCH
0.8
I - q-7.5
I
m
• II
0.6
I
I
I _2,6
t
I I L I ='" } J
0.'t- 37.5
1ell. --
62.5
I ,'1
1.2 --
£.. 67.6
,!
mR,
J
P u
• zI
!.0 52.5
20. %
"t
PITCH
I q'7.5
0.8 -- D
I
t ]
0.6 - X
q.2.6
I I
I I I I • I 1
0.aP 37.5
62.5 u
I .= . •t
1.2 --
¢ 57.5
=l
m
'1" t
].0 -- 52.5
0.8 --
q'7.5 z
0.6 -- q2.5 • = t
I = t"
| z
1 I I I 37.5 I I " I J
0.'t
00 -50 O 50 IO0 150 - O0 -50 0 50 I00 150
X CHORD X CHORD
Figure 42.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 50-percent span and near stall. Broken lines denote location of blade leadin
and trailing edges.
174
RELATIVE NACH NUHBER RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE
62,5 --
I : " ,I
].2 m
..,,.'. .I
57.5 -
.I".
i •
1.0 52,5 -
I "
_0. X
I
P]TCH z
0.8 '1"7.5 --
I
I *
0.6 I _u, _ w _ u
_2,6 -- I x Z • I
z
z z •
I I
0,4 I I I I I
37.5
].q. m
62,5 --
I
|e2 B
-t",
w 67.S -
• m m
I.O -- 52,5 -
50, X
i
PITCH
u
,B z
0.8 - • u _l-/. S --
z
u
• Z
0.6 -- q'2.6 -- I Z • Z
z
I z
0,_ I I I 3;,.s I I
|.q-
62.5 -
I
1.2 --
E/.E -
I z
u
• u
l z
j o u •
0.6 -- • 2.5 -- z Z I I Z Z Z
z
I - I
0,_- I I I I 37.5 I I I
- 00 -50 0 50 O0 150 DO -50 0 5O lO0 ]50
X CHORD ,1[' CHORD
Figure 42.--Continued.
175
RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE
RELAT]VE HACH NUHBER
62.5
|oer --
I - I
I
57,5
1.2 --
II 52°5
].0 -- Z
70. X
I"
PIICH
I _7 • 5 t.
0.6 --
I I
• i z I
II
i I • I
I _2.6 z
0,,6 m z
I
I I I I I
37,,5
O.Or
m
62,5
I,,_" m
I I
I I
57.5
1.2 --
",j
i 52.5
1.0 xt
C
=,,I
=f7.S I
0.8 - I • X ,=, •
I
I
m •
iI I I
I _ e,w
'F2.5 I
0.6 - I
I
I 1 I 37.5
O.=F
62.5
|°mf B
I I
I I
57.5
1.2 --
"1 3
52,5
1.0 -
I
'_7,5
0.8 --
I I
I _2.5
0.6 t,
I Ii I I I I I I i I
I I I I I I I I I
37.5
O.=F O0 -50 O 50 lO0 150
-tOO -50 0 50 lOO 150
X CHORO
X CHORD
Figure 42.--Concluded.
176
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER
RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
].2--
68 --
1.]
61- B
52
I I I I I I I I I I
'1"8
].2 --
68 --
I.I
64"
-- ZZ ][:z z Z:zzzZZZ Z][zzzzZzcZzZzz_[Z][Z
52
I I I I I
1.e - J I I I J
1.2 --
68 --
] . | -- ZZZ, x"_zx'Zz_:zz_z'ZxXzX:ZZZxzz
61. --
Z Z
Z
x z zx
].0
6 0 - zzzx'xx'xz_z:":zzx=
-- ZZE ZZZz Z ]._r TxzZZ Z':[ -]0. X
Zz
AXIAL
0.9
CHORO 56 ...,v'" Zzzzll_,_ **_llzzmssmfz z
0.e -
52 --
0.7 - I I I I J 1.8 - I I I I
0 I
ao 1.o 60 eo 1oo o ao 1.o 60 eo IO0
X PITCH X PITCH
Figure 43.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach humor and flow angle at 50-_rcent span and near stall.
177
RELAIIVE FLOW ANGLE
RELAI]VE HACH NUMBER
68
1.25
zzzIIZzIIZIzzIZ
xzx z II
Iz I 6_
1.15
iI I;
I z
I z
I .05 - iI zi 60 - iiIIIZzzzr.,,
I -S,O X
zz _XI_L
II C.oRO 56 I I Izzr'_I_zzzz:zzI:I[IIzz_zIIZ:ZIzzzzzZZ
0.95
zzII zxz x
52
0.86
I I I I I
I I I I I _8
0.75
68
1.25 -- zIzZZII.IZIIII/II
zz I'ZZi z
zzZ Z
6q"
I .15 ]I z Zz
I
] zz
1.05 -- Z
zI
]I o.o ^X ] AL
6O
iii]
_ "" zZ '_z z:: :zz n _ s zz z'zzzz zxz zz" IIlI I
Izzii I CHORO 56
0.95
62
0.85
I I 1 1 q-e I I I I .I
0.75 100
100 _0 20 '_0 60 80
0 20 _FO 60 8O
X PI1CH
X PIICH
Figure 43.--Continued.
