PHASE II FINAL REVIEW

11-07-2013

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF MIXER EJECTOR SYSTEM FOR OPTIMIZED THRUST PERFORMANCE
GUIDED BY, Mr. J.BRUCE RALPHIN ROSE, Asst. Prof, Dept of Aeronautical Engg, Regional Center of Anna University , Tirunelveli Regional -627007.

PRESENTED BY, A.BHARATHITHASAN, Reg No:950011404004, II Year M.E AERONAUTICAL, Regional Center of Anna University , Tirunelveli Regional -627007.

OBJECTIVE
A mixer ejector nozzle system performance is based on length of the nozzle ,amount of noise reduction and thrust loss. In this proposed work, Mixer ejector are used for verifying the nozzle thrust output by creating different effects. One effective way to reduce noise is to decrease the intensity of the turbulent mixing of the jet exhaust with the surrounding air by decreasing the exhaust jet velocity. The thrust increase is are result of ejector inlet suction forces generated by the secondary flow accelerating around the inlet contour.

PROBLEM IDENTIFIED
Noise reduction during take off and landing Increase in thrust Accelerating the mass flow rate

LITERATURE SURVEY
SL.N TITLE O 1 AUTHOR INFERENCE YEAR

SUPERSONIC NOZZLE T. G. Tillman* Ejectors are a MIXER EJECTOR and R. W. candidate means to Patersont reduce jet noise of commercial supersonic 1992 aircraft during takeoff and landing.

NOZZLE THRUST J. M. Seiner & Nozzle design OPTIMIZATION WHILE M. M. Gilinsky concept is proposed for REDUCING JET NOISE jet noise reduction with minimal thrust loss or even thrust Augmentation. The thrust 1996 calculations also indicated amplitude and increase nozzle parameter.

SL.N TITLE O 3

AUTHOR

INFERENCE

YEAR

HIGH REYNOLDS SJohn NUMBER ANALYSIS OF Carlson FLAT PLATE AND SEPARATED AFTERBODY FLOW USING NON-LINEAR TURBULENCE MODEL

R Subsonic flat plate boundary-layer flow parameters such as normalized velocity 1996 distributions, local and average skin friction, and shape factor. Jet mixing aerodynamics is vital to several areas of commercial and military aircraft design, such as jet propulsion 1997 efficiency, propulsion integration, aero acoustics, and jet interference with aircraft structure

NUMERICAL S. Paul Pao& SIMULATION OF JET Khaled S. AERODYNAMICS USING Abdol-Hamid THE THREEDIMENSIONAL NAVIERSTOKES CODE PAB3D

SL.N TITLE O 5

AUTHOR

INFERENCE

YEAR

Experimental, Theoretical, Craig and Computational Hunter Investigation of Separated Nozzle Flows

A. Over expanded nozzle flow was dominated by shock induced boundary layer separation, which was divided into two distinct flow regions. Results indicate that 1998 with controlled separation, the entire over expanded range of nozzle performance would be within 10% of the peak thrust efficiency.

Computational Investigation of Counterflow Vectoring

C.A.Hunter and A computational study Fluidic K.A.Deere of fluidic counter flow Thrust thrust vectoring has 1999 been conducted.

SL.N TITLE O 7

AUTHOR

INFERENCE

YEAR

THRUST T.G.Tillman & Mixer ejectors are a CHARACTERISTICS OF W.M.Presz Jr candidate means to mix A SUPERSONIC MIXER out the high-velocity. EJECTOR mixer ejectors can provide rapid mixing of 1999 a supersonic jet for acoustic benefits all while increasing aircraft system static thrust

THRUST W. Presz, Jr., G. AUGMENTATION WITH Reynolds & C. MIXER/EJECTOR Hunter SYSTEMS

Thrust performance predictions, and thrust augmentation capability 2002 of mixer Ejector system.

METHODOLOGY
CATIA ANSYS

CHARACTERISTICS OF MIXER EJECTOR NOZZLE

The performance of such mixerejectors is important in aircraft engine applications for noise suppression and thrust augmentation. Information on the mixing, pumping, ejector wall pressure distribution, thrust augmentation and noise suppression characteristics of four simple, multi-element, jet mixerejector configurations is presented. The four configurations included the effect of ejector area ratio (AR=ejector cross-sectional area/total primary nozzle area) and the effect of non-parallel ejector walls. The ejector is produced the maximum pumping (secondary (induced) flow normalized by the primary flow) also exhibited the lowest wall pressures in the inlet region, and the maximum thrust augmentation.

2D-Mixer Ejector model

NOZZLE DESIGN
DESIGNING NOZZLE BY USING CATIA DESIGNING MIXER/EJECTOR MODEL OPERATING CONDITION (Mach Number, Pressure, Temperature)

NOZZLE DIMENSION

MIXER/EJECTOR MODEL BY CATIA

RECTANGULAR SHAPE

C-SHAPE

TRIANGULAR SHAPE

NOZZLE MESH MODEL

Tetra hetra elements can be used to mesh any volumes. The parameter geometry finite model of mixer in shown above, which consists of 41032 nodes and 206645 elements.

