Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 220

/

NASA
Technical
Paper /-..

2879

November 1989

Laser Anemometer
Measurements in a
Transonic Axial-Flow
Fan Rotor

Anthony J. Strazisar,
Jerry R. Wood,
Michael D. Hathaway,
and Kenneth L. Suder

NASA
(_!A_A-I _-?,-'37 P) LAbC K A_, ,.-_, T :.
MFA'3!jR_Mc_'[_ I_'w A TPAN-_'Ti',IC A_I'%L-FLLJW FAP':
RnTrK (NASA) 21_ _ C":,CL ?_)q
Uncl as
_L/J4 01873S3
NASA
Technical
Paper
2879

1989

Laser Anemometer
Measurements in a
Transonic Axial-Flow
Fan Rotor

Anthony J. Strazisar,
Jerry R. Wood,
Michael D. Hathaway,
and Kenneth L. Suder
Lewis Research Center
Cleveland, Ohio

National Aeronautics and


Space Administration
Office of Management
Scientific and Technical
Information Division
Summary
measurements acquired in transonic axial-flow compressors
and predictions from numerical flow analysis codes (refs. 1
A laser fringe anemometer has been used to survey the to 4). These early comparison efforts utilized quasi- and fully
flowfield upstream, within, and downstream of NASA rotor
three-dimensional inviscid analysis codes with simple
67, a low-aspect-ratio transonic axial-flow fan rotor. Laser corrections for viscous flow effects.
anemometer surveys were made of the flowfield for operating The need for detailed flowfield measurements continues as
conditions near peak efficiency and near stall.
computational methods evolve toward fully three-dimensional,
The fan tip relative Mach number was 1.38. The rotor was viscous solution schemes. To meet the need for turbo-
designed for axial inflow and therefore did not require inlet machinery data test cases for use in validating computational
guide vanes. In addition, the fan was operated without stators. methods, the NASA Lewis Research Center has undertaken
The resulting rotor-only configuration enables comparison of a program aimed at obtaining detailed measurements within
the laser anemometer data with results from numerical flow
transonic turbomachinery blade rows using laser anemometry.
analysis codes that assume the flow is steady in the reference
Test case results obtained in an axial-flow turbine vane are
frame of the rotor.
presented in reference 5. Test case results obtained within a
Each laser anemometer survey consists of axial and
low-aspect-ratio axial-flow fan rotor are the subject of this
tangential velocity component measurements acquired at 50 report. The NASA designation for the test rotor is rotor 67.
points from blade to blade at a fixed axial and radial location.
The results reported herein were obtained from a
Surveys were acquired at approximately 30 axial locations on
1.56-aspect-ratio fan rotor with a design tip relative Mach
each of 9 surfaces of revolution spaced approximately every number of 1.38. The fan was designed for axial inflow and
10 percent of span from hub to tip. The laser anemometer
did not require an inlet guide vane. The fan was also operated
survey data are presented in the form of plots of relative Mach
without a stator. The resulting rotor-only configuration
number and relative flow angle. Two types of plots are eliminates circumferential variations in the flowfield induced
presented for each spanwise location: (1) blade-to-blade plots by stationary blade rows and thus allows comparison of the
at fixed chord locations; and (2) streamwise plots at fixed pitch
measurements with numerical analyses which assume a steady
locations. In addition, contour plots of relative Mach number flow relative to the rotor blade row.
are presented at 10-, 30-, and 70-percent span locations. Results of radial surveys of total and static pressure, total
Radial surveys of total and static pressure, total temperature, temperature, and flow angle acquired at stations upstream and
and flow angle were also acquired at stations upstream and downstream of the rotor are reported. The radial survey data
downstream of the rotor. The radial survey data are used to
are used to calculate the rotor overall aerodynamic
calculate the rotor overall aerodynamic performance. The performance.
radial survey and overall performance data are included in
A detailed description of the blade and flowpath geometry
tabular form and can be used to set boundary conditions for
is provided in tabular form so that the experimental results
computational codes.
reported herein can be used as a test case for three-dimensional
A detailed description of the blade and flowpath geometry turbomachinery flow anlaysis codes.
is provided in tabular form so that the experimental results To keep the size of this report manageable, all LA data are
reported herein can be used as a test case for three-dimensional
presented in plotted form. Plots of the relative Mach number
turbomachinery flow anlaysis codes.
and relative flow angle distributions are presented for blade-
The blade and flowpath geometry as well as a complete set to-blade surfaces of revolution at nine spanwise locations
of the laser anemometer survey data are available on magnetic corresponding to the design streamline locations. Data are
media upon request.
presented for two design speed operating conditions--one near
peak efficiency and one near stall. The complete LA data set
consists of axial and tangential velocity component measure-
Introduction
ments at 50 points from blade to blade at each of approximately
270 measurement locations (30 axial locations at each of
In recent years, several investigators have presented compar- 9 spanwise locations). The complete LA data set as well as
isons between detailed laser anemometer (LA) flowfield
the blade and flowpath geometry are available on magnetic
media uponrequest. A description ofthedataformatisgiven and then passes through a sleeve throttle valve into a collector
before it is exhausted back into the atmosphere. The airflow
in appendix B. (Symbols usedin thisreportaredefinedin
is controlled through the collector valve.
appendix A.) Test rotor.-- The test rotor, NASA rotor 67, is shown in
We anticipate thatmanyusersof thesedatawill be
comparing thedatatoresults obtained fromthree-dimensionalfigure 2. It is an undampered low-aspect-ratio design rotor
flowanalysis codes. It isimportant tonotethatonlytheaxial and is the first-stage rotor of a two-stage fan. Inlet and exit
andtangential components ofvelocityweremeasured in this velocity vector diagrams are shown at the design condition
investigation. Wehavestudied theeffectof neglecting the at 10-percent span in figure 3. (All spanwise locations
radialvelocity components whencomparing three-dimensionaldiscussed in this report are measured from the tip.) A complete
computed resultstothedatapresented herein.Results from description of the aerodynamic design of the full two-stage
Denton's three-dimensional Eulercode(ref.6)wereusedto fan is given in references 11 and 12.
calculatetheMachnumber withandwithout theradialvelocity The rotor design pressure ratio is 1.63 at a mass flow of

included, andtheeffectwasfoundtobeminimal.However, 33.25 kg/sec. The design rotational speed is 16 043 rpm,
thiseffectshouldbechecked foreachindividual code. which yields a tip speed of 429 m/sec and an inlet tip relative
Theresults reported hereinareonlysuitable forcomparison Mach number of 1.38. The rotor has 22 blades and an aspect
to resultsfromthree-dimensional codeswhichhavesome ratio of 1.56 (based on average span/root axial chord). The
viscous losses included. Thedatacouldalsobecompared to rotor solidity varies from 3.11 at the hub to 1.29 at the tip.
resultsfromanS1-$2calculation procedure if an$2code The inlet and exit tip diameters are 51.4 and 48.5 cm,
capable of givingreasonable streamsheet thickness distribu- respectively, and the inlet and exit hub/tip radius ratios are
0.375 and 0.478, respectively. A fillet radius of 1.78 mm is
tionsthroughtherotoris used.
used at the airfoil-hub juncture. The square root of the mean
Thisreportpresents adetaileddescription ofthebladeand
flowpath geometry, presents thedata,anddiscusses measure- square of the airfoil surface finish is 0.8 /_m or better, the
airfoil surface tolerance is ±0.04 ram, and the running tip
mentuncertainty. Noattempt is made tocompare thedatato
computational resultsortousethedatatostudydetailed flow clearance is approximately 1.0 mm.
Two features of the rotor blading which can be seen in
physics. Comparisons between thedataandDenton's three-
dimensional Eulercodecanbefoundin references 7and8. figure 2 are a strain gauge mounted on the suction surface of
Flowphysical detailswhichhave beenstudied usingthese data one blade and a nick in the leading edge of another blade. The
include(1) flowfieldvariations frompassage to passage, leading edge nick occurred after the laser anemometer flow-
passage shockstructure,strength,and steadiness, and field measurements were completed. The blade with the strain
(2)vortexshedding fromthebladetrailingedge.Discussions gauge was included in the blades surveyed with the laser
of theseflowfeatures canbefoundin references 8 to 10. anemometer. The impact of the strain gauge on the flowfield
is discussed in reference 9. The impact on the results presented
in this report is considered to be minimal because the blade
with the strain gauge affects only 1 of the 17 blade passages
Apparatus surveyed with the laser anemometer and the results reported
here are averaged across all 17 blade passages.
Axial Compressor Facility Blade coordinates at the design speed operating condition

A schematic diagram of the NASA Lewis single-stage axial- are given in table I for surfaces of revolution for 14 blade
sections. The nomenclature used in table I is shown in figure 4.
flow compressor test facility is shown in figure 1. The drive
system consists of a 3000-hp electric motor with a variable- The origin of all blade geometry Z-coordinates is the inter-
section of the blade leading edge with the hub. The blade
frequency power supply. Motor speed is controllable from 400
surface coordinates are given at 35 points for each blade
to 3600 rpm. The motor is coupled to a 5.25 gear ratio speed
section. These coordinates describe a blunt-edge blade with
increaser gear box that in turn drives the rotor. The facility
is sized for a maximum airflow of 45 kg/sec with atmospheric the Z-coordinates for points 1 and 35 corresponding to the
minimum and maximum axial extents of the blade leading and
air as the working fluid.
Air is drawn into the facility from an inlet located on the trailing edge circles. Coordinates which describe the blade
roof of the building. The air first passes through a filter to leading and trailing edge circles precede the blade surface
coordinates for each blade section. The blade edge circles fit
removed large particles. It then passes through a flow measuring
into the blade surfaces in a meridional (along an R,Z-line) and
station consisting of a thin-plate orifice, through inlet butterfly
valves, and into a plenum chamber. The air is not dried before radius x angular coordinate system. The blade edge circles are
tangent to both blade surfaces and to the Z-coordinate of points
entering the plenum. The air is accelerated into the compressor
1 and 35 listed in the blade surface table.
test section through a nozzle, passes through the test rotor,
Thebladesections
runfromthehuboftherotortotheshroud. similar results. Therefore, although the seed particles are
Bladesection14liesoutsidethephysicalbladetip. The actually of the order of 0.5 izm in diameter, only particles
R,Z-Iocation of the actual tip of the blade under design speed which are of the order of 1.0 to 1.4 #m in diameter scatter
operating conditions can be obtained by subtracting 1.0 mm
enough light to be detected by the laser anemometer optical
from blade section 14 in a direction which is normal to the system.
annulus shroud contour.
The rotor geometry under design speed operating conditions
is normally determined by applying deflections calculated by
the NASTRAN finite-element computer code to the blade Test Procedure
manufacturing coordinates. However, in the present work the
actual blade tip geometry was measured at design speed with Aerodynamic Performance Measurements
the laser anemometer by focussing the LA probe volume on
The plenum total temperature is measured by two
the blade tip. During the analysis of these blade tip position thermocouples located in the plenum. The rotor mass flow is
data it became apparent that the actual blade untwist was
determined from the measured pressure differential across the
slightly less than that predicted by the NASTRAN code. The
calibrated orifice plate. Radial surveys of total and static
NASTRAN-derived geometry was therefore corrected to yield
pressure, total temperature, and flow angle are made at survey
a best match with the laser measurements at the blade tip. This stations 1 and 2 located upstream and downstream of the rotor
correction amounts to a 1.4 ° restagger toward the closed
as shown in figure 5. The total pressure, total temperature,
position at the planar manufacturing section located 25.4 cm
and flow angle are measured by a single self-nulling
along the stacking axis from the rotor centerline. This
combination (cobra + thermocouple) probe, while the static
correction is faired to 0 ° at the planar manufacturing section
pressure is measured by a single self-nulling 18 ° wedge-angle
located 20.32 cm along the stacking axis from the rotor center-
probe. Drawings of the combination and wedge-angle probe
line, which is the location where the NASTRAN-predicted are shown in figure 6. At stations 1 and 2 measurements were
deflections begin to deviate from a simple beam deflection acquired at nine radial locations across the annulus. Additional
analysis. The blade geometry listed in table I has resulted from
measurements were made in the endwall regions at station 1
this process and is considered to be an accurate representation
to obtain good resolution of the annulus wall boundary layers.
of the actual blade geometry under design speed operating Inner- and outer-wall static pressures are also measured at
conditions.
stations 1 and 2.
Annulus.--The nomenclature used to define the hub and
The overall pressure ratio and efficiency are calculated based
shroud contours is also shown in figure 4. The hub and shroud
on appropriate averages of the radial distributions of total
contours are given in table II. The origin of the Z-coordinate
pressure and total temperature measured at survey stations 1
corresponds to the origin of the Z-coordinate used to define
and 2. Details of the averaging procedures used are given in
the blade geometry--i.e., Z = 0 corresponds to the intersection the subsequent Calculation Procedures section.
of the blade leading edge with the hub flowpath.

Laser Anemometer Measurements


Laser Anemometer System
The laser anemometer measurement location in the sta-
The laser anemometer system used in the present investi-
tionary reference frame is specified by the parameters AP, RP,
gation is a single-channel fringe anemometer which is described
and CP. As shown schematically in figure 7, AP is the axial
in detail in references 13 to 15. Optical access to the flowfieid
position, RP the radial position measured from the compressor
is provided by a 3-mm-thick glass window which conforms
axis of rotation, and CP the circumferential position measured
to the flowpath contour in both the circumferential and
relative to the Z-0-plane. Velocity measurements occur along
streamwise directions. Liquid fluorescent seed particles are
the circumferential measurement line which is swept through
injected into the flow through a 6-mm-diameter tube 35 cm
the LA measurement location as the blades rotate past the
upstream of the rotor. Recent measurements made with aerosol measurement location.
sizing instrumentation indicate that the mean particle size is
Since an LA measurement is a random event triggered by
aproximately 0.5 #m. Measurements reported in reference 15
the presence of a seed particle in the probe volume, the blade
indicate a particle size of 1.0 to 1.4 #m based on particle lag
row rotational position must be measured each time a velocity
across the rotor passage shock. These measurements were
measurement occurs. The method used to determine the blade
made on a different transonic rotor with a tip speed similar row rotational position is shown schematically in figure 8. A
to that of the rotor used in the present work. Particle lag once-per-revolution (OPR) pulse, which originates from the
measurements repeated during the present investigation yielded face of the fan rotor disk, provides rotor speed information
measurement window. The average value of all velocity
to an electronic shaft angle encoder. The shaft angle encoder
measurements that occur in each window is plotted at a point
uses the elapsed time between the last two OPR pulses to
located at the center of the window. These features of the data
calculate the output pulse frequency required to generate a
plots are shown schematically in figure 10.
given number of pulses per rotor revolution. The output pulse
Since the NASA Lewis LA system is a single-channel
frequency is adjusted by the encoder for each new OPR signal
to maintain a fixed number of pulses lbr each rotor revolution system, only one velocity component is measured during a
given LA data acquisition run. The axial and tangential velocity
as the rotor speed drifts. For each new OPR signal, the encoder
also initializes an internal counter and then starts to count the components could be directly measured by orienting the probe
volume fringe pattern normal to the axial and tangential
pulses generated during the current rotor revolution. Each time
directions, respectively. However, large measurement errors
a velocity measurement occurs, the data acquisition computer
can occur (see ref. 15) if the fringe orientation is more than
records the measured velocity along with the current shaft
30 ° from the absolute flow angle. Such errors are minimized
angle encoder pulse count. Measurements which occur
by first determining the circumferentially averaged absolute
anywhere between two adjacent pulses are thus assigned to
flow angle at each measurement location from a preliminary
the same measurement window.
The distribution of measurement windows along a survey of the flowfield. Two different fringe orientations which
are within 20 ° of the circumferentially averaged flow angle
circumferential measurement line is specified by the following
are then specified for each axial, radial measurement location.
parameters:
For example, if the circumferentially averaged flow angle
(1) Number of blade passages measured, NP
along a measurement line is 40 °, the operator would collect
(2) Number of measurement windows per blade passage,
NWN data at fringe orientations of 20 ° and 60 ° during two runs made
on the circumferential measurement line. The axial and
(3) Value of the first measurement window in which
measurements are recorded, WNBEG tangential velocity components are then calculated using data
from these two runs following the procedure outlined in the
The width of a window defines the minimum spatial
Calculation Procedures section.
resolution of the data in the circumferential direction. It is
therefore advantageous to select the smallest window width In practice, the LA operator specifies the total number of
measurements required for each run. For the present rotor the
possible while maintaining a reasonable total number of
number of measurements requested was generally 60 000. For
windows. All measurements reported herein were acquired
with NP = 17 and NW = 50. The 17 measured blade passages 17 surveyed blade passages with 50 measurement windows

form a contiguous segment on the rotor, which has a total of per blade passage, this yields approximately 70 measurements
in each measurement window for each fringe orientation if
22 blades. In other words, we do not measure a few blade
the measurements are evenly distributed. As will be discussed
passages, skip one passage, and then measure more blade
in the Calculation Procedures section, all measurements
passages.
which occur within a given measurement window are averaged
At a given axial and radial location the first measurement
window in which data are recorded WNBEG is chosen such together to obtain a mean velocity which is assigned to the
that the window lies on the suction surface of a blade. The center of the window.
FIowfield surveys are performed by collecting data at
value of WNBEG is a function of the axial and radial location
of the measurement line. The variation of WNBEG with axial varying AP,RP locations. LA measurements are acquired along
conical measurement surfaces which approximate the location
location is shown schematically in figure 9. For clarity, only
of the rotor design streamsurfaces. The radial coordinates of
15 measurement windows are shown from blade to blade in
the design streamlines are known at stations 1 and 2 (which
this figure. As shown in figure 9, WNBEG is chosen so as
are the locations of conventional pressure and temperature
to lie on a straight-line extension of the blade mean camber
surveys), at the rotor blade leading and trailing edges, and
line upstream and downstream of the blade. In practice, the
at the stator leading edge location. The measurement surfaces
blade geometry is used to calculate the value of WNBEG for
are created using straight-line interpolation between these
each axial and radial measurement location. Because of blade
untwist under varying speed and aerodynamic loading points as shown in figure 11. A meridional view of all the
measurement surfaces showing the axial, radial coordinates
conditions, the accuracy of the calculation of WNBEG is of
of the measurement points is shown in figure 5.
the order of one or two measurement windows.
The measurement windows in a blade passage are evenly
distributed along the blade pitch, not along the gap between Calculation Procedures
adjacent blade surfaces. In the blade-to-blade data plots
presented in this report, the first point (at the left edge of the Aerodynamic Performance Data
plot) is on the suction side of the blade passage. The blade
The values of total and static pressure and total temperature
appears near the right edge of the plot as a region of zero data
since no measurements are acquired when the blade is in a measured at survey stations 1 and 2 are first corrected for Math
number
andstreamline
slope.These
corrections
arebased
on Laser Anemometer Measurements
a calibration of each probe used and on the design streamline
slope. All measurements are corrected to NACA standard-day The laser anemometer velocity measurements acquired along
sea-level conditions (temperature, 288.2 K; pressure, 101 325 a measurement line which passes through a given axial, radial
N/m 2) at the rotor inlet. The rotor overall performance is location can be represented by the following array:
based on orifice mass flow and the aerodynamic survey
measurements acquired at stations 1 and 2 upstream and
v(ij) i = 1,NM(j) j = I,NWN × NP (2)
downstream of the rotor, respectively. The orifice mass flow
is corrected to standard-day conditions at the rotor inlet. The
radial distributions of total temperature are mass averaged across where V(i,j) is the ith measurement in windowj and NM(j)
the annulus. The radial distributions of total pressure are energy the number of measurements acquired in windowj. The total
averaged by converting them to their enthalpy equivalents and number of measurement windows is NWN x NP, where NWN
then mass averaging them across the annulus. The formulas is the number of measurement windows across one rotor pitch,
used are and NP the number of rotor blade passages which are surveyed.
As mentioned previously, all of the data reported herein were
acquired with NWN = 50, NP = 17.
m
_1"_ - I
The velocities are corrected to standard day conditions using
the relation

i=l & i(_)j.,(6A.,)j,

NR

K.(ij) = v(i,j) _,, (3)


i=1
I

where V and V,, are the uncorrected and corrected velocities,


respectively, and T, and TOthe standard day and plenum total
NR
temperatures, respectively. The c subscript notation will be
dropped in the following discussion for simplicity--all velocities
_l Tj/oj.i(V_)j.,(AAa,), (1) should be understood to be standard day corrected.
= i=
NR The mean and standard deviation of the velocity measure-
ments acquired within each measurement window are calculated
aj/(V.). (,aA..) ,
as follows:
i=1

_(j) _ 1 NM(j)
j = I,NWN x NP (4)
NM(j) i_l
= V(i,j)

"flAP =

-- -- |

T, V'(j) = INM (j)1 - 1 N_j)


i=i [_(j) - V(i'j)]2 1 1/2

j = 1,NWN x NP (5)
Subscript i refers to the ith radial measurement location,
subscript j to the station number, AA,,, is the incremental
annulus area, and NR the number of survey locations across where V(j) is the circumferential distribution of the ensemble-
the annulus. Standard practice is to use nine survey locations averaged velocity component in the fringe normal direction
from tip to hub. In the present investigation, additional survey across each of the NP blade passages which were surveyed.
locations were used at station 1 at the peak efficiency and near The ensemble averaging period is one rotor revolution.
stall operating conditions to obtain increased resolution of the As mentioned in the previous Test Procedure section,
inlet boundary layers for use in comparing measured measurements acquired at two different fringe orientations are
performance to that predicted by numerical analysis codes. required to calculate the axial and tangential components of
These additional stations were not included in the overall velocity. This calculation is performed as the simultaneous
performance results because they were not used for all rotor solution of the following two equations for the two unknowns
operating conditions. V. and Vo:
The local speed of sound in each window in the averaged
_oL (j) = Vz(j) cos ZOl + Vo(j) sin ZO1 blade passage is calculated as follows:

j = 1,NWN x NP (6)

Vzo:(J) = Vz(J) cos ZO2 + Vo(j) sin 7-,02


cpT, = cpt(k) + - wR_o(k)
j = 1,NWN × NP (7)

VSOUND(k) = ",/(3' - 1)cpt(k) =


where ZOl and Z02are the fringe orientation angles for the
two separate runs, Vat and _-02 the ensemble average velocity
distributions calculated from equation (4) for the two separate
((_t-l) IcpTo+coR_o(k) [_(k)]
22 / '''2
runs, and V. and V0 the ensemble-averaged distributions of
the axial and tangential velocity, respectively._
The circumferential distribution of V: and Vo across each where T,, is the plenum total temperature, t(k) the local static
blade passage can be used to assess the passage-to-passage temperature, V(k) the absolute velocity calculated from
variations in the ensemble average flowfield. However, the data Vz(k) and Vo(k), R the radius, and w the rotational speed.
set is quite large, since there are NWN x NP = 50 x 17 = 850 data The relative Mach number is then calculated from the
points along the measurement line through each (AP,RP) point relative velocity and the local speed of sound:
shown in figure 5. NASA Lewis can provide the data in this
spatially unaveraged form on magnetic tape upon request. W(k)
To provide a more compact data set which should meet the MRL.t.( k ) _ k = 1,NWN (11)
VSOUND(k)
needs of most users, the measurements acquired in each of
the NP blade passages surveyed are spatially averaged across
all the measured blade passages to yield a passage-averaged where
circumferential velocity distribution.
formed as follows:
The spatial average is
=iI ,k,12
+I o k,-R 1211 (12)

NP
= 1 Results and Discussion
_(k) NP-NZ .E Vz[k+(j-1)NWN]
./=1
(8) Aerodynamic Performance Measurements
k = I,NWN
Aerodynamic performance data and laser anemometer
flowfield measurements are presented for two design-speed
NP operating conditions--one near peak efficiency and one near
stall. The location of these two points on the rotor design speed
_o(k) = NP -1 NZ _1
j= V0 [k + (j - 1)NWN]
operating line is shown in figure 12 along with additional
k = I,NWN (9) aerodynamic performance measurements which are not
reported in detail here. The data shown in figure 12 are based
on orifice mass flow and the aerodynamic survey measure-
where NZ is the number of blade passages in which no ments acquired at survey stations 1 and 2 upstream and
measurementswere acquir=ed in window number k. downstream of the rotor.
Values of Vz(k) and Vo(k) are used to calculate the The aerodynamic radial survey results obtained at survey
passage-averaged relative flow angle as follows: stations 1 and 2 at the near peak efficiency and the near stall
conditions are presented in tables III(a) and (b). The overall
rotor aerodynamic performance based on the energy-averaged
k= 1,NWN (10) total pressure ratio and mass-averaged total temperature ratio
_REL(k) = ARCTAN[ _0(k)-Rw]
at station 2 is included in each table just ahead of the station 2
radial survey results.
where R is the radius and w the rotor rotational speed in radians The station 1 survey data from tables IIl(a) and (b) are
plotted in figures 13 and 14 in the form of the total velocity
per second.
distribution normalized withrespect tothecriticalvelocityat Measurements madewitha hot-wireanemometer 8 cm
standard-day conditions. Thestaticpressure gradientnearthe upstream oftherotorhubleading edgeplaneindicate a free-
casingwallforthepeakefficiency condition doesnotmatch stream turbulence levelof about1.5percent.
wellwiththemeasured wallstaticpressure. Sincethenear
wallpressure measurements weremade withastandard aero- Laser Anemometer Measurements
dynamic probe, it ispossible thattheprobe access holeorprobe
stemaffected themeasurements nearthecasing. Tocheck this Two features of the velocity measurements should be kept
effect,thestaticpressure distribution from64-percent span in mind when interpreting the LA data. First, the average of
fromthehubto thecasingwaschanged to givea linear all velocity measurements which occur in a given window is
distributiontothemeasured valueofthecasing static
pressure. often considered as a single velocity measured at a point
Themodifiedvelocitydistribution whichresultsfromthis located at the center of the measurement window. It is

process isplotted alongwiththemeasured velocity distribution important to remember that the measurements do not actually
in figure13.Themassflowcorresponding toeachvelocity occur at a single point but rather occur in a region centered
distribution wascalculated usingacubicspline.Themeasured around the plotted point. Second, although each individual
pressure distribution yieldsa massflow of 34.62kg/sec velocity measurement provides an instantaneous measurement
(76.32 lbm/sec), whilethemodified distribution yieldsamass of the unsteady velocity field, the measurements acquired in
flowof34.78 kg/sec (76.66 lbm/sec). Thisdifference iswithin each measurement window are acquired over thousands of
themeasurement accuracy of theorifice. separate rotor revolutions. The average of all velocity
Alsoshown infigures13and14isthevelocitydistribution measurements acquired in a given window is therefore the
obtained fromaradialsurveyperformed atstation1withthe ensemble average (with the averaging period being one rotor
laser anemometer. Agreement between thevelocities calculated revolution) velocity at the window location.
fromthe surveyprobepressure measurements andthose The location of each laser anemometer measurement is listed

measured withthelaseranemometer iswithin8percent atall in table VI. The absolute angular location of the first
spanwise locations. Thislevelofagreement isconsidered to measurement window is given by the parameter WNBEG.
bereasonable forseveral reasons. First,theflowfield atstation1 Since the rotor has 22 blades and there are 50 measurement
isaffected bythepotential flowwhichpropagates upstream of windows across each blade passage, there are a total of 1100
therotor,particularly nearthehub.Theabsolute velocityand measurement windows around the rotor wheel. The absolute
flowangletherefore varyslightlyacross thebladepitch.The angular location which corresponds to a given value of
range between themaximum andminimum velocitymeasured WNBEG can therefore be obtained from
across thebladepitchisshownbytheflagsin figures13and
14.Second, although thelaseranemometer system measures 2rWNBEG
thepitchwise distribution ofvelocity atstation 1,thepitchwise 0(radians) -
1100
density distribution isnotknown. Therefore theLAdatacannot
bemassaveraged. TheLA datashownin figures13and14
werearithmetically averaged across thebladepitch.Finally, The origin of the AP-coordinate shown in figure 5 (which
theaerodynamic surveyprobesrespond to thepitchwise defines the laser anemometer measurement axial location as well
varyingvelocity andpressure fieldinsome unknown manner. as the axial location of aerodynamic survey stations 1 and 2)
The time-averaged probemeasurements are thenmass is different from the origin of the Z-coordinate shown in figure 4
averaged toyieldtheresultsshownin figures13and14. (which defines the blade sections and the annulus geometry).
Theintegrated massflowatstations 1and2wascalculated The conversion factor between the two Z-coordinates is given by
fromthesurvey datalistedin tables Ill(a) and(b)usingthe
measurement radiiandannular areaelements listedintableIV. APta ...... d ..... data = Zmad,, -- 2. 159 cm
Theresults arepresented intableV.Notethatwhencalculating
themassflowfromanintegration of theradialdistribution of The absolute axial locations listed in table VI are dependent
flowparameters across theannulus, theresultisdependent on on the rotor axial deflection, which varies with operating
thenumber ofannular elements usedintheintegration andon condition from day to day. The axial locations listed in table VI
thelocation oftheelement centers. Therefore, whencomparing for 0- and 100-percent chord may therefore not agree with
mass- andenergy-averaged conditions predicted bycomputa- those listed in the blade geometry data in table I. Consequently,
tionalresults to themeasured valuesshownin tableV, one when comparing laser anemometer measurements to computed
should takecaretousecomputed conditions attheradiishown results, one should use the percent chord locations listed in
in tableIV andto usetheannularareaelements shownin table VI as a method of placing the axial measurement location
tableIV toobtainaccurate comparisons. relative to the blade.
The radial measurement locations listed in table VI in terms The streamwise and blade-to-blade plots of relative Mach

of percent span from the tip (i.e., 10- through 90-percent span) number and relative flow angle are presented in the following

define LA measurement surfaces as shown in figure 11 which figures:


follow the design streamlines that pass through the rotor
trailing edge at 10 through 90 percent of mass flow fraction Near peak efficiency Near stall
as measured from the blade tip. As a result, the measurement
locations listed for 10-percent span, for example, do not in Figure Percent Figure Percen!
span span
general lie at 10 percent of geometric span from the tip. The
radial location of each measurement point relative to the inner 18.19 10 34,35 10
and outer flowpath radius at a given axial location should 20.21 20 36,37 20
therefore be determined by calculating the percent span 22.23 30 48,49 30
location based on the absolute axial, radial measurement 24,25 40 40,41 40
26,27 50 42.43 50
locations given in table VI along with the flowpath coordinates
28,29 60 44,45 60
listed in table II. 46,47 70
30,31 70
The laser anemometer data are presented in the form of 32,33 80 48,49 80
relative Mach number and relative flow angle distributions 50,51 90

along the surfaces of revolution which are shown schematically


in figures 15 and 16.
Data are not presented at 90-percent span for the peak
Figure 15 illustrates the constant pitch lines along which the
efficiency condition because of a high degree of scatter in the
LA data are presented in the form of streamwise plots for each
data. The interpretation of the uncertainO' interval drawn for
immersion. The data are plotted in the streamwise direction
each LA measurement in figures 18 to 51 is discussed in the
from approximately one chord upstream of the rotor, through next section.
the rotor, and approximately one chord downstream of the
rotor along nine constant-pitch lines. The pitch is measured
Data Uncertainty and Reproducibility
relative to the blade suction surface--0-percent pitch is the
suction surface of one blade, 100-percent pitch is the suction The rotor speed is constant to within 0.3 percent of design

surface of the adjacent blade. speed. The orifice mass flow is maintained constant to within

Figure 16 illustrates the constant chord lines along which 0.14 kg/sec.

the LA data are presented in the form of blade-to-blade plots Aerodynamic probe measurements.--The aerodynamic
for each immersion. At 10-, 30-, and 70-percent span, blade- survey probes were calibrated before starting the test program.

to-blade plots of the data are presented for each chordwise Pressure probes are calibrated for streamline pitch angle
measurement location. To limit the number of plots in this sensitivity. Temperature probes are calibrated to determine

report, blade-to-blade plots at the remaining immersions are recovery factors for the Mach number range encountered

presented at only six chordwise locations upstream and during testing. The estimated uncertainties in the individual
downstream of the blade. These chordwise locations were aerodynamic survey measurements are as follows:
chosen because the Mach number and flow angle distributions
at these locations define the bow wave system and the blade Flow angle, deg .................................................. 1
wake. The blade-to-blade distributions of Mach number and Temperature, K ................................................ 0.6

flow angle within the blade at immersions other than 10-, 30-, Total pressure at station 1, N/cm 2 ......................... 0.1

and 70-percent span can be determined at nine points across Static pressure at station 1, N/cm 2 ......................... 0.4

the blade pitch from the nine streamwise plots presented herein Total pressure at station 2, N/cm 2 ........................ 0.10
for each immersion or can be obtained from the complete LA Static pressures at station 2, N/cm 2 ...................... 0.07

data set which is available upon request on magnetic media.


Contour plots of the relative Mach number distribution along The uncertainty in overall performance is affected by two
the LA measurement surfaces at 10-, 30-, and 70-percent span additional factors. First, the combination probe and the static

are shown in figure 17 for both the near peak efficiency and pressure probe were located at a single circumferential

the near stall operating conditions. These contour plots are location. Therefore, any effects due to asymmetries in the

from reference 7. They were generated from the data by flowfield are not included in the measurements reported here.

applying data enhancement procedures such as smoothing and Second, only nine radial survey locations were used at the rotor

interpolation in the direction of the steepest Mach number exit (survey station 2); this introduces uncertainty in the

gradient. These procedures, which are fully described in spanwise-averaged quantities at station 2 because of a lack of
reference 7, do not affect the overall characteristics of the resolution within the endwall boundary layers.

contour plots. The contour plots formed from the data without Laser anemometer measurements.--The estimated uncer-

using enhancement procedures are compared to the enhanced tainty for the laser anemometer data is nominally 1.0 percent

contour plots in reference 7. on velocity and 1° on flow angle. This uncertainty is dependent
on many factors, including local turbulence intensity, through- The magnitude of the uncertainty in Mach number and flow
flow unsteadiness, velocity bias errors, and rotor speed drift angle is indicated by the uncertaino, interval drawn on each
during each individual rotor revolution. Uncertainties due to data point in figures 18 to 51. These uncertainty intervals
rotor speed drift are minimized by not recording measurements indicate a 95-percent confidence level that the true mean lies
from rotor revolutions during which the rotor speed drifted within the uncertainty interval.
by more than 0.4 percent. The measurement uncertainty is
higher in regions of high-velocity gradients which occur across
Summary of Results
the rotor passage shock and across the blades wakes. In these
regions the accuracy of the laser anemometer measurements A laser anemometer has been used to provide detailed
is controlled by the ability of the seed particles to follow the flowfield surveys within a low-aspect-ratio axial-flow transonic
flow. A more complete discussion of measurement uncer- fan rotor operating in a rotor-only configuration. Both laser
tainties and seed particle tracking error across a typical anemometer and aerodynamic performance data were acquired
transonic rotor passage shock can be found in reference 15. at operating conditions near peak efficiency and near stall.
The statistical uncertainty in the relative Mach number and Flowpath coordinates and detailed blade geometry are
flow angle is estimated by first determining the statistical presented in tabular form. The aerodynamic performance is
uncertainty in _ and _ in each individual measurement presented in tabular form as well as in plots of the radial
window using equation (5). These statistical uncertainties are distribution of velocity upstream of the rotor. The laser
then combined by applying propagation of uncertainty methods anemometer data are presented in the form of pitchwise and
(ref. 16) to equations (6) to (9) to determine the uncertainty in streamwise plots of the distribution of relative Mach number
_, and Vo. Finally, the uncertainty in Mach number and flow and relative flow angle on blade-to-blade streamsurfaces
angle is determined by applying propagation of uncertainty located at nine equally spaced spanwise locations from hub
methods to equations (10) and (11). to tip.
Appendix AmSymbols

A Aon incremental annulus area (eq. (1)) TNPC blade thickness normal to the mean camber line,

AP laser anemometer axial measurement location cm (fig. 4)

(fig. 7) U blade velocity, m/sec (fig. 3)


BETA angle of blade mean camber line from meridional V velocity, m/sec
direction (table I) VSOUND sonic velocity, m/sec
BETA 1 angle of blade surface 1 from meridionai direction W relative velocity, m/sec
(fig. 4) WNBEG starting window number for laser anemometer
BETA2 angle of blade surface 2 from meridional direction survey
(fig. 4) Z axial coordinate used to define blade and flowpath
cp coefficient of specific heat at constant pressure geometry (fig. 4)
(eq. (11)) ZO laser anemometer fringe angle relative to axial
MREL relative Mach number direction, deg
NM number of LA measurements in each measurement [J REL relative flow angle, deg
window
3" ratio of specific heats (eq. (11))
NP number of blade passages surveyed with laser
'qAD adiabatic efficiency (eq. (1))
anemometer
0 circumferential coordinate (fig. 8)
NR number of points in aerodynamic performance
p static density (eq. (1))
radial survey (eq. (1))
NWN number of laser anemometer measurement O2 rotational speed, radians/sec

windows in blade passage


NZ number of blade passages for which no LA Subscripts:
measurements occurred in given measurement C corrected to standard day conditions
window
Z axial velocity component
OPR once-per-revolution timing mark (fig. 8) 0 tangential velocity component
P total pressure (eq. (1)) 0 plenum conditions
R radial coordinate used to define blade and flowpath 1 aerodynamic survey station upstream of rotor
geometry (fig. 4)
2 aerodynamic survey station downstream of rotor
RP laser anemometer radial measurement location
(fig. 7)
T total temperature (eq. (1)) Superscripts:
- ensemble-averaged quantity
L NACA standard day temperature, 288.2 K
t = passage-averaged quantity
static temperature
' standard deviation
THSP1 angular coordinate of blade surface 1, radians
(table I)
THSP2 angular coordinate of blade surface 2, radians
(table I)

10
Appendix B--Description of Data Available on Magnetic Media

Blade and flowpath geometry as well as the complete set AP,RP,CP


of laser anemometer measurements acquired at peak efficiency Absolute axial, radial, and circumferential measurement
and near stall operating conditions are available on magnetic locations, respectively. In the present work the value of CP
media as formatted ASCII files. The contents of the blade and
is fixed and is not important. Recall that the origin of the
flowpath geometry files are exactly as shown in tables I and axial coordinate which describes the LA measurement
II, respectively. The contents of the laser anemometer data location AP is different from the origin of the blade and
files are now described.
flowpath coordinates. The relationship between the two
coordinate systems is given by

Types of Laser Anemometer Data Files APt .......a,,, = Zbt,de -- 2. 159 cm


RT
The laser anemometer data are acquired on surfaces of
Most LA measurements were acquired with the LA optical
revolution called measurement surfaces which approximate
axis aligned in the radial direction. However, to minimize
streamsurfaces through the rotor at the design operating
optical blockage due to blade twist the LA optical axis can
condition. A measurement surface is shown schematically in
be tilted away from the radial direction. The angular
figure 11. The nine measurement surfaces used in the present
deflection of the LA optical axis, measured in the R-0-plane
investigation are shown in figure 5. All the LA data acquired
shown in figure 7, is given by the angle RT. When RT ;_ O,
at a given axial and radial location under a given operating
the measured velocity components lie in the Z-0'-plane
condition are contained in a scan. Two types of data files are
shown in figure B-1 rather than in the Z-0-plane. In these
used to describe the scan data--a scan background information
file and a scan data file. cases, the circumferential component of absolute velocity
is given by Vo = Vo, cos RT. This correction is small since
most of the off-radial deflections used in this investigation
were less than 10 ° and the cosine of 10" is 0.985.
Background Information File
PERCENT SPD
The background information file is essentially a catalog by
Rotor speed, corrected to standard day conditions, as a
scan number of all the data acquired on a measurement surface
percentage of the design value of 16 043 rpm.
at a given operating condition. This file contains information
on the measurement location, fan operating condition, and PR
number of measurements acquired at each point along the Total pressure ratio as determined by rakes located far down-
measurement surface. There is one background information stream of the rotor. The rake-measured pressure ratio is only
file for each measurement surface for each fan operating used to reset the rig operating conditions from day to day.
condition. An example of a background information file is A more accurate measure of the rotor total pressure rise is
shown in table B-I. The file contents are now described. provided by the total pressure ratios listed in tables Ill(a)
and (b).
SCAN CWF
Scan number. This is a unique number used to identify the Nominal mass flow as measured by the orifice during data
scan data file which contains the LA data acquired at the acquisition, corrected to standard day conditions.
measurement location and fan operating condition listed in
T01
the background information file.
Plenum total temperature. This temperature is used to
PERCENT CHORD
correct measured conditions to standard day conditions.
Measurement location in terms of percent chord. This value
RUN NUMBERS
is calculated from the absolute measurement location and
Run numbers of the two individual laser anemometer runs
the axial location of the blade leading and trailing edge
during the acquisition of data on the measurement surface. which were combined using equations (3) to (9) of the
As discussed in the Results and Discussion section of the Calculation Procedures section to calculate the axial and
tangential velocity components.
report, the axial location of the blade changes from day to
day. The percent chord location of the data should therefore NP
be used to place the data at the proper location relative to Number of blade passages surveyed with the laser
the blade and flowpath geometry. anemometer.
r" I

_rl > o
/
/ 8

O'_ Z

"-_"'_LASER

"_OPTICAL AXIS

/ / AXIS OF ROTATION

y RP 2pO 0

Figure B-l.--Definition of off-radial beam deflection angle RT. As shown, RT is positive.

conditions with both flag settings indicates that rejected data


NWN
usually occur in regions of high velocity gradients such as
Number of measurement windows across each blade passage
near the blade surfaces and in the edges of wakes. Saved
surveyed.
data in these regions are generally well behaved but display
WNBEG higher scatter between measurements due to the large
Starting measurement window number for the scan data. The velocity gradients. During the present investigation the
measurement windows are numbered relative to a once-per- reject/save flag was always set to save the data. Since no
revolution marker which is fixed to the rotor disk. In the measurements were rejected, the value of NREJ merely
present investigation there are 1100 windows around the serves as an indicator of the scatter in the data.
rotor, 50 windows in each of the 22 blade passages. The
value of WNBEG for each scan is set such that the first
measurement window in the scan data file lies on the blade Scan Data File
suction surface as shown in figure 9. There is one scan data file for each scan listed in the back-
NMEAS ground information file. Each scan data file contains information
Total number of measurements acquired in each of the two on the measurement location, the measured velocity compo-
laser anemometer runs which compromise a scan. nents, measurement uncertainty intervals, passage-to-passage
flow field variations, and the total unsteadiness for each of the
NREJ 50 measurement windows across the blade pitch. An example
Number of measurements flagged for rejection. Each LA
scan data file is shown in table B-II. The file contents are now
run consists of two parts. During the initial part, NMEAS/2
described.
measurements are acquired and a mean velocity is calculated
for each measurement window based on the average of all
AXIAL POSITION
measurements acquired within the window. During the
Absolute axial location of the LA measurement AP. The
second part of the run, additional NMEAS/2 measurements
conversion to percent chord is based on the leading and
are acquired, and each measurement is compared to the
mean velocity previously calculated for the window in which trailing edge axial positions which are also listed in the scan
data file. As discussed in the Results and Discussion section
the measurement occurred. If a measurement deviates by
of the report, the blade axial location shifts from day to day.
more than 25 percent from the mean, the data rejected
counter NREJ is incremented. The measurement is recorded The percent chord location of the data should therefore be
used to properly orient the data relative to the blade and
or discarded depending on the setting of a reject/save flag.
A detailed comparison of data acquired under identical flow flowpath geometry.

