Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Heckscher Ohlin
Heckscher Ohlin
BASIC ASSUMPTIONS
2 2 1.6
Individuals make decisions so as to maximize happiness, whereas Firms make decisions so as to maximize profits
However, although there is free trade in goods and services, there is no crossborder movement of resources, such as labor
Prices of Goods
Let PC and PF denote the nominal prices of cloth and food. Then, PC/PF is the relative price of cloth (in units of food) and PF/PC is the relative price of food (in units of cloth)
See earlier lecture
Prices of Factors
Let w be the nominal price (or, wage) of labor. Let r be the nominal price (or, rent) of land Then w/r is the relative price of labor (in units of land) and r/w is the relative price of land (in units of labor)
Example: If w = $10 per hour for one worker and r = $100 per hour for one acre of land, then the relative wage for one worker is 1/10 acres of land and the relative rent on an acre of land is 10 hours of labor.
Nominal Prices
The nominal price of a commodity is simply the number of dollars (or any other relevant unit of account) that must be paid to buy one unit of the commodity For example, the nominal price of labor also called the nominal wagemay be $8 per hour
Real Prices
The real price of commodity X, in units of commodity Y, is the amount of Y that costs the same as one unit of X For example, if the nominal price of labor is $8 per hour and the nominal price of a cup of coffee is $2, then the real price of labor is 4 cups of coffee per hour Real prices are also called relative prices
17
As labor becomes more expensive relative to land, cloth, which is labor-intensive in production, finds itself at a disadvantage and becomes relatively more expensive compared to food
As both Home and Foreign use the same technologies, the same FPGP curve is applicable in both countries
Under free trade, the relative price of cloth will be the same in both countries Therefore, the wagerent ratio will also be the same in the two countries
17
As labor becomes relatively more expensive, relatively more land is used in production
12
But the number of acres of land per worker is always higher in food production, reflecting the assumption that food production is land intensive
As both Home and Foreign use the same technologies, these two curves must be true in both countries.
As free trade equalizes the wage-rent ratio worldwide, acres of land per worker in cloth production must be the same worldwide.
Same must be true for food production.
4 12 Acres of Land per worker, T/L
Therefore, Foreign, which has more land per worker than Home, must produce relatively more food
As cloth becomes more expensive relative to food, the output of cloth will increase relative to food, Therefore, the relative supply curves slope upward.
The H-O assumptions about preferences imply that that consumer behavior can be summarized by this Relative Demand curve and that the same curve is true in both Home and Foreign
3
In this figure, when the price of a yard of cloth is 17 times the price of a calorie of food, the number of yards of cloth consumed is 3 times the number of calories of food consumed, for every individual worldwide. Why isnt the latter ratio different for different people?
Relative Demands
Lets say that Alex consumes 3 times as many yards of cloth as calories of food (relative demand is QC/QF = 3) when a yard of cloth is 17 times as expensive as a calorie of food (relative price PC/PF = 17) If Alexs income changes, his relative demand should not change because MRS is independent of the scale of consumption
Relative Demands
Since identical preferences have been assumed, if the relative price of cloth is PC/PF = 17, then Bettys relative demand must also be QC/QF = 3 irrespective of Bettys income Therefore, the same relative demand curve represents everybody Therefore, the same relative demand curve represents both Home and Foreign
Foreign
Home
RD
The relative supplies and demands can be combined to find the autarky relative prices in Home and Foreign Clearly, they are different Therefore, trade will occur if it is allowed Since Home and Foreign differ only in their relative factor endowments, that difference must be the reason why trade occurs
Foreign
autarky
Foreign : land abundant, labor scarce Home: land scarce, labor abundant Cloth: labor intensive production Food: land intensive production
Foreign
autarky
Foreign : land abundant, labor scarce Home: land scarce, labor abundant Cloth: labor intensive production Food: land intensive production
Fig. 4-11 showed that, in autarky, the relative price of cloth is higher in Foreign Therefore, in autarky, the wage-rent ratio must also be higher in Foreign Free trade makes the wage-rent ratio the same in the two countries
Home
PC/PF
w/r
Therefore, to make one additional yard of cloth, you need only 1/5 of a worker. In general, the labor needed to make one unit of cloth can be calculated as 1/MP Marginal Cost is the additional cost of an additional unit of output Therefore, MC = w (1/MP) = w/MP
w C MPL PC
r F MPT PF
Cloth production
We saw earlier that when autarky ends and free trade begins w/r rises in the labor- Foreign abundant country (Home). Therefore, Free trade More land is used per worker
in cloth production and in food production
Home
Food production
This makes labor more productive and land less productive Therefore,
w/PC and w/PF both increase, and r/PC and r/PF both decrease.
Foreign : land abundant, labor scarce Home: land scarce, labor abundant Cloth: labor intensive production Food: land intensive production
Cloth production
When autarky ends and free trade begins w/r falls in the land-abundant country Foreign (Foreign). Therefore, Less land is used per workerFree trade
in cloth production and in food production
Food production
This makes labor less productive and land more productive Therefore,
Home
w/PC and w/PF both decrease, and r/PC and r/PF both increase.
Foreign : land abundant, labor scarce Home: land scarce, labor abundant Cloth: labor intensive production Food: land intensive production
But, if modified to take cross-country differences in technology into account, it fits the data well So, a theory that combines the insights of Ricardo and Heckscher-Ohlin might be best
Were Done!
Any questions or comments?