178
RELATIVE NACH NUHSER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
1.0 --
0.9 q-q
_lzZZllZl Ilzlilll
0.8 qO -zzlzzzzzIIiIIIlIII]III]]' t z Zrz
I00 X
_XIAL
0.7 CHORD 36
zZ_zzzZzzzzzZzlzZzzz wz icz •
0.6 _ zzzz 32
-- tt] z..,.,......,..,,_.,,. ' "
0.5 I I I I I 28 I I I I I
1.0 m
q-8
iiilzl zllllllllllll
0.8 q-O
119 X
AXIAL
0.7 B CHORD 36
0,,5 28 I I I I I
1,,0 't8 --
0.8
129 X
- , II
z÷
AXIAL
0.7 CHORO 36
z zz z xz Zz z xzzZ Z ZX Z_[ Z ZZT'x Z
zz z._zzjzzsz=z'zz
0.6 I ix z= 32
ZliI
0.5 I I I I I _e I I I I I
50 70 90 II0 130 150 50 70 90 110 130 150
X PITCH I PITCH
Figure 43.--Continued.
179
RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE
RELATIVE HACH NUMBER
1.0 -- _8
0.9 --
-zzzzn_dznzzzIIiIIIIlgl
IIIlll]zzzr_Zanz
IIII
0.8 -- q-O
I$8 X
AXIAL
CHORD
0.7 --
0•6 -- rlli
I I I I I I I I I
0.5 I 28
1.0 D
q-8
0.8 q-0
159 X
AXIAL
0.? 36
z_,_zzZ_zzZzxzzzZzZ_zzzzz_iiizzz_ZZZ_x CHORD
0.6 32
I I I I l I I I I I
0.5 28
70 90 i IO 130 ] 50 5O 70 90 110 130 150
5O
X P] "[CH
X PITCH
Figure 43.--Concluded.
180
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER
RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
1=_" --
6?
I
u xm u
|e2 --
56
_ " '_1
I ,%
1.0 - I "
5O
• m • • ) 10.0 X
PITCH t z
0.6 - J z Z
J ,,= z
I z
0.,6 - I I I
I i u
• B
•m
38
z ]
z
O.'T I II I 11 I I II
32 L
|Dot
62
° • w /
I
1.2 k. 66
u
I
I
I
1.0 - • " z_ i
5O I
• "• .'1 20, X
Q
PITCH
I
0.8 - I o
't-'1- ]I II
I I
0.6 - I
38 • z [
I I= z
o._ I II I "11 I
I I I
62
I
=° •J
Io2 --
F
66
1.0 - !
u m o
° 5O
•1 30. X
PITCH
0.8 - I "
z tI
0.6 -- I -.1 Z Z
zZlI
I J e • = •Z
O._F 1 II I I I !
DD -t5 I0 65 32 I I I I I
12D 175
-IDO -=1.5 lO 65 12D 175
X CHORD
X CHORD
Figure 44.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 60-percent span and near stall. Broken lines denote location of blade leading
and trailing edges.
181
RELATIVE FLObl ANGLE
RELAT]VE HACH NUHBER
62
]._
xe K Iw J
I
'1
I, 56 i. m
i.2 I',.
J.
. "1; I -
5O
1.0 q0. X I
PITCH
I
I w _r
0.8
I
u I
_w
g I
I 38 I
0.6 m
B Z I " I
I
I 1 I II l I I .]
O.er
I II 32
62 --
].4" B
I
• Im, zZ ..I
'I
I 56 --
1.2 --
1.0 --
. "1" 50 - z
50. X D
• u _ g
P]TCH
1 ". q-4. --
0.8 --
z
I " zzK Z z •
Z
• I
I 38 --
0.6 -- • m •
I
I ]
I II I 1 1 32 I
0._
62
I
• •s n - I
I E6
1.2
"r.
I
m • u
r 5O
1.0 60. X
• o ° I-
m PIICH
I-°
0.8
I - I • z z
z
i I ]
i X z I
I
0.6 g -. 38
I I
I
II I I I J
I [I I I 1 32 175
0._ O0 -q-5 IO 65 120
-_5 10 65 120 175
O0
X CHORD
X CHOR0
Figure 44 --Continued
182
RELATIUE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
I.q- m 62
I Bz u • J
I .d
1.2 -- 56
.,,I
1.0 -- m
"L 50
I"
Z
I. I
I',,. I
0,8 -- 99
I - I • Z x
o
I ". 38
I X_ Z X •
z
z
7
0.6 -- _ _ _ _g ° m Z
om
I I I I
I II I I I I I I1 I I I I
0,+ 3E
|.9 m 62 -- u
u
I
I ,I
1.2 -- 56 -
I
Z
1.O -- • m z 50 -- I
l, 80. X
I, t
PllCH
0,8 -- I q-9 -- Z
I • zZ
I
x_Z z z x z
0.6 -- I m m •• •_ 38 - Z l
I I
I II I I I I 3E I I I I I
0.9
1°9 B 6E
I z • • I
I E6
1.2 --
I 'i
50
I
I.O --
90, X
t
m
PITCH
I
0.8 - 99
I I
II x
Z
0.6 --
I • • e • 0o 38 I t" z I
I I
I II .I _" I I 32
I II ..I 1 I
0.9 l-O 65
-I00 -_s Io 65 120 175 00 -_5 120 175
X CHORD _' CHORD
Figure 44.--Concluded.
