Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rps Aff Supplement - Dunn
Rps Aff Supplement - Dunn
Rps Aff Supplement - Dunn
Dunn/Gordon/Lazarevic 1
FEASIBILITY ....................................................................................................................2
RPS/TAX CREDITS SOLVE- SOLAR AND WARMING.................................................2
RPS/TAX CREDITS K 2 RENEWABLE INVESTMENT.................................................3
RPS/TAX CREDITS SOLVE..............................................................................................4
RPS FEASIBLE- SOLVES COMP.....................................................................................5
RPS FEASIBLE- SOLVES MARKET................................................................................6
RPS FEASIBLE- SOLVES WARMING.............................................................................7
RPS FEASIBLE- SOLVES NAT GAS................................................................................8
RPS FEASIBLE- TAX CREDITS KEY..............................................................................9
WARMING ADVANTAGE...............................................................................................10
RPS SOLVES WARMING................................................................................................10
RPS SOLVES WARMING................................................................................................11
RPS SOLVES WARMING................................................................................................12
RPS SOLVES WARMING, NAT GAS, ELEC PRICES...................................................13
AT: ECON DA...................................................................................................................14
L/T- RPS GROWTH......................................................................................................14
L/T- RPS LOWERS ELEC PRICES.................................................................................15
L/T- RPS SOLVES MANUFACTURING.........................................................................16
L/T- LOWER CONSUMER COSTS, INC ECON............................................................17
NO LINK-RPS DN INC PRICES.....................................................................................18
AT: STATES CP.................................................................................................................19
AT: STATES CP.................................................................................................................20
Gonzaga Debate Institute rps aff supplement
Dunn/Gordon/Lazarevic 2
FEASIBILITY
RPS/TAX CREDITS SOLVE- SOLAR AND WARMING
Solar power is feasible and can solve global warming-a national RPS and extension of tax
credits are key
Greenwire in 2k8 (solar power: report touts potential of large-scale projects, May 9, LN)
An advocacy group issued a report yesterday touting the potential of large-scale solar power
plants to supply significant baseload electric power without greenhouse gas emissions and urging
policymakers to craft renewable power standards and extend tax incentives to help spur
development. The Environment America report extols the potential of concentrating solar power
plants (CSP), which employ large arrays of mirrors or lenses that focus sunlight to produce heat
that powers electric generators. "If we are going to get serious about fighting global warming and
addressing our nation's energy woes, solar energy must be part of the solution," said Anna
Aurilio, director of the group's Washington office. CSP technology, which is less known than
photovoltaics, is not new, but it is experiencing a U.S. resurgence after a period of dormancy
(Greenwire, Sept. 21, 2007). Acciona's 64 megawatt Nevada Solar One project, the first CSP
plant built in 17 years in the United States, came online last year, and substantially larger plants
are being planned. The Solar Energy Industries Association estimates that more than 4,000
megawatts of CSP is in various stages of planning and development. Environment America
estimates that building 80 gigawatts, enough to power about 25 million homes, of CSP capacity is
achievable by 2030 if there is "sufficient public policy support." This alone would be enough to
curb carbon dioxide emissions from U.S. power plants by 6.6 percent compared to 2000 levels,
the report states. "Solar thermal power can make even greater contributions in the years to come
-- precisely the time when the nation must achieve deep cuts in global warming pollution," the
report says. Solar power plants covering a 100-by-100 square mile area, about 9 percent of the
size of Nevada, could create enough power for the entire nation, the report states. The report
says CSP can be an important way to help bring about deep cuts in greenhouse gas emissions
needed to help stave off the worst effects of global warming. But the group is calling for stronger
public support to help address cost and other barriers. This includes a national renewable
electricity standard of 25 percent by 2025, with a specific amount allotted to solar generation.
Environment America, along with environmental groups and the renewables industry, is pressing
Congress to extend federal renewable energy tax credits that are currently set to expire at the
end of this year.
Gonzaga Debate Institute rps aff supplement
Dunn/Gordon/Lazarevic 3
RPS is feasible and key to the economy and reducing dependence on natural gas
UCS in 2k7 (Union of Concerned Scientists, Cashing in on Clean Energy,
http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/clean_energy/cashing-in-national.pdf)
A national renewable electricity standard would make America’s energy supply more reliable and
secure. It would use local energy sources to create high-skilled U.S. jobs, improve local
economies, put energy dollars back into the pockets of consumers, and reduce the dangers of
global warming and air pollution. Using existing technologies, we can shift away from our
dependence on an unstable, dirty fossil fuel supply, and toward a future built on clean, renewable
energy. We have a responsibility and a compelling financial interest to make the renewable
electricity standard a cornerstone of America’s national energy policy.