12
RADIAL POSITION NO. MEAS.
Absolute radial location of the LA measurements. The Total number of measurements acquired in the measurement
percent span value is based on the radial location of the window number across the NP measured blade passages.
measurement RP and the flowpath hub and tip radius at the This number is the average of the number of measurements
axial location of the measurement AP. acquired in each of the two laser anemometer runs which
comprise the scan.
CIRCUMFERENTIAL POSITION
Absolute circumferential location of the LA measurements. AVG PASS VEL
Spatially ensemble-averaged axial and tangential velocity
BEAM DEFLECTION
components (in m/sec) as calculated by equations (8) and
Off-radial measurement angle RTas defined previously for
(9). A VZ corresponds to _:, and A VT corresponds to _0-
the background information file.
UNCERTAINTY OF AVG
CORR SPEED
Uncertainty intervals for the velocity components (m/sec).
Rotor rotational speed, corrected to standard day conditions.
UFZ and UNTare the uncertainty intervals for the axial and
PRESSURE RATIO, CORR MASS FLOW, TOTAL tangential velocity components, respectively. The odds are
TEMPERATAURE 20:1 that the true mean velocity components _: and _0 lie
These variables are identical to those defined previously for in the intervals AVZ- UVZ< _.<AVZ+ UVZ and
the background information file. AVT- UNT < _o < AVT + UNT.

LEADING/TRAILING EDGE AXIAL POS SDVZ,SDVT


Absolute axial location of the blade leading and trailing edge Spatially ensemble-averaged velocity components _: and _0
during LA data acquisition on the measurement surface. do not provide any information on the degree of flowfield
These locations are determined by reflecting the laser beams variation from passage to passage. A measure of the passage-
off the blade leading and trailing edges at the measurement to-passage flowfield variations is provided by the parameters
surface radial immersion. Since the blade edge axial SDVZ and SDVT, which are the standard deviation between
locations vary slightly from day to day, these locations are the spatially ensemble-averaged velocity components and
used to convert the absolute measurement axial location AP the velocity components measured in each of the NP blade
into a percent chord value. passages that were surveyed. SDFZ and SDVTare calculated
as follows, where j is the blade passage number and
BEGINNING WINDOW NUMBER k = I,NWN:
Value of WNBEG as defined previously for the background
information file.

WINDOW NO. SDVZ(k) = I NP-NZ- 1 i ENP I _(k)


Window number relative to the blade suction surface. There g=l
are 1100 actual measurement windows, 50 windows in each \ 1_'2
of 22 blade passages.
surveyed, measurements
Since only 17 blade passages were
were recorded in only 850 of these - + -i
windows. The results presented in the scan data file are the
spatially ensemble-averaged data which result from applying
equations (3) to (9) to the data. The window number in the SDVT( k )
scan data file is therefore the window number in the NP - NZ -, 1 E
j=l
°(k)
averaged blade passage that results from spatially ensemble- \1/2
averaging measurements, which occurred in the 17 measured
blade passages. Values listed in window 1, for example, are -- _[k + (j- I)NWN]/2 )
the average of measurements, which occurred in windows
1,51, 101, 151 ..... 801, relative to the starting window AVZ', AVT'
number WNBEG. When combining data from several Axial and tangential components of the unresolved unstead-
different scans, as would be required when constructing a iness are denoted by AVZ' and AVT', respectively. The
blade-to-blade contour plot for example, the value of unresolved unsteadiness is defined as the sum of all flow
WNBEG for each scan gives the absolute circumferential fluctuations which are not correlated to the rotor blade
measurement location of the windows for that scan in the
passing frequency. Such fluctuations include rotor speed
averaged blade passage. This feature of the data is shown drift, through-flow fluctuations, vortex streets shed from
in figure 9.
the blade trailing edge, and turbulence.

13
The laser anemometer system used in the present investi-
AVZ
v0 gation is a single-channel system and therefore measures
only the component of unresolved unsteadiness which is in
the fringe orientation direction. Measurements acquired with
a single-channel LA system cannot be used to calculate
values of the unresolved unsteadiness in the axial and
tangential directions unless the measurements are acquired
with the fringes oriented in the axial and tangential
directions, which was not done in the present work. It is,
LA I however, possible to calculate upper and lower bounds for
MEASUREMENT I the unsteadiness components using measurements acquired
at arbitrary fringe orientations.
V_/..B DIRECTION 24
As shown in figure B-2, measurements acquired in
"_MAX[MUM ENVELOPE OF
ABSOLUTE VELOCIIY measurement directions 1 and 2 at a given axial and radial
FLUCIUAT IONS location enable the calculation of _o,, VI, _o2, and V2 in
the directions 1 and 2, respectively. V_ and V_ represent
one standard deviation of the velocity from _0_ and V:02.
The parallelogram ABCD can be defined in figure B-2 by
LA
MEASUREMENT projecting the range of possible velocities defined by Vi
DIRECTION I and V_ perpendicular to the 1 and 2 directions. This paral-
Figure B-2.--Schematic representation of_)undson unresolved unsteadiness. lelogram defines the locii of all possible velocity fluctuations
which are one standard deviation from the mean absolute
velocity V. The extremes of this parallelogram in the Z- and
0-directions define the bounds AVZ' and Air/" included in
each scan data file.

14
I

U
0 _DO
!
_0 ......°.. .... ....0.....°
_HH

_o_m

_OOH
D Q 0

L_

o
z H _ZO

© IIII

.... .°. .... ..°.° ...... 0.


0

i_

Z
_oo_oo_oo____ _ _
Z 0 0.,,,,,° ...... °°,,.°..°°

0 u

< 0 ............... °. .... ..,

LL
z
O_D I:1
© m H_O_ .... °...°°.°.°..00......
h_O
.1 U H_O_

O"

_0
_0=_
_u_

II
0

_0_
.°°°.°.,° ........ .,,,,°.
< oooooooooooooooooooooooo
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN

tel

DDH
....,0.,.0,..,,,,.......

_0_

_U
.... ., ..... ,,.°°,, ..... .

IIIIIIIII

_H_
0 ...... ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ...... ° ....
_O_D
U
_111111 _
III

U- U
u_

15
_m

_0_0

_.
_0
_m

_0
_ ........... o ............................... RTTTRRR
_ ..... _&&3 .................................

v v
<

t9

<

_ o_o_

• o_oo _ ................... o ..............


U..1 * 0 ,-1 _

< -

_ ......................
_n o _n r- ,-_ ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo°°°°°°°°°°°° o ...... _,_

o_

o
o _n

• _g_ & 777 77777777777777777777777 ,7777777777777777777

........................ ....

m_m

]6
References

1. Dunker, R.J.; Strinning, P.E.; and Weyer, H.B.: Experimental Study Supersonic Phenomena in Turbomachines, AGARD CP-401, AGARD,
of the Flow Field Within a Transonic Axial Compressor Rotor by Laser Neuilly-Sur-Seine, France, 1986, pp. 2-1 to 2-14.
Velocimetry and Comparison with Through-flow Calculations. J. Eng. 9. Strazisar, A.J.: Investigation of Flow Phenomena in a Transonic Fan
Power, vol. 100, no. 2, Apr. 1978, pp. 279-286. Rotor Using Laser Anemometery. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, vol.
2. Chima, R.V.; and Strazisar, A.J.: Comparison of Two- and Three- 107, no. 2, Apr. 1985, pp. 427-435.
Dimensional Flow Computations with Laser Anemometer Measurements
10. Hathaway, M.D.; Gertz, J.B.; Epstein, A.H; and Strazisar, A.J.: Rotor
in a Transonic Compressor Rotor. J. Eng. Power, vol. 105, no. 3. July Wake Characteristics of a Transonic Axial-Flow Fan. AIAA J., vol.
1983, pp. 596-605.
24, no. 11, Nov. 1986, pp. 1802-1810.
3. Sarathy, K. P. :Computation of Three-Dimensional Flow Fields Through 11. Cunnan, W.S.; Stevens, W. ; and Urasek, D.C.: Design and Performance
Rotating Blade Rows and Comparison with Experiment. J. Eng. Power, of a 427-Meter-per-Second-Tip-Speed Two-Stage Fan Having a 2.40
w)l. 104, no. 2, Apr. 1982, pp. 394-402. Pressure Ratio. NASA TP-1314, 1978.
4. Singh, UK.: A Computation and Comparison with Measurements of 12. Urasek, D.C.: Gorrell, W.T.; and Cunnan, W.S. : Performance of Two-
Transonic Flow in an Axial Compressor Stage with Shock and Boundary Stage Fan Having Low-Aspect-Ratio, First-Stage Rotor Blading. NASA
Layer Interaction. J. Eng. Power, vol. 104, no. 2, Apr. 1982, TP-1493, 1979.
pp. 510-515.
13. Powell, J.A.; Strazisar, A.J.; and Seashohz, R.G.: High-Speed Laser
5. Goldman, L.J.; and Seasholtz, R.G.: Laser Anemometer Measurements
Anemometer System for lntra-Rotor Flow Mapping in Turbomachinery.
in an Annular Cascade of Core Turbine Vanes and Comparison with NASA TP-1663, 1982.
Theory. NASA TP-2018, 1982. 14. Powell, J.A.; Strazisar, A.J.; and Seasholtz, R.G.: Efficient Laser
6. Denton, J. D. : An Improved Time Marching Method for Turbomachinery Anemometer for Intra-Rotor Flow Mapping in Turbomachinery. J. Eng.
Calculation. ASME Paper 82-GT-239, Apr. 1982. Gas Turbines Power, vol. 103, no. 2, Apr. 1981. pp. 424-429.
7. Picrzga, M.J. ; and Wood, J.R.: Investigation of the Three-Dimensional 15. Strazisar, A.J.; and Powell, J.A. : Laser Anemometer Measurements in
Flow Field Within a Transonic Fan Rotor: Experiment and Analysis. a Transonic Axial Flow Compressor Rotor. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power,
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, vol. 107, no. 2, Apr. 1985, pp. 436-449. vol. 103, no. 2, Apr. 1981, pp. 430-437.
8. Wood, J.R.; Strazisar, A.J.; and Simonyi, P.S.: Shock Structure
16. Kline, S.J.: The Purpose of Uncertainty Analysis. J. Fluids Eng. vol.
Measured in a Transonic Fan Using Laser Anemometry. Transonic and 107, no. 2, June 1985, pp. 153-160.

17
TABLE I.--BLADE SURFACE COORDINATES ON SURFACES OF REVOLUTION

GEOMETRICAL INPUT FOR NASA ROTOR 67 AS REPORTED IN THE FOLLOWING PUBLICATIONS


I. PIERZGA AND WOOD, ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TUPdBINES
AND FOLIER, YOL. 107, NO. 2, APR. 1985, PP. 436-4/49.
2. STRAZISAR, ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POHER,
VOL. 107, NO. 2, APR 1985, PP.427-435.
3. WOOD, STRAZIS/kR, AND SIMONYI, PROCEEDINGS NO. 401 OF
AGARD CONFERENCE ON TRANSONIC AND SUPERSONIC PHENOMENA IN TURBOMACHIN_,
IIUNICH, SEPT. 1986.
THE FOLLOHING DATA IS GIVEN ON SURFACES OF REUOLUTION FROM A SUP,FACE AT THE HUB
TO ONE AT THE CASING OF THE MACHINE. THE TIP OF THE ROTOR t4AS I_SUREI) IN THE
STATIONARY, ASSEMBLED CONDITION TO BE A UNIFORM 0.1016 CENTIMETERS FROII THE
LASER ANF/IOMETRY WINDO_ _K41CH HAS MOLDED TO CONFORM TO THE CASING CONTOUR.
ACCORDING TO NASTRAN STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS, THE BI_'_DE TIP DEFORIIS SUCH THAT THE
DISTANCE FROM THE ROTOR TIP TO THE WINDOW CHANG_ I/ERY, I/FRY LITTLE.
CONSEQUENTLY, THE TIP OF THE ROTOR SHOULD BE OBTAINED BY SUBTRACTING 0.1016
CENTIMETER FROM THE CASING CONTOUR REPRESENTED BY SURFACE 14 ALONG A NORMAL
TO THE CASING CONTOUR. THE BLADE SURFACE COORDINATES GIUEN BELOW IN THE TABLE
ARE FOR BLADES HHICH ARE BLUNT AT THE LEADING AND TRAILING EDGES.
COORDINATES FOR CIRCLES HHICH ARE FITTED INTO THE BLADE SURFACES
AT THE LEADING AND TRAILING EDGES ARE GII/F.N BEFORE EACH SURFACE TABLE.
THE CIRCLES FIT IMTO THE BLADE IN A I_-'RIDIONAL (ALONG A R,Z LINE) AND
RADIUS_ANGULAR COORDINATE SURFACE. THE Z DISTANCE AT THE LEADING EDGE
AND TRAILING EDGE FOR POINTS I AND 35 REPRESENT THE MINIMUII AND MAXIh"JM
AXIAL EXTENTS FOR THE SURFACE.
NOTE: THE ROTOR HUB IS ROTATING FROM Z = -1.374 CM TO Z = 9.365 CM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> THE ROTOR HAS 22 BLADES <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

SYMBOLS
K LINE NUMBER
Z AXIAL COORDINATE (CENTIMETERS)
R RAD I AL COORD I NATES (CENT I METERS )
THSPI ANGULAR COORDINATE OF BLADE SUP.FACE i (RADIANS)
THSF2 ANGULAR COORDINATE OF BLADE SURFACE 2 (RADIANS)
TNPC THICKNESS NORMAL TO THE MEAN CAMBER LINE ON THE SURFACE (CENTIMETERS)
BETA ANGLE OF _ CAMBER LINE FROM THE MERIDIONAL DIRECTION (DEGREES)
BETA1 AN_'q.E OF BLADE SURFACE I FROM THE IIERIDIONAL DIRECTION (DEGREES)
BETA2 ANGLE OF BLADE SURFACE 2 FRON THE MERIDIONAL DIRECTION (DEGREES)

LINEAR DII_qqSIONS ARE IN CENTIIIETER_ _ND ANGULAR DIMENSIONS ARE IN RADIANS.


BETA = ARCTANGENT OF THE LOCAL RADIUS TIMES THE DERIVATIVE OF THE
ANGULAR COORDINATE WITH RESPECT TO THE It=RIDIONAL DISTANCE.

18
TABLE l.--Continued

SURFACE NUMBER 1 FROM THE HUB

LEADING EDGE AND TRAILING EDGE CIRCLE DATA


lEADING EDGE TRAILING EDGE
CIRCLE RADIUS 0.04498 0.04232
CIRCLE CENTER COORDINATES
RADIAL
9.57171 11.80840
AXIAL
0.04391 8.98787
MERIDIONAL 0.04498 9.28088
ANGULAR
0.00666 0.18551

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE 1


MERIDIONAL 0.01370 9.50555
ANGULAR 0.01004 0.18655

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE 2


MERIDIONAI 0.06864 9.27058
ANGULAR 0.00266 0.18003

K Z R THSPI THSP2 TNPC BETA BETA1 BETA2


1 0.00000 9.56278 0.00865 -0.00178 0.07810 38.47 44.11 51.80
2 0.27160 9.62407 0.05618 0.01615 0.15515 37.49 42.66 31.50
5 0.54378 9.68852 0.06189 0.05360 0.22232 55.78 40.43 50.52
4 0.81570 9.75592 0.08555 0.04974 0.29165 32.86 37.69 27.45
5 1.08754 9.82631 0.10657 0.06354 0.56457 50.51 55.77 24.61
6 1.55921 9.89964 0.12681 0.07647 0.45255 29.85 34.85 24.29
7 1.63072 9.97588 0.14576 0.08907 0.50011 27.85 52.10 25.21
8 1.90194 10.05495 0.16218 0.10056 0.56154 25.01 28.58 21.21
9 2.17294 10.13684 0.17671 0.11102 0.61268 23.10 26.27 19.78
10 2.44572 10.22147 0.18984 0.12075 0.65702 21.51 24.15 18.77
Ii 2.71419 10.30851 0.20160 0.12989 0.69554 19.83 21.87 17.73
12 2.98434 10.39669 0.21199 0.13854 0.72800 18.05 19.60 16.48
13 3.25408 10.48585 0.22112 0.14608 0.75476 16.41 17.52 15.29
14 3.52334 10.57497 0.22913 0.15318 0.77604 14.95 15.64 14.25
15 5.79207 10.66334 0.25615 0.15971 0.79224 13.54 13.76 15.32
16 4 06025 10.75022 0.24212 0.16572 0.80290 12.15 11.91 12.40
17 4 32773 10.83489 0.24719 0.17121 0.80865 10.80 10.17 11.44
18 4 59453 10.91671 0.25139 0.17618 0.80984 9.44 8.38 10.50
19 4 86060 10.99513 0.25470 0.18066 0.80601 8.06 6.56 9.56
20 5 12594 11.06985 0.25718 0.18465 0.79755 6.68 4.79 8.55
21 5 59054 11.14095 0.25887 0.18814 0.78469 5.28 3.00 7.55
22 5.65443 11.20855 0.25975 0.19115 0.76714 5.84 1.12 6.55
23 5.91761 11.27275 0.25981 0.19369 0.74472 2.55 -0.85 5.47
24 6.18010 11.33364 0.25905 0.19574 0.71768 0.76 -2.83 4.54
25 6.44192 11.39136 0.25746 0.19728 0.68542 -0.90 -4.92 3.12
26 6.70511 11.44597 0.25500 0.19830 0.64831 -2.67 -7.13 1.83
27 6.96369 11.49759 0.25164 0.19876 0.60604 -6.50 -9.40 0.47
28 7.22568 11.54628 0.24736 0.19867 0.55865 -6.41 -11.74 -0.96
29 7.48312 11.59217 0.24211 0.19799 0.50596 -8.45 -14.21 -2.47
30 7.74204 11.63531 0.23584 0.19670 0.44757 -10.62 -16.87 -4.09
51 8.00065 11.67577 0.22844 0.19475 0.38343 -12.88 -19.56 -5.84
32 8.25840 11.71563 0.21996 0.19211 0.31491 -15.I5 -22.08 -7.72
33 8.51592 11.74899 0.21024 0.18866 0.2409I -18.20 -25.59 -IO.I2
34 8.77309 11.78190 0.19869 0.18420 0.15866 -21.60 -29.58 -12.65
35 9.02991 11.81262 0.18550 0.17891 0.07122 -23.85 -32.17 -14.33

19
TABLE l.--Conlinued.

SURFACE NUMBER 2 FROM THE HUB

LEADING EDGE AND TRAILING EDGE CIRCLE DATA


LEADING EDGE TRAILING EDGE

CIRCLE RADIUS 0.04772 0.04384


CIRCLE CENTER COORDINATES
RADIAL 10.80878 12.82506
AXIAL 0.17245 8.94385
MERIDIONAL 0.04772 9.06074
ANGULAR 0.00301 0.22916

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE 1


9.07648
MERIDIONAL 0.01554
0.25255
ANGULAR 0.00609

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE 2


MERIDIONAL 0.07393 9.05888

ANGULAR -0.00068 0.Z2574

K Z R THSP1 THSP2 TNPC BETA BETA1 BETA2


1 0.12564 10.80027 0.00481 -0.00520 0.08251 40.23 45.80 33.56
2 0.39540 10.85464 0.03035 0.01132 0.16099 38.80 44.28 32.32
3 0.66593 10.91191 0.05422 0.02689 0.23869 36.82 42.09 30.71
4 0.93607 10.97189 0.07635 0.04163 0.30974 35.60 40.49 30.03
5 1.20601 11.03465 0.09725 0.05600 0.37716 34.04 38.55 29.00
6 1.47591 ll.lOOIO 0.11607 0.06915 0.44794 30.69 34.96 26.01
7 1.74533 11.16827 0.13256 0.08062 0.51030 28.41 32.56 23.90
8 2.01436 11.23908 0.14818 0.09153 0.56356 27.74 31.62 23.57
9 2.28303 11.51249 0.16285 0.10220 0.61444 26.41 29.55 23.09
I0 2.55120 11.38846 0.17605 0.11244 0.65859 24.60 27.01 22.09
II 2.81881 11.46653 0.18788 0.12203 0.69581 22.83 24.75 20.86
12 3.08578 11.54604 0.19852 0.13100 0.72638 21.29 22.74 19.81
13 3.35199 11.62632 0.20814 0.13944 0.75065 19.97 20.96 18.98
14 3.61736 11.70666 0.21684 0.14745 0.76918 18.77 19.26 18.27
15 3.88181 11.78639 0.22467 0.15504 0.78244 17.54 17.54 17.53
16 4.14529 11.86481 0.23164 0.16222 0.79042 16.33 15.89 16.78
17 4.40775 11.94128 0.23784 0.16899 0.79339 15.21 14.34 16.08
18 4.66919 12.01521 0.24332 0.17539 0.79160 14.12 12.79 15.42
19 4.92955 12.08609 0.24809 0.18143 0.78498 13.02 11.26 14.76
20 5.18890 12.15366 0.25219 0.18710 0.77400 11.91 9.74 14.04
21 5.44726 12.21795 0.25563 0.19241 0.75885 10.74 8.15 13.29
22 5.70471 12.27911 0.25841 0.19756 0.73921 9.54 6.52 12.52
23 5.96128 12.33722 0.26055 0.20195 0.71530 8 34 4.92 Ii.71
24 6.21702 12.39241 0.26206 0.20618 0.68728 7 09 3.24 10.88
25 6.47196 12.44475 0.26293 0.21004 0.65484 5 76 1.46 i0.00
26 6.72618 12.49433 0.26313 0.21353 0.61793 4 37 -0.37 9.05
27 6.97971 12.54124 0.26266 0.21663 0.57659 2 94 -2.23 8.07
28 7.23257 12 58554 0.26153 0.21934 0.53079 1 45 -4.16 7.03
29 7.48483 12 62734 0.25969 0.22164 0.48051 -0 15 -6.20 5.89
30 7.73650 12 66667 0.25712 0.22351 0.42546 -I 86 -8.41 4.73
31 7.98764 12 70363 0.25376 0.22496 0.36514 -3.56 -10.56 3.56
32 8.23827 12 73826 0.24970 0.22598 0.30095 -5.23 -12.52 2.23
33 8.48842 12 77066 0.24484 0.22646 0.23257 -7.64 -15.45 0.47
34 8.73813 12.80087 0.23872 0.22629 0.15648 -10.41 -18.95 -1.39
35 8.98742 12.82913 0.23151 0.22559 0.07423 -12.24 -21.23 -2.59

2O
TABLE I.--Continued.

SURFACE NUMBER 3 FROM THE HUB

LEADING EDGE AND TRAILING EDGE CIRCLE DATA


LEADING EDGE TRAILING EDGE
CIRCLE RADIUS 0.04439 0.04365
CIRCLE CENTER COORDINATES
RADIAL 12.04077 13.83842
AXIAL 0.53876 8.84911
MERIDIONAL 0.04439 8.75311
ANGULAR -0.00051 0.26877

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE 1


MERIDIONAL 0.01116 8.76006
ANGULAR 0.00194 0.27188

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE 2


MERIDIONAL 0.06904 8.75976
ANGULAR -0.00357 0.26565

K Z R THSP1 THSP2 TNPC BETA BETAI BETA2


i 0.29502 12 03391 0.00089 -0.00741 0.07426 42.02 48.52 33 85
2 0.56195 12 08119 0.02568 0.00752 0.16623 40.72 46.82 33 25
3 0.82913 12 13123 0 04861 0.02203 0.25090 38.91 44.32 32 52
4 1.09539 12 18389 0 06948 0.03600 0.32582 36 98 41.86 31 39
5 1.36100 12 23917 0 08865 0.04916 0.39500 35 18 39.78 29 98
6 1.62605 12 29704 0 10650 0.06167 0.45793 33 83 38.10 29 I0
7 1.89031 12 35745 0 12319 0.07571 0.51657 32 34 36.12 28 22
8 2.15377 12 42035 0 13847 0.08518 0.56990 30 57 33.78 27 12
9 2.41639 12.48572 0 15244 0.09607 0.61547 29 03 31.77 26 14
I0 2.67815 12.55347 0 16535 0.10647 0.65448 27 69 29.94 25 34
11 2.93896 12.62319 0 17725 0 11648 0.68696 26 43 28.13 24 69
12 3.19875 12.69428 0 18822 0 12612 0.71299 25 26 26 44 24.06
13 3.45743 12.76609 0 19834 0 13540 0.73331 24 13 24 82 23.44
14 3.71492 12.83802 0.20765 0 14432 0.74817 23.04 23 24 22.84
15 3.97115 12.90941 0.21621 0 15291 0.75732 22.07 21 81 22.33
16 4.22611 12.97968 0.22411 0 16120 0.76144 21.17 20 48 21.86
17 4.47980 13.04820 0.23139 0 16920 0.76111 20.27 19 14 21.38
18 4.73222 13.11445 0.25806 0 17692 0.75629 19.39 17 84 20.91
19 4.98342 13.17792 0.24416 0.18436 0.74724 18.53 16 58 20.43
20 5.23348 13.23841 0.24973 0.19152 0 73430 17.67 15 33 19.95
21 5.48244 13.29594 0.25478 0.19842 0 71744 16.78 14 02 19.47
22 5.73041 13.35065 0.25930 0.20506 0 69655 15.87 12.70 18.94
23 5.97748 13.40262 0.26334 0.21143 0 67217 14.94 11.43 18.34
24 6.22369 13 45194 0.26689 0.21752 0 64436 13.99 10.06 17.79
25 6 46912 13 49873 0.26994 0.22338 0 61244 12 99 8.61 17.22
26 6 71383 13 54304 0.27249 0.22896 0 57673 11 94 7.17 16 55
27 6 95791 13 58497 0.27455 0.23426 0 53744 10 86 5.68 15 86
28 7 20138 13 62455 0.27610 0.23930 0 49423 9 73 4.12 15 17
29 7 44429 13 66188 0.27715 0.24405 0 44709 8 54 2.49 14 40
30 7 68672 i3 69703 0 27766 0.24852 0.39594 7 27 0.77 13 59
31 7 92869 13 73005 0 27763 0.25269 0.34053 6 02 -0.92 12 79
32 8 I7023 I3 76099 0 27710 0.25658 0.28139 4 80 -2.52 11 96
33 8.41137 13.78993 0 27600 0.26014 0.21837 3 03 -4.84 10 80
34 8.65213 13.81693 0 27408 0.26328 0.14923 1 O0 -7.55 9 50
35 8.89254 13.84220 0 27145 0.26606 0.07468 -0 35 -9.34 8 66

21
TABLE
I --Continued

SURFACE NUMBER 6 FROM THE HUB

LEADING EDGE AND TRAILING EDGE CIRCLE DATA


LEADING EDGE TRAILING EDGE
CIRCLE RADIUS 0.04430 0.04098
CIRCLE CENTER COORDINATES
RADIAL 15.26852 14.84445
AXIAL 0.54245 8.69667
MERIDIONAL 0.04450 8.55879
ANGULAR -0.00505 0.50012

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE 1


MERIDIONAL 0.01028 8.55729
ANGULAR -0.00089 0.50288

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE 2


MERIDIONAL 0.06948 8.37222
ANGULAR -0.00578 0.29751

K Z R THSP1 THSP2 TNPC BETA BETAI BETA2

1 0.49865 15.26225 -0.00182 -0.00940 0.07501 63 42 50.21 54.69

2 0.75827 15.50521 0.02138 0.00425 0.16874 42 51 48.65 54.37

3 1.01760 15.36677 0.04294 0.01765 0.25592 40 76 46.37 34.01

4 1.27559 13.39281 0.06275 0.05076 0.33158 39 31 44.27 33.54

5 1.53254 13.44151 0.08115 0.04350 0.39903 37 91 42.39 32.82

6 1.78852 13.49221 0.09820 0.05585 0.46014 36 40 40.29 32 09

7 2.04350 13.54568 0.11395 0.06771 0.51525 34.97 38.39 31 24


8 2.29694 13.60105 0.12871 0.07912 0.56047 53.81 56.96 30 44
9 2.54940 13.65888 0.14263 0.09020 0 60145 32.89 35.46 30 15

i0 2.80065 15.71888 0.15565 0.10112 0 63579 51.81 55.69 29 86

11 5.05057 15.78067 0.16769 0.11175 0 66429 30.52 31.80 29 21

12 5.29915 15.86365 0.17885 0.12198 0 68554 29.46 30.30 28 60

15 3.54635 15.90750 0.18934 0.15190 0 70123 28.61 29.07 28.14

14 5.79214 15.97099 0.19921 0 14158 0 71202 27.84 27.87 27.82

15 4.03649 14.03416 0 20852 0 15103 0 71806 27.12 26.75 27.51

16 4.27945 16.09626 0 21728 0 16026 0.71989 26.41 25 59 27.22


17 4.52108 14.15672 0 22551 0 16928 0.71716 25.75 24 46 26.97
18 4 76145 14.21508 0 23325 0 17809 0.71015 25.08 23 45 26.66

19 5 00059 14 27089 0 24056 0 18669 0.69993 24.44 22 48 26.34

20 5 23868 14 32395 0 24744 0.19508 0.68625 23.78 21 42 26.07

21 5 47581 14 37431 0 25388 0.20350 0.66879 25.12 20 36 25.76


22 5 71206 16 42209 0 25995 0.21131 0.64805 22.45 19.56 25.41

25 5 94752 14 46741 0.26560 0.2191_ 0.62415 21 78 18.32 25.07

24 6 18229 14 51036 0.27088 0.22678 0.59709 21 06 17.21 24.71

25 6 41644 14 55104 0.27577 0.25624 0.56668 20 30 16.07 24.31

26 6.65004 14.58951 0.28028 0.24151 0.55305 19 54 14.95 25.88

27 6.88519 14.62586 0.28461 0.24859 0.49619 18 74 13.74 23.65


28 7.11590 14.66012 0.28815 0.25548 0.45581 17 9O 12.49 22 99

29 7.54826 14.69259 0.29152 0.26218 0.41207 17 04 11.27 22 48


30 7.58054 14.72273 0.29450 0.26868 0 36519 16 13 9.95 21 95

51 7.81217 16.75120 0,29708 0.27499 0 31447 15.20 8.56 21 44

52 8.06376 14.77785 0.29928 0.28110 0 26025 14.30 7.30 20 89

33 8.27518 14,80276 0.30107 0.28701 0 20275 13.08 5.52 20 21

34 8.50642 14.82596 0.30228 0.29267 0 15948 11.68 3.37 19 53

35 8.73768 14.84767 0.50298 0.29815 0 07043 10.74 1.89 19 ID

22
TABLE I --Continued.

SURFACE NUMBER 5 FROM THE HUB

LEADING EDGE AND TRAILING EDGE CIRCLE DATA


LEADING EDGE TRAILING EDGE
CIRCLE RADIUS 0.04139 0.05857
CIRCLE CENTER COORDINATES
RADIAL 16.49509 15.85104
AXIAL 0.76862 8.44629
MERIDIONAL 0.04159 7.86299
ANGULAR -0.00769 0.52026

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE 1


MERIDIONAL 0.00867 7.85565
ANGULAR -0.00594 0.52266

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE 2


MERIDIONAL 0.06627 7.88079
ANGULAR -0.00997 0.51811

K Z R THSP1 THSP2 TNPC BETA BETA1 BETA2


1 0.70765 14 48984 -0.00671 -0.01541 0.06790 45.64 52.27 56.97
2 0.95455 16 52551 0.01500 -0.00049 0.16016 44.65 50.77 36 85
3 1.20097 14 56548 0.05522 0.01252 0.24295 63.25 48.62 36 72
4 1.44588 14 60561 0 05589 0.02497 0.51362 42.03 66.76 36 48
5 1.68954 14 64591 0 07138 0.05759 0.57614 40.95 45.14 56 I0
6 1.93207 14 69027 0 08776 0.06957 0.65150 59 77 65.57 55 75
7 2.17524 14 75669 0 10510 0.06148 0.47857 58 70 41.86 55 24
8 2.41505 14 78510 0 11765 0.07507 0.52075 37 78 40.62 54 71
9 2.65149 14 85545 0 15141 0.08440 0.55765 56 92 59.26 54 45
10 2.88849 14.88764 0 14445 0.09553 0.58877 36 02 57.84 54 II
II 5.12601 14.94155 0 15671 0.10642 0.61669 35 13 56.51 55 7i
12 5.35798 14.99600 0 16852 0 11706 0.65466 54 55 55.29 53 59
15 5.59059 15.05112 0 17954 0 12769 0.64950 33 67 56.18 55 16
14 5.82126 15.10620 0 18985 0 15776 0.65959 53 07 35.16 32 98
15 4.05057 15.16071 0 19982 0 14781 0.66526 52 47 32.18 52 75
16 4.27842 15.21415 0 20955 0 15768 0.66720 51 90 31.22 32 57
17 4.50490 15.26601 0.21841 0 16740 0.66468 51 40 30.52 52 47
18 4.75011 15.51585 0.22709 0 17696 0.65858 50.92 29.52 52.28
19 4.95620 15.56529 0.25541 0 18656 0.66977 50.65 28.70 32. I0
20 5.17754 15.40815 0.24555 0 19562 0.65733 29.94 27.77 52.01
21 5.59969 15.65067 0.25095 0.20476 0.62145 29.42 26.92 51.80
22 5.62138 15.49041 0.25820 0.21574 0.60305 28.88 26.08 51.54
25 5.84249 15.52807 0.26515 0.22258 0.58147 28.36 25.12 31.57
24 6.06517 15.56556 0.27172 0.25151 0.55655 27.76 24 17 51.12
25 6.28551 15.59698 0.27800 0.25989 0 52881 27.16 25 25 50.82
26 6.50560 15.62840 0.28598 0.26855 0 49800 26.57 22 27 50.58
27 6.72551 15.65790 0.28966 0.25669 0 46599 25.95 21 22 50.50
28 6.94552 15.68554 0.29497 0.26489 0 42672 25.26 20 15 29.97
29 7 16515 15.71142 0.50001 0.27297 0 58624 26.60 19 13 29.65
50 7 58502 15.75560 0.50675 0.28092 0 34271 23.88 17 98 29.29
31 7 60299 15.75815 0.50915 0.28874 0 29568 23.16 16 80 28.96
32 7 82509 15.77915 0.51522 0.29645 0 24682 22.45 15 76 28.57
35 8 04359 15.79865 0.51699 0.30600 0 19093 21.56 14 27 28.19
54 8 26589 15.81669 0.52051 0.51165 0 15136 20.56 12 45 27.85
55 8 48456 15.83552 0.52522 0.51879 0 06591 19.82 II 17 27.62

23
TABLE l.--Continucd.

SURFACE NUMBER 6 FROM THE HUB

LEADING EDGE AND TRAILING EDGE CIRCLE DATA


LEADING EDGE TRAILING EDGE
CIRCLE RADIUS 0.03858 0.05696
CIRCLE CENTER COORDINATES
RADIAL 15.72496 16.80092
AXIAL 0.93490 8.15866
MERIDIONAL 0.03858 7.53092
ANGULAR -0.01682 0.53133

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE I


MERIDIONAL 0.00751 7.31886
ANGULAR -0.01338 0.35541

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE 2


MERIDIONAL 0.06622 7.35172
ANGULAR -0.01665 0.52951

K Z R THSPI THSP2 TNPC BETA BETAI BETA2


I 0.89664 15.72039 -0.01402 -0.02029 0.06502 48 69 54.16 41.70
2 1.12823 15.75080 0.00611 -0.00710 0.13980 47 80 52.88 41.50
3 1.35908 15.78316 0.02506 0.00592 0.20715 46 65 51.14 41.27
4 1.58806 15.81740 0.04272 0.01875 0.26561 45 63 49.62 40.99
5 1.81552 15.85568 0.05946 0.03128 0 31723 44 72 48.33 60 59
6 2.04155 15.89128 0.07531 0.04356 0 36389 43 85 47.10 40 20
7 2.26598 15.93078 0.09041 0.05559 0 60555 43 03 45.93 39 84
8 2.48884 15.97189 0.10480 0.06736 0 66268 42.25 44.81 59 45
9 2.71014 16 01453 0.11854 0.07887 0 47618 41.66 43.74 59 O0
10 2.92991 16 05862 0.15169 0.09010 0 50600 40.75 42.77 38 59
ii 3.16814 16 10381 0.14431 0.10109 0 53230 40.11 41.88 38 25
12 3.36688 16 14964 0.15644 0 11186 0 55540 39.51 40.98 37 96
13 3.58017 16 19563 0.16807 0 12265 0 57667 38.96 40.02 37 82
lfi 3.79410 16 24138 0.17919 0 15292 0 58887 38.41 59. O0 37 81
15 4.00676 16 28661 0 18986 0 14528 0 59822 37.92 58.13 37 71
16 4.21829 16 33029 0 20009 0 15350 0 60397 37.47 37.33 37 61
17 4.62880 16 37260 0 20995 0 16361 0 60556 37.05 36.47 37 61
18 4.63846 16 41299 0 21943 0 17564 0 60336 36.61 35.67 37 53
19 4.84737 i6 65Iii 0 22858 0 18356 0 59816 56.17 34.90 37.4i
20 5.05573 16 68683 0 23740 0 19335 0 58948 35.75 34.08 37.55
21 5.26363 16 52023 0 24590 0 20307 0 57734 35.31 35.26 37.27
22 5.67121 16 55145 0 25610 0 21271 0 56219 34.84 52.42 37.I3
23 5.67854 16 58061 0 26199 0 22225 0 54402 54.34 31 55 36.97
24 5.88576 16 60785 0 26958 0 23170 0.52259 53.83 30 64 36.79
25 6.09285 16 63324 0 27689 0.26106 0.69791 33.32 29 75 36.63
26 6 29997 16 65686 0 28391 0.25035 0.46992 32.80 28 80 36.47
27 6 50718 16 67880 0 29065 0.25955 0.63872 32.24 27 86 36.23
28 6 71657 16 69915 0 29712 0.26865 0.60664 31.66 26 91 35.96
29 6 92218 16 71791 0 30331 0.27767 0.36706 31.10 25 89 35.79
30 7 13011 16 73526 0.30923 0.28663 0.52585 30.48 24 81 35.55
31 7 33835 16 75119 0.31485 0.29549 0.28131 29.83 23 76 35.26
32 7 56697 16 76581 0.32021 0.30427 0.23321 29.26 22 74 35.02
33 7 75606 16 77919 0.32530 0.51299 0.18166 28.53 21 45 36.77
34 7 96559 16 79161 0.33002 0.32162 0.12492 27.68 19 95 34.66
35 8 17558 16 80261 0.33642 0.33017 0.06355 27.07 18 87 36.23

24
TABLE
I.--Continued.

SURFACE NUMBER 7 FROM THE HUB

LEADING EDGE AND TRAILING EDGE CIRCLE DATA


LEADING EDGE TRAILING EDGE
CIRCLE RADIUS 0.03590 0.03445
CIRCLE CENTER COORDINATES
RADIAL 16.95374 17.78734
AXIAL 1.13008 7.88870
MERIDIONAL 0.03590 6.85362
ANGULAR -0.01871 0.33918

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE 1


MERIDIONAL 0.00625 6.83849
ANGULAR -0.01751 0.34093

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE 2


MERIDIONAL 0.06176 6.87571
ANGULAR -0.02018 0.33770

Z R THSP1 THSP2 TNPC BETA BETAI BETA2


1.09442 16.94980 -0 01805 -0.02397 0.06251 51.61 55.68 46.16
1.30927 16.97540 0 00034 -0.01074 0.11912 50.71 56.72 45.88
1.52340 17.00255 0 01788 0.00228 0.17103 49.83 53.45 45.57
1.73591 17.05111 0 03454 0.01507 0.21718 49.07 52 39 45.25
1.94712 17.06108 0 05051 0 02761 0.25960 48.37 51 46 44.85
2.15715 17.09238 0 06587 0 03989 0.29900 47.66 50 53 44.45
2.36587 17.12495 0.08063 0 05192 0.33531 47.00 49 66 44.04
8 2.57333 17.15871 0.09486 0 06370 0.36892 46.38 48 86 43.66
9 2.77957 17.19360 0.10861 0 07525 0.39994 45.80 48 08 43.32
I0 2.98460 17.22957 0.12190 0 08659 0.42850 45.24 67 33 42.99
11 3.I8863 17.26630 0.13476 0 09771 0 45475 44.69 46 59 42.66
12 3 39108 17.30539 0.14720 0 10864 0 47861 44.16 45 84 42.39
13 3 59260 17.34047 0.15922 0.11941 0 49908 43.70 45.07 42.27
14 3 79304 17.37717 0.17083 0.13008 0 51517 43.32 44.32 42 30
15 3 99245 I7.61312 0.18205 0.14067 0 52797 42.88 43.52 62 24
16 6 19095 17.44795 0.i9288 0.15115 0 53727 42 43 42.69 42 17
17 4 38862 17 48131 0.20332 0.16156 0.54206 42 05 41.89 62 21
18 4 58558 17 51288 0.21341 0.17190 0.54292 41 67 41.12 42 22
19 4 78196 17 54240 0.22316 0.18218 0.54032 41 27 40.33 42 19
20 4 97787 17 56976 0.23259 0.19238 0.53421 40 86 39.52 42 15
21 5.17344 17 59505 0 24172 0.20252 0.52481 40 45 38.79 42 04
22 5.36878 17 61839 0 25058 0.21257 0.51262 40.05 38.04 41 94
23 5.56397 17 65992 0 25916 0.22258 0.49711 39.62 37 17 41.91
24 5.75911 17.65976 0 26746 0.23253 0.47833 39.16 36 35 41.75
25 5.95427 17.67802 0 27551 0.24240 0.45699 38.68 35 55 41.56
26 6.14955 17.69473 0 28330 0 2522I 0.43222 38.23 34 66 41.49
27 6.34504 17.71001 0 29083 0 26198 0 40400 57.75 33 78 41.34
28 6.54078 17.72389 0.29813 0 27169 0 37308 37.24 32 93 41.11
29 6.73685 17.73647 0.30518 0 28133 0 33893 36.75 32 02 40.97
30 6 93331 17.74779 0.51199 0 29094 0 30128 36.23 31 03 40.82
31 7 13020 17.75795 0.31854 0 30050 0 26015 35.69 30 06 40.62
32 7 32759 17.76698 0.32486 0.31001 0 21563 55.18 29 16 40.43
33 7 52553 17.77499 0.35095 0.31947 0 16792 34.60 2808 40.24
34 7 72406 17.78204 0.33675 0.32890 0 11590 33.93 26.80 40.04
35 7 92314 17.78827 0.34228 0.33828 0.05945 33.44 25.87 39.89

25
TABLE
l.--Continued.

SURFACE NUMBER 8 FROM THE HUB

LEADING EDGE AND TRAILING EDGE CIRCLE DATA


LEADING EDGE TRAILING EDGE
CIRCLE RADIUS 0.05259 0.03113
CIRCLE CENTER COORDINATES
RADIAL 18.17931 18.77914
AXIAL 1.34211 7.66226
MERIDIONA1 0.03239 6.38807
ANGULAR -0.01742 0.54319