MESHING OF MIXER EJECTOR MODEL

TRI ANGULAR SHAPE

C-SHAPE

BOUNDARY CONDITION

S.NO

PARAMETER

VALUE

1 2 3 4

Vp Vs Ts Tp

32 m/s 17 m/s 350 K 500 k

VELOCITY VARIATION

From the above fig shows that at the C-Shape mixer ejector nozzle ,the was 9.05e+01 at vp = 32m/s,Vs=17 m/s Tp = 500k,Ts =300 k

From the above fig shows that at the rectangualr mixer ejector nozzle,the was 8.63e+01 at vp = 32m/s,Vs=17 m/s Tp = 500k,Ts =300 k

VELOCITY VARIATION

From the fig shows that at the triangular mixer ejector ,the was 8.63e+01 at vp = 32m/s,Vs=17 m/s Tp = 500k,Ts =300 k

THRUST AUGUMENTATION VS MASS FLOW RATE

3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 ms/mp 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 ms/mp

Fig(a)RECTANGULAR
4 2 0 0 -2 1 2 3

Fig(b)TRIANGULAR

Fig ( c )C-SHAPE

-4 -6

-8
-10 ms vs mp

THRUST AUGUMENTATION VS VELOCITY

3.5 3 2.5 1 0.5 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 va vs vp 0.8 1 1.2 0 0.2 0.4 va vs vp 0.6 0.8 1 2.5 2 1.5

2
1.5 1 0.5 0

fig (d)C-SHAPE
3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 va vs vp 0.8

Fig ( e ) TRIANGULAR

1.2

fig (f) RECTANGULAR

DISTANCE VS VELOCITY
100 90 80 70 velocity,m/s 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 5 distance,m 10 15 120 100

velocity,m/s

80
60 40 20 0 0 2 4 6 8 distance,m 10 12 14 16

Fig (g )C-SHAPE
100 90 80

Fig (h)RECTANGUALR

70
velocity,m/s 60 50 40 30 20 10

0
0 2 4 6 8 distance,m 10 12 14 16

Fig (i) TRIANGULAR

DISCUSSION
Figure (a) to (c )presents ejector thrust augmentation versus pumping. These results predict that an ejector always increases the static thrust of a nozzle. An ideal augmenter thrust curve is also presented for comparison purposes. Graph was plotted thrust augmentation versus various mass flow rate at various shape of the mixer ejector ,like this rectangular ,c -shape and triangular. Figure (d) to (f) Thrust augmentation is as a function of the ratio of airplane speed to the primary jet velocity (i.e. Va/Vp). Ejector thrust gains are seen to be a maximum at static operation, and to decrease asymptotically to zero as the ejector forward velocity approaches the primary flow velocity. As the airplane flight speed increases, the ingested secondary flow momentum increases. This secondary flow momentum has to be subtracted from the thrust generated by the ejector, and thus results in lower ejector system thrust. Graph is plotted various shape of mixer ejector ,like this c shape ,rectangular shape and triangular shape. Fig (g) (i) presents various velocity versus nozzle length distance. The velocity changed by the various shape of mixer ejector nozzle .they are C-shape ,rectangular and triangular.

CONCLUSION
The mixer/ejector nozzle is designed and nozzle will be optimized with varying parameters and analyzed. Mixer/ejector exhaust systems provide a simple means of reducing the jet noise on older aircraft. Properly designed mixer/ejectors can increase engine bypass ratio while generating an increase in static thrust. The thrust increase is are result of ejector inlet suction forces generated by the secondary flow accelerating around the inlet contour. The same inlet contour also directs the secondary flow into the ejector for low loss mixing. The design of the ejector shroud inlet is critical to the performance of a mixer/ejector system. As the airplane speed increases, the secondary flow accelerates less around the inlet lip resulting in lower lip suction forces, and therefore lower thrust augmentation. This loss in thrust is a result of inlet ram drag. Compared the various type of mixer ejector shape with various velocity. Then found out thrust was increased in exit area.

REFERENCE
1. Heiser, William H., Thrust Augmentation, ASME Paper 66-GT-l 16, 1966. 2. Presz, W., Morin B., and Gousy, R., Forced Mixer Lobes in Ejector Designs, Paper No. 86-1614, AIAA 22nd Joint Propulsion Conference, June, 1986.

3. Tillman, G., and Presz, W., Thrust Characteristics of a Supersonic Mixer Ejector, Paper No. 93-4345, 15th AIAA Aeroacoustical Conference, October, 1993.
4. Presz, W., Reynolds, G. and McMormick, D., Thrust Augmentation Using Mixer / Ejector / Diffuser Systems, Paper No. 94-0020, AIAA 32- Aerospace Science Meeting, January 1994. Presz, W., Mixer/Ejector Noise Suppressors, Paper No. 91-2243, AIAA 27th Joint Propulsion Conference, June, 1991.

5.

6. Presz, W. and Reynolds, G., Alternating Lobed Mixer/Ejector Concept Suppressor, ALMEC Suppressor, United States Patent 5,884,472, March, 1999
7. Bernstein, A., Heiser, W. and Hevenor, C., Compound Compressible Nozzle Flow, Paper No. 66-663, AIAA 2nd Propulsion Joint Specialist Conference, June, 1966.

8.

Pao, S.P., and Abdol-Hamid, K.S., Numerical Simulation of Jet Aerodynamics Using a Three Dimensional Navier Stokes Method (PAB3D), NASA TP-3596, September 1996. Hunter, C.A., Experimental, Theoretical, and Computational Investigation of Separated Nozzle Flows, AIAA 98-3107, July 1998.

9.

10. Hunter, C.A. and Deere, K.A., Computational Simulation of Fluidic Counterflow Thrust Vectoring, AIAA 99-2669, June 1999.
Presented a technical paper on Design and analysis of Mixer Ejector nozzle for a optimized thrust performance at National level conference on emerging Trends in Mechanical Engineering on 12th april 2013.

Preparing a journal to publish in journal of mechanical science .

THANK YOU