Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Decision Support System
Decision Support System
Data Analysis Systems Information Analysis System Accounting Systems Model Based Systems Solver Oriented DSS Suggestion System Text oriented DSS Communication-driven Document-driven Knowledge-driven Compound DSS
What - if analysis Goal oriented Risk analysis Model building Graphical analysis
a) b) c) d) Seeking a quick summary of data. Forecasting activities. Detecting trends over time. Composing points and patterns at different variables.
A group decision support system is a decision support system that facilitates decision making by a team of decision markets working as a group. The importance of collective decisions is being felt today. For main issue to be sorted out, brainstorming sessions are carried out and the collective pool of ideas and opinions give a final shape to a decision. A GDSS is a DSS that facilitates decision making by a team of decision maker working as a group.
Characteristics of GDSS
A GDSS is a goal oriented A GDSS is a specially designed information system. A GDSS is easy to learn and to use. A GDSS is designed with the goal of supporting groups of decisions makers in their work. The GDSS is designed to encourage activities such as idea generation, conflict resolution and freedom of expression.
High level managers can spend 80% of their time making decisions in groups. Applied correctly, GDSS can reduce this time, arriving at a better decision faster. GDSS provides the hardware, software, databases and procedures for effective decision making.
Types of GDSS :
Components of GDSS
GDSS help to enhance group decision making by following ways: Improved preplanning Increased participation Open, collaborative meetings atmosphere Criticism free idea generation Documentation of meeting Setting priorities and making decisions
GDSS
US Air Force
GDSS
IBM Corp.
Source: Ventana Corp., Tuscon, AZ, http://www.ventana.com
GDSS
Video Conferencing
Groupware
Software designed to support collaboration, including capturing and storing the information exchanged Current market leaders are Lotus Notes and Domino, Microsoft Exchange, Novell GroupWise and Oracle Office Individual tools inside the software suite include a meeting manager (Lotus Sametime) and message exchange (Lotus Notes Mail)
Groupware system
Groupware Classification
A classification system based on type of support it provides:
1. 2. 3.
4. 5. 6.
Messaging systems Conferencing systems Collaborative authoring systems: eg Google doc , Media wiki Group DSS Coordination systems Intelligent agent systems eg IBM Web Browser Intelligent
productivity Reduced number of meetings Increased automation of routine workflow Need for better global coordination Availability of widespread networks
5-4: Managing MDM (multiparticipant decision maker ) Activities Some of the more common MDM coordination methods are:
1. 2.
3.
4. 5.
Nominal group technique Delphi technique Arbitration Issue-based information system Nemawashi
2.
3.
4.
Each participant writes down ideas about what the decision should be. In turn, each participant presents his or her ideas, which are recorded on a whiteboard. No discussion occurs here. After all ideas are presented, participants may question others. Each participant votes on each idea.
Delphi Technique
Essentially the same as nominal group technique except the participants never meet. A survey instrument is used to collect initial input from members. A second survey is sent with a summary of the collective results. These steps repeat until either a consensus or majority view is reached.
Arbitration
Most appropriate when the members of the MDM represent opposing factors. Participants agree that if mutually agreeable alternatives are not found, an outside arbitrator will get involved. The arbitrator then selects the alternative he or she deems most appropriate.
A structured argumentation method. An IBIS is represented as a graph with nodes and links. The IBIS begins with selection of a root issue node, then the various position nodes are linked to the root. These position nodes are then evaluated based on the arguments attached to them.
2.
3.
One or more members of the MDM are designated as coordinators. The coordinators then select remaining participants. Coordinators construct a choice set and then experts rate the choices. Coordinator selects a choice based on results in 2.
Nemawashi (cont.)
4.
5.
The alternative is circulated; the coordinator seeks consensus through persuasion and negotiation. If consensus is reached, coordinators circulate a document that each MDM member signs off on.
.GroupSystems for Windows (Ventana Corp.) .VisionQuest (Collaborative Technologies Corp.) .TeamFocus (IBM Corp.) .SAMM (University of Minnesota) .Lotus Domino / Notes (Lotus Development Corp.) .Netscape Communicator (Netscape Communications Corp.) .TCBWorks (The University of Georgia) (http://tcbworks.cba.uga.edu:8080)
Advanced Tools
1. Alternative Analysis 2. Survey 3. Activity Modeler Other Resources