183
RELATIVE HACH NUHBER _ELAT]VE FLOH ANGLE
1.0 65 --
Z1"zzxzzz ¢]cz "Y zz xzzz Ll"z
• z zz:zzz x zzzzz ZzzZ i X_Z.,ZzZ:Zzz Zx
0.9 62
0.8 59
-BO. ,1[
AXIhL
0.7 CHORD 56
0.6 53
0.5 I I I I I 5O
I I I 1 I
1.2 65 -
I.I 62 B
!.0 59
zzx_ZZzzzZ_Z_ZZ_z_zzz -_0. X
z_zzZzZZzZ_x_ _Zzz
_X]AL
0.9 -- CHORD 56
0.8 63
0.7 I I I I I 5O I I I 1 I
1.2 65 --
].1 D
62 m
zz'ZZZZxzzz zz.zzzZZ:zz
__ ZZ Z ZZ
1.0 59 Tz zz x,ZZZZz:zZxz x'zzzx z'zzxz z:zzX'zX'Xzz::zx..z
Z Z
-20. X
xx.zx zzZZ z xZZZzZ:xzxzrzz
ZZzz_zzZzzzzl_ AXIAL
0.9 CHORQ 56
0.8 53
0.7 I I I I I 50 ] I I ] I
ao _0 60 eo zoo e aa _a 6a ea 102
X P]TCH X PITCH
Figure 45.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flo_ angle at 60-_rcent span and near s_ll.
184
RELATIVE NACH NUHBER RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE
].E -- 65 --
].] 62
- zxzzzz=,_,,,,,,,z
zZ Z zz z
Z •
Z Z -- zzzXZzz/ZXzzz:zr "Zz,,z
].0 59
-- Z Zz
-]0o X iZ 2Z ZZz
^X]AL
ZZZzzzzxxxxzxzxzxzZZ zzzZ z,,
0.9 CHORD 56 -- ZZZzzzzzzzZZZZZ
0.8 53
0.7 I I I I I 50 I I I I I
].2 65 --
1.1 _ _zzzzzzzZZzzz 62
zzZZ zzz_ ZZzz
Z •
Z zz
1.0 -- Z 59 - ./HI.
Z ZZ -5. ] X
I
zI.zz AX ] *4L -I III "IZZzz z
..zzliZlI llll CHORD
0.9 56
El ZzzzxzzzzzzzxXZXzz.. ZZzzzZZ/Tlii
0.8 63
0,7 I I I I I 5O
I I I I I
K
1.2 (,5
1.1 62
f ,zz_ZzrZzzzzzzZz
_ iz;zz zZZZZZz
1.0 59
-2.6 X
lllliIl
I ZZZz
IIIIHHI AXIAL
ttll]ItlIz,,zzz,,,,z,,,z,,,,,,_,,,nzzzr, zizzzz
I
0.9 CHORD 56
0.8 53
0.7 I I I I J 50 1 I I 1 I
0 EO _0 60 80 I00 2 22 q'2 62 B2 I02
X PITCH X PITCH
Figure 45.--Continued.
185
RELAT]_E HACH NUHBER RELA]IYE FLOH ANGLE
_2
- I
,,6 39
--xZ:[zZ'ZzZZzZZZzzzZZZZ z
.5 36
-- Iz]
100 X
_-
AXIAL
CHORO 33
.3 3O
27
I I ] l/ I J
.2
,? vr8.5
_6.5
_2,5
112 X I
AXIAL iiiiIIlIIl_i
CHORD 39.5 iiiIIIH
fill 1
36.6
I I I I I 33.5
I I
.2
.7
.6 --ZzzzZZZzzZZzZZZ_zZZzZZ_z z
,, _
q'8 -- 11]I
-- z'z" x itiIzx zzzxr'zr'zx
.5 ,_s - ]
'it] 1 125X I
AX]AL I
.ur CHORD q-2 --
zzzzI11lllllllllIllllIlill
.3 39 --
.2 I I I I I 36 J I I
5O ?0 90 110 13O I 50 50 70 90 I I0 130 150
X PIICH X PITCH
Figure 45.--Continued.
186
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER gELAIIVE FLON AMGLE
.9 51 --
.8 IF6
.7 '1"5
]_0 X
AXIAL
.6 _8_ZZZZ zz_z_Izz ZZzz z CHORD '1"2 - it
.6 _ z_I?_Z_"'_"
39
I I I I I 36
J i , , I, j
.9 51 --
.8 IF8 --
.7 IF5 --
161X
AXIAL
.6 CHORD
--_ I1 z II ILIIS Z Zli,l ZZZ ZI[ Z lZ ZI Z ZZ ZZ Ill,l[ i[
Z zzZzz
.6 _ zzZzzzW_
I I I I I s6 I I I I I I[IIIlZZll
.4
.9 5] --
.8 _8
.7 IF5 m
16q'X
AXIAL
.6 '('2
,xzz-_zzx'_'=zz=zz'zzx=z zz zZZXZzZXllllllllllZZZZ x CHORD
.5 39
.IF I I I I I 36
1 1 1 1 1
50 70 90 1 lO 130 150 50 70 90 llO 130 150
X PIICH X PITCH
Figure 45.--Concluded,
187
RELATIVE HACH NUHBER RELAI|U£ FLDH ANGLE
1.25 60 -
;¢
It
I L,.
