Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 79

EDITORIAL DEPARTMENT

AGREEMENT WITH FREELANCE CONTRIBUTORS


Unless modified in writing, this Agreement is intended to cover any and all Works
(hereinafter "the Work") you create for use by The Washington Post Editorial Department
(hereinafter "The Post"), or otherwise license for use by The Post.
You and The Post agree to the following terms:
1. In exchange for The Post considering the submitted work, you agree to give The
Post exclusive, first-time print publication rights to theW ork, as well as the subsequent
non-exclusive right to reproduce, distribute, adapt or display the Work for any purpose and
in any manner or medium worldwide during the copyright term of the Work, without
additional compensation. The non-exclusive rights granted may be exercised in any form
or media in which the Work may be reproduced, published, distributed or displayed
(including but not limited to compilations, microfilm, library databases, videotext,
computer databases, CD-ROM, and the Internet). Provided, however, this non-exclusive
license limits The Post's use, transfer or sublicense of the Work to inclusion in works that
are marketed, distributed and/or grouped under or in association with The Post's name or
brand, including but not limited to distribution through the Los Angeles Times-Washington
Post News Service.
2. Other than the rights granted to The Post set forth above, you own the rights to and
are free to sell or license the Work elsewhere following publication in The Washington
Post newspaper. Any income from such sale or licensing belongs to you.
3. You represent and warrant that the Work is your creation and has not been
published previously and that The Post's reproduction and distribution of the Work will not
violate any copyright or other right of any third party. You further represent and walTant
that you have disclosed to The Post any financial or other interest you have that might be in
conflict or give the appearance of a conflict with the opinions you express in the Work.
Author's Signature Date
Full Name (please print legibly) email address (please print legibly)
Telephone Number
Complete Address (please print legibly)
Downing, Karley - GOV
From: Schrimpf, Chris- GOV
Sent:
To:
Tuesday, March 15, 20111:54 PM
Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject:
Attachments:
FW: FW: your oped is accepted
Op-Ed Agreement.doc
Chris- I couldn't find the document on your computer but I found the text that you submitted to the Post in your sent
items. It's below.
-Tom
Chris Schrimpf
Communications Director
Office of the Governor
Press Office: 608-267-7303
Email: chris.schrimpj@wisconsin.gov
From: Autumn Brewington E
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 6:13PM
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject: Re: FW: your oped is accepted
Thank you!
Autumn Brewington
Assistant Editorial Editor
From:
To:
Date:
"Schrimpf, Chris -- ~ G i O i i V I " i<Ciihlrlis.
1
sc
1
h
1
rimiipilf@ijwiijscjionsin.gov>
Autumn Brewington ~
0311412011 07:08
Subject FW: your oped is accepted
Just faxed the gov's signature
Chris Schrimpf
Communications Director
Office of the Governor
Press Office: 608-267-7303
Email: chris.schrimp@wisconsin.gov
From: Rachel Manteuffel [!lli!WN;i
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011
64
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject: your oped is accepted
Thank you very much for sending this op-ed. Provided that it is exclusive, The Washington Post would like to publish it.
Please notify of any conflicts of interest that might be relevant to this op-ed, including but not limited to financial or family
" " l , t i n n ~ ~ i n ~ with any of the subjects of the article. If any such conflicts exist, we can discuss how and whether those
reply to this message (which should be directed to to
please answer the following questions:
solely by the identified author or authors?
2. Did any person or organization request or suggest that this column be written?
3. Have you submitted this piece, or a similar column, to any other publications or otherwise posted it online, including on
a blog or as a press release?
4. Have the author or authors ever received any funding, for research or otherwise, from organizations or persons
identified in the column?
For recordkeeping purposes, please also send the author's full name, mailing address, and home and office phone
numbers, including one that works after business hours.
The op-ed may be edited for style and space considerations. We may not yet have a specific date for when the piece will
run, but our op-ed editor, Autumn Brewington, will be in touch regarding edits and scheduling. Please note that it is
common for accepted op-eds not to be published right away.
related to this op-ed -- iinrh orlinn
and to our copy desk
Please fax the attached HmP.ement
directed tol.l
Thanks,
Rachel Manteuffel
Editorial Aide
The Washington Post
From:
To;
Date:
Subject: Oped Submission from Governor Walker
would like to make to the text-- to
. rather than to me.
Questions about the fax can be
Governor Walker would like to submit the oped below for consideration by the Post. I understand you receive hundreds or
thousands of submissions each day. If possible we would greatly appreciate knowing your interest in publishing the piece,
so we can offer it to another paper if you decline. Many thanks, Chris
Imagine the outrage if government workers did not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits.
Consider the massive protests by labor leaders from all across the country.
Think I'm talking about Wisconsin? No, I'm talking about the federal government.
Contrary to what the Obama administration would lead you to believe, most federal government employees
do not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits. That means the budget reform plan we signed into
law in Wisconsin is more generous than what President Obama offers federal employees.
Our budget reform plan calls for a 5.8% pension contribution and a 12.6% health insurance premium payment
(both well below what middle class workers pay). Federal government workers pay an average of 28% of
65
health insurance costs.
It's enough to make you wonder why there are no protestors circling the White House this very minute.
My brother is a banquet manager and occasional bartender at a hotel. My sister-in-law works for a
department store and they have two beautiful kids. They are a typical middle class family in Wisconsin. When
we first introduced our reforms a month ago, my brother reminded me that he pays nearly $800 a month for
health insurance and the little bit he can put away in his 401(k). He said workers like him would love the plan
I'm offering public employees.
As my brother recognizes, our plan is a good deal for government workers when compared to what other
middle class workers are paying for benefits. It would even be a great deal for federal workers.
Nearly every state in the country is facing a major budget deficit just like the federal government. Many are
cutting billions of dollars of aid to schools and local governments. These cuts lead to massive layoffs or
massive property tax increases- or both.
In Wisconsin, we have a better option to tackle our $3.6 billion deficit. Our reform plan gives state and local
governments the tools to balance the budget through reasonable benefit contributions. In total our budget
repair bill saves local governments almost $1.5 billion, outweighing the reductions in state aid in our budget.
The financial savings in our budget reforms save 1,500 jobs in this fiscal year and 10,000 jobs over the next
two years. The savings come from giving state and local governments the tools to manage benefit costs
through collective bargaining reform.
Some have questioned the need to reform collective bargaining. After all, they say, the union bosses in
Washington, DC said publicly that their workers were ready to pay a little bit more for their benefits. The
truth Is that as the national union bosses were saying one thing, their locals were doing something entirely
different. Over the past several weeks, local unions across the state have pursued contracts without new
pension or health insurance contributions. Some have even pushed through pay increases.
Their actions leave one wondering how tone deaf and out of touch the union bosses are with what's
happening in the private sector. Even the President instituted a pay freeze on government workers this year;
something that he was only able to do because federal employees enjoy fewer collective bargaining rights
than Wisconsin workers do- even now after our reforms are placed into law.
Beyond balancing budgets, our reforms give schools- as well as state and local governments- the tools to
improve their operations. We allow them to reward merit and performance- instead of facing the barriers of
collective bargaining that currently block innovation and reform.
When Governor Mitch Daniels repealed collective bargaining in Indiana six years ago, it helped government
become more efficient and effective to the people. Passing our budget repair bill will help put into place
similar reforms in Wisconsin.
Ultimately, our budget repair bill is about a commitment to the future. We are making the difficult decisions
now, so that our children don't face even more dire consequences.
Taking on the status quo is no easy task. Each day, there have been protesters in and around our state
Capitol. They have every right to be heard, just as the President does. But it should also be clear that their
voices cannot drown out the countless voices of the middle class taxpayers who want us to balance our
budgets and, more importantly, want us to make government to work for each of them.
Chris Schrimpf
Communications Director
Office of the Governor
Press Office: 608-267-7303
Email: chris.schrimpf@wisconsin.gov
66
EDITORIAL DEPARTMENT
AGREEMENT WITH FREELANCE CONTRIBUTORS
Unless modified in writing, this Agreement is intended to cover any and all Works
(hereinafter "the Work") you create for use by The Washington Post Editorial Department
(hereinafter "The Post"), or otherwise license for use by The Post.
You and The Post agree to the following terms:
1. In exchange for The Post considering the submitted work, you agree to give The
Post exclusive, first-time print publication rights to the Work, as well as the subsequent
non-exclusive right to reproduce, distribute, adapt or display the Work for any purpose and
in any manner or medium worldwide during the copyright term of the Work, without
additional compensation. The non-exclusive rights granted may be exercised in any form
or media in which the Work may be reproduced, published, distributed or displayed
(including but not limited to compilations, microfilm, library databases, videotext,
computer databases, CD-ROM, and the Internet). Provided, however, this non-exclusive
license limits The Post's use, transfer or sublicense of the Work to inclusion in works that
are marketed, distributed and/or grouped under or in association with The Post's name or
brand, including but not limited to distribution through the Los Angeles Times-Washington
Post News Service.
2. Other than the rights granted to The Post set forth above, you own the rights to and
are free to sell or license the Work elsewhere following publication in The Washington
Post newspaper. Any income from such sale or licensing belongs to you.
3. You represent and warrant that the Work is your creation and has not been
published previously and that The Post's reproduction and distribution of the Work will not
violate any copyright or other right of any third party. You fmther represent and warrant
that you have disclosed to The Post any financial or other interest you have that might be in
conflict or give the appearance of a conflict with the opinions you express in the Work.
Author's Signature Date
Full Name (please print legibly) email address (please print legibly)
Telephone Number
Complete Address (please print legibly)
Downing, Karley - GOV
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent:
To:
Tuesday, March 15, 20111:55 PM
Evenson, Tom - GOV
Subject:
Attachments:
Fw: FW: your oped is accepted
Op-Ed Agreement.doc
Does this have the highlights?
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 01:53PM
To: Schrimpf, Chris- GOV
Subject: FW: FW: your oped is accepted
Chris- I couldn't find the document on your computer but I found the text that you submitted to the Post in your sent
items. It's below.
-Tom
Chris Schrimpf
Communications Director
Office of the Governor
Press Office: 608-267-7303
Email: chris.schrimp.f@wisconsin.gov
From: Autumn Brewington [moailt<):t
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 6:
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject: Re: FW: your oped is accepted
Thank you!
Autumn Brewington
Assistant Editorial Page Editor
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
"Schrimpf, Chris ~
Autumn Brewington
0311412011 07:08
F'N: your oped is accepted
Just faxed the gov's signature
Chris Schrimpf
Communications Director
Office of the Governor
Press Office: 608-267-7303
60
Email: chris.schrimpf@wisconsin.gov
From: Rachel Manteuffel [mailto -
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject: your oped is accepted
Thank you very much for sending this op-ed. Provided that it is exclusive, The Washington Post would like to publish it.
Please notify of any conflicts of interest that might be relevant to this op-ed, including but not limited to financial or family
relationships with any of the subjects of the article. If any such conflicts exist, we can discuss how whether those
should be disclosed. In your reply to this message (which should be directed and to
please answer the following questions:
1. Was this p1ece written solely by the identified author or authors?
2. Did any person or organization request or suggest that this column be written?
3. Have you submitted this piece, or a similar column, to any other publications or otherwise posted it online, including on
a blog or as a press release?
4. Have the author or authors ever received any funding, for research or otherwise, from organizations or persons
identified in the column?
For recordkeeping purposes, please also send the author's full name, mailing address, and home and office phone
numbers, including one that works after business hours.
The op-ed may be edited for style and space considerations. We may not yet have a specific date for when the piece will
run, but our op-ed editor, Autumn Brewington, will be in touch regarding edits and scheduling. Please note that it is
common for accepted op-eds not to be published right away.
Please send correspondence related to this op-ed -- including any changes you would like to make to the text -- to
Thanks,
Rachel Manteuffel
Editorial Aide
The Washington Post
From:
To:
Date:
and to our copy desk at opedreply@washpost.com, rather than to me.
Questions about the fax can be
Subject: Oped Submission from Governor Walker
Governor Walker would like to submit the oped below for consideration by the Post. I understand you receive hundreds or
thousands of submissions each day. If possible we would greatly appreciate knowing your interest in publishing the piece,
so we can offer it to another paper if you decline. Many thanks, Chris
Imagine the outrage if government workers did not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits.
61
Consider the massive protests by labor leaders from all across the country.
Think I'm talking about Wisconsin? No, I'm talking about the federal government.
Contrary to what the Obama administration would lead you to believe, most federal government employees
do not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits. That means the budget reform plan we signed into
law in Wisconsin is more generous than what President Obama offers federal employees.
Our budget reform plan calls for a 5.8% pension contribution and a 12.6% health insurance premium payment
(both well below what middle class workers pay). Federal government workers pay an average of 28% of
health insurance costs.
It's enough to make you wonder why there are no protestors circling the White House this very minute.
My brother is a banquet manager and occasional bartender at a hotel. My sister-in-law works for a
department store and they have two beautiful kids. They are a typical middle class family in Wisconsin. When
we first introduced our reforms a month ago, my brother reminded me that he pays nearly $800 a month for
health insurance and the little bit he can put away in his 401(k). He said workers like him would love the plan
I'm offering public employees.
As my brother recognizes, our plan is a good deal for government workers when compared to what other
middle class workers are paying for benefits. It would even be a great deal for federal workers.
Nearly every state in the country is facing a major budget deficit just like the federal government. Many are
cutting billions of dollars of aid to schools and local governments. These cuts lead to massive layoffs or
massive property tax increases- or both.
In Wisconsin, we have a better option to tackle our $3.6 billion deficit. Our reform plan gives state and local
governments the tools to balance the budget through reasonable benefit contributions. In total our budget
repair bill saves local governments almost $1.5 billion, outweighing the reductions in state aid in our budget.
The financial savings in our budget reforms save 1,500 jobs in this fiscal year and 10,000 jobs over the next
two years. The savings come from giving state and local governments the tools to manage benefit costs
through collective bargaining reform.
Some have questioned the need to reform collective bargaining. After all, they say, the union bosses in
Washington, DC said publicly that their workers were ready to pay a little bit more for their benefits. The
truth is that as the national union bosses were saying one thing, their locals were doing something entirely
different. Over the past several weeks, local unions across the state have pursued contracts without new
pension or health insurance contributions. Some have even pushed through pay increases.
Their actions leave one wondering how tone deaf and out oftouch the union bosses are with what's
happening in the private sector. Even the President instituted a pay freeze on government workers this year;
something that he was only able to do because federal employees enjoy fewer collective bargaining rights
than Wisconsin workers do- even now after our reforms are placed into law.
Beyond balancing budgets, our reforms give schools- as well as state and local governments- the tools to
improve their operations. We allow them to reward merit and performance- instead of facing the barriers of
collective bargaining that currently block innovation and reform.
