Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kuliah Blok Neoplasma - Januari 2011
Kuliah Blok Neoplasma - Januari 2011
Dr. Yanto Budiman, Sp.Rad., M.Kes Bagian Radiologi FK/RS Atma Jaya Jakarta
Imaging is emerging as an important adjunct to the clinical assessment of cancer, contributing to : Tumor detection, Characterization, Staging, Treatment planning and follow-up.
Diagnostic Tools
Rontgen X-ray USG CT Scan MRI Nuclear Medicine
NUCLEAR MEDICINE :
Gamma Camera SPECT PET Scan
Bone Scintigraphy
Nuclear medicine 99mTc-MDP Mechanism : Radiopharmaceuticals(99mTc-MDP) , will be uptaken by osteoblast chemically bone metabolic activities (increase/decrease radiopharmaceuticals uptake)
Key Points
X-rays always first line Ultrasound best second test MRI best overall for
Characterisation Staging & extent Progress evaluation
Role of Imaging
Confirmation
Mass? What mass?
Classification
Normal or variant Developmental Benign or non-aggressive Indeterminate/Suspicious/Malignant
X-Rays Crucial
Characteristic tissues detectable
Gas Fat Soft tissues Calcium & bone
Role of Ultrasound
Easily distinguish solid from cystic Inexpensive, quick, rapid comparison Detect hypervascularity (Doppler) Excellent depiction of superficial mass relationships Guide needle biopsy
Benign Masses
ST Calcinosis
MFH
High signal heterogeneous mass with internal septations and marked rim enhancement (MRI)
Conclusions
Imaging is not histology Clinical evaluation critical X-rays ALWAYS first Ultrasound second MRI next Imaging classification before surgery
Bone Neoplasms
Variant?
Yes
Yes
BIOPSY
Path-Rad Correlation
Diagnostic Gamut
Developmental Dysplastic/dystrophic Traumatic Metabolic Infective Ischaemic necrosis Tumour-like conditions Tumours
Why X-Rays?
Mandatory for MSK lesions
New bone formation Periosteal reaction Bone expansion & growth Lesion boundaries Host marginal reaction Patterns of destruction
Still the most specific imaging modality for most bone lesions
Age at Diagnosis
Age 1 Tumo urs
N e ur o blast o ma 110 Ewing sar co ma (t ubular ) 1030 O st e o sar co ma, Ewing (flat ) 3040 N HL, MFH, fibr o sar co ma, GC T, par o st e al o st e o sar co ma 40+ Me t ast asis, mye lo ma, cho ndr o sar co ma
X-Ray Features
Pattern of bone destruction or sclerosis Internal architecture & density Expansion, endosteal scalloping Periosteal reaction & new bone formation Soft tissue mass
RCC Metastasis
Ewings Sarcoma
Osteosarcoma
Diaphyseal Aclasia
Nonossifying Fibroma
1.METASTATIC BONE TUMORS 2.PRIMARY MALIGNANT BONE TUMORS Multiple myeloma Osteosarcoma Ewings Sarcoma 3.PRIMARY QUASIMALIGNANT BONE TUMOR Giant Cell Tumor
4.PRIMARY BENIGN BONE TUMORS Osteochondroma Osteoma Bone island Osteoid osteoma Simple bone cyst Aneurysmal bone cyst
Insidence
70% are metastatic, 30% are primary In females 70% from breast Ca In males 60% from prostate Ca
Metastatic.. (contd)
Radiologic Features
Technetium bone scan 80% of all metastase are located in the central or axial skeleton - Spine and Pelvis being a most common Alteration in bone density and architecture 75% osteolytic, moth eaten or permeative 15% osteoblastic Periosteal respose is rare
