Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 16

M: MEASURE PHASE

Measure
defect rates and
document the
process in its
current incarnation
M: Measure
The purpose of the measure phase is to fully understand the process and its current
performance by identifying how to best measure performance. These measurements must be
realistic as well as useful, in order to provide help in reducing defects.

This phase includes
Identifying specific performance requirements of relevant critical-to-quality (CTQ) characteristics
Mapping of relevant processes, with all inputs that effect a particular output identified.
Analyze measurement system capability & establish relevant baseline for process capacity
Collect data (ensuring opportunities for error are evaluated)
Verify the problem actually exists

Key Questions for the Measure phase

What is the process? How does it function?
Which outputs effect CTQ the most?
Which inputs effect outputs the most?
Is the ability to measure/detect sufficient?
How is the current process performing?
What is the best the process was designed to do?
At this point fishbone diagrams, process mapping and cause and effect
analysis are useful tools.

The deliverables from the Measure phase include:
Operational Definition
Measurement System analysis
Data collection plan
Baseline performance
The three steps to ensure effective project team :-
a. Finalize Project Y, Performance Standards for Y
b. Validate Measurement System for Y
c. Measure Current Performance and Gap


A. Finalize Project Y, Performance Standards for Y

Operational Definition An Operational definition is a precise of the specific Y to
be measured. This helps in ensuring reliability and consistency during the
measurement process. (Defining CTQs pertaining to problem Project 1 & 2)
CTQ Performance Characteristics
S. No Project Leader CTQ Data Type Operational Definition LSL USL Target
1 S
Time to receive
payments (average time
taken to get the invoices
paid)
Continuous
Start + 60 days Credit Period (Starting from Invoice
Date). Stop - 65 days of Invoice (5 days over of
Customer Credit Period, A Final reminder should be
sent with Penalty norms along with prior gentle
reminders note, ex-Credit Note can be send)
- 60
<60, average
time taken to
get the invoice
should be
reduced
2 B
Late Payment
(defectives)
Discrete
Start + 60 days Credit Period (Starting from Invoice
Date). Stop - 75 days of Invoice (15 days over
of Customer Credit Period, A Final reminder should
be sent with Penalty norms along with prior gentle
reminders note)
- 5%
<20%, goal of
reducing
defective %
from 20% to
5%
B. Validate Measurement System for Y

Q. Project Leader S logically validates the measurement system to capture
Time to receive payments however Project Leader B would like to carry out
Attribute Agreement Analysis to assess the measurement system reliability in
classifying late payment.

After running the trials following outcomes have been observe red:-

Samples: 50 Appraisers: 3
Replicates: 2 Total runs: 300

Attribute Agreement Analysis
(Perform an attribute agreement analysis to evaluate the consistency and accuracy of appraisal data. An attribute
agreement analysis evaluates the consistency of ratings across appraisers, trials, and versus a standard or known
value)
Outcomes:-
Appraiser 1 2 3
Repeatability 93.33% 86.67% 90%
Accuracy 93.33% 83.33% 86.67%




Indicates Project Acceptability with Caution.
Reproducibility 73.33%
Team Accuracy 73.33%
Measure current performance and Gaps
Y
Measure
Operati
onal
Definiti
on
Data
Source
Sample
Size
Who
will
collect
the
data
When
will the
data be
collecte
d
How
will the
data be
collecte
d
X data
be
collecte
d at the
same
time
Data Collection Plan
Once Measurement system reliability has been established, team develops a data collection
plan of Y measure. It is a plan defining the precise data that will be collected, the amount of
data that will be collected, a description of the logistical issues who, where, when data will
be collected and what will be done with data collected.
Points to Remember

Variation in the measurement system will contribute to the observed variation in a
process
Sources of variation in a measurement system are: gage, operator and environment
Study how the operator, gage and system influence measurement error
Historical data is probably infested with measurement error issues. Be careful.
Even if your measurement is OK, audit periodically.


Questions to ask at the beginning

Is the correct data being captured and does it reflect what is happening in the
process?
Are the measurement units at a level to reflect the variation in the process?
Where is the data actually recorded?
How is the data being recorded today?
Who records the data today?
Is there a measurement error? If yes, what is the size of the measurement error?
Questions to ask at the beginning

What are the sources of measurement error?
Is the measurement system stable over time?
What is the maximum error (specs) that the customers will accept?

Questions to ask at the end

Have you validated the measurement or just your ability to read the database?
How large is your measurement error (as % of allowable)?
Is one aspect (reproducibility or repeatability) dominant?
How do we improve the measurement system?

System generated data Questions to ask

What are the inputs into the data, and are there any accuracy issues with the same?
What is the coding in the backend and are there any accuracy issues?
Are there any repeatability and reproducibility issues?
Critical Aspects of a Measurement System
Accuracythe differences between observed average measurement and a standard

Repeatabilityvariation when one person repeatedly measures the same unit with the same
measuring equipment

Reproducibilityvariation when two or more people measure the same unit with the same
measuring equipment

Stabilityvariation obtained when the same person measures the same unit with the same
equipment over an extended period of time

Precision & Accuracy
Target Analogy
I. Precise, not accurate
==
True Value = Bull's Eye
Xbar
II. Accurate, not precise
==
True Value
Xbar
III. Precise and accurate
==
True Value
Xbar
CTQ Baseline Performance
CTQ Zlt ZSt
Time to receive
payments
1.04 2.54
Late Payment 0.78 2.28
Guidelines For Evaluation
Repeatability: 90% of repeated measures for an operator
match

Reproducibility: 90% of the repeated measures across
operators match

Accuracy: 90% of the individual measures match the
standard

You might also like