Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Trade Theory
Trade Theory
government action, and industry characteristics that enable such exchange to happen
As output expands with specialization, an industrys ability to realize economies of scale increases and unit costs decrease Because of scale economies, world demand supports only a few firms in such industries (e.g., commercial aircraft, automobiles) Countries that had an early entrant to such an industry have an advantage:
Fist-mover advantage
Barrier to entry
Strategic Rivalry
goods more capital intensive than those it exports Explanation(?): US has special advantage on producing new products made with innovative technologies These may be less capital intensive till they reach massproduction state
Products differ according to the types of factors that they need as inputs
A country has a comparative advantage in producing products that intensively use factors of production (resources) it has in abundance Factors of production: labor, capital, land, human resources, technology
Aid decisions; minimize risk of new product introductions Demand not based on price; low product cost not an issue
Product becomes standardized production moves to low production cost areas Product now imported to US and to advanced countries
Increasing returns of specialization due to economies of scale (unit costs of production decrease)
First mover advantages (economies of scale such that barrier to entry crated for second or third company)
Luck... first mover may be simply lucky. Government intervention: strategic trade policy
Factor endowments
Demand conditions
Location Foreign
Investment Decisions
Government
Policy implications
What is a Trade Barrier Types: -Import duties -Import quotas -Import licenses -Tariffs -Export licenses -Subsidies -Non-tariff barriers to trade -Voluntary Export Restraints
Composition of Trade
Elastic and Inelastic nature of Export and Import
World Trade Organization Lower tariffs for industrial products Agriculture Textiles and clothing Services Intellectual Property Dispute settlement
Permanent institution to perform GATT functions - first ministerial meeting in Singapore December 1996 Standing councils for goods, services, and TRIPS, with continuous negotiations on further liberalization More efficient dispute settlement
Tariff reductions
Developed country tariffs reduced by a third within 5-10 years, to about 3% Tariff binding national lists to include almost all products
Eliminated tariffs
Pharmaceuticals Paper Steel Construction machinery Agricultural machinery Medical equipment Furniture Toys Beer & brown alcohol
Agriculture
Phasing out of MFA over ten-year period Integration of half of imports into GATT system during transition process Liberalization of remaining quotas during transition process
National schedules
liberalization commitments exceptions from GATS principles
Annexes with rules for specific sector: successfully completed negotiations on telecom and finance
Protection of trade-related intellectual property (TRIPS) - copyrights, trade marks, patents Including trade-related investment measures (TRIMS) under GATT rules
prohibitions for investment rules that distort
Agriculture and services: implementation of Uruguay round decisions + further liberalization Development perspective: particular concern for interests of developing countries Working groups for tough questions: environment, competition policy, investment rules, social issues
Weak competitiveness in industry Inefficient customs and trade administration Fiscal pressure: tariff revenue important for government budget
Enhanced market access through GSP Higher domestic protection accepted: average bound tariff over 20% Longer adjustment period to meet Uruguay round targets Immunity from countervailing measures if import share is less than 4% Right to use export subsidies for LLDCs
MFA phased out by 2005 Expected increase in exports to OECD between 1995-2005: USD 175 billion But...
liberalization back-loaded
other exporters
Swedish experiences: China and Bangladesh main winners, Portugal main loser
Agriculture
Marrakesh agreement
farmers that live in developing countries total value of support over USD 250 billion: 5 times the value of global development assistance
Services
excluded
companies, call centers in Costa Rica and India, computer programming in Bangalore, health care in Cuba
TRIPS not well liked by developing countries requires complex legal structure unwillingness to pay high prices for medicines worries about patenting of biological organisms TRIMS benefits foreign MNCs in bargaining with local governments FDI incentives can no longer be balanced by requirements
GSP: ~50% lower tariffs for 170 developing countries Lom Conventions 1975-1999: further preferences for 77 ACP countries Cotonou agreement 2000: extension of Lom conventions, ACP countries Everything But Arms 2001: complete tariff elimination for 49 Least Developed Countries
except arms, bananas (all duties eliminated by 2006),
High levels of protection outside OECD Undisciplined use of contingent protection, + agressive unilateralism (EU and US) Gray zone of Non-Tariff Barriers (NTBs) that are not fully addressed by the GATT framework Dispute resolution?