Gonzaga Debate Institute rps aff supplement
Dunn/Gordon/Lazarevic 9
RPS is feasible but only with the extension of tax credits for wind and solar
Garrington in 2k8 (Matthew, The Denver Post, Guest Commentary A new energy economy, jan
10, LN)
A national renewable electricity standard is the cornerstone for cutting global warming pollution
and transitioning away from dirty coal plants and to a new energy future. So far, it is states like
Colorado that bear the burden of this fight. Last spring, we doubled our goal of clean, homegrown
energy to 20 percent by 2020. We need Washington to live up to its responsibilities, too.
Moreover, Congress' failure to pass clean-energy tax credits will have an impact on local
businesses. Experts have mapped out the boom-and-bust development of the wind industry
based on year-to-year commitments of renewable tax incentives. Also, solar businesses from
Pueblo to Boulder have talked about why tax credits are the key to growing and maintaining a
robust solar industry in our sun-blessed state. The solar industry estimates that the tax credit
would have created 55,000 new jobs and more than $45 billion in economic investment
nationwide. How can we expect renewables to compete when we're still giving handouts to coal
and nuclear power by the billions while letting federal investments in renewables expire? U.S.
Reps. Diana DeGette and Mark Udall were key in passing the renewable electricity standard
through the House. Sen. Ken Salazar passed a renewable energy standard through the Senate
last spring and continues to fight for this important policy. Unfortunately, Sen. Wayne Allard,
founder of the Senate Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Caucus, chose to help block the
renewable electricity standard despite support of everyone from labor to agriculture to Xcel
Energy to Gov. Bill Ritter. Overall, the final energy bill was good for Colorado. We broke through
30 years of inaction on fuel economy and energy independence. Now, we need Congress to
commit to a New Year's resolution to pass a national renewable electricity standard and the
renewables tax credit package. It's high time for Washington to show the same vision that
Colorado leaders have put forth for a new energy economy.
Gonzaga Debate Institute rps aff supplement
Dunn/Gordon/Lazarevic 10
WARMING ADVANTAGE
RPS SOLVES WARMING
20% RPS is an effective way to solve Warming-power plants are the largest emitters in the
US
UCS in 2k7 (Union of Concerned Scientists, Cashing in on Clean Energy,
http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/clean_energy/cashing-in-national.pdf)
If left unchecked, heat-trapping emissions such as carbon dioxide (CO2) are expected to cause
dangerous global warming that threatens our health and environment. Increased renewable
energy use would provide an affordable global warming solution by reducing fossil fuel demand,
thereby reducing CO2 emissions from the largest U.S. source: power plants. The 20 percent
national standard would reduce power plant CO2 emissions by 223 million metric tons per year
by 2020 (8 percent below BAU and a 63 percent reduction in EIA’s projected growth of power
plant CO2 emissions from today’s levels), equivalent to taking 36.4 million cars off the road.
AT: ECON DA
L/T- RPS GROWTH
RPS will not hurt the economy-it will generate thousands of jobs, billions in investment,
and solve US competitiveness
Sierra Club in 2k8 (Myths vs. Reality about a 20% Renewable Portfolio Standard,
http://www.sierraclub.org/globalwarming/cleanenergy/renewables.asp)
Claim: A 20% RPS will hurt consumers and reduce economic growth and employment.
Reality: : A national RES would have substantial economic benefits. Both EIA and UCS analyses
found that under a 20% RES, total consumer energy bills would be lower in 2020 than business-
as-usual because the RES would reduce natural gas prices. Lower energy bills will make the
American economy more competitive and increase economic growth and employment. A 20%
RES would create 80,000 new, high quality jobs in the wind industry alone; spur $80 billion in new
capital investment; and provide $1.2 billion in new income for farmers, ranchers and rural
landowners and $5 billion in property tax revenues for communities.
Furthermore, creating a healthy renewable electricity industry would position U.S. renewable
energy firms to compete successfully with European and Japanese companies for a multi-billion
international market in renewable energy.
