Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2012 Markt 006 European Retail Action Plan en
2012 Markt 006 European Retail Action Plan en
2012 Markt 006 European Retail Action Plan en
TITLE OF THE INITIATIVE TYPE OF INITIATIVE LEAD DG RESPONSIBLE UNIT EXPECTED DATE OF ADOPTION VERSION OF ROADMAP
CWP
x Non-CWP
This indicative roadmap is provided for information purposes only and is subject to change. It does not prejudge the final decision of the Commission on whether this initiative will be pursued or on its final content and structure.
What are the main problems which this initiative will address? The Action Plan will set up a list of actions that would help the Retail Sector achieve its full potential, and make its full contribution to the EU 2020 Growth Strategy. The advantage in developing such a comprehensive Action Plan instead of proposing separate initiatives is that it will ensure a coordinated and systemic approach to solving the problems that the Retail Sector is facing. This holistic approach was used in the RMM Report and was praised, including by the EP in its report which calls on the Commission to reinforce cross-policy coordination and take a holistic, long-term approach to the Retail Sector. More specifically, the following issues would need to be addressed in the Action Plan given that they were identified as problems by the EP and the RMM Report: - Lack of enforcement of the principle of free movement of goods and the existence of important price differences across the EU. - Divergences and lack of proper enforcement of national rules on unfair practices between businesses. - Lack of efficiency and coordination of land planning systems affecting accessibility of retail outlets for citizens and establishment of retailers. - Lack of development of the e-commerce. - Lack of transparency combined with a proliferation of quality control systems and difficulties in their crossborder use. - Insufficient provision of independent information services and commercial communications on retail offers including on social and environmental performances of retailers. - Lack of integration of environmental costs in the supply chain and lack of a common assessment and labelling
system based on the product's whole life cycle. - Differences in working conditions caused by divergent labour laws and collective agreements, preventing retailers from using their business models across the EU and putting further pressure on wage costs. Insufficient enforcement of national labour laws and rules tackling informal economy. Mismatch between skill needs and skills of the staff in the retail sector given the increasing reliance on ICT in the sector. Who will be affected by it? The Action Plan will outline a number of problems identified in the RMM Report and in the EP Report and will propose actions to address these problems together within a suggested timeline. Therefore, the Action Plan itself will not directly affect stakeholders at this stage. However, the particular actions to be proposed by the Action Plan may affect various stakeholders (farmers, producers, suppliers, suppliers, retailers, consumers, etc.) once introduced. Thus, proper Impact Assessment would need to be carried out for any such actions before they are launched. (i) Is EU action justified on grounds of subsidiarity? (ii) Why can Member States not achieve the objectives of the proposed action sufficiently by themselves? (Necessity Test) (iii) Can the EU achieve the objectives better? (Test of EU Value Added) The adoption of a European Retail Action Plan at a European level is justified by the need to ensure consistency in the treatment of the problems identified in the Retail Sector, as well as to create a level playing field for the companies active in this sector. Many companies in the Retail Sector and in the whole supply chain are operating at European level, and a number of the problems identified in the RMM Report and the EP Report stem from a lack of coordination and convergence of the applicable legislations. A European Retail Action Plan is therefore the only way to overcome existing barriers to the free movement of goods, services and the freedom of establishment, as well as to ensure convergence and a level playing field for all retailers within the EU.
C. Options
(i) What are the policy options being considered? (ii) What legislative or 'soft law' instruments could be considered? (iii) How do the options respect the proportionality principle? The first and preferred policy option considered is the adoption of a Communication that would present the European Retail Action Plan. An alternative approach could be to address the problems identified independently, without a dedicated framework involving an inter-service taskforce and without a pre-defined timeline. The European Retail Action Plan itself would be a Communication. However, the initiatives contained in the Action Plan might be of different natures: legislative proposals, communications, expert groups, studies, etc. The initiatives contained in the Action Plan will be subject to their own assessments as regards the options available.
Could any or all of the options have significant impacts on (i) simplification, (ii) administrative burden and (iii) on relations with other countries, (iv) implementation arrangements? And (v) could any be difficult to transpose for certain Member States? N/A (i) Will an IA be carried out for this initiative and/or possible follow-up initiatives? (ii) When will the IA work start? (iii) When will you set up the IA Steering Group and how often will it meet? (iv) What DGs will be invited? No Impact Assessment will be carried out for this Action Plan but specific impact assessments might need to be carried out for the legislative initiatives that could be announced. (i) Is any of options likely to have impacts on the EU budget above 5m? (ii) If so, will this IA serve also as an ex-ante evaluation, as required by the Financial regulation? If not, provide information about the timing of the ex-ante evaluation. N/A
Implementation plan Is an IP foreseen for legislative instruments? If so, please provide details. If not, explain why.
N/A
- Innovation Union - A Digital Agenda for Europe - Resource efficient Europe - An agenda for new skills and jobs