When Governor Mitch Daniels repealed collective bargaining in Indiana six years ago, it helped government
become more efficient and effective to the people. Passing our budget repair bill will help put into place
similar reforms in Wisconsin.
Ultimately, our budget repair bill is about a commitment to the future. We are making the difficult decisions
now, so that our children don't face even more dire consequences.
Taking on the status quo is no easy task. Each day, there have been protesters in and around our state
Capitol. They have every right to be heard, just as the President does. But it should also be clear that their
voices cannot drown out the countless voices of the middle class taxpayers who want us to balance our
budgets and, more importantly, want us to make government to work for each of them.
62
Chris Schrimpf
Communications Director
Office of the Governor
Press Office: 608-267-7303
Email: chris.schrimpf@,wisconsin.gov
63
EDITORIAL DEPARTMENT
AGREEMENT WITH FREELANCE CONTRIBUTORS
Unless modified in writing, this Agreement is intended to cover any and all Works
(hereinafter "the Work") you create for use by The Washington Post Editorial Department
(hereinafter "The Post"), or otherwise license for use by The Post.
You and The Post agree to the following terms:
1. In exchange for The Post considering the submitted work, you agree to give The
Post exclusive, first-time printpublication rights to the Work, as well as the subsequent
non-exclusive right to reproduce, distribute, adapt or display the Work for any purpose and
in any manner or medium worldwide during the copyright term of the Work, without
additional compensation. The non-exclusive tights granted may be exercised in any form
or media in which the Work may be reproduced, published, disttibuted or displayed
(including but not limited to compilations, microfilm, library databases, videotext,
computer databases, CD-ROM, and the Intemet). Provided, however, this non-exclusive
license limits The Post's use, transfer or sublicense of the Work to inclusion in works that
are marketed, distributed and/or grouped under or in association with The Post's name or
brand, including but not limited to distribution through the Los Angeles Times-Washington
Post News Service.
2. Other than the rights granted to The Post set forth above, you own the rights to and
are free to sell or license the Work elsewhere following publication in The Washington
Post newspaper. Any income from such sale or licensing belongs to you.
3. You represent and warrant that the Work is your creation and has not been
published previously and that The Post's reproduction and distribution of the Work will not
violate any copyright or other right of any third party. You further represent and warrant
that you have disclosed to The Post any financial or other interest you have that might be in
conflict or give the appearance of a conflict with the opinions you express in the Work.
Author's Signature Date
Full Name (please print legibly) email address (please print legibly)
Telephone Number
Complete Address (please print legibly)
Downing, Karley - GOV
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent:
To:
Tuesday, March 15, 20111:55 PM
Evenson, Tom - GOV
Subject: Re: FW; your oped is accepted
I need the oped with the highlights on it if its anywhere to be found
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 01:54PM
To: Evenson, Tom - GOV
Subject: Fw: FW: your oped is accepted
Does this have the highlights?
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 01:53PM
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject: FW: FW: your oped is accepted
Chris- I couldn't find the document on your computer but I found the text that you submitted to the Post in your sent
items. It's below.
-Tom
Chris Schrimpf
Communications Director
Office of the Governor
Press Office: 608-267-7303
Email: chris.schrimpj@wisconsin.gov
From: Autumn Brewington [mailto.-...i.j; iiiiiii--------------
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 6:13PM
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject: Re: FW: your oped is accepted
Thank you!
From:
To:
Date:
Subject;
"Schrimpf, Chrfs-
Autumn Brewington
03/14/2011 07:08
FW; your oped is accepted
56
Just faxed the gov's signature
Chris Schrimpf
Communications Director
Office of the Governor
Press Office: 608-267-7303
Email: chris.schrimp/@wisconsin.gov
From: Rachel Manteuffel I
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 3:23PM
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject: your oped is accepted
Thank you very much for sending this op-ed. Provided that it is exclusive, The Washington Post would like. to publish it.
Please notify of any conflicts of interest that might be relevant to this op-ed, including but not limited to financial or family
relationships with any of the subjects of the article. If any such conflicts exist, we can discuss how and whether those
should be disclosed. In your reply to this message (which should be directed to nd to
please answer the following questions:
1. Was this piece written solely by the identified author or authors?
2. Did any person or organization request or suggest that this column be written?
3. Have you submitted this piece, or a similar column, to any other publications or otherwise posted it online, including on
a blog or as a press release?
4. Have the author or authors ever received any funding, for research or otherwise, from organizations or persons
identified in the column?
For recordkeeping purposes, please also send the author's full name, mailing address, and home and office phone
numbers, including one that works after business hours.
The op-ed may be edited for style and space considerations. We may not yet have a specific date for when the piece will
run, but our op-ed editor, Autumn Brewington, will be in touch regarding edits and scheduling. Please note that it is
common for accepted op-eds not to be published right away.
Please send correspondence related to this op-ed-- including any changes you would like to make to the text-- to
and to our copy desk rather than to me.
Please fax the attached agreement form at
directed
Thanks,
Rachel Manteuffel
Editorial Aide
The Washington Post
earliest convenience to 202-334-5269. Questions about the fax can be
to_..
From:
To:
Date:
"Schrimpf, GOV" <Chris.Schrimpf@wisconsin.gov> -f'
-----------"<
03/14/2011 09:00AM
Subject: Oped Submission from Governor Walker
57
Governor Walker would like to submit the oped below for consideration by the Post I understand you receive hundreds or
thousands of submissions each day. If possible we would greatly appreciate knowing your interest in publishing the piece,
so we can offer it to another paper if you decline. Many thanks, Chris
Imagine the outrage if government workers did not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits.
Consider the massive protests by labor leaders from all across the country.
Think I'm talking about Wisconsin? No, I'm talking about the federal government.
Contrary to what the Obama administration would lead you to believe, most federal government employees
do not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits. That means the budget reform plan we signed into
law in Wisconsin is more generous than what President Obama offers federal employees.
Our budget reform plan calls for a 5.8% pension contribution and a 12.6% health insurance premium payment
(both well below what middle class workers pay). Federal government workers pay an average of 28% of
health insurance costs.
It's enough to make you wonder why there are no protestors circling the White House this very minute.
My brother is a banquet manager and occasional bartender at a hotel. My sister-in-law works for a
department store and they have two beautiful kids. They are a typical middle class family in Wisconsin. When
we first introduced our reforms a month ago, my brother reminded me that he pays nearly $800 a month for
health insurance and the little bit he can put away in his 401(k). He said workers like him would love the plan
I'm offering public employees.
As my brother recognizes, our plan is a good deal for government workers when compared to what other
middle class workers are paying for benefits. It would even be a great deal for federal workers.
Nearly every state in the country is facing a major budget deficit just like the federal government. Many are
cutting billions of dollars of aid to schools and local governments. These cuts lead to massive layoffs or
massive property tax increases- or both.
In Wisconsin, we haVe a better option to tackle our $3.6 billion deficit. Our reform plan gives state and local
governments the tools to balance the budget through reasonable benefit contributions. In total our budget
repair bill saves local governments almost $1.5 billion, outweighing the reductions in state aid in our budget.
The financial savings in our budget reforms save 1,500 jobs in this fiscal year and 10,000 jobs over the next
two years. The savings come from .giving state and local governments the tools to manage benefit costs
through collective bargaining reform.
Some have questioned the need to reform collective bargaining. After all, they say, the union bosses in
Washington, DC said publicly that their workers were ready to pay a little bit more for their benefits. The
truth is that as the national union bosses were saying one thing, their locals were doing something entirely
different. Over the past several weeks, local unions across the state have pursued contracts without new
pension or health insurance contributions. Some have even pushed through pay increases.
Their actions leave one wondering how tone deaf and out of touch the union bosses are with what's
happening in the private sector. Even the President instituted a pay freeze on government workers this year;
something that he was only able to do because federal employees enjoy fewer collective bargaining rights
than Wisconsin workers do -even now after our reforms are placed into law.
Beyond balancing budgets, our reforms give schools- as well as state and local governments- the tools to
improve their operations. We allow them to reward merit and performance- instead of facing the barriers of
collective bargaining that currently block innovation and reform.
When Governor Mitch Daniels repealed collective bargaining in Indiana six years ago, it helped government
become more efficient and effective to the people. Passing our budget repair bill will help put into place
similar reforms in Wisconsin.
Ultimately, our budget repair bill is about a commitment to the future. We are making the difficult decisions
now, so that our children don't face even more dire consequences.
Taking on the status quo is no easy task. Each day, there have been protesters in and around our state
58
Capitol. They have every right to be heard, just as the President does. But it should also be clear that their
voices cannot drown out the countless voices of the middle class taxpayers who want us to balance our
budgets and, more importantly, want us to make government to work for each of them.
Chris Schrimpf
Communications Director
Office of the Governor
Press Office: 608-267-7303
Email: chris.schrimpj@Jwisconsin.gov
59
Downing, Karley - GOV
From: Evenson, Tom - GOV
Sent:
To:
Tuesday, March 15, 20111:56 PM
Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject: Re: FW: your oped is accepted
No it didn't have highlights
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 01:54 PM
To: Evenson, Tom - GOV
Subject: Fw: FW: your oped is accepted
Does this have the highlights?
From: Sc\:lrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 01:53 PM
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject: FW: FW: your oped is accepted
Chris -I couldn't find the document on your computer but I found the text that you submitted to the Post in your sent
items. It's below.
-Tom
Chris Schrimpf
Communications Director
Office of the Governor
Press Office: 608-267-7303
Email: chris.schrimpj@wisconsin.gov
From: Autumn Brewington
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject: Re: FW: your oped is accepted
Thank you!
From:
To:
Date:
Subject
"Schrimpf, Chris --G!I!OV" <ICihlris
1
.silchrlmiipf@iwMIIsconsin.gov>
Autumn
03/14/2011 07:08PM
FW: your oped is accepted
52
Just faxed the gov's signature
Chris Schrimpf
Commtfnications Director
Office of the Governor
Press Office: 608-267-7303
Email: chris.schrimpf@wisconsin. gov
From: Rachel Manteuffel ~ ~ ~
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 3:23PM
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject: your oped is accepted
Thank you very much for sending this op-ed. Provided that it is exclusive, The Washington Post would like to publish it.
Please notify of any conflicts of interest that might be relevant to this op-ed, including but not limited to financial or family
relationships with ahy of the subjects of the article. If any such conflicts exist, we how those
~ r reply to this message (which should be directed to and to
----' please answer the following questions:
1. Was this piece written solely by the identified author or authors?
2. Did any person or organization request or suggest that this column be written?
3. Have you submitted this piece, or a similar column, to any other publications or otherwise posted it online, including on
a blog or as a press release?
4. Have the author or authors ever received any funding, for research or otherwise, from organizations or persons
identified in the column?
For recordkeeping purposes, please also send the author's full name, mailing address, and home and office phone
numbers, including one that works after business hours.
The op-ed may be edited for style and space considerations. We may not yet have a specific date for when the piece will
run, but our op-ed editor, Autumn Brewington, will be in touch regarding edits and scheduling. Please note that it is
common for accepted op-eds not to be published right away.
Please fax the attached ameement form at your earliest convenience
directed to or
Thanks,
Rachel Manteuffel
Editorial Aide
The Washington Post
would like to make to the text -- to
rather than to me.
Questions about the fax can be
From: "Schrimpf, Chris- GOV'' <Chris.Schrimpf@wisconsi,n . goiivl>
To: " ~
Date: 03/14/2011 09:00AM
Subject Oped Submission from Governor Walker
53
Governor Walker would like to submit the oped below for consideration by the Post. I understand you receive hundreds or
thousands of submissions each day. If possible we would greatly appreciate knowing your interest in publishing the piece,
so we can offer it to another paper if you decline. Many thanks, Chris
Imagine the outrage if government workers did not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits.
Consider the massive protests by labor leaders from all across the country.
Think I'm talking about Wisconsin? No, I'm talking about the federal government.
Contrary to what the Obama administration would lead you to believe, most federal government employees
do not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits. That means the budget reform plan we signed into
law in Wisconsin is more generous than what President Obama offers federal employees.
Our budget reform plan calls for a 5.8% pension contribution and a 12.6% health insurance premium payment
(both well below what middle class workers pay}. Federal government workers pay an average of 28% of
health insurance costs.
It's enough to make you wonder why there are no protestors circling the White House this very minute.
My brother is a banquet manager and occasional bartender at a hotel. My sister-in-law works for a
department store and they have two beautiful kids. They are a typical middle class family in Wisconsin. When
we first introduced our reforms a month ago, my brother reminded me that he pays nearly $800 a month for
health insurance and the little bit he can put away in his 401(k}. He said workers like him would love the plan
I'm offering public employees.
As my brother recognizes, our plan is a good deal for government workers when compared to what other
middle class workers are paying for benefits. It would even be a great deal for federal workers.
Nearly every state in the country is facing a major budget deficit just like the federal government. Many .are
cutting billions of dollars of aid to schools and local governments. These cuts lead to massive layoffs or
massive property tax increases- or both.
In Wisconsin, we have a better option to tackle our $3.6 billion deficit. Our reform plan gives state and local
governments the tools to balance the budget through reasonable benefit contributions. In total our budget
repair bill saves local governments almost $1.5 billion, outweighing the reductions in state aid in our budget.
The financial savings in our budget reforms save 1,500 jobs in this fiscal year and 10,000 jobs over the next
two years. The savings come from giving state and local governments the tools to manage benefit costs
through collective bargaining reform.
Some have questioned the need to reform collective bargaining. After all, they say, the union bosses in
Washington, DC said publicly that their workers were ready to pay a little bit more for their benefits. The
truth is that as the national union bosses were saying one thing, their locals were doing something entirely
different. Over the past several weeks, local unions across the state have pursued contracts without new
pension or health insurance contributions. Some have even pushed through pay increases.
Their actions leave one wondering how tone deaf and out of touch the union bosses are with what's
happening in the private sector. Even the President instituted a pay freeze on government workers this year;
something that he was only able to do because federal employees enjoy fewer collective bargaining rights
than Wisconsin workers do- even now after our reforms are placed into law.
Beyond balancing budgets, our reforms give schools- as well as state and local governments- the tools to
improve their operations. We allow them to reward merit and performance- instead of facing the barriers of
collective bargaining that currently block innovation and reform.
When Governor Mitch Daniels repealed collective bargaining in Indiana six years ago, it helped government
become more efficient and effective to the people. Passing our budget repair bill will help put into place
similar reforms in Wisconsin.
Ultimately, our budget repair bill is about a commitment to the future. We are making the difficult decisions
now, so that our children don't face even more dire consequences.