Gonzaga Debate Institute rps aff supplement
Dunn/Gordon/Lazarevic 15
RPS will generate thousands of jobs and billions of investment in the economy-saves the
manufacturing sector
UCS in 2k7 (Union of Concerned Scientists, Cashing in on Clean Energy,
http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/clean_energy/cashing-in-national.pdf)
A renewable electricity standard would benefit the U.S. economy in other significant ways. For
example, dollars invested in clean energy go toward high-quality jobs in manufacturing and
construction, as well as jobs in operations, maintenance, finance, sales, shipping, and other
industries. Jobs are also created when these workers spend their income on goods and services
and when consumer energy bill savings are spent in the local economy. By 2020, the total new
renewable energy development needed to meet a 20 percent national standard would generate
185,000 jobs. State level poli- cies—primarily renewable electricity Electricity Bill Savings*
standards—would make an important contribution toward this job creation total as well as spur
other economic benefits. Excluding the development from full compliance with state standards,
renewable energy technologies would create nearly three times as many jobs as producing an
equivalent amount of electricity from fossil fuels—resulting in a net benefit of 120,000 jobs. The
national standard would also generate an additional $6.3 billion in income and $5.7 billion in U.S.
gross domestic product in 2020. Renewable energy technologies tend to create more jobs than
fossil fuel technologies because a larger share of the expenditures for renewable energy is spent
on manufacturing equipment, installation, and maintenance, all of which are typically more labor
intensive than extracting and transporting fossil fuels. Renewable energy facilities also do not
need to export cash to import fuel from other states or countries (with bioenergy, money is spent
on locally produced fuel), keeping money circulating in the local economy.
Gonzaga Debate Institute rps aff supplement
Dunn/Gordon/Lazarevic 17
A national RPS would lower consumer costs and create billions in investment and jobs
Udall in 2k7 (Tom, U.S. Representative, Third Congressional District Energy security increases
national security, congressional documents and publications, dec 6, LN)
Today, for the second time since August, the U.S. House of Representatives passed energy
legislation including a bipartisan provision authored by Rep. Tom Udall, D-N.M, to create a federal
standard for electric utilities to provide 15 percent of their electricity from wind, solar, and other
renewable energy sources and energy efficiency measures by 2020. Udall, who first introduced
Renewable Electricity Standard (RES) legislation in 2002, said almost half the states in the Union,
including New Mexico, have led this effort by already implementing their own RES. "New Mexico
is a leader in producing renewable electricity," said Udall. "After surpassing its initial goal of 10
percent years in advance, our state has now enacted a 20 percent by 2020 standard. New
Mexico and many other states have recognized that energy security and national security are
directly correlated, and now the responsibility rests with the Senate to send the president the
message that we must move our nation towards a more stable energy future." Udall urged
colleagues in the Senate to pass the measure, "The benefits of an RES are clear and I call on my
colleagues in the Senate to enact this provision because it will strengthen our energy security,
lower our energy bills, create jobs, revitalize rural America, spur our economy and slow global
warming." Udall directly addressed the false rhetoric asserting that the implementation of this
standard could negatively impact certain states and consumers. "Opponents of an RES have
made false claims that the provision would increase electricity costs for consumers, but study
after study has shown the contrary. It has consistently been found that a strong federal RES could
actually save American consumers money." While somewhat more conservative in their findings,
the most recent study from the Department of Energy's Energy Information Administration (EIA) --
which provides official energy statistics for the U.S. government -- show cumulative savings in the
amount $6.1 billion and $1.3 billion in savings, respectively, through 2020. And by 2030,
cumulative savings are $5.5 billion and $3.3 billion, respectively. Other studies show more
significant savings. A recent study conducted by the Union of Concerned Scientists found an RES
would save consumers $13 billion to $18.1 billion on electricity and natural gas bills cumulatively
by 2020. In March, the energy consulting firm Wood Mackenzie projected that consumers would
save more than $100 billion dollars with an RES in place. They also found that with more diverse
energy sources and a decrease in fossil fuel consumption, reduced demand for natural gas would
lower prices by as much as 20 percent by 2026.
