Deciphering The Texas Star Chart: by Jeffrey Bergman Edld 5352 - 1182 November 29, 2009

You might also like

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 14

Deciphering the Texas

STaR Chart
By Jeffrey Bergman
EDLD 5352 - 1182
November 29, 2009
Agenda
 Define STaR
 Introduce STaR Chart relevance
 MHS Results 2006-2009
 Summary/conclusion
What is the STaR Chart?
 School Technology and Readiness

 Its purpose is to address the technology


advancements of individual teachers and
campuses/districts

 The chart addresses the Texas Long-Range Plan


for Technology (2006-2020)
STaR Chart key areas:
 Teaching and Learning
 Educator Preparation and Development
 Leadership, Administration, and
Instructional Support
 Infrastructure for Technology
Layman’s terms
 Are teachers and districts helping
students become better 21st Century
learners?

 How compliant are campuses, and


what technologies are available to
students?
Levels of Progress

 Early Tech

 Developing Tech

 Advanced Tech

 Target Tech
Early Tech Level of Progress
 Early Tech indicators are a few of the
following:
 Instruction is teacher-centered
 Skills of teachers include multi-media and
use of the internet
 There is no campus technology plan
 There are 10 or more students per
computer, dial-up connectivity and no
web based learning
Developing Tech Level of
Progress
 Developing Tech indicators are as follows:
 Instruction is teacher-directed and students use
technology on an individual basis
 Skills of teachers includes technology for
administrative tasks and classroom management
 The campus has a Long-Range Plan for technology
 5-9 students per computer with most rooms
connected to WAN/LAN
Advanced Tech Level of
Progress
 Technology is integrated into
foundation area TEKS
 There is an integration of technology
into teaching and learning
 Campus plan is supported and there
are grants along with local funding
 4 or less students per computer with
all rooms connected to WAN/LAN
Target Tech Level of Progress
 Teacher serves as a co-learner and activities
are seamlessly integrated into TEKS
 There are regular technology-supported,
learner-centered projects
 Campus plan is focused on student success
 There is on-demand access for every student
McKinney High School
McKinney High School
 Alternates between Developing and Advanced Tech
 Has it’s own student-created news website-
http://www.mhsnews.net/
 Has many available technology resources, but lacks
in areas of educator preparation
Summary Area of MHS
18
16
14 Teaching and
12 Learning
10 Educator
8 Preparation
6 Instructional
4 Support
Infrastructure for
2
Tech
0
2006- 2007- 2008-
2007 2008 2009
Summary and Conclusion

 MHS showed a weakness in Educator Preparation &


Development (3 point drop in three years based on staff
responses)
 MHS shows strength in Leadership, Administration, &
Instructional Support (Advanced rating for the past two
years)

You might also like