Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HR Real
HR Real
HR Real
Definition of trade dispute by industrial act 1967:any dispute between employers and his workers which is connected with employment or non employment or term of employment or non employment or the terms of employment or the condition of work of any such worker
Cont
Under this Act, matters relating to promotion, recruitment, dismissal, transfer, retrenchment, reinstatement and allocation of duties and prohibition of strikes and lockouts over any of these matters are not allowed to be included in the proposal for collective bargaining.
Where direct negotiation between employers, workmen or employees and their trade unions fails, this Act provides for speedy and just settlement of trade disputes by conciliation or arbitration.
This Act provides the power to the Ministry of Human Resources to intervene and to refer at any stage any trade dispute to the Industrial court for arbitration.
Causes of dispute
A difference of opinion between a union and an employer as to the appropriate terms and conditions of service for the workers. An individual who has a grievance and is represented by his union and who has exhausted the grievance procedure without getting satisfactory result
DEFINITION-A grievance shall be defined as a reasonable and legitimate complain by the employee concern which he brings to the attention of his immediate supervisor and which is subsequently not settled to the satisfaction of the employee.
PROCEDURE
PROCEDURE
Step 1 flow grievance in writing through the hierarchy of management up to HR manager
Step 3- flow in grievance in writing to the company. Company will offer a meeting. Step 4-if the matter unresolved after this meeting, refer to the dispute settlement under provisions of act.
b. c. d. e. f. g.
Direct negotiation
Meditation
Settlement
Arbitration
Ideal method to enable both parties to come to acceptable compromise No involvement by outsider Smooth implementation without causing harm to the relationship Mature and harmonies to solve trade dispute Voluntary negotiation is the first course of action under IRA 1967
A methode seldom use in solve trade dispute Usually will use the third person which normally not from government. A person that being consider by both parties as unbiased and impartial and command inadequate respect and trust. Often a politician or other local person of standing in the communities. Difficult to identify that kind of person which being acceptable by both parties.
Only mean of resolving a dispute when negotiation and intervention by an official of the department is unsuccessfully. Impartial third parties granted authority to resolve the dispute by studying the information submitted by both side and arrived at a judgment. the IC is empower to arbitrate trade dispute
Trade dispute resolution through assistance given by neutral third party. Conducted by the officer from the Department of Industrial Relation where the officer could meet both parties individually or jointly. Assist parties to come to acceptable compromise. Officer serve as kind as technical consultant with no authorities but can provide advice. Average success usually in range of 70 80 % Upon request by the disputant or intervention.
To ease the resolution of trade dispute the IRA 67 provide two vehicle which are the board of inquiry and the community of investigation to perform this task. Appointed by MHR Conduct investigation and not take step to sole the dispute. Committee member-study the cause the trade dispute and make recommendation to MHR. Member of board conduct this activities to submit to House of Representation in Parliament.
JURISDICTION
DEFINITION as the authority given by law to a court to try cases and rule on legal matters within a particular geographic area or over certain types of legal cases UNFAIR DISMISSAL CLAIMS Most of the industrial court cases under IC involve the dismissal of employees, who claims for reinstatement under act 20 of the Industrial Relation Action (IRA). On the average, about 45% of cases of trade dispute claims has been settled and the rest are notified to the MHR who may refer the cases directly to the Industrial Court The workmen who claims their dismissal as unjustified, they might claims for: -> reinstatement -> dismissal without just cause and excuse -> retrenchment
80 70 73
1998
1999 2000 2001
500
485 507 814
72
67 70 80
2002
2003 2004 2005
884
844 1719 2163
81
82 91 90
REINSTATEMENT
WHAT IS IT????? Most of the courts cases concern the dismissal of employee and
allowed to lodge a claim for those who has been dismissed for reinstatement with the Director General of Industrial Relation within 60 days of his dismissal
WHO IS DESERVED???? Only who has declared as a workman through the contract
deserved to claim for reinstatement. If not, the IC is not empowered to hear his/her claims at all.
COURT WILL ORDER THE EMPLOYER TO PAY THE DISMISSED BACK WAGES. THE PROPER PROCEDURE WILL BE FOLLOWED PRIOR TO THE DISMISSAL
RETRENCHMENT
WHY IT HAPPEN???
- Usually occurred in times of recession or financial downturn WHAT DOES IS IT???
fall within the management prerogative categories and notice as an un bargainable matter however it could create the trade dispute between the union and employer, or a claim for unfair dismissal under section 20 of IRA. Term of benefits come under EA 1995 which is the employee cam claims for the non - adherence for the collective agreement Usually the employer likely to use common principle practices such as last in, first out (LIFO)
causes causes
A union, covering employers in a company, undertakes a disputes with the employer over the employment terms and condition.
The majority of the cases are due to the breakdown in collective bargaining between the union and the employer. According to the history of passed cases, the issues that commonly involved are:
THATS ALL FROM US..HOPE WE HAVE SHARE SOME BENEFICIAL KNOWLEDGEMENTS WITH YOUTQ SO MUCHHHH