Prostatic Metastases
Multiple myeloma
Primary bone tumor Bone scan are cold Gross Osteoporosis may be the only early sign Punched out lesions Preservation of pedicles
Multiple Myeloma
Osteosarcoma
75% of cases occurs in the 10 to 25 age Metaphyses of the distal femur, proximal humerus are the most common sites Permeative or ivory medulary lesion in metaphysis of a long tubular bone A sunburst or sunray periosteal response Cortical disruption with soft tissue mass formation Sclerotic Lytic Mixed lesion
Osteosarcoma
Ewings Sarcoma
Most cases occur in the 10 25 age range May mimic infection Diaphyseal permeative lesion Femur, tibia and fibula Onion skin periosteal response Most common primary malignant bone tumor to metastasize to bone
Ewings Sarcoma
onion-skin
Osteochondroma
Respiratory Neoplasm
Pleural tumor
Benign Lipoma - Fibroma - Angioma Malignant - Mesothelioma - Sarcoma
Mesothelioma
* From the endothelial pleural layer * 2 type: - Nodular : > often - Diffuse haemorrhagic effusion
Metastase :
From bronchogenic Ca (40%) From Mammae Ca (20%) From Lymphosarcoma (10%)
Mesothelioma
Pulmonary Carcinoma
a. Bronchogenic Ca
- Most common - Male > Female - Right > often - Age : 50 60 y.o. - Related : Smoking, radioactive/industry material, TBC - Classified into : a. Central type b. Perifer nodular c. Pneumonic type d. Miliary type
Bronchogenic Ca
A Posteroanterior (PA) chest radiograph demonstrates a spiculated right upper lobe mass. B Chest CT (lung window) demonstrates a peripheral mass with spiculated borders
b. Pancoasts tumor
Posterior superior pulmonary sulcus tumor Posterior costae 1- 3 destruction with vertebral erosion Cervicalis symphatis paralysis Horner syndrome
Pancoasts tumor
3. Alveolar cell ca
= Pulmonary adenomatosis
Female = Male 40 years Ro: Small nodules on both lung field with large masses in right pulmonary base No visible node enlargement but shows nodal consolidation in perihiler Pleura ussualy not affected Heart normal
Alveolar cell ca
4. Hamartoma
Overgrowth of few tissue such as smooth muscle fibrous cartilage tissue and vascular Ro : Round/oval/lobulated shadow with soft tissue density, well-defined border, diameter 2.5 9 cm. Calsification inside : pop corn calcification
Hamartoma
Metastase intrapulmonal
GI Tract Neoplasm
Abdominal Imaging In the hollow organ segments of the GI tract, contrast imaging studies remain the cornerstone in characterizing the tumor, but lack the ability to stage the tumor, either in terms of depth of penetration through the wall or in defining regional nodal involvement. CT Scan remains the most widely used for axial imaging Magnetic resonance imaging has shown only limited advantage over CT
Ca oesophagus
Radiographic appearances: - A sharply circumscribed filling defect projecting within the lumen Malignant tumors of the stomach: Gross morphologic types: - Ulcerative (28%) - Fungating/polypod (22%) - Spreading/infiltrating (13%) - Remainder unclassifiable
Ulcerating leiomyoma
lobulated villous adenocarcinoma arising at junction of second and third parts of duodenum.