1.10 53 --
I
I I
0.95
!
q6 --
IO.O X
P]_CH
39 -
I
I z
I 32 --
I
0.50 I II 1 25 I II
1.25 -- 60 -
z
1.10 --
t 63 -
T
•=
0.95 -- • 6 -
20. X
• • u* = ZI
PIICH
0.80 --
I 39 -
I
J
o
0.66 - I 3E -
I
o m Z
0.50 I II I I 25
I I i 4w J I
! .25 - 60 --
• i _ Ii1= II
I.lO -
I
53 -
1
,s IF
%
0.95 -
I" _6 -
30. X
PITCH
0.80 -
I - 39 - z
I
°°
0.65 -- 32 -
I Z
0.50 I II i I" I 25 I I
OO -55 -I0 35 80 125 OO -55 -10 35 80 125
% CHORD X CHORD
Figure 46.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 70-percent span and near stall. Broken lines denote location of blade leading
and trailing edges,
188
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE
I .25 60 --
I • u m • i: [
t "I
l.IO 53 --
-I r-.
0.95 _ r'. q6 --
I
TO, X
• m ue I i I
PITCH
0.80 _ I 39 --
I
w
I I
w
0.65 _ I u _
32 -- I
I lr
m •
0.50 I II I 25 I II I
I .25 60 -
I o q .I
1.10
I J
53 -
4 r-.
0.95
I-
't-6 -
I,
0.80
io
39 -
I u
0.66 I 32 - z
I
I z z
0.50 II i _5 I I I I I
I .25 60 --
I
1.10
I
53 -
0.95 q6 --
I"
• C 60. X
I •
PITCH
I- I .
39 --
I . I
I I
• m 32 --
z I
I I I
0.50 I II I "l-i j 25 I I1 I [ I I
-100 -55 -10 35 80 125 -IO0 -55 -IO 35 80 I 25
X CHORD X CHORD
Figure 46.--Continued.
189
RELklIVE NACH NUNBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
I .25 60 --
I
1.10
I
53 -
I
0.95 ,.,I I-
_6 --
70. X
: • T= I •
PIICH
0.80 39 --
I z
i" I z
• w
0.66
I u
32 -- I •
z
I[
_r I
I I I
0.50 II "I. 25 I II I 1 I
I .05 60 --
I .. . t
z
0.90 m
I
53 --
I
0.75
I i=
q-6 --
-I I 80. X I'I
P]TCH
0.60 - I ,st, 99 --
I
• f I
• Z
O.q-5 "1 32 --
I 11" I
I I I
0.30 ! I 25
I II I I
I .05 - 60 -
I
0.90 - 63 -
Ii
0.75 -
Iz
_6 -
0.60 -- 39 -
O.'f5 -- 32 --
X CHORD .¢ CHORD
Figure 46.--Concluded.
190
RELATIVE HACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
].? 66.5 --
].i 63.0
1.0 -- 59.5
-]00 X
][Z][ZZZ:I[ZzZ ZZ ZZZ ZZ Z ZI[ZZ ][ZZ EZZzZi[ZZZ I[ZzZZZZz_z_q
AX]AL
0.9 -- CHORD 56.0
Z zZX_ zzz_tzzzz_z _zxz zz_zZz_Z_| _z_Z
0,8 52.5
0.7 I I I I I q9.0 I I I I I
1.2 66.5 --
1.] 63.0
l.O - 59.5
-80. Jr
AX]AL [][ZZZz:z Z_ Z ]CZ zZz Z:Z Z:Z Z ZZ zZZ ZZ£ZZ ZlZZ zZ][ Z]iZZ3 ZZZZzzZ
0,8 62.6
0.7 I I I I I 49.0 I I I I I
1.2 66.5 --
].] 63.0
I.O -- 59.5 n
-60. X
AXIAL Z3[Z_ ZZZ ZZ Z ZZ ZZzZ:Z ZZZZZ Z_ Z ZZZ2 ZZZ zZZ I_ZZzz:I[ zZZ _ _
0.8 52.5
0.? I I ! I I ,,.9.0 I I I I I
0 20 ,¢-0 60 eo zDO 2 22 _z 62 ez zoz
x PZ'rCH X P]'IC.
Figure 47.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 70-percent span and near stall.
191
RELA1]VE HACH NUNBER RELAT|VE FLOH ANGLE
]*2 m
66.5
],! -- 63,0
1,,0 -- 59,5 m
-H.. X
AX]^L ZZ Z:Z z zz ]r.z z ¢z ]_z I[l[zz:xZzzz:z:zzz Z'_zzZZ_[z I_rzz z Z]zZZ_
0.8 62,,6
I I I I .I J I I I J
0,7 _t9.0
]*2
66,5
1.1 -- 63.0
1,0 -- 59.5
-q'O. ,I[
AX]AL zzz2 z Z_ ZZ z:I:z Zl[ zZ:ZZZzZZZzz ZZ ][z zZz ZZ Z Z,Z Z_ Z ZZtzzzzZ'J[
0.8 -- 52.6
I I I I J ,_9,o 1 I I I J
0.7
1.2 66,5
!.1
].0
0.9
E .ZXxzz=ztx== z.,zZZZzz zzzzz=:zzzz
-20.
kCHORD
X| k L
X
63.0
59.5
$6.0
Z].ZZZZZzzzzZZzZZZZZZZZzzzZ_ZZZZZZZZZZzZzzZZZzz2_
0.8 52.5
I I I I J _9.o I I I I I,
0.7 t02
o 20 _o 60 so 1oo 2 22 _2 62 82
X PITCH X PIICH
Figure 47,--Continued.
