Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Qualitative Risk Assessment: Chapter-9 Date: 31 October, 2012
Qualitative Risk Assessment: Chapter-9 Date: 31 October, 2012
What is risk?
A controversial but inherent property of everyday life
Examples of some commonplace risks in the United States Risk Cancer from cigarette smoking (one pack per day) Death in a motor vehicle accident Homicide Home accident deaths Cancer from exposure to radon in homes Death from hepatitis A Exposure to the pesticide aflatoxin in peanut butter Diarrhea from rotavirus Exposure to typical EPA maximum chemical contaminant levels Lifetime risk of mortality 1:4 2:100 1:100 1:100 3:1000 3:1000 6:10,000 1:10,000 1:10,0001:10,000,000
It is generally agreed that a lifetime involuntary risk on the order of 1:1,000,000 is small enough to be acceptable or is a tolerable risk.
Risk Assessment
Definition: The process of estimating both the probability that an event will occur and the probable magnitude of its adverse effects over a specified time period. Both chemical and microbial risk assessments can be performed. Each consists of four basic steps: 1) 2) 3) 4) Hazard identification - identify the chemical (e.g, lead) or microbial (e.g, Polio virus) contaminant Exposure assessment Dose-response assessment Risk characterization
Step 2 - Exposure assessment The process of measuring or estimating the intensity, frequency and duration of human exposures to a chemical or microbe Exposure pathway the path from a source to the receptor air water Exposure route intake pathway inhalation ingestion absorption through skin Exposure response is mediated by concentration of chemical/microbe exposure rate (magnitude, frequency, duration) receptor characteristics (body weight, genetics, immunity)
Event trees simplify modeling the infectivity of a pathogen. The following is an example of an event tree used to estimate the human exposure to Salmonella as a result of biosolids applied to a lettuce crop.
Raw sewage 2.9 x 107 CFU/ton
Step 3 - Dose-response assessment Quantitating adverse effects from exposure based on the degree of exposure The goal of a dose-response assessment is to obtain a mathematical relationship between the amount of a toxicant/microbe involved in an exposure to the risk of an adverse outcome. To determine the capacity of an agent to cause harm, we need to quantify toxicity or infectivity. Dose mg chemical/body weight # microbes/exposure Possible responses no response temporary response permanent response chronic functional impairment death
Step 4 - Risk characterization Estimating the potential impact of a contaminants based on the severity of its effects and the amount of exposure. If one looks at the four steps of risk assessment, there is uncertainty associated with each step of the assessment. The various sources of uncertainty include: extrapolation from high to low doses extrapolation from animal to human responses extrapolation from one route of exposure to another limitations of analytical methods estimates of exposure In addition, one must consider vulnerable populations that may be impacted differently than the general population by the outcome of a risk analysis.
Example: Infectious hepatitis and viral gastroenteritis are caused by consumption of raw or, in some cases, cooked clams and oysters. The concentration of echovirus 12 was found to be 8 plaque-forming units (PFU) per 100 g in oysters collected from coastal New England waters. What are the risks of becoming infected and ill from echovirus 12 if the oysters are consumed? Assume that a person usually consumes 60 g of oyster meat in a single serving:
It has been found that a modified exponential model works well for microbial risk assessment:
P = 1 (1 + N/)-
where: P is the probability of infection, N is the number of organisms ingested, and and are parameters characterizing the host-virus interaction from the dose-response curve. For this example, = 0.374, = 186.69, these parameters were estimated from ingestion studies for echovirus 12. Recall there are 8 PFU/100 g oyster and 60 g are consumed: N = 4.8 PFU consumed Using this model for this example: P = 1 (1 + 4.8/186.69)-0.374 = 9.4 x 10-3
If the percentage of infections that result in risk of clinical illness is 50%, then the risk of clinical illness is: Risk of clinical illness = (9.4 x 10-3)(0.50) = 4.7 x 10-3
If a person consumes oyster 10 times a year with 4.8 PFU per serving, then one can calculate the risk of infection in 1 year: Annual risk = PA = 1 (1 9.4 x 10-3)365 = 9.7 x 10-1
Example 2 Comparison of outbreak data to model predictions for assessment of risks associated with exposure to Salmonella
Predicted P (%) 12 77 54
Cheese
Cheese Ham
100500
105 106
28 g
100 g 50100 g
2836
100 100
5398
>99.99 >99.99
Risk assessment provides an effective framework for determining the relative urgency of problems and the allocation of resources to reduce risks. Risk assessment is used routinely to make decisions by: FDA (Food and Drug Administration) OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) These agencies use risk assessment in a variety of situations: Setting standards for chemical or pathogens in water/food
Assessing risk from GEMS (genetically engineered microbes) Conducting baseline analysis of contaminated sites to determine need for cleanup Cost/benefit analysis Development of cleanup goals Constructing what if scenarios Evaluation of existing and new technologies for pollution prevention and control Articulation of public health concerns