Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Analysis On The Impact of Madrid Protocol For The Economies of Developing Countries
Analysis On The Impact of Madrid Protocol For The Economies of Developing Countries
Analysis On The Impact of Madrid Protocol For The Economies of Developing Countries
1 IPO-Pakistan
The basic difference between the two routes are described as under: Paris Convention
The application is filed in many offices. The application is filed in the local language. The application fee is paid in the local currency. It have registrations in many countries. It have renewals in many countries. It need services of a local Agent.
Madrid Protocol
The application is filed in the Office of Origin. The application is filed in one language (E,F,S). The application fee is paid in one currency (Sfr). It has only one international registration. It has only one renewal. It needs services of a local agent only if refused. 4 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
The difference between the two procedures can be illustrated with the following representations:
Country-1 Paris Convention Country-2 Country-3 Madrid Protocol Country-1
International Bureau of WIPO
Country-2
Country-3
5 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
The application for the International Registration of Marks via Madrid Protocol is based on the following two criteria:
Basic Application; or Basic Registration.
The Office of Origin forwards the International Application to the IB of WIPO after formality examination. The IB of WIPO also formally examine the application and register the Mark in the International Register and publish it in the WIPO Gazette of International Marks. The IB of WIPO also issue a Registration Certificate to the applicant.
6 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
After the International Registration, the International Application is forwarded to the designated Contracting Parties. The designated Contracting Parties will examine the International Application according to their own National Legislations. The designated Contracting Parties will examine the International Application in 12 / 18 months or more than 18 months in case of any opposition. If a designated Contracting Party will not inform the IB of WIPO within the prescribed time period, the Mark will deemed to be registered in that Contracting Party.
7 IPO-Pakistan
Overview of the Madrid Protocol; Implementation of Methodology; Consideration of the Results; and Recommendations. Annexes
8 IPO-Pakistan
10 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
Background: Most of the Industries in Pakistan consist of Small and Medium Enterprises that are not well aware of the importance of Registration of Trade Marks at National and International Levels. Hypothesis: Capacity Building of the SME sector of Pakistan to understand the importance of Registration of Trade Marks through Public Awareness Campaigns. Methodology: Study of the Public Awareness Strategy and Support for Small and Medium Enterprises in Japan.
11 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
Background: The SME sector of Developing Countries is financially not so strong to afford the fees for the International Registration of Marks through Madrid Protocol. Hypothesis: Financial Support to the SME sector for the International Registration of Marks via Madrid Protocol. Methodology: Comparison of the fees of National Registration of a Mark in Pakistan with the fees of International Registration of a Mark through Madrid Protocol.
12 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
Background: The Economy of Japan is mainly based on Small and Medium Enterprises. Hypothesis: Strategy by the Japanese Companies particularly SMEs to draw maximum benefit from the Madrid Protocol. Methodology: Distribution of Questionnaire to the Japanese Companies particularly SMEs and Interviews of Trade Mark Attorneys practicing Madrid Protocol in Japan.
13 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
Background: The staff requirements, capacity building of the staff, workload analysis and automation requirements are also the key factors before accession to Madrid Protocol. Hypothesis: Study of the Operating System of Japan for handling International Applications filed through Madrid Protocol. Methodology: Distribution of Questionnaire to the Japan Patent Office and Interview of the Officials of JPO. 14
IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
Consequence of the Conflicts between the National Trade Marks Law of Pakistan and the Madrid Protocol: In my opinion, these conflicts can be remedied in the following two ways:
The domestic Trade Marks legislation may be amended in line with the provisions of the Madrid Protocol; or A new chapter may be incorporated in the domestic Trade Marks legislation to register the international applications of Marks filed through Madrid Protocol.
16 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
Effect of the Awareness Strategy for Small and Medium Enterprises in Japan:
Japan Patent Office has implemented the following activities for the development of human resource in the field of IP: Programs for elementary schools, junior high schools, high schools, universities, adults in general, researchers, entrepreneurs including SMEs and experts; Explanatory meetings to the persons who are involved in intellectual property matters; Seminars and Trainings for SMEs and Venture Companies; Training seminars for fostering Patent Licensing Experts; The Regional Headquarters for Intellectual Property Strategy in each region implement measures for raising the awareness level of SMEs and promotion of appropriate use of intellectual property; Patent Office is established in each Regional Bureau of Economy, Trade and Industry to provide information on IP and promoting utilization of Industrial Property rights; and Distribution of a Compendium of examples of Patent Utilization.