Taking on the status quo is no easy task. Each day, there have been protesters in and around our state
54
Capitol. They have every right to be heard, just as the President does. But it should also be clear that their
voices cannot drown out the countless voices of the middle class taxpayers who want us to balance our
budgets and, more importantly, want us to make government to work for each ofthem.
Chris Schrimpf
Communications Director
Office of the Governor
Press Office: 608-267-7303
Email: Chris.schrimpj@wisconsin.gov
55
Downing, Karley - GOV
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent:
To:
Tuesday, March 15, 20111:57 PM
Evenson, Tom - GOV
Subject: Re: FW: your oped is accepted
Try opening up a new word document see if any autosaved things pop up on the side panel
From: Evenson, Tom - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 01:55 PM
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject: Re: FW: your oped is accepted
No it didn't have highlights
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 01:54PM
To: Evenson, Tom - GOV
Subject: Fw: FW: your oped is accepted
Does this have the highlights?
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 01:53 PM
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject: FW: FW: your oped is accepted
Chris- I couldn't find the document on your computer but I found the text that you submitted to the Post in your sent
items. It's below.
-Tom
Chris Schrimpf
Communications Director
Office of the Governor
Press Office: 608-267-7303
Email: chris.schrimpj@wisconsin.gov
From: Autumn Brewington
Sent: Monday, Mgrch 14, 2011 6:13PM
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject: Re: FW: your oped is accepted
Thank you!
48
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Autumn
03/14/2011
FIN: your oped Is accepted
Just faxed the gov's signature
Chris Schrimpf
Communications Director
Office of the Governor
Press Office: 608-267-7303
Email: chris.schrimpf@wisconsin.gov
From: Rachel Manteuffel (!ru!llli;l:j
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject: your oped is accepted
Thank you very much for sending this op-ed. Provided that it is exclusive, The Washington Post would like to publish it.
Please notify of any conflicts of interest that might be relevant to this op-ed, including but not limited to financial or family
relationships with any of the subjects of the article. If any such conflicts exist, those
reply to this message (which should be directed to
plel3Se answer the following questions:
by the identified author or authors?
2. Did any person or i request or suggest that this column be written?
3. Have you submitted this piece, or a similar column, to any other publications or otherwise posted it online, including on
a blog or as a press release?
4. Have the author or authors ever received any funding, for research or otherwise, from organizations or persons
identified in the column?
For recordkeeping purposes, please also send the author's full name, mailing address, and home and office phone
numbers, including one that works after business hours.
The op-ed may be edited for style and space considerations. We may not yet have a specific date for when the piece will
run, but our op-ed editor, Autumn Brewington, will be in touch regarding edits and scheduling. Please note that it is
common for accepted op-eds not to be published right away.
Please fax
directed to
Thanks,
Rachel Manteuffel
Editorial Aide
The Washington Post
related to this op-ed -- like to make to the text-- to
and to our copy desk at--rather than to me.
"Schrimpf,
49
Date: 03/14/2011 09:00AM
Subject Oped Submission from Governor Walker
Governor Walker would like to submit the oped below for consJderation by the Post. I understand you receive hundreds or
thousands of submissions each day. If possible we would greatly appreciate knowing your interest in publishing the piece,
so we can offer it to another paper if you decline. Many thanks, Chris
Imagine the outrage if government workers did not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits.
Consider the massive protests by labor leaders from all across the country.
Think I'm talking about Wisconsin? No, I'm talking about the federal government.
Contrary to what the Obama administration would lead you to believe, most federal government employees
do not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits. That means the budget reform plan we signed into
law in Wisconsin is more generous than what President Obama offers federal employees.
Our budget reform plan calls for a 5.8% pension contribution and a 12.6% health insurance premium payment
(both well below what middle class workers pay). Federal government workers pay an average of 28% of
health insurance costs.
It's enough to make you wonder why there are no protestors circling the White House this very minute.
My brother is a banquet manager and occasional bartender at a hotel. My sister-in-law works for a
department store and they have two beautiful kids. They are a typical middle class family in Wisconsin. When
we first introduced our reforms a month ago, my brother reminded me that he pays nearly $800 a month for
health insurance and the little bit he can put away in his 401(k). He said workers like him would love the plan
I'm offering public employees.
As my brother recognizes, our plan is a good deal for government workers when compared to what other
middle class workers are paying for benefits. It would even be a great deal for federal workers.
Nearly every state In the country is facing a major budget deficit just like the federal government. Many are
cutting billions of dollars of aid to schools and local governments. These cuts lead to massive layoffs or
massive property tax increases- or both.
In Wisconsin, we have a better option to tackle our $3.6 billion deficit. Our reform plan gives state and local
governments the tools to balance the budget through reasonable benefit contributions. In total our budget
repair bill saves local governments almost $1.5 billion, outweighing the reductions in state aid in our budget.
The financial savings in our budget reforms save 1,500 jobs in this fiscal year and 10,000 jobs over the next
two years. The savings come from giving state and local governments the tools to manage benefit costs
through collective bargaining reform.
Some have questioned the need to reform collective bargaining. After all, they say, the union bosses in
Washington, DC said publicly that their workers were ready to pay a little bit more for their benefits. The
truth is that as the national union bosses were saying one thing, their locals were doing something entirely
different. Over the past several weeks, local unions across the state have pursued contracts without new
pension or health insurance contributions. Some have even pushed through pay increases.
Their actions leave one wondering how tone deaf and out of touch the union bosses are with what's
happening in the private sector. Even the President instituted a pay freeze on government workers this year;
something that he was only able to do because federal employees enjoy fewer collective bargaining rights
than Wisconsin workers do- even now after our reforms are placed into law.
Beyond balancing budgets, our reforms give schools- as well as state and local governments- the tools to
improve their operations. We allow them to reward merit and performance- instead of facing the barriers of
collective bargaining that currently block innovation and reform.
50
When Governor Mitch Daniels repealed collective bargaining in Indiana six years ago, it helped government
become more efficient and effective to the people. Passing our budget repair bill will help put into place
similar reforms in Wisconsin.
Ultimately, our budget repair bill is about a commitment to the future. We are making the difficult decisions
now, so that our children don't face even more dire consequences.
Taking on the status quo is no easy task. Each day, there have been protesters in and around our state
Capitol. They have every right to be heard, just as the President does. But it should also be clear that their
voices cannot drown out the countless voices of the middle class taxpayers who want us to balance our
budgets and, more importantly, want us to make government to work for each of them.
Chris Schrimpf
Communications Director
Office of the Governor
Press Office: 608-267-7303
'Email: chris.schrimpf@wisconsin.gov
51
Downing, Karley - GOV
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Tuesday, March 15, 2011 2:00 PM
Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Here is the highlighted version
OPED highlighted.doc
Imagine tile outrage if government workers did not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits.
Consider the massive protests by labor leaders from all across the country.
Think I'm talking about Wisconsin? No, I'm talking about the federal government.
Contrary to what the Obama administration would lead you to believe, most federal government employees
do not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits. That means the budget reform plan we signed into
law in Wisconsin Friday is more generous than what President Obama offers federal employees.
Our budget reform plan calls for a 5.8% pension contribution from government workers, including myself, and
a 12.6% health insurance premium payment. Both are well below what middle class, private-sector workers
pay. Federal workers, however, pay an average of 28% of health insurance costs.
It's enough to make you wonder why there are no protestors circling the White House.
My brother is a banquetmanager and occasional bartender at a hotel. He pays nearly $800 a month for his
family's health insurance and the littlebit he can put toward his 401(k) He would love the plan I'm offering
public employees.
As my brother recognizes, our plan is a good deal for government workers when compared with what other
middle class workers are paying for benefits. it would even be a great deal for federal workers.
Nearly every state inthe country is facing a large budget deficit, just like the federal government. Many states
are cutting billions of dollars in funding for schools and local governments resulting in massive layoffs or
massive property tax increases- or both.
In Wisconsin, we are choosing a different way. The Wisconsin way allows local governments to balance the
budget through reasonable benefit contributions. These reasonable contributions will save local governments
almost$1.5 billion.
The financial savings in our budget reforms protect 1,500 jobs in this fiscal year and 10,000 jobs over the next
two years. The savings come from giving state and local governments the tools to manage benefit costs
through collective bargaining reform.
Some have questioned the need to reform collective bargaining. After all, they say, the union bosses in
Washington said publicly that their workers were ready to pay a little bit more for their benefits. But, the
truth is that as the national union bosses were saying one thing, their locals were doing something entirely
different. Over the past several weeks, local unions across Wisconsin have pursued contracts without new
pension or health insurance contributions. Some have even pushed through pay increases.
46
Their actions leave one wondering how tone deaf and out of touch the union bosses are with what's
happening in the private sector. Even the president instituted a pay freeze on government workers this year;
something that he was only able to do because federal employees enjoy fewer collective bargaining rights
than Wisconsin workers do- even with our recent reforms.
Beyond balancing budgets, our reforms give schools- as well as state and local governments -the tools to
improve their operations. We allow them to reward merit and performance.- instead of facing the barriers of
collective bargaining which all too often block innovation and reform. Because of our reforms government
will become more efficient and effective to the people.
Ultimately, our budget repair bill is about the next generation. Weare making the difficult decisions now, so
that our children don't have tomake even more difficult choices to balance the budget we left them.
A lot of people have made their voices heard during this debate including the President and the union
bosses. But the middle class taxpayer who wants a government that works for them also deserves a
voice. Now they have one.
Chris Schrimpf
Communications Director
Office of the Governor
Press Office: 608-267-7303
Email: chris.schrimpf@wisconsin.gov
47
Imagine the outrage if government workers did not have collective bargaining for wages
and benefits. Consider the massive protests by labor leaders from all across the country.
Think I'm talking about Wisconsin? No, I'm talking about the federal government.
Contrary to what the Obama administration would lead you to believe, most federal
government employees do not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits. That
means the budget reform plan we signed into law in Wisconsin Friday is more generous
than what President Obama offers federal employees.
Our budget reform plan calls for a 5.8% pension contribution from government workers,
including myself, and a 12.6% health insurance premium payment. Both are well below
what middle class, private-sector workers pay. Federal workers, however, pay an
average of 28% of health insurance costs.
It's enough to make you wonder why there are no protestors circling the White House.
My brother is a banquet manager and occasional bartender at a hotel. He pays nearly
$800 a month for his family's health insurance and the little bit he can put toward his
401(k) He would love the plan I'm offering public employees.
As my brother recognizes, our plan is a good deal for government workers when
compared with what other middle class workers are paying for benefits. It would even
be a great deal for federal workers.
Nearly every state in the country is facing a large budget deficit, just like the federal
government. Many states are cutting billions of dollars in funding for schools and local
governments resulting in massive layoffs or massive property tax increases- or both.
In Wisconsin, we are choosing a different way. The Wisconsin way alloWs local
governments to balance the budget through reasonable benefit contributions. These
reasonable contributions will save local governments almost $1.5.billion.
The financial savings in our budget reforms protect 1,500 jobs in this fiscal year and
10,000 jobs over the next two years. The savings come from giving state and local
governments the tools to manage benefit costs through collective bargaining reform.
Some have questioned the need to reform collective bargaining. After all, they say, the
union bosses in Washington said publicly that their workers were ready to pay a little bit
more for their benefits. But, the truth is that as the national union bosses were saying
one thing, their locals were doing something entirely different. Over the past several
weeks, local unions across Wisconsin have pursued contracts without new pension or
health insurance contributions. Some have even pushed through pay increases.
Their actions leave one wondering how tone deaf and out of touch the union bosses are
with what's happening in the private sector. Even the president instituted a pay freeze
on government workers this year; something that he was only able to do because
federal employees enjoy fewer collective bargaining rights than Wisconsin workers do-
even with our recent reforms.
Beyond balancing budgets, our reforms give schools- as well as state and local
governments- the tools to improve their operations. We allow them to reward merit
and performance- instead of facing the barriers of collective bargaining which all too
often block innovation and reform. Because of our reforms government will become
more efficient and effective to the people.
Ultimately, our budget repair bill is about the next generation. We. are making the
difficult decisions now, so that our children don't have to make even more difficult
choices to balance the. budget we left them.
A lot of people have made their voices heard during this debate including the President
and the union bosses. But the middle class taxpayer who wants a government that
works for them also deserves a voice. Now they have one.
Downing, Karley - GOV
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Thx
From: Schrimpf, Chris- GOV
Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Tuesday, March 15, 2011 2:01 PM
Evenson, Tom - GOV
Re: Here is the highlighted version
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 02:00 PM
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject: Here is the highlighted version
Imagine the outrage if government workers did not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits.
Consider the massive protests by labor leaders from all across the country.
Think I'm talking about Wisconsin? No, I'm talking about the federal government.
Contrary to what the Obama administration would lead you to believe, most federal government employees
do not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits. That means the budget reform plan we signed into
law in Wisconsin Friday is more generous than what President Obama offers federal employees.
Our budget reform plan calls for a 5.8% pension contribution from government workers, including myself, and
a 12.6% health insurance premium payment. Both are well below what middle class, private-sector workers
pay. Federal workers, however, pay an average of 28% of health insurance costs.
It's enough to make you wonder why there are no protestors circling the White House.
My brother is a banquet manager and occasional bartender at a hotel. He pays nearly $800 a month for his
family's j)ealth insurance and the little bit he can put tow.ard his 401(k) He would love the planl'm offering
public employees.
As my brother recognizes, our plan is a good deal for government workers when compared with what other
middle class workers are paying for benefits. It would even be a great deal for federal workers.
Nearly every state in the country is facing a large budget deficit, just like the federal government; Many states
are cutting billions of dollars in funding for schools and local governments resulting in massive layoffs or
massive property tax increases- or both.
In Wisconsin,we are choosing a different way. The Wisconsin way allows local governments to balance the
budget through reasonable benefit contributions. These reasonable contributions will save local governments
almost $1.5 billion.
The financial savings in our budget reforms protect 1,500 jobs in this fiscal year and 10,000 jobs over the next
two years. The savings come from giving state and local governments the tools to manage benefit costs
through collective bargaining reform.
42
Some have questioned the need to reform collective bargaining. After all, they say, the union bosses in
Washington said publicly that their workers were ready to pay a little bit more for their benefits. But, the
truth is that as the national union bosses were saying one thing, their locals were doing something entirely
different. Over the past several weeks, local unions across Wisconsin have pursued contracts without new
pension or health insurance contributions. Some have even pushed through pay increases.
Their actions leave one wondering how tone deaf and out of touch the union bosses are with what's
happening in the private sector. Even the president instituted a pay freeze on government workers this year;
something that he was only able to do because federal employees enjoy fewer collective bargaining rights
than Wisconsin workers do- even with our recent reforms.
