Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 53

Chapter 5 Carrier Transport Phenomena

03/10/08

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

We now study the effect of external fields (electric field, magnetic field) on semiconducting material

03/10/08

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Objective
Discuss drift and diffusion current densities Explain why carriers reach an average drift velocity Discuss mechanism of lattice and impurity scattering Define mobility, conductivity and resistivity Discuss temperature and impurity dependence on mobility and velocity saturation State the Einstein relation Describe the Hall effect

03/10/08

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Drift current
Electric field force on electrons and holes
Free states in conduction and valence band

net movement of electrons and holes

Net movement of charge due to electric field is called drift.

03/10/08

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Drift current density


for holes Average drift velocity

Jp

J p,drf = e p vd A /cm 2
(Volume) density of holes

vd
Jn E

for electrons

J n,drf = -e n vd A /cm 2

vd
03/10/08 5

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Velocity of the particles


E
+e

v drift velocity of the hole in the electric field

So does velocity monotonically increase with time?


03/10/08 6

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Thermal and drift velocities


Without E field With E field

vth + v

Even in the absence of E-field the holes have random thermal velocity
(vth) They collide with ionized impurity atoms and thermally vibrating lattice atoms. Let mean time between collisions. cp with E-field net drift of holes in the direction of the E-field net drift velocity is small perturbation on random thermal velocity. 03/10/08 7 so remains almost unchanged even in the presence of E-field. cp
Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Thermal and drift velocities


Without E field With E field

Now,

v peak =

e cp mp *

03/10/08

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Drift velocity vd
v peak = e cp mp * E

v
vd
0

cp

2 cp

3 cp

Average drift velocity = Using more accurate model including the effect of statistical distribution,
03/10/08 9

p (mobility)

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Mobility: vd =

For holes:

For electrons:

03/10/08

10

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Mobility: = vd /E
n (cm2/V-s ) Silicon Gallium Arsenide Germanium 1350 8500 3900 mn*/m0 Silicon Gallium Arsenide Germanium 1.08 0.067 0.55

Unit: cm2/Vs
p (cm2/V-s ) 480 400 1900 mp*/m0 0.56 0.48 0.37

03/10/08

11

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Scattering:
Two main s cattering mechanis ms Lattice s cattering or phonon s cattering Impurity s cattering

03/10/08

12

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Phonon Scattering
Phonons are lattice vibrations (Atoms randomly vibrate about their position @ T>0K)

Lattice vibration causes a local volume change and hence lattice constant change.

Bandgap generally widens with a smaller lattice constant.

Disruption of valence and conduction band edges scatters the carriers.

Mobility due to lattice scattering vibration of atoms also increases)


03/10/08

L T

3 2

(as temp increases

13

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

(a) Electron and (b) Hole mobilities in Si vs. T at different doping concentrations. (Inserts show dependence for almost intrinsic Si)
03/10/08 14

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Ionized impurity scattering

Scattering due to coulomb interaction between electrons/holes and ionized impurities. T increases thermal velocity vth increases, so less time spent for scattering I T n NI increases the scattering chance 1 increases I N I
03/10/08 15

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

High doping is required to overcome short channel effects even though it reduces mobility.

Doping level in modern processors

Electron and Hole mobility vs. impurity concentration.


03/10/08 16

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

How to combine mobility effects?

: average time between two collisions with dopant atoms I : average time between two collisions with vibrating" lattice points L
dt : Number of collisions in time dt due to impurity scattering I
d t : Number of collisions in time dt due to lattice scattering L

Total number of collisions in dt:

03/10/08

17

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Electron mobility of Si vs. T for various Na

At present doping level, cooling does not improve speed much.

90nm CMOS process

Low doping concentration or high T The lattice scattering dominates High doping concentration or low T The impurity scattering dominates
03/10/08 18

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Drift current density

n d rf

= enE

e c = * m

J increases then cut-off frequency increases circuit density increases

How can we increase J?


03/10/08 19

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

How can we increase J?


Increase mobility Strained silicon effective mass , mobility GaAs or Ge as semiconducting material Increase electric field Shorter gate length

03/10/08

20

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Strained Si

Intel 90nm process Strain decreases the effective mass, increasing the mobility already been used for production
03/10/08 21

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Conductivity

=enn +epp

Units (-cm)-1

Units -cm
03/10/08 22

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

If we assume complete ionization,

1 = e n N d or e p N a

But curve not linear because -

Impurity scattering

Impurity scattering affects mobility.

Resistivity vs. impurity concentration in Si at T=300K


03/10/08 23

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Impurity scattering affecting mobility.

