Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Report Masjid Sri Gombak
Report Masjid Sri Gombak
MEMBERS INVOLVED
NO. 1. 2. 3. NAME MATRIC NO
MUHAMMAD FARID BIN IBRAHIM MOHD RAZIEMI BIN RUSLAN NUR DIANA BINTI KHAIRUDDIN
4.
PHOTOGRAPHER, ANALYZER
PHOTOGRAPHER, ANALYZER PERSON WITH WHEEL CHAIR, CRUCHES PERSON
5.
6.
MASJID KHAIRIYAH
INTRODUCTION
Masjid Khairiyah Sri Gombak is located at Taman Sri Gombak, Batu Caves, Selangor Access audit exercise has been done starting from the entrance up to the main prayer area which at the ground floor level The spaces involved are incuding the entrance, ablution area, toilet and main prayer hall
SITE LOCATION
NO 1 2 3 4 5 6
MAIN PRAYER HALL STAIRCASE ACCESS NEAREST ASSEMBLY POINT NEAREST GUARD HOUSE CONNECTIVITY PARKING AREA DROP OFF AREA
5 a b
2 6 3
NO X Y
NO a b
DATA COLLECTION
CHILDREN
Definition: A human being below the age of 18 years unless under the law applicable to the child. Behavior :
Behavior patterns may often be explosive and unpredictable. Greatly excited by anything new. Children's way of thinking has obvious intuitive, they love imitation, lively, curious, like to play with the companions, has the rich body language. Specific image and lively environment tend to attract the attention of young children.
Character:
Good supply of energy, running, jumping and other large movements Curiosity is active
EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT
ACCESS AUDIT : ENTRANCE NO 1 ELEMENT MAIN ENTRANCE ANALYSIS
1. Entrance of the building is easily accessible for disabled users. No doors blocking at the entrance. Gradient of the ramp at the main entrance is 1:6, it is too steep for wheel chair user. No Railing at the steps at the entrance. Landing at the stairs have a minimum distance of 1.5 meters No guiding block/warning tactile at both side of ramp area
PROPOSAL
2. 3.
4. 5.
6.
2.At landing should provide warning tactile, follow MS 1331:2003, refer to figure 10 a)/ms-14 3. To provide rest area min. 1200mm in length at interval not more than 6000mm, follow MS1331:2003 4. As part of information/ transition on changes of path usage esp for blind sight user
EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT
PARKING AREA AND PATHWAY NO ELEMENT Parking ANALYSIS
1. No accessible parking provided for OKU
No international symbol of access, imprinted on parking ground
PROPOSAL
2.
1.
EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT
PARKING AREA AND PATHWAY NO ELEMENT Pathways at Main Entrance ANALYSIS
1. No tactile guiding blocks provided at the main entrance and pathway surrounding as references for the vision impaired persons along the way to enter the mosque. 2. No warning blocks provided at the crucial area to indicate the obstruction. eg: Fencing and drop at main entrance, riser at the external ablution area 3. No manholes placed outside the pedestrian path of travel 2. Provide warning blocks around any obstruction MS 1331:2003, refer to figure 10 a)/ms-14
PROPOSAL
1.
EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT
PARKING AREA AND PATHWAY NO ELEMENT Pathways ANALYSIS
1. The pathway surrounding is clear of steps and obstruction. 2. No guiding blocks installed along the line of travel. 3. The surface level is smooth and non-slippery
PROPOSAL
1.
