Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Presentation To U Cop H RV 2
Presentation To U Cop H RV 2
Sustainable Improvement
Based on values and principles Goals that can be expressed as performance expectations Based on an empirically-verifiable behavioral model Measurable results that support learning and performance improvement
2
Sustainable Improvement
Based on values and principles Goals that can be expressed as performance expectations Based on an empirically-verifiable behavioral model Measurable results that support performance improvement
3
No one is rewarded for looking good at the expense of another. Team players are committed to each others success.
Sustainable Improvement
Based on values and principles Goals that can be expressed as performance expectations Based on an empirically-verifiable behavioral model Measurable results that support performance improvement
10
4.
5. 6.
8. 9.
10.
11.
12
Sustainable Improvement
Based on values and principles Goals that can be expressed as performance expectations Based on an empirically-verifiable behavioral model Measurable results that support performance improvement
13
Work groups embrace the same standards of effectiveness Work groups share common values of service, quality, and excellence Work groups are committed to meet the needs of customers
(Q11) (Q12) (Q19)
15
Work groups rate themselves efficient and productive Work groups do not wait for complaints before tackling new problems
(Q20) (Q15)
16
Effectiveness Construct
17
An Emerging Model?
Management behaviors
?
Intermediary Variables?
?
Effectiveness Measures
18
(Q5)
19
When faced with a setback or challenging problem the work group experiences fewer interpersonal problems Group members share expertise when facing a challenging task
(Q7) (Q13)
20
Little concern about whether tasks are divided fairly Problems with the way the work group functions are faced and attended to
(Q17)
(Q21)
21
Partial Model
Workplace Cooperation Measures (9 measures)
= .89
r = .74
22
Partial Model
Management behaviors
?
Intermediary Variables?
?
Workplace Cooperation Measures
r = .74
Workplace Effectiveness Measures
24
Partial Model
Workplace Respect Measures (6 measures)
= .87
r = .74
Effectiveness Measures (7 measures)
= .90
25
Interpersonal conflicts are addressed and resolved People can criticize the way the work group functions without penalty
(Q22) (Q8)
26
People can share (work) problems without concern about appearing stupid Co-workers experience a climate of mutual respect
(Q9) (Q4)
27
Partial Model
Workplace Respect Measures (6 measures)
= .87
r = .77
28
Supports equal opportunity Cares about employees as individuals Finds "win-win" solutions Communicates honestly with me Accepts constructive criticism without becoming defensive Keeps promises and commitments Rewards the best performers Seeks different views when solving problems Acts in ways that build respect in him/her Makes me feel stupid when we disagree Makes excuses rather than accept responsibility
30
35
36
37
Rewards initiative
(Q24.24)
Will try new, potentially better methods Treats new ideas with respect
(Q24.22)
(Q24.8)
38
(Q24.23)
39
40
Takes steps to improve bad relationships (Q24.4) Takes action to resolve interpersonal conflicts (Q24.10) Finds win/win solutions (Q24.6) Learns from his/her mistakes (Q24.21) Sorts essential from unimportant information (Q23.13)
41
42
44
(Q24.9)
(Q24.12)
(Q24.17)
(Q24.18)
46
Management Detractors
My supervisor... Loses temper under pressure
(Q24.29) (Q24.28)
Makes some people look good at others expense Discourages bringing up problems Favors an in group of subordinates Waits until a problem escalates before acting Makes subordinates feel stupid when they disagree
(Q24.25) (Q24.27) (Q24.30) (Q24.26)
47
r = .63 (r = -.79)
48
Sustainable Improvement
Based on values and principles Goals that can be expressed as performance expectations Based on an empirically-verifiable behavioral model Measurable results that support performance improvement
51
52
I know about and understand the data my unit uses to measure its performance
When work problems surface my co-workers produce information and ideas that help solve the problem
53
Sensitivity Analysis
Management Detractors (6 behaviors)
FAQs
Can the survey be gamed? Minimum N for valid results? Can results be used to evaluate individuals performance? What scores amount to a wake-up call? What can a manager do about low scores?
55
Thank You
UC I
University of California, Irvine
www.abs.uci.edu
56