Beyond balancing budgets, our reforms give schools- as well as state and local governments- the tools to
improve their operations. We allow them to reward merit and performance- instead of facing the barriers of
collective bargaining which all too often block innovation and reform. Because of our reforms government
will become more efficient and effective to the people.
Ultimately, our budget repair bill is about the next generation. Weare making the difficult decisions now, so
that our children don't have to make even more difficult choices to balance the budget we left them.
A lot of people have made their voices heard during this debate including the President and the union
bosses. But the middle class taxpayer who wants a government that works for them also deserves a
voice. Now they have one.
Chris Schrimpf
Communications Director
Office of the Governor
Press Office: 608-267-7303
Email: chris.schrimpj@wisconsin.gov
43
Downing, Karley - GOV
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Did this come through right?
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Tuesday, March 15, 2011 2:01 PM
'; __ _
Fw: Here is the highlighted version
OPED highlighted.doc
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 02:00 PM
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject: Here is the highlighted version
Imagine the outrage if government workers did not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits.
Consider the massive protests by labor leaders from all across the country.
Think I'm talking about Wisconsin? No, I'm talking about the federal government.
Contrary to what the Obama administration would lead you to believe, most federal government employees
do not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits. That means the budget reform plan we signed into
law in Wisconsin Friday is more generous than what President Obama offers federal employees.
Our budget reform plan calls for a 5.8% pension contribution from government workers, including myself, and
a 12.6% health insurance premium payment. Both are well below what middle class, private-sector workers
p,ay. Federal workers, however, pay an average of 28% of health insurance costs.
It's enough to make you wonder why there are no protestors circling the White House.
Mybrother is a banquet manager and occasional bartender at a hotel. He pays nearly $800 a month for his
family's health h'lstiranceandthe little bithe can put toward his 401(k) He would love the planl'm offering
public employees.
As my brother recognizes, our plan is a good deal for government workers when compared With what other
middle class workers are paying for benefits. It would even be a great deal for federal workers.
Nearly every state inthe country is facing a large budget deficit, just like the federal government. Many states
are cuttingbillions of dollars in funding for schools and local governments resulting in massive layoffs or
massive property tax increases- or both.
In Wisconsin, we are chqosing a different way. The Wisconsin way allows local governments to balance the
budget through reasonable benefit contributions. These reasonable contributions will save local governments
almost $1.5 billion.
The financial savings in our budget reforms protect 1,500 jobs in this fiscal year and 10,000 jobs over the next
40
two years. The savings come from giving state and local governments the tools to manage benefit costs
through collective bargaining reform.
Some have questioned the need to reform collective bargaining. After all, they say, the union bosses in
Washington said publicly that their workers were ready to pay a little bit more for their benefits. But, the
truth is that as the national union bosses were saying one thing, their locals were doing something entirely
different. Over the past several weeks, local unions across Wisconsin have pursued contracts without new
pension or health insurance contributions. Some have even pushed through pay increases.
Their actions leave one wondering how tone deaf and out of touch the union bosses are with what's
happening in the private sector. Even the president instituted a pay freeze on government workers this year;
something that he was only able to do because federal employees enjoy fewer collective bargaining rights
than Wisconsin workers do- even with our recent reforms.
Beyond balancing budgets, our reforms give schools- as well as state and local governments -the tools to
improve their operations. We allow them to reward merit and performance- instead of facing the barriers of
collective_ bargainingwhich all too often block innovation and reform. Because of our reforms government
will become more efficient and effective to the people.
Ultimately, our budget repair bill is about the next generation. We are makingthe difficult decisions now, so
that our children don't have to make even more difficult choices to balance the budget we left them.
A lot of people have made their voices heard durit1gthis debate including the President and the union
bosses. But the middle dass taxpayer who wants a government thatworks for them also deserves a
voice. Now they have one.
Chris Schrimpf
Communications Director
Office of the Governor
Press Office: 608-267-7303
Email: chris.schrimpj@wisconsin.gov
41
Imagine the outrage if government workers did not have collective bargaining for wages
and benefits. Consider the massive protests by labor leaders from all across the country.
Think I'm talking about Wisconsin? No, I'm talking about the federal government.
Contrary to what the Obama administration would lead you to believe, most federal
government employees do not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits. That
means the budget reform plan we signed into law in Wisconsin Friday is more generous
than what President Obama offers federal employees.
Our budget reform plan calls for a 5.8% pension contribution from government workers,
including myself, and a 12.6% health insurance premium payment. Both are well below
what middle class, private-sector workers pay. Federal workers, however, pay an
average of 28% of health insurance costs.
It's enough to make you wonder why there are no protestors circling the White House.
My brother is a banquet manager and occasional bartender at a hotel. He pays nearly
$800 a month for his family's health insurance and the little bit he can put toward his
401(k) He would love the plan I'm offering public employees.
As my brother recognizes, our plan is a good deal for government workers when
compared with what other middle class workers are paying for benefits. It would even
be a great deal for federal workers.
Nearly every state in the country is facing a large budget deficit, just like the federal
government. Many states are cutting billions of dollars in funding for schools and l.ocal
governments resulting in massive layoffs or massive property tax or both.
In Wisconsin, we are choosing a different way. The Wisconsin way allows local
governments to balance the budget through reasonable benefit contributions. These
reasonable contributions will save local governments almost $1.5 billion.
The financial savings in our budget reforms protect 1,500 jobs in this fiscal year and
10,000 jobs over the next two years. The savings come from giving state and local
governments the tools to manage benefit costs through collective bargaining reform.
Some have questioned the need to reform collective bargaining. After all, they say, the
union bosses in Washington said publicly that their workers were ready to pay a little bit
more for their benefits. But, the truth is that as the national union bosses were saying
one thing, their locals were doing something entirely different. Over the past several
weeks, local unions across Wisconsin have pursued contracts without new pension or
health insurance contributions. Some have even pushed through pay increases.
Their actions leave one wondering how tone deaf and out of touch the union bosses are
with what's happening in the private sector. Even the president instituted a pay freeze
on government workers this year; something that he was only able to do because
federal employees enjoy fewer collective bargaining rights than Wisconsin workers do-
even with our recent reforms.
Beyond balancing budgets, our reforms give schools- as well as state and local
governments- the tools to improve their operations. We allow them to reward merit
and performance- instead of facing the barriers of collective bargaining which all too
often block innovation and reform. Because of our reforms government will become
more efficient and effective to the people.
Ultimately, our budget repair bill is about the next generation. We are making the
difficult decisions now, so that our children don't have to make even more difficult
choices to balance the budget we left them.
A lot of people have made their voices heard during this debate including the President
and the union bosses. But the middle class taxpayer who wants a government that
works for them also deserves a voice. Now they have one.
Downing, Karley - GOV
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Perfect. Thank you.
Crystal D. Davis
Editorial Copy Editor
The Washington Post
Crystal D Davis
Tuesday, March 15, 2011 2:03 PM
Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Re: Fw: Here is the highlighted version
OPED highlighted.doc
"Schri{!'pf, Chris- GOV" <Chrls.Schrimpf@wisconsin.gov> To
03/15/2011 03:01 PM cc
Did this come through right?
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 02:00 PM
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject: Here is the highlighted version
Subject Fw: Here is the highlighted version
Imagine the outrage if government workers did not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits.
Consider the massive protests by labor leaders from all across the country.
Think I'm talking about Wisconsin? No, I'm talking about the federal government.
Contrary to what the Obama administration would lead you to believe, most federal government employees
do not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits. That means the budget reform plan we signed into
law in Wisconsin Friday is more generous than what President Obama offers federal employees.
Our budget reform plan calls for a 5.8% pension contribution from government workers, including myself, and
a 12.6% health insurance premium payment. Both are well below what middle class, private-sector workers
pay. Federal workers, however, pay an average of 28% of health insurance costs.
It's enough to make you wonder why there are no protestors circling the White House.
My brother is a banquet manager and occasional bartender at a hotel. He pays nearly $800 a month for his
family's health insurance and the little bit he can put toward his 401(k) He would love the plan I'm offering
public employees.
38
As my brother recognizes, our plan is a good deal for government workers when compared with what other
middle class workers are paying for benefits. It would even be a great deal for federal workers.
Nearly every state in the country is facing a large budget deficit, just like the federal government. Many states
are cutting billions of dollars in funding for schools and local governments resulting in massive layoffs or
massive property tax increases- or both.
In Wisconsin, we are choosing a different way. The Wisconsin way allows local governments to balance the
budget through reasonable benefit contributions. These reasonable contributions will save local governments
almost $1.5 billion.
The financial savings in our budget reforms protect 1,500 jobs in this fiscal year and 10,000 jobs over the next
two years. The savings come from giving state and local governments the tools to manage benefit costs
through collective bargaining reform.
Some have questioned the need to reform collective bargaining. After all, they say, the union bosses in
Washington said publicly that their workers were ready to pay a little bit more for their benefits. But, the
truth is that as the national union bosses were saying one thing, their locals were doing something entirely
different. Over the past several weeks, local unions across Wisconsin have pursued contracts without new
pension or health insurance contributions. Some have even pushed through pay increases.
Their actions leave one wondering how tone deaf and out of touch the union bosses are with what's
happening in the private sector. Even the president instituted a pay freeze on government workers this year;
something that he was only able to do because federal employees enjoy fewer collective bargaining rights
than Wisconsin workers do- even with our recent reforms.
Beyond balancing budgets, our reforms give schools- as well as state and local governments -the tools to
improve their operations. We allow them to reward merit and performance- instead of facing the barriers of
collective bargaining which all too often block innovation and reform. Because of our reforms government
will become more efficient and effective to the people.
Ultimately, our budget repair bill is about the next generation. We are making the difficult decisions now, so
that our children don't have to make even more difficult choices to balance the budget we left them.
A lot of people have made their voices heard during this debate including the President and the union
bosses. But the middle class taxpayer who wants a government that works for them also deserves a
voice. Now they have one.
Chris Schrimpf
Communications Director
Office of the Governor
Press Office: 608-267-7303
Email: chris.schrimpf@wisconsin.gov
39
Imagine the outrage if government workers did not have collective bargaining for wages
and benefits. Consider the massive protests by labor leaders from all across the country.
Think I'm talking about Wisconsin? No, I'm talking about the federal government.
Contrary to what the Obama administration would lead you to believe, most federal
government employees do not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits. That
means the budget reform plan we signed into law in Wisconsin Friday is more generous
than what President Obama offers federal employees.
Our budget reform plan calls for a 5.8% pension contribution from government workers,
including myself, and a 12.6% health insurance premium payment. Both are well below
what middle class, private-sector workers pay. Federal workers, however, pay an
average of 28% of health insurance costs.
It's enough to make you wonder why there are no protestors circling the White House.
My brother is a banquet manager and occasional bartender at a hotel. He pays nearly
$800 a month for his family's health insurance and the little bit he can put toward. his
401{k) He would love the plan I'm offering public employees.
As my brother recognizes, our plan is a good deal for government workers when
compared with what other middle class workers are paying for benefits. It would even
be a great deal for federal workers.
Nearly every state in the country is facing a large budget deficit, just.like the federal
government. Many states are cutting billions of dollars in funding for schools and local
governments resulting in massive layoffs or massive property tax increases- or both.
In Wisconsin, we are choosing a different way. The Wisconsin way allows local
governments to balance the budget through reasonable benefit contributions. These
reasonable contributions will save local governments almost $1.5 billion.
The financial savings in our budget reforms protect 1,500 jobs in this fiscal year and
10,000 jobs over the next two years. The savings come from giving state and local
governments the tools to manage benefit costs through collective bargaining reform.
Some have questioned the need to reform collective bargaining. After all, they say, the
union bosses in Washington said publicly that their workers were ready to pay a little bit
more for their benefits. But, the truth is that as the national union bosses were saying
one thing, their locals were doing something entirely different. Over the past several
weeks, local unions across Wisconsin have pursued contracts without new pension or
health insurance contributions. Some have even pushed through pay increases.
Their actions leave one wondering how tone deaf and out of touch the union bosses are
with what's happening in the private sector. Even the president instituted a pay freeze
on government workers this year; something that he was only able to do because
federal employees enjoy fewer collective bargaining rights than Wisconsin workers do-
even with our recent reforms.
Beyond balancing budgets, our reforms give schools- as well as state and local
governments- the tools to improve their operations. We allow them to reward merit
and performance- instead offacing the barriers of collective bargaining which all too
often block innovation and reform. Because of our reforms government will become
more efficient and effective to the people.
Ultimately, our budget repair bill is about the next generation. We <Jre making the
difficult decisions now, so that our children don't have to make even more difficult
choices to balance the budget we left them.
A lot of people have made theirvoices heard during this debate including the President
and the union bosses, But the middle class taxpayer who wants a government that
works for them also deserves a voice. Now they have one.
Downing, Karley - GOV
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Tuesday, March 15, 2011 4:07 PM
Evenson, Tom - GOV
We!Wie, Cullen J - GOV; Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Face book
"How much do you pay for health insurance each month?" was the questioned I asked on Face book the other day. Many
will be surprised to know that (even after the new changes) state workers will pay only $208 per month for the basic
family plan.
37
Downing, Karley - GOV
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent: u ~ > ~ J o v . March 15, 2011 4:10 PM
To:
Cc:
Subject: Re: Fw: Here is the highlighted version
Hi just wanted to check-in on the status of this
Perfect. Thank you.
Crystal D. Davis
Editorial Copy Editor
The Washington Post
"Schrimpf, Chris- GOV'' <Chris.Schrimpf@wisconsln.gov> To
03/15/2011 03:01PM cc
Subject Fw: Here is the highlighted version
Did this come through right?
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 02:00 PM
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject: Here is the highlighted version
Imagine the outrage if government workers did not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits.
Consider the massive protests by labor leaders from all across the country ..
Think I'm talking about Wisconsin? No, I'm talking about the federal government.
Contrary to what the Obama administration would lead you to believe, most federal government employees
do not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits. That means the budget reform plan we signed into
law in Wisconsin Friday is more generous than what President Obama offers federal employees.
Our budget reform plan calls for a 5.8% pension contribution from government workers, including myself, and
a 12.6% health insurance premium payment. Both are well below what middle class, private-sector workers
34
pay. Federal workers, however, pay an average of 28% of health insurance costs.
It's enough to make you wonder why there are no protestors circling the White House.
My brother is a banquet manager and occasional bartender at a hotel. He pays nearly $800 a month for his
family's health insurance and the little bit he can put toward his 401(k) He would love the plan I'm offering
public employees.
As my brother recognizes, our plan is a good deal for government workers when compared with what other
middle class workers are paying for benefits. It would even be a great deal for federal workers.
Nearly every state in the country is facing a large budget deficit, just like the federal government. Many states
are cutting billions of dollars in funding for schools and local governments resulting in massive layoffs or
massive property tax increases- or both.