192
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
1.2 66.5 --
1.1 63.0 --
zzzZzzz3zlz
1.0 - zz ZZz 5 9,5
z Xzzz - ] O, X
z z zZ z z Z z Z Z"x Z ZZ ][ZZ z..,xzz x X.,z
0.9 zzlZ zz Ax ] AL z-zx z zz
ZZ_zzz CHORD 56.0 zz Z
I[¢ZZZ:IzZzTZZZZ
ZZZzzzzzZZzZZZZZZ
0.8 52.5
0,? I I I I I qg.o I I I I I
],2 66.5 --
I.! 63.0
zzZZZZzZzXz, zz
Z
1,0 Z ZZZZZ 59.5 D
-5.1X
Z •
Z z AXIAL _zzIIIZlZZZzzz
0.9 CHORD 56.0 m Z
zz zz
|Z Zzzzzz_rZzzz x zz Zz
zXZxZ ZII
_ZlZz ZjZ zz
0°8 zZzzzzZXZZXlll J,
62.6
0,7 I I I I I I I I I I
q'9,0
1,2 66.5 -
1.I 63.0
ZZZIzTIrzZZzI[
I •
I
].0 m
59,5
iz -2.6 X itllIz ,
ZZZz AXIAL
Z
0°9 CHORD 56.0
Zzlr
illII _x",%z" _zzzzZ
_
IZZzz_zlZlZZZZZllZIZ
0.8 52.5
0,? • I I I I I ,_9.o I I I I I
2O q'O 60 80 !00 2 22 42 62 82 102
X P]TCH X PITCH
Figure 47.--Continued.
/
193
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE
1.2 66.5
iiIIZIIi
Z
I
I,] Z 63.0
zZZ z
II
Zzzzz
x 59.5
1,0 I! 0,0 X
Z AXIAL
0,9 tI •z
CHORD 56.0
0.8 62.6
I I I I ] _9,0
I I I i J
0.7
1,2 m 59.5
_ ilZaZZzzzz
Iol 66.0
zz 2.5 X
52.5 "* _iziiiIIIII]
II
AXIAL
0.9
zz_Izz_iiIi|
t] CHORO q.9.0
0.8 _6.5
I I I I q2.0
I I I I ' I
O.t
1.25 59.5
iiIIllzz
1.15 56.0
l .05 52.5
B.O X
AXIAL
_ zz88_llnsLzzzz
0.95 CHORD _9.0
Zzzl
0.85 -- Z q5.5 --
zzILIlt
I I I I .I _2.o I I I I
0.75
20 q'O 60 80 O0 2 22 _2 62 82
X PITCH X PIICH
Figure47.--Continued.
]94
RELATIVE HACH MUNBER RELAT]VE FLON ANGLE
_Z
1,2 2 59.5
z
z
!.] 56.0 1-
z
0.9 "z z
I[ z
zz AXIcHORDT.AL
6 .1[ °r9,0 ,,_,._z_..x.xz_z:XZXzzrzlxzZZZIl[ '
l z z
m
0,8 45.5
0.7 I I ..I I I I I ._ I
42.0
I.I 59.5 --
I.O 56.0 --
0,9 52.5 --
Zl[ lO. X
% AXIAL
==
0.8 I z CHORD 49.0 -
Iii
II I
"=%%Zdl]
0.7 45.5 -
0,6 I I I I
42.0
],1 59.5
l.O 66.0
0.9 52.5
20. X
- AXIAL
0.8 -- mm CHORD 49.0
mmim
0*7 --
45.5
0.6 ---
I I I J ....... J
42.0
0 20 q'o 60 80 l O0 22 42 62 82 ! 02
X PIICH X PIICH
Figure 47.--Continued.
195
RELAT]V[ HACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
q R.0 --
].0 -- qS. 5 -
36.0 -
0"7110.8 lz..,. "''"'.. .... . ._..,zt
q'9.0 -
1.0 -- _6.6 -
0.9 -- _2.0 -
_O, X
AXIAL
0.7 -- I'-,,--.......
.....---..,.... .]]I] 36,0 -
I I I I 31.5
I I I I ..... J
0.6 .....
....
_9.0 --
].| --
_.0 -- q'G.G --
0.? -- 42.0 -
50. X
AXl AL
0.7 --
Z ¢zz
I
z'zzs asrlz=,,
0.6 -o 20 qO 60 80 I00 2 22 q2 62 82 l 02
X PITCH X P]TCH
Figure 47,--Continued.
196
RELAT]VE MACH NUMBER RELfiIIVE FLON ANGLE
.8
.7 38.5
35.0 I
l_Zl:zzlzl_ ae m a_m =zajlzw_zZ m_ Z.jI_z _
J
.6 -- Z Z 3].5
60. X
Z IIIIIIZIzzL_r_ZZIIlII IIIIIITIITTII]
AXIAL
.5
,] CHORO 28.0
.q. m
2_.6
.3 I I I J ....... )
21.0 ! I I I I ........ J
.8 38.5 --
.7 36.0 -
.6 3].5 -
70. X _iiiiIiiliiiiI IIIIIIIIIIlIII|
Z ZZZzzzzZzzzzzzzz_zlZZzZllzsszz _
AXIAL
.5 CHORD 28.0 - ]iiI IIu
.q.