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE 1


MERIDIONAL 0.00513
ANGULAR -0.01645

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE 2


MERIDIONAL 0.05689 6.40994
ANGULAR -0.01858 0.54201

K Z R THSP1 THSP2 TNPC BETA BETA1 BETA2

1 1.30989 18.17612 -0.01689 -0.02221 0.05725 53.64 57.31 49.20

2 1.50799 18.19705 -0.00003 -0.00957 0.10422 53.10 56 59 48.93

3 1.70553 18.21909 0.01623 0.00289 0.14808 52.45 55 67 48.67

4 1.90164 18.24214 0.03185 0.01517 0.18770 51.91 54 88 48.49


5 2.09661 18.26619 0.04694 0.02729 0.22409 51.38 54 13 48.26

6 2.29064 18.29114 0.06155 0.03923 0.25770 50.87 53 41 48.00

7 2.48358 18.31697 0.07570 0.05099 0.28865 50.37 52 72 47.77

8 2.67548 18 34360 0.08941 0.06258 0.31711 49.88 52 03 47.51

9 2.86641 18 37100 0.10272 0.07400 0.34329 49 41 51.41 47.24

10 3 05636 18 39909 0.11567 0.08525 0.36736 48 99 50.82 47.01

11 3 24537 18 42761 0.12828 0.09635 0.38929 48 59 50.24 46 82

12 3 43347 18 45622 0.14056 0.10730 0.40921 48 19 49.67 46 61

13 3 62070 18 48460 0.15252 0.11811 0.42734 47 80 49.13 46 39

14 3 80712 i8 51250 0.16418 0.12877 0.46365 47 42 48.58 46 20

15 3 99279 I8 53960 0.17556 0.13930 0 45748 47 ii 48.08 46 i0

16 417783 18.56558 0.18666 0.14978 0 46878 46 80 47.44 46 15

17 43623I 18.59019 0.19741 0.16023 0 47657 46.42 46.57 46 27

18 4,54633 I8.61314 0.20779 0 17065 0 47990 46.03 45.78 46 28

19 4.73004 18.63_26 0.21788 0 18102 0 48000 45.66 45.10 46 21

20 4.91351 18.65344 0.22768 0 19133 0 47715 45.27 44.35 46.16

21 5.09686 18.67081 0.23720 0 2O160 0 47092 44.89 43.60 46.12

22 5.28019 18.68646 0.24646 0 21184 0 46133 44.52 42.88 46.07

23 5.46359 18.70058 0.25549 0 22204 044889 44.15 42.18 45.99

24 5.64712 18.71326 0.26428 0 23220 0.43373 43.73 41.36 45.92

25 5.83084 18.72461 0 27280 0 24235 0.41506 43.30 40 52 45.84

26 6.01484 18.73468 0 28111 0 25245 0.39324 42.90 39 83 45.70

27 6.i9921 I8 74358 0 28921 026252 0.36891 42.48 39 03 45.60


28 6.38399 I8 75133 0 29708 0,27259 0.34111 42 04 38 13 45.52
29 6.56925 i8 75801 0 30473 0,28263 0.30987 41 61 37 33 45.39

30 6.75502 18 76367 0 31217 0.29265 0.27584 41 16 36 50 45.23

31 6.94138 18 76842 0 31940 0.30264 0.23865 40 68 35.61 45.09

32 7.12836 18 77229 032643 0.31261 0.19794 40 25 34.75 44.98

33 7.31600 18 77534 0.33325 0.32258 0.15385 39 78 33.79 44.87

34 7.50436 18 77766 0.33982 0.33255 0.10582 39 24 32.73 44.73

35 7.69339 18.77939 0.34619 0.34250 0.05391 38 84 31.94 44.62

26
TABLE I.--Continued.

SURFACE NUMBER 9 FROM THE HUB

LEADING EDGE AND TRAILING EDGE CIRCLE DATA


LEADING EDGE TRAILING EDGE
CIRCLE RADIUS 0.02884 0.02806
CIRCLE CENTER COORDINATES
RADIAL 19.40835 19.77011
AXIAL 1.53291 7.45266
MERIDIONAL 0.02884 5.94595
ANGULAR -0.01457 0.54455

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE I


MERIDIONAL 0.00414 5.92888
ANGULAR -0.01380 0.34548

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE 2


MERIDIONAL 0.05156 5.96709
ANGULAR -0.01548 0.34342

K Z R THSP1 THSP2 TNPC BETA BETA1 BETA2


1 1.50418 19.40593 -0.01415 -0.01888 0.05165 55.79 58.95 52.05
2 1.68586 19.42188 0.00129 -0.00687 0.09006 55.58 58 57 51.86
3 1.86715 19.43849 0.01629 0.00501 0.12599 54.90 57 67 51.69
4 2.04757 19.45572 0.05082 0.01677 0.15877 54.48 57 04 51.55
5 2.22680 19.47553 0.04494 0.02840 0.18914 54.04 56 43 51.34
6 2.40555 19.49185 0.05868 0.03988 0.21726 55.65 55 85 51.14
7 2.58552 19.51067 0.07207 0.05124 0.24330 55.24 55 31 50.95
8 2.76076 19.52991 0.08514 0.06246 0.26740 52.88 54 80 50.77
9 2.95729 19.54953 0.09791 0.07556 0.28966 52.55 54.31 50.59
10 5.11512 19.56949 0.11039 0.08454 0.51020 52.19 55.81 50.44
11 3.28850 19.58957 0.12259 0.09541 0.52885 51.87 55.55 50.30
12 3.46285 19.60948 0 13454 0.10618 0.54579 51.56 52.91 50.13
13 5.65680 19.62900 0 14627 0.11682 0.56150 51.29 52.56 49.94
14 5.81022 19.64793 0 15780 0.12756 0.57605 51.04 52.22 49.80
15 5.98515 19.66602 0 16912 0.15781 0.58942 50.77 51.75 49.74
16 4.15568 19.68506 0 18019 0.14820 0.40089 50.44 51.21 49.65
17 4.52787 19.69881 0 19102 0.15852 0.41042 50.13 50.75 49.52
18 4.49981 19.71507 0.20162 0.16877 0.41754 49.86 50.16 49.55
19 4.67160 19.72572 0.21196 0.17904 0.42118 49.57 49.45 49.68
20 4.84334 19.73669 0.22203 0.18933 0.42157 49.25 48.72 49.74
21 5.01509 19.74609 0.23185 0.19962 0.41815 48.89 48.02 49.75
22 5.18695 19.75406 0.26160 0.20989 0.41201 48.55 47.37 49.68
23 5.35899 19.76073 0.25076 0.22015 0.40313 48.20 46.69 49.62
24 5.55127 19.76622 0.25989 0.23040 0.39121 47.85 45.96 49.61
25 5.70588 19 77069 0.26881 0.24067 0.37586 47.50 45.22 49.60
26 5.87685 19 77411 0.27752 0.25094 0.35748 47.14 44.52 49.55
27 6.05027 19 77660 0.28603 0.26120 0.33643 46.77 43.79 49 45
28 6.22422 19 77818 0.29455 0.27147 0.51218 46.39 45.00 49 40
29 6.59873 19 77895 0.30267 0.28176 0.28442 46.03 42.24 49 57
50 6.57587 19 77895 0.31040 0.29207 0.25546 45.67 41.49 49 30
51 6.74968 19.77821 0.31816 0.30238 0.21957 45.27 40.69 49 20
52 6.92625 19.77689 0.32572 0.31271 0.18234 44.86 39.84 49 15
33 7.10356 19.77495 0.53308 0.32507 0.14144 44.45 38.93 49 07
54 7.28174 19.77251 0.54024 0.55544 0.09679 45.98 38.01 48.96
35 7.46075 19.76970 0.34725 0.34582 0.04874 45.65 37.34 48.86

27
TABLE
I.--Continued.

SURFACE NUMBER I0 FROM THE HUB

LEADING EDGE AND TRAILING EDGE CIRCLE DATA


LEADING EDGE TRAILING EDGE
CIRCLE RADIUS 0.02551 0.02504
CIRCLE CENTER COORDINATES
RADIAL 20.63824 20.76767
AXIAL 1.71889 7.25209
MERIDIONA1 0.02551 5.56567
ANGULAR -0.01099 0.54448

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE 1


MERIDIONAL 0.00332 5.52864
ANGULAR -0.01038 0.34537

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE 2


MERIDIONAL 0.06627 5.56533
ANGULAR -0.01171 0.36376

K Z R THSPI THSP2 TNPC BETA BETA1 BETA2

I 1.69343 20.63673 -0.01066 -0.01685 0.06614 57.72 60.45 56.49

2 1.86159 20.66726 0.00365 -0.00363 0.07852 57.60 60.01 54.55

3 2.02959 20.65810 0.01760 0.00791 0.10882 57.06 59.49 54.27

4 2.19675 20.66920 0.03123 0.01918 0.13650 56.79 59.05 54.22

5 2.56335 20.68054 0.04658 0.03036 0.16244 56.69 58.62 54.10

6 2.52965 20.69208 0.05767 0.06146 0.18658 56.21 58.18 54.01

7 2.69696 20.70575 0.07048 0.05268 0.20880 55.93 57.76 55.91

8 2.85994 20.71555 0.08305 0.06540 0.22952 55.66 57.38 53.78

20.72740 0.09538 0.07425 0.26861 55.42 56.99 53.72


9 3.02438
20.73929 0.10749 0.08504 0.26592 55.18 56.62 53.64
i0 3.18829
II 3.35172 20.75104 0.1194O 0.09574 0.28215 54.94 56.29 53.49

12 3.51666 20.76261 0.13112 0.10635 0.29727 54.69 55.91 53.40

20.77324 0.14263 0.11689 0.31045 56.50 55.60 53.34


I3 3.67715
14 3.83922 20.78342 0.15400 0.12738 0.32264 54.35 55.38 53.27

15 4.00093 20.79277 0.16521 0.13781 0.33389 54.12 56.97 53.23

16 6.16254 20.80113 0.17620 0.16820 0.34388 53.81 54.51 53.09

20.80835 0.18701 0.15847 0.35310 53.52 54.21 52.81


17 4.32349
20.81427 0.19769 0.16864 0.36099 55.33 53.89 52.76
18 4.68665
19 4.64530 20.81882 0.20819 0.17884 0.36638 53.16 53.39 52.92

20 6.80613 20.82195 0.21847 0 18909 0.36910 52.88 52.71 53.06

21 4.96699 20.82378 O.22848 0 19937 0.36896 52.50 51.95 53.06

20.82443 0.23822 0 20962 0.36585 52.10 51.22 52.95


22 5.12796
23 5.28908 20.82608 0.26774 0 21987 0.35907 51.77 50.54 52.94

20 82281 0.25704 0 23015 0.36922 51.65 49.88 52.91


24 5.65046
25 5.61212 20 82077 0.26615 0 26O39 0.33683 51.10 49.21 52.84
20 81795 0.27506 0.25065 0.32152 50.76 48.50 52.79
26 5.77414
27 5.93657 20 81642 0.28377 0.26092 0.30308 50.40 47.79 52.76

28 6.09965 20 81021 0.29230 0.27121 0.28158 50.07 47.09 52.72

20 80539 0.30064 0.28153 0.25707 49.75 46.37 52.68


29 6.26286
2080002 0.30881 0.29186 0.22948 69 38 45.65 52.62
30 6.62685
31 6.59165 20.79413 0.31681 0.30222 0.19888 49 05 44.94 52.57

20.78780 0.32665 0.31261 0.16512 48 73 44.21 52.56


32 6.75672
33 6.92273 20.78104 0.33232 0.32305 0.12797 48 60 63.44 52.56

34 7.08952 20.77596 0.33983 0.33354 0.08736 68 07 62.67 52.53

35 7.257ii 20.76666 0.36719 0.36407 0.06362 47 82 42.11 52.69

28
TABLE l.--Continued.

SURFACE NUMBER II FROM THE HUB

LEADING EDGE AND TRAILING EDGE CIRCLE DATA


LEADING EDGE TRAILING EDGE
CIRCLE RADIUS 0.02261 0.02213
CIRCLE CENTER COORDINATES
RADIAL 21.86462 21.77237
AXIAL 1.92608 7.07234
MERIDIONAL 0.02261 5.17386
ANGULAR -0.00572 0.34408

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE 1


MERIDIONAL 0.00259 5.15805
ANGULAR -0.00524 0.34479

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE 2


MERIDIONAL 0.04153 5.19196
ANGULAR -0.00629 0.34350

K Z R THSPI TNSP2 TNPC BETA BETAI BETA2


1 1 90349 21.86391 -0.00546 -0.00919 0 04099 59.79 62 31 56.83
2 2 05877 21.86906 0.00798 0.00166 0 07006 59.54 61 94 56.74
3 2 21409 21.87419 0.02119 0.01249 0 09716 59.31 61 54 56.75
4 2 56862 21.87927 0.03415 0.02328 0 12187 59.16 61 24 56.79
5 2 52262 21.88432 0.04689 0.03403 0 14520 58.95 60 90 56.74
6 2 67632 21.88921 0.05942 0.04474 0 16676 58.75 60 54 56.74
7 Z 82955 21.89395 0.07174 0.05542 0 18644 58.55 60 22 56.71
8 2 98230 21.89850 0.08386 0.06602 0 20502 58.34 59.91 56.61
9 3 13472 21.90282 0.09579 0.07658 0 22193 58.16 59.58 56.63
10 3 28676 21.90686 0.10754 0.08713 0 23697 58.00 59.28 56.62
11 3 43843 21.91051 0.11914 0.09762 0 25122 57.80 59.00 56.51
12 3 58981 21.91357 0.15056 0.10805 0 26436 57.59 58.66 56.46
13 3 74090 21.91595 0.14181 0.11845 0 27564 57.42 58.36 56.44
14 3 89172 21.91762 0.15293 0.12881 0 28581 57.27 58.12 56 37
15 6 04237 21.91847 0.16392 0.13913 0 29518 57.08 57.81 56 33
16 4 19286 21.91841 0.17475 0.14943 0 30332 56.87 57.49 56 24
17 4 34325 21.91736 0.18546 0.15966 0 31067 56.67 57.23 56 09
18 4 49360 21.91519 0.19607 0.16986 0 31673 56.53 56.96 56 09
19 4 64396 21.91190 0.20654 0.18008 0 32146 56.33 56.54 56 11
20 4 79441 21.90747 0.21685 0.19029 0 32518 55.98 55.95 56 02
21 4 94500 21.90202 0.22688 0.20048 0 32656 55.62 55.52 55 92
22 5 09576 21.89568 0.23673 0.21065 0 32506 55.29 54.67 55 89
23 5 26679 21.88861 0.24634 0.22086 0 32005 54.98 53.96 55 95
24 5 39811 21.88092 0.25573 0.23111 0 31184 54.66 53.26 55 92
25 5 54977 21.87274 0.26492 0.24135 0 30130 54.25 52.58 55 79
26 5 7018I 21.86406 0.27391 0.25157 0 28813 53.86 51.88 55 67
27 5 85430 21.85495 0.28270 0.26178 0 27198 53.50 51.16 55 61
28 6 00723 21.84540 0.29130 0.27202 0 25267 53.14 50.42 55 55
29 6 16069 21.83549 0.29971 0.28226 0 23063 52.74 49.69 55 42
30 6 31471 21.82526 0.30793 0.29249 0 20610 52.31 48.92 55 25
31 6.46934 21.81477 0.31597 0.30270 0 17859 51.90 48.15 55 12
32 6.62456 21.80402 0.32384 0.31292 0 14792 51.58 47.48 55 06
33 6.78049 21.79309 0.33156 0.32317 0 11446 51.26 46.78 55 O0
34 6.93709 21.78201 0.33913 0.33345 0 07804 50.91 46.05 54 94
35 7.09442 21.77090 0.34657 0.34376 0.03878 50.66 45.52 54 89

29
TABLE
l.--Continued

SURFACE NUMBER 12 FROM THE HUB

LEADING EDGE AND TRAILING EDGE CIRCLE DATA


LEADING EDGE TRAILING EDGE
CIRCLE RADIUS 0.02044 0.01989
CIRCLE CENTER COORDINATES
RADIAL 25.09180 22.77915
AXIAL 2.15059 6.92447
MERIDIONAE 0.02044 4.82790
ANGULAR 0.00051 0.34246

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE I


MERIDIONAL 0.00205 4.81521
ANGULAR 0.00070 0.54505

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE 2


MERIDIONAL 0.05795 4.84444
ANGULAR -0.00015 0.34197

K Z R THSPI THSP2 TNPC BETA BETA1 BETA2


1 2.10996 25.09181 0 00051 -0 00288 0 05704 61.78 64.15 58.97
2 2.25221 25.09166 0 01516 0 00736 0 06377 61.60 65.88 58.95
3 2.59458 23.09111 0 02565 0 01759 0 08885 61.47 63.59 59.00
6 2.53657 25.09021 0 05796 0 02784 0 11183 61.39 65.37 59.15
5 2.67780 23 08891 0 05010 0 03810 0 13541 61.24 65 09 59.14
6 2.81908 23 08714 0 06208 0 04834 o 15555 61.07 62 79 59.14
7 2.96006 23 08490 0 07589 0.05856 0 17191 60.93 62 51 59.18
8 3.10076 25 08214 0 08554 0.06879 0.18854 60.81 62 24 59.25
9 3.24129 23 07883 0 09705 0.07902 0.20372 60.68 62 00 59.24

10 3.38162 23 07494 0.10843 0.08924 0.21781 60.54 61 74 59.23


Ii 3.52183 25 07059 0.11968 0.09946 0.25052 60.39 61 46 59.24
12 3.66190 25 06505 0.15079 0.10966 0.24189 60.24 61 20 59.21
13 5.80190 25.05891 0.14178 0.11985 0.25208 60.10 60 96 59.19
14 3.94185 23.05199 0.15268 0.15005 0.26100 59.98 60 72 59.20
15 4.08181 25.04428 0.16546 0.14025 0.26908 59.80 60.41 59.17
16 4.22181 23.05574 0.17412 0.15045 0.27584 59 64 60.17 59.09
17 4.56190 25.02652 0.18472 0.16060 0.28152 59 54 60.03 59.04
18 4.50212 25.01605 0.19525 0.17079 0.28645 59 42 59.71 59.12

19 4.6_252 23.00488 0.20564 0.18104 0.28991 59 18 59.27 59 10


20 4.78316 22.99290 0.21589 0.19124 0.29292 58 88 58.90 58 85
21 4.92404 22.98018 0.22601 0.20159 0.29448 58 65 58.48 58 78
22 5.06525 22.96689 0.23597 0.21160 0.29353 58 37 57.89 58 84
23 5.20680 22.95517 0.24569 0.22184 0 29040 57 97 57.10 58 80
24 5.54871 22.95912 0.25514 0.23208 0 28456 57 49 56.21 58 68
25 5.49105 22.92491 0.26431 0.24229 0 27507 56.98 55.57 58 47
26 5.63381 22.91046 0.27325 0 25244 0 26504 56.51 54.62 58 22
27 5.77708 22.89587 0.28198 0 26255 0 24856 56.05 53.87 58 O0
28 5.92085 22.88112 0.29051 0 27262 0 23121 55.60 53.08 57 84
29 6.06517 22.86630 0 29883 0 28267 0 21104 55.17 52.51 57 67
30 6.21006 22.85141 0 50696 0 29270 0 18838 54.68 51.47 57 65
31 6.55557 22.83649 0 51487 0 50268 0 16500 54.15 50.58 57 20
32 6.50172 22.82159 0 32259 0 51265 0 15465 53.70 49.80 56.98
33 6.64854 22.80670 0 55014 0 52253 0 10594 53.20 48.98 56.72
54 6.79606 22.79193 0 33750 0 33238 0.07075 52.66 48.12 56.43
55 6.94427 22.77728 0 34471 0 54219 0.03503 52.29 47.51 56.25

3O
TABLE
l.--Continued

SURFACE NUMBER 13 FROM THE HUB

LEADING EDGE AND TRAILING EDGE CIRCLE DATA


LEADING EDGE TRAILING EDGE
CIRCLE RADIUS 0.01909 0.01826
CIRCLE CENTER COORDINATES

RADIAl 24.32150 25.78459


AXIAL 2.31965 6.77260
MERIDIONAL 0.01909 4.50683
ANGULAR 0.00482 0.55888

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE I


MERIDIONAL 0.00166 4.49519
ANGULAR 0.00514 0.55959

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE 2


MERIDIONAL 0.05578 4.52212
ANGULAR 0.00445 0.35846

K Z R THSPI THSP2 TNPC BETA BETA1 BETA2


1 2.50058 24.52251 0.00498 0.00178 0.05451 65.69 65.95 60.99
2 2.42980 24.51662 0.01685 0.01157 0.05926 65.56 65.74 61.00
3 2.55904 24.51026 0.02859 0.02100 0.08259 65.50 65.55 61.Iq
4 2.68777 24.50322 0.04020 0.05065 0.10369 65.47 65.37 61.27
5 2.81622 24.29546 0.05170 0.04052 0.12395 65.57 65.17 61.51
6 2.94454 24.28690 0.06509 0.05002 0.14269 63.50 64.96 61.45
7 5.07271 24.27759 0.07457 0.05976 0.15962 63.25 64.77 61.55
8 5.20079 24.26741 0.08555 0.06954 0.17554 65.18 64.59 61.61
9 5.32881 24.25641 0.09665 0.07956 0.18985 63.09 64.56 61.69
I0 3.45682 24.24451 0.10763 0.08921 0.20296 62.98 64.13 61.72
11 5.58495 24.25166 0.11855 0.09908 0.21699 62.88 63.96 61.72
12 5.71519 24.21780 0.12941 0.10899 0.22590 62.81 63.78 61.78
15 5.84160 24.20500 0.14019 0.11895 0.25569 62.71 65.55 61.82
14 5.97031 24.18755 0.15091 0.12896 0.24437 62.60 65.52 61.84
15 4.09953 24.17091 0.16156 0.15901 0.25172 62.50 65.09 61.88
16 4.22868 24.15369 0.17215 0.14912 0.25796 62.57 62.85 61.88
17 4.55848 24.15576 0.18268 0.15926 0.26550 62.21 62.61 61.80
18 4.4a875 24.11715 0.19514 0.16941 0.26840 62.05 62.54 61.72
19 4.61948 24.09789 0.20557 0.17959 0.27151 61.97 62.2_ 61.69
20 4.75076 24.07809 0.21405 0.18984 0.27551 62.01 62.26 61.77
21 4.88261 24.05789 0.22451 0.20020 0.27555 61.88 61.75 62.01
22 5.01502 24.05741 0.25469 0.21072 0.27476 61.52 60.95 62.06
23 5.14801 24.01685 0.24465 0.22121 0.27267 61.02 60.31 61.70
24 5.28159 23.99625 0.25435 0.25160 0.26964 60.37 59.20 61.47
25 5.41575 23.97581 0.26556 0.24198 0.26167 59.63 57.86 61.25
26 5.55048 23.95546 0.27244 0.25221 0.25045 58.88 56.91 60.64
27 5.68580 25.95527 0.28105 0.26225 0.25745 58.15 55.92 60.15
28 5.82174 25.91525 0.28957 0.27219 0.22095 57.47 54.82 59.78
29 5.95829 25.89545 0.29741 0.28202 0.20125 56.83 55.88 59.38
30 6.09545 25.87585 0.50523 0.2917_ 0.17954 56.16 52.91 58.95
51 6.25524 23.85655 0.31279 0.50134 0.15490 55.47 51.87 58.52
52 6.37166 23.85752 0.52015 0.31085 0.12762 54.85 50.95 58.15
55 6.51070 25.81879 0.32726 0.52022 0.09815 54.17 49.94 57.68
54 6.65059 25.80042 0.55417 0.52949 0.06650 55.47 48.92 57.21
35 6.79072 25.78241 0.54090 0.35866 0.05212 52.98 48.22 56.88

3!
TABLE
l.--Concluded.

SURFACE NUMBER 14 FROM THE HUB

LEADING EDGE AND TRAILING EDGE CIRCLE DATA


LEADING EDGE TRAILING EDGE

CIRCLE RADIUS 0.01891 0.01874


CIRCLE CENTER COORDINATES
RADIAL 25.55194 24.78156
AXIAl 2.50380 6.56211
MERIDIONAL 0.01891 4.15251
ANGULAR 0.00685 0.33427

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE I


MERIDIONAL 0.00157
ANGULAR 0.00711

COORDINATES FOR TANGENCY POINTS ON BLADE SURFACE 2


4.16856
MERIDIONAL 0.05579
0.55588
ANGULAR 0.00650

K Z R THSP1 THSP2 TNPC BETA BETA1 BETA2


1 2.48498 25.55568 0.00698 0.00373 0.05399 65.83 68.02 63.19
2 2.59766 25.54294 0.01790 0.01250 0.05680 65.72 67.85 65.21
5 2.71050 25.55110 0.02875 0.02150 0.07810 65.70 67.67 63.37
4 2.82239 25.51820 0.03947 0.03016 0.09773 65.72 67.58 65.55
5 2.95420 25.50421 0.05014 0.05905 0.11658 65.66 67.45 63.61
6 3.04601 25.48901 0.06074 0.04800 0.13408 65.63 67.26 65.76
7 5.15778 25.47265 0.07128 0.05702 0.14999 65.60 67.11 65.90
8 5.26951 25.45497 0.08176 0.06610 0.16516 65.54 66.96 63.95
9 5.58148 25.45610 0.09221 0.07523 0.17955 65.47 66.79 64.00
i0 5.49575 25.41592 0.10265 0.08445 0.19223 65.42 66.62 64.09
ii 5.60655 25.59445 0.11505 0.09375 0.20441 65.53 66.44 64.11
12 5.71944 25.57167 0.12339 0.10511 0.21575 65.21 66.20 64.14
13 5.83514 25.34776 0.15375 0.11257 0.22567 65.11 66.00 64.16
14 5.94753 25.52285 0.14407 0.12211 0.23482 65.02 65.86 64.14
15 4.06271 25.29713 0.15443 0.13173 0.24354 64.91 65.64 64.14
16 4.17870 25.27066 0.16475 0.14144 0.25090 64.79 65.38 64.18
17 4.29564 25.24561 0.17507 0.15127 0.25671 64.71 65.19 64.21
18 4.41558 25.21605 0.18541 0.16120 0.26189 64.59 64.98 64.19
19 4.55252 25.18811 0.19575 0.17122 0.26612 64.49 64.80 64.17
20 4.65254 25.15993 0.20615 0.18135 0.26882 64.46 64.69 64.23
21 4.77368 25.15164 0.21655 0.19160 0.27160 64.51 64.57 64.25
22 4.89591 25.10541 0.22686 0.20195 0.27331 64.11 64.14 64.07
25 5.01924 25.07558 0.23729 0.21224 0.27511 64.05 64.25 65.82
24 5.14574 25.04776 0.24774 0.22267 0.27512 64.01 65.59 64.45
25 5.26935 25.02060 0.25778 0.23358 0.26845 63.68 62.31 64.95
26 5.39601 24.99590 0.26741 0.24452 0.26154 62.81 61.20 64.25
27 5.52574 24.96770 0.27666 0.25514 0.25402 61.79 59.80 63.55
28 5.65255 24.94205 0.28540 0.26564 0.24031 60.82 58.08 63.15
29 5.78232 24.91689 0.29566 0.27598 0.22140 59.82 56.57 62.54
30 5.91310 24.89253 0.30154 0.28612 0.19872 58.84 55.18 61.86
51 6.04486 24.86839 0.50909 0.29604 0.17237 57.90 55.82 61.23
32 6.17751 24.84505 0.51632 0.30579 0.14239 57.02 52.52 60.65
33 6.31105 24.82231 0.52327 0.31538 0.10910 56.11 51.12 60.08
54 6.44543 24.80022 0.52990 0.52480 0.07220 55.15 69.68 59.45
55 6.58063 24.77884 0.53627 0.33406 0.03197 54.42 48.65 58.94

32
TABLE II.--INNER AND OUTER FLOWPATH COORDINATES

K Z R HUB R SHROUD K Z R HUB R SHROUD


1 -18.05981 9.16263 25.69380 41 9.02989 11.81286 24.51726
2 -17. 58257 9.13694 25.69502 42 9.70713 11.88601 24.47249
3 -16.70552 9.11110 25.69606 43 10.38437 11.95076 24.43715
4 -16. 02809 9.08530 25.69690 44 11.06161 12.01159 24.41084
5 -15.55085 9.05977 25.69756 45 11.73885 12.07301 24.39322
6 -14.67561 9.03473 25.69798 46 12.41610 12.13859 24.38387
7 -15.99657 9.01039 25.69821 47 13.09333 12.20953 24.38176
8 -13.31913 8.98698 25.69824 48 13.77056 12.28665 24.38327
9 -12.64188 8.96473 25.69804 49 14.44781 12.37076 24.38435
10 -II .96464 8.94385 25.69763 50 15.12507 12.46268 24.38408
11 -ii .28739 8.92453 25.69701 51 15.80229 12.56321 24.38383
12 -10.61015 8.90693 25.69615 52 16.47954 12.67077 24.38394
13 -9.93291 8.89121 25.69508 53 17.15677 12.77743 24.38408
14 -9.25567 8.87769 25.69377 54 17.83401 12.87424 24.38414
15 -8. 578_3 8.86747 25.69223 55 18.51125 12.95222 24.38414
16 -7.90118 8.86182 25.69044 56 19.18851 13.00243 24.38409
17 -7.22394 8.86201 25.68843 57 19.86575 13.02487 24.38399
18 -6. 54670 8.86932 25.68617 58 20.54298 13.03990 24.38382
19 -5.86946 8.88502 25.68367 59 21.22025 13.05056 24.38364
20 -5. 19221 8.91040 25.68091 60 21.89746 13.05828 24.38345
21 -4.51497 8.94672 25.67789 61 22.57472 13.06386 24.38329
22 -3.83773 8.99527 25.67462 62 23.25197 13.06740 24.38315
23 -3. 16048 9.05731 25.67108 63 23.92920 13.06903 24.38306
24 -2. 48324 9.13414 25.66730 64 24.60646 13.06884 24.38303
25 -I .80600 9.22699 25.66324 65 25.28368 13.06695 24.38301
26 -1. 12875 9.33708 25.65891 66 25.96094 13.06346 24.38303
27 -0.45151 9.46554 25.65430 67 26.63817 13.05847 24.38307
28 0. 22573 9.61263 25.64807 68 27.31541 13.05209 24.38310
29 0.90297 9.77807 25.63542 69 27.99268 13.04443 24.38315
30 1.58021 9.96160 25.61099 70 28.66989 13.03558 24.38319
31 2.25746 10.16295 25.56900 71 29.34715 13.02566 24.38321
32 2.93470 10.37995 25.50014 72 30.02438 13.01477 24.38321
33 3.61194 10.60335 25.39339 73 30.70163 13.00301 24.38321
34 4.28918 10.82219 25.24631 74 31.37886 12.99049 24.38321
35 4.96643 11.02556 25.08638 75 32.05611 12.97732 24.38321
36 5.64367 11.20660 24.94333 76 32.73337 12.96361 24.38319
37 6.32091 11.36588 24.82292 77 33.41060 12.94945 24.38319
38 6.99816 11.50476 24.72263 78 34.08784 12.93495 24.38319
39 7.67540 11.62462 24.63994 79 34.76508 12.92022 24.38319
40 8.35264 11.72681 24.57231 80 35.44234 12.90536 24.38319

33
TABLE III.--AERODYNAMIC SURVEY DATA

(a) Near stall operating point

STATION i (UPSTREAM OF ROTOR)

T REF. = 288.15 K
P REF. = 101325 NT/METER SQUARED;
FLOH ANGLE IS FROM THE MERIDIONAL DIRECTION
RADIUS OF SHROUD 25.654 C_NTIMETERS
9.1465 CENTIMETERS
RADIUS OF HUB
-2.473 CENTIMETERS
AXIAL DISTANCE FROM ROTOR HUB LEADING EDGE
32.305 KG/SECOND
MASS FLOW RATE MEASURED WITH ORIFICE
0.8390 _ P REF.
STATIC PRESSURE ON THE SHROUD
0.8764 _ P REF.
STATIC PRESSURE ON THE HUB

P STATIC/ FLOW ANGLE


RADIUS P TOTAL/ T TOTAL/
P REF. (DEGREES)
(CENTIMETERS) P REF. T REF.
0.8543 1.7
25.5194 0.9223 1.0089
0.8563 1.5
25.3848 0.9454 0.9956
0 8543 0.0
25.2501 0.9610 1.0015
0 B543 I.I
25.1130 0.9745 1.0035
0 8543 0.6
24.9758 0.9813 1.0041
0 8509 -0.I
24.2570 0.9908 1.0050
0 8462 0.0
23.4798 0.9942 1.0054
0 8401 0.0
22.6873 0.9955 1.0042
0.8247 0.0
21.1988 1.0016 0.9994
0.8213 0.0
19.6469 1.0016 0.9992
0.8206 0 0
18.0645 1.0016 0.9987
0.8234 0 0
16.4414 1.0010 0.9990
0.8315 0 1
14.7396 1.0023 0.9987
0.8_17 0 0
12.9591 1.0023 0.9992
0.8581 0 0
11.0084 1.0016 0.9985
0.8750 1 3
10.0736 0.9969 0.9998
0.8777 0 8
9.8882 0.9908 1.0008
0.8790 0 7
9.7028 0.9779 1.0013
0.8784 0.9
9.5174 0.9582 1.0006

STATION 2 (DOWNSTREAM OF ROTOR)

24.4043 CENTIMETERS
RADIUS OF SHROUD
12.0167 CENTIMETERS
RADIUS OF HUB
II.011 CENTIMETERS
AXIAL DISTANCE FROM ROTOR HUB LEADING EDGE
ENERGY AVERAGED TOTAL PRESSURE RATIO ACROSS ROTOR 1.728
1.188
MASS AVERAGED TOTAL TEMPERATURE RATIO ACROSS ROTOR
0.901
ROTOR ADIABATIC EFFICIENCY
1.3630 _ P REF.
STATIC PRESSURE ON THE SHROUD
1.0336 _ P REF.
STATIC PRESSURE ON THE HUB

STATIC/ FLOW ANGLE


RADIUS P TOTAL/ T TOTAL/
P REF. (DEGREES)
(CENTIMETERS) P REF. T REF.
1.3691 45.2
23.2258 1.7937 1.2269
1.3242 43.6
22.0320 1.7665 1.2059
1 2997 43.3
20.8280 1.7433 1.1936
1 2752 41.8
19.6164 1.7243 1.1754
1 2493 43.8
18.3947 1.7011 1.1737
1 2235 45.1
17.1526 1.6821 1.1689
1 1922 47.6
15.8902 1.6991 1.1716
1 1500 50.2
14.6126 1.6889 1.1708
I 1017 51.5
13.3299 1.6773 1.1641

34
TABLE IIl.--Concluded.

(b) Near peak efficiency operating point

STATION I (UPSTREAM OF THE ROTOR)

P REF.
= 101525 NT/METER SQUARED; T REF. = 288.15 K
FLOH ANGLE IS FROM THE MERIDIONA1 DIRECTION
RADIUS OF SHROUD
25.656 CENTIMETERS
RADIUS OF HUB
9.1465 CENTIMETERS
AXIAL DISTANCE FROM ROTOR HUB LEADING EDGE -2.475 CENTIMETERS
MASS FLOW RATE MEASURED WITH ORIFICE 54.575 KG/SECOND
STATIC PRESSURE ON THE SHROUD
0.8077 _ P REF.
STATIC PRESSURE ON THE HUB
0.8515 _ P REF.

RADIUS P TOTAL/ T TOTAL/ P STATIC/ FLOW ANGLE


(CENTIMETERS) P REF. T REF. P REF. (DEGREES)
25.5194 0.9094 1.0012 0.8226 1.5
25.5848 0.9558 0.9990 0.8219 0.5
25.2501 0.9569 1.0015 0.8205 0.5
25.1150 0.9704 1.0010 0.8205 0._
24.9758 0.9806 1.0012 0.8185 0.7
24.2570 0.9982 1.0010 0.8158 0.9
25.4798 0.9996 1.0008 0.8085 0.5
22.6875 1.0005 1.0010 0.7995 0.0
21.1988 1.0005 1.0000 0.7941 0.0
19.6469 1.0005 0.9994 0.7921 0.0
18.0645 1.0010 0.9994 0.7914 0.0
16.4414 1.0005 0.9994 0.7921 0.0
14.7596 1.0010 1.0004 0.7982 0.0
12.9591 1.0010 0.9996 0.8084 0.0
11.0084 1.0003 0.9994 0.8274 0.0
10.0756 0.9948 1.0015 0.8585 1.0
9.8882 0.9855 1.0019 0.8410 0.6
9.7028 0.9690 1.0015 0.8450 0.6
9.5174 0.9459 1.0015 0.8444 1.1

STATION 2 (DOWNSTREAM OF ROTOR)

RADIUS OF SHROUD
24.4043 CENTIMETERS
RADIUS OF HUB
12.0167 CENTIMETERS
AXIAL DISTANCE FROM ROTOR HUB LEADING EDGE 11.011 CENTIMETERS
ENERGY AVERAGED TOTAL PRESSURE RATIO ACROSS ROTOR 1.642
MASS AVERAGED TOTAL TEMPERATURE RATIO ACROSS ROTOR 1.164
ROTOR ADIABATIC EFFICIENCY 0.95
STATIC PRESSURE ON THE SHROUD
1.2589 _ P REF.
STATIC PRESSURE ON THE HUB
1.0025 _ P REF.

RADIUS P TOTAL/ T TOTAL/ P STATIC/ FLOW ANGLE


(CENTIMETERS) P REF. T REF. P REF. (DEGREES)
25.2258 1.6664 1.1905 1.2691 57.0
22.0320 1.6549 1.1664 1.2378 54.9
20.8280 1.6501 1.1612 1.2180 56.0
19.6164 1.6426 1.1575 1.2024 55.7
18.5947 1.6277 1.1556 1.1826 57.8
17.1526 1.6202 1.1529 1.1609 59.6
15.8902 1.6572 1.1556 1.1545 41.4
16.6126 1.6406 1.1585 1.0962 44.5
15.5299 1.6086 1.1535 1.0588 48.1

35
TABLE IV.--GEOMETRIC PARAMETERS USED IN PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS

[Areas used cover only a portion of the span. Approximately 1.5-percent blockage at the hub and 1,26-percent blockage at the tip were assumed to account
for aerodynamic blockage of endwall layers, At station 1 only values of measured conditions from tables lll(a) and Co) corresponding to radii herein should be used.[

DESIGN RADIUS AREA, /XA_ ST_INE SLOPE

STREAMLINE (CM) (SQ. CM) (DEGREES)

STATION i STATION 2 STATION 1 STATION 2 STATION I STATION 2


1 24.2570 23.2258 324.789 241.362 ---0.508 --1.467
2 22.6873 22.0320 216.650 165.832 -0.587 ---0.771
3 21.1988 20.8280 205.222 158.120 --0.288 0.052
4 19.6469 19.6164 193.331 150.038 0.327 0.963
5 18.0645 18.3947 181.811 142.327 1.176 1.936
6 16.4414 17.1526 171.592 134.895 2.225 2.952
7 14.7396 15.8902 161.001 126.813 3.501 3.933
8 12.9591 14.6126 151.339 117.615 4.969 4.865
9 11.0084 13.3299 177.631 138.240 6.932 5.341

36
TABLE V.--COMPARISON OF INTEGRATED FLOW RATES AT STATIONS 1 AND 2 TO THE ORIFICE FLOW

]Mass flow rates for station 1 differ from those given in figs. 13 and 14 because only the 9 positions given in table IV were used to calculate the flow rates
herein whereas all radial positions listed in tables Ill(a) and (b) were used to calculate the flow rates shown in the figures.]

STATION I NEAR PEAK EFFICIENCY I NEAR STALL

I FLOW RATE RATIO 1 FLOW RATE RATIO


I ( kg/sec ) I ( kg/sec )
I r
ORIFICE I 34.57 1.000 I 32.31 1.000
1 I 35.00 1.012 I 32.75 1.014
2 f 35.53 1.028 I 33.20 1.028

37
TABLE VI.--LASER ANEMOMETER MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS

[Axial distance in rotor geometry table (table I) is AP + 2.159 cm.]

