Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Diaphyseal Fractures in Children Final - 2
Diaphyseal Fractures in Children Final - 2
Diaphyseal Fractures in Children Final - 2
Mohamed M. Zamzam
Associate Professor & Consultant Pediatric Orthopedic Surgeon KKUH !i"adh Saudi Ara#ia
Objectives
$ $ $ $ %o recall specific considerations of diaph"seal fractures in children %o #e a&are of common possi#le complications %o identif" the treatment of choice in each particular situation among a #ig list of management options %o create an algorithm as a guide for managing long #one shaft fractures in pediatric population
General Principles
$ $
. . . .
A#out )*+ of in,uries in children are s-eletal Out of all s-eletal in,uries in children
!adial shaft fractures %i#ial shaft fractures (emoral shaft fractures Pro2imal & shaft humerus fractures /.0 + /.1 + 1.) + ).0 +
Specific Problems
$ $ $ $ Premature complete physeal closure Progressive limb length discrepancy Nonunion Open reduction and internal fixation
General management
$ Cast $ Internal fixation $ External fixation
General management
$ Cast $ Internal fixation $ External fixation
General management
$ Cast $ Internal fixation $ External fixation
General management
Indications for surgery
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ Head in,ur" Multiple in,uries Adolescence (ailure of conser3ati3e means Se3ere soft4tissue in,ur" 5eurological disorder Malunion and dela"ed union
Forearm
$ %he distal radial epiph"seal plate realigned &ell in children #elo& )= "ears $ !adioulnar angulation usuall" associated &ith loss of motion $ %he ris- of refracture
Forearm
Treatment options
$ Closed reduction > cast $ AO plates $ ?ntramedullar" fi2ation
Forearm
Closed intramedullary nailing
$ Specific anatomic considerations $ %he isthmus of radius and ulna is narro& :range @ A4/ mm; $ Optimum entr" points
Forearm
Closed intramedullary nailing
$ ?nternal fi2ation of the radius onl" $ %he radius has the more complicated function $ Better alignment of the ulnar fracture
Closed
Closed
Angulation +20
Closed
Angulation 0-10 Angulation 10-20 All ages years 0-5 Long arm cast or splint uccess!ul i! " 10
Angulation +20
Closed
Angulation 0-10 Angulation 10-20 All ages years 0-5 Long arm cast or splint uccess!ul i! " 10
Angulation +20
&nsuccess!ul
Open reduction +# $%
Humerus
$ ?ncidence is related to the cause and age group $ Classified according to
. (racture pattern . Cocation . %issues damaged
Humerus
$ $ $ Priorit" is gi3en to conser3ati3e treatment Osteos"nthesis :)=+; 82ternal fi2ation
Humerus
potential operative indications
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ Open fractures Multiple trauma Bilateral in,uries Compartment s"ndromes Pathological fracture Significant ner3e in,uries ?nade7uate closed reduction
$$$
$ ' $$
Closed reduction urgical indications ,ids(a!t angulation 20 " Closed reduction + # $% $mmobili)e in so!t dressing 20 -
$$$
$ ' $$
#+ternal !i+ator
Femur
$ Stress fracture $ Pulmonary complications $ ro!th disturbances resulting in ). accelerated gro&th 1. retarded gro&th A. a2ial deformities 0. rotational deformities $ Spontaneous correction
Femur
$ Stress fracture $ Pulmonary complications $ ro!th disturbances resulting in ). accelerated gro&th 1. retarded gro&th A. a2ial deformities 0. rotational deformities $ Spontaneous correction
Femur
$ Stress fracture $ Pulmonary complications $ ro!th disturbances resulting in ). accelerated gro&th 1. retarded gro&th A. a2ial deformities 0. rotational deformities $ Spontaneous correction
Femur
$ Stress fracture $ Pulmonary complications $ ro!th disturbances resulting in ). accelerated gro&th 1. retarded gro&th A. a2ial deformities 0. rotational deformities $ Spontaneous correction
Femur
$ $ $ $ Ade"uately managed non#operatively Operative approach $#% years post#in&ury non#debilitating pain Strict adherence to a surgical techni"ue
