Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Brand Wars
Brand Wars
Brand Wars
It is designed to highlight the advantages of the goods or services offered by the advertiser as compared to those of a competitor. It drives sales by comparing the features or services of a brand with that of its closest competitor.
To generate attention and larger number of views. To make certain claims that they are better than their competitors.
VS
Rin powder was launched in 1994 as Rin Power White. The advertising campaign 'ZARA SA RIN' which means 'just a little of Rin' achieves superlative whiteness.
Consumers believe that white clothes once dirtied or stained can never look new again. Tide wanted to change this very belief of the consumers by bringing to life the Tide dirt magnets property.
Initially Tide was trailing behind Rin but since 2007, sales picked up, and its market share rose posing a threat to HUL whose share started eroding. In December 2009, P&G Home Products introduced Tide Natural, a new version of Tide, at a price lower than HULs Rin brand targeted at the rural segment.
Competitive intensity had increased after the launch of Tide Naturals by P&G in the mass segment.
HUL had responded with aggressive price cuts in Rin and a formulation change and thus the war begins.
In Jan 2004 new Rin powder was launched with double whiteness proposition. Rin was priced at Rs. 42 for 1 kg pack, and Rs. 20 for 500 gms and Rs. 10 for 250 grams. Seeing the bold & confident move from Hul and realizing that pricing being of one reason for not being accepted by market even P&G slashed the prices of Tide. The Price was brought down to Rs. 23 for 500 gms as against previous price of Rs. 43 , Rs. 50 for 750 gms as against Rs. 70.
P&G takes HUL to court over Rin advertisement. The practice of pulling down rivals in ones marketing communications is not new in India, yet, the ad took the
P&G has
filed a
High Court
against Hindustan Unilever's new ad campaign, which openly challenged the superiority of its product Rin over P&G's Tide.
The price wars enabled P&G to popularize the brand and increase the penetration.
Apart from this there is also a layer of celebrity power in the form of bollywood actor Kajol as an additional punch .
VS
Horlicks has been a popular brand in India since 1930. The Horlicks available has been scientifically developed and specifically caters to the nutritional needs of the Indian diet. Horlicks alone enjoys 50% of the Health Food Drinks market. Complan was launched in India in 1964. Complan the Complete Planned Food in a Drink is formulated as per the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines suggested for growing children.
Horlicks initially positioned itself as food for convalescing and a nutrient supplement for kids only. Later on it introduced other variants to reposition itself from children segment to other segments. Its brand image too have changed from a boring health drink to something that is nourishing& enjoyable.
Horlicks
It targets mothers for its nourishment and kids for its great taste and variety.
Complan
Complan
mainly
target
growing
children
Complan is also ideal for busy adults (especially housewives and rushed office-goers), expectant and nursing athletes. mother, elderly people and
BRAND
MARKET SHARE
PRODUCT AVAILABILITY
CLAIM
GSK
50%
"Children have become taller, stronger and sharper. The Horlicks challenge now proven. Grow faster with Complan.
HEINZ CADBURY
17%
Horlicks
Initially, horlicks was just a nutritional drink positioned only for the sick patients and mal nutritioned. But later it repositioned itself as complete nutritional
drink.
With the slogan HAPPONG , OPPANG , CHAPPONG . It again improved itself to TALLER, STRONGER, SHARPER.
It soon came up with Junior Horlicks , Mothers Horlicks and Horlicks Lite thereby pulling in new customers.
Complan
The Complan boy then says, MINE COSTS RS. 170 and the Horlicks boy replies, MINE COSTS ONLY RS. 131.
Horlicks thus highlighted the nutritional content and price gap between the two brands, and showed Horlicks as a better and more inexpensive health drink.
As you all know that Every coin has two sides Similarly comparative advertisements are important and beneficial from the consumers and producers point of view only to the extent it is providing information about the product and making them aware. On the other hand comparative advertisements are not beneficial if advertisers comparisons are false & misleading.