Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lectures 12-13 (Compatibility Mode)
Lectures 12-13 (Compatibility Mode)
Lectures 12-13 (Compatibility Mode)
CHAPTER
Inflation
30
Distinguish between inflation and a one-time rise in the price level and explain how demand-pull inflation and cost-push inflation arise Explain the quantity theory of money Describe the effects of inflation Explain the short-run and long-run relationships between inflation and unemployment
Inflation is a process in which the price level is rising and money is losing value. p , p Inflation is a rise in the price level, not in the price of a particular commodity. And inflation is an ongoing process, not a one-time jump in the price level.
(P1 - P0) P0
100
Inflation can result from either an increase in aggregate demand or a decrease in aggregate supply and be
Demand-pull inflation is an inflation that results from an initial increase in aggregate demand. p y g y Demand-pull inflation may begin with any factor that increases aggregate demand, such as: 1 Increase in the quantity of money 2 Increase in government expenditure 3 Increase in exports
7/9/2010
7/9/2010
Aggregate Demand Response The initial increase in costs creates a one-time rise in the price level, not inflation. To create inflation, aggregate demand must increase.
The Quantity Theory of Money The quantity theory of money is the proposition that, in q y y y p p , the long run, an increase in the quantity of money brings an equal percentage increase in the price level. The quantity theory of money is based on the velocity of circulation and the equation of exchange.
7/9/2010
V = PY/M or MV = PY V in this equation means the number of times money supply (M) needs to change hands in a year in order to support transactions of final goods and services only. V here refers to income velocity
Pearson Education 2008
V = PT/M or MV = PT Where T refers to all kinds of transactions made in an economy. V here refers to transaction velocity.
Pearson Education 2008
MV = PY
The quantity theory assumes that velocity and potential GDP are not affected by the quantity of money So in the money. equation:
P = (V/Y)M
(V/Y) is constant and a change in M brings a proportionate change in P.
7/9/2010
Slide 26
If we want less of one evil, we must have more of the other evil. Thats the trade-off. Empirically, this trade-off was first demonstrated by Prof. A.W Phillips.
0 un
Phillips Curve
Slide 27
Slide 28
Does it mean that the govt can achieve a low level of unemployment - even below the natural rate - simply by accepting a higher rate of inflation? The existence of the Phillips curve seems to suggest, yes.
But further analysis showed that there is a problem - if govt tried to hold unemployment below the natural rate rate, inflation may accelerate i.e. we may have to accept ever increasing rate of inflation.
Slide 29
Slide 30
7/9/2010
PC0
Slide 31
Slide 32
Central bank increases money supply, price level P goes up. If workers were not expecting this inflation, then they dont ask for higher W. Real wage W/P falls and unemployment goes down.
Suppose we now move to u1, with inflation 1. If the economy stayed there then there is no problem - govts there, govt s objective I achieved.
Slide 33
Slide 34
But the economy will not stay there for long, because workers will eventually adjust their wage demand. Initially, they were used to zero inflation (when the economy was at un). So, they expected future prices to be the same as current prices: Pe = P.
On that expectation, they were happy with a W that met their target real wage W/Pe. But now that there is positive inflation, they will soon discover that P > Pe, and real wage is falling.
Slide 35
Slide 36
7/9/2010
Suppose 1 = 5%. P is rising by 5 per cent every year. So, with given W, real wage will be falling by 5 per cent every year. Surely, workers will not tolerate this for long.
Soon they will demand 5% rise in W every year. Once that happens, real wage will go back to the original level and unemployment will go back to the original level Un.
Slide 37
Slide 38
This return to the original level of unemployment can be represented by a shift in the Phillips curve. The original Phillips curve PC0 - the one that goes through Un - was based on the expectation of zero inflation.
As long as workers are expecting zero inflation, govt can move to any point on PC0, by creating inflation. Thus with inflation rate 1, govt can achieve unemployment rate u1.
Slide 39
Slide 40
But as soon as workers begin to expect 1 to continue in the future, they will revise their wage demand accordingly, and unemployment will go back to un. Now we have a new Phillips curve PC1, which is based on expected inflation 1.
1
0 u1 un PC1 PC0 u
Slide 41
Slide 42
7/9/2010
PC1 will be to the right of PC0. With this new curve, the original unemployment rate un will be achieved at the inflation rate 1.
Thus, govt. will be defeated in its objective of reducing p y , y unemployment. In fact, the only result will be some inflation, where there was none before. If govt is desperate, it can still try to reduce unemployment, by raising inflation even higher.
Slide 43
Slide 44
Thus, it may choose to have 2, which on the basis of PC1, will give unemployment rate U1. That is, unemployment will come down from Un to the lower level u1, where govt wanted it to be in first place.
Why will unemployment come down? The same answer as before: prices are higher than what the workers expect.
Slide 45
Slide 46
They are now expecting inflation 1 and their W have been adjusted accordingly. If actual inflation is 2 (> 1), then their real wage will fall, so firms will hire more labour and unemployment will fall.
But the problem is, if inflation persists at the rate 2, then workers will soon begin to expect it. They will then raise W accordingly, real wage will go back to the original level, and unemployment will go back to un. Phillips curve will shift again.
Slide 47
Slide 48
7/9/2010
Phillips curve analysis leads to a number of important policy conclusions. (1) Unemployment can be reduced below Un through higher inflation, but only temporarily - only so long as workers dont expect the new rate of inflation.
PC2 PC1 PC0
1
0 u1 un u
Slide 49
Slide 50
That is, govt will have to surprise the workers by creating higher inflation. But if the new rate of inflation persists, then surprise will eventually disappear.
Workers will then readjust their W and unemployment will come back to Un. So it is only in the short run that there is trade-off between inflation and unemployment; there is no tradeoff in the long run.
Slide 51
Slide 52
The Long-run Phillips Curve PC0, PC1, etc. are short run Phillips curves. The long run Philli curve i vertical - whatever th i fl ti rate, Phillips is ti l h t the inflation t unemployment will revert to un in the long run. The long-run Phillips curve shows the relationship between i fl i and unemployment when the actual b inflation d l h h l inflation rate equals the expected inflation rate.
Slide 53
7/9/2010
(2) The only way demand management policy can keep unemployment permanently below un is by keeping on raising the inflation rate for ever - by allowing a permanently accelerating inflation.
u u1 un PC1 PC0 PC2
1
0
Slide 55
Slide 56
Thus, if govt wants u1, then it will have to keep on raising the rate of inflation first from zero to 1,and then to 2, and so on. This is true for any other rate of unemployment less than un.
(3) If government wants to bring unemployment down permanently, the best way is to reduce the natural rate of unemployment itself. This will req ire s ppl side policies i e the policies ill require supply i.e., that work on the supply side of the labour market e.g., removing the labor market rigidities
Slide 57
Slide 58
Labour market rigidities: Labour market regulation Minimum wage legislation Language Lang age barrier Discrimination
Slide 59
10