Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Simple Keynesian Model of Income Determination: Abhishek Garg 09962481572
The Simple Keynesian Model of Income Determination: Abhishek Garg 09962481572
The Simple Keynesian Model of Income Determination: Abhishek Garg 09962481572
Model of Income
Determination
Abhishek garg
abhishekgarg98@gmail.com
09962481572
Session Outline
• Consumption Function
• Planned Investment (I), Government
Purchases (G) and Net Exports (NX)
• Equilibrium Income
• Multiplier
• Income Determination in an Open
Economy and the Foreign Trade Multiplier
11/21/09 2
Introduction
• Full employment level is one of the many possible
states of the economy i.e., it need not be
automatically at this state.
• The model focuses only on the goods market and
the influence of money market on the goods market
is completely ignored.
• Key assumptions.
– Prices remain constant
– Firms are able to sell any amount of output at given level of
prices (that is, the aggregate supply curve is perfectly
elastic)
11/21/09 3
Determination of Equilibrium
Output
11/21/09 4
Equilibrium Output
Equilibrium output is the output level at which the quantity of
11/21/09 5
Equilibrium Output
The concept of aggregate demand, AD is ‘ex-ante’, national income
11/21/09 6
Equilibrium Output
Desired aggregate demand may not be equal to
11/21/09 7
Determination of Equilibrium Output
11/21/09 8
Consumption Function
Consumption expenditure (C) is one of the
important components of aggregate
demand. Although many factors influence
the consumption expenditure, income (Y)
is considered to be the most important
influencing factor.
The relationship between consumption and
income can be described using
consumption function, C = f(Y).
11/21/09 9
Consumption and income are positively related i.e.,
greater the income, greater is the consumption.
C = a +bY
Y
11/21/09 11
Derivation of Savings Function
• If we assume a two-sector economy, income has
to be either spent or saved and there are no other
alternatives to use the income.
Thus, Y = C + S (or) S = Y – C
• S = Y – (a + bY)
• S = – a + (1 – b) Y
• Savings increase (decrease) with the increase
(decrease) in income. This relationship can also
be seen from the above equation, S = - a + (1 – b)
Y. In the equation, (1 – b) represents the marginal
propensity to save (MPS). The sum of MPC and
MPS must be equal to one. For example, if MPC is
0.4, then MPS = 0.6
11/21/09 12
Savings Function
Y=C+S
S=Y–C
S = Y – C = Y – a – bY
= - a + (1 – b)Y
Where b = MPC
11/21/09 13
Planned Investment (I), Government Purchases
(G) and Net Exports (NX)
AD = +bY
A
I + G + NX C = a +bY
11/21/09 16
In the figure, we have shown consumption
function and the aggregate demand
function. The parallel line above the
consumption function is the AD line. Part of
the aggregate demand, i.e. is autonomous
and is independent to the income level,
while remaining part ‘bY’ is dependent on
income and output.
11/21/09 17
Equilibrium Income
• Next , we use the aggregate demand function to
determine the equilibrium level of income and
output.
• Equilibrium level of income is the level at which
aggregate demand is equal to output, which in turn
equals income.
• The 450 line drawn serves as a reference line on
which at all points the level of aggregate demand is
equal to the level of output.
• And, the point at which 45 line cuts AD line is the
equilibrium point and the corresponding income
level is the equilibrium income
11/21/09 18
At output levels below Y, aggregate demand
exceeds output. Consequently, the level of
inventory with firms decreases. This unintended
(undesired) decline in inventories makes firms
to increase their production, resulting in
increase in income levels.
Conversely, at output levels above Y, the output
exceeds aggregate demand causing increase in
level of inventories. This unintended increase in
inventories makes firms to cut their production.
11/21/09 19
Equilibrium Income
AD
AD = +bY
A
I + G + NX C = a +bY
a
450
Y* Y
11/21/09 20
Deriving Equation for Equilibrium
Level of Income
Y = AD = C + I + G + NX
= (a + bY ) + I + G + NX
= A + bY
= Y (1 − b) = A
A a + I + G + NX
=Y = =
1− b 1− b
11/21/09 21
From the above formula, we know that larger
AD2 = A 2+bY
∆A AD1 = A 1+bY
450
Y1* Y 2* Y
11/21/09 24
From the above figure it is clear that
for a change in autonomous
expenditure (∆A), there would be a
greater change in equilibrium income
(Y), because of operation of multiplier.
11/21/09 25
Deriving Equation for Multiplier
Y2 − Y1
α=
A2 − A1
Substituting
A
Y=
1− b
A2 A1
−
1 − b 1 − b 1 1
α= = =
A 2 − A1 1 − b MPS
1
Where = MPS
1− b
11/21/09 26
From the above multiplier equation we
know that larger the marginal propensity to
consume, larger is the value of the
multiplier.
11/21/09 28
Deriving Multiplier (with the
inclusion of Government Sector)
AtEquilibr ium
Y = AD
A A
Y = A + b(1 − t )Y = =
1 − b(1 − t ) 1 − b + bt
1
Where = Multiplier
1 − b + bt
11/21/09 29
The Budget
Budget Surplus (BS) = Tax Revenue (T) –
Government Expenditure (G) – Transfer
Payments (J)
BS = T − G − J
SubstitutingT = tY
BS = tY − G − J
11/21/09 30
Income Determination in an Open Economy
and the Foreign Trade Multiplier
influenced by the open economy (that is, exports are exogenous to the
country).
11/21/09 31
Income Determination in an Open
Economy and the Foreign Trade
Multiplier
∆M
M = M (Y ) = m.Y , where' m' = MPI =
∆Y
∴ AD = (C + I + G + X − M )
∴ AD = (a + bYd ) + I + G + X − mY
∴ AD = a + b(Y − tY + J ) + I +G + X − mY
∴ AD = a + I + G + b J + Y (b − bt − m)
∴ AD = a + G + X + b J + Y [b(1 − t ) − m]
1
∴Y = .a + I + G + X + b J
1 − b(1 − t ) + m
1
∴α =
11/21/09 1 − b(1 − t ) + m 32