Cost Index: Gates Per Chip Chips Per Board Crosspoints Per Board

You might also like

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 14

Cost Index

 Gates per chip


 Chips per board
 Crosspoints per board
 Number of crosspoints in the switching
network
 Reference network


Crossbar network N x M

N=M cost index = N2

Non-blocking

Multi-stage networks

1
4 x 4 Crossbar Switch

A1 A1

A2 A2

A3 A3

A4 A4

B1 B2 B3 B4 B1 B2 B3 B4

2
Crosspoint Switch
 Electromechanical
 Switching speed : 1-10 ms

 Minimal wear & adjustments

 Ex. Miniswitches- mechanically latch, speed 8-10 ms

Reed relays-mechanical motion of bars


eliminated,
electrical contacts made of magnetic
material in a sealed glass,
Displacement: 0.2 mm
Switching time < 1 ms
electrical / magnetic latching
 Electronic
 Diode crosspoints, transistorised (Bipolar/FET), N2

 FDM switching: FT-TR, expensive, 2N devices

 TDM switching: relatively economical

3
SWITCHING
 SPACE SWITCHING
Full availability
 Limited availability


Grading

Multi-stage switching

Blocking condition

 TIME SWITCHING

 COMBINATION SWITCHING
4
Multistage networks
 N x M ; s stages

 ri switch matrices of order ni x mi at stage i

 N = n 1r1 ; M = msrs

 ith stage
 No. of outlets/switch x no. of switch matrices at

ith stage = No. of inlets/ switch x no. of switch


matrices at (i+1)th stage
 m r = n
i i i+1 ri+1
 (0 ≤ i ≤ s-1 )

 Type of interconnection
5
Interstage pattern configuration
 Full connection (FC)
 If each matrix in stage i (i = 2,…. s-1)

is connected to all the matrices in


stage i -1 and i +1

 Partial Connection (PC)


 If each matrix in stage i (i = 2,…. s-1)

is not connected to all the matrices in


stage
i -1 and i +1

6
FC  No. of outlets/switch at ith stage
≥ No. of switch matrices in (i+1)th
stage
mi ≥ ri+1
PC  No. of outlets/switch at ith stage
< No. of switch matrices in (i+1)th
stage
mi < ri+1

7
Full Connection Multi-stage networks
 Matrices in adjacent stages  always
connected by atleast one link
 ni x mi Switch matrix  crossbar network
 ni = ri-1 ; mi-1 = ri ( i = 2,….s )

0 0 0 0
n-1 m-1 n-1 m-1

0 0 0 0
n-1 m-1 n-1 m-1
1 2 s-1 s
8
Full Connection Multi-stage
networks(Cont.d)
 Two stage FC network
 Accessibility  full

 Blocking  single link between matrices of

adjacent
stages

 Three stage FC network


 Different I/O paths available between any couple of

matrices  switching capacity


 Full accessibility

 Non-blocking condition determined by number of

second stage switch matrices

 Centralized control and storage of state of


terminations and interstage links  complex
algorithm for rearrangeable networks
9
Partial Connection Multistage
networks
 Features:
 Intermediate stage switch matrix 

connected to a subset of adjacent stages


 Availability of high degree of parallel

processing
 Small matrices ( switching elements SE , 2

x 2) with autonomous processing


capability

 Necessity:
 High speed packet switched

communication networks
 To carry very large amount of traffic

 To change network permutation at a very

high rate

State duration of the order of few µs
10
Multistage link system
 N x N single stage with SC = K
 Two stages:
N inlets NxK KxN N
outlets
K links
‘r’ Full connectivity
switches or full availability
‘s’ switches

pxs rxq

M N M = p.r
inlets outlets N = q.s

pxs rxq

11
Route Switch
 M=N  N x N switch
 Let p = q = n inlets per Primary Switch
 & r = s = g = N/n switches in each stage
 No. of XPs S  2 N2/ n
 Switching Capacity SC  g2 = ( N/n )2 ≤ N
 Letting SC = N, n = √N & S = 2 N 3/2

nxg gxn

N N
inlets outlets

nxg gxn
‘g’ switches ‘g’ switches 12
Design Example (1)
 Requirement : 200 x 200 Route switch with SC = 200
 SC = N = 200
 n = √N = 14.14… , to be an integer & also a factor of N
 Case I :
 Let n = 10 

 No. of Primary switches = ?

 No. of Secondary switches = ?

 No. of XPs per PS = ?

 No. of XPs per SS = ?

 Total no. of XPs =

 No. of concurrent paths between IT & OT = ?

 Case II :
 Let n = 20 

13
Concentrator Design
 M inlets > N outlets
 Inlets per PS = m (p)

 Outlets per SS = n (q)

 No. of Primary switches = M/m

 No. of Secondary switches = N/n

 No. of XPs per PS = mN/n

 No. of XPs per SS = Mn/m

 Total no. of XPs S = MN ( 1/n + 1/m )

 Switching Capacity SC = MN/mn ≤ N

 n = M/m  S = MN ( m/M + 1/m )


 m
opt = nopt = √ M
 S
min = 2 N √ M
 No. of concurrent paths between IT & OT = ?

 EXPANDER SWITCH  M inlets < N outlets

14

You might also like