2. Provide warning blocks around any obstruction MS 1331:2003, refer to figure 10 a)/ms-14
EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT
PARKING AREA AND PATHWAY NO ELEMENT Pathways towards the external ablution ANALYSIS
1. The surface level is smooth but the material of tile used was slippery 2. No guiding blocks installed along the line of travel towards the external ablution. 3. No warning blocks provided to indicate the ablution area. 1. Provide tactile guarding block , installed along the line of travel
PROPOSAL
2. Provide warning blocks around any obstruction MS 1331:2003, refer to figure 10 a)/ms-14
EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT
RAMPS NO ELEMENT RAMP @ENTRANCE ANALYSIS
1. Ramp gradient 1:6 at the first ramp width 1.4 m
PROPOSAL
1. Ramp should be 1:12, follow MS 1184 : 2002, refer to item 5.2.
2. Should allow for at least 1200mm length landing. Refer to MS 1184:2002, item 5.2.
3. No guiding block 4.Ramp gradient 1:10 after the first ramp width 2m
EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT
RAMPS NO ELEMENT RAMP @TOILET ANALYSIS
1. Ramp gradient 1:10
PROPOSAL
1. Ramp should be 1:12, follow MS 1184 : 2002, refer to item 5.2.
2. Should allow for at least 1200mm length landing. Refer to MS 1184:2002, item 5.2.
4. Should allow for guiding block for blind sight user. 5. Should be slightly gentle or allow for step ramp, MS 1184:2002, refer to item 7.1. Material should be non-slip.
EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT
RAILINGS NO ELEMENT RAILINGS ANALYSIS
1. No railing
PROPOSAL
1. Provide railing along the RAMP follow MS 1331:2003 (Figure 7a-m/s 11)
EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT
STAIRS NO ELEMENT STAIR ANALYSIS
1.No handrail on right side 2.No warning tiles 3.Too steep
PROPOSAL
1. Provide handrail follow MS 1331:2003 (Figure 7b-m/s 11)
INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT
NO ELEMENT ABLUTION AREA ANALYSIS
1. No Signage and braille text for blind user
PROPOSAL
2. No Railing surrounding the ablution area and towards it for support and guiding
1. Should provide signage for guidance. Pictogram with emboss signage type and braille text. Font size should be bigger for blind sight people. (Manual Audit-ms 076)
2. Provide railing at ablution area and towards it for elderly, ambulatory and blind user
INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT
NO ELEMENT ABLUTION AREA ANALYSIS
3. No guiding block towards ablution area and warning block as to different level of the ablution area
PROPOSAL
3. Provide guiding block , installed along the line of travel towards the ablution area for blind sight user and provide warning blocks around any obstruction MS 1331:2003, refer to figure 10 a)/ms-14
EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT
NO ELEMENT ANALYSIS 4. No slip resistant at ablution area PROPOSAL
EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT
ELEMENT ANALYSIS 5. Not accessible to wheelchair PROPOSAL
5. Provide area that accessible to wheelchair user such as wall mounted ablution area or designed modular wudu station, accommodating a combination of standing, seated and, if required, wheelchair-based users. 6. Obstruction along path 6. Provide clear width for wheelchair user
INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT
TOILET NO 5 ELEMENT TOILET
1.Door provided is too narrow for the to enter. Door Width : 0.8 m 2.Toilet provided not suitable to be used by the disable people because: no grab bar for disable there is big drop in the toilet the door is open inside to the toilet Drop height : 0.1 m 1. Provide OKU toilet follow the Malaysia Standard (Manual audit akses 1 malaysia-m/s 92)
ANALYSIS
PROPOSAL
2.
to avoid having the drop in toilet as the drop will makes the disabled person more difficult in accessing the toilet
Reduce the sinks height (Manual audit akses 1 malaysiam/s 92)
3. 3.Sink too high for the OKU wheelchair users to use and there is no lower sink for wheelchair and children users Sink height : 0.9 mwheelchair
4.No OKU signage for disabled person 4. Provide OKU with braille signage
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the design of Masjid Khairiyah does consider the disable person in certain areas, but most of the provision do not meet the standard required according to Malaysian Standard Some of the area does not consider the disable person at all However there are still rooms for improvement and measures can be taken to ensure the accessibility for the disable people Finally, this case study should be a good lesson to learn for every architects and future designers.
THANK YOU