*t 2_.5 -
.8 38.5 --
.7 35.0
,6 3].5
co. x - iiiiIIt]Iii ]
]z_Uw_ltmlzzslzzzzzzzzZlzzzzzzZzzz
AXIAL
Z
.5 CHORD 28.0
z
-I ,z'zzzzzzzzzzz] Ill
.4 24.5
lz'='='"_rZ I
.3 I I | I , .... ! 21 .o I I I I| ...... I
0 20 _0 60 80 I00 2 22 q2 62 82 ! 02
X PIICH X P| I'CH
Figure 47.--Continued.
197
RELATIVE FLOM ANGLE
RELAT]VE MACH NUMBER
38.5
,8
.7 35.0
.6 31.5
90. X
AXIAL
CHORD 28.0
.5
_]Z== _' "_ %0_ Rz s z_s ZZZzZ L.ZIZzZz Z zZZZz zm
2_.6
I I I I .... J 21.0
.3 0 20 q'O 60 BO 1 O0
"0 2O _0 bO 80 ]00
X PI1CH
X PIICH
Figure 47.--Continued.
198
RELAT]VE HACH NUHBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
• G -- _O.E5
w7 -- 36.75
.6 33.25
]OOX
zzzZzzX-zxxlzlzZlr, z
i_ z"=zt'zzzzzx_z ^ X ] AL
CHORD 29.75
]iZIIllllllllllllll
II
.5 -- Z
8]
rlllIlllll
.q. -- 26.25
[ilZZZzzP
I I , I I I I i I I
.3 22.75
i,]1
• 8 - _0.25
.7
.6 33.25
|IOX
AXIAL
.5 CHORD 29.75
.4
/I
,xl
I I I I I •I I I
.3
50 70 90 ]]0 130 70 90 ]0 ]30 ]50
X PITCH X PITCH
Figure 47.--Concluded.
199
RELATgVE HACH NUMBER RELAIIVE FLOW ANGLE
g °05 -- 65
I
0.90 -- 55
i
• x qK
O.75 --
.,z _ I_
lO.O X
I •
PITCH
I
0.60 -- 35
I I It
I ]
0._6 --
I
E6
i I
I I
l II I I I I 15
I I1 I
0.30 1
! .05 -- 60 m
t • • qw
."I
0.90 --
I'. 6O
qz m
r'.
O.75 -- _0
t
m
I
I
0.60 -- 3O
t 'It
I
O.q-6 -- 2O
_ I
I o m
0.30 I II I I I !o I II I I I
! .o5 - b0 --
I • i= q_
.J
•--
k t-
0.90 -- 60 -
= %
0.75 -- q-o --
30. X
m PITCH
0.60 30 -
m
"°qz
0 o '1-5 20 - i
I o m _ B mm
0.30
I II I I I 1 g0
I II I I 1 I
00 -55 -I0 35 80 125 00 -55 -go :35 80 125
X CHOR0 X CHORD
Figure 48.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 80-percent span and near stall. Broken lines denote location of blade leading
2OO
RELATIVE MACH NUHBER RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE
! .05 60 --
I ..I
B • •
0.90
"t
50 --
,r
• w j •
0.75 '1-0 --
+0. X
I °"
w P]ICH
0.60
I 30 -- i
f o
9
0._6 I 1 20 -
I I
0.30 I fl I I I I 10
I II I f I I
I .05 60 --
I I
• =r q= - w w
0.90 ,J 50 --
"T
=: =l¢ • j==
0.75 m q'O -
50, X
P]ICH
0.60
I u •
30 -
I o
O.q'E f 20 - m
• w
I i w m
0.30 I If I I I0 I II I i I
I .05 -- 60 --
I I
• • w
0.90 --
I "4
50 - ===
I-
0.75 -- _0 --
60. X Z
I" .
PIfCH
J ° •
0.60 -- 30 --
I
z
0._'5 -- I 20 --
I • w w
0.30 I II l I I I 1o I II 1 I i I
O0 -55 -10 35 8O 125 -IO0 -55 -I0 35 80 125
X CHORD X CHORD
Figure 48.--Continued.
201
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELAllVE FLOM ANGLE
! .05 60 --
I I
g
0,90
I
50 -
I
I,
• Ir
0.75
tk
40 - "l
I",I
_ I "
0.60 = • 30 -
I w _qb
Z
Z
Z
0.46 _ I 20 - = I
0.30 I II I I
I0
1.05 60 -
I I
0.90
I
60 -
.I
• Ic
0,75 B
40 -
BO. X I
P]TCH
0.60 I 30 --
I
'I
I • • e%
I I
I z
0.4E
I 20 -- I I I
I I
0.30
I II I I 10 I1 1 I I I
1.05 - 60 --
B_
0.90 - BO --
=
b w
%
0.75 -- 40 -
90. X
PITCH
0.60 -- 30 --
0.45 -- 20
=
0.30 I I 1 I I 1o I II I.... I I I
-lO0 -55 -10 35 80 125 O0 -55 -10 35 8O 125
X CHORD X CHORD
Figure 48.--Concluded.
202
RELATIQE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOM ANGLE
I .02 60 --
0.96 57 t
0.72 I I I i I 45
I I I I J
1.02 60 --
0.96 67 m
I,_ZZIIIZIIIZZ'n'IIIIIIZZIIIIIIIITL ii Zz.rzzzZZzZZZI ]1
0.90 5_
-_0, X
AXIAL
0.84 CHORD 51
lZZzzlrZziIZZZZIZIIn'ZZIn'IZII]ZIZ_n'zZzZziTzZI z
0.78 48
0.72 I I I I I 45
I I I I I
1.02 60 -
0.96 67 m
0.78 _8
0.72 _5 I 1 I I I
0 20 _FO 60 80 l O0 2 22 42 62 82 102
X PITCH X PIICH
Figure 49.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 80-percent span and near stall.