20% SPAN, PEAK EFFICIENCY


10% SPAN, PEAK EFFICIENCY

% CHORD AP RP WNBEG
% CHORD AP RP WNBEG
cm cm
cm cm

-i00.00 -4.978 22.728 87.1


-100.49 -4.633 24.234 92.5
-75.54 -3.467 24.220 101.7 -88.76 -4.427 22.717 96.4
-80.00 -3.998 22.693 103.6
-57.99 -2.647 24.209 117.0
-60.00 -3.018 22.640 119.2
-40.43 -1.826 24.195 131.7
-22.88 -1.006 24.178 145.9 -40.00 -2.037 22.621 134.2
-5.33 -0.185 24.162 159.6 -20.00 -1.057 22.664 148.6
3.45 0.225 24.154 166.4 -i0.00 -0.566 22.686 155.7
7.84 0.430 24.149 169.7 -5.00 -0.321 22.697 159.2
-2.50 -0.199 22.702 161.0
i0.00 0.531 24.077 172.8
12.50 0.648 24.060 174.7 0.00 -0.076 22.708 163.0
15.00 0.765 24.044 176.5 2.50 0.046 22.694 164.9
5.00 0.169 22.681 166.8
17.50 0.881 24.027 178.3
20.00 0.998 24.010 180.1 7.50 0.291 22.668 168.7
10.00 0.414 22.654 170.6
22.50 1.115 23.993 181.8
12.50 0.537 22.641 172.5
25.00 1.232 23.976 183.6
15.00 0.659 22.628 174.3
27.50 1.349 23.959 185.3
17.50 0.782 22.614 176.1
30.00 1.466 23.942 187.0
32.50 1.582 23.925 188.7 20.00 0.904 22.601 177.9
22.50 1.027 22.588 179.7
35.00 1.699 23.908 190.3
37.50 1.816 23.891 192.0 25.00 1.149 22.574 181.4
40.00 1.933 23.874 193.6 27.50 1.272 22.561 183.1
42.50 2.050 23.857 195.3 30.00 1.394 22.548 184.8
45.00 2.167 23.840 196.9 32.50 1.517 22.534 186.5
35.00 1.640 22.521 188.2
47.50 2.283 23.823 198.5
50.00 2.400 23.806 200.1 37.50 1.762 22.508 189.8
40.00 1.885 22.494 191.5
52.50 2.517 23.789 201.7
42.50 2.007 22.481 193.1
55.00 2.634 23.772 203.2
57.50 2.751 23.755 204.8 45.00 2.130 22.468 194.7
60.00 2.868 23.738 206.3 47.50 2.252 22.454 196.3
62.50 2.984 23.721 207.8 50.00 2.375 22.441 197.8
65.00 3.101 23.704 209.3 52.50 2.497 22.428 199.4
55.00 2.620 22.414 200.9
67.50 3.218 23.687 210.7
70.00 3.335 23.671 212.0 57.50 2.743 22.401 202.4
75.00 3.569 23.637 214.7 60.00 2.865 22.388 203.8
77.70 3.695 23.618 216.0 62.50 2.988 22.374 205.3
80.00 3.802 23.603 217.1 65.00 3.110 22.361 206.7
70.00 3.355 22.334 209.4
91.22 4.327 23.535 221.7
72.50 3.478 22.321 210.7
100.00 4.737 23.467 225.5
124.68 5.891 23.399 237.9 75.00 3.600 22.308 212.0
149.10 7.032 23.332 249.5 i00.00 4.826 22.174 223.0
121.39 5.875 22.137 233.6
173.51 8.173 23.266 261.4
188.04 8.852 23.226 268.6 141.29 6.850 22.103 243.3
197.92 9.314 23.218 279.6 161.19 7.826 22.068 253.2
222.34 10.455 23.198 286.3 175.37 8.521 22.044 260.4
234.46 11.021 23.197 292.8 182.12 8.852 22.032 263.3
200.99 9.777 22.026 273.7

38
TABLE VI.--Continued.

30% SPAN, PEAK EFFICIENCY 40% SPAN, PEAK EFFICIENCY

% CHORD AP RP WNBEG % CHORD AP RP WNBEG


cm cm cm cm

-i00.00 -6.071 21.202 81.1 -i00.00 -6.629 19.641 97.8


-80.00 -4.940 21.200 99.0 -80.00 -5.431 19.645 117.9
-74.56 -4.633 21.199 100.6 -66.69 -4.633 19.647 129.5
-60.00 -3.810 21.203 115.9 -60.00 -4.232 19.654 136.7
-40.00 -2.680 21.208 132.0 -40.00 -3.033 19.674 154.5
-20.00 -1.549 21.224 147.5 -20.00 -1.834 19.708 171.6
-i0.00 -0.984 21.234 155.2 -i0.00 -1.234 19.733 180.0
-5.00 -0.702 21.239 158.9 -5.00 -0.935 19.746 184.1
-2.50 -0.560 21.242 160.8 -2.50 -0.785 19.752 186.2
0.00 -0.419 21.245 163.0 0.00 -0.635 19.759 188.6
2.50 -0.278 21.235 165.1 2.50 -0.485 19.754 190.9
5.00 -0.137 21.226 167.1 5.00 -0.335 19.750 193.2
7.50 0.005 21.217 169.2 7.50 -0.185 19.746 195.4
i0.00 0.146 21.208 171.2 10.00 -0.036 19.742 197.6
12.50 0.287 21.199 173.1 20.00 0.564 19.725 206.0
15.00 0.429 21.190 175.1 30.00 1.163 19.708 213.9
22.50 0.852 21.163 180.7 40.00 1.763 19.691 221.2
25.00 0.994 21.154 182.5 50.00 2.362 19.674 228.1
30.00 1.276 21.136 186.1 60.00 2.962 19.657 234.3
32.50 1.418 21.126 187.9 70.00 3.561 19.640 240.0
35.00 1.559 21.117 189.6 80.00 4.161 19.623 245.3
40.00 1.841 21.099 193.0 90.00 4.760 19.605 250.1
42.50 1.983 21.090 194.7 i00.00 5.359 19.588 254.0
45.00 2.124 21.081 196.3 117.38 6.401 19.597 263.1
50.00 2.407 21.063 199.5 134.47 7.425 19.605 271.8
50.00 2.407 21.063 199.5 151.55 8.450 19.613 280.7
55.00 2.689 21.045 202.6 158.26 8.852 19.616 284.3
60.00 2.972 21.027 205.6 168.64 9.474 19.629 289.8
65.00 3.254 21.008 208.4 185.81 10.503 19.649 308.3
70.00 3.537 20.990 211.2
80.00 4.102 20.954 216.3
90.00 4.667 20.918 221.1
i00.00 5.232 20.881 225.0
117.07 6.197 20.867 235.2
136.03 7.268 20.851 245.0

39
TABLE VI.--Continued.

50% SPAN, PEAK EFFICIENCY 60% SPAN, PEAK EFFICIENCY

% CHORD AP RP WNBEG % CHORD AP RP WNBEG


cm cm cm cm

-i00.00 -7.341 17.997 91.5 -i00.00 -8.128 16.331 127.7


-80.00 -6.041 18.029 113.2 -80.00 -6.716 16.376 152.6
-60.00 -4.741 18.062 133.1 -60.00 -5.304 16.420 174.3
-58.34 -4.633 18.064 134.6 -50.50 -4.633 16.441 185.6
-40.00 -3.441 18.089 151.8 -40.00 -3.891 16.464 194.7
-20.00 -2.141 18.132 169.7 -20.00 -2.479 16.507 215.2
-10.00 -1.491 18.190 178.3 -I0.00 -1.773 16.593 223.8
-5.00 -1.166 18.219 182.6 -5.00 -1.420 16.640 229.3
-2.50 -1.003 18.233 184.8 -2.50 -1.243 16.664 231.5
0.00 -0.841 18.247 187.3 2.50 -0.890 16.696 236.8
2.50 -0.678 18.249 189.8 5.00 -0.714 16.704 239.3
5.00 -0.516 18.250 192.2 7.50 -0.537 16.711 241.8
7.50 -0.353 18.251 194.5 20.00 0.345 16.751 254.0
i0.00 -0.191 18.252 196.8 30.00 1.052 16.782 262.9
20.00 0.459 18.257 205.5 40.00 1.758 16.814 270.8
50.00 2.409 18.271 227.3 50.00 2.464 16.845 276.9
60.00 3.059 18.276 233.1 60.00 3.170 16.877 283.1
70.00 3.709 18.281 238.4 70.00 3.876 16.908 288.7
80.00 4.359 18.286 243.1 80.00 4.582 16.940 292.6
90.00 5.009 18.291 247.3 90.00 5.288 16.971 297.0
100.00 5.659 18.296 250.8 I00.00 5.994 17.003 300.5
115.14 6.643 18.326 257.6 112.88 6.904 17.050 305.3
130.04 7.612 18.356 264.5 125.76 7.813 17.098 311.2
144.95 8.581 18.386 271.4 138.63 8.722 17.146 317.2
149.12 8.852 18.395 273.4 140.47 8.852 17.153 317.9
159.85 9.549 18.420 278.5 151.51 9.632 17.196 323.3
174.76 10.518 18.456 285.8 164.39 10.541 17.247 329.7
183.35 11.077 18.478 290.1

4O
TABLE Vl.--Continued.

70% SPAN, PEAK EFFICIENCY 80% SPAN, PEAK EFFICIENCY

% CHORD AP RP WNBEG % CHORD AP RP WNBEG


cm cm cm cm

-i00.00 -9.111 14.518 117.0 -100.00 -9.952 12.540 99.6


-80.00 -7.563 14.595 143.9 -80.00 -8.291 12.671 132.7
-60.00 -6.015 14.671 168.1 -60.00 -6.630 12.802 160.7
-42.14 -4.633 14.740 187.7 -40.00 -4.970 12.933 185.8
-40.00 -4.467 14.748 189.8 -35.94 -4.633 12.959 191.3
-20.00 -2.919 14.831 211.4 -20.00 -3.309 13.061 210.5
-10.00 -2.146 14.905 221.8 -I0.00 -2.479 13.125 221.9
-5.00 -1.759 14.979 227.4 -5.00 -2.064 13.224 226.9
-2.50 -1.565 15.015 229.7 -2.50 -1.856 13.283 230.3
0.00 -1.372 15.052 232.4 0.00 -1.648 13.343 233.3
2.50 -1.178 15.068 235.3 2.50 -1.441 13.369 236.5
7.50 -0.791 15.101 241.8 5.00 -1.233 13.396 239.4
i0.00 -0.598 15.118 244.2 7.50 -1.026 13.423 243.3
20.00 0.176 15.184 254.5 10.00 -0.818 13.450 246.0
30.00 0.950 15.249 263.3 20.00 0.012 13.558 258.6
50.00 2.498 15.381 277.4 30.00 0.843 13.665 266.4
60.00 3.272 15.447 283.1 40.00 1.673 13.772 272.5
70.00 4.046 15.513 288.0 50.00 2.503 13.880 277.5
80.00 4.820 15.578 291.2 60.00 3.333 13.987 284.3
90.00 5.594 15.644 294.8 70.00 4.164 14.095 288.1
100.00 6.368 15.710 297.2 80.00 4.994 14.202 291.0
110.95 7.216 15.771 301.3 90.00 5.824 14.310 293.1
121.78 8.053 15.832 305.6 i00.00 6.655 14.417 293.8
132.10 8.852 15.890 309.9 109.56 7.448 14.488 297.3
132.60 8.891 15.893 310.1 119.02 8.234 14.558 300.0
126.46 8.852 14.613 302.5
128.50 9.022 14.629 302.9
137.95 9.806 14.703 306.1
147.42 10.592 14.778 309.5

41
TABLE Vl.--Continued.

10% SPAN, NEAR STALL 20% SPAN, NEAR STALL

% CHORD AP RP WNBEG % CHORD AP RP WNBEG


cm cm cm cm

-I00.00 -4.674 24.235 123.5 -100.00 -5.385 22.729 117.1


-99.14 -4.633 24.234 124.2 -88.76 -4.802 22.728 126.4
-80.00 -3.729 24.223 138.7 -80.00 -4.348 22.712 133.6
-60.00 -2.784 24.211 153.2 -60.00 -3.312 22.656 149.2
-40.00 -1.839 24.192 167.2 -40.00 -2.276 22.611 164.2
-20.00 -0.894 24.169 180.8 -20.00 -1.240 22.659 178.6
-i0.00 -0.422 24.157 187.4 -i0.00 -0.721 22.683 185.7
-5.00 -0.185 24.151 190.8 -i0.00 -0.721 22.683 185.7
-2.50 -0.067 24.148 192.4 -5.00 -0.462 22.696 189.2
0.00 0.051 24.145 194.3 -2.50 -0.333 22.702 191.0
2.50 0.169 24.128 195.2 0.00 -0.203 22.708 193.0
5.00 0.287 24.111 197.1 2.50 -0.074 22.694 194.9
7.50 0.405 24.094 198.9 5.00 0.056 22.681 196.8
i0.00 0.523 24.077 200.7 7.5O 0.185 22.668 198.7
20.00 0.996 24.010 207.9 i0.00 0.315 22.654 200.6
30.00 1.468 23.942 214.7 20.00 0.833 22.601 207.9
40.00 1.941 23.874 221.2 30.00 1.351 22.548 214.8
50.00 2.413 23.806 227.6 40.00 1.869 22.494 221.5
60.00 2.885 23.738 233.7 50.00 2.388 22.441 227.8
70.00 3.358 23.670 239.3 60.00 2.906 22.388 233.8
80.00 3.830 23.603 244.3 70.00 3.424 22.334 239.4
90.00 4.303 23.535 248.8 80.00 3.942 22.281 244.4
i00.00 4.775 23.467 252.5 90.00 4.460 22.228 249.1
123.61 5.891 23.401 263.8 i00.00 4.978 22.174 253.0
121.39 6.087 22.133 263.6
141.29 7.118 22.096 273.3
161.19 8.149 22.058 283.2
175.37 8.884 22.032 290.4
181.09 9.180 22.030 293.3
200.99 10.212 22.023 303.7

42
TABLE Vl.--Continued.

30% SPAN, NEAR STALL 40% SPAN, NEAR STALL

% CHORD AP RP WNBEG % CHORD AP RP WNBEG


cm cm cm cm

-100.00 -5.969 21.202 iii.i -i00.00 -6.452 19.641 52.2


-80.00 -4.856 21.199 128.8 -80.00 -5.263 19.645 71.9
-75.98 -4.633 21.199 131.0 -69.40 -4.633 19.647 83.9
-60.00 -3.744 21.203 145.5 -60.00 -4.074 19.656 90.3
-40.00 -2.631 21.208 161.4 -40.00 -2.885 19.677 107.8
-20.00 -1.519 21.225 176.7 -20.00 -1.697 19.712 124.5
-i0.00 -0.963 21.235 184.3 -i0.00 -1.102 19.735 132.7
-5.00 -0.685 21.240 188.0 -5.00 -0.805 19.747 136.7
-2.50 -0.545 21.242 189.8 -2.50 -0.657 19.753 138.7
0.00 -0.406 21.245 192.0 0.00 -0.508 19.759 141.1
2.50 -0.267 21.235 194.0 2.50 -0.359 19.754 143.3
5.00 -0.128 21.226 196.1 5.00 -0.211 19.750 145.6
7.50 0.011 21.217 198.1 7.50 -0.062 19.746 147.8
i0.00 0.150 21.208 200.1 10.00 0.086 19.742 149.9
20.00 0.706 21.172 207.7 20.00 0.681 19.725 158.1
30.00 1.262 21.136 214.8 30.00 1.275 19.708 165.8
40.00 1.819 21.099 221.7 40.00 1.869 19.691 173.0
50.00 2.375 21.063 228.2 50.00 2.464 19.674 179.6
60.00 2.931 21.027 234.3 60.00 3.058 19.657 185.7
70.00 3.487 20.990 239.9 90.00 4.841 19.605 200.9
80.00 4.044 20.954 245.0 116.25 6.401 19.596 213.3
90.00 4.600 20.918 249.8 133.46 7.424 19.604 221.7
I00.00 5.156 20.881 253.7 150.73 8.451 19.614 230.3
118.71 6.197 20.866 263.9
137.97 7.268 20.851 273.7
157.23 8.340 20.835 283.3
166.44 8.852 20.828 288.0
176.49 9.411 20.831 293.2
195.75 10.483 20.836 302.9
205.89 11.046 20.847 308.5

43
TABLE Vl.--Continued.

50% SPAN, NEAR STALL 60% SPAN, NEAR STALL

% CHORD AP RP WNBEG % CHORD AP RP WNBEG


cm cm cm cm

-100.00 -7.264 17.999 93.9 -i00.00 -8.090 16.332 7.7


-80.00 -5.969 18.031 115.4 -80.00 -6.680 16.377 31.1
-60.00 -4.674 18.063 135.1 -60.00 -5.270 16.421 52.3
-59.37 -4.633 18.064 136.7 -50.95 -4.633 16.441 62.8
-40.00 -3.378 18.090 153.6 -40.00 -3.861 16.465 72.2
-10.00 -1.435 18.192 179.9 -20.00 -2.451 16.508 91.2
-5.00 -i.iii 18.220 184.2 -i0.00 -1.746 16.595 i00.i
-2.50 -0.949 18.233 186.3 -5.00 -1.394 16.641 104.6
0.00 -0.787 18.247 188.8 -2.50 -1.218 16.665 106.9
2.50 -0.625 18.249 191.3 2.50 -0.865 16.696 112.3
5.00 -0.464 18.250 193.6 5.00 -0.689 16.704 114.9
7.50 -0.302 18.251 196.0 7.50 -0.513 16.711 117.5
10.00 -0.140 18.252 198.2 I0.00 -0.337 16.719 119.9
20.00 0.508 18.257 206.8 20.00 0.368 16.751 129.0
30.00 1.156 18.262 214.7 30.00 1.073 16.782 137.2
40.00 1.803 18.267 221.9 40.00 1.778 16.814 144.3
50.00 2.451 18.271 228.3 50.00 2.483 16.845 150.6
60.00 3.099 18.276 234.1 60.00 3.188 16.877 156.1
70.00 3.746 18.281 239.2 70.00 3.893 16.908 160.9
80.00 4.394 18.286 243.9 80.00 4.597 16.940 165.1
90.00 5.042 18.291 248.0 90.00 5.302 16.971 168.8
I00.00 5.690 18.296 251.4 i00.00 6.007 17.003 171.5
114.72 6.643 18.325 258.1 112.72 6.904 17.050 176.6
129.68 7.612 18.356 264.8 125.62 7.813 17.098 181.8
148.82 8.852 18.395 273.5 140.23 8.852 17.153 187.9
159.59 9.549 18.420 278.6 151.30 9.632 17.196 192.6
164.20 10.541 17.247 198.3
172.10 11.097 17.277 201.8

44
TABLE Vl.--Continued.

70% SPAN, NEAR STALL 80% SPAN, NEAR STALL

% CHORD AP RP WNBEG % CHORD AP RP WNBEG


cm cm cm cm

-I00.00 -8.951 14.526 53.6 -100.00 -9.754 12.556 39.7


-80.00 -7.416 14.602 79.0 -80.00 -8.113 12.685 69.9
-60.00 -5.882 14.678 101.3 -60.00 -6.472 12.814 96.1
-43.73 -4.633 14.740 112.8 -40.00 -4.831 12.943 119.4
-40.00 -4.347 14.755 122.2 -37.59 -4.633 12.959 122.6
-20.00 -2.812 14.836 142.2 -20.00 -3.190 13.070 141.3
-10.00 -2.045 14.919 152.1 -10.00 -2.370 13.136 151.8
-5.00 -1.661 14.985 156.6 -5.00 -1.960 13.239 156.8
-2.50 -1.469 15.019 157.0 -2.50 -1.755 13.291 159.3
0.00 -1.278 15.052 159.6 0.00 -1.549 13.343 162.3
2.50 -1.086 15.068 162.2 2.50 -1.344 13.369 165.5
5.00 -0.894 15.085 164.6 5.00 -1.139 13.396 168.5
7.50 -0.702 15.101 167.0 7.50 -0.934 13.423 171.4
10.00 -0.510 15.118 169.3 10.00 -0.729 13.450 174.1
20.00 0.257 15.184 178.8 20.00 0.091 13.558 183.8
33.30 1.278 15.291 190.0 30.00 0.912 13.665 191.7
40.00 1.792 15.315 193.9 40.00 1.732 13.772 197.9
50.00 2.559 15.381 200.6 50.00 2.553 13.880 203.0
60.00 3.326 15.447 206.5 60.00 3.373 13.987 206.9
70.00 4.094 15.513 210.7 80.00 5.014 14.202 211.8
80.00 4.861 15.578 215.3 90.00 5.834 14.310 213.0
90.00 5.628 15.644 219.4 100.00 6.655 14.417 212.8
i00.00 6.396 15.710 221.5 109.67 7.448 14.488 214.4
110.69 7.216 15.770 227.0 119.25 8.234 14.558 216.2
126.78 8.852 14.613 217.8
128.85 9.022 14.629 218.2

45
TABLE Vl.--Concluded.

90% SPAN, NEAR STALL

% CHORD AP RP WNBEG
cm cm

-80.00 -8.700 10.635 92.4


-60.00 -6.985 10.792 126.8
-40.00 -5.270 10.950 155.9
-32.56 -4.633 11.008 168.6
-20.00 -3.556 11.162 183.2
-i0.00 -2.699 11.284 196.1
-5.00 -2.270 11.361 202.9
-2.50 -2.056 11.419 205.7
0.00 -1.841 11.478 209.1
2.50 -1.627 11.519 213.7
5.00 -1.413 11.561 216.9
7.50 -1.199 11.602 220.1
i0.00 -0.984 11.643 223.0
20.00 -0.127 11.807 234.1
30.00 0.730 11.972 242.9
40.00 1.587 12.137 249.6
50.00 2.445 12.301 253.6
60.00 3.302 12.466 257.3
70.00 4.159 12.630 259.5
80.00 5.016 12.795 260.4
90.00 5.874 12.960 260.3
109.93 7.582 13.207 258.9
118.79 8.341 13.280 259.7
124.74 8.852 13.330 259.8
127.64 9.101 13.356 260.9

46
ORIFICE
ATMOSPHERE;
INLET "'_Q_r_

INLET THROTTLEVALVES _-_-'_

STRAIGHTENER
TEST SCREEN 7
I

STAGE -_ [
DRIVE GEAR- /PLENUM-a /
MOTOR -_ BOX-_ I _,l

! L-COLLECTOR/ L__....J; V I/)m°_' EXHAUST


! THROTTLE -I"__PHERE

Figure I.--Schematic diagram of NASA Lewis single-stage compressor test facility.

w 304.1
i
W - RELATIVE VELOCITY /J

U - BLADE VELOCI

U =
394.(I
V - ABSOLUTE VELOCITY // _O.5

V=

W = 445.5_ ROT!TION

C-88-05331

Figure 2.--Test rotor.

V = 182.9 M/SEC

Figure 3.--Velocity diagrams at design conditions at 10-percent span from tip.

ORIGINAL PAGE
47
BLACK AND WHITE PHOTOGRAPN
liP CLEARANCE _ 0,1016 CM

SHROUD CONTOUR

_O_O-O-O-O-C)-O- IURFACE Of REVOLUTION

CONTOUR

l : 9.03 CM

ROTATING HUB

[ -I,374 CM Z : 9.365 CM
Z

\'_//\'FNPC
"_f COORDINAIES IN TABLE ]
MERI[)IONA[ I)IS1ANCE

SURFACE 1 \// AT K = 35 ARE FOR

%- SURFACE 1 // A BLUNT BLADE_\

_ S[fiLI ACT 2

C[ 7 -_-_- 1
/.___.s_ Z _ [FADING CIRCLE

/ .... . j J/" I DG[cI t

1' %' POINT / /L]RAILING

/ / CIRCLE
Z ...... /\

_I_AI_B INTABLE
, SURFACF 2 ±
AI K 1 ARE _OR A

BLUN! BLADE

TRAILING EDGE BLOWUP


LEADING EDGE BLOWUP

(b)

(a) Meridional projection.

(b) Blade-to-blade surface,

Figure 4.--Definition of blade and flowpath geometry nomenclature used in tables I and 11.

48
AERO STATION 1j
/
/" AERO STATION 2 SPAN,
26-- -_ 7 PERCENT

10
22 --
30
• °

18 -- 50

8 • • 70

14 -- " " 90

10 "--- /

j
AP = -q.652 CM _ -2.159 CM L8.852 CM
LA OPTICAL AXIS]
I
o"I I i I I I
-10 -5 0 5 10 15
AP, CM

Figure 5.--Meridional view of test fan rotor showing laser anemometer and
aerodynamic survey locations. CIRCUMFERENTIAL
MEASUREMENT
LINE_,

f/7 ROTAT ION

_-,,O.051-CMX O,O06LI-CMWALL TUES_


CP

/- O.013-CM-DIAMETER 0
,/ THERMOCOUPLE WIRE
/
,/
Figure 7.--Definition of circumferential measurement line.

/ / //
•'::
O.21G-CM i-O.tl76_CM
O. 152 CM DIA/'[TER DIAMETER
(a)

/"_8 h _1 _,_._0.117 CM

"\_"0.476-CM
O.03,-c.-OIA,
/ g3gTER DIAMETER
HOLES
EACH
SIOE
(b)

(a) Cobra probe for total pressure, total temperature, and angle measurements.
(b) Wedge probe for static pressure measurements.

Figure 6.--Aerodynamic survey probes.

49
_ PASSAGE I/ PASSAGE _2/
AP

11213141516
I,
181911011111211311,11s11611,11811912o
""e
WINDOW NUMBER
OPR

Figure 8.--Generation of measurement windows using shaft angle encoder pulses.

AERO
SURVEY
AERO
STATION 1
SURVEY

I
I
STATION 2

STATOR
LOCATION

oo0O
o o o

)-
°ooo °

I I I I I I I I I I I I 101 a

PERCENT PITCH
Figure I1.--Meridional view of measurement surface constructed from
straight-line interpolation between known design streamline coordinates.

II IiIIltl

Figure lO.--Schematic representation of LA blade-to-blade data plot showing


location of zero-data region caused by blade metal blockage.

50
.7

.6

.94 m

NEARPEAl( EFFICIENCY iI
¢; .

o
N
t_j
o oo 0
N .90 --
0 (_-NEAR STALL

o
.86 --
0 .2 .4 .fi .8 1.0
FRACTION OF SPAN FROM HUB TO CASING
0
Figure 13.--Axial velocity distribution at inlet survey station at near peak
efficiency flow rate. Flow rate from orifice, 34.57 kg/sec; critical velocity
.82 I I I I I at standard-day conditions, VSTD, 310.63 m/sec.

1.8 --

/- NEAR STALL
o NEAR PEAK
©
1.7 EFFICIENCY "7
/
Oo i
/
O

1.6 o
u')

0-
o

1.5 m o

1.rIB
o ,_._ KG/$EC

" ' I, A MEASURED 32.15


II
.2 _ o LASER MEASUREMENTS, MEAN
1.3 I I I I I
.90 .92 .94 .% .98 1.00 _ .1 _ T RANGE OF LASER MEASUREMENTS
MASS FLOW RATE/MASS FLOW RATE AT CHOKE
(CHOKE FLOW RATE = 34.96 KG/SEC) I I
0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1.0
Figure 12.--Fan rotor design speed operating characteristic. FRACTION OF SPAN FROM HUB TO CASING

Figure 14.--Axial velocity distribution at inlet survey station at near stall flow
rate. Flow rate from orifice, 32.31 kg/sec; critical velocity at standard-
day conditions, VSTD, 310.63 m/sec.

51
120-PERCENT
CHORD
I
I

80 7p_TRcCHE
NT

BEG + 50

/ f / 50-PERCENT

/// ,CH -10 PERCENT// I


CHORD // I
/// /.._// -30 PERCENt i _" I
CHORD I//- I
//// /// 20-PERCENT

V /" /// _./i..._PITCH


I i
I 1
/ / i---
/ / /
,// // ///
//
J/ J H'/ I
I
I
t

// ////

II iII_
/ jr WNBEG
/
Figure 16. -Schematic representation of constant chord lines used to ph)t
Figure 15.--Schematic representation of constant pitch lines used to plot LA
LA data in blade-to-blade direction upstream and downstream of rotor.
data in streamwise direction through rotor.

52
0.90 0'8//

1,,_ 1.li

351.3 11 ' i 9°59_

/
FLOW FLOW

(a) NEAR PEAK EFFICIENCY FLOW NEAR STALL FLOW

-1.15

1.3
_1.2 1.4 \

_._'7_ ,._\ \/ l
FLOW FLOW

(b) NEAR PEAK EFFICIENCY FLOW NEAR STALL FLOW

0.6 y

O. 55

0 1,15_ ,Jr _/

.5
1.1

FLOW ROTATION
/
FLOW ROTATION

(c) NEAR PEAK EFFICIENCY FLOW NEAR STALL FLOW

(a) ]O-Percent span from shroud.

(b) 30-Percent span from shroud.

(c) 70-Percent span from shroud.

Figure 17.--Contour plots of relative Mach numbers at flows near peak efficiency and near stall.

53
RELA1]VE MACH NUMBER RELATIUE FLON kNGLE

l.q" 66.5
1
1 • I
i zlz ;

1.3 63,5
'X
1.2 1] 60.5

1ol 57°5
t

1°0 Eq.5
II
I
z Iz Iz 'j[ i I I I 1I II l_
0.9 51.5

1
D
|°0¢ -- z_ 66.5
z I

63.5
",l,r
1.3 -x I
z I X
1.2

1.!
--

--
t
1

l
20oX
PITCH
60.5

57.5
\
I x
1,0 -- 5q.E
i z lz I
z
Z Ix
I z

I I I l I I I I II
0.9 51.5

z
z 66.5 D
z
z_z l
z

Z
z 63.5
1 .3 --I
z Z
IN
60.5
30. X 1
l
P] %'CH
l I
I.I -- 57.5

Iz
l
l i _ x
l.O -- z I 5'4".5
l ZX 1
Zzl z z z z
l
1 1 I I 1 I s]._ 1 I I I 1 I
0,9
-50 25 lO0 lF5 250 25 -50 25 lOO 175 250
25
x CHORD x CHORD

Figure 18.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle for lO-percent span and near peak efficiency. Broken lines denote location of
blade leading and trailing edges.

54
RELAT]V( MACH MUHBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE

]._ 66.5 =
I
1.3 _Z
63.5 -- o

J
N
z
1.2 60.5 --
z erO. X
P]ICH Z
z
l.! 57.5 -- I z
z l
z Z Z£ z
z z Z
1.0 z z 54.5 -- ZZ Z
zzl_ z z Jl
Z

0.9 I I I I I I J
51,5

].q- 66,5 --

1.3 63.6 -- 4=

Z
.X
_ 1"
].2 60.5 --
60. X
PITCH
I.] 57.5 -- Z
Z

Z
• z
z_• =f = z
Z
!.0 64.6 -- zlr z
'Z l z
I
0.9 t I I I
51.5
t

|.4 -- 66.5 m

Z • z

1.3 -- 63.6
Z
%
Z

].2 -- 60.5
60. X
Z
P]TCH
].] - Z 57.5 z

• ;1:
• x
_:x z
].0 -- 54.5
• : z • 1K
l • x
I z

0.9 I I I I I 5] o5 I I I I I
-]25 -50 25 ]00 175 250 25 -50 25 ]OO 175 25O
X CHORD X CHORD

Figure 18.--Continued.

55
RELAI|VE NACH NUMBER REL&1IVE FLON &NGLE

le'_ -- 66,5
z z_
;1[
\
%
63.5 .I
1.3 -- I •
l

1.2 -- Z 60.5 --
70, X
Z
PITCH z[

l.I - 57.5 --
X
Z
z
z
z z z z I l
1.0 -- 5_-.5 -- II
z !
z I I
z
I 1 I I I I
0.9 51,5

l.q- -- 66.5

Z z ,x, I I

m
"'_,r I
1.3 -- t 63.5
! I
z
m
I
1.2 -- z 60.5 =.
I

1.1 -- 57.5 --
z
z z I
z z z
5q',5 --
I I
1.0 - z z I
z
"- _ • z I I

I I I I J 1 ,I I 1
0.9 51 .5

leq" -- 66,5

z I I I
z
I 63.5 "H I
1.3 --
t
I I, I
I• I
].2 --
I _o,5
z l 90. X z
I P]ICH

z I 57.5 I ,_- t
1.1 --
I I z I z
I I I
1.0 -- IzI
_:_j, -_I I ' zz zz 5'_.5 I I I
x

1 I " l [ I 51.5 1 I I [ J
0o9
25 100 175 250 25 -50 25 lO0 175 250
25 -50

X CHORD % CHORD

Figure 18.--Concluded.

56
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELA1]VE FLOW ANGLE

69
zZzZIIIZ/IZzZZ]
illZI lz7 I.
III 4Ili - .lllI lI
__ ilIIizIllZZ" b7 _ iIII IIIzIzIIIIizi
1.3 iiI ]z
IIIiizI izI
ztxzzzxzzzzzzXZXZ
1.2 b5
-]00 X

AXIAL

1.! CHORD b3

1,0 bl

I I I I I 59
I I I I I
0.9

|.d I. m b?

IZli I zl|iiizIIIxZlzIzzIIZIIIIIIII
1.3 67
IziIIiiliIIIIII -- iiIZlIIZIZzzzIIIiiI

._..i
xII IIIIIzZI xz x x.xx.Z/I z IZIIZZzI
!.2 b5
-76, X
AXIAL
1.1 CHORD 63

1.0 61

I I I I I 59
[ I I I J
0.9

].q. -- 69 -

izzzzxzzxzzIZzxZIzz/zXxIxzIi

II izl Ix b7
I. 3 -- Ii IzI
IIiziII II
-- ZI | II IIZl'IZzzzIIIzzl!

1.2 65
"l I11 II ii z Ilii Z Iz i I zII IlzlI II
-58. X

AXIAL

l.] CHORD 63

1,0 61

o. 9 I I I I I s9 I 1 I I I
o 20 qo 60 so SOD o 20 ,+o 6o so nOD
x PI'VCH X PITCH

Figure 19.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 10-percent span and near peak efficiency.

57
REL^T]VE NACH NUHBER gELATIVE FLON ANGLE

b9 --
ZlZZ ZZZ;[zzZZZZzIzZZIzZZZZZZZzZz

I z z[
b7 -- Zzz_r'3ZZzE
| . 3 -- ]ZZlZzZzzzzzlZ
Z aZ X

{ I= z

j[l z T..I
1.2 b5 lZI]r_j[ZZII[_[IzZZZZr_I[=ZIZZEZI
-_'0. X
AXIAL

1.1 CHORD 63

I°0 61

0.? I I 1 I I 59 1 J I I J

leq" -- 69 --
Z zZz zZZ:I Z Z:][ZZ zZzZz ZZ][z.zZZ][Zr

1.3 _ zZzzzz¢zzzzzzzzZZZ"'= 67
-- zzZZZZ_zz.z
[ zzz
zz l
1.2 b5 -.._z z z z= zz z z:z zz z r.z zz z r.z z z z z'z Z IZZz
-23. ,%
AXIAL
I.I CHORD 63

1,0 6]

0,9 I 1 I I I 5q
I I I I I

l.=l b? --
ZIrZZZZ Z][zzZZ:ZzzZzzzZZrzzZ:ZZZI:zZZzIZzT-Z][

][ zz
1.3 Z 67 _ iZZZz
llZZ zl Z
|
z z
Zz
!.2 65
-fi._" X "_[z I z|_ZzzzZr.zZZz_Zzz_:zzzzzzZz_Z

AXIAL

1.! CHORO 63

1.0 61

0.9 I I I I J 5(/ I I t J I
0 20 =tO 60 80 I00 0 20 q'O 60 80 I O0
X PITCH X PITCH

Figure 19.--Continued.

58
RELATIVE MACH NUHBER _ELAT]VE FLON ANGLE

1.S 69 --

l.q" 67
tZ zzZZZzzZz_zZZZZZxZZZzZ3zzZzZZzZZZZZZZ'ZzZZZ

ZX Z
1.3
I 65
3.5X ]J'Z Zz Zxz Zz zzz zz x]r Zzz zz z z z zz z xzzz z zZ z:_ z x.z z:z z zzz T
AXIAL

+3
f
.2 !
CHORD

.! 61

.0 I I I I J I I I I I
59

69 --

67

.3 -- zZzzZxzzzzzzzzzZZ_zZzzzzZZzZxZZZz_zxx_ZZZziI
65
7.9 X
AX]AL
.2 - CHORD 63

.| -- 61

.0 I I I 1 1 59 I I I I J

• 5 - 69

.IF 67

.3 66
]O. X
=z_I
AXIAL
.2 CHORD 63

zzZ I
.I 61

• 0 I I I I .l s9 I I I I _J
0 20 ,tO 60 80 IO0 20 '_0 60 80 I00
X PITCH ,lr P]TCH

Figure 19.--Continued.

59
RELAIIVE NACH NUMBER RELAI]UE FLON ANGLE

.5 6'g

.fl m 67

z: Z 11 z_z Z :x z.Z :zz :z z z z zJ z z z :z Z z: :: z z_ZZZz z

b5
.3 -- z
13. X
ZZZZ T

AXIAL Zzzzxzxzzz_xZzxzzzzz_zzZzzzZzZ[zzzzZzZ

z
CHORD 63
.2
lzzl

61
ol

I I I I .I I I I I 1
59
°0

.5 b3 I

:[z : zz zzz z ][zZ: zZZZz zzZz_[zZzZzzZzZZ z_[z z z

6] Z

h
__ Z.[ Z ZZ ZZ Z Z_I:Z Z Z ZZ Z_[ Z Z'Z ZZ I ZZ Z Z Z ZZ Z_[ i Z-Z Z Z
59 _ z=zi!
.3
15. X
][

AXIAL
zZZzzz I CHORD
.2

1.]

I I I I 1 I I I I _1
53
1.0

63 1 =" mmu "" • ......


• • • m=lZ z==•z m_lm=z:•mtzmmz 1

b_ - "'=%=']/
Z_szszz=_ z-zzzzszzZzZz ZZZz:zrZZZzz z

59
!
1.3 m

]8, X
AX ] AL
=='=====z]I CHORD 57
1.2

I°] 55

I I -J 53 I I I I .I
l.O
_0 60 80 ] O0 0 20 q-O 60 80 ! O0
0 EO
X PIICH
X PIICH

Figure 19.--Continued.

60
RELATIVE NACH MUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE

].5--
63 -- z=zz
=====-•=====x=z =_= zxzz=zz z-_u •
z

b] -- z

==ZZzzz] [1
zz== •z == • =zzzZ==Zz • _ • zZx zz== zz zz z
1.3 z
59
z 20. X
Zzz z AXIAL
.2 Zzlz CHORD 57

.! 55

.0 I I I I I I I I I I
53

•5 -- 63 n

.=1 61 -- zz
zz z
ZZZ8 zzz_zzZZZz z_ ZZzzZzzz z_zz zZ_z
.3 _ =z_zI
59
=zz 23. X

AXIAL
:[zzz
.2 z
CHORD 57
zzzz]

56 -

I i I I I I I I I
53

.5 -- 63 --

m Z
6] ZzzzzlrczzzzZzzZz_zzz2zZzzz ¢=ZZz r

Zx
Zz= zzZ ZzzzZ z_[ZZZZ_zz:z zzz z.z zZZZz
1.3 59 TTZZzn, z]lr T] i
26. X
zz
AX]AL
z_ z
1.2 -- Zz CHORO 57
zz
Z_rzI

].! 55

1.0 I I I I I 5a I I I I I
20 q'O 60 8O 100 0 20 fl-0 60 80 I00
X P]TCH •11; P]TCH

Figure 19.--Continued.

6]
I:_ELAI]VE FLOH ANGLE
RELATIVE HACH NUMBER

• 5 --
63
l/=xxzxzzzZzJZxZZzZXZXzzzz:rJ z

.or m b]
z

Z zzZZZ 7"_ z xZz_zzz Zz rzz zzZ zzZzz


Zzzz z .It
x 5':/
.3 -- ZZZZ]TZz I
28. ,I[
I

ZX AXIAL

zz
CHORO 57
.? zz

ZZzzzz;]

.I -- 55

I I I 1 I 53
I I I I J
°o

.5 - 63

]£zzZZZZzZZX'ZZZZZzZZZzZzZ:ZZ z

.'F d 6]

][zzzzZ zzzZZzzzzzzzZZZzzzzZ z
z
' Z

ZZ It
59
.3 z 30. X -- Xzx.zz:zzzzlzIT
AXIAL
lrz: r

.? CHORD 57

.] -- B6

I I I I I I I I I .]
.0 53

•5 - 63

7 zzz zzzZ z ZZZzzT_ZIZ Z_][ZZEZ

l.q- 6] __ Z

Z
Z
Z z:zx zzzZzzzz_[ z zz zZ zzZZzz rl

1.3 59
33. X - ZZzzzzzzzZZZZZ]t
z AXIAL
z
CHORO 57
1.2 __ zz

zz

EZZzz Z
!*]
55
ZZzz

I I I I J 53 I I I I ._1
I.O 0 20 q-O 60 80 IO0
0 20 _o 60 go 100
x PIICH X PITCH

Figure 19.--Continued.

62
RELAI]U£ MACH NUMBER RELATIUE FLON ANGLE

.5 63 --

_3 ] "--]XxzxzLZIx_zZ_ZzzzzzzzzZZzz

i]!
_zzZzzzZZZ=ZXz_zZ=zXZZzz

_ I
.3 59 -
z 36. X

Z AXIAL
Z ZIIZIZIzzIIlIIlII
.2 -- Z CHORO 57 -
Zz

Zz

.] E5 -
-- ZZZZz l

Z'= Zzx I i I!
.0
I I i I s3 I ]

.5 -- 63

1.2
.4

.3
-_;[ z :[zZ z_ Z:[z zz z z_[ x_ z zz Zz

z"
Z
z
Z
Z
38.
AXIAL
CHORO
X
61

5'9

57
_
._ Z Z Z ][Z WZ Z Z:][Z:I[ Z Z'J[ZZ Z ZZ ZZ 1'

-
Z
Z

Zzz zlZ II
I1
Z
z
Z

I.I 66
ZZTZZz z

Zzzzz i

1.0 I I I I .I 53 I I +J

|.5 -- 63 --

4 T zZZZ:Z_'Z ZZ:ZT]r Z zZ][Z ZZ z


1.I- 6]
Z
ZZ][EzZzZ ZzZ zzZZZzxz z
Z Z

' ]
Z

!.3 Z 59
_0. X
Z -- lli zzZZ!
Z AX]AL
Z
1.2 Z CHORO 57 IIIIHIIIIII
Z

Z
Z

l.I 55
Z_Zzz_x_==z

1.0 I I I I ..l 53 I I I 1 ..1


0 20 _0 60 BO ]00 0 20 _0 60 80 O0

X P]TCH X PITCH

Figure 19.--Continued.

63
RELAIIV[ MACH NUHBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE

]._ 7zzzzZnZZzZZIzzzl 63 --
I
I

1.3 -- t 61
I izzuzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
I I
I i
1.2 -- I 59
l q'3, X ]
I AXIAL
z
1.I -- x CHORO 5?

1.0 __ zzzzZzZZzzZz 55

0.9
I l I I i J 53

63 --

TIlzrzzzzzzzZZ£z z

1.3 _ z 61
I
l
I
I
i.2 1 59
Z
q'5, X
Z
AXIAL
Z
].i Z CHORO 57
z I

Zzz_zzzu=_u '

1,0 66

0.9 I I I I --i 53

).q" "-===zzzzzzzzzz (>3 --


zz
l
I
z
1,3 -- z 61 -
I zzZZZzzzzz'z_zzi
Z
I
Z
1,2 -- z 59 -
z
_8. X
Ix
z AXIAL It [
z CHORO
1.] z 57 -
z
ZIiz zz::=="
1.0 55 --

o.9 I I I I J 53 I I 1 1 I
0 20 =fO 60 80 100 0 20 q-O 60 80 00

X P]]CH X PITCH

Figure 19.--Continued.

64
RELATIU[ FLON ANGLE
R_I.&III#[ MACH HUHBEI_

6O
_z_m_mJmnl
zI -]zzzIIzzlz]z"[,l
I I ,z]
1.3 - LI 58
Z
Z
z
56
_- ':il
],::n:.,,,..z*'*
1.2 1 60. X
Z
AXIAL
Z
1.1 z CHORD 5'1-

z_z

1.0 z _Zz:z zEmmisss_z I 52

! I I I I I l l I ._.I
0.9 5O

6O
1., -_IIIllllIIIl]
I
I
Z
1.3-- 58
I _ zz
I
I

1.2 -- z 56
53° X
!
AXIAL
1
1ol -- z CHORD 5't-
]r
z

XZZzzzzzmzlzs_l_
1.0
62

I I I ._! I I I I 11
I
0.9 I 5O

6O
loq" "]m_i_ll

r
I 68
1.3-
Z
g

I
1.2 - 56
Z 65. X

I AXIAL
l
l.I -- CHORO Sq"
Z

1.0-- 52

I I I .__1 50
I I 1 I ._.J
0.9 i
0 ;m 'tO 60 80 100 20 q'O 60 80 tO0

X PIICH X PITCH

Figure 19.--Continued.

65
RELATIVE MACH _UMBER REL^IIVE FLOW ANGLE

! q..jdzxi 60 --
• Iii
I IIZZIIIliI
I
1.3 -- 58 - II
I
I zI
I
x
I l l
1.2 -- 56
I 58. X Ii I zI
I IIIItiiiTz z
AXIAL

l°l -- I CHORD
II
I1

1°0 -- ]r ][I IZll: zzZZZ 8. zZ-'mCz I 62

0.9 I t 1 I 5O I I I I ,._.J

I • '_ "Iz'zr_ I 60 --
I
I IzZzZzIIIi .n
1.3 --
I
I 6e - II 1 z'""
t
I
1.2 --
I 60. X 56 - I_i 'r/z
I AXIAL IIIiiiIlzzzZ
I.! -- I CHORD 5_ --
I
I

1.0 -- IlIIIzzzlz: s_zzzzl_xrJstJJ: 62 --

0.9 J I 1 I ...J
50 I I I I _._J

l,q- 6O
IIIIi
I
I zZzIZZlIi" z_z'
1.3 -- I 68
- II zz
I

I
11 i x
-"
1.2 56
-- I
63. X
- IT z
I
AXIAL
I tIiiziiiizzr_Zr_z
I.I CHORD 5_

1.0 52

0,9 I I I I .--J 50 I I I 1 ...J


0 20 _0 60 80 I00 0 2O _0 60 80 i00
X PIICH X PIICH

Figure 19.--Continued.

66
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE

! ._ -Izz 60
I
I

1.3 - I 5B zzZItlIil /,
I Eiii

I II ,'
z_rtz
1,2 -- I 56 __ I1 .
66, X
I III z_
I AXIAL llllllIlZ
l.l -- I CHORD

IIZ_IZIIzzz _*_B z ]
].0 -

""n'""" ]1

0.9 I I I I / I 50 I I I I ._I

1,4 bO --
I 888st1[

I
IzitZzi ,,
1.3 68
I
- IIII ,z'"
I
I II zzzz
1.2 -- Z 56
1 68. X - llllliiZizzZ
II AXIAL
I
I.! CHORD 5_
Illllzz z

1.0 52

0.9 I I __1 5O I I I I ...I

1.3

I.E 5&
?0. X
AXIAL
I.! CHORO 5_
Illz lille II Ill ix ZXZZtts n ,,..,......,,N,..,..

1.0 52

0.9 I I I 1 ---J 50 I I 1 I ...J


20 q'O 60 80 lO0 o EO 'q-o 60 80 I00
X PlTCH X PIICH

Figure 19.--Continued.

