Day 1 Presentation 1. NBC No. 461 Views From The DBM by Mr. Macaranas

You might also like

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 14

ROAD MAP

PUBLIC HIGHER EDUCATION REFORM


2011-2016
Commission on Higher Education

Table 1. Number of Philippine Higher Institutions and Enrollment by Type
2010-2011
Institutional Type/AY Number Enrollment
2000-2001 2010-2011 2000-2001 2010-2011
Total HEIs (excluding SUCs campuses) 1,380 1,823
2,229,645 2,504,855
Total HEIs (including SUCs campuses) 1,603 2,247 2,430,842 2,937,847
Public 166 219 771,162 1,193,851
State Universities and Colleges
(SUCs)
107 110 499,002 607,867
SUCs Campuses 223 424 201,197 432,992
Local Universities and Colleges
(LUCs)
40 93 61,954 145,698
Others (include OGS, CSI,
Special HEI)
19 16 9,009 7,294
Private 1,214 1,604 1,659,680 1,743,996
Sectarian 312 334 527,753 466,977
Non-Sectarian 902 1,270 1,131,927 1,277,019
Rationale
Compared to higher education, basic
educationyields greater social returns, and
its provision is the more fundamental duty of
the state
With K-12, current shortages (classrooms,
textbooks, teachers, etc) and demand for
international comparability, basic education
will be prioritized in allocation of government
resources
Private sector will continue to contribute
significantly to higher education delivery
Objective
General:
(with whatever modest resources generated)
maximize public higher education's
contribution towards producing competent
high level professionals and generating
knowledge and technologies for national
development and competitiveness

Objectives
Specific:
1. To rationalize the public higher education
system, improve its internal and external
efficiency, optimize resource utilization and
maximize resource generation;
2. To improve quality and standards of higher
education raise the level of educational outcomes
and increase the social relevance of its
developmental functions; and
3. To expand access to quality higher education
among lower income and disadvantaged groups
Public Higher Education Reform Overall Framework
Milestones
Objective 1. Improve Efficiency

Initiatives Milestones
1. Rationalization of
SUCs distribution and
growth
GIS based map of HEIs and
programs completed by 2011, and
continuously updated thereafter
Blueprint for public HEI system
developed by 2012
Three (3) RUS and two (2)
specialized HEIs pilot tested from
2012 to 2016: RUS bill in process
during Plan period
Milestones
Objective 1. Improve Efficiency

Initiatives Milestones
2. Rationalization of
programs
Typology framework developed by
2011 and initially implemented in
2012, and all SUCs and LUCs
classified by 2013
SUCs programs outside mandates,
duplicative and inefficient identified by
2011, 30% ordered for phase out/closure
by 2012 and 100% in 2013-2016*
New academic programs developed and
launched in critical high level professional
disciplines, e.g. geology, meteorology by
2013
*Total number of SUCs programs = 12,246 higher education + 1200 preschool, elem, H.S. & TechVoc
Milestones
Objective 1. Improve Efficiency
Initiatives Milestones
3. Rationalization of
resources
Generic socialized tuition fee scheme
designed by 2013, and piloted in 5 SUCs in
2014-2016
Normative funding formula revised by 2012,
revised formula applied on 100% of SUCs
MOOE and simulated on PS by 2013, then
fully applied on both MOOE and PS by 2016
22 Leading SUCs with viable IGPs by 2013,
with 50% of their budget accounted for by
internally generated income by 2016
Plan for digitization and automation
formulated by 2012, fully implemented in
accordance with GIFMIS in 20% of SUCs by
2014, in all SUCs by 2016
Milestones
Objective 2. Upgrade quality
Initiatives Milestones
4. Quality assurance
of SUCs/LUCs
All authorized unaccredited SUCs programs
evaluated by 2012; 20% substandard and
non-performing programs closed or phased
out in 2012 and 80% from 2013 to 2016
Improved performance of SUCs graduates in
licensure examinations in priority disciplines
(within their mandates) to 50% passing by
2016*
85 SUCs programs supported for
accreditation in 2012, and 340 programs from
2013 to 2016
5. Faculty
development
500 SUC faculty scholars supported in 2012
and 2000 from 2013 to 2016**
*Baseline 2010 = 31%
**15,566 SUCs faculty (41.9%) w/o grad deg in 2010-2011; 22,966 or 58% w/ grad deg (total 39,532); target will increase to 64.4%
Milestones
Objective 2. Upgrade quality
Initiatives Milestones
6. Upgrading leading
SUCs to
International
Standards
5 R&D Centers established in SUCs and
supported in 2012, and 10 from 2013 to 2016
15 CHED-funded SUCs R&D projects
implemented in 2012, and 30 during 2013-
2016
6 SUCs extension programs conducted for
the NAPC identified focus municipalities
45 COEs/Ds in SUCs identified & processed
with 25 supported in 2012; 150 processed
with 100 supported from 2013-2016

3 SUCs in the top leading universities in the
world by 2016
Milestones
Objective 3. Enhance access
Initiatives Milestones
7. Modernizing
developing
SUCs
89 developing SUCs outside highly
urbanized areas supported
8. STUFAPs Harmonized/integrated scheme of
STUFAPs instituted through
intergovernment/agency collaboration
11,360 STUFAP beneficiaries in SUCs in
2012 and 44,000 from 2013-2016, from
poor and disadvantaged families,
especially in NAPC focus communities
Milestones
Crosscutting
Milestones
Executive
Development
Program
550 SUCs managers trained in
2012; 2000 in 2013-2016
Institutionalization thru
establishment of Higher Education
Academy and HE career system
conceptualized
Fund Source 2011-2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
HEDF (1) 22.00 22.88 25.17 27.68 30.45 128.19
DAP (2) 56.00 30.80 33.88 37.27 40.99 198.94
subtotal 78.00 53.68 59.05 64.95 71.45 327.13
HEDF (3) 286.00 397.44 437.18 480.90 528.99 2,130.52
DAP (4) 3,135.00 1,724.25 1,896.68 2,086.34 2,294.98 11,137.24
GAA (5) 597.16 621.04 683.15 751.46 826.61 3,479.41
subtotal 4,018.16 2,742.73 3,017.01 3,318.71 3,650.58 16,747.18
HEDF (6) 88.60 13.29 1.99 0.00 0.00 103.88
DAP (7) 927.80 1,020.58 1,122.64 1,234.90 1,358.39 5,664.31
GAA (8) 60.34 72.41 86.90 104.28 125.13 449.06
subtotal 1,076.74 1,106.28 1,211.53 1,339.18 1,483.52 6,217.25
DAP 165.00 100.00 110.00 121.00 133.10 629.10
subtotal 165.00 100.00 110.00 121.00 133.10 629.10
5,337.90 4,002.69 4,397.58 4,843.84 5,338.65 23,920.66
(1) HEDF allocation for Institutional Capacity Building for SUCs
(2) Disbursement Acceleration program (DAP) Grant-In-Aids for SUCs - RDE, retained by PIDs
(3) HEDF allocation for COE/COD, Quality Assurance, Research and Faculty Development Programs (FDP) for SUCs
(4) DAP for infrastructure for leading SUCs, DAP for RDE less PIDS' share
(5) GAA allocation for NAFES, Faculty Development and Growth Areas
(6) HEDF allocation for STUFAP
(7) DAP allocation for GIA for Poverty Alleviation and for modernizing facilities of developing SUCs
(8) GAA Allocation for STUFAP
TOTAL
BUDGETARY REQUIREMENTS (in Million Pesos)
For Quality
For Access 3
Crosscutting 4
2
Initiatives
For Efficiency 1

You might also like