In Wisconsin, we are choosing a different way. The Wisconsin way allows local governments to balance the
budget through reasonable benefit contributions. These reasonable contributions will save local governments
almost $1.5 billion.
The financial savings in our budget reforms protect 1,500 jobs in this fiscal year and 10,000 jobs over the next
two years. The savings come from giving state and local governments the tools to manage benefit costs
through collective bargaining reform.
Some have questioned the need to reform collective bargaining. After all, they say, the union bosses in
Washington said publicly that their workers were ready to pay a little bit more for their benefits. But, the
truth is that as the national union bosses 'were saying one thing, their locals were doing something entirely
different. Over the past several weeks, local unions across Wisconsin have pursued contracts without new
pension or health insurance contributions. Some have even pushed through pay increases.
Their actions leave one wondering how tone deaf and out of touch the union bosses are with what's
happening in the private sector. Even the president instituted a pay freeze on government workers this year;
something that he was only able to do because federal employees enjoy fewer collective bargaining rights
than Wisconsin workers do- even with our recent reforms.
Beyond balancing budgets, our reforms give schools- as well as state and local governments- the tools to
improve their operations. We allow them to reward merit and performance- instead of facing the barriers of
collective bargaining which all too often block innovation and reform. Because of our reforms government
will become more efficient and effective to the people.
Ultimately, our budget repair bill is about the next generation. We are making the difficult decisions now, so
that our children don't have to make even more difficult choices to balance the budget we left them.
A lot of people have made their voices heard during this debate including the President and the union
bosses. But the middle class taxpayer who wants a government that works for them also deserves a
voice. Now they have one.
Chris Schrimpf
Communications Director
Office of the Governor
35
Press Office: 608-267-7303
Email: chris.schrimp{@wisconsin.gov
36
Downing, Karley - GOV
From:
Sent:
To:
Autumn Brewington
Tuesday, March 15,
Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject:
Attachments:
Re: Fw: Here is the highlighted version
OPED highlighted.doc
Did you see an updated draft from Crystal?
F r o m : ~ _ J s- " hr-s.Schr" . >
To: ,
Date: 03 2011 03:01 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is the highlighted version
Did this come through right?
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 02:00 PM
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject: Here is the highlighted version
Imagine the outrage if government workers did not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits.
Consider the massive protests by labor leaders from all across the country.
Think I'm talking about Wisconsin? No, I'm talking about the federal government.
Contrary to what the Obama administration would lead you to believe, most federal government employees
do not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits. That means the budget reform plan we signed into
law in Wisconsin Friday is more generous than what President Obama offers federal employees.
Our budget reform plan calls for a 5.8% pension contribution from government workers, including myself, and
a 12.6% health insurance premium payment. Both are well below what middle class, private-sector workers
pay. Federal workers, however, pay an average of 28% of health insurance costs.
It's enough to make you wonder why there are no protestors circling the White House.
My brother is a banquet manager and occasional bartender at a hotel. He pays nearly $800 a month for his
family's health insurance and the little .bit he can put toward his 401(k) He would love the plan I'm offering
public employees.
32
As my brother recognizes, our plan is a good deal for government workers when compared with what other
middle class workers are paying for benefits. It would even be a great deal for federal workers.
Nearly every state in the country is facing a large budget deficit, just like the federal government. Many states
are cutting billions of dollars in funding for schools and local governments resulting in massive layoffs or
massive property tax increases- or both.
In Wisconsin, we are choosing a different way. The Wisconsin way allows local governments to balance the
budget through reasonable benefit contributions. These reasonable contributions will save local governments
almost $1.5 billion.
The financial savings in our budget reforms protect 1,500 jobs in this fiscal year and 10,000 jobs over the next
two years. The savings come from giving state and local governments the tools to manage benefit costs
through collective bargaining reform.
Some have questioned the need to reform collective bargaining. After all, they say, the union bosses in
Washington said publicly that their workers were ready to pay a little bit more for their benefits. But, the
truth is that as the national union bosses were saying one thing, their locals were doing something entirely
different. Over the past several weeks, local unions across Wisconsin have pursued contracts without new
pension or health insurance contributions. Some have even pushed through pay increases.
Their actions leave one wondering how tone deaf and out of touch the union bosses are with what's
happening in the private sector. Even the president instituted a pay freeze on government workers this year;
something that he was only able to do because federal employees enjoy fewer collective bargaining rights
than Wisconsin workers do- even with our recent reforms.
Beyond balancing budgets, our reforms give schools- as well as state and local governments- the tools to
improve their operations. We allow them to reward merit and performance- instead of facing the barriers of
collective bargaining which all too often block innovation and reform. Because of our reforms government
will become more efficient and effective to the people.
Ultimately, our budget repair bill is about the next generation. We are making the difficult decisions now, so
that our children don't have to make even more difficult choices to balance the budget we left them.
A lot of people have made their voices heard during this debate including the President and the union
bosses. But the middle class taxpayer who wants a government that works for them also deserves a
voice. Now they have one.
Chris Schrimpf
Communications Director
Office of the Governor
Press Office: 608-267-7303
Email: chris.schrimpf@wisconsin.gov
33
Imagine the outrage if government workers did not have collective bargaining for wages
and benefits. Consider the massive protests by labor leaders from all across the country.
Think I'm talking about Wisconsin? No, I'm talking about the federal government.
Contrary to what the Obama administration would lead you to believe, most federal
government employees do not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits. That
means the budget reform plan we signed into law in Wisconsin Friday is more generous
than what President Obama offers federal employees.
Our budget reform plan calls for a 5.8% pension contribution from government workers,
including myself, and a 12.6% health insurance premium payment. Both are well below
what middle class, private-sector workers pay. Federal workers, however, pay an
average of 28% of health insurance costs.
It's enough to make you wonder why there are no protestors circling the White House.
My brother is a banquet manager and occasional bartender at a hotel. He pays nearly
$800 a month for his family's health insurance and the little bit he can put toward his
401(k) He would love the plan I'm offering public employees.
As my brother recognizes, our plan is a good deal for government workers when
compared with what other middle class workers are paying for benefits. It would even
be a great deal for federal workers.
Nearly every state in the countryJs facing a large budget deficit, just like the federal
government. Many states are cutting billions of dollars in funding for schools and local
governments resulting in massive layoffs or massive property tax increases- or both.
In Wisconsin, we are choosing a different way. The Wisconsin way allows local
governments to balance the budget through reasonable benefit contributions. These
reasonable contributions will save local governments almost $1.5 billion.
The financial savings in our budget reforms protect 1,500 jobs in this fiscal year and
10,000 jobs over the next two years. The savings come from giving state and local
governments the tools to manage benefit costs through collective bargaining reform.
Some have questioned the need to reform collective bargaining. After all, they say, the
union bosses in Washington said publicly that their workers were ready to pay a little bit
more for their benefits. But, the truth is that as the national union bosses were saying
one thing, their locals were doing something entirely different. Over the past several
weeks, local unions across Wisconsin have pursued contracts without new pension or
health insurance contributions. Some have even pushed through pay increases.
Their actions leave one wondering how tone deaf and out of touch the union bosses are
with what's happening in the private sector. Even the president instituted a pay freeze
on government workers this year; something that he was only able to do because
federal employees enjoy fewer collective bargaining rights than Wisconsin workers do-
even with our recent reforms.
Beyond balancing budgets, our reforms give schools- as well as state and local
governments- the tools to improve their operations. We allow them to reward merit
and performance- instead of facing the barriers of collective bargaining which all too
often block innovation and reform. Because of our reforms government will become
more efficient and effective to the people.
Ultimately, our budget repair bill is about the next generation .. We are making the
difficult decisions now, so that our children don't have to make even more difficult
choices to balanc.e the budget we left them.
A lot of people have made their voices heard during this debate including the President
and the union bosses. But the middle class taxpayer who wants a government that
works for them also deserves a voice. Now they have one.
Downing, Karley - GOV
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent
To:
u.,,,_.av. March 15, 2011 4:35 PM
Subject:
No.
From: Autumn Brewington
Sent: Tuesday, March 15,
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject: Re: Fw: Here is the highlighted version
Did you see an updated draft from Crystal?
From:
To:
Date:
Subject: Fw: Here is the highlighted version
Did this come through right?
From: Schrimpf, Chris- GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 02:00 PM
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject: Here is the highlighted version
version
Imagine the outrage if government workers did not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits.
Consider the massive protests by labor leaders from all across the country.
Think I'm talking about Wisconsin? No, I'm talking about the federal government.
Contrary to what the Obama administration would lead you to believe, most federal government employees
do not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits. That means the budget reform plan we signed into
law in Wisconsin Friday is more generous than what President Obama offers federal employees.
Our budget reform plan calls for a 5.8% pension contribution from government workers, including myself, and
a 12.6% health insurance premium payment. Both are well below what middle class, private-sector workers
pay. Federal workers, however, pay an average of 28% of health insurance costs.
It's enough to make you wonder why there are no protestors circling the White House.
30
My brother is a banquet manager and occasional bartender at a hotel. He pays nearly $800 a month for his
family's health insurance and the little bit he can put toward his 401(k) He would love the plan I'm offering
public employees.
As my brother recognizes, our plan is a good deal for government workers when compared with what other
middle class workers are paying for benefits. It would even be a great deal for federal workers.
Nearly every state in the country is facing a large budget deficit, just like the federal government. Many states
are cutting billions of dollars in funding for schools and local governments resulting in massive layoffs or
massive property tax increases- or both.
In Wisconsin, we are choosing a different way. The Wisconsin way allows local governments to balance the
budget through reasonable benefit contributions. These reasonable contributions will save local governments
almost $1.5 billion.
The financial savings in our budget reforms protect 1,500 jobs in this fiscal year and 10,000 jobs over the next
two years. The savings come from giving state and local governments the tools to manage benefit costs
through collective bargaining reform.
Some have questioned the need to reform collective bargaining. After all, they say, the union bosses in
Washington said publiclythat their workers were ready to pay a little bit more for their benefits. But, the
truth is that as the national union bosses were saying one thing, their locals were doing something entirely
different. Over the past several weeks, local unions across Wisconsin have pursued contracts without new
pension or health insurance contributions. Some have even pushed through pay increases.
Their actions leave one wondering how tone deaf and out oftouch the union bosses are with what's
happening in the private sector. Even the president instituted a pay freeze on government workers this year;
something that he was only able to do because federal employees enjoy fewer collective bargaining rights
than Wisconsin workers do- even with our recent reforms.
Beyond balancing budgets, our reforms give schools- as well as state and local governments- the tools to
improve their operations. We allow them to reward merit and performance- instead of facing the barriers of
collective bargaining which all too often block innovation and reform. Because of our refo'rms government
will become more efficient and effective to the people.
Ultimately, our budget repair bill is about the next generation. We are making the difficult decisions now, so
that our children don't have to make even more difficult choices to balance the budget we left them.
A lot of people have made their voices heard during this debate including the President and the union
bosses. But the middle class taxpayer who wants a government that works for them also deserves a
voice. Now they have one.
Chris Schrimpf
Communications Director
Office of the Governor
Press Office: 608-267-7303
Email: chris.schrimpf@J,wisconsin.gov
31
Downing, Karley - GOV
From: . Schrimpf, Chris - GOY
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Is what you attached the edited version?
From: Autumn Brewington f m<liltG.
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 04:33
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOY
March 15, 2011 4:36 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Here is the highlighted version
Did you ~ e e an updated draft from Crystal?
From:
To:
Date:
Subject: Fw: Here is the highlighted version
Did this come through right?
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOY
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 02:00 PM
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOY
Subject: Here is the highlighted version
Imagine the outrage if government workers did not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits.
Consider the massive protests by labor leaders from all across the country.
Think I'm talking about Wisconsin? No, I'm talking about the federal government.
Contrary to what the Obama administration would lead you to believe, most federal government employees
do not have collective bargaining for wages and benefits. That means the budget reform plan we signed into
law in Wisconsin Friday is more generous than what President Obama offers federal employees.
Our budget reform plan calls for a 5.8% pension contribution from government workers, including myself, and
a 12.6% health insurance premium payment. Both are well below what middle class, private-sector workers
pay. Federal workers, however, pay an average of 28% of health insurance costs.
It's enough to make you wonder why there are no protestors circling the White House.
28
My brother is a banquet manager and occasional bartender at a hotel. He pays nearly $800 a month for his
family's health insurance and the little bit he can put toward his 401(k) He would love the plan I'm offering
public employees.
As my brother recognizes, our plan is a good deal for government workers when compared with what other
middle class workers are paying for benefits. It would even be a great deal for federal workers.
Nearly every state in the country is facing a large budget deficit, just like the federal government. Many states
are cutting billions of dollars in funding for schools and local governments resulting in massive layoffs or
massive property tax increases- or both.
In Wisconsin, we are choosing a different way.- The Wisconsin way allows local governments to balance the
budget through reasonable benefit contributions. These reasonable contributions will save local governments
almost $1.5 billion.
The financial savings in our budget reforms protect 1,500 jobs in this fiscal year and 10,000 jobs over the next
two years. The savings come from giving state and local governments the tools to manage benefit costs
through collective bargaining reform.
Some have questioned the need to reform collective bargaining. After all, they say, the union bosses in
Washington said publicly that their workers were ready to pay a little bit more for their benefits. But, the
truth is that as the national union bosses were saying one thing, their locals were doing something entirely
different. Over the past several weeks, local unions across Wisconsin have pursued contracts without new
pension or health insurance contributions. Some have even pushed through pay increases.
Their actions leave one wondering how tone deaf and out of touch the union bosses are with what's
happening in the private sector. Even the president instituted a pay freeze on government workers this year;
something that he was only able to do because federal employees enjoy fewer collective bargaining rights
than Wisconsin workers do- even with our recent reforms.
Beyond balancing budgets, our reforms give schools- as well as state and local governments- the tools to
improve their operations. We allow them to reward merit and performance- instead of facing the barriers of
collective bargaining which all too often block innovation and reform. Because of our reforms government
will become more efficient and effective to the people.
Ultimately, our budget repair bill is about the next generation. We are making the difficult decisions now, so
that our children don't have to make even more difficult choices to balance the budget we left them.
A lot of people have made their voices heard during this debate including the President and the union
bosses. But the middle class taxpayer who wants a government that works for them also deserves a
voice. Now they have one.
Chris Schrimpf
Communications Director
Office of the Governor
Press Office: 608-267-7303
Email: chris.schrimpf@wisconsin.gov
29
Downing, Karley - GOV
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Werwie, Cullen J - GOV
Tuesday, March 15,
Schrimpf, Chris-
release draft for tonight
Let me know what you think ofthis, ASAP if possible. I'm running it by Ryan and Keith at the same time to see
if anyone has any edits. It hink we should get it out this afternoon to try and get in the paper tomorrow.