67
_ELAT]VE MACH NUMBER RELAT]VE FLOH ANGLE

1.3 --

1.2 --
I I 75 X

I AK]AL
I CHORD
I.l --
Z1zz z

1.0 -- ZZzzzzzzZz um=-- l 62 --

ZIZZzIzzZzl[ZZX_ gWZZJ

l I i I 50 --
I 1 1 1
O._ --

|,_- -- 6O

1.3 -- 68
-- zZZZ:Zz

1.2 -- 56
78. X tt I zzZ"z U
_I AXIAL
I iI iiiit IIIlzI;zzz
1.1 -- Z CHORD

ZZz IIiiziiiiIll

ZZ_z==
1.0 --

ZZZ ZzZzzZZZzlZZem •
j il_[z'zzzzzi ..
5O
I I I I
0,9

|._. m 60

1.3 -- 68 -

5& --
80, X

I_ - Ii AXIAL Iz iiillI IIllzIzzzzzzz''''zII]


CHORO 5q- -
1.1 _-* Iz
I zzzzzzzliilIIII
][z

10 Zzx.z 52 --
z]
IZII z -- zzZZz =d=em

I I I t
0.?
0 20 _'0 60 80 DO 0 20 _0 60 80 O0

X PITCH X PITCH

Figure 19.--Continued,

68
RELAT]VE MACH NUMBER RELAIIVE FLOW ANGLE

l.I 60

].0 58
Z] l Z] Zl Z ill1 Z ][IZI][ EIZI zzll It ][I

Izlzl z= • ===_=z

_ IiiiIIIIzIzIlzzIIzzzz=zzI
0.9 56
z
9]. J_
illIIII
AX]AL
0,8 CHORD 5q iIII

[]IIiIIII
0.7 62

0.6 I I I 50
I I I l
O 20 '+0 60 80 lO0 0 20 _0 60 80 00
x PITCH X P|ICH

Figure 19.--Continued.

69
RELAT]VE MACH NUMBER RELAIlVE FLOW ANGLE

].2 57.5 --

1.1 55.5 -- tI IItIIlIzI_zzIzHzzzzI]zz]zzzzII]

1.0 53,5
IO0 X

Z1ZZzzzzzZZIZzzz_zZ_zzZZZZ:t zZ_ZzZZzz_zZzZzz z ^X]hL S ÷S


0.9 z I CHORD 51.5

0.8 q9,6

O.1 I I 1 I I '_7.s I I I I I

],2 57,5
IiIIIlllIIIIl. _I
illlllll
qIIIIi_ TIIII
1.] 6S.6
iii It
I
l.O 53.5

0,9
"_z=zzZZ=ZZzzZZzzzzz

l
z

i
tiZZzZzz_zzZ_=""" 12_ X
AXIAL
CHORD 51.5
1/
Z

0.8 l _9.5

t
I I I I I ,_7,s I I [ I I I
O.1

I.E 57.5 --

].l 66.6

1.0 4 53,5
] ,'
]_9 X
AXIAL
- II:::
0.9 ., ...... =,_==zz=zz]zzz;iiil_Z,..,z,zz==,, .. ....... CHORD 51 .B

0.8 _9.5 --

0.7 I I I I I _7.s I I I I I
5O 70 90 ] I 0 I 30 ]50 50. lO. 90. ]I0. I30. ]50.

X PITCH X PllCH

Figure 19.--Continued.

7O
RELAT]VE NACH MUNBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE

m
]*2 m 57.5

I.! 55,5

IIII_IIILIIIIII]]I I]]]] , I IIIIIIII_BI

1.0 53,5
I73Z m II]II::ZlZ
zzZz z:ZZZ Z xZ Z'Z zZT UZZZ i" AX I _4L
-- I I ]II zz:zzzzzzxzzzzzzzzs_zz
0.9 CHORD 5 ] • 5

0.8 _9.5

I J I I J _7.5
I I I I I
0.7

1.2 -- 57.5

l.] n 65.5

53.5
IIII 1
z",zzz,ZZZZzzz:zz]Z
1.0 ...xxZxzzzZXzXx"zZZZzZl z
]88 X

IIii iiilzz zzxzz'l'zzzxzzzzzzz


AXIAL I I]tlIp:zzz"
0.9 CHORD 61.5

0.8 q-9.5

I I I I I '_7.5
I I I I I
0.?

]*2 57.5

].! 55.6
- Ill i
1.0
Z z_ Z zz zXZ XZ Z'I Z [Z ].Z Z z 53.5 _'"m'mm'mzll II ,iiiiiZIZZZ ZI
-- Z, zzzzzzzzzuzzxzz ]97 X
ZZxz AXIAL
t]iiinzz
_ III/IZZ CHORD 51,6
0.9

0.8 _9.5 --

I I ! I J _7.5 I I I I I
0.7
60 70 90 I lO 130 150 50. 70. 90. |lO. 130, ]50,

3' PITCH X PITCH

Figurel9.--Continued.

71
RELAT]VE NACH NUHBER RELAT]VE FLON ANGLE

57,5

I.] 55,5

1,0 ._zzZxZ_ZxZZZZZZZzzz| zZ_.zzzZZZZZZZZZ 53.5


222 ,1[
AXIAL
ZIIzlIlZZZZZZZZ
0.9 CHORD 5] .5

0.8 q'9.5

0.7
I I I I I _7.5
I I I I I

]q, 2 _ 57.5

1.1 m 65.6

1,0 53.5
_xnzZzzzZZzzzzlrzzz] xxzzzZzZXZ xzzzzxxz 231F X
AXIAL
ZZzZzzz_'"
0.9 CHORD 51 .S

0,8 'F9.5 --

0.7 I I I I _7.s I I I I J
50 7O 90 ]]0 ]30 150 50. 70. 90. llO. )30. |50.

X P]TCH X PITCH

Figure 19.--Concluded.

72
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER gEL^lIVE FLOW ANGLE

I .50 -- 68
• ,4

I .35 -- 6'1- = • _,Ek

Z
Z
\
I .20 -
4 6O
10.0 X
I x
PIICH
I 56
I .05 -- -- Z

I I II

J t Z Z
52
I
0°90 -- I I

I I I z

J I J I _F8
I I I I
0.75

I .50 - 68
• • =1

I .35 -- 6_
Z
-- it _

I .20 --
• Z
60 - \
Z
20, X
P]1CH

I .05 -- 5/'
Z
I

• • Z Z
0.90 -- 62

J I I I I I I
0.75 q'8

I .50 -- 68 m

I
Z

I • &q-
I .36 --

\
Z %
1.20 -- 60 - %
Z 30. X
Z

PITCH
z

I .05 -- 56
z
• • Z
l I
B • •

I 52
0.90 --
I
I II II I I '1"8
I 1 I I ,J
0.75
I_0 200 O0 -_0 20 80 I_0 200
O0 -_0 20 BO
X CHORD x CHORD

Figure 20.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number flow angle at 20-percent span and near peak efficiency. Broken lines denote location of blade
leading and trailing edges.

73
RELAT]VE NACH NUMBER RELATIUE FLON ANGLE

I .50 68 --
s •

I .35 n
6_ -- s

z z z •

Z
\
1.20 60 -- %
$0. X
Z
PITCH
1.05 m
56 -- Z
%

0.90 52 -

0.75 I I i J l
_8

1.50 68 --
I
] .35 m
64 --

i[ z
,%
1.20 z
60 --
50. X
z
PITCH
I .05 m 56 --
i

Z Z

0.90 52 --

0°75 I I I I I I

l .50 b8 --
I

] .35 b4" --
,it

I .20 I
% 60. X
bO --

Pl TCH
I :
I .05 56 --
%
0.90 52 -- I I
I I
0.75
I I 1 I I I I I I I I I
00 -q'o 20 80 190 BOO - O0 -_0 20 80 lq.o 200
X CHORD X CHORO

Figure 20.--Conunued.

74
RELATIVE H^CH NUHBE9 RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE

I .50 68 --
• I

1 .35 z 6dF --

1.20 m
6O
_z 70. X
• PITCH

! .05
• 56

0.90 I 52

I
0.75 I I I I I 1 I qe I I I I

1 .50 -- 68 --
I

1 .36 -- 6'1" --
• I
Z • ,m
@

Z
qb

1.20 -- 60 -
80. X
Z I,.
PIICH ,%
1.05 -- 56 - • %.:
¢
i

0.90 -- 52 -

0.75 I I I I q8 1 I I I I

1.50 -- 68 --
I I

! .3E --
I •.J
6or
Z z • .?,
llla,
I .20 -- 6O m

90. X
PITCH

1.05 -- I " 56 m

I Z

0.90 -- 52
I

0.75 I II I[ I I '_e I I I I I 1 I
O0 -_0 20 80 ! _0 200 -I00 -q.O 20 80 1 _0 2O0

X CHORD X CHORD

Figure 20.--Concluded.

75
RELAIIUE HACH NUMBER flELAIIV[ FLON ANGLE

r
i
1 .q'O 69

I .35 b7

zzzZXZZZZXZxzXXzzXzzzzzzzzzx-ZZZzzzZzzzzzxzZzzzzzZ
I .30 iiiliIIIIIIIIlIIIIIIii b5
-80. X
-IIt t III
AXIAL

I .25 __ IIIiiiliiiiiiIIIIIII CHORD 63

1.20 bl

,I I I I I 59
I I I I I
1.15

1 .qO b9

I .36 b?
,,iIIIIllllllIIIIii.

1.30 65 ZZZ Z"TZZ Z ZZEz ZZzzz][ ZZ ZZZ Z_[Z_[Z ZZZzz ZZzz 1Z zxZ ZZz X
_ illll
IIII111 il -$0. X
Z

AXIAL
CHORD b3
I .25
--lllIlillliillllll

1.20 bl

I I I I I 59
I I I ! I
1.15

1 ._0 b? -

1.35 b? i

lllllllllIIIIlllIllll]
zZZ'-'z%z z
] zI Z Zz
I .30 b5
- I ,iiillll
I -20. X -- Z ZXZzz:ZZZZZ:Z

AXIAL 1CZ_ZZZ Z2ZzZZzzZz zzZZZ


_ IP CHORD
I .25 tIiiiiiiiII 63

! .20 61

I I I I I s_ I I I I I
1.15
o 2o _o 60 eo 1oo z 22 _z 62 e2 102

X PITCH X PITCH

Figure 21.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 20-percent span and near peak efficiency.

76
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELAT]VE FLOW ANGLE

.'_-0 69 --

.35 67 --
IIZZzzz
:llIllllI I IiiilllnltlIIl
,,3O 65 --
-- t .,111111111131 - I o. x Z
I ZZXZrZZixxZZXXXXzXXzZXX:XzZxxzX. x
z-zzZZzZZZ
I111111111" A X I ^L
.25 -- CHORD 63 --

.2O 6] --

.15 I I I I I I I I I

.uro 69 --

.36 67 -- Z
Ix
llI I lliiIiiiIIIi III
I z
1,30 65 -- I I

- I iii]l_lllllll llIllIIIl -6. z x


Z
IIIIzzIIIIIIZIZIZZIIzIIZZIIIzi z_Zz
AXIAL czz

.25 - ]I] tIIIII c H 0 RO


63 --

.2o 61 --

.15 I 1 I I I 59
I I I I I

69 --

i
.35 67

I z
iIiiiIIIIIIIIIIIIII

.3O - ] 65 ZIzz

O.OX zxz z I
IIIIIITIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII AXIAL
XxZzzXzZZzZZZzlzZZzZZlz]Zzzzzxxzlzzzz I
.25 -- IiI CHORD 63
I
I
.20 61

.]5 I I I I I 59 I I I I I
0 2O _ro 6O 80 i00 2 22 q-2 62 82 102

X P]ICH X PIICH

Figure 2 l.--Continued.

77
REL&TIVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE

l .00 I 56 --

IIIIIIIIiIIiIiiIriiI
I
i]l]lllllllI
lllllI:I .._;TIIIIIIIIIIII.
0.95 I 5'_
-_iiiIii='" i
Z

0.90 52
I00 x
^KIAL

0.85 CHORD 5O ]illllllli


lllllIII::]

0.80 N8

I I I 46
1 l I I I
0.75

] .00 -- 58

zzZzzzZ2ZzZZzzz

0.95 zz z 66
-- zz z ZTZ zZZlzl_[zzz

• 1 IiZI

0.90 5'_ iziZrzzzZZZZzzzzz


12] X
I AXIAL I
0.85 CHORD 52

1
]I::
0.80

l l
iiI l l
BO

I I I I I
0.75 _8

] .00 -- 58

zzZZZ_ZZz
m
0.96 66
_ZZzzz==Z=_zz=ZzzzZlz zzZZ z
z===,_..,,===,,_,=z=,.zIII"
t II L [ .III2.ZZZIIZIII

0.90 5q" - _ II"


- t iI l_I X

:t kXIkL

0.85 CHORD 52 _ ill:


- t]]
i
0.80 50

I I I 1 I _8
I l l l I
0.75
5O 70 90 II0 130 150 50 tO 90 IlO 130 150

% PITCH X P]TCH

Figure 2 l.--Continued.

78
RELATIVE HACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE

! .OO 58 --

0.9,5 m
_ZZZ_I_ZZIIzzZZZZz Z _I[z_z_Zzz 56

==z_rzzzzz;,=='Z-zzzIIII|.,. .,r, ZZZ=zzz,zz


0.90 - Z ] 54
- 'lJillZ_"
Zlli]
I 161x
AXIAL
0,85 -- CHOR0 52 1

B
0.80 60

0.75 I I I I I I I I I I
'1"8

1.075 58 --

IIIZIZIIlIIIIzIIIIIIi
I iiiilillZl
1.026 66
- zI II:

0.975 _ i iii
I 54
I ,ezx

0.925 --
llli]l AxI^t
CHOR0 52 I

0.876 6O

0.825 I 1 I I I 48 I I I I I

1.075 58 -

1 .026 56

.,z:.'z_nzzzzzzUzZlllllliilllllZz.zzzzzzn
0.975 54
-zlIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIZIIIII
I .IfllllIllllll E01 1

0.925 -- CHORD 52
llllil]llliJ AxIAL

0.8?5 50

0.825 I I I I I 48 I I I I I
50 70 90 I ]0 130 I 50 5O 70 90 I l0 I 30 150
X PITCH % PIICH

Figure 2 l.--Concluded.

79
RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE
RELATIVE EACH NUHBER

i " 50 [ 65
I =
z z •
*it Z
I ,z[ 61
I "35 --
..I "
z-
• "1-" 57
z
z
1 "2Q --'== • 10.0 X
I
PIICH Zzz

t 53
I "05 --
m
I z •

I _9 z
0"90 --
u i =T
I
I I I II J
0"75
I I I ",5

1.50 -- 65
I I
_g
I b]
[ .35 -- • Z

.I • Z
qeg

I "
57
1.2_ -- ! 20, X
z z I
PITCH
I [
z I I[z •
1.05 --
I I
z z

I I ,
• Z
0.90 -- i •
• I
I
II 1 I I i II ]
0.75
I I _5

1.50 -- 65
I =
I

1.35 --
I "% bl • • Z
<
I"-
I ; "='l

-=
57
1.20 "-,= z Zz
30. X
I
I
PITCH
%
53
! .05 -- ! t •
I z
z
z

0.90 - _9 t"I
Z
m

I
m I

I 1 I I1 I _5 I I [ I[ l
0.75 90 135 -90 -_'5 0 _'5 9O 135
-90 -_5 o '1.5
X CHORD X CHORD

Figure 22.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 30-percent span and near peak efficiency. Broken lines denote location o
blade leading and trailing edges.

8O
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOE ANGLE

! .50 65 --
I
Ic •

I .35 61 -- m

%
Z

1.2Q 57 --
z z

,I

! °05
I %
53 -- Z

I | I £ •
II •

0.90
I i
;Ill Z i
ze • e _9 --
• m

I I
0.75 I I J I I IF5 I I I 11

I .50 65 -
I I
zz

I " ,I
I .35 Z 61 -
I ,,,"
• • IIz
1.20 z 57 - z

50. X
I
z PITCH
1.05 I ,, 53 -
I Z
Z

Z
lit zz Z
a II1_ o
0.90 _9 --
I

0.75 I I I T5
I II I

! •50 - 65 --

• z z

1.3B - 6] --

1 20 -- • • owl
57 --
• z z
• Z 60, X
z
P]TCH lit z

1.0S -- 53 --
I z • • f ,
Iz
Z
II "

0.90 -- .1 • H? --
1
I I
0.75 I l II I '_5 I I 11 I
-90 -H5 0 H5 9O ] 35 -go -q-5 0 H5 9O 135

X CHORD X CHORD

Figure 22.--Continued.

8l
RELA1]VE MACH NUMBER RELAT]VE FLON ANGLE

I .50 -- b5
I =. J

I
I .35 -- dK bi

,5: 57
I .Eg == 7O.X
z

P]TCH

I .05 -- '5, 53
_ mn •

5 I1=

°i •
0.90 -- o i ur9

0.75 I I I _5
I I I

1.50 -- b5 --
I z
==
I
I • I
1.36 -- 61 --

E_

I
1.20 _= =
.]. 57 --

1.05 -- z 53 -- ,k_% ....


Ilu
z

iiw _. Z
0.90 -- _9 --

0.75 $5
I I I I

1.35 -- 65

z= • _ T
s an

I. 2q -== =

":"';]1
[It'
1.05 -- 57

0.90 -- 53
-- II z l

I
0.75 --

O.bO
I 1 . I II I 'l-5
9O -_5 o 'F5 90 135 90 -'_5 O _5 90 1 35
x CHORD % CHORD

Figure 22.--Concluded.

82
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELAIIV[ FLON ANGLE

1.4-- b 3 "--'_ZIl zZ ZZz Zz ZZZZZ Z'Z'Z ZZ| ZzzZzzZ Z_ZZZrZ ZZA" _''7"Z _

1.2 "_ zzzsz* xxzBzlz_z "_ am* _* • _ zszzX_szzzz zr_ls x _ • 6]

1.0 59
-IO0 x
AXIAL
0.8 CHORD 57

0.6 5E

0,4" I I I I I 53 I I I I I

63 _z zZzzZZzzZ:Zzzxz:zzzzzzZz:zzzzz_zZz_zzzzzzzzz.-XXzZ

1.2 "_z li! "_ i| _sz = | • mmi|l • |l! zzzzzz • _mz z=zm_nl_m 6! -

l.O 59 -
-80. X
AXIAL
O.8 CHORD 57 --

0.6 E5 --

0.4- I I I I I s3 I I I I I

|.q. m

63 -,,tzzZxTxZzZzZ:ZZzzzzZzZzZzZzZzZZzZzxrZzzzz:zxXztzrzx

!.2
I II illlll II Im IP IIImlll Illlll iiilll Illl II II I Illllll I!1
61

1.0 59
-76. X
AXIAL
0.8 CHORD 57

0.6 55

o.+ I I I I I 53 I I I I I
O 20 fl'O 60 80 I O0 20 _0 60 gO ] O0
X PIICH X PITCH

Figure 23.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 30-percent span and near peak efficiency.

83
_EL^IIVE MACH NUMBER RELA1]vE FLOW ANGLE

I.R- 63 -ZIIIIIIII ;riiIIII

IIziiii izIizzII IIIIZIIIIIKIIIIIIF

1.2 --s-t_• _" *:°':w':"= I'_= = :'::'"*z = _ _ =_:: z: zln: 61

1,0 59
-60. X
AX|AL

0.8 CHORD 57

0.6 66

I I 1 I I 53
I i i I ,I
0._

63
-- iziZlziiiIizii
.iII Izxll .

IZZZ ZA "ZIIzZIZ/IZZZZ'ZIZZIII

1.2 % I ,n: erssIszzzCZ_ azwz : • E jma ee,8 le. z_w* el wml_w_ _w 61

1,0 59
-_0. X
AXIAL
CHORO 57

65

I I I I J 53
I I I I I
0,4

63
-- iizlliiZllii

oo exul • _ em o •
1.2 61
IEmsnl••i

1,0 59
-20. X
AX ] AL

0.8 CHORD 57

0.,6 m 55

I I I I I 53 I I I I I
0,4
• 0 60 8O I00 ?0 _-0 60 80 !00
0 20
X PITCH X P]ICH

Figure 23.--Continued.

84
RELAT]VE NACH NUMBER
RELAT]VE FLON ANGLE

I,T--
63 --
lllI
I I

].2 B • IEle !
I
• Z
6] -- ZZZzzzZZzrxz.xZZz2L_zzZl_xzzzz •
e_u z zzzl_11zzz zz

1,0 59 m
-]0. X

&XIkL
0.8 CHORD 57

0.6
55

0,_ I I I I I 53 I I I I J

|.q- --
63 --

e_e_ 8

1.2 -- Z I I
Z_z z J -- Z ZZZZZzzzz:xzZzzzzZ:Xzz Zzzz_xZzzz zzzzzz
zzzszz z

l.O 5_
-6.l X
^X]^L
0.8 CHORO 57

0.6 E6

I I I I I I I I I I
53

I.q 63 --

III
1.2
61
ZzzZ _,_zZ I IZZZzzzz_rzzzrznz'_nez_rz_u=,_8_,_ =

1.0 59
-2.6 X
AX]AL
0.8 CHORO 57

0.6 55

O,q- I I I I I I I I I I
53
20 q'O 60 80 1 O0 0 20 q-O 60 130 i O0
X P]TCH X PITCH

Figure 23.--Continued.

85
gELATIU[ FLOH ANGLE
gELA]IUE MACH NUHBEg

63
ZI
I
].2 61
-- ] ][XZZz _z_ zz mmz_z zzzzr Zzmmm

i]. Zll II::U 8 mll z:lr 8cmz mx Z


==Z

1.0 59
0.0 X
AXIAL

0.6 CHORD 57

0.6 65

I I 1 I I 53
I I I J J
O.at

_eq" --
63

61
z ['I X ¢zzz zzzzxT_z zZ E

z z_ zzlrz=z ezzz=w_ Lls=z ¢zzZzz

I1.0
•2 IT,=.'"" 59 I
2.5X

AXIAL

0.8 -- CHORO 57

0.6 - 55

I I I I I I I I
o.at J I 53

]eat
63

1.2 61
_ Z Cz rsz Zzzx zwz zz I ZlEZxz_zuz x_ Ix 8 mz _ zzZI_Z

l,O 59
5.0X
AXIAL

0.8 CHOI_O 57

0.6 55 -

I I I I ]
o._ I I I I J 53
I00 0 20 q'O 60 80 !00
o 20 atO 60 80
X P J "I'CH
X PIICH

Figure 23.--Continued.

86
RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER

b3

b!
Ixzzm
I •2 -.,I
.......... " zI
I zzzlc.wzz,zs_z zzz_zz_zzz.zzi_tI_czz z

z
5q B
1.0
7,6X z

AXIAL
, z]
CHORD 57
0,8 ZZ

0*6 -- E6

I I I I I I I I I I
0._ 53

63

1.2 6]

]zzzl_m_zlz _zlwzlzl[ZZzmzzzl Z zzzz ZZZZZz

1.0 59 z
10. X
AWIAL
z zI
CHORO 57
zZ

E6

I I i I I 53
I I I I
O.q"

|._. m 63

_m_m_zumm
Z_ _ m
m
1,2 61
J m m mm_K I

s8 m_ 8mzlr'z a EzlZSZzZzZ ZZ ZZZZ_[lr.Jr ZK


59
1.0
13, X
AXIAL IC

CHORD 57
O.B
zzzz_]

0.6 55

I I I I I I I I I
--J 53
0._ 8O LO0
20 _0 60 80 lO0 20 _0 60

X PITCH X PITCH

Figure 23.--Conlinucd.

87
RELAT]VE MACH NUMBER I_ELAT]UE FLOH ANGLE

1.7 60
ziE I

_t I :L_ZZZzZZZZzzzzz z

1.5 58
......... z

zhrtzzZI
I:
1.3 56
]5. X
AXIAL

].1 CHORD 5't-

0.9 52

0.7 I I I I I 5O
I I I I

1.7 6O

il"z z zz zz zZ:Z Zzz zZ zZ Z Z3Zz Z Z

1.5 58 Z

z
1.3 56
23. X 1
z
^X]^L
ZzzZ ZZZzzzZTI
I.I CHORD 5't"

0.9 52

0.7 I I I I .I 5O I I I I .I

!.7 bO --

I][ ][Z Z ZZ Z:ZZZZZ][Z ZZ Z'Z Z][:Z


T
1.6 i

G8 - Zz ]1|
z
1.3 56 -
25. X
lliiIIII I

"--. ..... zt] AXIAL


Izxzz'rllIZilliiI_
1.! CHORO 5AF --

0.9 52

0.7 I I I I l 50 I 1 I l __sJ
0 20 q-O 60 eo 100 2 22 • 2 62 82 102
X PITCH X PIICH

Figure 23.--Continued.

88
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE

1.7-- b0 --

_ZZxZx z-z z z._ zz Ix =


1,5 58 "-z
I

1.3 56 -- z
30. X

AXIAL

1,] CHORD 5'1- -- ZzzzZZIIIIiiiii


ill•I•

O.9 6E --

0,7 I I I I ..I 5o I I I I .. I

|./ m 60

].6 58 ZZIIIZIIIII|II
• _==m em z
I =m _ wt¢
Z
].3 56
z
="='="= I 33 • X
• AX] AL
• I
5_r
==="="=====,==x CH 0 R O
Z_zZZIZIIiiiiiiiziZiI II

0.9 -- 62 --

0.7 I I I I ..I 5O 1 I I I

].? bO

1.6 EB
_zx'XZZz//Zzz
,Zz_llrllll811
Z
1.3 56 Z
36, X
Z
AXIAL
1.! CHORD 5q" zz_zzIIII I II•
illlliiiiI
I

0,,9 5E

0.7
I I I l ..I 50 I I I _._J
20 _0 60 80 100 22 _E 62 BE I02
X PITCH x PITCH

Figure 23.--Continued.

89
RELAT]VE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE

1°7-- 60

1.5 58
t ttlizzi
I
1.3 56 l
_'0. X z
AXIAL I

!.! CHORD 54
ZzzzzIIIIi _iZI
]I_illiIIlZ IIu

0.9 62

0.7 I J ] I .I 5O 1 1 I I .... I

1,7 bO --

1.6

i.3
_3. X
" tI
56 IlZzz
I z
AXIAL
I
1.1 CHORD 54 -
ZZzzzZI]]I, I
_IIii.ZlilZlIillIlltI
0.9 62 -

0.7 I I I I ...I 5G I I I I .... j

let --

i]
58

1.6
1,3
-IIZz,,,L
-- Iz
i] I
Ii '_6, X 56 ti z
IZl z

Zz .I AX ] AL z I
1.1 - z
CHORD 54 II
8I_ I

ZZlllIIIllIiizzZzzzzzzzzzZZ zzzzz
0.9 - 52

I I I J 50 I I I I I
0.7 6 2O _FO 60 80 I00 22 42 62 BE lOE
X PITCH % PITCH

Figure 23.--Continued.

gO
RELAT]UE MACH NUMBER RELA1]VE FLON ANGLE

! .7 -- 60

! ,5 58

I o3 --I II 56

^X]^L ]

",, -. .... • zl 60. x lltI

O.? I. I - "'. ... CH0,_D 5'_ _l{


62 IIillilllz
z zzzzZZzzz
]

o.,.- J l i .._j _o[ J "H'"'"";"i ....


i

I .75 60
]

! .66 68

1.15|
°35 IIx= === ." CHORo^X]AL60"
X 541"56 h.l

o. 95 .......... .... . , sa / IllIIllllzzzz z z==Z'z"'='r[]l'l


o.;,s / I I I I I so / I 'I""'"" 1 J ..... I

1.75

I .66
s+ Izzz
I
1,35
xz 66, X
AXIAL
_ Illllzzi ill lxl"t'x zlZX"x x"xzzZXZXx]
1.15


-- CHORD 50

Jr
II I

Illw

0.95

0.75 I
ao
,-17"
_o
..... 60 so
._.1
1oo
_6 I I I I .... I
22 _2 62 82 102
X P]TCH
X PITCH

Figure 23.--Continued.

91
RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
RELATIVE MACH NUMBE_

56
1.75 -

5'I" illi xzzZ xz''zl


I .55 - I Zz x
tl. zzZ
i iI
IIrlllllilIIlZ
52
1.35
60, %
AXIAL
Zz
_NnDn _n

RELAT]VE HACH NUHBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE

.825 N-9.5

.7/5 IilIilIlIIlIZIIz I _8.0


Z I iillllll -iIIiiIiIIIIttlt]tlItll I

IIIIZITIIIIIIIII
I
,725 _6.5

.6/5
'll IO0
AXIAL

CHORD
X

_5.0

.625

,575
,,Jl,, I
N3.5

_2,0 I I
IIIIIIIITIIIIIIIIIIIIII

I l I

.825 51.0
llllIllllIlIllIlll
- I -IIZIllllllllllll
.776 q-9.6

.725
117 X
_8.0

ttlIi_I II
1111111111111
, ,Ill ,,
AXIAL
.675 CHORD %6.5
- {1111,,j
.625 @6.0

,575 { i I I I _3.5
{ l { { {

m
.825 51.0 -

__IilllllIllllIlllll
I
.775
I
illlIllZI IIlIlllill]
I
.725 _8.0 -- T
z 1I

.675
_ti]I
RELATIVE NACH NUMfiER RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE

1.7 bO --

].5 58

!.3 --IZXzz 56
50. X
z z
AXIAL
z
[I
!.! Zz z CHORD 51. I
z

0.9 59 llilllllli I

0.7 I I I I .... l 50 .... i

1.75 bO

I .56 68

1.35 56
50. X

I I
AXIAL
' [zI
1.15 CHORO 5q"
I

III

0.95 5E
|I
Imo
hqq
B
--
we
mo_.
w
--mm.
9e
eI IIIIIIIIi I ..=..z] I

0.75 I I I I I 50
/ I ZzzzIz'_===='l===" I ..... j

1.75 - 56

61.

52
66. X
AXIAL
CHORD 5O

1.8

0.75 1.6 I I I I .... I


0 20 'tO 60 80 1 O0 E E2 _2 bE 82 ]DE
X PITCH X PIICH

Figure 23.--Continued.

91
@ELAIIVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE

1.75 -- 56

! .55 5'_ IIII 1 zzzzzzzz'zz]


Iii z

IlliiiiilIlilizII
1 .35 52
60, X

AXIAL
IIzmwl CHORD
I .15 50

wl u

0.95 i

I I I l 1].... I _6
I I I I I
0.75

I .75 -- 56

I .65 -- 64"

xt_+_'''+]
!.35 52
65, X I iI IIl
AXIAL I iI

1.15 CHORD 5O
Iz I IIIiiiiiiiiiiiIXIIZ
gl
II #

0.96
I
I I I i ! J q.6
I I I I .....
I
0.75

56 m
I,,,2 m

64" m

52
70. X -- TiiIiZZxIZZZXZI

AXIAL
CHORO 5O _ lli IIIl-

_8
lIiI.iiiIiiillIIlll

0,2
I I I I I 't"6 I J i l i .....
J
0 20 4-0 60 80 1 O0 2 22 4"2 62 82 ! 02
X PITCH X PIICH

Figure 23.--Continued.

92
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE

1.2 56 --

],0 54

0.8 52
t 80. X
IIIIIIIZZ zxzzzzzz_zz]
AX]AL
0,6 CHORD 5O
- iii It

0.'t- 't"8
- _zzzlii IIIII

0,2 I I I I ...J _6 ...J

1.2 5,1. --

- t
I.O
62 -- iliiii IzzzIzzIzzzz'zzz:zzI]

I
0.8 50 -

- iIIlIII
z 90. X

AXIAL
0.6 -- CHORD
$8 IzillIIlIlI

0._ _F6 -

0.2 I I I I I ,+_. I I I I
0 20 _0 60 eO -ZOO 0 20 40 60 80 O0
x PITCH x P]3CH

Figure 23.--Continued.

93
RELAT|VE MACH NUMBER gELATIVE FLOH ANGLE

1.2-- 5_

1.0 52 -hztIzzzH=_=_'=zt!
. =wO_ W_''! o

0.8 5O
]0o x
AX|AL iiiiiiill
IIIIIIIG_]
CHORD 9.8

N6

I I I I I I i J
0.2

1,2

I°0 52

5O ]iliiIiIiiiiiII IIIIIIIIIII
0.8 -- e z t_ uu ||Z X
I I
AK]AL

0.6 CHORD

0.4-

I I I I I I I I I I
0.2

1.2 B 5q-

I.O m 62

m _wg_ _ g u

0.8 u_o"w'mmmwmmZmmm_wm=mcZi]kJmm
m mmmm=._o wi.O_ ._ 1,_w_ 5O tlIIIIIIIIIIlIIIIIIIIHII
]36 X

AXIAL

0.6 CHORD 9-8

0._- mr6

I I I I I 9-9-
I I I I I
0.2 90 !!0 ! 30 150
50 70 90 110 130 !50 50 70
X P| ICH x PITCH

Figure 23.--Concluded.

94
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER
RELAT]VE FLOW ANGLE
1,35 -- I 60.5 • z,,
I z I
! .20 -- -. I,. I 56.5 --
l
Z Z Z_

l I
I .05 -- z
I lO.O X
52.5 -- I
PIICH
0.90 -
_g.5 --
z

0.76 --
_F_.E -
z z zZ
I I:
I I
0.60 I II I I I I I II I I I
tFO.5

].35 --
62.5 I

i •Z
I
Z Z z •

l .20 -
58.6
• Z z Z
Z
z

!.05 -
5_.5
z 20. X
PITCH
0.90 -- Z
50.5 z
s z
I
z z
0.76 -- • zz
_6.6 I I I zIi I
zI
O,&O I _2.5 I I I

I .35
62.5 -
I .
• zzz •

1.20
6B.6 - • ,
• zl

] .05 - zl z
5_.5 --
I 30. X
z PIICH
0.90 -- I
z
50.5 --
I I

0.75 -- I z z z I
I
_F6.5 --
I
I I z zzi t
I zI

I Jl t I I I I
0.60
-'00 _2.5 I I I
-q'5 IO 65 120 175 O0 -_5 10 65 120 175
X CHORD
% CHORD

Figure 24.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 40-percent span and near peak efficiency. Broken lines denote location of
blade leading and trailing edges.

95
RELA11VE HACH NUNBER RELATIVE FLOH &NGLE

1.35 -- z 62.5
I • I
z B •

1._0 -- •
. -Y z
• 58.5 -- =Z_z

1.05 -- 54`.5 B

z
_'0. X Z

PIICH Z

0.90 -- 50.5
I

z
i
0.75 --
• =z
_6.5 I zI ZZZZz!
I
I I I J
0.60 4`2.5

1.35 -- 62.5 B

I Z
. I
J
zz z

58.5
I .20 - Z8 • ZZ
Z
• Z z

! .05 -- 5_.5
50. X
Z
PITCH
Z

0.90 -- 50.5
It

• Z

==_ • zz z
4`6.5 ZZzZ j I Z ZI I I
0.75 --
I I
I I I I I I I I
_2.5
0.60

1.35 -- 62.5
I
j,
zZ

I
I .20 -- • z •
68.5
z • zz I
z

Z
I
1.05 - 5_.5
bO. X I
P]1CH
I
0.90 -- 50.5 Z

Z I
z Z
me • Zz

4-6.5 zZzz_ I Z ZI I I
0.75 --
I

I I I I 4`2.5 I I I 1
O.bO 65 120 175
-4`5 0 65 120 175 O0 -4`5 10
-100
X CHORO
X CHORD

Figure 24.--Continued.

-Lk
96
RELAI]VE NACH NUMBER
RELATIVE FLOM ANGLE

!.35 --
62.5 --
• == I
1.20 -
z
58.5 -- • -,L.
I"
] .05 - 5_,5 --
I
z
?O.X
I
P] ICH
0.90 -- 50.5 - I =
z

I
• •z •
0.76 - _6.5 - I IZzz':_ I Z Zii 1
I I
0.60 _E.5 I II I I I I

1,35 62.5 --
I
• z I

I .20 ..¢
68.6 --
Z • i

1.05 5_.5 -
80. X
P] ICH
0.90 50.5 -
I
I Z

I
= • IZZzI I
• zzz
O,7E • 6.5 --
z zz I I

0.60 I I _-2.5 I I I

! .35 62.5 --
I z• I
I .20 I
• . i I 50.5 --
•z
rz I
iI
! .05
1 5_.5 - :Zl
90. X
PITCH
l
0.90

0.?5 --
It, u
• • z z
z
z
50.5

• 6.5
--

--
I
1z
z zzz I
z
I
0.60 I I 1 I _2.s I I I I
-I00 -'1-5 0 65 120 175 - OO -'t5 0 65 120 175
x CHORD X CHORD

Figure 24,--Concluded.

97
REL^I]VE FLOW ANGLE
REL61IVE M&CH NUMBER

62.0

1,25
! .20 I 60.5 iizzZliIll/illUIllIlttIIIIIIIlIIIIIllzZZzZlZZi z

] lIIIII
I, ,Illh IIIIIIIIll
59.0
I. I5 F I_IIIIIIlItII]I IIIIIItIIII_ ' -80, X
AXIAL
CHORD 57.5
.10

66.0
.O6

I I I I, ,1 I I I I I
5_-,5
°00

62.0

60.6
•2 0 i1_]IIIIIIIIiIIIIII_i "_iiIllIIlIIIlIIIIIiiii
] _III II i IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIXlIIIIITI

59.0
-_0, X
•t5 ]--_iiii]iiiIiiiiIIIIIil AXIAL
CHORO 57.5
• I0 --

56.0
.06 -

I I [ I .I
.oo I I I I I 5_.5

62,0 --
,25

_IIIIl1IIIIIIIZIIzIiIi iiiiIII 60.6


.20
-- _t[ItTIIIIuIII
z i Iz
I _ _ dI i ZZZzzzzzz
Iill zliZlllllllxlKllI Iz"
59.0
.15 - I iIll -20, X
AXlkL
_ IIIiitlIIII CHORO '37.5
1.10

56.0
1.05

I I I I I
I I I I .J 5_. s
l .00
eo ,o 60 so !oo _ 2_ *_ 62 02 zo2
X PITCH I PITCH

Figure 25.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 40-percent span and near peak efficiency,

98
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE

.25 62.0 --

.2O _IIIIIIil .IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITII 60.5 --


iiII*

I ii
.15 - I 59.0
-IO. X
iII _nzzz_i_ilI_IIIIIIhzzZzIZinzzzmzZzzZ_
AXIAL
.lO _ I iI CHORO 57.5

I]iIiII
.O6 56.0

.00 I l I I I 54.5 I I I I

,25 m
62.0

I iZiiiiiiiZIiIIIIIIZIIlIIIIII
.2O 60.5
_ I flITI

z ÷ I ]]iliz z
.15 59.0
I -5,0 X
I I z_zzlI]I zz,,'zzmZ'z'Z'ZzZ'"",m,
zm,
^WIAL
I
CHORD 51.5

- Iiiii
_
56.0

.00 I I I I I 5_.5 I I I I I

.25 62.0

.20 _iiiiiiiIIiiiIiIIIIItIIIIIIIIIIIIt I 60.6

ZZ Z I
ftlIzzzz
.15 iz zI O.O X
59.0

I AXIAL
-- IzIIZzZIIZZIZZIIIZIzzIzIIIzzIIIIIIZziIi ]
i .10
-If CHORD 57.5

l
1.05 56.0

I .00 I I I l I 5_.5 I I I I I
20 _O 60 80 lO0 2 22 q'2 b2 B2 102
X PIICH X PITCH

Figure 25.--Continued.

99
RELAT]VE NACH NUNBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE

.825 -- q-9.5

.775 ...ILIZzIzIIZIIIZIz
I _8,0
Z

I _6.5
.725
]00 X
AXIAL
.675 CHORD 45,0 --

.626

.575
,II I I I
• 3.E

_2.0
-
--
IIIIItlEIItlIIIIIIItI

.825 D 51 .O
IIIiiIIIIIIiIIIIii

.lib - I _9.5

.725
I

I |I7 X
4B.O
- , :ill
]ttlitltlttlIllllI:]
II . .,.
t AXIAL
CHORD 46.5
.675 :I

.626 _-E.O

.575 I 1 I I I 43.5 . I I I I I

• 825 -- 51.0

.77E __IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITII

.725
I

I
izlZiiiII
IIIIIIIIIII

48.0
- :]L
II 13_ %
AXIAL
I
.675 CHORD _6.5 _IIII:IIIHIIIIIH:I
III{]]III:II:IIIHII
:111
.625 R _5.0

I I I I I I I I I ,,]
.575 43.5
50 ?0 90 liD 130 150 50 70 90 110 1 30 150

% PITCH X PIICH

Figure 25.--Continued.

100
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELAllVE FLOW ANGLE

,825 51.0 --

.775 _9.5 -
-IIIIIIIIIIIIIITIIIIII JlZlillilIZI

z tII IIzzzI-
.725 _
i I
ziII
IBI
AXIAL
X
_8,0
- t
.675 CHORD _6.5
IIIIIllliIlIIIIIlll
Ill ]][/lllI:l:::iillllII
.625 _5.0 --

,5?5 I I I I I _3.5 I I I I I

,825 51.0

iIllIIlllIlIIIIIIIlll
.775 -- L -']IIllllllIllIIIll _9.6

qlll]l
Iv
.725 _f8.O
16BX
AXIAL
.675 CHORD _6.5

.626 q-6.O

.575 I I I I I _3,5 I I I I I

.9O 51.0 --

.85 N-9.6

.80 $8.0
185 X
AX]AL
.?5 CHORD N'6.5

.70 '(-5.0

.65 I I I I I _3.5 I I I I I
50 70 90 I I 0 l 30 150 50 70 90 llO 130 150
X PITCH X P]TCH

Figure 25.--Concluded.

lOI
RELATIVE FLON kNGLE
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER

1.35 - 6O
I •

l =z _.,- i
I 55
1.20 --
"u" ]
• #
• I 5O
l .05 --
I I0.0 X I
PIICH
I •
0.90 q-5 t II Ii
l
Z I II
I '_0
0.75 Z I, t
I l
I Z
I zx z
I II I I I I I
0.60 35

I .35 -- 60 m

1 .20 -- 55

1.05 _ 5O

0.90 -- u
z
II I
l z z
0.75 - u zz X

• • Zz z z •

I ,I 35
I I
0.60

1.35 -- 6O m

i 1 1.1 I
I. 55
] .20 --
i I
,f
I
1 .05 -- • Z 5O
30. X
I
PITCH
x I
0.90 --
1
• I
• i

0.75 -- 90 zz! z

• 1 _l z zz I
I I ] 35 I I I I 1
0.60 175
O0 -q5 1o 65 120 175 O0 -'4-5 0 65 120
X CHORD x CHORD

Figure 26.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 50-percent span and near peak efficiency. Broken lines denote location of
blade leading and trailing edges

102
RELAT]VE NACH NUMBER RELAT]VE FLOH ANGLE

1.35 -- bO -- :1
g
I

1.20 ,r 55

f
.4'
z
1,05 m 5O
q'O. ,1[

PIICH

0.90 't'5

z _z zZ
z
mm z • z
0,75 q'O

I II I I I I J
O.bO 35

6O m
1 .35 --
I
*%

I .20 -- i..- 5G
-r
• z Z

1.05 _z 5O
50, X

PIICH

0.90 -- q'5
w

m • z ZzZ_f z z I_ z zI
0.76 -- 'tO
• • • _t wl
I
I ,I I I I I J
O.bO 35

1.35 -- 60
_F •
I • I

1.20 -- le. 66

1.05 _= • 5O
60. X
PITCH
0.90 -

m zZ : z zZz zI
*z I
0.75 - • • _s n I
I

o.6o I I I J 35
1 I I ,I
O0 -_5 o b5 120 175 -IOO -')s 0 65 120 175

X CHORD x CHORD

Figure 26.--Continued.