Spot image of adenocarcinoma of the duodenum presenting as a classic tight annular apple core lesion in the second part of the duodenum
Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. unenhanced scan (A), CT shows an enlargement of the head,within which a hypodense mass is recognizable after contrast medium (B). The tumor looks smaller in the venous phase due to the peripheral enhancement (C)
Malignant tumours: - Lymphoma (the commonest) - Leiomyosarcoma - Carcinoid - Metastases (malignant melanoma & bronchial ca)
Malignant lymphoma
Colorectal tumors
Polyps: - A mucosal elevation - Radiographic appearance: * Bowler-hat sign * En face: target sign
Colorectal cancer: - The commonest cancers in western Europe & US - Men = women - Tumours tend to be right-sided - May be associated urinary tract & gynaecological malignancy
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal cancer
Fungating type: - Medullary carcinoma - Sites: caecum, ascending colon, rectum - Complication: bleeding, fistula Polypoid type: - Sites: ascending colon usually - Complication: Intussusception
Annular type: - Mucoid adenocarcinoma, scirrhous fibrocarcinoma - Sites: sigmoid, descending colon, flexures - Complication: fistula, obstruction
Radiological appearances: - Filling defect - Obstruction
Polip colon
Liver malignancy
USG
CT Scan
Cranial Neoplasm
INTRACRANIAL MASSES
1. Radiografic Characteristic of Lesion
a. Intrinsic CT density
b. Contrast enhancement BBB (ring, gyriform, homogenous) c. Multiple lesions d. MR appearance
A. Primary Tumor
1. Glioma a. Astrocytoma b. Ependymoma c. Oligodendroglioma d. Ganglioglioma
2. Meningioma 3. Lymphoma
B. Metastatic Tumor
Diagnosa banding berdasarkan pola Enhancement lesi pada parenkim otak A. Cerebral parenchymal lesion Ring : - Glioma - Meta - Abcess - Resolving hematoma - Resolving infarction Homogenous : - Lymphoma
Lymphoma
Breast Neoplasm
BIRADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System)= Standardised Terminology, American College of Radiology
Needs further views/comp Normal Benign Probably benign Suspicious for malignancy Probable malignancy Proven or known malignancy
Category 1 & 2
Benign with <1% chance of cancer
Category 3
Probably benign with <2% chance of cancer Most problematic category Cannot use this well without local audit
BIRADS Category 4
All require initial biopsy 4A Low suspicion of malignancy
Palpable lesion, atypical FA, complex cyst etc. Benign biopsy expected = discharge or short-term FU
4B Intermediate suspicion
Lesion with suspicious features Benign biopsy = close correlation, ?re-biopsy
4C Moderate suspicion
Not classic for CA Prominent suspicious features Benign biopsy not expected = should re-biopsy or excise
MAMMOGRAPHY
X-Ray dosis rendah Massa < 5 mm Massa tidak teraba Tanda keganasan Check-up post operasi Tidak invasif
Indikasi :
Benjolan Rasa tidak enak pada mammae Keluarnya cairan dari puting susu Kelainan kulit mammae Cancer Phobia Post operasi Skrining
Mengapa Skrining Harus Dilakukan ? Ca mammae > usia 35 th Kapan Skrining Diperlukan? Usia 35 th Usia 35 50 th 2 atau 3 th Usia > 50 th Setiap tahun
Kranio-kaudal
Mediolateral-oblique
Kriteria Keganasan
Tanda Primer :
Lesi Radioopak irreguler
Mikrokalsifikasi
Tanda Sekunder :
Penebalan & retraksi kulit Vaskularisasi Posisi papila & areola berubah Jar. fibroglandular tidak teratur Distorsi lemak retromammae Metastasis KGB aksila
Mammogram
Batas tegas Densitas lemak?
Ya Lipoma, fat necrosis Hamartoma Galactocele, LN Tidak
USG
Anechoic
Kista
kompleks
Hematoma, Papillary Tumor
Kista
Fibroadenoma
Batas tegas? Ya Densitas lemak ? Tidak USG? Hipoechoic
Vascular calcification
Secretory calcifications
Dilated duct with periductal inflammation Thick linear, rod like calcification, internal lucency Radiate from the retroareolar area Follow the course of the ducts Usually bilateral
Rim calcification
Lucent calcification
Dermal calcification
ULTRASONOGRAPHY
USG
Indikasi
Wanita muda, hamil atau menyusui Mammografi abnormal Klinis (+), mammografi (-) Peradangan payudara Pembengkakan payudara laki-laki Biopsi / aspirasi Follow up
Tanda Sekunder
Penebalan kulit Perubahan jaringan Kekakuan Lig. Cooperi
Tes Dinamik
Efek kompresi Mobilitas
TECHNIQUE
Bersama-sama Mammografi
Ultrasonografi
97 % 95 %
78 %
Malignant Lesion