2 - 2008-Retinal Blood Vessel Segmentation Using Line Operators and Support Vector Classification

You might also like

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 19

Retinal Blood Vessel Segmentation Using Line Operators and Support Vector Classification

Source: IEEE Transactions on medical imaging, Vol. 26, No. 10, pp. 1357-1365, 2007 Authors: Elisa Ricci and Renzo Perfetti

Reporter: Pei-Yen Pai


Date: 2008.01.10

Outline
Introduction Proposed method Experimental results

Conclusions
2

Introduction (1/2)

Retinal image

Vessel segmentation image

Introduction (2/2)

Color retinal image

Green channel of retinal image


4

Line Detector (1/4)

15
0

S i, j Li, j N i, j

S(i,j) is line strength of the pixel. L(i,j) is line with the largest average grey level. N(i,j) is the average grey level in the square windows.
5

Line Detector (2/4)

Line Detector (3/4)

Line Detector (4/4)

S o i, j Lo i, j N i, j orientations : 00 , 450 , 900 , and 1350

Assuming three pixels is considerer: So(i,j) is line strength of the pixel three pixels. Lo (i,j) is line with the largest average grey level. N(i,j) is the average grey level in the square windows.
8

ex : orthogonaldirection for 300 , 450 and 600 is 1350

Feature Vector
X S i, j S o i, j I i, j
I(i,j) is the gray level value at the pixel.

where xi is the ith feature i 1,2 ,3 of the feature vector.

xi i xi (Normalization) i

, i and i are the correspond mean and standard deviation ing

SVM Classification

10

Experiments
STARE database
20 images 700 x 605 pixels FOV (field of view): 650 x 550 pixels Manually segmented by 2 observers First observer as ground truth
FOV

DRIVE database
40 images 768 x 584 pixels FOV: 540 x 540 pixels 20 images for training set and 20 images for test set Four pathological images in the test set Manually segmented by 2 observers on test set First observer as ground truth

11

STARE database

DRIVE database

12

Experimental Results 1/6


TPR: 0.903 FPR: 0.061 TPR:0.775 FPR: 0.0275

(Receiver operating characteristic)

SVM classifier: 20000 manually segmented pixels SVM classifier: 20000 manually segmented pixels from 20 images from 20 training set images

TPR: The true positive rate. FPR: The false positive rate.
13

Experimental Results 2/6

AUC: the area under the ROC curve ACCURACY: the total NO. of correctly classified pixels / the NO. of pixels in the image FOV.
14

Experimental Results 3/6

Image segmented using the line detector


15

Experimental Results 4/6

Linear SVM

Observer A

Observer B

Linear SVM

Observer A

Observer B

16

Experimental Results 5/6

17

Experimental Results 6/6

18

Conclusions
Simple computation Good results with respect to existing unsupervised methods The supervised approach requires fewer feature than existing methods

19

You might also like