103
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELAI]VE FLOH &MGLE

I .35 60 --=
#
I . z I

I
I .20 55 -
• zig

• 11= z •
m
!,05 50 -
70. X
PITCH
0.90 _5 - z
i
z z

===zzx]
0.76
==
= • m= • mZ _0 - I
I
0.60 I I 35 I I I I

1.35 60 --=

I • = I
I .20
I
65 -
t

1.05 r:, 50 --
I

0.90
I
_5 --
I
z,z=j • z f= zl
0.76 I • im 1 u m lug "[ • 0 -- I
i I I
0.60 i il i i I I i i J I
35

I ,35 60 -=
I • , I
1.20 B

• • z'_ ] 56 -
"I
I=
l .05 50 --
I
90. X
I" I
PITCH
I I

]
0.90 _S --
I
I I •
z _ z zI
0,75 i = •Z _0 -- I
I I
I

0.60 I Ji I I I I 35 I II I I I
O0 -_5 I0 65 120 175 - O0 -_5 10 120 175
X CHORD ,t" CHORD

Figure 26.--Concluded.

I04
RELA1]VE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE

.5 6O
iiiiiZiiIIiiiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlIIIIlllIIIiIiI

,q 58

.3 56
-80. X
AX)AL
.2 CHORD 5'1"

.I 52
-'[ZZZ_zzz IIZEZZzZIzIzzzIzIZZZIzZZZIIZZZIIZIzzIIZZz

,0 I I I I I 50
I I I I I

,5 60 --

If,,.IIIlIllIIlIIllZllIizliIi
_.._l II.ZIIIIIIII ZZIi iIZI7
I.'F 68

1.3 56 --
-90. X
AXIAL
1.2 m CHORD 5'F --

-- IIIIIZZIIZ zzZ Ix z zZ z'x/x'z Zz ZZzx-x z


I.I 62 --
ZZZZIIZZZI_ZIIIzZZ

1.0 I I I I I 5O
1 I I I I

1.5 60 --

68 _ IlllIIIlllIlllIIIZzizzzi
zZ_znzzzxzzzziZzZZIII x.z

1.3 56
-20, X
aNX] AL
1.2 CHORD 5_

ZZZ Z ZZIXZIZ I'ZZZ_z2 z

I°1 -- zzI .iziZZZZIZZZXz: 52

IIIIIIIIIIIIL

1°0 I I I I I 5O I I I I I
0 20 @0 60 80 I O0 2 22 _2 62 B2 102

X P|ICH X P]ICH

Figure 27,--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 50-percent span and near peak efficiency.

I05
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELAIIVE FLOW ANGLE

.5 6O

58
- "IllllttltZlz zz
zZzzzrZiiII t I iZzzzzZlzzzZZZzzzzzzzz
.3 56
-]0. X
kK]AL

.2 CHORD 5q

Zl_Zz. Z
-- I z lZlllz G[ zzxzzz r z zz z l:x x'z z zz xzz
.! 62

zzziiiPLiIII

I ] I I I 5O
I I I I I
.0

• 25 - 6O

.15 - 58
illlzlZZllllZllZt'ZtlllllZZllzllltZZZ - illiZZZznzzzi _
l
l
z
56
ZllllI
I zzzz_=='""'=='===='=====
z
I
• 05 z -B.O X
l
l I AXIAL
IIlIl
0.95 -- CHORO

0,85 --

I I I I 1 5O
I I I I I
0.75

l ._5 -- bO

1.16 -- II 58
zZZlZI[ZZZZlZ=SZ_lZSll ==zzzZlZZlZZZZZzlz
IZzzzzZzz I
z z I
56 -- IzzxZZZZXZXrZZZznzzZZxzx'zz_Xxlx.Zl _
I .05 _[z z z
O.OX
AX ] AL

0.95 CHORD 5_

0.85 52

I I I I I 50 I [ I I
0.75
20 _0 60 80 100 2 22 _2 62 82 l 02

I PIICH X PITCH

Figure 27.--Continued.

106
RELATIVE HACH NUMBER RELAIIVE FLOW ANGLE

.9 q-6.5

.8 'f'f,5

.7 _2.5
I00 x iiiIIIIIIIIIIII
AXIAL
CHORD _0,5

I
,6 .jiii IIIIII

.6 38.5

I 1 I I 1 36.5

.9 - q.7,5

.8 =f6.6 m

z I=lz Irl _1 II Irllll== ¢ll I


I
.7 iiZ =zZX=zZz x=zzz'm====
_3,5
I
115 X
Z AXIAL
]itiiiiztiIzZZ[IIIIIIIt
.6
'I] CHORD _1.5

.6 39.6

I I I I I I
37.5

• 9 - =1.7,5 D

.8 =1-6.6

iiiiiiiiiii
II]]Iii it
z zZ z zl zz z z_ zzzz'zI[IZzzz

.7 Z z IzzZZ zzzz:zzzzzzzzz $3,5


130 X
_ill zz AXIAL

.6 CHORD _1.5

• 5 -- 39.5

I I I I I 37.5 1 I I l J
50 70 90 110 ]30 ]50 50 70 90 IIO 130 150

X PITCH % PITCH

Figure 27.--Continued.

107
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE

1.5-- _6 --

1.3 ,,- :{],


1.1 B
{_4 X

AXIAL

0.9 B CHORD _0 --

o g No o_ •
0.7 ,row ,,,_"_ _ _q,m I mz_l[zz.l_z_z#f••_g_l_,B_Ni, 38 --

0.5 I i I I I 36 - i I I I I

1.5 '1"6 --

{.3

I.{
159 X _2 llliiItliiiiiiiiiiiiiilI
AXIkL

0.9 CHORD _0

0.7 38

0,5 I I - t I I 36
I I I I I

|mS -- 't-6 --

!.3 _4
- Hill
1.] q'2
{7T X 5ttit:::h:z{it{:{iIII ttI ]]ItlIItlIIiI{:::
AX]AL

0.9 CHORD q'O

0.7 38

0.5 I 1 I I I 36 I I 1 1 I
5O 70 90 { I0 130 { 50 50 70 90 I lO 130 150

X PITCH X PIICH

Figure 27.--Concluded.

108
RELATIVE NACH NUMfEg RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE

! .35 IZ z
55 -- i
I x=z_X X

1.20
I
50 -- I
I I
!
1.05
:,Lz z
_5 --
Z z
IO.O X
x
Z "1
PITCH
0.90
,d
_0 --
I
i = i zI
O.?E I z
36 Zz Z lr
I
0.60 I II I I I 30 I II 1 I I I

1.35 55 --Z lxZ


• ,]iL

I .20 5O

i[

Z
1.05 _5

0.90 _0

z z I
0.75 35
zZ_ X z

0.60 I II I I J I
3O

1.35 57.5 B

I IZz Zj
][

1.20
I Zz db
52.5
le "

• i_ • z
1.05 -- z q7.5
30. X
Z z ,-,I Z
PITCH
0.90 I z q-2.5
I
z •

0.75 I
•u 37.5 -- I Ix z
I u e m 8 •
z
z z Z z

0.60 I II 1 I I I 32.5 1 II I I I I
O0 -_5 I0 65 120 175 O0 -_5 lO 65 120 175
X CHORO X CHORe

Figure 28.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 60-percent span and near peak efficiency. Broken lines denote location of
blade leading and trailing edges.

109
REL&TIVE MACH MUMBER REL&T]VE FLOW ANGLE

1.35 -- 57.5
I ZZ Z zl

Z zZ ,
I 52.5
I .20 -
I,.
•'t" • ql.5 --
] .05 - z I¢
• 0, X
x ',x •
PITCH Z

0.90 - q'2,5 --

z
0.75 - 37.6 -- • I
m u Z z •
s a qk: : z Z I

32.5 I i I
0.60

m
).35 -- 57,,5
I zzz zl
z
I 52.5
I .20 --

I,,
] .05 --
'T q'7.5
Z
60. X
Z Z Z Z j e_Z z
z P]TCH Z

0.90 --
I q2.5
z

I Z

0.76 --
I D 37.6 Z z •
I
I
I I
I
II I I I I I
0,60 32°5

m
! .35 -- 57.5
I z z][z I I

I 62.6
! .20 --

! .05 -- z _7.5
Z 60. X
z Z
Z K I u • z
P]ICH
I vr2.5
I
0.90 -
I z

I 37.5 z z i i I II Z
i
K
0
.
7
5
I
I
11 I 1 I 32.5 I I J J I
O.bO
-I00 -_5 10 65 120 1?5 O0 - _5 ! 0 65 120 175

X CHORD X CHORO

Figure 28.--Continued.

llO
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE

! .35 57.5 --
I zz z I

! .20
I z-.l. '
52.5 -
I

1.05
..t,.
8.7°5 --
zZz ?0. X
I °=
PITCH z

0.90
I Z
8.2.5 --
I
0.76 I
37.5 --
i
Zxxz I x Z i z x
I lu
/

0.60 II I I I ] I
32.5

l .20 57°5 --

zZ z I
Z

I .OE u 62.6 --
z_._
zZI u
;[ I Iz
z

0.90 8.7.5 -
80. X I
PITCH z I
I
0.75 8.2.5 -
• Z '] I I
I I Z
zZ
0.60 37.6 - z I

1
O.q-5 32.5 I II I I I

I .20 - 57.5 --

,j
I I ZZz

I .05 - 62.5 -
Ir z
, r
': ]
I
11¢

0.90 -
I
8.7.5 --
90. X
I
PITCH
I
0.75 -
I
8.2.5 -- ]|
I t T
0.60 -- 37.5 --
I ]Zz=
O. q-5 I II ...I...II I 3a.s I . . i .... 1 I
-I00 -8"5 I0 65 120 175 O0 -8.5 0 65 2O 175
,t' CHORO X CHORD

Figure 28.--Concluded.

111
RELATIVE MACH NUHBER gELAT]VE FLOg ANGLE

F
1,10 60.0

I ,05 57.5

I.O0 55.0
-80. X IllilllllllllllllHiIllillllllEIiIillllIIIIll
iIlllllllllElllIlli]llllllllllI]llllllllllllllll
AXIAL

0.95 CHORO 52.5

0.90 60.0

0.85 I I I I I _7,5
I I I I I

E
I.I0 60.0

I .06 67.6

! .00 IlllIllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllIlllllllllllI
55.0 _IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
-_0. X
AXIAL
CHOgO 52.6 --

60,0 --

0.85
I I I I ! 47.5 I I I I I

1.10 - 60.0 -

! .06 lIllIllllIlllIllillE 57.6

I ,00 55.0
-20. X
- _ZzzzzzZzzZzzzzznzzzzlXlZiIlliIllIItIIIIIllZlZZ
q]::iiiillill]lllillllI:l::
AXIAL

0.95 CHORO 52.5

0.90 50.0

0.85 I I I 1 I _?.s I I I I I
o 20 _o 60 so 1oo z zz _z 6z e2 102

X PITCH % P]ICH

Figure 29.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 60-percent span and near peak efficiency.

112
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE

1.10 60.0 --
iIIIIIIIii
znIL ZI! IIIzz
I .05 57.5
- uzzi III
IIi] .iII
1.00 55.0
-I0. X
_.zZzzzZzZZiiiiiIIIllIIIIZzlzzzzzz_xzv.,,zzz..
tiititiii AXIAL
0.95 CHORD 52.5

0.90 BO.O

0.85 I I I l I I I I I I
q.7.5

1.10 60.0
iiiIIIIlIIIIllzzizzzzizrx
iII III
I .06 -,I I 57.6
I I
I I iIIIIIzIzzz
I
1.00 I I 55.0 - .II ZXZZZz zz_,z
I I -6.0 X zzZiiii zizZ zX=zxzxZzzzzx
I I AXIAL
0.95 CHORD 52.5
IIiiII

0.90 50.0

0.85
1 I I I I q.7.5
I I I I I

1.10 --

iiiiiiIliIiZizizziIiziiizzii z 60 • 0
z 'a
I .05 -- I z 67.5
I z
I

I.O0 "I 55.0


-2.5 X
I AXIAL - liIIIlZzz_zZZZZzzz_z_,.,z,..x,z_xZzzz

_nIllI
0.95 - I I CHORD 52.5

t I
0.90 -- 50.0
Itli
0.85 I I I I I _7.s l I I I I
20 • 0 6O 80 100 22 _2 62 82 102

X PIICH X PITCH

Figure 29.--Continued.

113
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOM ANGLE

.725 m _-0.0 J ,

IIIIZlzzIZ| [ Z zz rlZ Zz zz z Zz r.z Z Z_[ ZzZ zzzZ Z

_ I 37.5
.675

.625 35.0
]00 X
^X]^L iiz.Xzzzzzzzzz'Zz zIxz'r'xzxzIzz
.575 CHORD 32.5

'i]
.626 30.0

I I I 27.5 J .j. I I I
,_75

• 75 -- _F5.0
*

• ?0 jIIZIZIZIZII'iI _2.6

I IIIIZZIIIZIIIIIIZZIZIIII

• 65 -- _0.0
112X
AXIAL

•6o- IIJ CHORD 37.5

• 66 -- 35.0
]]]]llliilllllIll
IIIIIIIIII
f I II
.5o I I I I 32.5
I I I

.75 - _5.0 w

.7O

-IIIIIIIIIItlII
t "JlI ILl zzzzzzlzzIzzI zzzlzlil
_2.5
-
.65 _FO.O - I
125 X
AXIAL
t
.60 CHORD 37.5
-itzt[tiiIitlI]

.55 35•0
]itir_zlilizliZZlZIIItll_/I

.so 1 I I I J 32.5
I I I I
so 7o 90 lzo 13o 15o SO 7O 90 110 130 150

X PITCH X PITCH

Figure 29.--Continued.

114
RELATIVE HACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON AMGLE

• 75 -- _5.0

IIIIEIIlIII
• 10 -- - IIIIIIIIII _2.5
] I IIIIIIqIll

• 6s - llliLlli:lllZnZI1 40.0
I38 ,I[
I
.6O AXIAL 37 . 5
CHORO h IIIIIII
III
II
ttlti:zzriiiInInri:
.56

36,0 t
I I I I I 32.5 I I I I I
.5O

.75 -- q-5.0

zI11ZlIzllllli IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITIIII '1.2.6


..7
o _ llllilllZIZ_: 40.0 _ :llll
15! X

.6O
AXIAL
CHORO 37.5
,: lt
iIllIIIIll Ilglil
llZzt:z
:
:::II:I:I:III11

.56 36.0

.50 I I I I I 32.5
I I I I I

.75 -- N.5.0

.7o --zzXzzzzZzzl znzzzzzzzzzzzzz q'2.6 i

.6B IIlllllllIllll
ll':I:::: _0.0
16q X
AXIAL

.6O CHORD 37°5

.55 35,0

.5O I I I I I 32.5 I I I I ]
50 70 90 ! I0 130 150 50 tO 90 110 130 150

X PIICH X PITCH

Figure 29,--Concluded.

115
RELAT]VE NACH NUHBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE

].25 55-_,
I J

1.10
Z

__ • I
0.95
]0.0 X I
Z PITCH
0.80 _ I i 37 --
I
"I

0.66 _ I I
I
0.50 I I I I II 25 I I I

1.25 55z m z

I.lO
I;
q-? --
I • z

= If •
0.95 _-3 --
• q,
20. X z
I
g PITCH
0.80
I 37 --
u
I

0.66 I g
31 --
I m, j t • I
z

0.50 I I I 1 II I 25 I I I ' _lr I

X
1,25 ,,_5 = --z

I" .•'k
5,
l .10 1, • 9 --
I"
m " =1 _3 --
0.95 • % 30. X
-I
PITCH
0.80 --
I
37 --
I
z

0.65 --
I
3] --
z
I
3t •

o.so I i I I II I 25
1 I 1 Ti" I
-75 -30 15 60 105 150 75 -30 15 60 105 150

x CHORD ,t' CHORD

Figure 30.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 70-percent span and near peak efficiency. Broken lines denote location of
blade leading and trailing edges.

116
RELATIVE HACH NUMBER RELA1]VE FLON ANGLE

1.25 -- x
55•

1
l.lO - L
'1"9
.J.

0.95• -. _3
'10. X
Pl TCH
0.80 -- 37

0.65 -- .l 31
Z
I • u •
" 1 Z

0.50 I I Jl I I I1" I
25

1.25 --
55= m
z
I

1.10 -- / _9 r..
L
%
0.95 -- _3
BO. X
PITCH
0.80 - 37

0.66 - "-.J 31 Z

zz_ Z
¢

0.50 I I I 1 I I I If
25

I .25 55• mE

I • • liar I

! .10
I r.
'19 w

%
0.95 B • %
q'3
60. X
u

PITCH
0.80 37

0.65 31 • X
X

I _ z z z

I I I I I I
0.50
75
II I 25 If I
-30 15 60 105 150 75 -30 15 60 105 150
X CHORD X CHORD

Figure 30.--Continued.

117
RELATIVE HACH NUHBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE

1.25 -- 55= z

I
E
"1
I 1"
q'9
1,]0 -- m

,,i
q3
0.95 --. z

I"
I

0°80 --
I 37

I
I z zI
0.66 -- 31 | z
I I_ s z

I II I
0.50 I I I 25

1.25 - 55, --, ..,. z

.I

I.I0 -- q-'t -

q-3 --
0.95 --,
z 80. X
'I
P]ICH

0.80 -- 37 --
I I
I
I
0.65 -- 3] --
I_t zl

25 I ! I I lJ
O.50

I .25 -- It

I t I
i,m

I 'k I
1.10 --
I
I
q-3 -
0.95 --, ,..
z ..I
L I ?0, X I
PITCH
I
0.80 - 37 --

I
I 3] --
O.b5 -- I Z

I u •

I II 11 II J 25 I I1 _1. II I
0.50 150
I05 150 75 -30 ]5 60 105
-75 -30 15 60
X CHORD X CHORD

Figure 30.--Concluded.

118
RELAT]UE MACH NUMBER RELAT]VE FLOW ANGLE

57.5 m

I.! 55.0

I_IIIIIIIIIIITIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
HII
I°0 52,5
-]00 X

^X ] ^L
Z Z_I Z_ZZZIz_Zz ZZZZZ ZIZIZIZZIZzIZzIzzZzIZZZ ZZIZZzZZ
0,9 CHORD 50.0

0.8 q'7.6

1 I I I I q5,0
I I i I I
0.7

]w2 -- 57.5

].| m 56.0
IIllllllllllllllllIIIIIllllIIIIIIiiiIIIIiIIiiIIII

],0 m 52.5 m
-80. X
AXIAL
ZIZZ_ZIZ _ ZZZ ZX ZZZzZZIZ _ZIIZZ_I_ZZZZI_z_Z
0,9 -- CHORD 50,0

0,8 -- q/.6

I I I I J q5.0
I I I I I
0.7

|*2 m 57.5 --

I*] m 65.0
ziIiIiZIiIIZIIIIIIIIIiiIIZIiIiIIiIiiiiIIIIZzZiiii

-- 5E.5 m
1.0
-60. X

ZzzzzzzzzZzzZZZzUx_zzZZzxzZZZZ_uzxz_z_ z AX ] AL
0.9 -- CHORD 50.0

O.B -- 'I'7.5

I I I I I _5.o I I I l I
0,7
o 20 ,o 60 so 1oo 2 22 _2 62 B2 IOE

X PitCH X P]TCH

Figure 31.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 70-percent span and near peak efficiency.

119
RELATIVE MAGH NUMBER I_EL^TIVE FLOW ANGLE

1.2-- 57.5

}.l 55.0
zIZiZ zZlllzlziiIiIIIIIIIIIIZZIIIIIIIIIIIIIIZIIZII

l.O 52.5
-erE. X

ZIZzEzZZXXZZZzZ:ZZ_ZZZZZZ:I[ZZZZIzzZZZzZXZIZZ_Zr_X zz Ill X ] _L

0.9 -- CHORD 50.0

0.8 _7o6

0,7 I 1 I I I R.5.O
I I I I I

].2 -- 57.5

].| u 66.0

iizZZzZZZZiZziIZIIIIIzIIIIIiIIII_IIIxIIi1XIiIiZi

1.0 - 52,5
- '1"0. X
z=,===,=,z=zzzzz_zZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzx=zz_zzzxz_z AXI ^l
0.9 - CHORD 50.0

0,8 - 47.6 --

0,7
I I I I I q-5,0
I I I I I

1.2 -- 57,5 -

I.] 65,0
- .iI]iiZiiIzn._

I,._XXzzz"Xx.XZzzx.xzzxzZZzzxZZZZXIIIZIIl
1.0 52,5
ZZ:I'zzzZzZZzZZS_L_zzZZzZIZZzz:zzI:zIIZzII_rIIIIZIZzZZz " _0 ° _'
AX ] AL
0.9 -- CHORO 50.0

0.8 _7.5

O.l 1 I I I I _-5.o I I I I I
20 _o 60 80 IO0 22 _'2 62 82 102
X PI]CH X P]TCH

Figure 3].--Continued.

120
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELAT|VE FLOH ANGLE

1.2 57.5 --

I.} 55,0

illIllIIIZIzx

1,0 _ iifill ZZzz


--%, zzz zzzzxz_'''r_'''x''' -]0, X .52°5 _ZzzzZZ.iIIII ZzZzzzZzzzZU

-- "%z'z_ZZZz_zzzzzzzzZZ CHORoAX
] AL 60,0
0,9

0,8 +7.6

0,7 I I I I I _5,0 I I I I I

!.2 57,5 --

l.l -- EE.O

l,O
-_ZZzziiziiiiiI IIIlzzzz_zzzzzz_zz%zz'''''zz''zx -B, I X 52. B
AXIAL
0.9 -- CHORD 50.0

O.B _t-7.6 --

0,? I I I I I I I I I I
_S,O

1.2 57,6 -

1.1
zzZZ_z 6E • 0
- lllIIi.zi

!.0 iI zzz
zzzzzzzz zx%z=='_..=.,.. 5 2 • 5
I -2.6 X -- ZZZziiZiI
I '_Zxz AXIAL [IIII IIIIzZzzZZZzzZ:zz:zzZZXi
I
0.9 CHORO 50.0

0.8 _7.5
zIzziilZZI

O.1 I l I I I _s,o I 1 I I I
0 20 '_0 60 80 100 EE _E 6E 82 102
X PIICH X PIICH

Figure 3 l.--Continued.

121
RELAT]VE MACH NUMBE_ PEL^T]VE FLOW ANGLE

1.2 -- 57.5 --

1IIII]I
I 1
Z
l.I -- 55.0
I X
I
I
z Z
Z
I.0 -- l zJ[ zz z 52.5
O.O X
W'zl Zz
iI zz ^X]AI

0.9 z CHORD 50.0


- iI z
z
I
0.8
Jz _7.5

I 1 I I I q.5.0
I I I I I
0.7

1 . 2 -- IILIIZIII 57,5 -

t Z

1.1 -- I x 66.0

iI zzzz
IIIIIiIlli]
1.0 52.5
2.5X
I ",z,

i
z
^X]/_l
ZXzz
0.9 CHORD 50.0
zz
sr I IllZZxxzZ'XzZzzxzzXIZTiiiii]
z

zz _7.5
0.8 I

0.7
I I I I I _5.0
I I I I I

52.5

1"2 F IZZz
I
IIlZz z
SO.O
]I '"",, Z_[II IZ_[IIIZI L

@ zZZZzZZZzz -AIII I

_7.5 III
] • 0 ==r..==...... ?.5 X
18z AXIAL
IZ z
z= CHORD _5.0
_ "]zit

0,8 -- _-2.5
'"'xz,,l]

o.z I I I I _0.0 I I I I
0 20 _0 60 80 100 2 22 'F2 62 82 102
X P]ICH X PIICH

Figure 31 .--Continued.

122
gEL^T]VE MACH NUMBER flEL&TIV( FLON ANGLE

].2 52.5

IlIlli
50.0

ft]....
x
1.1 tX ZZZ
IIIIZIzlZlZzxl
Xz ]I II_zz
z Iii.1
z I-,x z K
1.0 '_7.5 III
]0. X
m_ fill
a= AXIAL

0.9 === CHORD _5.0 '_III


0.8 "==ZZzzxi:[] _2.6

I I I I q O.O
I I I t
0.7

1.2 52.5

1.1 60.0

1.0 _7.5
EO, X
AXIAL
0.9 CHORD q S.0
XxZz=r'=z'r=z=,=====,,zzzZzii

0.8 q-2.6

0.7
I I I q 0.0

1.2 _F8.75

].] _6.26

I.O _3,75
30. X
IX XzZz
AXIAL
====z
0.9 CHORO _1.25

0.8

0.7 I I I I ..I
36.75

36.25
,
0 2O _'0 60 80 ZOO 2 22 q'E 62 8;3 102

X PITCH X PITCH

Figure 3 l.--Continued.

123
RELAT]UE NACH NUHEER gELkTIV[ FLON ANGLE

1.0 _2.5

0.9 _0.0

0.8 37.5
50. X
AX]AL

0.7 CHORD 35,0

0.6 32._

0.5 30.0

l,O '+2.5

0.9 _rO.O

0.8 37.5
60. X

....
tt
t] Z Zz acre = =m o= = == ==. =¢e zo ezz¢,== z:= =:z z TZ AXIAL

0.7 CHORO 35.0


=] zI

0.6 Q 32.6

0.5
I i I I 30.0
..... i

1.0 37.5

0.9 36.0
i[1 |

It
0.8 32.5
?O.X
-[I .... -. ,. AXIAL

CHORO 30.0 LIIIIIIIIIIIIII: HI']IIII''II:II?


0.7
_1 *'a== =_=== =zz =:=ZzZ z= zT'Jr T_Z'r"jr Z zI

0,6 27,5

0.5
I I I ....... I 2s.o I I I I ........ J

0 20 q'O 60 80 100 22 q2 62 82 102

X PIICH X PIICH

Figure 31.--Continued.

124
RELAIIV[ NACH NUMBER RELAT]UE FLOH ANGLE

1.0 37.5

0.9 35.0

0.8
80. X
32.5 iI
AXIAL
0.7 CHORD 30.0

lli1zIZlZziziizIIII
IIIIlll'IIllllll
0.6 27.6
I
-/I l I I I
.... j
0.5 .+ 25.0

1.0 37.5

0.9 36.0

0.8 32.5
90. X
AX]AL
0.7 CHORD 30.0
||Zz'= ...... T
[1 " "_''='= .......... z= ,|

°+1
0.5 ....
0 20 _0 60 80
T J
1 O0
27.5

25.0
0
'[IiiuzzzZzzZzZzziZzZZizT_tIIItI]/tt]
[

I
20
I
q-O
I
60
I
80
J
100

X PITCH X PITCH

Figure 3 l.--Continued.

125
gELAT]VE MkCH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE

.9 37.5 --

tII]
.8 35.0 --

t
.t 32.5
]0o x
[z e_ =z
AXIAL

,6 CHORD 30.0
,:IrliIlllLII
I]

.6 27.5 --
i zlIIIIIIIII|

.q I I I I 25,0 l I ilNl '*


"'" J,

III
,? -- 37,5

.8 m 35.0
,III

!lil

e7 -- 32.5 =111

111 x
i,i,

= • • == I lill

.6 Zz=,r==-."= ..... "" C fl 0 R 0 30,0

ql
i

illt,iii,ii*z:
%I _iiiiiliiII IIIIIIIII
.6 w 27.6

,q
1 I / I I E5,0 I I a .L

• 9 -- 38.75

,8 36.E6
I
il1
.7 33,75
_ I
121X
AXIAL
t
.6 CHORD 31.25
_......... ,. .... • ]]tIi,.=,, ....... •
x x

E8.75
Ii::iz[:iII
lllIIIlll
.5
__ z]_]

."1- I I 1 I _6.25
5O 70 90 110 130 150 50 70 90 1 I0 130 I 50

X PITCH X PITCH

Figure 31.--Continued.

I26
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER
RELAI]VE FLOW ANGLE

.8 38.75 --

.7 36.25 --

.6 33.75 --
132%
xzzzZIi
AXIAL
,5 CHORD 31.25 I
iii:nniIIIIIII111
] II]IiIiiiiiiiiiiiIIII
.q- 28,?6

.3 I I I I I 26.25 I I I I I
5O 70 90 110 130 150 50 70 90 llO 130 150
P]TCH X P|1CH

Figure 3 l.--Concluded.

127
RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE
RELATIVE NACH NUHBER

1.0 --
5!

0.9 -- Ii'z '1"3


zzJ

t
: • lr

0.8 35
I0.0 X
J
PITCH
I 27
0,7 -
J
J 1'9 iz
0.6 -
t IZ z
I
0.5
1 t 11

51 z I • mzzZ
|.0 m
• %
I'x ,, '4"3
0.9 --
• I z

Zz •
Z I
0.8 -- 35
20. X
I
PITCH
"I z
I
0.7 --
I
,t
T

I I
0.6 --
I urn: o

I i I J I I 1
0,5 ll L

_P
u
61 Be E • • •

I
I I"
0.9 m
'1-3 --
• Z

I I
ZZ

z•
• I I
35 --
0.8 --
I 30. X i
z • PITCH
z I 2;' --
I •

0.7 --
I i
u
19 --
I I
0.6 --
I "° I
I I i I 1 1
0.5 ]]
- O0 iO0 150
O0 -50 0 50 100 150 -50 0 50
X CHORO X CHOR0

Figure 32.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 80-percent span and near peak efficiency. Broken lines denote location ot
blade leading and trailing edges.

128
RELATIVE NACH NUHBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE

1.0 55 --
I -'1
• z IL_ • •

0.9 I
't7 --
k
z I
z z

0.8 I
39 --
TO. X
I
PITCH I¢

0.7 I
3] --
I
Z
0.6 • 21:
23 -
z t •
I z
48 I

0,5 I I 15 I

1°0 55 --
".1
0.9 m
_7 --
\
Zz zz "z
• z

0.8 B
39 -
50. X
P|TCH It
i
0.7 • z 3] -

0.6 "l" m z
23 --
• qkl •
I Ill I

0.5 I I I I
15

1.0 55 --
I -I I
z_ .

z
% q-7 --
\ I
ltz
I" I" I
z
• Z

0.8 -- z z
39 -
I
60. X
I
P]TCH
0.7 -- I Ii ¢ 3] - I
z I
=T •
0.6 - 23 -- I
I z i Ills'zz

0.5 I I I I I I J I
15
-300 -50 0 50 ] O0 I 50 -10O -50 0 50 100 150
X CHORD X CHORD

Figure 32.--Continued.

129
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE

leo -- 55
I z" ','J

Oe9 -- 'f?

_z z z
• Z

Iz 39
0.8 --
I
z

0.7 -- 31
• I
z
z

0.6 -- 23 • ztZ •
]z z

I l I I
0,5 15

55
,9 -
I z" =-J
z Z
I I q-7

I
I i"
I 1 I
e7 -- 39
BO. X
I • I I I x.
PITCH
I I
e6 --

I
tt m
31
I .]],
I I ,r I
23 • •tZ
x
I I I
I I 1 I I 15
I I I

• 9 -- 55 --
; . I
z

.6 - 'F7 -

39 --
90. X
PITCH
3] --

It•i•
.5 23 --
II I

I I I is I I J
O0 -50 0 50 oo 150 - 00 -50 0 50 00 150

% CHORD X CHOR0

Figure 32.--Concluded.

130
RELATIVE HACH NUMBER RELA1]VE FLOW ANGLE

.875 67.5 --

Z ZZZ_I_zzZzZZzzIz _zzZ_z _ zZXZIzZzIzzZz ZZ_ z

.800 60.0 -

.725 52.5
-BO. X
AXIAL
.650 CHORD _5.0

.576 37.6

.500 I I I I t 30.0
I I I I I

.875 67.5 --
IIIIIlIIiIIZIIIIIZIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIiIIIIIIiIzIzi

.800 60.0 --

.725 52.5
-_0. X _¢zZ_ZZZ_z_I_Z_ZIIII_I_ZzI_ZZI_

AXIAL
.650 CHORD _5.0

.675 37.5

.500 I I I I I 30.0
I I I I

.875 B
67.5 --
lXXZZlZ_I_rzzzz2ZXXlZZZiZZZZzzl_rztzIzl_iZI_II;

.800 60.0

.725 52.5
-20, X =_,=zzzzI=rm =In z ze==zz=zzzs_zzclz=zzmz=z=sczzzzz'l'=_l'===

AX]AL
.650 CHORD q'5.0

.575 37.5

.500 I l 1 I I 30.0 I I I 1 I
o 2o _o 60 eo 1oo a 2a _a 6a ea !o_
X P]TCH X P]1CH

Figure 33.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 80-percent span and near peak efficiency.

131
RELATIVE HACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE

1oO50 -- 67.5

0.975 60.0

0.900 52.5
-10. X
^X]^L
____xxzxz_xxZZZzzzxzzzzZzzzzzzzz_Z_ZZzz:x'"z'" zz=
0.825 CHORD _5.0

0.750 37.E

0.675 I 1 I I I 30.0 I I I I I

1.050 - 67.5

0.975 - 60.0

0.900 52.5
-5.0 I =zzzsarEzzxa_z_'zmms_ % _*%_*_uzz
zIzXZZZ ZZX'zzzz zzz ZZZZZZzzzz ZZZzz
r
^XI^L

0.825 CHORO 45.0

0.750 37.E

0.675
I I I I 30.0
I I 1 I I

1.050 - 67.5

60.0

0 • 97 5 - .I ]]III_Z_ZzlZz_zzzzzz

0• 9 oo - J_ =z='==z 52.5
O.OX I IIIlzzzz_z===' _=.,_. I
_'=._ =,==d =zzzz zlzZz KIIIZ I
I tt n'z azhzl] AXIAL

CHORO 45.0

0.750 37.5
0.825 [

o.675 I I I I ] 30.0 I 1 I 1 1
0 20 _0 60 80 I00 ? 22 42 62 82 102

X PITCH X PITCH

Figure 33.--Continued.

132
RELAT]VE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE

.750 37.5 --

.675 30.0

II_Ixzzzzzzz

.600 22.5 xI
Z lOB X
z_zIrIZIZI_zZ_ ZK
AX]AL
.525
-- ZZ[ CHORD 15.0

.'1-60 7.6

.375 I , I I I I I
0.0

.750 37,5 --
IT

.676 30.0

.600
8ZIzIZZIZZ_ z

22.5
J
]09 X

.... ,.=,=-
IIIE,,," AX]AL
.525 CHORD 16.0
-- zII

.q-60 7.6

.375 .... III I J 0.0 I I

.750 37.5 --

.676 m

T
I
I
.600 22.5 __ X

]]9,_ z_z_z zzI_zz

AX]AL _] |ZzzzZZzZCZ zzzr_zzz

°525 CHORD ]S.O

.'t50 7.5

.375 I I I I I I I I !
0.0
5O 70 90 llO ]30 ]50 50 70 90 110 130 150
X P]TCH X P]ICH

Figure 33.--Continued.

133
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE

.750 37.5

.675 30.0 - , tIli


.600 22,5
126 X
xZZZrZ_z=zz z v ===,.==='=z========
_XIAL

.525
_ == ]TiIz_== CHORD 15,0

'Izz_] 1
._60 7.6

I I I I I 0°0
I I I I 1
,375

.750 -- 37.5

.676 -- 30.0

- zzizillIlIIl
,600 _,======z,,nz Illzz" ............

- tiIIii%==.......-,.-==,izex a2.s
zZZxzzZZZx/i I A X ] ^L
.525

ZzzzziiiI CHORD ZS.O


,_50 - 7.5

l 1 1 I I 0,0
t I I I I
.375

• 750 -- 37.5 --

.676 30.0

,.,zzzIIIItII
=_z:zZ III
.bOO 22,5 "_¢.xz¢ zx.z Iiz1z_88zma_=_===
1_7 X
"zz'xxxxXZZZxzz - _iIlrz...r---.='-"='"" AX]AL

.525 _ _zIztlII CHORO 15.0

,_50 7.5

I 1 I I J 0,0 I I I I 1
.375
5O 70 90 110 130 150 5O 70 90 110 130 150

X PITCH X PIlCH

Figure 33.--Concluded.

134
RELATIVE EACH NUMBER RELAIIUE FLOE ANGLE

I .50 -- 70
• zI
t
,r
I °35 -- 66 u

• %

1 ,20 -- 6E --
I0.0 X
PITCH
I
I .05 -- 58 --

0.90 -- 5+ -- Z

0.75 I I 50

! .50 70 --
Z
•1

I .35
I
z I
I 66
z

• ,....
1.20 t 62 -- ]t
20. X
P)TCH
I .05 58

• • I
0.90 6+ -- • i
ii

I I I I I I
0.75 50

1.50 -- 70 -- I
I I . z I

I .35 L_ s I /. I T
z 66
• =I
.,
I "-
I
1 • EO -- 62 -- z
30. X
P]TCH

I .05 -- 58 --

0.90 -- 5or --
• I
0.75 l II l I I i so I II I I I I
-100 -55 -10 35 80 125 - O0 -55 -IO 35 eO 125

X CHORD X CHORD

Figure 34.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at lO-percent span and near stalll Broken lines denote location of blade leading
and trailing edges.

135
RELATIVE HACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE

1.50 B
70 -- • 1
I I
=
• , %-,,,,I • I
I .35 66 -
z |z

1.20 62 --
40, X
[
PITCH
! .05 58 --
z •

0.90 u
E+ --
u

0.75 I I I I I II I I
5O

1.50 7'0 - =

I
z

I .36 I
66
z -,%
1.20 62 -
flO. X
PITCH
] .05 58 --
z •

0.90 ! E4 -
• "T w

0.7'5 I I I I 5O I I

] .50 7'0 --

I
• " I

I .3E • I
66 -
x z

z
l .20 62 --
60. X
PITCH
! .05 58 --

• = Ii ? •

w
0.90 54 -- I
i u

I
0.75 I I I I 50 I II 1 I I I
O0 -55 -10 35 80 125 -lO0 -55 -10 35 80 125
X CHORD X CHORD

Figure 34.--Continued.

136
flELAIIV[ NACH NUMBER REL&T]VE FLOH ANGLE

! .50 -- 7O m

Z
• I
z

z • I
1.35 -- 66
..%
1.20 - 62
_ !
70. X

PITCH
I
1005 -- 58

Z
0
0.90 -- m
5q-
t
II I I 5O I I I
0.75

1.50 - ?0 m

1.36 _ z z 66

1.20 - 62
80. X 1
P]TCH
I I
1.05 - 58 z 8 o 8 •

Z !
Z

0.90 - ° o o 6_
I
o
t t

0.75 5O I I I J

! 050 - ?0 -- Z

I .35 - 66

I 62
1020 -
90. X
I i t
I P]TCH

I 58
I z
1005 - • Z Z ][ Z z

I z I

0090
] m 5_
I I
I • .j I I

0.75
I II I 1 ! 1 50 I IJ I I J I
O0 -55 -10 35 8O 125 O0 -55 -10 35 80 125
X CHORD X CHORD

Figure 34.--Concluded.

137
REL^IIVE MADH NUMBER RELAI]VE FLOW ANGLE

.5 72

.'T 70 D

"-IzZIZzIIIIIIIii zzlZZ
ilillIIIIIIIInzzzzz

.3 ]IIIIiiiiiilZlZZZZZzZZZZzZzzz 68 - i Iz ZZZzzzzzzzzzz
-100 X
AXIAL Zzzzzz_zzzzZ

.2 CHORD 66

,] b_

.0 I I I I I 62
I I I 1 I

,5 72

7O m

"-zzlzzznIllllli ..zzZZiZZ
iilIZIIIIIZz_zzzztxzx
"-IIi _izi_zz If'" I Izxz
,3 -- IIiiizIzIZZL" 68 -_ ilI II zzzzzzz z
-97, X IIZZZzZIZ
kX]&L

.2 CHORD 66

,! 6_

,0 I I I I I 62
I I I I I

.5 72 --

I
7O
-- IxZZiIZIiIIIIIIIIIIII]_i

zzzzzzZ z II zzzzXzZ'tzZzzzzzz ii_I IzIIIxI


.3 68
.-z_izX IIIiiizi -80, X
-- ZZzzXzZZzzzZZzzZzI_ I
^XlkL

.2 CHORO 66

.] &at

.0 I 1 I I I 62 I I 1 I I
o 20 ,o 60 so zoo o 20 _o 60 eo zoo
x pinch x pl_c.
Figure 35.--Blade to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at lO-percent span and near stall.

138
RELAT]VE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE

•5 - 72 --

IIIIIIIIl- iiiiII
-- 11 ?0
qlIii zzzz ._IIIIIIIzzz

_ IIIIi_ ZZzzzlxZZzzz
.3 _ tlIiiiiii_zzzzzzzzzZZ 68 I ZZzz
-60. X
I
IzIii
AXIAL
IZzizIiII
,2 CHORD 66

.] 6q

,0 I I I I I &2
I I I I I

•5 - ?2

zzZIZIIzIzzIIIIii
?0
• _ -- iiI II ITII
-]IIZIixii iii
IIIIIIII
'rI
.3 l_zz I'z'zzF IlllIIIill 68 -- X-xx I
-_0, X I
Zzzz z
AX]AL
.2 CHORD 66 -- Izzx'xZX.xXxxx_
x.XiI

1.1 6q"

1,0
I I I I J 62 I I I I I

]*6 -- 72 --

znZ",nzzzIIii iiiIiItZZZI
70 --

- IiiI,, ,zz IllIlllllz:,%


68 - I Zzzz
'' 'llllIIz'," -20, X
AXIAL I Zz
I I|z
CHORD 66 zz
1.2 zZZIIIZZII ZI IZzZzlI

1.1

1.0 I I I I I 62 I I I I I
20 _0 60 BO ]00 0 20 _0 60 80 100
X P ] l'CH X PIICH

Figure 35.--Continued.

139
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER _ELAIIVE FLOW ANGLE

.5 72

z:III
?0
-]iI iI

.3 68
Ill?
_ -]0. X I Z
AXIAL
q
I II
CHORD

t
.2 66 Ii

.I 6'_

.0
I I I I I b2 I I I I I

.5 i 72

-] I_ i IIIzzzzIIzznIIzzIIIzIIIIzzIIII 7O
ll]i::
Ill'ill :::'
1,3 68 j :I
-5.0 X I
A](] AL II

.2 CHORD 66
-- IZllizzzllZnztz ZZzlli_lt_rjiIzlllI

.]

,0
I I I I I 62
I I I I I

•5 - 72

_JiiIrIIIIIIIIIi.
°_ r'[,r iiiiiliiiiiiii I i. ?0

.3 lqlJ' -2.6 X
68
:; I
AXIAL
ii I
CHORD I I
.2
IIIzzzzzzI.zzzztZzZIiZIZIZlIiZIIIII

6_

6't
DO -
I I I I I 62 I I I I I
0 20 fl-O 60 80 100 0 20 _0 60 80 100

X PITCH X P]]CH

Figure 35.--Continued.

140

I
RELA1]VE MACH NUHBER gEl&liVE FLON ANGLE

.5 72 --

7O
tti
I
.3 _{if:z:'xlz_ Ill 68 I I
O.OX
AXIAL II I I

.? CHORD 66 _ II I
I ZZ Zll _ 1ZzZlZIlZ_ZZ ZIII Z 3_IlZ :rIll

.! 6_

.0 I I I 1 I 62 I I I I I

,5 72 --

t Iz.IZIIZZzIZIIzzIZZzZzzIZzZZIZZIIIFII 7O
i II

.3 68
2.6X _Ii I
AXIAl.

L
i i
.2 CHORO Ii i

IZZZZZI z-zzXZzIZZZZzzIz_zzzZZzZZZZXZ

,] 64-

1.0
I I I I I 62 -
I I I I I

1.5 ?2 --

l.q- ?0

1.3 68
6.OX
AXIAL

].2 CHORO 66
lzz x
ZZzz zzzZZZ zZ

].1 6_
ZzzzZEZ ]['J[lz:zzz z Z:l[ L-zz zz z:z

]°0 I I I I I 62 I [ I I
0 20 urO 60 80 lO0 0 20 _-0 60 80 O0

X PITCH X PIICH

Figure 35.--Continued.