Femur
Treatment options
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ ?mmediate hip spica 'ela"ed hip spica Plate osteos"nthesis Con3entional ?M5 Stainless steel K4&ires %itanium elastic nailing 82ternal fi2ation
Femur
$ $ $ $ %he optimal method 8conomic reasons ParentsD decision E 4 )= "ears :no manFs land;
Femur
Conservative mode
$ Co& ris- of o3ergro&th $ !otational malalignment of up to 1= degrees corrects during gro&th $ 8conomicall" cheap
Femur
Narro! lo!#contact 'CP
$ $ $ $ $ Minimal e2posure Percutaneous scre& placement Sta#le mode of fi2ation Biologic healing potential 8arl" patient mo#ilization
Femur
(igid intramedullary nail
$ $ ?n older children and adolescents Placement through the lateral aspect of 6%
). Safe techni7ue 1. 8ffecti3e A. Gell tolerated
$ $
Femur
ESIN
$ $ $ $ $ $ simple procedure Minimal #lood loss Short operati3e time K4&ires H %itanium 1 to )0 "ears H 8nder nails
Femur
External fixation
$ $ $ $ $ Simple and elegant !is- of refracture Cength of hospital sta" %ime to union Gire site infection
Open
Debridement in OR
$n!ants
.ounger c(ild
Older c(ild
Adolescent
Open
Debridement in OR
$n!ants
.ounger c(ild
Older c(ild
Adolescent
Abused
.es
%o
/ospital 1in0est'
Open
Debridement in OR
$n!ants
.ounger c(ild
Older c(ild
Adolescent
Abused
#+cessi0e s(ortening
.es
%o
%o
.es C(oice
/ospital 1in0est'
# $%
Open
Debridement in OR
$n!ants
.ounger c(ild
Older c(ild
Adolescent
Abused
#+cessi0e s(ortening
Comminution
.es
%o
%o
.es C(oice
%o
.es
/ospital 1in0est'
# $%
#+ternal !i+ator
Open
Debridement in OR
$n!ants
.ounger c(ild
Older c(ild
Adolescent
Abused
#+cessi0e s(ortening
Comminution
.es
%o
%o
.es C(oice
%o
.es
/ospital 1in0est'
# $%
#+ternal !i+ator
Reamed rod
Tibia
Special considerations
$ $ $ $ $ Child abuse Isolated tibial fractures Open fractures Pathological fractures Stress fractures
Tibia
Special considerations
$ $ $ $ $ Child abuse Isolated tibial fractures Open fractures Pathological fractures Stress fractures
Tibia
Special considerations
$ $ $ $ $ Child abuse Isolated tibial fractures Open fractures Pathological fractures Stress fractures
Tibia
Special considerations
$ $ $ $ $ Child abuse Isolated tibial fractures Open fractures Pathological fractures Stress fractures
Tibia
Special considerations
$ $ $ $ $ Child abuse Isolated tibial fractures Open fractures Pathological fractures Stress fractures
Tibia
Specific problems
$ 'elayed unions $ Nonunion $ )alunion $ Compartment syndromes
Tibia
Specific problems
$ 'elayed unions $ Nonunion $ )alunion $ Compartment syndromes
Tibia
Specific problems
$ 'elayed unions $ Nonunion $ )alunion $ Compartment syndromes
Tibia
Specific problems
$ 'elayed unions $ Nonunion $ )alunion $ Compartment syndromes
Tibia
Treatment is based on*
$ $ $ $ patient age concomitant in&uries fracture pattern surgeon experience
Tibia
Treatment options
$ $ $ $ Closed reduction and casting External fixation Internal fixation ESIN
Tibia
Treatment of se"uelae after union*
$ Physeal closure $ +eg#length discrepancy $ Progressive valgus deformity
Tibia
Treatment of se"uelae after union*
$ Physeal closure $ +eg#length discrepancy $ Progressive valgus deformity
Tibia
Treatment of se"uelae after union*
$ Physeal closure $ +eg#length discrepancy $ Progressive valgus deformity
Open
Debridement in OR
Closed 3olytrauma
$$$
$ ' $$
#+ternal !i+ator
Closed reduction + # $%
Open
Debridement in OR
Closed 3olytrauma
$$$
$ ' $$
#+ternal !i+ator
Closed reduction + # $%
Open
Debridement in OR
Closed 3olytrauma
Closed reduction ' cast
$$$
$ ' $$
4ailed
ucceed
#+ternal !i+ator
Closed reduction + # $%
Summary
$ Non surgical treatment is the treatment of choice in most diaphyseal fractures in children $ If surgery is indicated, ESIN is the best option $ Special attention is directed to
. Open fractures . Child abuse . Pathological fractures
Thank you