Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evalutating Face Models Animated by Mpeg-4 Faps: J.Ahlberg, I.S.Pandzic, L.You Image Coding Group Linköping University
Evalutating Face Models Animated by Mpeg-4 Faps: J.Ahlberg, I.S.Pandzic, L.You Image Coding Group Linköping University
Evalutating Face Models Animated by Mpeg-4 Faps: J.Ahlberg, I.S.Pandzic, L.You Image Coding Group Linköping University
Outline
Purpose Creating Test Data Performing the Test Measuring the Results Reproducing the Test Conclusion
Purpose
To investigate how well animated face models can express emotions when controlled by low level MPEG-4 FAPs reproducing the motion captured from real faces acting as the emotion. Proposing a standard benchmark test for MPEG-4 animated face models.
Feature points were tracked using a system with four IR-sensitive cameras and IR-markers. Different emotions were acted out, without any other action as well as when reading a sentence. Video was recorded simultaneously.
21 sequences with 4 different people acting out different emotions. Each sequence recorded as a real video and also synthesized using FAPs with two different models. Thus, in total, 63 sequences were created.
Real video
Oscar model
150 persons each watched 2/3 of the sequences (each sequence watched by 100 persons). The subjects marked for each sequence which emotion they thought the sequence showed. Each sequence was shown a few consecutive times. The following slides show the layout of the test.
Compare the synthetic, real, ideal and random cases. Absolute Expressive Performance
Compare the dispersion matrices and calculate the
L1-norm of the differences. Normalize so that the random case == 0 and the ideal case == 100.
Test Results
The test is intended to be reproducible by anyone who wants to test/compare their face model(s). Video-, FAP- and SMIL-files will be available in a package that can be downloaded for free from the Image Coding Group website.
Conclusion
The expressive performance of the face models much worse than of the real video. No significant difference between the two face models. Main result: A reproducible test proposed as a standard benchmark test for the expressive performance of face models.