17 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
Effect of the Support Measures for Small and Medium Enterprises in Japan:
The various support measures taken by the Japan Patent Office for small and medium enterprises of Japan are elaborated as under: Consultation services on Industrial Property rights; Intellectual Property specialists to provide support to SMEs in terms of consultations, raising awareness and developing human resources in local areas; Free individual consultation services by experts; Support for Regional IP Advisory Counters established at Chambers of Commerce and Industry; Industrial Property Digital Library (IPDL); Patent Information Advisors; Support of Prior Art Searches; Reduction or exemption from Examination Request Fee; Accelerated examinations and accelerated appeal/trial; Refund system on Examination Request Fee; Reduction or exemption from the Patent Annual Fees; Project for supporting the formulation of Intellectual Property Strategies; and 18 Project on Model Utilization of Intellectual Property Rights.
IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
Outcome of the Comparison of Fees of Domestic Registration of a Mark in Pakistan with the Fees of International Registration of a Mark via Madrid Protocol:
In Pakistan, the fees required for the domestic registration of a Mark in one class is around PKR 5,000 (76 Swiss Francs); [1CHF = 66PKR] Whereas in order to register a Mark through Madrid Protocol, the applicant has to pay a Basic Fee (653 or 903 Swiss Francs), a Supplementary Fee (73 Swiss Francs for each class beyond three classes) and a Complementary Fee (73 Swiss Francs) or if a Contracting Party has fixed its own Individual Fee then the applicant has to pay the Basic Fee and the Individual Fee fixed by that Contracting Party;
19 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
The fees of PKR 5,000 for domestic registration of a Mark in Pakistan does not predict the correct amount of fee and thus cannot be compared with the fee for the international registration of a Mark via Madrid Protocol. This is because of the following facts: In Pakistan, separate application must be filed for each class whereas in Madrid Protocol one application covers all the classes of goods and services; and In Pakistan, there is Pre-Grant Opposition System and one can never be sure whether an opposition or oppositions are going to be filed against the registration of a Mark or not. Therefore, PKR 5,000 is not a fixed amount of fee for the domestic registration of a Mark in Pakistan because against each opposition, applicant has to file a counterstatement along with the prescribed amount of fee. 20
IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
Hypothesis No. 4:
W, 550 V, 876
A, 21 B, 400 C, 1024
Number of Employees
D, 400
U, 550
T, 1176
I, 145 J, 215
21 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
0%
4%
4% 4%
13%
75%
100%
Yes
No
<5
< 10
< 15
< 20
100-300
22 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
6% 11%
4%
9%
49%
30%
91%
Patents
Trade Marks
Industrial Designs
Utility Models
Copyrights
Yes
No
23 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
Does Trade Marks are playing a key role in growing the business of your company?
9%
17%
83%
91%
Yes
No
Yes
No
24 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
Does the number of Trade Marks owned by your company will increase in future?
17%
22%
0% 4%
61% 13%
83%
<5
< 10
< 15
< 20
50-200
Yes
No
25 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
What are the number of Trade Marks that are registered abroad by your company?
22%
22%
4% 0% 4% 70%
78%
Yes
No
<5
< 10
< 15
< 20
25-75
26 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
Does Trade Marks are registered abroad by Paris Convention route or Madrid Protocol route?
17%
17%
35%
40% 13%
17%
13% 9%
9%
30%
<5
< 10
< 15
< 20
> 20
No Reply
Paris Convention
Madrid Protocol
Both
No Reply
27 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
What are the number of Trade Marks that are registered in foreign countries by your company before and after the accession of Japan to Madrid Protocol?
Before Accession to Madrid Protocol After Accession to Madrid Protocol
22% 30%
<5
< 10
< 15
< 20
20-60
No Reply
<5
< 10
< 15
< 20
> 20
No Reply
28 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
What are the number of countries in which your company has registered its Trade Marks before and after the accession of Japan to Madrid Protocol?
Before Accession to Madrid Protocol After Accession to Madrid Protocol
22% 34%
26%
52%
17%
13%
9% 9% 9%
0% 9% 0%
<5
< 10
< 15
< 20
> 20
No Reply
<5
< 10
< 15
< 20
> 20
No Reply
29 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
How your company files an application for Trade Marks registration in foreign countries?
Paris Convention
Madrid Protocol
26%
48%
0%
52%
74%
0%
Company Itself
No Reply
Company Itself
No Reply
30 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
30%
70%
96%
Yes
No
Yes
No
31 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
What is the role of the IP Department in your company? Most of the companies that have an IP Department have the same role that is the acquisition, management and maintenance of IP rights, handling of licensing agreements and disputes and search of IP rights of other companies.
30%
57% 0% 0% 13% 0%
<5
< 10
< 15
< 20
Others
No Reply
32 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
17%
17%
17%
66%
83%
Yes
No
Yes
No
No Reply
33 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
Does your company used any of the International Treaty to register its IP rights?