203
RELATIVE MACH NUM8ER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
1.02 -- 6O I
0.96 51
zliilzlZlllZIIIIIIllZlzlZxZrT
0.90 5'1-
- dISz -I0. X ¢zl IzzZZZzZzZzzzzzzZ
AXIAL
ilzz_ Zzz
O.8q CHORO 51
-- iiiI Zzzz
z IlII ZzzzzzzZzz
0,78 _ zzzzlIIzlII I '1.8
0.72
1 1 I 1 1 'F5 I I I I I
1 • 02 -- 6O
E1 -- iiIIlli
O. 96 -- illll
I
I II ziIIII ZZZzxzzzi
I
0.90 -- 5_ -- ZZ
I II -6.0 X IZz zz I
I
iI AXIAL III'IIIIIIIIIIZIIIZI
O. 8_ -- I CHORD 51 m
I ZZZzz Z
II
ZZzz
_8
0 o 78 III--IIIII z_[lzzr4[l
0.72 I I I I I q-5
1 I 1 I I
6O
0.90 -- I ZI 54
t I
I
z
O.OX
AX ] AL
I CHORO 5]
0.8't- H i -_ Zzzz;zZ,zzzzzzi_zzzczzzz,.,zzzZ..ziZiI]
]
I
z_
II z _8
II
0.70 !
0.72 I 1 't5
I I 1 I J
0 20 'tO 60 80 _00 22 _2 62 82 102
X PITCH X PITCH
Figure 49 --Continued
204
RELATIVE NACH NUHBER RELAT]VE FLON ANGLE
.5+ 27 --
.+8 2_ --
"X zz z ¢z Zz Izz ZZZz_[ zZZZ_ _zz-zzZZzZzzz
• +2 21 -
zl 100 X
AXIAL
.36 CHORO 18
I
zzz xz.zzzlr'xzII ]_[IlI III
.3O 16
]_ixzzZZZ zzxz
.2+ I I ..+1 I I 12 I 1 I I
.5+ 27 --
• +2 _
ill
II:
109 X
AXIAL
2, -
21 -- it
.36 CHORO ze - . ..Zzl"ZIZZII]
,,30
I 6 -- I]IZj zzzzzzzxz
.2+ I I f z2 I I
2,_ lit
1
.5+
rtr
.q-8 24 -- ]
==:='"x=xzXXXzZZzZ:xZXZ'rtr z t ]][zZXXZ=.,=z"==
_ Zlll
.+2 21 -- t
119 X
AXIAL
• 36 -- CHORD
.30 --
15 --
.2+ i I l I I 12 --
50 70 90 110 130 150 50 70 90 110 130 150
X PITCH X PITCH
Figure 491--Continued.
205
RELAT|VE NACH NUHBER RELAT|VE FLOH ANGLE
.54 27
i t tt!
zz:xx =zx:xx_zzz_z'xz_xZi I
.8"8 25"
.5-2 21
126 X
AXIAL
CHORD zzzzzzozZz_III IIIIIIItlII
.36 18
.3O
.25- I I I I I
15
12
- I ! I
11 J
.55" 30
xx:zzz:xzxZz:zxZxxzNZxaIIZiii
.5"8 1 27
.5"2
|28
AX]AL
X
25-
_t_
III
.36 CHORD 21
zniiixziziiII_[III]_]I
.3O 18
I I I I I
.25" I I I I I 1s
5O 20 90 110 130 150 50 70 90 l!0 I 30 1 50
X PI1CH X PITCH
Figure 49.--Concluded.
206
RELAI|VE NACH NUHBER
RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
• 925 --
I
.825 - I 53- . "" " "l[
_3 --
I
• 725=- • 33 -
|0o0 X
I I
PITCN
"1 zzZI I I
• 625 - I
23 -
I I
I
.626 I
"1= I 13 -- !
I
._95 I _
iIlII
3 I II
I
.95 -
5q',5 -
I
ml i l_ •
.86 - I.
=1"1".6 - ,,,,,
f'
°75 - I
3q-o5 --
20. X
PITCH
• 65 --
2q'.5 -
I
• 66 - I z
14.5 -
I z
.95 --
I 54 • -- • • i= • ,z=L
,mr
.86 - I -=
=1-4
I,
°75 - B • 34
• • ,z I 30. X
PITCH
• 65 -- I .
2'1-
I
• 55 - I
141
.
I
•m
I II I I I
75 -35 5 q'5
I I "1 I _ -f"
85 125 ;'5 -35 5 q-5 1_5 J95
X CHORD
,t' CHORD
Figure 50.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 90-percent span and near stall. Broken lines denote location of blade leading
and trailing edges.
207
RELATIVE FLOg &NGLE
RELATIVE NACH NUHBER
.95 5'i- I i
I °i
.85
l
"1'
',1 3'T
.75
''1%
I=
I 2_
.65
I
I l'l"
.66 • w
I u _m
I I- _.at
II
.'t5
5=1. -- z
• 95 --
I • g u • ==1
I i',
q.q. --
.86 --
"1
z z
I. 3_" --
,75 - I
60, X !
z z • Iz
P]]CH
2_ -
.65 -
I g
I=
I lot --
• 56 -
g
I e
m wmm
54 m
• 95 --
I • el • Imm _
%
I I'
q-or
.85 --
I I"
I
3q" --
.75 - Z
60, X
g • rot
I •
& P]TCH
I 2_
I
.65 --
I =
I
Z •
I
lq"
• 55 --
I I o
• I!
