Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S Firman
S Firman
DOCTORAL COLLOQUIUM-EURAM 2006 OSLO- MAY 2006 ARIES FIRMAN CURTIN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY PERTH- WESTERN AUSTRALIA
INTRODUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT (PM) HAS A TRADITION OF CONSIDERING SUCCESS THROUGH THE LENS OF THREE SUBSTANTIVE MECHANISMS TIME THESE ARE: TIME, QUALITY AND COST PM IN THE WEST: RATIONALES AND METHODS INDONESIAN:TYPICALLY IN RELATIONAL WAY
COST
Many infrastructure projects in Indonesia are supported by international agencies: IMF, WORLD BANK, ADB, JBIC etc. Most of the projects use the standard condition of contract prepared by FIDIC ( Federation International Des Ingenieurs Conceils) which is the International Federation of Consulting Engineers based in Lausanne (Switzerland) The infrastructure projects typically consist of three primary stakeholder groups. These are: Owners (or Employers or Clients) O Designers (or Consultants or Engineers) D Contractors (or Suppliers or Vendors) C
PEOPLE
Quality
COST
FINDINGS
The results from the content analysis are grouped into six categories of: the value of time, the value of quality, the value of cost, about the other stakeholders, FIDIC, and leadership Each category carries several sub categories developed during data analysis. The data within the different codes from owners, designers and contractors were then compared in tables In each table, a gap analysis was conducted to investigate similarities and differences between the codes of each stakeholder group. Identification of gaps led to a model showing the relationship between the stakeholders for each of those specific categories As a result, a matrix of gap analysis has been produced, with each model showing the connection of the three stakeholder group members in terms of their perceptions: time, quality and cost.
MATRIX OF GAP ANALYSIS: TOTAL NUMBER OF GAPS AND MAJOR QUOTATIONS FROM THE RESPONDENTS
Model
O
Owners (O)
3 - Time is of their concern because if it can be faster, they can get good names in front of their superior 7 - Speaking about quality, generally we are the same. In fact, the consultants should defend the owners interests 4 - In term of cost, owners do not have so much concern to reduce it
C
Designers (D)
6 - What they sell is man-hours. So, their perspective is totally different
Contractors (C)
3 -Contractors tend to complete the works at the earliest time. In term of time, contractors will strive for being on time 5 - The contractors tend to be a sort of brokerage as they are not so stringent in controlling the quality
Time D C
Quality
7 -So, they use specialists based on previous projects for their convenience in term of quality
D
O Cost
10 - Owners do not have so much concern about how much should the optimum cost be
11 - Owners do not have so much concern as the money is not coming from the officers pocket
MATRIX OF GAP ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF FIDIC: MODELS AND MAJOR CODE IN EACH STAKEHODER GROUP
Model
O
Owner (O)
Designer (D)
Contractors (C)
Time D O C
Delay
Delay
Strict
Quality
Quality control
C
High Quality
Strict/stringent
Cost
Change order
C
Change order
Claim
Leadership
As a result of the gap analysis, on the topic of leadership, a stronger connection exists between designers and contractors than between designers and owners, or contractors and owners
DISCUSSION
Structural relationships come into play in the project implementation Interestingly, strong connections only exist in different aspects of project management: time, quality and cost For each aspect, there is only one strong connection, not two or three as suggested by literature Ethical issues appear to be critical between project stakeholder groups The stakeholders are affected by social status The FIDIC contract raises the issue of equality in project management applications in Indonesia
DISCUSSION (continued)
This research shows that the triple constraints are unlikely to be perceived similarly to the original concept Modifications are, therefore, inevitable for projects where the perceptions of project personnel requires attention Leadership (L), ethics (E) and social status (SS) should be added to the triple constraints
T
L P
SS
CHALLENGES
Inequalities between project stakeholders still exist in Indonesia though current law issued in the year 2000 promoted equality Indonesian culture of consultation and consensus are confronted with the question of collusion between project stakeholders Feudalism and paternalism could become the major challenges in the application of participative leadership Contractual dispute settlement suggested in FIDIC was likely to affect long term relationship between the stakeholder groups Harmonious relationship between project stakeholders should not just be based on the perceived value of time, quality and cost. It should also include human elements such as leadership, ethics and social status