Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Impact of Wind Energy On Power System Operation: Joris Soens
Impact of Wind Energy On Power System Operation: Joris Soens
| |
=
|
|
\ .
( ) ( )
2
( )
plant
plant plant
P
H D H D P p P = +
H( 0 ) = LOLP = 4 h/year
Assumption: probability that
Total power demand > (reliable capacity + D MW )
Impact of additional power generator (park), with
production probability p( P
plant
)
Introduction
Dynamic
Modelling
Aggregated
Wind Power
Conclusions
43
Introduction
Dynamic
Modelling
Aggregated
Wind Power
Conclusions
-500 0 500 1000 1500 2000
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
D (Demand not served) [MW]
H
(
D
)
[
h
o
u
r
s
/
y
e
a
r
]
Estimated LOLP for Belgium
0 500
4
3
2
1
0
D (Demand not served) [MW]
[hour/year]
= 30
Q
peak
= 13.5 GW
H(0) = 4 h/year
LOLP graphical
LOLP
H (D )
44
-500 0 500 1000
0
1
2
3
4
5
D (Demand not served) [MW]
H
(
D
)
[
h
o
u
r
s
/
y
e
a
r
]
Influence of wind park on H(D)
capacity
credit
extra conventional
power plants
LOLP improvement
H (D)
H
2
(D)
0 500
4
3
2
1
0
Capacity credit graphical
D (Demand not served) [MW]
H (D ) & H
2
(D)
Introduction
Dynamic
Modelling
Aggregated
Wind Power
Conclusions
[hour/year]
45
Absolute capacity credit for
wind power in Belgium
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
0
100
200
300
400
500
Installed wind power [MW]
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
c
r
e
d
i
t
[
M
W
]
Wind power capacity credit for all scenarios
scen I
scen II
scen III
scen IV
1000 2000 3000 4000
0
100
200
300
400
5000
Installed wind power [MW]
Capacity credit
[MW]
Introduction
Dynamic
Modelling
Aggregated
Wind Power
Conclusions
46
Shortcomings of capacity factor/credit
as value indicator
Moment of energy production?
Instantaneous demand for electrical energy?
Energy production in next time sample?
True value indicator must reflect difference of a
chosen paramater, between case with and without
wind power
This requires
Knowledge of entire power system
Dynamic simulation of entire power system
Introduction
Dynamic
Modelling
Aggregated
Wind Power
Conclusions
47
Dynamic simulation of entire
power system (1)
Simulation tool PROMIX (Production Mix)
Input data:
Parameters for all power plants in control area
o Power range
o Costs of start-up and continuous operation
o Time for start-up and power regulation
o Fuel consumption, gas emissions... for various
operating regimes
Time series of aggregated load in control area
(resolution: 1 hour)
Introduction
Dynamic
Modelling
Aggregated
Wind Power
Conclusions
48
Dynamic simulation of entire
power system (2)
Output:
Optimal power generation pattern for every hour
Fuel consumption, emissions, costs... for every plant &
hour
Integrating wind power time series in input data
As equivalent reduction of aggregated load
For large values: reliable wind power required
Results: CO
2
-emission abatement for various
levels of installed wind power
Introduction
Dynamic
Modelling
Aggregated
Wind Power
Conclusions
49
Relative annual abatement of
CO
2
-emission
0 5 10 15 20
0
2
4
6
8
10
Installed wind power [% of system peak demand]
C
O
2
-
e
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
a
b
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
[
%
]
Relative annual CO
2
emission abatement as
function of installed wind power - scenario I
no reliability
1 h reliability
6 h reliability
12 h reliability
24 h reliability
Scenario I
5 10 15 20 0
2
4
6
8
Installed wind power [% of peak demand]
CO
2
emission abatement
[% of reference case]
Introduction
Dynamic
Modelling
Aggregated
Wind Power
Conclusions
50
0 5 10 15 20
0
2
4
6
8
10
Installed wind power [% of system peak demand]
C
O
2
-
e
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
a
b
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
[
%
]
Relative annual CO
2
emission abatement as
function of installed wind power - scenario III
no reliability
1 h reliability
6 h reliability
12 h reliability
24 h reliability
5 10 15 20 0
2
4
6
8
Installed wind power [% of peak demand]
Introduction
Dynamic
Modelling
Aggregated
Wind Power
Conclusions
Relative annual abatement of
CO
2
-emission
Scenario III
CO
2
emission abatement
[% of reference case]
51
Conclusions
Value of wind power
Capacity factor: 20 - 31 % (spreading)
Capacity credit: 30 -10 % (installed power)
CO
2
emission abatement:
Optimum: 4% reduction for installed wind power equal to
5% of peak demand ( = 700 MW)
Introduction
Dynamic
Modelling
Aggregated
Wind Power
Conclusions
52
IV. Conclusions
Introduction
Dynamic
Modelling
Aggregated
Wind Power
Conclusions
53
Conclusions (1)
Technical challenges for wind power integration
are identified
Dynamic models are developed
responding to needs of quantifying higher electrical &
mechanical demands towards wind turbines
detailed dynamic models, assessing all
mechanical/electrical quantities
simplified dynamic models, allowing rough estimates of
wind power absorption potential at busbar
Introduction
Dynamic
Modelling
Aggregated
Wind Power
Conclusions
54
Hourly fluctuations of aggregated wind power in
Belgium are quantified
Value of wind power in Belgium assessed with three
indicators
Capacity factor
Capacity credit
Abatement of CO
2
-emission by total power generation park
> 700 MW installed power:
wind power negative load
Conclusions (2)
Introduction
Dynamic
Modelling
Aggregated
Wind Power
Conclusions
55
Recommendations for
further research
Accurate wind speed forecasting
Integrating forecast updates in implementation of electricity
market
Electricity storage
Demand side management
Impact of wind power on European border-crossing power flows
Introduction
Dynamic
Modelling
Aggregated
Wind Power
Conclusions
Impact of wind energy in a future power grid
Ph.D Joris Soens 15 december 2005, K.U.Leuven
http://hdl.handle.net/1979/161