13%
13%
26% 61%
87%
Yes
No
Yes
No
No Reply
34 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
Do you know what is Madrid Protocol for the International Registration of Marks?
4% 17%
Yes
No
No Reply
35 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
What do you think that Madrid Protocol is beneficial for your company?
13%
9%
39%
39%
52%
48%
Yes
No
No Reply
Yes
No
No Reply
36 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
Is the Government of Japan received your company views before acceding to Madrid Protocol?
13% 0%
Yes
No
No Reply
37 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
Does your company ever used the route of Madrid Protocol for registering its marks abroad?
9%
39%
52%
87%
Yes
No
No Reply
Yes
No
No Reply
38 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
Is the fee structure for the international registration of a mark via Madrid Protocol is acceptable to your company?
17%
57% 26%
Yes
No
No Reply
39 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
Why the Paris Convention route is better than the Madrid Protocol route?
13% 26%
Paris Convention is simpler for small number of applications; and It has more proven records.
61%
Yes
No
No Reply
40 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
What do you think whether the provision of Central Attack is acceptable to your company or not?
14% 5%
4%
17%
79%
81%
Yes
No
No Reply
Yes
No
No Reply
41 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
The provision of Central Attack is not acceptable to our company due to a negative impression of having loss.
42 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
(contd.)
In view of the first Attorney, the main disadvantage of Madrid Protocol is the provision of Central Attack whereas the second Attorney is of the view that the main disadvantage of Madrid Protocol is that the burden of the Patent Office will increase; Both the Attorneys are of the view that MM18 form is submitted along with MM2 form when US is designated because it is the requirement of its national legislation and MM17 form is submitted along with MM2 form, if the applicant has any Claim of Seniority in the countries of the European Community; Both the Attorneys are of the view that the submission of different forms like MM18 form with MM2 form is against the harmonization of the system. However, at this stage each countrys national law is different and individual requirements will decrease, when laws of each country are harmonized; Both the Attorneys are of the view that no supplementary and complementary fees are payable when the applicant designates a Contracting Party that fix its own Individual Fee. But, when the Contracting Party requires additional fee for additional classes, the supplementary fee fixed by that Contracting Party for each additional class must also be paid; 44
IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
Both the Attorneys are of the view that the applicant will pay the Individual Fee directly to the International Bureau of WIPO; Both the Attorneys are of the view that the applicant will pay the Supplementary and Complementary Fees directly to the International Bureau of WIPO; Both the Attorneys are of the view that the Individual Fee fixed by a Contracting Party may not be higher than the equivalent amount which the assumed Contracting Party will receive from an applicant for a ten year registration or from the holder of a registration for a ten year renewal of that registration; In view of the first Attorney, if the local fee for domestic Trade Mark filing is too expensive than the fees required for the international registration of a Mark then such kind of discrepancy can be remedied by fixing an Individual Fee whereas in view of the second Attorney, if the official fee is less than the complementary fee then the Contracting Party should not fix its own Individual Fee and vice versa;
45 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
Both the Attorneys are of the view that the application will be translated by the International Bureau of WIPO in case where the Office of Origin is using French language and the designated Contracting Party is using English or Spanish language, as the case may be; In view of the first Attorney, the International Registration is dependent on the basic application or registration for the first 5 years probably due to the Article 6quinqies of the Paris Convention whereas in view of the second Attorney this provision comes forward from the Madrid Agreement but the Attorney does not know the reason that why this provision of Central Attack is carried forward in the Madrid Protocol; Both the Attorneys are of the view that the Japanese clients enquire about the fees, time and procedure of international registration of a Mark filed through Madrid Protocol. In addition to this, the clients are very much concerned about the description of goods and services; Both the Attorneys have described almost similar practices and processes to handle the international applications filed through Madrid Protocol;
46 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
Both the Attorneys are of the view that the description of goods and services in the international application is a difficult task for the Attorneys because every Contracting Party has its own interpretations of goods and services; In view of the first Attorney, there is a reduction in the revenues of the Patent firms in Japan after acceding to the Madrid Protocol whereas in view of the second Attorney there is no impact of Madrid Protocol on the revenues of the Patent firms in Japan especially SHIGA International Patent Office; Both the Attorneys are of the view that Madrid Protocol is a very effective system for the Industries because it provides an easy way to protect and manage their IP rights around the globe; Both the Attorneys are of the view that the small and medium enterprises will benefit from the Madrid Protocol because the cost is low and the procedures are much simpler as compared to Paris Convention route;
47 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
The first Attorney is of the view that this question may better be asked to JPO but the second Attorney is of the view that the most important implication that an Office of Origin will face after accession to Madrid Protocol is the difference between domestic applications and the Madrid Protocol applications. In addition to it, the Office of Origin will have to work in English, French or Spanish language; Both the Attorneys are of the view that a country should accede to Madrid Protocol because it will facilitate its industry especially SMEs to expand their businesses; and In view of the first Attorney, Japanese are still using the Paris Convention route more as compared to the Madrid Protocol route due to the provision of Central Attack whereas the second Attorney is of the view that this is because of the fact that there is very less membership from the Asian countries in the Madrid Protocol and the Japanese Companies have already registered their Marks via Paris Convention route.