March 15, 2011
For Immediate Release
Contact: Cullen Werwie, (608) 267-7303
Governor Walker's Budget Protects Education and Local Government Jobs
Madison-Today the nonpartisan Legislative Fiscal Bureau (LFB) released numbers confirming what Governor
Walker has been saying all along regarding the amount of savings realized from the budget repair bill.
According to LFB the savings realized from the pension reforms alone in the budget repair bill will account for
a majority of the school aid reductions in proposed 2011-13 biennial budget. When $68 million of savings is
factored in for school districts switching from the expensive WEA Trust health insurance program to the state
plan, the proportion of savings to reductions improves-and that is before an increase in the amount of
money employees pay toward their health insurance is factored in.
The main reason school aids are declining is because in the previous biennial budget, $789 million was used
from the federal stimulus to backfill general fund aid shortfalls to K-12 education. Governor Walker's budget
addresses the hole left from the use of one-time money without widespread layoffs or massive tax increases
by enacting modest pension and health insurance reforms.
Additionally, LFB' s numbers show the savings that will materialize from the pension reforms at the local levels
of government.
Below is a statement from Governor Walker commenting on LFB's release:
With the state facing a massive budget deficit, stagnant unemployment, and an ever growing government that
taxpayers can no longer afford to support, I stood up to the status quo and introduced a bold set of reforms
that improve services and control costs.
The numbers released by the Legislative Fiscal Bureau today show that the reforms contained in the budget will
avoid layoffs and protect middleclass taxpayers all across Wisconsin, in addition to the changes to collective
bargaining which will ultimately improve education.
Below is a link to the LFB document estimating these savings: http://legis.wisconsin.gov/lfb/2011-
13%20Budget/Governor/2011 03 15 Retirement%20Savings.pdf
26
###
27
Downing, Karley - GOV
From:
Sent:
To:
Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
Werwie, Cullen J -
Subject: Re: release draft for tonight
I'm not sure if stagnant unemployment is the right term. I would say unemployment that is still too high. Stagnant is a
technical term
From: Werwie, Cullen J - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, ~
To: Schrimpf, Chris- GOV;--
Subject: release draft for tonight
Let me know what you think of this, ASAP if possible. I'm running it by Ryan and Keith at the same time to see
if anyone has any edits. It hink we should get it out this afternoon to try and get in the paper tomorrow.
March 15, 2011
For Immediate Release
Contact: Cullen Werwie, (608) 267-7303
Governor Walker's Budget Protects Education and Local Government Jobs
Madison-Todaythe nonpartisan Legislative Fiscal Bureau (LFB) released numbers confirming what Governor
Walker has been saying all along regarding the amount of savings realized from the budget repair bill.
According to LFB the savings realized from the pension reforms alone in the budget repair bill will account for
a majority of the school aid reductions in proposed 2011-13 biennial budget. When $68 million of savings is
factored in for school districts switching from the expensive WEA Trust health insurance program to the state
plan, the proportion of savings to reductions improves-and that is before an increase in the amount of
money employees pay toward their health insurance is factored in.
The main reason school aids are declining is because in the previous biennial budget, $789 million was used
from the federal stimulus to backfill general fund aid shortfalls to K-12 education. Governor Walker's budget
addresses the hole left from the use of one-time money without widespread layoffs or massive tax increases
by enacting modest pension and health insurance reforms.
Additionally, LFB's numbers show the savings that will materialize from the pension reforms at the local levels
of government.
Below is a statement from Governor Walker commenting on LFB's release:
With the state facing a massive budget deficit, stagnant unemployment, and an ever growing government that
taxpayers can no longer afford to support, I stood up to the status quo and introduced a bold set of reforms
that improve services and control costs.
24
The numbers released by the Legislative Fiscal Bureau today show that the reforms contained in the budget will
avoid layoffs and protect middleclass taxpayers all across Wisconsin, in addition to the changes to collective
bargaining which will ultimately improve education.
Below is a link to the LFB document estimating these savings: http:Uiegis.wisconsin.gov/lfb/2011-
13%20Budget/Governor/2011 03 15 Retirement%20Savings.pdf
###
25
Downing, Karley - GOV
From:
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 5:09 PM
To:
Subject:
Werwie, Cullen J - GOV; Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Re: release draft for tonight
Good.
From: Werwie, Cullen J - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, ~
To: Schrimpf, Chris- GOV;--
Subject: release draft for tonight
Let me know what you think of this, ASAP if possible. I'm running it by Ryan and Keith at the same time to see
if anyone has any edits. It hink we should get it out this afternoon to try and get in the paper tomorrow.
March 15, 2011
For Immediate Release
Contact: Cullen Werwie, (608) 267-7303
Governor Walker's Budget Protects Education and Local Government Jobs
Madison-Today the nonpartisan Legislative Fiscal Bureau (LFB) released numbers confirming what Governor
Walker has been saying all along regarding the amount of savings realized from the budget repair bill.
According to LFB the savings realized from the pension reforms alone in the budget repair bill will account for
a majority of the school aid reductions in proposed 2011-13 biennial budget. When $68 million of savings is
factored in for school districts switching from the expensive WEA Trust health insurance program to the state
plan, the proportion of savings to reductions improves-and that is before an increase in the amount of
money employees pay toward their health insurance is factored in.
The main reason school aids are declining is because in the previous biennial budget, $789 million was used
from the federal stimulus to backfill general fund aid shortfalls to K-12 education. Governor Walker's budget
addresses the hole left from the use of one-time money without widespread layoffs or massive tax increases
by enacting modest pension and health insurance reforms.
Additionally, LFB's numbers show the savings that will materialize from the pension reforms at the local levels
of government.
Below is a statement from Governor Walker commenting on LFB's release:
With the state facing a massive budget deficit, stagnant unemployment, and an ever growing government that
taxpayers can no longer afford to support, I stood up to the status quo and introduced a bold set of reforms
that improve services and control costs.
22
The numbers released by the Legislative Fiscal Bureau today show that the reforms contained in the budget will
avoid layoffs and protect middleclass taxpayers all across Wisconsin, in addition to the changes to collective
bargaining which will ultimately improve education.
Below is a link to the LFB document estimating these savings: http://legis.wisconsin.gov/lfb/2011-
13%20Budget/Governor/2011 03 15 Retirement%20Savings.pdf
###
23
Downing, Karley GOV
From: Werwie, Cullen J - GOV
Sent:
To:
Tuesday, March 15, 2011 5:19 PM
Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject: RE: release draft for tonight
Got it, sending out momentarily.
Cullen Werwie
Press Secretary
Office af Governor Scott Walker
Press Office: (608} 267-7303
Email:
www. walker. wi.gov
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 5:07 PM
To: Werwie, Cullen J- GOV;--
Subject: Re: release draft
I'm not sure if stagnant unemployment is the right term. I would say unemployment that is still too high. Stagnant is a
technical term
From: Werwie, Cullen J- GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15,
To: Schrimpf, Chris -
Subject: release draft for toni'aht
Let me know what you think ofthis, ASAP if possible. I'm running it by Ryan and Keith at the same time to see
if anyone has any edits. It hink we should get it out this afternoon to try and get in the paper tomorrow.
March 15, 2011
For Immediate Release
Contact: Cullen Werwie, (608) 267-7303
Governor Walker's Budget Protects Education and local Government Jobs
Madison-Today the nonpartisan Legislative Fiscal Bureau (LFB) released numbers confirming what Governor
Walker has been saying all along regarding the amount of savings realized from the budget repair bill.
According to LFB the savings realized from the pension reforms alone in the budget repair bill will account for
a majority of the school aid reductions in proposed 2011-13 biennial budget. When $68 million of savings is
factored in for school districts switching from the expensive WEA Trust health insurance program to the state
plan, the proportion of savings to reductions improves-and that is before an increase in the amount of
money employees pay toward their health insurance is factored in.
20
The main reason school aids are declining is because in the previous biennial budget, $789 million was used
from the federal stimulus to backfill general fund aid shortfalls to K-12 education. Governor Walker's budget
addresses the hole left from the use.of one-time money without widespread layoffs or massive tax increases
by enacting modest pension and health insurance reforms.
'
Additionally, LFB's numbers show the savings that will materialize from the pension reforms at the local levels
of government.
Below is a statement from Governor Walker commenting on LFB's release:
With the state facing a massive budget deficit, stagnant unemployment, and an ever growing government that
taxpayers can no longer afford to support, I stood up to the status quo and introduced a bold set of reforms
that improve services and control costs.
The numbers released by the Legislative Fiscal Bureau today show that the reforms contained in the budget will
avoid layoffs and protect middleclass taxpayers all across Wisconsin, in addition to the changes to collective
bargaining which will ultimately improve education.
Below is a link to the LFB document estimating these savings: http:Uiegis.wisconsin.gov/lfb/2011-
13%20Budget/Governor/2011 03 15 Retirement%20Savings.pdf
###
21
Downing, Karley - GOV
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 5:23 PM
To:
Subject:
Werwie, Cullen J - GOV; Gilkes, Keith - GOV; Schutt, Eric - GOV; Murray, Ryan M - GOV
Re: release draft for tonight
Should we send out our numbers?
From: Werwie, Cullen J - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 05:18PM
To:. Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject: RE: release draft for tonight
Got it, sending out momentarily.
Cullen Werwie
Press Secretary
Office of Governor Scott Walker
Press Office: {608} 267-7303
Email:
www. walker. wi.qov
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15,
To: Werwie, Cullen J-
Subject: Re: release draft
I'm not sure if stagnant unemployment is the right term. I would say unemployment that is still too high. Stagnant is a
technical term
From: Werwie, Cullen J- GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15,
To: Schrimpf, Chris- GOV;
Subject: release draft for tnniioht
Let me know what you think ofthis, ASAP if possible. I'm running it by Ryan and Keith at the same time to see
if anyone has any edits. It hink we should get it out this afternoon to try and get in the paper tomorrow.
March 15, 2011
For Immediate Release
Contact: Cullen Werwie, (608) 267-7303
Governor Walker's Budget Protects Education and Local Government Jobs
Madison-Today the nonpartisan Legislative Fiscal Bureau (LFB) released numbers confirming what Governor
Walker has been saying all along regarding the amount of savings realized from the budget repair bill.
18
According to LFB the savings realized from the pension reforms alone in the budget repair bill will account for
a majority of the school aid reductions in proposed 2011-13 biennial budget. When $68 million of savings is
factored in for school districts switching from the expensive WEA Trust health insurance program to the state
plan, the proportion of savings to reductions improves-and that is before an increase in the amount of
money employees pay toward their health insurance is factored in.
The main reason school aids are declining is because in the previous biennial budget, $789 million was used
from the federal stimulus to backfill general fund aid shortfalls to K-12 education. Governor Walker's budget
addresses the hole left from the use of one-time money without widespread layoffs or massive tax increases
by enacting modest pension and health insurance reforms.
Additionally, LFB's numbers show the savings that will materialize from the pension reforms at the local levels
of government.
Below is a statement from Governor Walker commenting on LFB's release:
With the state facing a massive budget deficit, stagnant unemployment, and an ever growing government that
taxpayers can no longer afford to support, I stood up to the status quo and introduced a bold set of reforms
that improve services and control costs.
The numbers released by the Legislative Fiscal Bureau today show that the reforms contained in the budget will
avoid layoffs and protect middleclass taxpayers all across Wisconsin, in addition to the changes to collective
bargaining which will ultimately improve education.
Below is a link to the LFB document estimating these savings: http://legis.wisconsin.gov/lfb/2011-
13%20Budget/Governor/2011 03 15 Retirement%20Savings.pdf
###
19
Downing, Karley - GOV
From: Werwie, Cullen J - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 5:24 PM
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV; Gilkes, Keith - GOV; Schutt, Eric - GOV; Murray, Ryan M - GOV
Subject: RE: release draft for tonight
Ryan and I discussed, we're going to have a fantastic breakdown tomorrow from our budget shop that compares LFB's
numbers+ health savings. I think we should do that tomorrow. I think our general comment should get any quotes in
stories about it over the night.
Cullen Werwie
Press Secretary
Office of Governor Scott Walker
Press Office: {608) 267-7303
Email:
www. walker. wi.qov
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 5:23PM
To: Werwie, Cullen J - GOV; Gilkes, Keith - GOV; Schutt, Eric- GOV; Murray, Ryan M - GOV
Subject: Re: release draft for tonight
Should we send out our numbers?
From: Werwie, Cullen J - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 05:18 PM
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject: RE: release draft for tonight
Got it, sending out momentarily.
Cullen Werwie
Press Secretary
Office of Governor Scott Walker
Press Office: {608} 267-7303
Cullen. Werwie@ WI. Gov
www. walker. wi.qov
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011
To: Werwie, Cullen J - GOV;
Subject: Re: release draft
15
I'm not sure if stagnant unemployment is the right term. I would say unemployment that is still too high. Stagnant is a
technical term
From: Werwie, Cullen J - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 05:04PM
To: Schrimpf, Chris- G O V ~
Subject: release draft for t o ~ ~
Let me know what you think of this, ASAP if possible. I'm running it by Ryan and Keith at the same time to see
if anyone has any edits. It hink we should get it out this afternoon to try and get in the paper tomorrow.
March 15, 2011
For Immediate Release
Contact: Cullen Werwie, (608) 267-7303
Governor Walker's Budget Protects Education and Local Government Jobs
Madison-Today the nonpartisan Legislative Fiscal Bureau (LFB) released numbers confirming what Governor
Walker has been saying all along regarding the amount of savings realized from the budget repair bill.
According to LFB the savings realized from the pension reforms alone in the budget repair bill will account for
a majority of the school aid reductions in proposed 2011-13 biennial budget. When $68 million of savings is
factored in for school districts switching from the expensive WEA Trust health insurance program to the state
plan, the proportion of savings to reductions improves-and that is before an increase in the amount of
money employees pay toward their health insurance is factored in.
The main reason school aids are declining is because in the previous biennial budget, $789 million was used
from the federal stimulus to backfill general fund aid shortfalls to K-12 education. Governor Walker's budget
addresses the hole left from the use of one-time money without widespread layoffs or massive tax increases
by enacting modest pension and health insurance reforms.
Additionally, LFB's numbers show the savings that will materialize from the pension reforms at the local levels
of government.
Below is a statement from Governor Walker commenting on LFB's release:
With the state facing a massive budget deficit, stagnant unemployment, and an ever growing government that
taxpayers can no longer afford to support, I stood up to the status quo and introduced a bold set of reforms
that improve services and control costs.
The numbers released by the Legislative Fiscal Bureau today show that the reforms contained in the budget wil/
avoid layoffs and protect middleclass taxpayers all across Wisconsin, in addition to the changes to collective
bargaining which will ultimately improve education.
