Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Shadow Banking Final
Shadow Banking Final
Seminar on
TODAYS AGENDA
1
SHADOW BANKS: Introduction to it.
SHADOW BANKS: Prime cause for 2007 crisis. SHADOW BANKING: The Chinese scenario.
2
3
17/7/2013
Access
No Safety nets from FDIC((Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation)
Safety
Trading
Banks do not take deposits instead rely on asset backed C.P and CDOs
2011 -
1.
2.
3. 4. 5.
Make loans. Make securities. Sell securities. Set up (SPVs) Trade (CDOs)
Secured by a mortgage(asset)
Backed by a pool of bonds, loans. An investment-grade security, Do not specialize in one type of debt Often mortgage loans Different types of debt are often referred to as 'tranches' or 'slices
PRIME
NON PRIME SUBPRIME
A short-term investment vehicle With a maturity (90 and 180 days.) Issued by a bank and Companies.
17/7/2013
Shadow Bankers
Asset management firms Bank holding companies Banks, investment Banks, traditional Hedge funds Insurance companies
17/7/2013
17/7/2013
CDOS
C.PS
17/7/2013
IN THE 70S
In 1970 banks were just doing Vanilla banking. Corporate went for C.Ps (started by Coke and
GE)
C.Ps :
1. Short term 2. Risky (comparatively) 3. Not protected
17/7/2013
THE START
CITIGROUP
Known for products with heavy risk hate to lose investors wanted a safe play:(only high rated quality assets). Need was to create a new place of investment vehicle.
NICK SOSSIDIS
17/7/2013
PARTIDGE HICKS
Android of Citi called the ALPHA (The 1st so called shadow bank ever) Not banks, early forms of SPV.
FUNCTIONS
1. 2. 3. Trade in only high rated bonds(strictly) Raise the money though Short term C.Ps. Chances of failing = ZERO
High rated bonds
C.PS
C.PS CDOS
New rules of Umbilical cord High risk Better fee Constant demand
17/7/2013
GORDIAN KNOT
Same as Alpha but didnt have the umbilical cord! Medium term notes (MTN)..LONGER
MATURITY.
17/7/2013
Morgan Stanley
Cheyne
Barclays bank
AVENDIS
17/7/2013
Unlike sigma they were taking huge risks Paradox these were sold to hate to lose investors Investors never knew the CDOs (bad) behind the IOUs. Japanese weren't ready so the their scapegoat were The liquidity flushed MIDDILE EAST NATIONS. The giant CDOs were managed by the HEDGE FUND.
17/7/2013
The housing prices will always soreNO The default loans will not effect the giant CDOs NO Buying the rating companies will always ensure constant demand for shadow products THAT DIG THEIR GARVE. The turmoil began..slowly
17/7/2013
The stage 1, the loans turned bad. MBSS The MBS lost all its market value.
CDO S
The stage 11, the CDO s lost all its value and no inflow of cash. There were millions of unsold CDOs (like rotten onions)
The stage 111, the C.Ps C.PS Matured and the lack of liquidity Made them sell more CDOs for Loss and the Shadow institutions
17/7/2013
17/7/2013
Not really.
It is well diversified and serves a legitimate consumer base. Have much lower leverage than the banks or other Corporate China. Losses often absorbed by the entrepreneurs themselves. They help those in financial repression.
17/7/2013
Total value of WMPs to be 12.14 trillion RMD by 2012. Characterized this shadow banking sector as a potential source of systemic financial risk, whose model is fundamentally a Ponzi scheme.
WMP
BY BANKS
BY TRUSTS
17/7/2013
How it started?
Comparable to CDOs.
17/7/2013
17/7/2013
17/7/2013
SAIRAM 17/7/2013