48 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
Corollary of the Questionnaire to Japan Patent Office and Interview of the Officials of Japan Patent Office:
On the basis of questionnaire and interview, the following five parameters are taken in to consideration:
Staff Strength and Workload Analysis; Capacity Building Requirements of the Staff; Awareness and Support Measures; Automation Requirements; and Views of the Stakeholders.
49 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
(contd.)
The number of applications that are examined by each Examiner for Madrid Protocol in the year 2006 is 293; Whereas, the number of domestic applications examined by each examiner in the year 2006 is 936 approximately; This difference in workload is due to the fact that the applications filed through Madrid Protocol are in English; The appeals against the Trade Mark Examinations are handled by the 35th to 38th Boards of Appeal; There are 11 Appeal Examiners that deals with the appeals of Trade Mark applications filed via Madrid Protocol; and The number of appeals and inter-parties trials that are handled by each appeal examiner for Madrid Protocol applications in the year 2007 is 14.
51 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
(contd.)
(contd.)
No particular automation is required in connection with the work of International Trade Mark Application Office both as an Office of Origin and as a designated Contracting Party; In JPO, E-Filing is available for the domestic applications but there is no E-Filing is available for the international applications filed through Madrid Protocol; The paperless environment is not yet extended to the International Trade Mark Application Office of JPO; and The means of communication between JPO and WIPO is through paper documents, facsimile, telephone and email. JPO also uses electronic dispatching by using a File Transfer Protocol (FTP) server.
54 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
In 1997, Japan Patent Office has conducted an opinion survey covering 760 domestic corporations to know their point of view before acceding to Madrid Protocol; and In addition, Japan Patent Office has also requested the Industrial Property Council which consists of representatives from patent attorneys, enterprises and other organizations to deliberate on joining the Madrid Protocol.
55 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
Awareness and capacity building of small and medium enterprises is necessary for the maximum utilization of Madrid Protocol; Seminars should be arranged in all the Chambers of Commerce and Industry to disseminate the information of Madrid Protocol; Surveys should be conducted to know the point of view of the small and medium enterprises and other stakeholders before acceding to Madrid Protocol; and There should be an Intellectual Property Training Centre at the national level who has the capacity to educate all the persons that are related to the field of IP.
57 IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
The Fees for the international registration of a Mark should be reduced for the developing countries to widen the scope of the system; The Government of a developing country may provide some kind of financial assistance to the SMEs for facilitating them to register their Marks abroad; and The country who wants to accede to Madrid Protocol may fix its own Individual Fee as most of the members of Madrid Protocol receive an Individual Fee instead of receiving a share from the supplementary and complementary fees from WIPO. 58
IPO-Pakistan
(contd.)
Acquisition of intellectual property rights is very important for a small and medium enterprise to grow; The maintenance of IP Profile on the websites of the companies will help them to win the trust of the clients; Patents, Trade Marks and Industrial Designs are the most important IP forms for the development of an SME; The registration of Marks through Madrid Protocol is far more easier as compared to the Paris Convention; Every company should establish a separate IP department for the management of its IP rights; The staff of the IP department must be well conversant with the domestic registration procedures of different forms of IP as well as with the international treaties for the registration of IP rights in the world;
59 IPO-Pakistan
Recommendations
(contd.)
(contd.)
There should be a separate section in the Trade Marks Registry that deals with the international applications filed through Madrid Protocol; The Trade Mark Examiners for international applications filed through Madrid Protocol should be separated from the Trade Mark Examiners dealing with the domestic applications; Capacity Building of the Trade Mark Examiners dealing with the international applications in terms of the rules and regulations of Madrid Protocol, language, computer literacy etc. is necessary before acceding to Madrid Protocol; There should be no back log in the Trade Marks Registry in order to reduce the chances of failure of the system; E-Filing is not a pre-requisite for acceding to Madrid Protocol but it facilitates the applicants to use the system; The Trade Marks Registry should have an effective system of electronic communication with the International Bureau of WIPO; Madrid Protocol will work more efficiently in Post- Registration Opposition system as compared to Pre-Registration Opposition 61 system.
IPO-Pakistan
62 IPO-Pakistan