Below is a link to the LFB document estimating these savings: http://legis.wisconsin.gov/lfb/2011-
13%20Budget/Governor/2011 03 15 Retirement%205avings.pdf
###
16
17
Downing, Karley - GOV
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 5:27 PM
To:
Subject:
Werwie, Cullen J- GOV; Gilkes, Keith- GOV; Schutt, Eric- GOV; Murray, Ryan M- GOV
Re: release draft for tonight
Ok I haven't studied the lfb numbers only hesitation in delaying release is if the stories about lfb numbers are bad, then
it looks like we are responding to it, with stuff we created, rather than setting the record straight before the message is
established
From: Werwie, Cullen J- GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 05:23 PM
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV; Gilkes, Keith - GOV; Schutt, Eric - GOV; Murray, Ryan M - GOV
Subject: RE: release draft for tonight
Ryan and I discussed, we're going to have a fantastic breakdown tomorrow from our budget shop that compares LFB's
numbers+ health savings. I think we should do that tomorrow. I think our general comment should get any quotes in
stories about it over the night.
Cullen Werwie
Press Secretary
Office of Governor Scott Walker
Press Office: (608) 267-7303
Email:
www. walker. wi. qov
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 5:23 PM
To: Werwie, Cullen J - GOV; Gilkes, Keith - GOV; Schutt, Eric- GOV; Murray, Ryan M - GOV
Subject: Re: release draft for tonight
Should we send out our numbers?
From: Werwie, Cullen J- GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 05:18PM
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject: RE: release draft for tonight
Got it, sending out momentarily.
Cullen Werwie
Press Secretary
Office of Governor Scott Walker
Press Office: (608} 267-7303
Email: Cullen. Werwie@WI.Gov
11
www. walker. wi.gov
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2::.00jlili5ii:OI7iPIMIIf
To: Werwie, Cullen J - GOV,.
Subject: Re: release draft for tonight
I'm not sure if stagnant unemployment is the right term. I would say unemployment that is still too high. Stagnant is a
technical term
From: Werwie, Cullen J - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, ~
To: Schrimpf, Chris- GOV;--
Subject: release draft for tonight
Let me know what you think ofthis, ASAP if possible. I'm running it by Ryan and Keith at the same time to see
if anyone has any edits. It hink we should get it out this afternoon to try and get in the paper tomorrow.
March 15, 2011
For Immediate Release
Contact: Cullen Werwie, (608) 267-7303
Governor Walker's Budget Protects Education and local Government Jobs
Madison-Today the nonpartisan Legislative Fiscal Bureau (LFB) released numbers confirming what Governor
Walker has been saying all along regarding the amount of savings realized from the budget repair bill.
According to LFB the savings realized from the pension reforms alone in the budget repair bill will account for
a majority of the school aid reductions in proposed 2011-13 biennial budget. When $68 million of savings is
factored in for school districts switching from the expensive WEA Trust health insurance program to the state
plan, the proportion of savings to reductions improves-and that is before an increase in the amount of
money employees pay toward their health insurance is factored in.
The main reason school aids are declining is because in the previous biennial budget, $789 million was used
from the federal stimulus to backfill general fund aid shortfalls to K-12 education. Governor Walker's budget
addresses the hole left from the use of one-time money without widespread layoffs or massive tax increases
by enacting modest pension and health insurance reforms.
Additionally, LFB's numbers show the savings that will materialize from the pension reforms at the local levels
of government.
Below is a statement from Governor Walker commenting on LFB's release:
With the state facing a massive budget deficit, stagnant unemployment, and an ever growing government that
taxpayers can no longer afford to support, I stood up to the status quo and introduced a bold set of reforms
that improve services and control costs.
12
The numbers released by the Legislative Fiscal Bureau today show that the reforms contained in the budget will
avoid layoffs and protect middleclass taxpayers all across Wisconsin, in addition to the changes to collective
bargaining which will ultimately improve education.
Below is a link to the LFB document estimating these savings: http://legis.wisconsin.gov/lfb/2011-
13%20Budget/Governor/2011 03 15 Retirement%20Savings.pdf
###
13
Downing, Karley - GOV
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Werwie, Cullen J - GOV
Tuesday, March 15, 2011 5:34 PM
Schrimpf, Chris - GOV; Gilkes, Keith - GOV; Schutt, Eric- GOV; Murray, Ryan M - GOV
Hurlburt, Waylon - GOV
RE: release draft for tonight
My understanding is that their numbers are in line with ours, we just need to add in the health savings for a complete
analysis, which will be ready tomorrow from our budget shop.
Cullen Werwie
Press Secretary
Office of Governor Scott Walker
Press Office: {608} 267-7303
Email: Cullen. Werwie@WI.Gov
www. walker. wi.qov
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 5:27 PM
To: Werwie, Cullen J - GOV; Gilkes, Keith - GOV; Schutt, Eric - GOV; Murray, Ryan M - GOV
Subject: Re: release draft for tonight
Ok I haven't studied the lfb numbers only hesitation in delaying release is if the stories about lfb numbers are bad, then
it looks like we are responding to it, with stuff we created, rather than setting the record straight before the message is
established
From: Werwie, Cullen J - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 05:23PM
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV; Gilkes, Keith - GOV; Schutt, Eric- GOV; Murray, Ryan M - GOV
Subject: RE: release draft for tonight
Ryan and I discussed, we're going to have a fantastic breakdown tomorrow from our budget shop that compares LFB's
numbers+ health savings. I think we should do that tomorrow. I think our general comment should get any quotes in
stories about it over the night.
Cullen Werwie
Press Secretary
Office of Governor Scott Walker
Press Office: (608) 267-7303 .
Email:
www. walker. wi. qov
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 5:23PM
8
To: Werwie, Cullen J GOV; Gilkes, Keith GOV; Schutt, Eric GOV; Murray, Ryan M GOV
Subject: Re: release draft for tonight
Should we send out our numbers?
From: Werwie, Cullen J GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 05:18PM
To: Schrimpf, Chris GOV
Subject: RE: release draft for tonight
Got it, sending out momentarily.
Cullen Werwie
Press Secretary
Office of Governor Scott Walker
Press Office: (608} 267-7303
Email:
www. walker. wi.qov
From: Schrimpf, Chris GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15,
To: Werwie, Cullen J
Subject: Re: release draft for tonight
I'm not sure if stagnant unemployment is the right term. I would say unemployment that is still too high. Stagnant is a
technical term
From: Werwie, Cullen J GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15,
To: Schrimpf, Chris GOV
Subject: release draft for mn1nnr
Let me know what you think of this, ASAP if possible. I'm running it by Ryan and Keith at the same time to see
if anyone has any edits. It hink we should get it out this afternoon to try and get in the paper tomorrow.
March 15, 2011
For Immediate Release
Contact: Cullen Werwie, {608) 267-7303
Governor Walker's Budget Protects Education and Local Government Jobs
Madison-Today the nonpartisan Legislative Fiscal Bureau (LFB) released numbers confirming what Governor
Walker has been saying all along regarding the amount of savings realized from the budget repair bill.
According to LFB the savings realized from the pension reforms alone in the budget repair bill will account for
a majority ofthe school aid reductions in proposed 2011-13 biennial budget. When $68 million of savings is
factored in for school districts switching from the expensive WEA Trust health insurance program to the state
9
plan, the proportion of savings to reductions improves-and that is before an increase in the amount of
money employees pay toward their health insurance is factored in.
The main reason school aids are declining is because in the previous biennial budget, $789 million was used
from the federal stimulus to backfill general fund aid shortfalls to K-12 education. Governor Walker's budget
addresses the hole left from the use of one-time money without widespread layoffs or massive tax increases
by enacting modest pension and health insurance reforms.
Additionally, LFB's numbers show the savings that will materialize from the pension reforms at the local levels
of government.
Below is a statement from Governor Walker commenting on LFB's release:
With the state facing a massive budget deficit, stagnant unemployment, and an ever growing government that
taxpayers can no longer afford to support, I stood up to the status quo and introduced a bold set of reforms
that improve services and control costs.
The numbers released by the Legislative Fiscal Bureau today show that the reforms contained in the budget will
avoid layoffs and protect middleclass taxpayers all across Wisconsin, in addition to the changes to collective
bargaining which will ultimately improve education.
Below is a link to the LFB document estimating these savings: http://legis.wisccinsin.gov/lfb/2011-
13%20Budget/Governor/2011 03 15 Retirement%20Savings.pdf
###
10
Downing, Karley - GOV
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 5:39 PM
To:
Cc:
Werwie, Cullen J - GOV; Gilkes, Keith - GOV; Schutt, Eric - GOV; Murray, Ryan M - GOV
Hurlburt, Waylon - GOV
Subject: Re: release draft for tonight
Ok. Trust you guys on what the numbers say
From: Werwie, Cullen J- GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 05:34 PM
To: Schrimpf, Chris- GOV; Gilkes, Keith - GOV; Schutt, Eric- GOV; Murray, Ryan M - GOV
Cc: Hurlburt, Waylon - GOV
Subject: RE: release draft for tonight
My understanding is that their numbers are in line with ours, we just need to add in the health savings for a complete
analysis, which will be ready tomorrow from our budget shop.
Cullen Werwie
Press Secretary
Office of Governor Scott Walker
Press Office: (608} 267-7303
Email: Cullen. Werwie@WI.Gov
www. walker. wi.qov
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 5:27 PM
To: Werwie, Cullen J - GOV; Gilkes, Keith - GOV; Schutt, Eric - GOV; Murray, Ryan M - GOV
Subject: Re: release draft for tonight
Ok I haven't studied the lfb numbers only hesitation in delaying release is if the stories about lfb numbers are bad, then
it looks like we are responding to it, with stuff we created, rather than setting the record straight before the message is
established
From: Werwie, Cullen J- GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 05:23 PM
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV; Gilkes, Keith - GOV; Schutt, Eric- GOV; Murray, Ryan M - GOV
Subject: RE: release draft for tonight
Ryan and I discussed, we're going to have a fantastic breakdown tomorrow from our budget shop that compares LFB's
numbers+ health savings. I think we should do that tomorrow. I think our general comment should get any quotes in
stories about it o v ~ r the night.
Cullen Werwie
Press Secretary
Office of Governor Scott Walker
Press Office: (608} 267-7303
5
www. walker. wi.qov
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 5:23 PM
To: Werwie, Cullen J - GOV; Gilkes, Keith - GOV; Schutt, Eric - GOV; Murray, Ryan M - GOV
Subject: Re: release draft for tonight
Should we send out our numbers?
From: Werwie, Cullen J- GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 05:18 PM
To: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Subject: RE: release draft for tonight
Got it, sending out momentarily.
Cullen Werwie
Press Secretary
Office of Governor Scott Walker
Press Office: {608} 267-7303
Email:
www. walker. wi.qov
From: Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011
To: Werwie, Cullen J - GOV;
Subject: Re: release draft for tnniinht
I'm not sure if stagnant unemployment is the right term. I would say unemployment that is still too high. Stagnant is a
technical term
From: Werwie, Cullen J- GOV
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, ~
To: Schrimpf, Chris- GOV;--
Subject: release draft for tonight
Let me know what you think of this, ASAP if possible. I'm running it by Ryan and Keith at the same time to see
if anyone has any edits. It hink we should get it out this afternoon to try and get in the paper tomorrow.
March 15, 2011
For Immediate Release
Contact: Cullen Werwie, (608) 267-7303
Governor Walker's Budget Protects Education and Local Government Jobs
6
Madison-Today the nonpartisan Legislative Fiscal Bureau (LFB) released numbers confirming what Governor
Walker has been saying all along regarding the amount of savings realized from the budget repair bill.
According to LFB the savings realized from the pension reforms alone in the budget repair bill will account for
a majority of the school aid reductions in proposed 2011-13 biennial budget. When $68 million of savings is
factored in for school districts switching from the expensive WEA Trust health insurance program to the state
plan, the proportion of savings to reductions improves-and that is before an increase in the amount of
money employees pay toward their health insurance is factored in.
The main reason school aids are declining is because in the previous biennial budget, $789 million was used
from the federal stimulus to backfill general fund aid shortfalls to K-12 education. Governor Walker's budget
addresses the hole left from the use of one-time money without widespread layoffs or massive tax increases
by enacting modest pension and health insurance reforms.
Additionally, LFB's numbers show the savings that will materialize from the pension reforms at the local levels
of government.
Below is a statement from Governor Walker commenting on LFB's release:
With the state facing a massive budget deficit, stagnant unemployment, and an ever growing government that
taxpayers can no longer afford to support, I stood up to the status quo and introduced a bold set of reforms
that improve services and control costs.
The numbers released by the Legislative Fiscal Bureau today show that the reforms contained in the budget will
avoid layoffs and protect midd/eclass taxpayers all across Wisconsin, in addition to the changes to collective
bargaining which will ultimately improve education.
Below is a link to the LFB document estimating these savings: http://legis.wisconsin.gov/lfb/2011-
13%20Budget/Governor/2011 03 15 Retirement%20Savings.pdf
###
7
Downing, Karley - GOV
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Hurlburt, Waylon - GOV
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 7:53 AM
Werwie, Cullen J - GOV; Schrimpf, Chris - GOV
Murray, Ryan M - GOV; Schutt, Eric- GOV; Hogan, Pat- GOV
Madison City and Schools Could Reduce Property Taxes due to Budget Repair! If they
actually wanted to.
http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/local/education/local schools/article 9fdab28a-4f80-
ll e0-bdc9-001 cc4c002eO.html
The Madison School District is positioned to reduce property taxes next year because of proposed reductions in state
funding and concessions from its employee unions, a district official said Tuesday.
http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/local/govt-and-po\itics/article d04b3a58-4f39-11 e0-9fc6-
001 cc4c002eO.html
Under the AFSCME a g r e e m e n ~ the city would save a net $2.8 million in 2012. If other city unions made similar deals, the
city would save a net $9.8 million next year, Cieslewicz said. Savings from nonunion employees in Walker's repair bill
provide $2.2 million in 2012.
The tentative deal with AFSCME commits both sides to work together to avoid layoffs.
The city, Cieslewicz said, stands to lose about $11 million in state aid in 2012, and needs another $10 million to $20
million just to continue existing services. Madison will try to use cuts, efficiencies and other revenues to close the rest of
the 2012 budget gap, the mayor said, adding it's too early for details.