141
RELATIVE MACH IqUHBEI_ QELATIVE FLOW ANGLE

.5

.3 68 -I
7.5X I

.2
AXIAL
CHORD 66 -_
I i]
t]
l]IlZzzzzzzzZLzXxzz_xzXXzzZxzzzZzX.XI ]I

°1
I
I

o0
I I I 1 I 62 I 1 1 ] I

.5 66
/]Hlll
llZZxXzzZzZzzzzzxZzz_x:zzxZzxzzzxxZ
.dF 6_

.3 62
I0. X
!
AXIAL
I
.2 CHORD 6O ]

.I 68 -I

.0 1 I I 1 I 56 I I I I I

,,5 66

6_" -IZz_'_zenznzzzzz'zz
'zzz_zI
]'In
,ZnIIITZTIITZTzIIIIIIIII
1.3
] 20.
AX I AL
X
62 - '111111
1.2 I ] CHORO 60
I T
Z I
l.l
::ll]llll]lll:
,.t I I I I I
1.0 I I i I I 56
0 20 _0 60 80 I00 0 EO fl-O 60 80 I O0
X PITCH X PITCH

Figure 35.--Continued.

142
RELATIVE MACH NUHSER RELAIIU[ FLOH ANGLE

b6 --_

,
1.3 --
]II]I]HiIIIi[ I
6q" --

I ]Iit]lltttttttzzz,q,
]*2 n
I 62 --
30. X
I AXIAL

il
I I CHORD bO -
l 1 tIIiit]iiiiiIlti]iitlt I
I I
!.0 Ii iI 58 -
llllIiiiIlli IIII

0.9 -- I I I I 1 56 ,-
i I I I

I.l_ M.
66

I e3 --'
6_

I *2 --'
[IlIll 62 lIIIz

I
$0.
AXIAL
1
lt]ii
CHORO 6O
I
I l ZZZzzzzz .,,zzZh
1,0 1
58 IIZliiiZi_Illl" l
%
Ir Z Z ZZzZ ill l.zl lllz z I_zzzI I_JiZlZ

0.9 -- I I I I I I I
56

66 --

1.3 6q-

1.2 62
50. X
AXIAL
I.! CHORO 6O lr

1.0
i '
-- "Ix..
58

zZzzzzl zz z ZZz l_
11111111111111111111111 if
0.9 ._ J I'*..... t='"" "1" -J $6 I ! i I "lJ
0 EO q-O 60 60 100 20 q'O 60 80 ! O0
X PITCH X PITCH

Figure 35.--Continued.

143
gELAIIVE FLOH ANGLE
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER

1°0

lz z

__ Ilzzz zx. zz_:. _z[izL_'='''I*'m'E=zt


0.9 58 I][iiI zZzxz=:zzII

Hi
A
IZzlzlz.ZZlzIIZlZI'
zzzzzZ=
0.8 56
60. X
AXIAL
CHORD 5'I"
0.7

0,6 62

I I I I I 5O
I I I I __1
0,5

1,0

0.9 __ZZzzZzzzzzzz_z-zzzz z z = = =zmzzw w_=z


= z : z := mz 6860I z.zzzz'rzz='===zzzzz]

0,8
70. X
5 6 H illIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIzx
AXIAL

0,7 CHORO

0,6

I I I 1 ..I 50 U I I I I __!
0,5

]°0 6O

_ zzzZZ z:zzxxz_II]
0.9 58

_ iiiIzIzzzzTtx
0,,8 56
80. X
AXIAL
CHORD 5_
]i:i::/:: :I
52

I I I I J 50 I I I I I
0.5
0 2O _-0 60 80 100 0 20 q'O 60 80 1 O0

X PIICH X P l "l'CH

Figure 35.--Continued.

r 144
REL^T]VE MACH NUMBER REL_IIVE FLOW ANGLE

I°0 60 --

0.9 58
zllZZZzZllIIlIIIlI I

IzzZxzzz Zz • zz zz zz e zl z "'==zs'°oE'Izzzzm _ •Zzl


iiI IIzI ]

i II
0,8 56
90. X iIII
AXIAL
0.7 CHORD 5_ IIII

0.6
iti Iz]
6E

0.5 I I I I I 5o I I I I
2O _0 60 80 I00 2O _0 60 8O lO0
X PITCH X P]ICH

Figure 35.--Continued.

145
gELAIlVE MACH NUMBE_ gELATIV£ FLOW ANGLE

1.2-- 60 --

1.0 B 58 --

--1 llllil
I IiII II
0.8 56 --
Izl]IIIIIllII_T_I ]
Ioo %
"]
AXI^L iii IIII
0.6 I CHORO
tII

0e_"

0.2
m

I I I 1 J
62

so
! I l
ILl',
II:

I I

].2 -- 6O

1.0 68

0.8 56
-...=II 123 X
4IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIi]IiiillliI]
I _TIIIIIIIIIIIII
^XI_L
0.6 CHORO S_

_
0.4 62

I I I I J 50 I I I I I
0,2
50 70 90 I I0 130 150 5O 70 90 110 130 150
,X P]ICH X PITCH

Figure 35.--Concluded.

146
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
|
1.35 _ I
= I0 • 67.5 = • zl
z z •

I .20 6'1".0 - L
". I,_
1.05 I I 10.0 X
60.5 - I "

I I
PITCH
0.90 o o 57.0 - I l

0.75 63.5 --
,t
I •
• zz •
I
0.60 I I i I I 50.0 I I I _z

1.35 m •
67.5 --,
z z z'l
• !
z
1 .20 m
6_.0 --

1.05 60.5 -
I =
I 20. X
I
PITCH
0.90 I II
57.0 --
• u
e
I
0.76 T . • m e° •

53.6 -- I z

I I z
1" •
z zz Z
0.60 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I
50.0

1.35 - • 67.5 --,


z
• I
Z z

I .20 - =•1 I 6q.O --


• •J

! .05 -- 60.5 - I •
30. X
I
PITCH I
0.90 -- 52.0 - I •
gm• I •
o
0.75 -- T i u •
i

I •
53.5 --
Zz z
I I Z •
Z

0.60 I I I [ J I I I I I I ="
50.0
- O0 20 80
-q'O lq'O 200 -I00 -_-0 20 80 I_-0 200
X CHORD X CHORD

Figure 36.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 20-percent span and near stall. Broken lines denote location of blade leading
and trailing edges.

147
RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER

67.5 zs
1.35 --

@Z

1.20 -- 6S.O

@
60.5
1.05 --
Z

57.0 z
0.90 --
•eg

• s •w ZZZ@
63.6
0.76 -- z-

I I 1 I i I I
50.0
0.60

m 67.5 -i Z
].35 z
I
Z

Z Z Jl
6q.O
!.20
%
Z
60.5
1.05
50. %
I
P]TCH
57.0
0.90 m B

z
i m
zZ Zz

53.6 Z
0.76

I J I I I iz'_f
0.60
I I 50.0

67.5
1.35 -- z z

sr
_m I
z
z z 6q.O
1.20 --
z

Ii
60.5
I .05 -- 60. X I
z PITCH
I z
57.0
0.90 --
-=g I
ZEmzZ z

53.5 B I
0.75 -
I
Z

I II I I •• !
0.60 I I I ,I 50.o
200 O0 -_0 20 80 I _0 20O
- ' O0 - _0 2O 80 I'+0
X CHORD
X CHORD

Figure 36.--Continued.

148
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOM ANGLE

1.35 67,5 _ .

Z
• I
1 °20
Z Z
I
6_.0 --

I ',%
1.05 60.5 -- 1
70. X
PITCH
0.90 57.0 --
e I
go I

_u I I IZl z
• i

0,,76 53.6 --
T
I Z

0.60 I I I I I I J I I
50,0

1.35 -z z 67.5 -

I
Iz I
].20 - • I
6q.O --

1.05 -- 60.5 -
80. X
Z
PIICH
0.90 - 57.0 --
u•
!
• i
i IIIIIII |
• •m

0.75 -- 53.5 -

0.60 I I I 1 50.0 I I

I,I
I .35 -- 67.5 -
Z Z
z z z k
U z
I
Z

I .20 -
:If 6_.0 -
• I

I .05 -- I , 60.5 --
90. X
I
PITCH
0.90 --
i •
Z 57.0 --

I z,,.. i

I • mm

0.75 -- I 53.5 --
I

0.60 I l 1 1 I 5o.o I I I I
- O0 -_0 20 80 1_-0 200 - O0 -_0 20 80 14F0 200
X CHORD X CHORD

Figure 36.--Concluded.

149
RELAIIVE NACH NUNfiER RELAIIVE FLOH ANGLE

.38 -- 69.0

o 67.5
3a - zzZzzZznZZzzZ
! - ,.IiiiiilIiiIiizi,
I xl "III

66.0 z zuzzzZZZz,,, zzzz


.26 ]gZiizzZzzzzzz;zzzzzzIZZIzZt llIll-80. X ZZzizzZZ
AXIAL

.2O CHORD 6or.5

63.0

I I I I I 61 .5
I I I I I
.O8

F
.30 m 69.0

_nnIzZzZZIzzIz£'
.32 67.5
- izlZZ-- aI] zZZZZZZZz. iiil
[ L[;I!
1.26 66.0
-'FO. X -- [IIxiiiz I iII
]IlZiIiiIII]]Ig lIIlz z AXIAL
IIIi _]
I .20 CHORD 6q'.5
zZlZzzzzzliiI I

l.lq" 63.0

I ,08
I I I I ] 61.5
I I I I I

1.38 69.0 -

__InIIIIZ'IlI'IIII]] lzlzil
1.32 67.5

iIIIIIzlzzzz
l .26
ii zzzzz 66.0
-20. X - lI ZZZzz
- ttlIt:tziff:n AXIAL
I
1.20 CHORO 6_.5 IIIIZrxlr.rll
- I

rXzZZ_zIZZIzzII[

I.I'F 63.0

I I I I I 6I.s I I I 1 I
! .08
ao ,o 6o 8o Ioo 2 aa _e 6a Ba fOE

X PITCH X PITCH

Figure 37.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 20-percent span and near stall.

150
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE

.38 B 69.0

IIIl_

.32 67.5
]] iiiiIIIII IIIIIIzIzIzIIIIzI lllllIz
l :II
.26 II r1 66.0
I
• 20 -- Illliiz/z' CHORO 6_.S - I
I IlllllIIIIIllIEzXZIzzx.xx.x
,iz_[I
63.0

I I I I I I I I I I
.08 61.5

• 38 -- 69.0
iizIiZZzZZIII

I
.32 -- 67.5
iiiiiiiiiiIIIIIllz - i]II:
I i÷ I
I 66.0 -I z
1.26 --] -B.O X I
iI I
AXIAL
I
- Illp ,, CHORO 6q.5 --] II
zz,
L IIIzII I£I ZI IIZIIIZZ ZZz_Z:ZzZzZZ
1.1'_ - 63.0

I I I I 61 .s I I I I I
1.oe I

m
1.38 69.0

I .32 6?.B £
. ii.iiII IIIzI ]
I
I iitl x iiizixZZiiizIiIiiiI
_I
I .26 / 1]] 0,0 X
66.0
i t
AXIAL
I
I .20 ]]]I III CHORO 6q.5
- Izi I I

IIlIllIIIIziliizr.z/z,. II
1.14 63.0 - --ZZZzz_zZ:ZzZzZZ

t I l I I J
61.5
I I I 1
I .08
2 22 _2 62 B2 102
0 20 _0 60 80 100
X PITCH % PIICH

Figure 37.--Continued.

151
RELATIVE NACH NUHBER RELHTIUE FLOH kNGI[

.80 I =*'Zzzz zZZ.Z zzZZZ z zZ Zz z zZZz XZ'z zz zxz"z z ZZZ:ZZ Z z 55.0


Z

53.5

iiiiiIiZiiZiiII
IIIIIIIzIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

.68 52.0
IO0 X
II
AXIAL
II
.62 CHORD 50.5

.56 _9.0

,,50 I I 1 I I _7.5 I I I I I

m
.775 55.0 B

Z TY Z ZI Z:]CZZZ ]rj z zc.xTX Z ]rl[ z

.716
Z 63.6
] I
.655 I _ IIIIIIiI
52.0
12] X
I
^X]HL
.595 CHORD 50.5

.536 m
q'9.0

._75
I I z I I I I 1 I I I
_7.5

.8O 55.0 --
zz:zzzzzzzZZ zzzzZ z_ zZzz.z
IZZZZzzzzzz:zzzzzzzzz
Z

[ I 53.5

zzt
t]]
.68 52.0
1_1X I htII
-IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIKIIII II_III
AX]AL
.62 CHORD 50.5

.56 '_9.0

.5O I I I I I I I I I I
'+7.5
5O 70 90 llO ] 30 I 50 5O 70 90 l 10 130 ] 50
X PI]CH X PIICH

Figure 37.--Continued.

152
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE /LOW ANGLE

.8O 55.0 -
ZZ][ZZZzzzZZZZzzZZZTZZIz z [ZZZZzZIzZZzIIZZZI

z I
53,5
z I

zXI
m
.68 52.0
]6] X l]]ili:li: :uzilnzz:
AXIAL II:IIllIIllllIIlllzllIll
m
.62 CHORD 50,5

.56 _9.0

,5O I I I I I $7.5
I I I I J

.BO ._IIZzZ_IIZzzZZZAZALII zz 55.0 --


Z IZIZzzZZz_[zzZzzZZI
Z

z I
.7_ -- 53.6 --

.68 52.0
]81X
AXIAL _Izmzzz:ZZZ:I:fl:EIIIIII]:[IIIIEEIN:IlZz:::
.62 CHORO 50.5

.56 ¢'9.0 --

.5O I I I I I 'F7.5
I I I I I

• 90 -- 55.0 --

.8_ 63.5

izZI[iizzzzIIZzzIIIIZzI

.78 --
l
z
iII Ixz:zzxzxIIIzzII
52.0
::tltl
20] X
I I
ziiI AXIAL I II]IIiziiz:::lii]
I
.72 CHORO 50.5 _IEIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
II

,66 _9.0

.bO I I I I I _z.s I I I I I
50 70 90 llO 130 150 50 70 90 I lO 130 150
X PITCH X PITCH

Figure 37.--Concluded.

153
RELAT]VE NACH NUMBER RELA1]VE FLOH ANGLE

I .35 65.0 --
• • Z
z
,, I_. "z I
t
i .20 61.5 --

/
].05 m
58.0 --
I
I
I 0.0 X iI
P]ICH
0.90 _ I 'I 5_.5 --

_
I
I
]
0.76 51.0 --
I I Illzz
0.60
I I 1 I I q7.5 I 1 I

! .35 65.0 z
•I "I

1.20 • T 61 .6

1.05 58.0 --
I
20. X I
D
P]ICH I
0.90 5q.5 --

0.75 ZSI
51.0 --
z z

I I II I II
0.60 I _7.5 I I I _Z
I I

I .35 -- 65,0 - z
Z |

• z[

z zJ
] .20 --xz 61.6 -
%

1.05 -- 5B.0 --
30. X Z

P]TCH
*'o °
0.90 -- 5_.5 --

• ml 'n •E
0.75 -- 51.0 -- •Z

I
xz I Ix z

I I I I 1 I I I I I I I zlz
0.60 '_7.5
-I00 -_0 20 80 I'eO 200 OO -_o ao so ]'_.o aDO
X CHORD X CHORD

Figure 38.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 30-percent span and near stall. Broken lines denote location of blade leading
and trailing edges.

154
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE

1.35 65.0 -t •
• " I
I
z

I .20 z ZZ
" I
-ix 61.5 --
'r.
]o05 58.0 --
I
I •
0.90 wwI
5'e.5 --
I
w

n o
I .
0.75 T ° -
51.0 -- l
l I z•j I III

0.60 i i I J 47.5 I I I I I I z zj z

!.35 65.0 --_

I .20 -_z 61.6 -


l

1.05 58.0 --
60. X
PIICH
0.90 54.5 --

_u

0°75 T w m lm I •
51.0 -- Z z

I I I
IZ I
0,60 I I I 1 I 47.5 J I I Zlz

I °35 - 65.0 lilt

j
!.20 -zz • 61.6 %

I
1.05 - 58.0
60. X
PITCH
Z
0.90 -- 54.5
w m

m
Z
m.
i

0.75 -- T • • ibm ii•


51.0 -- i •Z

I
I iI z
0.60 I I I I J I 47.5 I I I I I zp
-I00 -`t0 20 80 140 200 - I O0 -40 20 80 1 'tO 200
X CHORO ,¢ CHORO

Figure 38.--Continued.

155
REL&]IVE FLON &NGLE
RELAIIVE HACH NUHBER

65.0
1.35 --
• .,P = I
• I
! .2o -# 61.5

1.05 -- 58.0
70. X
Z

PIICH
g 5_.5
0.90 --
z •
_u
• z z
• l= •
0.76 -- 61.0

I I I I I q7.5
I I
0.60

65.0
1.35 -
• -4.
I[
I
• I
1.20 61.5
Z

I, z

58.0
1.05 --
80. X I
Z PITCH
5q.5
0.90 --
• =, El •

Z I

0.76 --
T • ill z z
61.0
Z
I
I Z[
I I I I I q7.5
I I I ;
0.60

65.0 z
1.35 --
M I
I1=
I
z •

I I • I
61.5
] .20 - Z

k | I
58.0
1.05 -- 90. X ii
PITCH
I I I
5_.5
0.90 -- I
I I i I
I == .'1 • i
=
z•
51.0
I I tIz''
0.75 --
I I I

I I I I I 1 I _7.5 I t I I zz z Ili
0.60 20 80 1_o 20o
-_0 20 80 l _0 200 O0 -qo
-]00
X CHORO % CHORO

Figure 38.--Concluded.

156
REL&TIVE HACH NUMBE_ RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE

66.5

].3 65.0
-_IIIIIIIIIIIzIIIIIIIIIIIiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii]iiIIIIII

],2 63 I 5
IIZIIIzIIzIIIIIzIzIIIIIIIzIzzIIIIIIzIZZZIIIIZI - I O0 ,I_
---ILl

AXIAL

].I -- CHORD 62.0

].O 60.6

J I I I I 59.0 I I I I I
0,9

66,5

1.3 66.0
-- iiiiiiiiIiIiZziZiiIiiii
I
iiiiiiIIIIIIII IIIIIIiiiIi
IZIZZIIZZIIIZIIIII 63 • 5
1.2 "IIIzzzIzzIIIIzZZXIzIIxZzZzXlXZI -80. I

^X]^L

1.1 _ CHORD 62.0

I.O 60.6

I I I I I 59.0 I I I I I
0,9

66.5

1.3 65.0
IiillllllillIllllllIIllIIIIIziiiiiIiriiiiIiiiiilI

__,.ZZIIzIIIIZzIIT,
1,2 ._iIzIZIzziiZiIiIiiiIIiiIIIILZ*_ "'ZIzz 63.5
-76. X
AXIAL

l.I CHORD 62.0

1,0 60.5

0,9 I I I 1 I 59.0 I I I I I
20 _0 60 80 100 20 _0 60 80 100

X PIICH X PITCH

Figure 39.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 30-percent span and near stall.

157
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELAIIVE FLOW ANGLE

66.5 --

].3 m 65.0
iIzzIi I i]iIl IlIIIEIIzIIlIzI
IzzZZIzzzz z
ZZZIZ ZZz 1
ZI z I _ ZZZzzzzzzzzZIZIIItIIIl
1.2 -- Z IZzZZ EZ IIIT.I U ZZZ Z:Z fiZZ I 63.5
-60. X
AXIAL
].] CHORO 62.0

].0 60.6

0.9 I I I I I 59,0 I I I I I

].=F 66.5 -

1.3 66.0

IIItIIlIIIllzIIIIIIIIII .I
__ iizziZZIZZZI IZIZI IzIZZZZZzZZIzIiI
1.2 63.5
ZiiZlZzzzIII ZIII -- IZxii I iI] I1
-40, ,¥
AXIAL IzIzIzzzxiZIII
1.1 CHORD 62.0

1.0 60.6

0.9 I I I I I 59.0 I I I I I

66.5 --

1.3 65.0

xzZzZzztZZzzzztZIZli" . iZiZ zzzzzzzzzzzzz


m
1.2
-20. X
63.5 _ i_IIIIIIIIIIIIzzzz.
iIlIIlizzIaI
AXIAL iI "ZZZzz
I.! CHORD 62.0 - I
xXXZXlZZZZzxzzzz I I/ix

1.0 60.5

0._ I I I I I 5_,.o I I I I I
0 2O _'0 60 BO [DO 20 '_0 60 80 l O0

X PI1CH X PIICH

Figure 39.--Continued.

158
RELAT]V[ NACH NUMBER RELATIUE FLOH ANGLE

l.i- 66.5 --

1.3 65.0
JZz z zcZZ_ZZZZZz zzzZ z¢z ¢zzzz ¢zZ

11 ZZ z
I
1.2
-- I iI 63.5 _ iIIIIzl
-]0. X T] Iz
IIiiiIiIIx AX ] AL I II
l.I I zl
CHORD 62,0
iI z_h,u ,
ZIZI I Z IZZIZZZIZZzCZZZ z
1.0 60.6 i

0,9 I l I l l 59,0 J I I I ;

1.'t 66.5 --

1,3 n
66.0 --

zzzXZZzzZzIZzzZ XI_Zzz zzzz2zzzzz zzZ_z z

z vIll_
1.2 - z
I 63.5
I I
-5.] X - it III
AXIAL
I.] _ ltlIIZZZ
CHORD 62.0 -- II

I I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIz_IIIIIIIIIIIIIII_[I
I.O 60.5 m

0,9 I I I I l l l i I
59.0

1,'1- 66,5 --

1.3 66.0 m

z
ij[ zzZ z zzZZ zz z zz zzzZZl¢z zzzzz zZSZzzzz Z
IIz
z z
1.2 - I 63,5
i I -2.6 X -I II
I
_IiIII;
AXIAL I
l.I CHORD 62.0

IIzzZzzzzzzzz,..z,.,_.zzzzzlzz_,_,zzzzzzili
1.0 60.5 i

0,9 I I I I I 59.0 I I I I I
0 2O _0 60 80 100 0 20 '_0 60 80 l O0
X P]TCH X P] I'CH

Figure 39.--Continued.

159
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE

66.5

1.3 65.0
-- zzz_[ xzz zz zzz Zzzz z zzzz z zz z_zzzz zl XL'ZZz Z I
1Z Z
1.2 --
I
I
I O,OX
63.5 I] ]
tI z I
I3] Ax z^L
CHORD 62.0
l.I -- Iz ]

IIzzzzzzzzzzZzzzz_nzzZZJ z ][
zzz z zz z_.__r..zZI
1.0 60,6

i I I I I I 59.o I I I I I
0.9

],e t -- 66,5

1.3 66.0

-- EzZZXZzZZZZZEzZzzZZZzzZ_zZZZZIZZZZZZz
IZ Z

].2 63.5
2.6 X

AXIAL I
_ II CHORO 62.0
1.1

1,0 60.5

O,q
I I I I J 59,0

|g_. -- 62.0

-zzz,'-,zzz,.,.,,,_, • HI
!.3 60.5
_ zzzZZ IczZZ_[Z_Z zz zZ zZlzz ZzZ zZz zz zz zzzI[z Z
- --z ,,.,,z,_,z,,z,,zz_[]]tt
Z 59.0
1.2
5,0 X
Z
AXIAL

I CHORO 57,5
1.1

IIll
1,0 56,0

I I I l J 5_.5 I I I I J
0.9 0 20 q'O bO BO I O0
2O _O bO 80 ] O0
% P] l'CH X PllCH

Figure 39.--Continued.

160
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELAT]VE FLOH ANGLE

1.4 62.0 --

]ZZZzzzzzZX
1.3 -- rx =zzz• zlxZzZZr_t •

ttI
zzZZZ z • zxrZZ_XXZZxz
bO. 5 -- zz=zzzzzZZZzZZzZzzzZZZzzZZi I

1.2
l 59.0
_ _ttt
7.5X
AXIAL
].1 CHORO 57.5

z,IIIiiI
l.O 56.0 --

0.9 I I I I I 5_.5 I I I I I

1.4 62.0 --

1.3
, HI
zzzzzLZzZZZZZZzzzXz_zzzzZ2zZZZzzz
60.6
* "*' *, _r,,,t ,HI
z

1.2 Z 59.0
IO. X
z AXIAL
1.] CHORO 57.5

I.O 66.0

0.9 I I I I I I I 1 /I
5q,5

I.q 62.0 --

1.3 60.5
_]_zZZXZzzzzzZZz_Zzzzz

l¢ ][zzzzzzzxzzzzzz:ZXXZxzz
1.2 l¢ 59.0
20. X
X AXIAL
z'
1.I CHORO 57.5

- ='",,iz,,,tttlt]]t]t
]
1.0

0.9 I I I
zhzzzzz,zzt]

1
I
I
56.0

5'f.5 I I I I '
0 20 '_0 60 80 IO0 0 20 =tO 60 gO l O0
X PI1CH Jr PITCH

Figure 39.--Continued.

161
REL^I]VE MACH NUMBER _ELATIVE FLOW ANGLE

7"
1 °35 58.25
TTIII]II]T I

] .25 I 56.75 It]] ]IIII]IG, .


I
IIIIiI
1.15 I 55.25
30. X
I
AXIAL
I
x
1 .05 CHORD 53.75
lllIlllTIiiiIIii!

0.96
==

L8 = zszzzeZzz= z:x=z zZI i_


i]] 62.26

I I I _l 50.75
I I I I I
0,85

1.2

I.I 66.0

1.0
xx
=l AXIAL
q-O• X 5q'. 5 ITIIZIzziiziiiiIZziziIiizIIiiii

0.9
CHORD 53,0 4, I

0.8 61.6 _'

0,7 I I I I ..I 5o.o -.. I I I I

1.2 m 55.0

I.I -- 59.5

I,O -- hz 52,0 -
50. X
AXIAL

0.9 -- CHORD 50.5 --

0.8 -- I _9.0 --

O.l ....
I I I I .I '+7.5 I I I I ..I
0 20 _0 60 80 I00 0 20 q-O 60 80 O0

X PIICH P]TCH

Figure 39.--Continued.

162
RELAI|V[ MACH NUMBER IqELATIV[ FLOW ANGLE

].2 55.0 --

1.! 53.5 --

].0

0,9
+
] fix=

m=
%
.++
60.
AXIAL
,t"
52.0 --

IIizztzHZtlijliiiiillllIIlIlllIIIIIII]I

CHORO 50.5 --
J %%1 === %

0.8 '_9.0 --

'I
0.7 I I I I ._I _7.5 I I I I

1,0 55.0 -

IZ]l

0.9 63.6 -
=mlllqllll1==I¢ll I% = %

,r= w'=ma =1=


_iIIIIIIIlIII.
0,8 52.0 -
70. X

0.7
',I AXIAL

CHORD 50.5 -
iiiiiTiiiIililiIliiIIII;IU |

0.6 ¢'9,0 -

0.5 I I I I +.I =FI,5 I I I I I

].0 55,0 -

0.9 -- ]ZZ= G3.5 -

-- I_lzl_ st I um= fl _ s _1_111% m.il m.w nl_ll m

0.8 m
80.
AX I AL
X
52,0 --
t ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,t]i
0.7 CHORD 50.5
=I

0.6 q-9.0
[iiiiiiii IIIIIII1

0.5 I I 1 I q7.5 I I I 1 J
0 20 qO 60 80 O0 0 20 qO 60 80 ] O0
X PITCH X PITCH

Figure 39.--Continued.

163
RELAIIVE MACH NUMBER RELAIIVE FLOW ANGLE

Io0-- 52.5

_ "IIIIIIIllIIIlllI]
0.9 51 .0

_ lliiIllIllIIIlll
Im|mm tm u&s I i I _. tl z w| mvm n |meeomme
0,8 '+9.5
90. X
AXIAL
CHORD 48.0 -- iilllIIIII
0,7
a Z

0.6 t$6. 5 --

.... I I I q S,0 ....


I I I I
0,5
8O O0 0 20 _0 60 80 iO
0 2O d+O 6O
x PITCH X PITCH

Figure 39.--Continued.

164
_ELAT]UE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE

1.0 52.5 --

]iliiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIZI]]
0.9 5] .0 --

0.8 iIiiiiI]IIIIIIII
_?.5
-_ =1=== -I!!1 Ii ._=_=i

ixz= ==''*'.'= ..... I00 X


AXIAL iI
0,7 m
CHORD _8,0 iI

0.6 _6.6
-- eZI

II i I
0.5 I I I I I I I
'(-5.0

1,0 52.5 -

0.9 61 .0

0.8
I 18 X
ZZZl=ZlZlZZlll=r.z z z================= A X ] kt
Iz
zllZ z
0.7 CHORD '1-8.0
• ]
8Zlt
0.6 _6.6

0.5 I I I I I '+5.0 I I I I I

].0 52.5

0.9 51.0

i ill
0.8 _9,5
138X
411111111111111111111111
{[]i]Illll
IIIII
III
zZZZZz_IZZ_I_Zzz_I zz zzzzzzzz='=zzzzzzz= A X IA L
0.7 CHORD 48.0 m

=I
z Z

0.6 _6.5

0.5 I I I I I es.o 1 I I I I
5O 70 90 110 130 150 5O 70 90 1 ]0 130 I 50
X PITCH ,t' PITCH

Figure 39.--Continued.

165
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER I:;'ELAIIVE FLOW ANGLE

I.O-- 52.5

0.9 51 .0

0.8 --
{67X
_9.5 - , [.]IIiIIIIIIIIIi,
I
ZZZIZXI_IZ'ZlIII'ZZlIKZZZ z ZI lzlzI'zIIzlzzIIIIz _ X ] PtL tIItiiillIiilitlt]itlil_ _1:
0.7 _ I CHORD f18.O
Zzzl I

0o6 -- '16.6

I 1 I I I _5.o { I I 1 I
0.5

leo - 52.5

0.9 -- 61.0

0.8 --
166 X
_?,5 - ll]]:iii::::I:
zzzzzzzZzzzZZzZ:Zzzzxzzx z z zxr'zzzzzzz:zszzzzz AX ] AL ]IllIII]l:iliiiii]lllll
I
0.7 _ ZXziiXI CHORD _f8. O

0.6 -- *+6.5

I I I I I _s.o I I I I I
0.5

leo m 52.5

0.9 51 .O

0.8 q9.5
xzzzzzzzzzxzXZZlzZzZxz x zzZ#SZzzZZz=zxx:xz { 76 X
z AXIAL

0.7 ZZ zz CHORD _fS.O _I:l:.l:::l:iiiiilllill{l


I]
-- iiiI

0.6 _6.5

I I I I I '+5.o I I I I I
0,5
50 70 90 110 130 150 50 70 90 1 lO 130 150
X PITCH X PITCH

Figure 39.--Continued.

166
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER @ELA]]VE FLOW ANGLE

1.0 52.5 --

0.9 51 .0

- _i]ii
1
0.8 -- tfg.5
195X
zI'IzI_ILzI:[ZIZXzZIIXIz

Zzz z _
lzzZZZZzxzzzzxzZ A X J AL
_tiIttttittIltttt]]ttI
lit I]It_It_t_
0.7 -- ZZxzzZ CHORO I+8, 0

0.6 q'6.6

0,,5 I I I I I q-5.0 I 1 I I I

].0 52,5 --

0.9 61 .0

- .IIItL
0.8 -- R.9.5
206 X
zzzzzlzzzZZzzzlzZzZzzlzl zl zzlxlz'zzzllzzz ^X!AL - I_ 'fill
I] I
0.7 zzZZxzXI CHORO q'8 • 0 _iiiliii]iiiiiiIiillllll
I 11llIIIll

0.6 _6.6

0.5 I I I I I _5.o I J J I J
50 70 90 ] I0 130 150 50 70 90 llO 130 150
X P]'ICH X PITCH

Figure 39.--Concluded.

167
RELAllVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE

] .35 63.25 . == =
i •

,r" 59,75 --
i .20

z •
i t =Z _,=,•

1.05
I I0.0
PITCH
X
56.25 -
]
_ I z 52.75 -
0,90
I
I
z I
I
I
0o76 _ I = I _9.25 - I
B I
I
I
0.60 I I I I • 5.7s I I

z
I °35 z 63.25 -- • z=
I= zZl

! .20 z
.l,- 59.76 --
J
zl 1%,

1.05
I 56,25 --
I I
20. X
I
PITCH

0.90
I 52.75 --
I z
z
m •

0.76
I • 9.26 --
m I
I
I
1 I I J +s.?s I I
0,60

-- z z
I .35 - 63.25 I
I
=, • •1
1.20 -- 69.75

• I %.
I

1.05 -- 56.25
30. X
PITCH

0.90 -- 52.75

X
I I
Z
0.75 -- _-9.25

0.60 I I 't-5.75 i I I I
-I00 -50 0 50 O0 150 O0 -50 0 50 O0 150

X CHORD ,,_CHORD

Figure 40.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 40-percent span and near stall. Broken lines denote location of blade leadi,
and trailing edges.

168
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE

1.35 63.Z5 -- "= z


¢
¢zl

1,20
I
59.75 --

z z z
z x
%
m
-- z
1.05 56.25 --
_0. X

m PITCH
0.90 52.75 -
m

I :1¢ I' •

0.76 _9.25 - I
I

0.60 I 45.75
I I I

1.35 63.25 -- • • = • z
I
I .20 59.75 --
,I
z

• z
%
Z
1.05 56.25 --
z GO. X
PITCH
m z
0.90 52.75 --
m
m z
m z lr Z
m

0.76 • m 49.25 -- I
I

0.60 I 45.75 I

1.35 63.25 -- " • • z

I z

I .20 D z 59.76

z • z
-%
1.05 56.25
60. X

z PITCH
0.90 52.75

m
0.75 49.25 I
I

0.60 I J 45.75 I 1 I I I
O0 -50 O 50 100 150 O0 -50 0 5O 100 150
X CHORD X CHORD

Figure 40.--Continued.

169
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE fLON ANGLE
6
1.35 -- 63.25 m • •
z-
I z I
1
1.20 -- 59.75
z iz
u Kz 3'
Jz 56.25 I
1,05 --
70, X
J, I
PIICH
J Zo 52.75
0.90 --
z
I - o z

0.75 --
j m
q9.25 I
I
J

0.60 J J I q5.75

! .35 -- 63.25 -- " =-


I z , I
I
] .20 -- 59.76 --
" k
Z
I I
I .05 -- 56.25 --
OO. X it
PITCH
I
]
0.90 -- 52.75 -- i.
I I
n x
z
0.75 -- I _9.26 --
I I
I t
I

0,60 I I I I I _5.75
I I I

1,35 -- 63.25 -- • • z z
I I

"4 • j
1.20 -- 69.76 --
""_z

!.05 --

ii 90, X
PITCH
56.25 --
i
I

'[1
0.90 -- 52./5 --

, t,I
I

I
z
z
I
0.75 -- • 9.25 -
I

0.60 1 I l I _s.75 1 I I
- O0 -50 O" 50 oo 150 00 -50 o 50 IOO 150
X CHORD X CHORD

Figure 40.--Concluded.

170
RELATIVE NACH NUHBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE

! .25 6_-

LII.IIIItIHIIIIIIIIIIHIIIHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
1
I,20 63 -- I • I

1.15 62
-00, X

IIIIII_III_IIIIIIIIIIIIIHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII2[III AXIAL
.10 -- CHORD 61

.06 6o

.00 I I I I I 59 I I I I I

,25 6_

I_II,llllllllllllIIl
- -I
.2O 63 L_ ltlIil ill _

- I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIi
.15
_ iiiiI
62 _ IIIIIIIiiiiitIitIIr_
-40, X
AXIkL
°I0 _IIiiillllIilll lI CHORD 61
llIiill

.O6 60

.00 i I I I i 59 I I i I I

.25 6T --

.20 63 --
IZZlllllil ill
lllll_I1_z_I
iilIIIIIIIlll
.15 _ III II 62 m
iI_ lilt
I
-20. X
I iii
I AXIAL
CHORD
II
.10 61
- I1 ill
I - IIll tz
I
_ IiiiIIII
.05 6O
IIIii

.OO I 1 J I I s_ I 1 I I
ao ,o 60 eo !oo 2 22 ,a 6a oa I02
X PIICH X PllCH

Figure 41.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 40-percent span and near stall.

171
RELAIIVE NACH HUMBER RELAIIVE FLOW ANGLE

1.25 - 63
iiiIlIIIIIIlllIi
iI Ill
I llilI'IIti
I .20 - 62
l
] IIZll I

61
_ I It
1.15 iiI tI -I0, X
t :
I AXIAL

1.10 -- CHORD 6O
I it

1.06 -- 69 tt hzzzanzzzz:izl:llll
I
::z::iIlIl f lt Izz
I I I I I 58
i I I 1 l
.00

,25

]iiIIIIIIIIIIlIIIIIIIiilliiiii
.2O m

I III
I
_ tt
o15 t -6,1X ft][[tI]tI]5
lI t AXIkL
CHORD
.I0

:] :
.06
s,_ t ZzzlzIzIzzIIznZzIqZIIIllItlllttI]
1.00 . I I I I I se I I I I

1.275 61.5
I

I .226 60.6

] tlizZZZZZnzIZnznzzzzzz_IIIlIiiiiii

59.5
1.175
-t ] 0.0 X
t AXIAL - l::zz:zzzz:mn:zzzmzzzziiilllllllIll]
1 ,125 CHORO 58.5

1.075 57.5

I I I I I s6.s I I I I I
1.025
20 qO 60 BO I00 22 _2 62 82 102

X PIlCH X PllCH

Figure 41 .--Continued.

172
RELATIVE HAOH NUMBER RELAI]VE FLOW ANGLE

.85

,,8O __ iiIiZIIIIIIIIlllIIII 51.5 --


I I 52.5 -- ]I

I
.;'5 50,5
!16 X
AXIAL
.70 CHORD _9.5

.66

.6O 1 1 1 1 l
45.6

• z.5
111
--

I I I J

,85 52.5
iiziiiIiiIzIIIZZIIIZIII

.80 _ I Iiiizizz,tz_rIZZzZZZI 6! .5

I
.75

,ii 133
AXIAL
X
50.5
IIIII IlIIIiII
ilIIIlIIlllllllll]iiillI
.7O

.66 _8.6
CHORO _9.5 f

.60 I I I I I _7.5
I I I I I

.85 B
52.5

zzZzzzzzznZzzZznZrZZz
z
.80 61.6
-- I T] IIiIZzzZzzzZzZZZZ

.75
IIII
I 160 X
50,5

AXIAL
.7O CHORD _9.5

.(,5 't8o5

.b0 I I I I I ,,7.5 I I I I I
50 lO 90 I10 130 150 50 tO 90 ! !0 130 150
X PIICH X P] TCH

Figure 41 .--Concluded.

173
RELAT|VE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE

62.5 m

I •
I
r-. 57,5 m
1,2 - ,%=
I
. i
i.O -- 52.5
]0.0 X
PITCH

0.8
I - q-7.5
I
m
• II
0.6
I
I
I _2,6
t
I I L I ='" } J
0.'t- 37.5

1ell. --
62.5
I ,'1

1.2 --
£.. 67.6
,!
mR,

J
P u
• zI
!.0 52.5
20. %
"t
PITCH
I q'7.5
0.8 -- D

I
t ]
0.6 - X
q.2.6
I I
I I I I • I 1
0.aP 37.5

62.5 u

I .= . •t

1.2 --
¢ 57.5
=l
m
'1" t

].0 -- 52.5

0.8 --
q'7.5 z

0.6 -- q2.5 • = t
I = t"
| z

1 I I I 37.5 I I " I J
0.'t
00 -50 O 50 IO0 150 - O0 -50 0 50 I00 150

X CHORD X CHORD

Figure 42.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 50-percent span and near stall. Broken lines denote location of blade leadin
and trailing edges.

174
RELATIVE NACH NUHBER RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE

62,5 --
I : " ,I

].2 m
..,,.'. .I
57.5 -
.I".
i •
1.0 52,5 -
I "
_0. X
I
P]TCH z

0.8 '1"7.5 --
I
I *
0.6 I _u, _ w _ u
_2,6 -- I x Z • I
z
z z •
I I
0,4 I I I I I
37.5

].q. m
62,5 --
I

|e2 B
-t",
w 67.S -

• m m

I.O -- 52,5 -
50, X
i
PITCH
u
,B z
0.8 - • u _l-/. S --
z

u
• Z
0.6 -- q'2.6 -- I Z • Z
z
I z

0,_ I I I 3;,.s I I

|.q-
62.5 -
I

1.2 --
E/.E -

].0 - ,11 I"


iii 52.5 --
I 60, X
P]TCH
0.8 - I
° • o _7.5 -- z

I z
u
• u
l z
j o u •
0.6 -- • 2.5 -- z Z I I Z Z Z
z
I - I
0,_- I I I I 37.5 I I I
- 00 -50 0 50 O0 150 DO -50 0 5O lO0 ]50
X CHORD ,1[' CHORD

Figure 42.--Continued.

175
RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE
RELAT]VE HACH NUHBER

62.5
|oer --

I - I
I
57,5
1.2 --

II 52°5
].0 -- Z
70. X
I"
PIICH
I _7 • 5 t.
0.6 --
I I
• i z I
II
i I • I
I _2.6 z
0,,6 m z
I
I I I I I
37,,5
O.Or

m
62,5
I,,_" m

I I

I I
57.5
1.2 --
",j
i 52.5
1.0 xt
C
=,,I
=f7.S I
0.8 - I • X ,=, •
I
I
m •
iI I I
I _ e,w
'F2.5 I
0.6 - I
I
I 1 I 37.5
O.=F

62.5
|°mf B
I I

I I
57.5
1.2 --
"1 3
52,5
1.0 -

I
'_7,5
0.8 --
I I

I _2.5
0.6 t,
I Ii I I I I I I i I

I I I I I I I I I
37.5
O.=F O0 -50 O 50 lO0 150
-tOO -50 0 50 lOO 150
X CHORO
X CHORD

Figure 42.--Concluded.

176
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER
RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
].2--
68 --

1.]
61- B

Z ZZZ]L.Z_z Z ZZ ZZ ZZZZZ ZZZZZzZZZZZ TT zZz ZZZZZZZZzz ZZZZ z


mzmlwn_azu Im wmn_DzzZ_Zz Z=zCz Z Zz ZZz zz IEZ z Zzlr_ z ZlZaEI
].0
60
-80. X
AXIAL
0.9 CHORD 56

52

I I I I I I I I I I
'1"8

].2 --
68 --

I.I
64"
-- ZZ ][:z z Z:zzzZZZ Z][zzzzZzcZzZzz_[Z][Z

zzZZZ zzzz ZZZzzzzzzz


].0
6O __zzzzzZ zZz Xz Zz z ZZzZ z Zzzz zzz I:ZZZz ZZzZzzzzzzZzz zZ I:zZ
-'TO. X
AXIAL
0.9
CHORD 56

52

I I I I I
1.e - J I I I J

1.2 --
68 --

] . | -- ZZZ, x"_zx'Zz_:zz_z'ZxXzX:ZZZxzz
61. --
Z Z
Z

x z zx
].0
6 0 - zzzx'xx'xz_z:":zzx=
-- ZZE ZZZz Z ]._r TxzZZ Z':[ -]0. X
Zz
AXIAL
0.9
CHORO 56 ...,v'" Zzzzll_,_ **_llzzmssmfz z

0.e -
52 --

0.7 - I I I I J 1.8 - I I I I
0 I
ao 1.o 60 eo 1oo o ao 1.o 60 eo IO0
X PITCH X PITCH

Figure 43.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach humor and flow angle at 50-_rcent span and near stall.

