Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Strategy Implementation-Balanced Score Card
Strategy Implementation-Balanced Score Card
Presenters
Nisha Chittilapilly B003
Kamakhya Narayan B011
Balance Scorecard
Developed in the early 1990s by Drs. Robert Kaplan and David Norton. The balance scorecard is a management system that enables organizations to clarify their vision and strategy and translate them into actions.
Contd
The balanced scorecard methodology builds on some key concepts of previous management ideas such as Total Quality Management (TQM), including customerdefined quality, continuous improvement, employee empowerment, and primarily --- measurement based management and feedback.
The balanced scorecard incorporates feedback around internal business process outputs, as in TQM, but also adds a feedback loop around the outcomes of business strategies. This creates a double-loop feedback" process in the balanced scorecard
Characteristics
Its a top- down reflection of the companys mission strategy It is forward-looking It integrates external and internal measures It helps you focus
What we do
What we aspire to be How we accomplish our goals
Measures
Environmental Scan Strengths Opportunities A Model for Strategic Planning Values Weaknesses Threats
Contd..
The Balanced Scorecard model suggests that we view the organization from 4 perspectives.
Then Develop metrics, collect data and analyze it relative to each of these perspectives
Financial Perspective
In Private companies, the financial perspective is the main objective (ultimate goal) without having to sacrifice the interest of other relevant stakeholders (community, environment, government, etc.)
In the financial perspective, the strategic goal is the long-term shareholder value. This goal is driven by two factors, namely: revenue growth and cost efficiency
Customer Perspective
This perspective is very instrumental, because without customers, how can a company survive?
Customer perspective covers the following elements: Customer acquisition Customer retention Customer profitability Market share Customer satisfaction
Market Share
Customer Acquisition
Price
Quality
Service
Availability
Brand
Innovation Processes
Acquisition
Retention Growth
Knowledge
Attitude
Strategy Map
"The problem is that not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts."
---Albert Einstein
32%
68% 80%
68%
32% 20%
1985
1995
2010
Revenue
Information Technology
Intangible Assets Do Not Have A Direct Impact on Financial Results They Have Second- or Third-Order Impacts Conventional approach to managing financial & operational indicators insufficient Balanced Approach to Strategy Implementation should includes focus on customer/stakeholder & learning, growth & innovation Understanding & managing/leveraging inter-relationships between the above areas necessary for value creation
Measure
Need balanced scorecard to measure How you have been doing (lagging indicator) How well you are doing (current indicator) How well you can expect to do in future (leading indicator)
Team/ Individual
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT What we must improve EMPOWERMENT / PERSONAL OBJECTIVES What I need to do
Financial
Customers Internal Business Processes Learning & Growth
Full length research paper available on African Journal on Business Management, Volume 5 dated 4 January, 11 Also Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/ AJBM
Hsu Feng Hung (Department of Business Administration, National ChengChi University, Taiwan)
Year
1995
2005
2006
1250
5000
5500
Methodology Adopted
3 companies namely Company A, Company B & Company C taken for study purpose out of top 10 in Taiwan (By Annual Revenues rankings) Company A Implemented Balanced Scorecard Methodology (Since 2004) Data collection 2003 / Observations taken 2006 Company B & C Not implemented Balanced Scorecard methodology
Conceptual Framework
Comparison
1982 . software development . Process improvement . Enterprise Resources Planning (ERP) Major Businesses . System application . e-training, . Information safety . Technical R&D Branches in Taiwan Branches in China Employees (Only in Taiwan) Employees (Including China) Annual Revenues in USD millions (Only in Taiwan) Annual Revenues in USD millions (Including China) 6 18 900 1900 Particulars Year of Establishment Company A Company B 1980 Company C 1985 . software R & D . software design and R & D . Enterprise Resource Planning . Enterprise Process . Enterprise Process Reengineering Reengineering . System application . e-training . e-training . Supply Chain Management . Information safety protection .Information safety protection 10 15 850 1800 5 12 700 1600
160
150
120
500
470
360
Vision of Company A
To become the top one in Taiwan,
SWOT ANALYSIS
STRATEGY MAP CAUSE & EFFECT DIAGRAM
SWOT ANALYSIS
STRENGTH
The functions of the package software developed are comprehensive and considerably humanized, along with rather attractive prices The software and network facility installed by Company A for its clients/customers provides reasonable prices and high stability The R&D competence of the R&D Department of Company A is extremely strong, hard to duplicate by fellow competitors
STRENGTH Continued.
The corporate culture of Company A is very active and innovative The market share of Company A is high (about 10%)
WEAKNESS
The selling and administrative expenses ratio (about 38%) is slightly higher than 32% of the other main competitors The academic record of employees above graduate school (about 9%) is slightly lower than 11%, the average level of other main competitors
OPPORTUNITY
The strengthening of e commerce of corporations incurs drastic increases of demand in both software and hardware Active development of the market in China and the market demand in China is large Considerable rise in added value for products.