Waylon Hurlburt
Senior Policy Advisor
The Office of Governor Scott Walker
State of iisconsin
(608)266-9709
4
Downing, Karley - GOV
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
DWD MB Communications Office
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 8:59AM
Barroilhet, Dan - DWD; Bartol, Fred - DWD; Baumbach, Scott C - DWD; Beckett, Laura L -
DWD; Berge, Sharon - DWD; Bernstein, Howard I - DWD; Black- Radloff, Rita - DWD;
Bolles, John - DWD; Brockmiller, William - DWD; Crary, Cathy- DWD; Denis, Gary J -
DWD; Dipko, John A - DWD; Falk, Elizabeth C - DWD; Fosdick, Anna - DWD; Gerrits,
Karen - DWD; Grant, Ken G - DWD; Grosso, Eric- DWD; Hodek, Scott A- DWD; Holt,
Deb - DWD; Jones, Richard - DWD; Kikkert, Becky - GOV; Lied!, Kimberly - GOV; Lingard,
Sue - DWD; Maxwell, Georgia E - DWD; McDonald, Scott- DWD; Michels, Thomas A -
DWD; Morgan, Karen P - DWD; Natera, Ramon V - DWD; OBrien, Christopher D - DWD;'
O'Brien, Pamela - DWD; Perez, Manuel - DWD; Phillips, Amelia - DWD; Preysz, Linda -
DWD; Reid, Andrea - DWD; Reynolds, Dianne- DWD; Richard, JoAnna - DWD; Rodgers-
Rhyme, Anne M - DWD; Sachse, Jeff A- DWD; Schmalle, Verlynn C - DWD; Schrimpf,
Chris - GOV; Shutes, David L- DWD; Solomon, Brian - DWD; Spurlin, Dennis A - DWD;
Thompson, Heather- DWD; Udalova, Victoria M - DWD; Vue, Mai Zong - DCF; Weber,
Sue- DWD; Werwie, Cullen J - GOV; Westbury, John R- DWD; Westfall, Grant - DWD;
Williamson, Linda - DWD; Winters, Dennis K- DWD; Wisnewski, Jerry- DWD; Wolfe,
Brian M - DWD; Wurl, Mark W - DWD
Articles from CustomScoop, Wednesday 3.16.11
http://www .isonline.com/business/1180 14939 .html
Quad/Graphics to close Mount Morris, Ill., plant
By John Schmid of the Journal Sentinel, March 15, 2011 IC12l Comments
Quad/Graphics Inc., which became the nation's second-largest commercial printer through an acquisition last year, on
Tuesday announced the closure of another of its non-Wisconsin printing plants. The closure at the Mount Morris, Ill.,
facility is not a surprise. As it reported earnings last week, Sussex-based Quad/Graphics outlined measures to integrate
struggling Canadian rival World Color Press Inc., which it acquired last year. Quad noted that it's carrying out the
integration at a time when the global commercial printing industry is beset by overcapacity and many publishers are
opening new digital channels, compelling Quad to close North American printing facilities outside Wisconsin as well as
World Color's former headquarters in Montreal. It has cut employment by 3,000 employees to date, although none of the
plant closures were in Wisconsin.
http://www.jsonline.com/business/118055369.html
Crisis in Japan revives debate over nuclear power in Wisconsin
State legislators disagree over whether to lift moratorium
By Thomas Content of the Journal Sentinel March 15, 2011 IC 45) Comments
Japan's nuclear crisis has brought new urgency to the debate over nuclear power- a debate that heated up Tuesday in
Wisconsin when Democrats and Republicans disputed whether the state's long-standing moratorium on nuclear plant
construction should be lifted. State Rep. Mark Honadel (R-South Milwaukee) said he still plans to co-sponsor a bill this
year that would overturn the moratorium on new reactors, which was enacted in 1983 in the aftermath of the 1979 Three
Mile Island nuclear accident in Pennsylvania.
http: //host. mad is on .com/wsilnews/locallgovt-and-oolitics/article 967b1ea2-4f8d-11e0-8fcb-OO 1cc4c002e0. html
Amid changes in bargaining and benefits, public workers weigh whether to retire
MARK PITSCH 1 mpitsch@madison.com 1608-252-61451 Posted: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 4:45am
Across Wisconsin, government and school district employees are weighing whether to continue working or get out of
public sector employment in light of a new law limiting collective bargaining and employee benefits. Some retired even
before Republican Gov. Scott Walker took office, anticipating changes in employee benefits. others began rushing to do
so after Walker last month unveiled his plan to end most collective bargaining for public workers and require them to pay
more of their health insurance and pension costs, a proposal he signed into law last week.
1
'
- - -- - --------- - -------- -- - - -------------- --- ---------- ------------- .....
CustomScoop
Clip Report
' ............
I wanted to draw your attention to these articles that appeared in my CustomScoop online news result report.
Workers' corilR lfllorkshCJQ offen!cl . ,. /< >
. .' ... , .' ','',''.' ... , ..... .. ,.', . .; <.
Source: Wausau Daily Herald (WI) 21200
Indexed At: 03/16/2011 5:30AM
Keywords: Worker's Compensation (2)
Abstract: .. who want to learn how mistakes in their workers' compensation plans might be costing
them money. Judy Jacobs of Camp-Save, which is a part of ...
witlker'grogoses bllildin!l groject budget > < . '. .' . , .. >> ..,
Source: Appleton Post-Gazette & Post Crescent.com (WI) 52000
.
1
Indexed At: 03/16/20114:32 AM
Keywords: Governor Scott Walker (9)
I
Abstra'ct: ... any custody issues and ends ... - 8:48am Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker proposes 1.1
billion building project budget MADISON Gov. Scott Walker is proposing spending 1.1 billion
on building projects in Wisconsin oVer the next two years, ...
Article also appeared:
Examiner.com, Green Bay
11: th'llfwlllk:er .did llottake ,, ... ,,, .. , ..' ., .. ' . , , ,., . ' ..'' .. '., . ,,........ . ......
I
Source: Milwaukee Shepherd Express Metro (WI) 62000
Indexed At: 03/16/2011 4:29AM
Keywords: Unemployment Insurance OR unemployment benefits (1)
Abstract: ... broken record)- income taxes, corporate taxes, property taxes
1
unemployment insurance-
everything that funds the government comes from business. Everything that the government
redistributes comes .
.
< > , > i > < <....
Source: Eau Claire Leader-Telegram (WI) 26200 [Registration Required]
Indexed At: 03/16/2011 2:07AM
Keywords: Jobiess (1)
Abstract: ... slow" in describing the progress madelowering the nation's jobless rate. That's a reflection of
a nearlyfull percentage point drop In just three months - ...
waik:e'FtisitsWaysau; work inMlldiso.1 VideCJ include'd

.
Byline: Anna Carrera bio
Source: WAOW-ABC 9-Wausau (WI) N/A
Indexed At: 03/15/2011 7:37PM
Keywords: Governor Scott Walker (9)
Abstract: ... Wausau, discusses work In Madison WAUSAU (WAOW) - Governor Scott Walker returns to
central Wisconsin to visit with the people he calls the working middle class ...
Whose.'fair share'? ... . .

< .. i . . . ......... . << ...
..... .
' .....
. .
Source: Eau Claire Leader-Telegram (WI) 26200 [Registration Required]
Indexed At: 03/15/2011 5:11PM
Keywords: Worker's Compensation (1)
4hc:.tr::..rt! hie: rnnrPrnk with f:=trf"<:: f:=trt-c: in \A/ic:rnnc:in uunrk,::orc:.
1

'----- ---- "" "' '-- ------ - ... ........ ------------ --- --- '''" ------ ------------- ... . ...... -- -- -- -- ---- " ... - ----------------
2
Byline: ANDREW G. BIGGS & JAS
Source: Janesville Gazette (WI) 21900 [Registration Required]
Indexed At: 03/15/2011 3:49PM
Keywords: Unemployment Insurance OR unemployment benefits (1)
Abstract: ,',, during which time the worker must subsist on unemployment benefits. We can put a
number on this. Assuming that Wisconsin workers would have the ...
3
Downing, Karley - GOV
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Werwie, Cullen J - GOV
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 5:40 PM
Schrimpf, Chris - GOV; Murray, Ryan M - GOV
FW:QNA
Can someone just respond to him directly on background on this topic on his blue edits?
Cullen Werwie
Press Secretary
Office of Governor Scott Walker
Press Office: {608) 267-7303
Email:
www. walker. wi.qov
From: Mark Pitsch
Sent: Wednesday, March
To: Werwie, Cullen J - GOV
Subject: RE: QNA
OK, quick follow ups in blue below. If there's a person I could chat with even on background it would be helpful just to be
able to clarify these couple of things.
From: Werwie, Cullen J - GOV [maflto:Cullen.Werwie@wisconsin.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 5:10PM
To: Mark Pitsch
Subject: RE: QNA
Shoot me an email, I'm going to be heading out and will need to forward it along to another staffer to review.
Cullen Werwie
Press Secretary
Office of Governor Scott Walker
Press Office: {608} 267-7303
Email: Cullen. Werwie@WI.Gov
www.walker. wi.qov
From: Mark Pitsch
Sent: Wednesday, March 16,
To: Werwie, Cullen J - GOV
Subject: RE: QNA
Thanks. Let me call you if I have a question or two.
163
From: Werwie, Cullen J - GOV [mailto:Cullen.Werwie@wisconsin.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 5:08PM
To: Mark Pitsch
Subject: RE: QNA
Mark, my edits are below, if you want to add me as a source as well that is OK.
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING LAW
IMPACT ON PUBLIC WORKERS QNA
GENERAL/COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
Q: Do state and local government employees and teachers currently have contracts in place?
A: Some do. Some are working under extensions of previous contracts.
Q: What happens to bargaining agreements when current extensions expire?
A: All provisions other than dues, health insurance premium and pension deductions will remain in effect until June 30
or until a new statewide pay plan is approved by the Joint Committee on Employment Relations. Local agreements will
remain in effect through the length of their contracts. Just want to make sure: When Madison, for example, approves a
contract through 2013, it's in effect in its entirety until the contract expires whether or not the unions have agreed to health
insurance premium and pension deductions as proposed by the governor. Locals would be barred from collecting dues
through paychecks.
Q: When will union dues stop being removed from paychecks?
A: It depends. Effective April 21, payroll will no longer be deducting union dues from state employees'
paychecks. However, UW-Madison says that for classified employees it begins April 21 and for teaching/project
assistants it begins April 29. Do we know when this will go into effect for local governments?
COMPENSATION
Q: What about other compensation such as sick leave, supplemental pay, vacation time?
A: At the state level, those elements will be included in the 2011-13 state compensation plan, which is not yet
developed. At the local level, employers will have discretion over them.
Q: Does the bill allow for the possibility of merit pay increases?
A: Yes.
RETIREMENT
Q: Will retirement contributions change?
A: Yes. In 2011, elected officials and executive employees will pay 6.65 percent of their earnings. Other employees will
pay 5.8 percent. The percentages may change yearly. The effective date is expected to be as soon after March 27 as
administratively possible.
Q: Will the contributions be taxable?
A: Yes. Lotta questions in the newsroom on this: 401(k) contributions are done pre-tax. Does it mean they're taxable once
a person withdraws them or are they taxed as income as the money is earned and then deposited to the retirement
account?
Q: How are limited term employees affected?
A: For those LTE's who currently have a pension through the WRS, they will be required to make contributions similar to
all other employees. How about L TEs not currently in the system? Will new L TE hires not be able to participate?
164
HEALTH INSURANCE
Q: Will monthly health insurance premiums increase?
A: Yes. For most employees, single rates will increase $53 to $62 per month for unionized employees and slightly less
than that for non-unionized employees. Family rates would increase between $130 and $155 monthly for most
employees.
Q: When will these increases go into effect?
A: The estimated start date is for paychecks dated April21. (CORRECT, or do you have a more updated estimate?)
Q: How are limited term employees affected?
A: For those LTE's who currently have a health insurance coverage through the state, they will be required to make
contributions similar to all other employees. How about LTEs not currently in the system? Will new LTE hires not be able
to participate?
For additional information, go to http://oser.state.wi.us/docview.asp?docid-7209
Source: Office of State Employment Relations
From: Mark Pitsch rm,,iltrl'l
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011
To: Werwie, Cullen J - GOV
Subject: QNA
Cullen:
Here is the QNA language as it stands. It's based on the document OSER posted on its website
and updated March 9. No updates have been made after the bill was signed. I decided just to send
you the parts that I think need clarification.
Mark
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING LAW
IMP ACT ON PUBLIC WORKERS QNA
GENERAL/COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
Q: Do state and local government employees and teachers currently have contracts in place?
A: Some do. Some are working under extensions of previous contracts. (CORRECT that some
state unions working under extensions?)
Q: What happens to bargaining agreements when current extensions expire?
A: All provisions other than dues, health insurance premium and pension deductions will remain
in effect until June 30 or until a new statewide pay plan is approved by the Joint Committee on
165
Employment Relations. Local agreements will remam in effect through the length of their
contracts. (CORRECT?)
Q: When will union dues stop being removed from paychecks?
A: It depends. UW-Madison says that for classified employees it begins April 21 and for
teaching/project assistants it begins April29. (UNCLEAR when it will take place for state and local
workers based on OSER website document.)
COMPENSATION
Q: What about other compensation such as sick leave, supplemental pay, vacation time?
A: At the state level, those elements will be included in the 2011-13 state compensation plan,
which is not yet developed. At the local level, employers will have discretion over them.
(CORRECT to say local employers to have discretion over these benefits?)
Q: Does the bill allow for the possibility of merit pay increases?
A: Yes. (CORRECT? I interpreted Discretionary Compensation Adjustments to mean merit pay.)
RETIREMENT
Q: Will retirement contributions change?
A: Yes. In 2011, elected officials and executive employees will pay 6.65 percent of their earnings.
Other employees will pay 5.8 percent. The percentages may change yearly. The effective date is
expected to be as soon after March 27 as administratively possible. (CORRECT? Is there a more
precise date yet, now that the law has been signed?)
Q: Will the contributions be taxable?
A: Yes. (CORRECT. Just want to make sure of this. Contributions to 401(k)s are not taxable.)
Q: How are limited term employees affected?
A: (NO GUIDANCE from OSER here.)
HEALTH INSURANCE
Q: Will monthly health insurance premiums increase?
A: Yes. For most employees, single rates will increase $53 to $62 per month for unionized
employees and slightly less than that for non-unionized employees. Family rates would increase
between $130 and $155 monthly for most employees. (CORRECT to say 'most' employees?)
Q: When will these increases go into effect?
A: The estimated start date is for paychecks dated April21. (CORRECT, or do you have a more
updated estimate?)
Q: How are limited term employees affected?
A: (NO GUIDANCE from OSER on this.)
166
For additional information, go to http://oser.state.wi.us/docview.asp?docid=7209
Source: Office of State Employment Relations
Mark Pitsch
Follow me on Twitter @markpitsch
167

You might also like