I II I 1 II I J" i-'1"
,'t-5 75 -35 5 '_5 85 125
-75 -35 5 '_5 85 125
X CHORD
X CHORO
Figure 50.--Continued.
208
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE
,95 54 --
I • "" • °%1.
,85 --
I Iz
't'q" -- z
I
,75 -- ..I 34 --
70. X
PITCH
• 65 --
Ix
25 --
I
z z
°66 -- I z
14 --
I w
lem,
°8 5q- --
,7" q-4 --
q
,6 3'1" --
80. X
PITCH
,S u mo 24 --
°'t. 14 --
•
.8
- ,1 54 -
• m u u
..q
o7 • • " ;I q-4
,6 3_
90. X
PITCH
,5
,,. 24
,4 14
,3 I I I 4 I I .... I. I
75 -35 5 45 85 125 75 -35 5 45 85 125
X CHORO X CHORD
Figure 50.--Concluded.
209
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOM ANGLE
• 90 -- 60
.Sff 55
.66 'tO
.60
J I I J J 35
1 I I I 1
.90 -- 6O
.8q" -- 66
.78 50
-_O. X
AXIAL
.72 -- CHORD _5
Z_zzZ_Z_Z_zXZ_X_XZZ_zZZ_x_ZZzZZZ
• 66 --
.60 1 I I I I 35
I I I I I
• 90 -- 60 --
.8_ 55
.78 50 --
-20. X
AXIAL
.66 _rO --
.60 I I 1 I I 3s 1 I I I I
2o ,o 6o so _oo a 2a _2 62 ea _oa
X PITCH X PIICH
Figure 51 .--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 90-percent span and near stall.
210
RELATIVE NACH MUNBER PELAT]VE FLOH ANGLE
.90 60 --
.Sq- 55
.zzzzzZzUXZZzzzzZzZZZ][ZZzz z
._l _ e-zll_lz= z zzzzzz_zz
.78 SO
-I0. X
'r-lI]]'lIxZx.zZZZXZZZzz't_z A X I AL
.72 __z_.zzZzz2zllill rTZzzZZLI ZZz CflORO q'5
.66 _0
.6O I I I I I I I I I I
35
.9O 60 --
.8_ m
66
z_z_ zz
.78
- .zz.z_"zZzz_,._ -6.1X
50
AXIAL
.72 _ _illIi "%,_,.,,,. CHORO q'5
zzZZZzilllI II _z
.66 q-O
.60 I I I I I I I I I I
35
.?O 60
[IIZZXzzz
z
.8_ 56
l
[I ,
.78 50
IZ Z 0.0 X
AXIAL
.72 CHORO _5
.66 q'O
.6O I I I I I 35 I I 1 I I
20 'TO 60 80 1 O0 22 q2 62 62 I02
X P|TCH X PITCH
Figure 5l.--Continued.
211
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOM ANGLE
.6O 25.5 --
T
.5_"
.6O 25,,5 I
.Sq 20.5 I
.'18 i
I 109 X
jI| rzzzzzzzz_r_'_" i 5 • 5
^XIAL
.3O
_
1 I
l
1 I I
5.5
0,5
.....
" ]I i
I I ..... ;
• 60 -- 25.5 -
-- Z
15.5
I
AXIAL
]I] Izz_===_===_= 118 X
I CHORO
[ 10. 5 --
.3O
I I I I I 0.5 - I I _ I J
50 70 90 lO 130 150 50 70 90 110 130 150
X P I '1"OH X P]TCH
Figure 51 .--Continued.
212
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE
.6O 25.5 --
.5q" B 20.5 --
,q-8 15,5 --
I2_X
AXIAL
CHORD 10,5 -- iIIt
zzzZzZiiziiII zIIIzIz
,36 6,5
- I ]
.30 I 0.5
I I I I
6O 25.5
20.6 B
't-8 15.5
I 127 X
o ...,.zitttl
AXIAL
.q'2 CHORD 10.5
zzzzZZZ zz
.36 6.6
.30 0,5 I I I I I
50 lO 90 110 130 150 50 70 90 ] 10 130 150
X PITCH X PITCH
Figure 5 I.--Concluded.
213
.a,,o.a,
Ae.ooao,,os oO Report Documentation Page
Space Adm_nislration
505-62-61
9. Performing Organization Name and Address
11. Contract or Grant No.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Lewis Research Center
Cleveland, Ohio 44135-3191
13. Type of Report and Period Covered
15 Supplementary Notes
16. Abstract
Laser anemometer surveys were made of the three-dimensional flowfield in NASA rotor 67, a low-aspect-ratio
transonic axial-flow fan rotor. The test rotor has a tip relative Mach number of 1.38. The flowfield was surveyed
at design speed for operating conditions near peak efficiency and near stall. Data are presented in the form of
relative Mach number and relative flow angle distributions on surfaces of revolution at nine spanwise locations
evenly spaced from hub to tip. At each spanwise location data were acquired upstream, within, and downstream
of the rotor. Aerodynamic performance measurements and detailed rotor blade and annulus geometry are also
presented so that the experimental results can be used as a test case for three-dimensional turbomachinery flow
analysis codes.
NASA-Langley, 1989