Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CEE-154/NUTR-204: Fall 2012: Case Reports, Case Series and Cross-Sectional Studies
CEE-154/NUTR-204: Fall 2012: Case Reports, Case Series and Cross-Sectional Studies
Abstract (continued)
The scalp alone was affected in 8 cases, the scalp and eyelashes in 1 case, and the eyelashes alone in 1 case. The frontal scalp and vertex were the most common sites affected. Associated findings included nailbiting in 2 cases, "picking" of the skin in 1 case, and headaches in another case. Noted precipitating factors in 3 patients included "stress" at home and school. Associated psychopathology included major depression in 1 case, attentiondeficit/hyperactivity disorder in 1 case, and an "anxious and nervous personality" in 1 case.
Abstract (continued)
The most important differential diagnosis to exclude from trichotillomania is alopecia areata, which was seen concomitantly in 1 patient and preceded the onset of hair-pulling by 11 months. Eight patients were referred to a child psychologist for additional management, of which 2 were subsequently treated with antidepressant medication.
Imported Measles Case Associated with Nonmedical Vaccine Exemption --- Iowa, March 2004
On March 13, 2004, the Iowa Department of Public Health (IDPH) reported to CDC that a male student aged 19 years with measles in the infectious stage had flown from New Delhi, India, to Cedar Rapids, Iowa, on March 12. Because of a nonmedical exemption, the student had not received measles-containing vaccine (MCV). This report describes the measles case, the public health response to prevent secondary cases, and the impact on the public health system. Health-care providers and state and local public health departments should be alert to possible cases of measles in persons who traveled with this student or their contacts. Parents considering nonmedical exemptions for their children should be aware of the potential risk for disease both for their children and the public.
Marta Guerra Assignments: Worked to contain Ebola outbreak in Uganda, investigated Q fever outbreak in Wyoming, and hopes to educate the public on rabies during her time as an EIS officer. Education: University of Pennsylvania (B.A., 1979); University of Florida (D.V.M., 1985); University of South Florida (M.P.H., 1995); University of Illinois, Champaign/Urbana (Ph.D., 2000). Where She Is Today: Guerra lives in Atlanta, where she is currently serving as an EIS officer.
Percival Potts Observations on Scrotal Cancer in Young Chimney Sweeps = Classic Case Series in late 18th Century
Pott noted high rates of a rare cancer in an unusual population. Did not have the knowledge or techniques to pursue cause and effect. Attributed high rates as probably due to irritation (at least partly correct).
Young sweeps
The young sweeps carried heavy extender pipes to reach areas into which even they could not crawl. So they would not be punished, young sweeps frequently worked naked and greased, exposing their entire bodies to carcinogens. The grease would the hold the carcinogens in place.
Pott wrote:
...The fate of these people is particularly hard...they are thrust up narrow, sometimes hot chimneys where they are bruised, burned and almost suffocated; and when they get to puberty, become particularly liable to a most noisome, painful, and fatal disease...of the scrotum and testicles.
CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES:
Cross-sectional studies are often called prevalence surveys. In their most basic form, a researcher recruits a group of people and obtains measurements of some kind at one particular point in time. There is no concept of prospective or retrospective time. Are on the border between analytic and descriptive studies.
continued
Cross-sectional studies are sort of on the border between analytic studies and descriptive studies. Data are at the individual level, so cross-sectional studies are sometimes viewed as analytic. Since there is no time element, however, crosssectional studies are usually best viewed as hybrid studies. Following is a generic schematic of a cross-sectional study. Note that everything happens at once and we have no element of time.
Cross-sectional data on physical activity and metabolic syndrome (HHS, 6/08 Report)
From the cross-sectional studies in which minutes per week of moderate-intensity physical activity for each category were provided or could be estimated, 120, 150, and 180 minutes or more per week of moderate intensity activity have all been reported as minimum amounts associated with reduced prevalence of metabolic syndrome. Studies used different methods of activity assessment, the activity categories have large ranges, and the cut-points for the activity categories were not that similar. None of the studies was designed or powered to analyze the minimal dose of activity to prevent metabolic syndrome. However, the cross-sectional data supports that obtaining at least 120 to 180 minutes per week of moderate-intensity physical activity is consistently associated with a lower prevalence of metabolic syndrome.
Cross-sectional data on moderate to vigorous exercise and decreased risk of CHD in older men:
CHD Exercise Yes No Total Yes 54 112 166 No 1503 853 2355 Total 1556 965 2521
OR = (54 x 853) / (112 x 1503) = 0.27. This would be a very strong finding in terms of branding moderate to vigorous exercise in older men a protective factor against CHD. Some researchers interpreted the data in just this manner.
Continued
Unfortunately, it turned out that many of the men in the non-exercising group were there because, at some point in the past, they had developed cardiovascular symptoms indicative of CHD and had to quit intensive exercise. It took long-term cohort studies to better characterize that exercise was indeed a protective factor against CHD, although not as strong as cross-sectional data had suggested.
In the past...
Large population of exercising middle-aged men
Some develop symptoms of CHD during exercise and quit (symptoms group)
Some do not develop CHD symptoms and continue exercising (no symptoms group)
The c cell is inflated with men from the symptoms group. This makes b x c biased in favor of rejecting the null hypothesis.