THREAT
Increase of the imported foreign package software causes market competition to be intense Many new domestic suppliers participate in market competition
Many existing domestic customers have migrated to China that they may turn to the products of other competitors in the China market
STRATEGY MAP
Strategies of Company A
Maintain an innovative corporate culture Reduce selling and administrative expenses ratio Increase the ratio of employees with educational record above graduate school More active launchings in China and other international markets Increase the product added value to increase profitability and product competency
Work achievement rate Product delivery delay rate Production cost ratio Comprehensive and humanized level of product functions Product stability
Financial Perspective
Customer Perspective
Stochastic variable?
Stochastic variables are built on random numbers The random numbers are guided by a mathematical function The mathematical expressions used for stochastic variables are determined by parameters set by the creator of the simulation model Example: Binomial function has two parameters N and p. N is the maximum possible number of events and p is the probability for each event to occur.
Deterministic v. Stochastic
Deterministic Fixed Data 7% Fixed Outcomes $1,200,00
Variable Outcomes
Forecast: Scenario A Retirement Portfolio Frequency Chart 6 Outliers
47
.07 1
3 5 .2 5
.04 7
2 3.5
.02 4
1 1 .7 5
3 5 0 .0 0
4 2 5 .0 0
5 0 0 .0 0
5 7 5 .0 0
6 5 0 .0 0
Data
Expert knowledge
Distributions Sampled
Example
How many ways to roll two dice?
6+1 5+1 4+1 3+1 2+1 1+1 2 1+2 3 17% 2+2 1+3 4 3+2 2+3 1+4 5 42% 4+2 3+3 2+4 1+5 6 5+2 4+3 3+4 2+5 1+6 7 58% 6+2 5+3 4+4 3+5 2+6 8 6+3 5+4 4+5 3+6 9 89% 6+4 5+5 4+6 10 6+5 5+6 11 6+6 12
100%
Demonstration
Task: To estimate the total time a 3-stages construction project will take to complete. The stages have to be done one after the other, so the total time for the project will be the sum of the three stages. All the
Demonstration (cont.)
Basic Forecasting Model: Create a single estimate for each of the three stages of the project.
Task Time Estimate
Thus this model gives us a result for the total time to complete the project = 14 months.
Demonstration (cont.)
Problem with the current model: Unknown RISK The outcome is based on three estimates, each of which is an unknown value. It might be a good estimate, but this model can't tell us anything about risk. How likely is it that the project will be completed on time?
Demonstration (cont.)
Monte Carlo Simulation Model: Create 3 estimates for each of the three stages of the project.
For each task, we estimate the minimum and maximum expected time (based on our experience, or expertise, or historical information) and use these with the most likely estimate that was used in the Basic Forecasting Model.
Demonstration (cont.)
Forecasting Model Using Range Estimates:
Task Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Total Minimum 4 Months 3 Months 4 Months 11 Months Most Likely 5 Months 4 Months 5 Months 14 Months Maximum 7 Months 6 Months 6 Months 19 Months
Now, there is a range of possible outcomes. The project might be completed in as little as 11 months, or as long as 19 months.
Demonstration (cont.)
Working of Monte Carlo Simulation: Generate values randomly for each of the tasks. Calculate the total time to complete the project. The simulation will be run 500 times. Based on the results of the simulation, describe some of the characteristics of the risk in the model. To test the likelihood of a particular result, we count how many times the model returned that result in the simulation. In this case, we want to know how many times the result was less than or equal to particular number of months.
Demonstration (cont.)
Results of a Monte Carlo Simulation:
Time 12 Months 13 Months 14 Months 15 Months 16 Months 17 Months 18 Months 1 30 140 223 88 17 1 Results Cumulative % of Total (out of 500) (Rounded) 1 0% 31 171 394 482 499 500 6% 34% 79% 96% 100% 100%
Demonstration (cont.)
Probability of Completion Within Specified Time (Months)
Demonstration (cont.)
Conclusion: Out of 500 trials using random values, the total time was 14 months or less in only 34% of the cases. In other words, there is only a 34% chance about 1 out of 3 that any individual trial will result in a total time of 14 months or less. On the other hand, there is a 79% chance that the project will be completed within 15 months. Further, the model demonstrates that it is extremely unlikely, in the simulation, that we will ever fall at the absolute minimum or maximum total values.
Conclusion
Monte Carlo Model demonstrates the risk and uncertainty. Each uncertain variable is modeled by a probability distribution rather than a single value. It enables to calculate the combined impact of the various uncertainties present in the model, in order to determine a probability distribution of the possible outcomes. Having more information about risk at the beginning means we can make a better plan for going forward.
Q And A Session
1. What is the balanced scorecard? 2. What are the four perspectives? 3. What are the benefits of the balanced scorecard approach? 4. What challenges will anybody encounter trying to develop and deploy a balanced scorecard system?
Q And A Session
5. Is the balanced scorecard relevant to private-sector companies? 6. Is the balanced scorecard relevant to government agencies? 7. Is the balanced scorecard relevant to nonprofit organizations? 8. Few examples where Monte Carlo is being used.
THANK YOU