Resistivity vs. impurity concentration for Ge, GaAs and GaP


03/10/08 24

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Electron concentration and conductivity vs. 1/T

Lattice scattering

03/10/08

25

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Electron concentration and conductivity vs. 1/T


Assuming a n-type material with donor doping Nd >> ni,
= e( n n + p p ) e n n
n electron concentration
= 1 = e n N d If we also assume complete ionization, Mid temp complete ionization n constant at Nd but reduces with temp due to lattice scattering so conductivity drops.

At high temperature, intrinsic carrier concentration increases and dominates both n and At low temp, due to freeze-out both n and reduce

03/10/08

26

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Ohms Law:

Ohms law

03/10/08

27

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Velocity saturation vd = E

vth for Si

Random thermal = energy


03/10/08

Modern processors (90nm,1.2V)

vth 107cm/s
28

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Intervalley transfer mechanism in GaAs

Higher effective mass, low mobility


At higher E lower mobility lower current negative resistance

Lower effective mass, high mobility

03/10/08

29

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Negative resistance
Negative resistance region -ve resistance used in design of oscillators. Oscillation frequency depends on transit time in the device.
30

Oscillator: GaAs 300GHz, GaN 3THz


03/10/08

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Carrier Diffusion

Low concentration

High concentration

Concentration

Positive slope in x-direction a flux towards negative-x direction


03/10/08 31

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Diffusion current density


for holes

D: diffusion coefficient
for electrons

03/10/08

32

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Diffusion coefficient (I)

l=average mean free path l = (vth + vdr) cp If E=0, vdr=0 l=vth cp Electron concentration versus distance.
03/10/08 33

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Diffusion coefficient (II)

n(l)(-vth) n(l)(vth)

n(-l)(-vth)

n(-l)(vth)

= sum of electron flow in +x direction at x=-l and electron flow in x direction at x=l

03/10/08

34

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Diffusion coefficient (III)

Taylor expansion of

n(-l) en n(+l) at x = 0:
+ ...

n(+l) =

03/10/08

35

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Diffusion coefficient (IV)


Recall that

D: diffusion coefficient = vthl (cm2/s)=vth2 cp

03/10/08

36

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

For holes:

Note
03/10/08 37

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Diffusion of (a) electrons and (b) holes in a density gradient


03/10/08 38

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Total Current Density

DRIFT

DIFFUSION

Generalized current Density Equation -

03/10/08

39

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

If a semiconductor is non-uniformly doped?


Consider a case where donor concentration increases in x-direction

Diffusion of electrons

Formation of electric field

Prevents further diffusion

Due to electric field potential difference across the device In the region at lower potential EF-EFi higher
03/10/08 40

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Induced Electric Field Ex


Potential:
Electric field

Assuming Electron concentration

Donor concentration

03/10/08

41

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Recall

Taking log

Take the derivative with respect to x

Electric field
03/10/08 42

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

The Einstein Relation


Consider the general current density equation:

n,p

Assume n-graded semiconductor material in thermal equilibrium:

Assuming n d N

03/10/08

43

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Substituting

dN d because 0 dx
03/10/08 44

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Similarly

03/10/08

45

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

The Hall effect


n- or p-type, carrier concentration and mobility can be experimentally measured. Electric and magnetic fields are applied to a semiconductor.

03/10/08

46

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

The Hall Effect


Hall voltage

(Lorentz force) F = qvx x Bz

Buildup of carriers here

03/10/08

47

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Due to magnetic field, both electrons and holes experience a force in y direction. In n-type material, there will be a build up of ve charge at y=0 and in p-type material, there will be a build up of +ve charge. The net charge induces a electric force in y-direction opposing the magnetic field force and in steady state they will exactly cancel each other.

03/10/08

48

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Hall Voltage:

Ey = vxBz

VH = EyW=vxWBz
03/10/08 49

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

How to determine n-type or p-type & doping concentration? For p-type material: VH will be +ve

Jx vx = ep

Ix = (ep)(Wd )
VH will be -ve

54

For n-type material:

For n-type material VH will be -ve n will still be +ve !


03/10/08 50

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

How can you determine n,

p ?

56

03/10/08

51

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Summary
Drift net movement of charge due to electric field. Drift current = J drf = e( n n p p+) E Mobility () lattice and impurity scattering Mobility due to lattice scattering L T T Mobility due to impurity scattering I Ohms law V =
L I A
3 2 3 2

NI

L =I A

RI

Drift velocity saturates at high electric field velocity saturation


03/10/08 52

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

Summary
Some semiconductors mobility reduces at high E negative resistance used in design of oscillators. Diffusion current
J diff = eDn dn dx dp eDp dx

Einstein relation relation between diffusion coefficient and Dn D p kT = mobility = e


n p

Hall effect can be used to determine semiconductor type, doping concentration and mobility
03/10/08 53

Department of Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

You might also like