Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Effectiveness of Secondary School Teachers and Their Intelligence
Effectiveness of Secondary School Teachers and Their Intelligence
IV * ISSUE-39
50
International Indexed & Referred Research Journal, April, 2012. ISSN- 0974-2832, RNI-RAJBIL 2009/29954; VoL. IV * ISSUE-39
Tools Used for collection of Data years of teaching experience in Secondary schools. 1. Students Ratings of Teaching Effectiveness by Findings of the Study Deshpande 2001. 1. The increase in Intelligence increases the Teacher 2. Standard Progressive Matrics by Raven 1992. effectiveness of teachers of Secondary schools. Data Analysis Table-1: Results of Correlation coefficient between Teacher Effectiveness with Intelligence of Teachers of Secondary Schools Variable Teacher effectiveness of Total teachers Correlation t-value p-value Sign. coefficient (r) Intelligence 0.8049 27.0566 <0.05 S The above Table shows that: The relationship between Teacher effective- 1. The increase in Intelligence increases the teacher ness and Intelligence of teachers of Secondary schools effectiveness of teachers with 1-10 years of teaching was found to be positive and significant (r=0.8049, experience in Secondary schools. The increase in Intelligence increases the p<0.05) at 0.05% level of significance. Hence, the null 2. hypothesis is rejected and alternative hypothesis is teacher effectiveness of teachers with 11 and more accepted. It means that the increase in Intelligence years of teaching experience in Secondary schools. increases the Teacher effectiveness of teachers of Discussion and Conclusion This analysis reviews a wide range of empiriSecondary schools. Table-2: Results of Correlation Coefficient between Teacher Effectiveness with Intelligence of 1-10 years of Teaching experience of Teachers of Secondary Schools Variable Teacher effectiveness of 1-10 years of teaching experience of teachers of Secondary schools Correlation coefficient (r) t-value p-value Sign. Intelligence 0.8186 22.9826 <0.05 S The above Table shows that: cal studies that examine the impact of intelligence and The relationship between Teacher effective- teacher effectiveness in order to draw conclusions ness and Intelligence of 1-10 years of teaching experi- about the extent to which these characteristics are in ence of teachers of Secondary schools was found to be fact, linked with teacher performance. Greater clarity on positive and significant (r=0.8186, p<0.05) at 0.05% the empirical evidence can inform the wisdom of curlevel of significance. Hence, the null hypothesis is rent practice, guide state efforts as they struggle with rejected and alternative hypothesis is accepted. It means no child left behind compliance regarding teacher qualthat the increase in Intelligence increases the teacher ity and provide direction for future teacher policy deeffectiveness of teachers with 1-10 years of teaching cisions. It is important to note that many personal experience in Secondary schools. Table-3: Results of Correlation Coefficient between Teacher Effectiveness with Intelligence of Teachers with 11 and More Years of Teaching Experience in Secondary Schools Variable Teacher effectiveness of 11 and More Years of Teaching Experience years of teaching experience of teachers of Secondary schools Correlation coefficient (r) t-value p-value Sign. Intelligence 0.7687 14.0177 <0.05 S The above table shows that : characteristics important for a good teacher are less measured in the studies reviewed. The focus is on The relationship between Teacher effective- aspects of teacher background that can be translated ness and Intelligence with 11 and more years of teach- into educational recommendations and incorporated ing experience of teachers of Secondary schools was into teaching practice. found to be positive and significant (r=0.0.7687, p<0.05) It is notable that findings for these characterat 0.05% level of significance. Hence, the null hypoth- istics influence teachers at the Secondary school level esis is rejected and alternative hypothesis is accepted. and that the body of research on the subject of teacher It means that the increase in Intelligence increases the effectiveness suggests that the context of teaching teacher effectiveness of teachers with 11 and more matters.
SHODH, SAMIKSHA AUR MULYANKAN
51
International Indexed & Referred Research Journal, April, 2012. ISSN- 0974-2832, RNI-RAJBIL 2009/29954; VoL. IV * ISSUE-39
|Implications of the Study The present study highlights the following recommendations based on findings are as follows: 1. To become effective teachers they should spend more time working with small groups throughout the day. 2. Effective teachers use systematic feedback with students about their performance in a very positive manner. 3. Effectiveness of teachers planning which is an important component of attitude towards teaching profession provide a variety of opportunities for students
to apply and use knowledge and skills in different learning situations. 4. Teachers who have higher rates of communication with students are viewed as more effective which is an important component of intelligence. 5. As Study highlights that higher the intelligence, higher the teacher effectiveness. Teachers should have adequate time to enhance new learning through professional development which keeps them abreast of current issues in education helps them implement innovating and refines their practice.
R E F E R E N C E
1. Andrew, M. D. (2005) Verbal Ability and Teacher Effectiveness. Hampshire: Journal of Teacher Education, 56, 4, Pp. 34. 2.Annamalai, A. R. (2000) Attitude of Teacher Towards Teaching. Experiments in Education, XXVIII (4), Pp. 69-70. 3.Aburecht, J. D. (1978) Teacher Effectiveness: Self Determined Change. Ohio: American Journal of Physics. 46, 4, Pp. 324-328. 4.Medley, D. M. (1982) Teacher Competency Testing and the Teacher Educator. Charlottesville, VA: Association of Teacher Educators and the Bureau of Educational Research, University of Virginia.
52