Gonzaga Debate Institute rps aff supplement
Dunn/Gordon/Lazarevic 18
AT: STATES CP
Solvency deficit-state action is happening in the status quo and will fail. At best it solves
4%
Sovacool et al in 2k7 (Benjamin, and Jack Barkenbus, sovacool currently teaches in the Government and
International Affairs Program at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia. He is a
former Eugene P. Wigner Fellow at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and a senior research
fellow at the Network for New Energy Choicesin New York, Barkenbus is a senior research associate at the Vanderbilt
Center for Environmental Management Studies in Nashville. He was formerly the executive director of the Energy,
Environment and Resources Center at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Environment, necessary but
insufficient: state renewable portfolio standards and climate change policies, LN)
Free market advocates have occasionally derided the case for national action on renewable
portfolio standards (RPS)--laws mandating that electricity suppliers use a certain percentage of
renewable energy by a particular date. But proponents point out that these regulations are
needed to correct three major market failures in the electric utility industry. First, they argue that
electricity prices do not reflect the social costs of generating power; second, that energy subsidies
have created an unfair market advantage for fossil fuel and nuclear technologies; and third, that
renewable energy generation is subject to a "free rider" phenomenon. (9) To gain the
transparent and multiple benefits from renewable energy at a larger scale, bold federal action is
essential. It is true that some states and regions of the nation are better positioned to exploit
renewable resources, but all regions can exploit some form of renewables, and RPS proposals
have been crafted to allow for a large portfolio of choices at the electricity retail level. Most
compelling, under the current state initiatives, renewables will still only account for 4 percent of
national capacity by 2030.
State action is only preferable if NO federal action exists-national standards have superior
solvency
Sovacool et al in 2k7 (Benjamin, and Jack Barkenbus, sovacool currently teaches in the Government and
International Affairs Program at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia. He is a
former Eugene P. Wigner Fellow at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and a senior research
fellow at the Network for New Energy Choicesin New York, Barkenbus is a senior research associate at the Vanderbilt
Center for Environmental Management Studies in Nashville. He was formerly the executive director of the Energy,
Environment and Resources Center at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Environment, necessary but
insufficient: state renewable portfolio standards and climate change policies, LN)
It is safe to say, therefore, that considerable state action in both cases has arisen not because of
some judgment that state-based action is optimal or preferable but rather because of the
perceived policy vacuum at the federal level. A federal-scale political philosophy of allowing
market forces to determine energy and environmental policy dates back at least as far as the
presidency of Ronald Reagan, and it has been reinforced by the political power of Washington,
DC-basedinterest groups and trade associations who have a stake in maintaining the status quo.
However, this philosophy and political structure is not mirrored throughout much of the country,
and hence many states have become very active in the RPS and climate change arena. And,
similarly, many other states that mirror the philosophy and approach of the federal level remain
inactive. The piecemeal approach to renewables and climate change represented by state
action, while laudable as an alternative to federal inaction and consistent with the way many
issues are brought to the federal agenda (such as was the case for energy appliance standards
and the acid rain provisions of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990), is ultimately an
inadequate response to the magnitude of the challenges the country faces in energy and climate
change.
Gonzaga Debate Institute rps aff supplement
Dunn/Gordon/Lazarevic 20
AT: STATES CP
Patch work of state policies makes RPS superior on the national level
Sovacool et al in 2k7 (Benjamin, and Jack Barkenbus, sovacool currently teaches in the Government and
International Affairs Program at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia. He is a
former Eugene P. Wigner Fellow at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and a senior research
fellow at the Network for New Energy Choicesin New York, Barkenbus is a senior research associate at the Vanderbilt
Center for Environmental Management Studies in Nashville. He was formerly the executive director of the Energy,
Environment and Resources Center at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Environment, necessary but
insufficient: state renewable portfolio standards and climate change policies, LN)
While the considerable state-based RPS activity, just described, can be lauded as better than no
action at all, it is not necessarily superior to national legislation. Important issues such as
geographic scope, eligible technologies or industries, inclusion of existing versus new
technologies, and the specifics of credit trading have been decided differently in every state.
Consequently, the resulting state-based market may create confusion, complexity, and
inconsistency for policymakers, investors, and businesses. Contrary to enabling a well-
lubricated national renewable energy market, inconsistencies between states--over what counts
as renewable energy, when it has to come online, how large it has to be, where it must be
delivered, and how it may be traded--clog the renewable energy market like coffee grounds in a
drain. Implementing agencies and stakeholders must grapple with inconsistent state RPS goals,
and investors must interpret competing and often arbitrary statutes. (19)