177
RELAIIVE FLOW ANGLE
RELAI]VE HACH NUMBER

68
1.25
zzzIIZzIIZIzzIZ

xzx z II
Iz I 6_
1.15
iI I;
I z
I z
I .05 - iI zi 60 - iiIIIZzzzr.,,
I -S,O X
zz _XI_L
II C.oRO 56 I I Izzr'_I_zzzz:zzI:I[IIzz_zIIZ:ZIzzzzzZZ

0.95
zzII zxz x

52
0.86

I I I I I
I I I I I _8
0.75

68
1.25 -- zIzZZII.IZIIII/II

zz I'ZZi z
zzZ Z
6q"
I .15 ]I z Zz
I
] zz
1.05 -- Z

zI
]I o.o ^X ] AL
6O
iii]
_ "" zZ '_z z:: :zz n _ s zz z'zzzz zxz zz" IIlI I
Izzii I CHORO 56
0.95

62
0.85

I I 1 1 q-e I I I I .I
0.75 100
100 _0 20 '_0 60 80
0 20 _FO 60 8O
X PI1CH
X PIICH

Figure 43.--Continued.

178
RELATIVE NACH NUHSER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE

1.0 --

0.9 q-q

_lzZZllZl Ilzlilll
0.8 qO -zzlzzzzzIIiIIIlIII]III]]' t z Zrz
I00 X
_XIAL
0.7 CHORD 36

zZ_zzzZzzzzzZzlzZzzz wz icz •

0.6 _ zzzz 32
-- tt] z..,.,......,..,,_.,,. ' "

0.5 I I I I I 28 I I I I I

1.0 m
q-8

0.9 q-q- iz_zzZzZZZl_zzZzZZlZlzl


I]I

iiilzl zllllllllllll
0.8 q-O
119 X
AXIAL
0.7 B CHORD 36

z z:zzz_Z zZz zZ CZZZZzZZZZlz z ] e_zrZ=S j'm=zzz_a


0.6 32

0,,5 28 I I I I I

1,,0 't8 --

0.9 Z Ill II"III I]]I


,t,_ zzzzzzzzzz , I TI ] .-
Ii_ ] zZZZ._zz.,zzz

0.8
129 X
- , II

AXIAL
0.7 CHORO 36
z zz z xz Zz z xzzZ Z ZX Z_[ Z ZZT'x Z

zz z._zzjzzsz=z'zz
0.6 I ix z= 32

ZliI
0.5 I I I I I _e I I I I I
50 70 90 II0 130 150 50 70 90 110 130 150
X PITCH I PITCH

Figure 43.--Continued.

179
RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE
RELATIVE HACH NUMBER

1.0 -- _8

0.9 --
-zzzzn_dznzzzIIiIIIIlgl
IIIlll]zzzr_Zanz
IIII
0.8 -- q-O
I$8 X

AXIAL

CHORD
0.7 --

Z_zZZzzzzZzZzzzZZ_r XEZZ"£ZZZZzzz I ilzzZZZZZzx_zz

0•6 -- rlli

I I I I I I I I I
0.5 I 28

1.0 D
q-8

0.9 -- 't-¢- zz zIzlII I


--ZzzZZZzZZzZNiTlZZiiIIiII 11 ] Izn z zn,r"z

0.8 q-0
159 X

AXIAL

0.? 36

z_,_zzZ_zzZzxzzzZzZ_zzzzz_iiizzz_ZZZ_x CHORD

0.6 32

I I I I l I I I I I
0.5 28
70 90 i IO 130 ] 50 5O 70 90 110 130 150
5O
X P] "[CH
X PITCH

Figure 43.--Concluded.

180
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER
RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
1=_" --

6?
I
u xm u

|e2 --
56
_ " '_1
I ,%

1.0 - I "
5O
• m • • ) 10.0 X
PITCH t z
0.6 - J z Z

J ,,= z
I z
0.,6 - I I I
I i u
• B
•m
38
z ]
z

O.'T I II I 11 I I II
32 L

|Dot
62
° • w /
I
1.2 k. 66
u
I
I
I
1.0 - • " z_ i

5O I
• "• .'1 20, X
Q
PITCH
I
0.8 - I o
't-'1- ]I II
I I
0.6 - I
38 • z [
I I= z

o._ I II I "11 I
I I I

62
I
=° •J

Io2 --
F
66

1.0 - !

u m o
° 5O
•1 30. X
PITCH
0.8 - I "

z tI
0.6 -- I -.1 Z Z
zZlI
I J e • = •Z

O._F 1 II I I I !
DD -t5 I0 65 32 I I I I I
12D 175
-IDO -=1.5 lO 65 12D 175
X CHORD
X CHORD

Figure 44.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 60-percent span and near stall. Broken lines denote location of blade leading
and trailing edges.

181
RELATIVE FLObl ANGLE
RELAT]VE HACH NUHBER

62
]._
xe K Iw J
I
'1
I, 56 i. m
i.2 I',.
J.
. "1; I -
5O
1.0 q0. X I
PITCH
I
I w _r
0.8
I
u I
_w
g I
I 38 I
0.6 m
B Z I " I
I
I 1 I II l I I .]
O.er
I II 32

62 --
].4" B

I
• Im, zZ ..I
'I
I 56 --
1.2 --

1.0 --
. "1" 50 - z

50. X D
• u _ g
P]TCH
1 ". q-4. --
0.8 --
z
I " zzK Z z •
Z
• I
I 38 --
0.6 -- • m •
I
I ]
I II I 1 1 32 I
0._

62

I
• •s n - I

I E6
1.2
"r.
I
m • u
r 5O
1.0 60. X
• o ° I-
m PIICH
I-°
0.8
I - I • z z
z

i I ]
i X z I
I

0.6 g -. 38
I I
I
II I I I J
I [I I I 1 32 175
0._ O0 -q-5 IO 65 120
-_5 10 65 120 175
O0
X CHORD
X CHOR0

Figure 44 --Continued

182
RELATIUE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE

I.q- m 62
I Bz u • J

I .d
1.2 -- 56
.,,I
1.0 -- m
"L 50
I"
Z

I. I
I',,. I
0,8 -- 99
I - I • Z x
o

I ". 38
I X_ Z X •
z
z
7
0.6 -- _ _ _ _g ° m Z
om
I I I I
I II I I I I I I1 I I I I
0,+ 3E

|.9 m 62 -- u
u
I
I ,I
1.2 -- 56 -
I
Z
1.O -- • m z 50 -- I
l, 80. X
I, t
PllCH
0,8 -- I q-9 -- Z

I • zZ
I
x_Z z z x z
0.6 -- I m m •• •_ 38 - Z l

I I
I II I I I I 3E I I I I I
0.9

1°9 B 6E
I z • • I
I E6
1.2 --

I 'i

50
I
I.O --
90, X

t
m

PITCH
I
0.8 - 99
I I
II x
Z

0.6 --
I • • e • 0o 38 I t" z I

I I
I II .I _" I I 32
I II ..I 1 I
0.9 l-O 65
-I00 -_s Io 65 120 175 00 -_5 120 175
X CHORD _' CHORD

Figure 44.--Concluded.

183
RELATIVE HACH NUHBER _ELAT]VE FLOH ANGLE

1.0 65 --
Z1"zzxzzz ¢]cz "Y zz xzzz Ll"z
• z zz:zzz x zzzzz ZzzZ i X_Z.,ZzZ:Zzz Zx

0.9 62

Z_[zz z z_[ZZ zZZZzz zZzzZZZzZ_r-z][x ZIzzz zr.z zZ ZTZ _zzZz z

0.8 59
-BO. ,1[
AXIhL
0.7 CHORD 56

0.6 53

0.5 I I I I I 5O
I I I 1 I

1.2 65 -

I.I 62 B

z ][:Z ZZ Z ZZ Z ZZ Z:Z Z Z_Z Z lr_r Z Z ZZ Z ][Z Z ZZ ZZZ _L,ZZ:Z Z Z:z Z2 Z :I_:Z:Z

!.0 59
zzx_ZZzzzZ_Z_ZZ_z_zzz -_0. X
z_zzZzZZzZ_x_ _Zzz
_X]AL
0.9 -- CHORD 56

0.8 63

0.7 I I I I I 5O I I I 1 I

1.2 65 --

].1 D
62 m

zz'ZZZZxzzz zz.zzzZZ:zz
__ ZZ Z ZZ
1.0 59 Tz zz x,ZZZZz:zZxz x'zzzx z'zzxz z:zzX'zX'Xzz::zx..z
Z Z
-20. X
xx.zx zzZZ z xZZZzZ:xzxzrzz
ZZzz_zzZzzzzl_ AXIAL
0.9 CHORQ 56

0.8 53

0.7 I I I I I 50 ] I I ] I
ao _0 60 eo zoo e aa _a 6a ea 102

X P]TCH X PITCH

Figure 45.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flo_ angle at 60-_rcent span and near s_ll.

184
RELATIVE NACH NUHBER RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE

].E -- 65 --

].] 62
- zxzzzz=,_,,,,,,,z
zZ Z zz z
Z •
Z Z -- zzzXZzz/ZXzzz:zr "Zz,,z
].0 59
-- Z Zz
-]0o X iZ 2Z ZZz

^X]AL
ZZZzzzzxxxxzxzxzxzZZ zzzZ z,,
0.9 CHORD 56 -- ZZZzzzzzzzZZZZZ

0.8 53

0.7 I I I I I 50 I I I I I

].2 65 --

1.1 _ _zzzzzzzZZzzz 62
zzZZ zzz_ ZZzz

Z •
Z zz
1.0 -- Z 59 - ./HI.
Z ZZ -5. ] X
I
zI.zz AX ] *4L -I III "IZZzz z
..zzliZlI llll CHORD
0.9 56

El ZzzzxzzzzzzzxXZXzz.. ZZzzzZZ/Tlii

0.8 63

0,7 I I I I I 5O
I I I I I

K
1.2 (,5

1.1 62
f ,zz_ZzrZzzzzzzZz
_ iz;zz zZZZZZz
1.0 59
-2.6 X
lllliIl
I ZZZz
IIIIHHI AXIAL
ttll]ItlIz,,zzz,,,,z,,,z,,,,,,_,,,nzzzr, zizzzz
I
0.9 CHORD 56

0.8 53

0.7 I I I I J 50 1 I I 1 I
0 EO _0 60 80 I00 2 22 q'2 62 B2 I02
X PITCH X PITCH

Figure 45.--Continued.

185
RELAT]_E HACH NUHBER RELA]IYE FLOH ANGLE

_2

- I
,,6 39
--xZ:[zZ'ZzZZzZZZzzzZZZZ z

.5 36
-- Iz]
100 X

_-
AXIAL
CHORO 33

.3 3O

27
I I ] l/ I J
.2

,? vr8.5

_6.5

_2,5
112 X I

AXIAL iiiiIIlIIl_i
CHORD 39.5 iiiIIIH
fill 1

36.6

I I I I I 33.5
I I
.2

.7

.6 --ZzzzZZZzzZZzZZZ_zZZzZZ_z z
,, _
q'8 -- 11]I
-- z'z" x itiIzx zzzxr'zr'zx

.5 ,_s - ]
'it] 1 125X I

AX]AL I
.ur CHORD q-2 --

zzzzI11lllllllllIllllIlill
.3 39 --

.2 I I I I I 36 J I I
5O ?0 90 110 13O I 50 50 70 90 I I0 130 150

X PIICH X PITCH

Figure 45.--Continued.

186
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER gELAIIVE FLON AMGLE

.9 51 --

.8 IF6

.7 '1"5
]_0 X
AXIAL
.6 _8_ZZZZ zz_z_Izz ZZzz z CHORD '1"2 - it

.6 _ z_I?_Z_"'_"
39

I I I I I 36
J i , , I, j

.9 51 --

.8 IF8 --

.7 IF5 --
161X
AXIAL

.6 CHORD
--_ I1 z II ILIIS Z Zli,l ZZZ ZI[ Z lZ ZI Z ZZ ZZ Ill,l[ i[

Z zzZzz

.6 _ zzZzzzW_

I I I I I s6 I I I I I I[IIIlZZll
.4

.9 5] --

.8 _8

.7 IF5 m
16q'X
AXIAL
.6 '('2
,xzz-_zzx'_'=zz=zz'zzx=z zz zZZXZzZXllllllllllZZZZ x CHORD

.5 39

.IF I I I I I 36
1 1 1 1 1
50 70 90 1 lO 130 150 50 70 90 llO 130 150
X PIICH X PITCH

Figure 45.--Concluded,

187
RELATIVE HACH NUHBER RELAI|U£ FLDH ANGLE

1.25 60 -

It
I L,.
1.10 53 --
I
I I

0.95
!
q6 --
IO.O X
P]_CH

39 -
I
I z
I 32 --
I

0.50 I II 1 25 I II

1.25 -- 60 -
z

1.10 --
t 63 -
T
•=

0.95 -- • 6 -
20. X
• • u* = ZI
PIICH
0.80 --
I 39 -
I
J
o

0.66 - I 3E -
I
o m Z

0.50 I II I I 25
I I i 4w J I

! .25 - 60 --
• i _ Ii1= II

I.lO -
I
53 -
1
,s IF
%

0.95 -
I" _6 -
30. X
PITCH

0.80 -
I - 39 - z

I
°°
0.65 -- 32 -
I Z

0.50 I II i I" I 25 I I
OO -55 -I0 35 80 125 OO -55 -10 35 80 125
% CHORD X CHORD

Figure 46.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 70-percent span and near stall. Broken lines denote location of blade leading
and trailing edges,

188
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE

I .25 60 --
I • u m • i: [

t "I
l.IO 53 --
-I r-.
0.95 _ r'. q6 --
I
TO, X
• m ue I i I
PITCH
0.80 _ I 39 --
I
w
I I
w

0.65 _ I u _
32 -- I
I lr

m •

0.50 I II I 25 I II I

I .25 60 -
I o q .I
1.10
I J
53 -
4 r-.
0.95
I-
't-6 -
I,

0.80
io
39 -
I u

0.66 I 32 - z
I
I z z

0.50 II i _5 I I I I I

I .25 60 --
I

1.10
I
53 -

0.95 q6 --
I"
• C 60. X
I •
PITCH
I- I .
39 --
I . I
I I
• m 32 --
z I
I I I

0.50 I II I "l-i j 25 I I1 I [ I I
-100 -55 -10 35 80 125 -IO0 -55 -IO 35 80 I 25
X CHORD X CHORD

Figure 46.--Continued.

189
RELklIVE NACH NUNBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE

I .25 60 --
I

1.10
I
53 -
I

0.95 ,.,I I-
_6 --
70. X
: • T= I •
PIICH
0.80 39 --
I z

i" I z

• w

0.66
I u
32 -- I •
z
I[

_r I
I I I

0.50 II "I. 25 I II I 1 I

I .05 60 --
I .. . t
z

0.90 m
I
53 --
I

0.75
I i=
q-6 --
-I I 80. X I'I
P]TCH
0.60 - I ,st, 99 --
I
• f I
• Z

O.q-5 "1 32 --
I 11" I

I I I

0.30 ! I 25
I II I I

I .05 - 60 -
I

0.90 - 63 -

Ii
0.75 -
Iz
_6 -

0.60 -- 39 -

O.'f5 -- 32 --

0.30 I I I .... I I 25 I II I .... 1.1 I


-lOO -55 -10 35 8O 125 - O0 -55 -lO :95 80 125

X CHORD .¢ CHORD

Figure 46.--Concluded.

190
RELATIVE HACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE

].? 66.5 --

].i 63.0

1.0 -- 59.5
-]00 X
][Z][ZZZ:I[ZzZ ZZ ZZZ ZZ Z ZI[ZZ ][ZZ EZZzZi[ZZZ I[ZzZZZZz_z_q
AX]AL
0.9 -- CHORD 56.0
Z zZX_ zzz_tzzzz_z _zxz zz_zZz_Z_| _z_Z

0,8 52.5

0.7 I I I I I q9.0 I I I I I

1.2 66.5 --

1.] 63.0

l.O - 59.5
-80. Jr
AX]AL [][ZZZz:z Z_ Z ]CZ zZz Z:Z Z:Z Z ZZ zZZ ZZ£ZZ ZlZZ zZ][ Z]iZZ3 ZZZZzzZ

0.9 -- CHORO 66.0


ZZ Z z zZ z:Z zzz I_ Zz'z zZZ Z_ZZ X ZZ_[ zZ z Z x Z2Z ZlZ2 z zz Zz z Z_ZZ Z

0,8 62.6

0.7 I I I I I 49.0 I I I I I

1.2 66.5 --

].] 63.0

I.O -- 59.5 n

-60. X
AXIAL Z3[Z_ ZZZ ZZ Z ZZ ZZzZ:Z ZZZZZ Z_ Z ZZZ2 ZZZ zZZ I_ZZzz:I[ zZZ _ _

0.9 - CHORD 56.0


wZZ_ZZ_Z_ZZZ_zzZZzZZz_zlZ_ZzZX_

0.8 52.5

0.? I I ! I I ,,.9.0 I I I I I
0 20 ,¢-0 60 eo zDO 2 22 _z 62 ez zoz
x PZ'rCH X P]'IC.
Figure 47.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 70-percent span and near stall.

191
RELA1]VE HACH NUNBER RELAT|VE FLOH ANGLE

]*2 m
66.5

],! -- 63,0

1,,0 -- 59,5 m

-H.. X
AX]^L ZZ Z:Z z zz ]r.z z ¢z ]_z I[l[zz:xZzzz:z:zzz Z'_zzZZ_[z I_rzz z Z]zZZ_

0,9 CHORD 56,0


--_rZzzzI_ZZZZZZzZzZIZZ IczzzZZZZ_ZZZZI_ [zz zzzz'z z z'z_zl

0.8 62,,6

I I I I .I J I I I J
0,7 _t9.0

]*2
66,5

1.1 -- 63.0

1,0 -- 59.5
-q'O. ,I[
AX]AL zzz2 z Z_ ZZ z:I:z Zl[ zZ:ZZZzZZZzz ZZ ][z zZz ZZ Z Z,Z Z_ Z ZZtzzzzZ'J[

0.9 ._=zx=.=zzz=z=zzj:ZzxxzZZ,,Z====zzZzzzzz=z==r.=x===z=.== CHORD 56 • 0

0.8 -- 52.6

I I I I J ,_9,o 1 I I I J
0.7

1.2 66,5

!.1

].0

0.9
E .ZXxzz=ztx== z.,zZZZzz zzzzz=:zzzz
-20.

kCHORD
X| k L
X
63.0

59.5

$6.0
Z].ZZZZZzzzzZZzZZZZZZZZzzzZ_ZZZZZZZZZZzZzzZZZzz2_

ZZ zzzzz Z zz Z:Z z zz ZZZZZ

0.8 52.5

I I I I J _9.o I I I I I,
0.7 t02
o 20 _o 60 so 1oo 2 22 _2 62 82

X PITCH X PIICH

Figure 47,--Continued.

192
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE

1.2 66.5 --

1.1 63.0 --

zzzZzzz3zlz
1.0 - zz ZZz 5 9,5

z Xzzz - ] O, X
z z zZ z z Z z Z Z"x Z ZZ ][ZZ z..,xzz x X.,z
0.9 zzlZ zz Ax ] AL z-zx z zz
ZZ_zzz CHORD 56.0 zz Z
I[¢ZZZ:IzZzTZZZZ
ZZZzzzzzZZzZZZZZZ

0.8 52.5

0,? I I I I I qg.o I I I I I

],2 66.5 --

I.! 63.0

zzZZZZzZzXz, zz
Z
1,0 Z ZZZZZ 59.5 D
-5.1X
Z •
Z z AXIAL _zzIIIZlZZZzzz
0.9 CHORD 56.0 m Z
zz zz
|Z Zzzzzz_rZzzz x zz Zz
zXZxZ ZII
_ZlZz ZjZ zz
0°8 zZzzzzZXZZXlll J,
62.6

0,7 I I I I I I I I I I
q'9,0

1,2 66.5 -

1.I 63.0
ZZZIzTIrzZZzI[
I •

I
].0 m
59,5
iz -2.6 X itllIz ,
ZZZz AXIAL
Z
0°9 CHORD 56.0
Zzlr
illII _x",%z" _zzzzZ
_
IZZzz_zlZlZZZZZllZIZ
0.8 52.5

0,? • I I I I I ,_9.o I I I I I
2O q'O 60 80 !00 2 22 42 62 82 102
X P]TCH X PITCH

Figure 47.--Continued.

/
193
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE

1.2 66.5

iiIIZIIi
Z
I
I,] Z 63.0
zZZ z
II

Zzzzz
x 59.5
1,0 I! 0,0 X
Z AXIAL

0,9 tI •z
CHORD 56.0

0.8 62.6

I I I I ] _9,0
I I I i J
0.7

1,2 m 59.5

_ ilZaZZzzzz
Iol 66.0

fizz IIZZzzzlzx_ z_'IIzzIIIII I]


1.0 ZZxll z

zz 2.5 X
52.5 "* _iziiiIIIII]
II
AXIAL

0.9

zz_Izz_iiIi|
t] CHORO q.9.0

0.8 _6.5

I I I I q2.0
I I I I ' I
O.t

1.25 59.5

iiIIllzz

1.15 56.0

l .05 52.5
B.O X
AXIAL
_ zz88_llnsLzzzz
0.95 CHORD _9.0

Zzzl

0.85 -- Z q5.5 --

zzILIlt
I I I I .I _2.o I I I I
0.75
20 q'O 60 80 O0 2 22 _2 62 82

X PITCH X PIICH

Figure47.--Continued.

]94
RELATIVE HACH MUNBER RELAT]VE FLON ANGLE
_Z
1,2 2 59.5
z

z
!.] 56.0 1-
z

].0 52.5 L Iz%zx

0.9 "z z
I[ z
zz AXIcHORDT.AL
6 .1[ °r9,0 ,,_,._z_..x.xz_z:XZXzzrzlxzZZZIl[ '
l z z
m
0,8 45.5

0.7 I I ..I I I I I ._ I
42.0

I.I 59.5 --

I.O 56.0 --

0,9 52.5 --
Zl[ lO. X
% AXIAL
==
0.8 I z CHORD 49.0 -
Iii
II I

"=%%Zdl]
0.7 45.5 -

0,6 I I I I
42.0

],1 59.5

l.O 66.0

0.9 52.5
20. X
- AXIAL
0.8 -- mm CHORD 49.0
mmim

0*7 --
45.5

0.6 ---
I I I J ....... J
42.0
0 20 q'o 60 80 l O0 22 42 62 82 ! 02
X PIICH X PIICH

Figure 47.--Continued.

195
RELAT]V[ HACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE

q R.0 --

].0 -- qS. 5 -

0*9 -- q2,0 - [ZZzzzzzZ:ZzcI


33, X
zz
AX] &L
SzzZzZzZzzzZzZZ]
CHORO 38.5

36.0 -
0"7110.8 lz..,. "''"'.. .... . ._..,zt

0.6 I I I '1 ......... J 31.5 --


I I I .... I......... J

q'9.0 -

1.0 -- _6.6 -

0.9 -- _2.0 -
_O, X
AXIAL

0.8 -- CHORD 38.5 --

0.7 -- I'-,,--.......
.....---..,.... .]]I] 36,0 -

I I I I 31.5
I I I I ..... J
0.6 .....
....
_9.0 --
].| --

_.0 -- q'G.G --

0.? -- 42.0 -
50. X
AXl AL

0.8 -- CHORD 38.5 --

0.7 --
Z ¢zz

I
z'zzs asrlz=,,

I''"''T ..... ?"] ..... j


° t ,_.
t1
- ...... J

0.6 -o 20 qO 60 80 I00 2 22 q2 62 82 l 02

X PITCH X P]TCH

Figure 47,--Continued.

196
RELAT]VE MACH NUMBER RELfiIIVE FLON ANGLE

.8

.7 38.5
35.0 I
l_Zl:zzlzl_ ae m a_m =zajlzw_zZ m_ Z.jI_z _

J
.6 -- Z Z 3].5
60. X
Z IIIIIIZIzzL_r_ZZIIlII IIIIIITIITTII]
AXIAL
.5
,] CHORO 28.0

.q. m
2_.6

.3 I I I J ....... )
21.0 ! I I I I ........ J

.8 38.5 --

.7 36.0 -

.6 3].5 -
70. X _iiiiIiiliiiiI IIIIIIIIIIlIII|
Z ZZZzzzzZzzzzzzzz_zlZZzZllzsszz _
AXIAL
.5 CHORD 28.0 - ]iiI IIu

.q.
*t 2_.5 -

.3 ._. I I I I I 2i.o I I I I ....... j

.8 38.5 --

.7 35.0

,6 3].5
co. x - iiiiIIt]Iii ]
]z_Uw_ltmlzzslzzzzzzzzZlzzzzzzZzzz
AXIAL
Z
.5 CHORD 28.0
z
-I ,z'zzzzzzzzzzz] Ill

.4 24.5
lz'='='"_rZ I

.3 I I | I , .... ! 21 .o I I I I| ...... I
0 20 _0 60 80 I00 2 22 q2 62 82 ! 02
X PIICH X P| I'CH

Figure 47.--Continued.

197
RELATIVE FLOM ANGLE
RELAT]VE MACH NUMBER

38.5
,8

.7 35.0

.6 31.5
90. X
AXIAL
CHORD 28.0
.5
_]Z== _' "_ %0_ Rz s z_s ZZZzZ L.ZIZzZz Z zZZZz zm

2_.6

I I I I .... J 21.0
.3 0 20 q'O 60 BO 1 O0
"0 2O _0 bO 80 ]00
X PI1CH
X PIICH

Figure 47.--Continued.

198
RELAT]VE HACH NUHBER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE

• G -- _O.E5

w7 -- 36.75

.6 33.25
]OOX
zzzZzzX-zxxlzlzZlr, z
i_ z"=zt'zzzzzx_z ^ X ] AL
CHORD 29.75
]iZIIllllllllllllll
II
.5 -- Z

8]
rlllIlllll
.q. -- 26.25
[ilZZZzzP
I I , I I I I i I I
.3 22.75

i,]1
• 8 - _0.25

.7

.6 33.25
|IOX
AXIAL

.5 CHORD 29.75

.4
/I
,xl

I I I I I •I I I
.3
50 70 90 ]]0 130 70 90 ]0 ]30 ]50

X PITCH X PITCH

Figure 47.--Concluded.

199
RELATgVE HACH NUMBER RELAIIVE FLOW ANGLE

g °05 -- 65
I

0.90 -- 55
i
• x qK
O.75 --
.,z _ I_
lO.O X
I •
PITCH
I
0.60 -- 35

I I It
I ]
0._6 --
I
E6
i I
I I
l II I I I I 15
I I1 I
0.30 1

! .05 -- 60 m

t • • qw
."I
0.90 --
I'. 6O

qz m
r'.
O.75 -- _0
t
m
I
I
0.60 -- 3O

t 'It
I

O.q-6 -- 2O
_ I
I o m

0.30 I II I I I !o I II I I I

! .o5 - b0 --
I • i= q_
.J
•--

k t-
0.90 -- 60 -
= %

0.75 -- q-o --
30. X
m PITCH

0.60 30 -

m
"°qz

0 o '1-5 20 - i
I o m _ B mm

0.30
I II I I I 1 g0
I II I I 1 I
00 -55 -I0 35 80 125 00 -55 -go :35 80 125

X CHOR0 X CHORD

Figure 48.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 80-percent span and near stall. Broken lines denote location of blade leading

and trailing edges.

2OO
RELATIVE MACH NUHBER RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE

! .05 60 --
I ..I
B • •

0.90
"t
50 --
,r
• w j •
0.75 '1-0 --
+0. X
I °"
w P]ICH
0.60
I 30 -- i

f o
9

0._6 I 1 20 -
I I

0.30 I fl I I I I 10
I II I f I I

I .05 60 --
I I
• =r q= - w w

0.90 ,J 50 --
"T
=: =l¢ • j==
0.75 m q'O -
50, X
P]ICH

0.60
I u •

30 -
I o

O.q'E f 20 - m
• w
I i w m

0.30 I If I I I0 I II I i I

I .05 -- 60 --
I I
• • w

0.90 --
I "4
50 - ===

I-
0.75 -- _0 --
60. X Z
I" .
PIfCH
J ° •
0.60 -- 30 --
I
z

0._'5 -- I 20 --
I • w w

0.30 I II l I I I 1o I II 1 I i I
O0 -55 -10 35 8O 125 -IO0 -55 -I0 35 80 125
X CHORD X CHORD

Figure 48.--Continued.

201
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELAllVE FLOM ANGLE

! .05 60 --
I I
g

0,90
I
50 -
I

I,
• Ir

0.75
tk
40 - "l
I",I
_ I "
0.60 = • 30 -
I w _qb
Z

Z
Z

0.46 _ I 20 - = I

0.30 I II I I
I0

1.05 60 -
I I

0.90
I
60 -
.I
• Ic

0,75 B
40 -
BO. X I
P]TCH
0.60 I 30 --
I
'I
I • • e%
I I
I z
0.4E
I 20 -- I I I
I I

0.30
I II I I 10 I1 1 I I I

1.05 - 60 --

B_

0.90 - BO --

=
b w
%
0.75 -- 40 -
90. X
PITCH
0.60 -- 30 --

0.45 -- 20
=

0.30 I I 1 I I 1o I II I.... I I I
-lO0 -55 -10 35 80 125 O0 -55 -10 35 8O 125
X CHORD X CHORD

Figure 48.--Concluded.

202
RELATIQE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOM ANGLE

I .02 60 --

0.96 57 t

ZZZzXZZZZZzZZZZZzzZXZZZzZzZZz z ZZZ=[ZzZzZX :Z][: zz_[zz


0.90 54
-eO, X
AXIAL
O.8T m CHORD 51

Z s'lZr Z zZZZz ZZZzZzZ ZZ ZZZ Z zZ T'/Z zZZZzZ_[Zzz ZZ ZZZZz zZ l


0.78 48

0.72 I I I i I 45
I I I I J

1.02 60 --

0.96 67 m

I,_ZZIIIZIIIZZ'n'IIIIIIZZIIIIIIIITL ii Zz.rzzzZZzZZZI ]1
0.90 5_
-_0, X
AXIAL
0.84 CHORD 51

lZZzzlrZziIZZZZIZIIn'ZZIn'IZII]ZIZ_n'zZzZziTzZI z

0.78 48

0.72 I I I I I 45
I I I I I

1.02 60 -

0.96 67 m

EzZ ZZ Z Z:Z zZ Zz:zZ][zZZ Z][ |ZX.


Z.ZZ-ZZ zZZz XZ_[ ]c,T=rzZZZ "IzZZzZ
0.90 54
-20. X
AXIAL
O.8'F CHORD 51

0.78 _8

0.72 _5 I 1 I I I
0 20 _FO 60 80 l O0 2 22 42 62 82 102

X PITCH X PIICH

Figure 49.--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 80-percent span and near stall.

203
RELATIVE MACH NUM8ER RELATIVE FLON ANGLE

1.02 -- 6O I

0.96 51

zliilzlZlllZIIIIIIllZlzlZxZrT
0.90 5'1-
- dISz -I0. X ¢zl IzzZZZzZzZzzzzzzZ

AXIAL
ilzz_ Zzz
O.8q CHORO 51
-- iiiI Zzzz

z IlII ZzzzzzzZzz
0,78 _ zzzzlIIzlII I '1.8

0.72
1 1 I 1 1 'F5 I I I I I

1 • 02 -- 6O

E1 -- iiIIlli
O. 96 -- illll
I
I II ziIIII ZZZzxzzzi
I
0.90 -- 5_ -- ZZ
I II -6.0 X IZz zz I
I
iI AXIAL III'IIIIIIIIIIZIIIZI

O. 8_ -- I CHORD 51 m
I ZZZzz Z
II
ZZzz
_8
0 o 78 III--IIIII z_[lzzr4[l

0.72 I I I I I q-5
1 I 1 I I

6O

_xl iiI ItI


] .02 -- iII_Ill
I
Ix
0.96 - I IZ 57
l
l
l

0.90 -- I ZI 54
t I
I
z
O.OX

AX ] AL
I CHORO 5]
0.8't- H i -_ Zzzz;zZ,zzzzzzi_zzzczzzz,.,zzzZ..ziZiI]
]
I
z_
II z _8
II

0.70 !
0.72 I 1 't5
I I 1 I J
0 20 'tO 60 80 _00 22 _2 62 82 102
X PITCH X PITCH

Figure 49 --Continued

204
RELATIVE NACH NUHBER RELAT]VE FLON ANGLE

.5+ 27 --

.+8 2_ --
"X zz z ¢z Zz Izz ZZZz_[ zZZZ_ _zz-zzZZzZzzz

• +2 21 -
zl 100 X
AXIAL
.36 CHORO 18
I
zzz xz.zzzlr'xzII ]_[IlI III
.3O 16
]_ixzzZZZ zzxz

.2+ I I ..+1 I I 12 I 1 I I

.5+ 27 --

.+6 "'_""=z_'=z_zzzzzzz ITZ_ """"""

• +2 _
ill
II:
109 X
AXIAL
2, -
21 -- it
.36 CHORO ze - . ..Zzl"ZIZZII]

,,30

I 6 -- I]IZj zzzzzzzxz
.2+ I I f z2 I I

2,_ lit
1
.5+

rtr
.q-8 24 -- ]
==:='"x=xzXXXzZZzZ:xZXZ'rtr z t ]][zZXXZ=.,=z"==

_ Zlll
.+2 21 -- t
119 X
AXIAL
• 36 -- CHORD

.30 --

15 --

.2+ i I l I I 12 --
50 70 90 110 130 150 50 70 90 110 130 150
X PITCH X PITCH

Figure 491--Continued.

205
RELAT|VE NACH NUHBER RELAT|VE FLOH ANGLE

.54 27

i t tt!
zz:xx =zx:xx_zzz_z'xz_xZi I

.8"8 25"

.5-2 21
126 X
AXIAL
CHORD zzzzzzozZz_III IIIIIIItlII
.36 18

.3O

.25- I I I I I
15

12
- I ! I
11 J

.55" 30
xx:zzz:xzxZz:zxZxxzNZxaIIZiii

.5"8 1 27

.5"2
|28
AX]AL
X
25-
_t_
III
.36 CHORD 21
zniiixziziiII_[III]_]I

.3O 18

I I I I I
.25" I I I I I 1s
5O 20 90 110 130 150 50 70 90 l!0 I 30 1 50

X PI1CH X PITCH

Figure 49.--Concluded.

206
RELAI|VE NACH NUHBER
RELATIVE FLON ANGLE
• 925 --
I
.825 - I 53- . "" " "l[
_3 --
I
• 725=- • 33 -
|0o0 X
I I
PITCN
"1 zzZI I I
• 625 - I
23 -
I I
I
.626 I
"1= I 13 -- !
I
._95 I _
iIlII
3 I II
I

.95 -
5q',5 -
I
ml i l_ •

.86 - I.
=1"1".6 - ,,,,,
f'

°75 - I
3q-o5 --
20. X
PITCH
• 65 --
2q'.5 -
I
• 66 - I z
14.5 -
I z

II I I "'1" '1-.5 J IJ I "1 =T'


x •

.95 --
I 54 • -- • • i= • ,z=L
,mr

.86 - I -=
=1-4
I,
°75 - B • 34
• • ,z I 30. X
PITCH
• 65 -- I .
2'1-
I
• 55 - I
141
.
I
•m
I II I I I
75 -35 5 q'5
I I "1 I _ -f"
85 125 ;'5 -35 5 q-5 1_5 J95
X CHORD
,t' CHORD

Figure 50.--Streamwise distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 90-percent span and near stall. Broken lines denote location of blade leading
and trailing edges.

207
RELATIVE FLOg &NGLE
RELATIVE NACH NUHBER

.95 5'i- I i

I °i

.85
l
"1'
',1 3'T
.75
''1%
I=

I 2_
.65
I
I l'l"
.66 • w

I u _m

I I- _.at
II
.'t5

5=1. -- z
• 95 --
I • g u • ==1

I i',
q.q. --
.86 --
"1
z z

I. 3_" --
,75 - I
60, X !

z z • Iz
P]]CH
2_ -
.65 -
I g
I=

I lot --
• 56 -
g
I e

m wmm

i I I ,,. I I" I-'f"


.or5
I II

54 m
• 95 --
I • el • Imm _

%
I I'
q-or
.85 --
I I"
I
3q" --
.75 - Z
60, X
g • rot
I •
& P]TCH
I 2_
I
.65 --
I =
I
Z •
I
lq"
• 55 --
I I o
• I!

I II I 1 II I J" i-'1"
,'t-5 75 -35 5 '_5 85 125
-75 -35 5 '_5 85 125
X CHORD
X CHORO

Figure 50.--Continued.

208
RELATIVE NACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOH ANGLE

,95 54 --
I • "" • °%1.

,85 --
I Iz
't'q" -- z
I

,75 -- ..I 34 --
70. X
PITCH
• 65 --
Ix
25 --
I
z z

°66 -- I z
14 --
I w

lem,

,45 I II I I II I I" I "'1"

°8 5q- --

,7" q-4 --
q
,6 3'1" --
80. X
PITCH
,S u mo 24 --

°'t. 14 --

,3 . . ] . i I I I I I" I " "1"

.8
- ,1 54 -
• m u u

..q
o7 • • " ;I q-4

,6 3_
90. X
PITCH
,5
,,. 24

,4 14

,3 I I I 4 I I .... I. I
75 -35 5 45 85 125 75 -35 5 45 85 125
X CHORO X CHORD

Figure 50.--Concluded.

209
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOM ANGLE

• 90 -- 60

.Sff 55

z.._z zZ zZ2 z.ZzZzl_z zl_l_zl_zz zzZ I_lzz z][Z Zzzzzl[Z zzZEZZz


.?8 50
-80. X
AXIAL

.72 -- CHORD '1"5


ZzZ ZEZ ZzzZZ ZZEZZ EZzZX ZZZzZ r ][ Z:[ZZ][ Z ][ZZZ ][ ZZZzzZZ Z'J[Z

.66 'tO

.60
J I I J J 35
1 I I I 1

.90 -- 6O

.8q" -- 66

Z3 z_ zZ:mz_ zZzz_zZZZZZZZZZzzzEZZ I_ZZZI[zzzzI[z_Z_ZZ

.78 50
-_O. X
AXIAL

.72 -- CHORD _5
Z_zzZ_Z_Z_zXZ_X_XZZ_zZZ_x_ZZzZZZ

• 66 --

.60 1 I I I I 35
I I I I I

• 90 -- 60 --

.8_ 55

ZZ z] I z z Zz a zz Ez z zzz_e zz zzz _-zz_s zz z:z zz_ZZZ z zl zZZ Z_[

.78 50 --
-20. X
AXIAL

.72 ---ZT_[ZzzzZZZ:[ZZZZZzlzzzZZZxz]G[zzzZzZZ_[z:[ZZ Zzzz_[£Zz CHORO

.66 _rO --

.60 I I 1 I I 3s 1 I I I I
2o ,o 6o so _oo a 2a _2 62 ea _oa
X PITCH X PIICH
Figure 51 .--Blade-to-blade distribution of relative Mach number and flow angle at 90-percent span and near stall.

210
RELATIVE NACH MUNBER PELAT]VE FLOH ANGLE

.90 60 --

.Sq- 55

.zzzzzZzUXZZzzzzZzZZZ][ZZzz z
._l _ e-zll_lz= z zzzzzz_zz
.78 SO
-I0. X
'r-lI]]'lIxZx.zZZZXZZZzz't_z A X I AL
.72 __z_.zzZzz2zllill rTZzzZZLI ZZz CflORO q'5

.66 _0

.6O I I I I I I I I I I
35

.9O 60 --

.8_ m
66

z_z_ zz
.78
- .zz.z_"zZzz_,._ -6.1X
50

AXIAL
.72 _ _illIi "%,_,.,,,. CHORO q'5
zzZZZzilllI II _z

.66 q-O

.60 I I I I I I I I I I
35

.?O 60
[IIZZXzzz
z
.8_ 56
l

[I ,
.78 50
IZ Z 0.0 X
AXIAL
.72 CHORO _5

.66 q'O

.6O I I I I I 35 I I 1 I I
20 'TO 60 80 1 O0 22 q2 62 62 I02
X P|TCH X PITCH

Figure 5l.--Continued.

211
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOM ANGLE

.6O 25.5 --
T

.5_"

.36 5.5 -- =zzxZllIllll


iiii I

.30 I I ..... I I I 0.5


I I

.6O 25,,5 I

.Sq 20.5 I

.'18 i

I 109 X
jI| rzzzzzzzz_r_'_" i 5 • 5
^XIAL

._2 - I CHOI_O 10.5 ]l


.36

.3O
_
1 I
l
1 I I
5.5

0,5
.....
" ]I i
I I ..... ;

• 60 -- 25.5 -

-- Z
15.5
I
AXIAL
]I] Izz_===_===_= 118 X
I CHORO

[ 10. 5 --

zT_Z =ZZZZXZ zzzzz'zEX


zl]

.36 5 • 5 I'IlZzz'=zz= "zzzzzz=

.3O
I I I I I 0.5 - I I _ I J
50 70 90 lO 130 150 50 70 90 110 130 150

X P I '1"OH X P]TCH

Figure 51 .--Continued.

212
RELATIVE MACH NUMBER RELATIVE FLOW ANGLE

.6O 25.5 --

.5q" B 20.5 --

,q-8 15,5 --
I2_X
AXIAL
CHORD 10,5 -- iIIt
zzzZzZiiziiII zIIIzIz
,36 6,5

- I ]
.30 I 0.5
I I I I

6O 25.5

20.6 B

't-8 15.5
I 127 X

o ...,.zitttl
AXIAL
.q'2 CHORD 10.5

zzzzZZZ zz
.36 6.6

.30 0,5 I I I I I
50 lO 90 110 130 150 50 70 90 ] 10 130 150
X PITCH X PITCH

Figure 5 I.--Concluded.

213
.a,,o.a,
Ae.ooao,,os oO Report Documentation Page
Space Adm_nislration

1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No.


NASA TP-2879

4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date

Laser Anemometer Measurements in a Transonic Axial-Flow Fan Rotor


November 1989
6. Performing Organization Code

7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No.

Anthony J. Strazisar, Jerry R. Wood, Michael D. Hathaway, E-4480


and Kenneth L. Suder
10. Work Unit No.

505-62-61
9. Performing Organization Name and Address
11. Contract or Grant No.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Lewis Research Center
Cleveland, Ohio 44135-3191
13. Type of Report and Period Covered

12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Technical Paper


National Aeronautics and Space Administration
14. Sponsoring Agency Code
Washington, D.C. 20546-0001

15 Supplementary Notes

16. Abstract

Laser anemometer surveys were made of the three-dimensional flowfield in NASA rotor 67, a low-aspect-ratio
transonic axial-flow fan rotor. The test rotor has a tip relative Mach number of 1.38. The flowfield was surveyed
at design speed for operating conditions near peak efficiency and near stall. Data are presented in the form of
relative Mach number and relative flow angle distributions on surfaces of revolution at nine spanwise locations
evenly spaced from hub to tip. At each spanwise location data were acquired upstream, within, and downstream
of the rotor. Aerodynamic performance measurements and detailed rotor blade and annulus geometry are also
presented so that the experimental results can be used as a test case for three-dimensional turbomachinery flow
analysis codes.

17. Key Words (Suggested by Author(s)) 18. Distribution Statement

Turbomachinery Unclassified- Unlimited


Compressors Subject Category 07
Laser anemometry
Computational fluid dynamics

NASA FORM 1626 OCT86


*For sale by the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161

NASA-Langley, 1989

You might also like